Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the mecC gene (mecC-MRSA) exhibited at 37°C MICs of oxacillin close to those of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We investigated whether at this temperature, mecC-MRSA strains respond to flucloxacillin treatment like MSSA strains, using a rat model of endocarditis. Flucloxacillin (human-like kinetics of 2 g intravenously every 6 h) cured 80 to 100% of aortic vegetations infected with five different mecC-MRSA strains. These results suggest that mecC-MRSA infections may successfully respond to treatment with β-lactams.
TEXT
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), isolated for the first time in the 1960s (1), developed resistance against methicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics through the acquisition of mecA, a gene encoding the penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP2a) (2). In 2011, a novel mecA homologue, mecC (3), was identified in bovine and human MRSA isolates (4–8). Although the incidence of mecC-MRSA is low (8–10), these strains cause severe infections in humans (11, 12).
Most mecC-MRSA isolates exhibit MICs of oxacillin less than or slightly greater than the MIC breakpoint of a susceptible strain (≤2 mg/liter), and no clear distinction from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates can be made (13, 14). Furthermore, the activity of the mecC product, namely, PBP2c (15), appears to be thermosensitive, with a decline at 37°C (16). This raises the question as to whether mecC-MRSA infections should be considered like mecA-MRSA infections and treated with vancomycin (17) or like MSSA infections, generally treated with β-lactams, such as flucloxacillin (18). In this study, we investigated the in vivo activity of flucloxacillin on mecC-MRSA strains using a rat model of endocarditis.
Five mecC-MRSA strains, two of animal origin (NCTC 13552 and 1100) and three of human origin (strain 820, from an infected knee [6], and the urine and screening strains S090 and S129 [19]), were used. S. aureus strains ATCC 29213 (MSSA) and Mu50 (mecA-MRSA) were used as controls. The MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin were determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (20). The MICs were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines after incubation at 30°C and 37°C for 24 h. Population analysis profiles (PAPs) were performed on agar plates containing 2-fold serial dilutions of oxacillin and on oxacillin-free plates, as described previously (21). Colony numbers were enumerated after 48 h of incubation at 30°C and 37°C. Oxacillin-induced killing was assessed by time-kill assays using strains NCTC 13552 and S129. The flasks containing Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 2% NaCl were inoculated with 106 CFU/ml of bacteria, exposed to oxacillin (10 mg/liter), and incubated at 30°C or 37°C. The concentration of oxacillin approximated trough levels in the sera of rats and was either less than or greater than the MICs for the organisms when tested at a temperature of 30°C or 37°C, respectively (see below).
The production of catheter-induced aortic vegetations and the installation of the infusion pump device to deliver flucloxacillin were performed in rats as described previously (22, 23). Endocarditis was induced 24 h after catheterization by intravenous (i.v.) challenge of the animals with 105 CFU of each test mecC-MRSA strain and the mecA-MRSA Mu50 strain. Therapy with flucloxacillin (human-like kinetics of 2 g i.v. every 6 h) was started 12 h later and lasted for 3 days. Control rats were sacrificed at the onset of treatment and treated rats at 8 h after the end of the last antibiotic dose. A group of 3 to 4 control animals was also sacrificed at the same time as the treated animals. After the sacrifice, aortic valve vegetations were removed and processed as described previously (24) for colony counts. All protocols for animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Cantonal Committee on Animal Experiments of the State of Vaud, Switzerland (permit number 879.9).
