Our current view of the functional circuitry of the basal ganglia is largely based on data from rodents and non-human primates using various tract-tracing methods combined with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization1-3. These approaches demonstrated that cortical information flows through the basal ganglia via two major projection systems; the so-called “direct” and “indirect” striatofugal pathways that originate from segregated populations of striatal projection neurons and elicit opposite effects upon basal ganglia outflow. Although this dual network model has been greatly refined since its introduction in the late 1980s, it remains a highly useful organizational framework for clinical and basic basal ganglia research. In addition to the striatum, the subthalamic nucleus is also considered as a major entry for cortical information to the basal ganglia network. Because information may be more rapidly conducted to the basal ganglia output nuclei via the cortico-subthalamic projection than via the direct and indirect pathways, the trans-subthalamic route is commonly referred to as the “hyperdirect” pathway4-6.
In a recent study published in Movement Disorders, Milardi et al. suggest the existence of a cortico-pallidal projection in humans 7. Their evidence for this projection is based on imaging data obtained from brain images from normal human volunteers, using a High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging-Constrained Spherical Deconvolution (CSD)-based technique. Although diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is the most commonly used approach to trace white matter tracts in the human CNS 8-10, this technique suffers from a number of limitations including relatively poor spatial resolution, and a limited capacity to characterize neural projection systems consisting of fibers with distinct orientation 11. The CSD method allows for a better discrimination of fiber orientation in neural networks with intravoxel orientation heterogeneity 12-14. Using this approach, Milardi et al. provide imaging data suggesting the existence of a direct connection between Brodmann’s areas 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 11, 46, and 48 and both segments of the globus pallidus in humans. Although the imaging data shown in this study do not provide information about the pattern of innervation and synaptic connections of cortical projections with specific neuronal populations in the external (GPe) and the internal (GPi) segments of the human pallidum, they suggest that GPe receives a more massive cortical innervation than GPi 7. They also demonstrate that this cortico-pallidal system is separate from the descending cortico-spinal and cortico-pontine axons that travel through the internal capsule. As discussed by the authors, the existence of a direct glutamatergic “cortico-pallidal” system that bypasses the traditional direct, indirect and hyperdirect pathways could have a significant impact on our understanding of transmission and processing of information through the basal ganglia circuits in normal and diseased states.
Although this study is the first to highlight the possible existence of a cortico-pallidal projection in humans, such a connection has previously been suggested from different tracing studies in rodents and lampreys. In rats, Naito and Kita reported the existence of a cortico-pallidal (and cortico-nigral) projection(s) based on data obtained after injections of the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) in various cortical regions15,16. They found that BDA injections into the precentral medial and lateral cortices (homologues of the supplementary motor area, and primary motor/portions of the somatosensory cortices in primates, respectively) resulted in anterogradely labeled varicosities in the ipsilateral GP. At the electron microscopic level, BDA-labeled boutons formed asymmetric (likely excitatory) synapses with small dendrites and spines of GP neurons16. They also showed that the cortico-pallidal projection is topographically organized and that its density is about 10% of that of the corticostriatal projection16. In the lamprey, Stephenson-Jones et al. demonstrated that pallido-habenular neurons receive direct excitatory projections from the pallium (i.e., the homologue of the cerebral cortex in mammals), and suggested that this connection may be part of a distinct reward-evaluation circuit used to select actions across vertebrates17.
Using vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGluT1), as a preferential marker of cortical terminals in the telencephalon18-20, preliminary data from our laboratory strongly support the existence of a direct glutamatergic cortico-pallidal projection in rodents, monkeys and humans21-22. In line with the aforementioned rodent data16, we found that the vGluT1 terminals target almost exclusively dendritic spines and small dendrites in the monkey pallidum, a pattern of synaptic connectivity strikingly different from that of vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (vGluT2) terminals that originate predominantly from the STN22. Another interesting feature of this cortico-pallidal system is the differential pattern of localization of cortical terminals between the two pallidal segments in monkeys and humans21-22. As suggested by the imaging data of Milardi et al., the cortico-pallidal projection to the GPe is more extensive than to GPi7. In the GPe, vGluT1 terminals are distributed along the full extent of the nucleus, while they are exclusively found in the peripallidal region of GPi in monkeys and humans22. Taking into consideration that peripallidal cells in GPi are the main sources of the pallido-habenular projection23-25, these results suggest that the cortical inputs to GPi may preferentially target pallido-habenular neurons, a pattern reminiscent of that recently described in the lamprey17 (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Proposed organization of the cortico-pallidal glutamatergic projection in primates based on findings presented in references 7,16,17,21,22. Glutamatergic cortical afferents innervate the whole extent of the GPe, while they preferentially target peripallidal neurons in the GPi. Sensory-motor cortices are suggested as the main sources of the cortico-pallidal projection, although additional sources cannot be ruled out. Abbreviations: CM: Centromedian nucleus; GPe: Globus pallidus, external segment; GPi: Globus pallidus, internal segment; LHb: Lateral habenular nucleus; PPN: Pedunculopontine nucleus; SNr: Substantia nigra pars reticulate; STN: Subthalamic nucleus; STR: Striatum; VA/VL: Ventral anterior/ventral lateral nucleus.
Altogether these observations strongly suggest the existence of a glutamatergic cortico-pallidal projection in mammals, including humans (Fig. 1). Future studies are needed to characterize more precisely the exact source(s) of this input to GPe or GPi. According to the imaging data of Milardi et al., this projection originates from prefrontal associative regions and sensorimotor cortices7. However, care must be taken in interpreting these findings, because of the massive input prefrontal associative cortices provide to basal forebrain cholinergic neurons26,27. Because some of these cholinergic cells reside along the internal and external medullary lamina, between the two pallidal segments and the putamen, it cannot be ruled out that some of the cortical areas suggested as sources of the cortico-pallidal projection by Milardi et al. are, in fact, targeting cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. Tract-tracing studies in primates are needed to address this issue.
