Abstract
Normally, trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal inner wall endothelial cells within the aqueous humor outflow pathway maintain intraocular pressure within a narrow safe range. Elevation in intraocular pressure, because of the loss of homeostatic regulation by these outflow pathway cells, is the primary risk factor for vision loss due to glaucomatous optic neuropathy. A notable feature associated with glaucoma is outflow pathway cell loss. Using controlled cell loss in ex vivo perfused human outflow pathway organ culture, we developed compelling experimental evidence that this level of cell loss compromises intraocular pressure homeostatic function. This function was restored by repopulation of the model with fresh TM cells. We then differentiated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and used them to repopulate this cell depletion model. These differentiated cells (TM-like iPSCs) became similar to TM cells in both morphology and expression patterns. When transplanted, they were able to fully restore intraocular pressure homeostatic function. This successful transplantation of TM-like iPSCs establishes the conceptual feasibility of using autologous stem cells to restore intraocular pressure regulatory function in open-angle glaucoma patients, providing a novel alternative treatment option. Stem Cells 2015;33:751–761
Keywords: Induced pluripotent stem cells, Autologous stem cell transplantation, Cell transplantation, Experimental models, Somatic stem cells, Stem cell transplantation, Tissue regeneration, Transplantation
Introduction
Glaucoma, an optic neuropathy, is the second leading cause of blindness affecting over 70 million people worldwide 1,2. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the primary risk factor for glaucomatous optic nerve damage and is currently the only treatable factor to ameliorate progression of this damage and the resulting permanent loss of vision 1,3. This is true for all forms of glaucoma, including the most common form, open-angle glaucoma (OAG). In OAG, the angle between the cornea and iris remains open and there is no obvious macroscopic or microscopic obstruction to outflow 3.
Elevated IOP in OAG results from increased resistance to the outflow of aqueous humor and reflects compromised IOP homeostasis. Aqueous inflow is relatively pressure insensitive and the outflow resistance, which can be modulated by outflow pathway cells, actually regulates IOP. IOP homeostasis is a natural process in which sustained pressure changes trigger corrective adjustments in the outflow resistance, thereby maintaining IOP within a narrow safe range 4. This is normally achieved by trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal (SC) inner wall cells within the outflow pathway (Supporting Information Fig. S1A). It is thought that these cells sense sustained IOP changes as mechanical stretching or distortion and adjust the extracellular matrix (ECM) to correct the outflow resistance 4–9. Experimentally, IOP homeostasis is studied in ex vivo perfused anterior segment organ culture 4. Typically, after perfusion in organ culture (Supporting Information Fig. S1B) at normal physiologic pressure, the pressure is doubled to produce a sustained pressure challenge. This triggers the IOP homeostatic response and over several days TM/SC cells reduce the outflow resistance and restore normal IOP 4. This parallels the events in normal eyes in vivo 4. Loss of the IOP homeostatic response is thought to be a hallmark of OAG 4.
Although the molecular etiology of glaucoma remains poorly understood, genetic and some environmental factors are important 7,10–13. No single gene defect is responsible for more than a small fraction of OAG cases. However, reduced TM cellularity is significantly associated with OAG 14. Although no experimental evidence that this TM cell loss is physiologically significant has been presented previously, it has been assumed that this would compromise outflow pathway function, that is, IOP regulation 15. OAG is a disease of aging, with incidence increasing after 40, and the outflow pathway is subjected to numerous cellular insults. The normal outflow pathway exhibits a more modest decline in cellularity with age 14,16,17. Outflow pathway stem cells have been identified, which normally replace lost TM cells 18–20. Presumably, they are unable to keep up with the sustained cell loss associated with OAG 15. Consequently, stem cell therapy to restore lost cellular functions associated with diseases shows particular clinical promise 21–24. Many diseases of aging, including OAG, exhibit selective cell loss 14–16. Although the TM is an immune-privileged site, using autologous stem cells, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from the patient's own fibroblasts, seems optimal. Restoration of compromised tissue function by iPSC replacement therapy is thus of considerable interest 21,23.