MICs are shown in Table 1. All of the mecC-MRSA isolates were formally resistant to oxacillin at 30°C and susceptible at 37°C (threshold, ≤2 mg/liter). All but the S820 isolate were resistant to cefoxitin (threshold, ≥8 mg/liter) at both 30°C and 37°C. Figure 1 shows that upon exposure to oxacillin at 30°C, mecC-MRSA isolates exhibited subpopulations of resistant bacteria at concentrations up to 32 mg/liter. However, these oxacillin-resistant subpopulations virtually disappeared at 37°C. Moreover, with the exception of strain NCTC 13552, for which resistant subpopulations emerged on 8-mg/liter oxacillin plates, the remaining four tested mecC-MRSA isolates displayed a profile similar to that of MSSA ATCC 29213 (growth at up to 4 mg/liter oxacillin). The mecA-MRSA Mu50 strain displayed homogeneous resistance to oxacillin, as reported previously (25). The rate of killing by oxacillin of the selected isolates NCTC 13552 and S129 was also affected by temperature (Fig. 2). After 24 h of incubation at 30°C, oxacillin did not display any antibacterial activity (Fig. 2A). In contrast, after 24 h of incubation at 37°C, oxacillin caused a 2-log10 CFU/ml decrease in cell viability (Fig. 2B). The results of experimental endocarditis are shown in Table 2. Vegetations of control animals sacrificed at the start of treatment were all infected and contained high (median, 8.5 log10 CFU/g) bacterial counts. The peak (30 min), the trough (6 h) (mean ± standard deviation), and the area under the curve values for flucloxacillin in rat serum were 174 ± 50 mg/liter, 16 ± 5 mg/liter, and 213 mg · h/liter, respectively. The half-life was ca. 1 h. These values were close to those reported in humans, i.e., 125 to 154 mg/liter, 14 mg/liter, 178.6 mg · h/liter, and 1 h, respectively (26, 27). Flucloxacillin sterilized 80 to 100% of vegetations infected with mecC-MRSA strains and reduced the vegetation counts by >6 log10 CFU/g compared to those of controls (P < 0.005). Bacteria recovered from vegetations showed unchanged oxacillin susceptibility. All of the vegetations from control animals sacrificed at the end of treatment were heavily infected (median, 9.8 log10 CFU/g) (data not shown). Flucloxacillin was totally ineffective against the mecA-MRSA Mu50 isolate (0/6 [0%] sterile valves).
TABLE 1.
MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitina
| Strain | MIC (mg/liter) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxacillin |
Cefoxitin |
|||
| 30°C | 37°C | 30°C | 37°C | |
| NCTC 13552 | 8–16 | 0.5–1 | 64 | 8 |
| 1100 | 16 | 0.5–2 | 32 | 8 |
| 820 | 4 | 0.5–1 | 8 | 4 |
| S090 | 16 | 1 | 32 | 16 |
| S129 | 16–32 | 0.5–2 | 64 | 16–32 |
MICs were determined at least three times independently at the indicated temperatures in Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 2% NaCl.
FIG 1.

Phenotypic expression of oxacillin resistance in mecC-MRSA strains assessed by population analysis. Large inocula (ca. 109 CFU) of the test strains were spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 2% NaCl and containing increasing concentrations of oxacillin and on oxacillin-free plates. The plates were incubated at 30°C (A) or 37°C (B) for 48 h, and then the CFU were enumerated. Each assay was performed on two to three independent occasions.
FIG 2.

Killing curves of mecC-MRSA isolates NCTC 13552 and S129 by oxacillin (OXA) at a concentration of 10 mg/liter, simulating antibiotic levels achieved at trough in rat or human serum. The flasks containing the test strains not exposed (controls) or exposed to OXA were incubated at 30°C (A) or 37°C (B) for 24 h. Results are representative of two independent experiments.
TABLE 2.
Outcome of 3-day treatment with flucloxacillin of experimental endocarditis caused by mecC-MRSA isolates
| Strain | No. of sterile vegetations/total no. of vegetations (%; median [range] log10 CFU/g of vegetation) for treatment group: |
|
|---|---|---|
| Control | Flucloxacillina | |
| NCTC 13552 | 0/5 (0; 8.5 [6.7–8.9]) | 10/11 (91b; 2.0 [2.0–2.7])c |
| 1100 | 0/5 (0; 8.8 [8.1–9.1]) | 9/9 (100); 2.0 [2.0–2.0]) |
| 820 | 0/5 (0; 7.7 [6.4–9.0]) | 6/8 (75); 2.0 [2.0–4.1])c |
| S090 | 0/5 (0; 8.0 [7.6–9.4]) | 9/10 (90b; 2.0 [7.0–3.2])c |
| S129 | 0/5 (0; 8.7 [8.3–9.1]) | 8/10 (80b; 2.0 [2.0–6.0])c |
Simulation in rats of human pharmacokinetics following 2 g i.v. every 6 h.