Thus, although preliminary, the findings of Milardi et al. are a timely and important demonstration of the existence of the cortico-pallidal projection in humans, which may provide cortical access to the basal ganglia output nuclei, bypassing the striatum. Obviously, the functional relevance of this projection strongly depends on the source(s) and target(s) of the information that reaches the basal ganglia via this pathway. It will be important to evaluate whether the cortico-pallidal projection supports some of the currently favored roles of the basal ganglia in the control of motor and non-motor behaviors. Finally, it will be important to assess potential changes of this system in disease conditions such Parkinson’s disease or Huntington’s chorea, using animal models of these disease and advanced tract tracing imaging studies, such as CSD.
Acknowledgments
Funding sources: This work was supported by the following grants by the National Institutes of Health: P50 NS071669 (Udall Center grant, TW, YS), R01 NS037948 (YS), and P51 OD011132 (infrastructure grant to the Yerkes National Primate Research Center).
Footnotes
Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest and financial issues to disclose related to the content of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Albin RL, Young AB, Penney JB. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 1989;12:366–375. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.DeLong MR. Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:281–285. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90110-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gerfen CR, Engber TM, Mahan LC, et al. D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-regulated gene expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. Science. 1990;250:1429–1432. doi: 10.1126/science.2147780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sano H, Chiken S, Hikida T, Kobayashi K, Nambu A. Signals through the striatopallidal indirect pathway stop movements by phasic excitation in the substantia nigra. J Neurosci. 2013;33:7583–7594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4932-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nambu A. A new approach to understand the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2005;252(Suppl 4):iv1–iv4. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-4002-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nambu A, Tokuno H, Takada M. Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal ‘hyperdirect’ pathway. Neurosci Res. 2002;43:111–117. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(02)00027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Milardi D, Gaeta M, Marino S, et al. Basal ganglia network by constrained spherical deconvolution: A possible cortico-pallidal pathway? Mov Disord. 2014 doi: 10.1002/mds.25995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tir M, Delmaire C, Besson P, Defebvre L. The value of novel MRI techniques in Parkinson-plus syndromes: diffusion tensor imaging and anatomical connectivity studies. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2014;170:266–276. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2013.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eppenberger P, Andreisek G, Chhabra A. Magnetic resonance neurography: diffusion tensor imaging and future directions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choudhri AF, Chin EM, Blitz AM, Gandhi D. Diffusion tensor imaging of cerebral white matter: technique, anatomy, and pathologic patterns. Radiologic clinics of North America. 2014;52:413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Henderson JM. “Connectomic surgery”: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography as a targeting modality for surgical modulation of neural networks. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6:15. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Milardi D, Bramanti P, Milazzo C, et al. Cortical and Subcortical Connections of the Human Claustrum Revealed In Vivo by Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography. Cereb Cortex. 2013 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tournier JD, Yeh CH, Calamante F, Cho KH, Connelly A, Lin CP. Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data. Neuroimage. 2008;42:617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2007;35:1459–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Naito A, Kita H. The cortico-nigral projection in the rat: an anterograde tracing study with biotinylated dextran amine. Brain Res. 1994;637:317–322. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91252-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naito A, Kita H. The cortico-pallidal projection in the rat: an anterograde tracing study with biotinylated dextran amine. Brain Res. 1994;653:251–257. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90397-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stephenson-Jones M, Kardamakis AA, Robertson B, Grillner S. Independent circuits in the basal ganglia for the evaluation and selection of actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3670–3679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314815110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Raju DV, Ahern TH, Shah DJ, et al. Differential synaptic plasticity of the corticostriatal and thalamostriatal systems in an MPTP-treated monkey model of parkinsonism. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:1647–1658. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hur EE, Zaborszky L. Vglut2 afferents to the medial prefrontal and primary somatosensory cortices: a combined retrograde tracing in situ hybridization. J Comp Neurol. 2005;483:351–373. doi: 10.1002/cne.20444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fremeau RT, Jr, Voglmaier S, Seal RP, Edwards RH. VGLUTs define subsets of excitatory neurons and suggest novel roles for glutamate. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2003.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mathai A, Pare JF, Jenkins S, Smith Y. A vGluT1-positive projection to the primate globus pallidus: Evidence for a cortico-pallidal system in primates? Soc for Neurosci Abstr. 2012 790.06. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smith Y, Mathai A, Pare JF, Moot RC. A putative vGluT1-positive glutamatergic cortico-pallidal projection: Differential organization between the internal and external globus pallidus. Soc for Neurosci Abstr. 2014 248.10. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Parent M, Levesque M, Parent A. Two types of projection neurons in the internal pallidum of primates: single-axon tracing and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Comp Neurol. 2001;439:162–175. doi: 10.1002/cne.1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hong S, Hikosaka O. The globus pallidus sends reward-related signals to the lateral habenula. Neuron. 2008;60:720–729. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hikosaka O, Sesack SR, Lecourtier L, Shepard PD. Habenula: crossroad between the basal ganglia and the limbic system. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11825–11829. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3463-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Russchen FT, Amaral DG, Price JL. The afferent connections of the substantia innominata in the monkey, Macaca fascicularis. J Comp Neurol. 1985;242:1–27. doi: 10.1002/cne.902420102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ. Neural inputs into the nucleus basalis substantia innominata (Ch4) in the rhesus monkey. Brain. 1984;107:253–274. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.1.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