Here, we show that controlled outflow pathway cell loss does indeed impair IOP homeostasis, which is the primary function of the outflow pathway 4,8. Replacement of these lost cells with either fresh TM cells or with differentiated iPSCs restores IOP homeostatic function. These studies establish the potential for a regenerative treatment using autologous stem cells to restore the key function to this diseased tissue and thus avoid progressive glaucomatous vision loss.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Saponin detergent was from Sigma Life Sciences (St. Louis, MO; http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science.html?) and Live/Dead Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit and fluorescent-labeled zymosan particles for phagocytosis assay were from Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, (Eugene, OR; http://www.lifetechnologies.com/us/en/home/brands/molecular-probes.html). Aqueous humor was collected from fresh postmortem porcine eyes by inserting a 27 gauge needle through the cornea into the anterior chamber and slowly removing 100–150 µl/eye. This was stored at −20°C and centrifuged at 15,000g for 10 minutes before use. Antibodies used were: CD44 (352-020, Ancell (Bayport, MN; http://www.ancell.com/) and ab65829, Abcam; Cambridge, UK; http://www.abcam.com/); CHI3L1 (ab88847; Abcam); α3 integrin (NBP1-19724, Novus Biologicals; Littleton, CO; http://www.novusbio.com/); KLF4 (ab72543, Abcam); LAMP1 (ab25630, Abcam); Wnt1 (ab15251, Abcam); AQP1 (sc-20810, Santa Cruz; Santa Cruz, CA; http://www.scbt.com/); NANOG (sc-33759, Santa Cruz); OCT3/4 (sc-5279, Santa Cruz); SOX2 (sc-20088, Santa Cruz); and α-tubulin (04-1117, Millipore; Darmstadt, Germany; http://www.emdmillipore.com).
TM Cells
Primary TM cells, isolated from porcine and human eyes, were maintained as previously described using TM cell growth medium (medium-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium [DMEM], a 1:1 mix of high glucose and low glucose media, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum [Hyclone/Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA; http://www.thermoscientific.com/thermo-scientific-hyclone.html?] and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic [100×; Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA; http://www.lifetechnologies.com)]). Primary TM cells were used from passage 2 to 5 25–28.
Perfused Anterior Segment Organ Culture
Perfused human and porcine anterior segment organ culture used modifications of methods previously described 29–32. An illustration of the outflow apparatus using constant pressure perfusion is shown in Supporting Information Figure S1B. Human donor eyes were from Lion's Vision Gift, Portland, Oregon. Human donor tissue protocols were approved by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board and were conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Supporting Information Table S1 contains donor information. Human anterior segments were cultured in stationary organ culture in TM growth medium without serum for 5–7 days to facilitate recovery from postmortem storage 33 before they were mounted in the perfusion apparatus. Porcine anterior segments, obtained within a few hours postmortem, were mounted in the perfusion apparatus immediately. Anterior segments were perfused using a constant 1× pressure (8.34 mmHg) with average flow rates of 1–7 µl/minute for humans and 2–8 µl/minute for porcine as measured gravimetrically. For a sustained 2× pressure challenge to trigger the IOP homeostatic response, the perfusion head was increased to 16.68 mmHg by raising the perfusion reservoir. All perfusions were with TM cell growth medium but without serum. Flow rates were measured by weighing fluid loss from the perfusion reservoir and presented as normalized flow rates normalized to the initial pretreatment baseline flow rate. Outflow facility (C) is defined as the flow rate in µl/minute divided by the perfusion pressure in mmHg.
Live/Dead Assay
The Live/Dead Viability/Cytotoxicity Assay Kit provides a two-color fluorescence cell viability assay in which calcein, acetoxymethyl becomes fluorescent within live cells and nuclear ethidium homodimer (EthD-1) staining indicates cell death. Cells cultured on chamber slides were washed with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated in Live/Dead solution for 30 minutes at 37°C. Cells were then washed with PBS and visualized by confocal microscopy. Live (green) and dead (red nuclei) cells were counted directly and presented as percentage of the cells that were dead.
