In S2 Fig., the second and third rows of firing rate maps in panel A are swapped and incorrectly labeled "arena frame" and "room frame" respectively. Instead, the second row should be labeled “room frame” and the third row should be labeled “arena frame”. Also, the spatial coherence numbers for the fourth row of firing rate maps in panel A were incorrectly duplicated from the first row. Please see the corrected S2 Fig. here.
The figure legend also omits the sentence “Spatial coherence is given below each firing rate map.” Please view the corrected figure and legend below.
Supporting Information
(A) Firing rate maps of 13 cells recorded together during a two-frame avoidance session that was flanked by two sessions of place avoidance on the stationary arena. During rotation the spatial firing of these cells was better organized in the arena frame than in the room frame. Spatial coherence is given below each firing rate map. (B) The proportion of place cells with spatial coherence greater than 0.4 is similar in the stationary and rotating conditions. The 0.4 threshold was chosen because cells with spatial coherence greater than 0.4 are typically considered high quality place cells.
(TIF)
Reference
- 1. Kelemen E, Fenton AA (2010) Dynamic Grouping of Hippocampal Neural Activity During Cognitive Control of Two Spatial Frames. PLoS Biol 8(6): e1000403 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(A) Firing rate maps of 13 cells recorded together during a two-frame avoidance session that was flanked by two sessions of place avoidance on the stationary arena. During rotation the spatial firing of these cells was better organized in the arena frame than in the room frame. Spatial coherence is given below each firing rate map. (B) The proportion of place cells with spatial coherence greater than 0.4 is similar in the stationary and rotating conditions. The 0.4 threshold was chosen because cells with spatial coherence greater than 0.4 are typically considered high quality place cells.
(TIF)