P < 0.05 compared to untreated controls by Fisher's exact test.
P < 0.005 compared to untreated controls by Mann-Whitney test.
In the current study, we observed a clear effect of the temperature on the activity of oxacillin against mecC-MRSA isolates in vitro. Indeed, all five tested mecC-MRSA isolates showed resistance to oxacillin in assays performed at 30°C but were susceptible at 37°C. These results are in agreement with those of previous studies with the NCTC 13552 (formerly LGA251) strain (16). Temperature is known to have an impact in vitro on the susceptibility of heterogeneous mecA-MRSA strains to oxacillin (28–30), possibly due to PBP2a downregulation (31) or enzymatic inactivation at ≥37°C (2). Our results indicate that thermosensitive heterogeneous expression of oxacillin resistance is also present in mecC-MRSA isolates. However, in contrast with mecA-MRSA isolates, where resistant subpopulations grew on plates containing >1,000 mg/liter oxacillin at 37°C (29), mecC-MRSA isolates showed no subpopulations emerging on plates containing >32 mg/liter oxacillin. Furthermore, rats with endocarditis induced by mecC-MRSA were successfully treated with human-like kinetics of flucloxacillin. We attribute these positive outcomes to the body temperature (≥37°C) present in animals with endocarditis (32). Indeed, at this temperature, the MICs of oxacillin for the tested isolates were ≤2 mg/liter, and plasma concentrations of flucloxacillin were greater than the MIC of the organisms throughout the dosing interval.
These data suggest consideration of β-lactams as an option for the treatment of mecC-MRSA infections. However, due to the presence of heterogeneous oxacillin-resistant subpopulations, albeit at low frequency, caution is advised in the use of these drugs. Indeed, in an analogous situation, resistant subpopulations in mecA-MRSA strains negatively impacted the β-lactam therapy of MRSA infections (33).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by grant 310030-143799/1 from the Swiss National Science Foundation.
We thank Ariane Deplano, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, for sending us mecC S. aureus isolates S090 and S129.
We declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jevons MP, Coe AW, Parker MT. 1963. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Lancet i:904–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 158:513–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H, Perreten V, Holden MT, Coleman DC, Goering R, Giffard PM, Skov RL, Zhang K, Westh H, O'Brien F, Tenover FC, Oliveira DC, Boyle-Vavra S, Laurent F, Kearns AM, Kreiswirth B, Ko KS, Grundmann H, Sollid JE, John JF Jr, Daum R, Soderquist B, Buist G, International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) . 2012. Guidelines for reporting novel mecA gene homologues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4997–4999. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01199-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, Walpole E, Brooks K, Pickard DJ, Teale C, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Edwards GF, Girvan EK, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Hill RL, Larsen AR, Skov RL, Peacock SJ, Maskell DJ, Holmes MA. 2011. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:595–603. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Petersen A, Stegger M, Heltberg O, Christensen J, Zeuthen A, Knudsen LK, Urth T, Sorum M, Schouls L, Larsen J, Skov R, Larsen AR. 2013. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E16–E22. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laurent F, Chardon H, Haenni M, Bes M, Reverdy ME, Madec JY, Lagier E, Vandenesch F, Tristan A. 2012. MRSA harboring mecA variant gene mecC, France. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1465–1467. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.111920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kriegeskorte A, Ballhausen B, Idelevich EA, Kock R, Friedrich AW, Karch H, Peters G, Becker K. 2012. Human MRSA isolates with novel genetic homolog, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1016–1018. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.110910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paterson GK, Harrison EM, Holmes MA. 2014. The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 22:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Basset P, Prod'hom G, Senn L, Greub G, Blanc DS. 2013. Very low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the mecC gene in western Switzerland. J Hosp Infect 83:257–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paterson GK, Morgan FJ, Harrison EM, Cartwright EJ, Torok ME, Zadoks RN, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Holmes MA. 2014. Prevalence and characterization of human mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in England. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:907–910. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barraud O, Laurent F, Francois B, Bes M, Vignon P, Ploy MC. 2013. Severe human bone infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC variant. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2949–2950. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.García-Garrote F, Cercenado E, Marin M, Bal M, Trincado P, Corredoira J, Ballesteros C, Pita J, Alonso P, Vindel A. 2014. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the mecC gene: emergence in Spain and report of a fatal case of bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:45–50. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fluit AC. 2011. What to do with MRSA with a novel mec gene? Lancet Infect Dis 11:580–581. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70180-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Skov R, Larsen AR, Kearns A, Holmes M, Teale C, Edwards G, Hill R. 2014. Phenotypic detection of mecC-MRSA: cefoxitin is more reliable than oxacillin. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:133–135. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ballhausen B, Kriegeskorte A, Schleimer N, Peters G, Becker K. 2014. The mecA homolog mecC confers resistance against beta-lactams in Staphylococcus aureus irrespective of the genetic strain background. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3791–3798. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02731-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim C, Milheirico C, Gardete S, Holmes MA, Holden MT, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 2012. Properties of a novel PBP2A protein homolog from Staphylococcus aureus strain LGA251 and its contribution to the beta-lactam-resistant phenotype. J Biol Chem 287:36854–36863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.395962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, J Rybak M, Talan DA, Chambers HF. 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis 52:285–292. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rayner C, Munckhof WJ. 2005. Antibiotics currently used in the treatment of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Intern Med J 35(suppl 2):S3–S16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Deplano A, Vandendriessche S, Nonhoff C, Denis O. 2014. Genetic diversity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying the mecC gene in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1457–1460. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. 9th ed Document M07-A9 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Que YA, Entenza JM, Francioli P, Moreillon P. 1998. The impact of penicillinase on cefamandole treatment and prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 177:146–154. doi: 10.1086/513805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Héraïef E, Glauser MP, Freedman LR. 1982. Natural history of aortic valve endocarditis in rats. Infect Immun 37:127–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fluckiger U, Moreillon P, Blaser J, Bickle M, Glauser MP, Francioli P. 1994. Simulation of amoxicillin pharmacokinetics in humans for the prevention of streptococcal endocarditis in rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2846–2849. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.12.2846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Entenza JM, Vouillamoz J, Glauser MP, Moreillon P. 1997. Levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, or vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1662–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chung M, Antignac A, Kim C, Tomasz A. 2008. Comparative study of the susceptibilities of major epidemic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin and to the new broad-spectrum cephalosporin ceftobiprole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2709–2717. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00266-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bergan T, Engeset A, Olszewski W, Ostby N, Solberg R. 1986. Extravascular penetration of highly protein-bound flucloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 30:729–732. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.5.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frank U, Schmidt-Eisenlohr E, Schlosser V, Spillner G, Schindler M, Daschner FD. 1988. Concentrations of flucloxacillin in heart valves and subcutaneous and muscle tissues of patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:930–931. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.6.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thornsberry C, Caruthers JQ, Baker CN. 1973. Effect of temperature on the in vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillinase-resistant penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 4:263–269. doi: 10.1128/AAC.4.3.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. 1986. Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 29:85–92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mateos-Mora M, Knapp CC, Washington JA II. 1988. Characterization of resistance phenotype and cephalosporin activity in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:170–174. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.2.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Madiraju MV, Brunner DP, Wilkinson BJ. 1987. Effects of temperature, NaCl, and methicillin on penicillin-binding proteins, growth, peptidoglycan synthesis, and autolysis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:1727–1733. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.11.1727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang ML, Zhang Y, Fan M, Guo YJ, Ren WD, Luo EJ. 2013. A rabbit model of right-sided Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis created with echocardiographic guidance. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 11:3. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-11-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chambers HF. 1997. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:781–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