Porcine and human anterior segments were similarly soaked in Live/Dead solution, washed with PBS, and viewed en Face or after radial or frontal sections had been cut (see below). For anterior segments, simple cell counts are impractical due to the highly convoluted “trabecular” structure where cells extend in every direction and their borders are difficult to see even in Z-stacks on the confocal microscope. Here, we used counts of EthD-1 stained nuclei as dead cells per field. As a proxy for number of live cells per field, we measured the amount of calcein, acetoxymethyl fluorescence per field. Both measurements were per field volume based on X- and Y-length scales and confocal vertical Z-stack height and were evaluated using ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
Microscopic Views and Sectioning
As used herein, en Face indicates that anterior segment was viewed directly from the viewpoint of the anterior chamber looking down at the outer TM beams in the direction of aqueous humor flow (arrow in Supporting Information Fig. S1A). Radial sections were cut vertically along a radius of the anterior segment from the center of the cornea to the outer rim of the sclera. This provides an end-on view of the outflow pathway looking into SC, as is shown in the upper portion of Supporting Information Figure S1A. Frontal sections are cut across a pie-shaped wedge of an anterior segment and are perpendicular to radial sections. The cut begins at the outer TM beams from the anterior chamber viewpoint and passes down through the TM, through SC and then out the front of the eye between the cornea and sclera. The frontal cut bisects SC and the cut surface viewed end-on provides a view of an arc of SC with the cornea/sclera below and the TM above 34.
Saponin Treatment of Cultured TM Cells
Porcine TM cells, grown on glass chamber slides for 48 hours until confluent, were washed with PBS and exposed for 5 minutes to saponin (0.001%, 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, or 0.1%) dissolved in serum-free medium-glucose DMEM. Saponin was removed and cells were rinsed gently with PBS and subjected to Live/Dead staining. Twenty images were captured per treatment condition and live, dead, and total cells were counted in each image.
Saponin Treatment of Perfused Anterior Segment Organ Cultures
After anterior segments were stabilized at 1× pressure for 24–48 hours in the perfusion system, perfusion fluid was replaced with saponin (0.01%) in serum-free TM growth medium. This was perfused-in and the flow was stopped for 7 or 10 minutes, for human or porcine, respectively. Saponin was then exchanged-out with serum-free TM growth medium and flow was resumed at 1× pressure. Baseline flow was re-established for 24 hours before the pressure head was doubled (2×) by raising the perfusion reservoir to produce a sustained IOP homeostatic pressure challenge.
Human iPSCs and Control Cells
Human iPSCs (DF6–9-9T.B), derived from dermal foreskin fibroblasts, were from WiCell Laboratories (Madison, WI; http://www.wicell.org/) and were grown and maintained as per the company's instructions. Normal adult human dermal fibroblasts (DF) were from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA; http://www.atcc.org) and cultured according to their instructions. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were a gift from Dr. Nabil Alkayed (Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR), and were cultured according to the supplier's instructions (Life Technologies).
Generation of Embryoid Bodies and Differentiation of iPSCs
To generate uniform small size embryoid bodies (EBs) on a large scale, medium sized undifferentiated iPSC colonies were detached from six-well plates by treatment with Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies: San Diego, CA; http://www.accutase.com/). Cells were transferred to AggreWell plates and incubated in AggreWell medium (Stem Cell Technologies: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; http://www.stemcell.com) for 24 hours. The EBs from AggreWell plates were then transferred to six-well plates and differentiation was initiated.
EBs were cultured on TM cell-derived ECM in a mixture of standard TM cell growth medium, AggreWell medium, and TM cell conditioned medium (25%, 50%, and 25%, respectively; which we designated as DiffMedium). The TM-derived ECM was obtained by culturing porcine TM cells for 7 days to produce an extensive ECM. All the TM cells were removed by treatment for 1 hour with 0.1% saponin followed by extensive washing with PBS. ECM was then incubated for several days in PBS before use. No cells could be detected after this time. The conditioned medium was collected after 48 hours from cultured serum-free human TM cells and centrifuged at 15,000xg for 15 minutes. The EBs were grown on TM ECM in DiffMedium, which was changed every other day, and maintained in culture for 30 days. After 30 days, the differentiated cells were cultured in 100% TM cell growth medium and passaged 1:3 with trypsin, similar to TM cells, for up to seven passages.
Western Immunoblotting and Immunohistochemistry
Human TM, iPS, and TM-like iPSCs were grown on six-well plates until confluent. Cell lysates were collected using a RIPA buffer mixed with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Protein concentrations were measured using a BCA kit from Pierce Biotechnology (Thermo Scientific; Rockford, IL; http://www.piercenet.com). Loading buffer with 0.1 M dithiothreitol was added to the lysates and samples were boiled for 15 minutes. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were loaded per lane in SDS/PAGE gels. Gels were run at 120 V for 90 minutes and wet transferred at 4°C to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Non-fat dry milk (5%) was used as a blocking buffer. Primary antibodies were used at 1:1,000 dilution in PBS with 0.05% Tween and incubated at 4°C overnight. Secondary antibodies, both rabbit and mouse, were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals (Limerick, PA; http://www.rockland-inc.com/), diluted in PBS, and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature.
For immunohistochemistry, human TM, iPS, and TM-like cells were grown on Lab-Tec II CC2-coated glass chamber slides (Nalge Nunc, Inc.; Rochester, NY; http://www.thermoscientific.com/en/about-us/general-landing-page/nalgene-labware.html), until 60%–80% confluent. They were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. Slides were blocked in 5% normal goat serum in PBS, and then primary antibodies for the cell markers were added at a 1:200 dilution. Both Alexa Fluor 488- and 595-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) were used at a 1:500 dilution.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Human TM, iPS, and TM-like cells were grown on six-well plates until confluent. Cells were harvested and total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Life Technologies) using the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription using SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) followed the manufacturer's procedure. Primers for Wnt1, CHI3L1, α3 integrin, AQP1, KLF4, NANOG, SOX2, and OCT3/4 were designed using the integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) website (http://www.idtdna.com). Primer sequences are listed in Supporting Information Table S2. Ribosomal (18S) RNA was used as a housekeeping gene. The DNA Engine quantitative RT-PCR machine (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA; http://www.bio-rad.com/) and RT2 SYBR Green qPCR master mixes (Qiagen; Vento, Netherlands; http://www.qiagen.com/) were used for real-time PCR according to the manufacturer's protocol. The threshold cycle (Ct) was determined for each sample and used to quantify the relative mRNA levels standardized to the measured iPSC counts. Samples were then run on agarose gels for size verification.
Phagocytosis Assay for TM-Like iPSCs, iPSCs, and Human TM Cells
Fluorescein-labeled zymosan bioparticles and opsonizing reagent were from Invitrogen /Molecular Probes. TM-like iPS, iPS, and human TM cells were cultured on chamber slides until they were 60% confluent. Zymosan particles were opsonized according to the manufacturer's instructions and then incubated with each cell type for an hour at 37°C. Cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, perforated with 0.3% Triton X-100 and stained for LAMP1, a lysosomal marker (1:500 dilution) to establish internalization. Using confocal microscopy, the colocalization of zymosan particles with LAMP1 antibody in Qdot-labeled cells was determined.
Transplantation of Cells into Saponin-Treated Anterior Segments
All the transplantation experiments were conducted similarly. The cells to be transplanted were harvested by trypsin treatment, rinsed thoroughly, and labeled with 3 µl of QDot nanoparticles (Qtracker 655 Cell Labeling Kit; Life Technologies) by incubating them together for an hour at 37°C. Cells were then washed thoroughly to eliminate residual particles and visualized by confocal microscopy to verify nanoparticle uptake and cell numbers were counted.
Human anterior segments were perfused at 1× pressure for 48 hours to establish baseline flow and then treated with saponin for 7 minutes as detailed earlier to remove approximately 1/3 of the TM cells. Saponin was rinsed out extensively and flow was restarted at 1× pressure (8.34 mmHg) for 24 hours. To test for IOP homeostatic responsiveness with a sustained pressure challenge, perfusion pressure was increased to 2× (16.68 mmHg) for 48 hours for both control and saponin-treated anterior segments. Flow was then stopped, the chamber was inverted, cells were injected, and perfused in at 0.5× pressure for 2 hours. To allow the cells to attach, the flow was then stopped overnight. The flow was then resumed at 1× pressure for 24 hours. With the cells attached to the TM, a second sustained pressure challenge was then initiated to test for recovery of the IOP homeostatic response by increasing perfusion pressure to 2×. The IOP homeostatic capability was assessed over several days and the experiments were terminated.
For all transplantations, 300,000 QDot-labeled cells were added per anterior chamber. This included: primary cultured human TM cells, differentiated TM-like iPSCs, EBs mock-differentiated with 5% aqueous humor, normal DF, and HUVECs.
Statistical Analysis
One-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple testing correction or unpaired t tests were used to determine statistical significance.
Results
Cellular Loss with Saponin Treatment
Previously, a detailed study demonstrated that eyes from glaucoma patients exhibited significant reduction in cell density within the outflow pathway, when compared with normal aged eyes 14,16,17. To create a relatively uniform and controlled level of cell death in normal aged eyes for our studies, we evaluated a number of possible cell depletion agents. The detergent saponin produced a compromise between effective cell death with minimal ECM and outflow pathway structural disruption. To obtain dosages, saponin was applied to cultured porcine TM cells at different concentrations: 0% (vehicle control), 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, and 0.1%, all in serum-free DMEM (Supporting Information Fig. S2). Saponin at 0.05% killed all the TM cells. When saponin was applied at 0.01%, it produced death in 36% ± 9% of TM cells, whereas 0.001% killed 20% ± 3% of cells. Consequently, 0.01% saponin for 7 minutes was selected for human anterior segments to simulate the approximate level of cell loss detected in glaucomatous eyes 14.
The most widely accepted experimental model for these studies is perfused anterior segment organ culture (Supporting Information Fig. S1B) 29. Some dead cells were detected in untreated porcine anterior segments, and this was designated basal cell death. However, saponin induced significantly more cell death (Supporting Information Fig. S3). Saponin (0.01%) was injected into the flow line of perfused human anterior segments mounted in the ocular perfusion system (Supporting Information Fig. S1B) and incubated in the TM for 7 minutes before being rinsed out. The live/dead assay was used to determine whether saponin affected the viability of human TM cells and this was viewed in frontal sections of anterior segments (Fig. 1B–1E). The TM has several zones of cells, and saponin was able to penetrate and kill cells in all zones down into the deepest zone, the juxtacanalicular region or JCT (Fig. 1D, 1E), which is the region thought to be responsible for IOP homeostasis 4,8,35. Saponin treatment induced cell death although more live than dead cells still populated the TM, indicating that saponin's effect at this concentration was partial (Fig. 1F, 1G). Saponin-treated anterior segments contained considerably more dead TM cells than vehicle-treated anterior segments (Fig. 1G). Furthermore, comparing the live cells per three-dimensional field in glaucomatous and saponin-treated eyes relative to normal eyes revealed a very similar pattern, that is, 67.42 and 66.42 live cells per field, respectively (Fig. 1H). Thus, this level of saponin treatment induced changes in cell counts that roughly approximate those found in glaucoma.
Saponin Impairs the IOP Homeostatic Response Which Is Restored by TM Cell Repopulation
To examine the influence of saponin treatment on outflow and on the IOP homeostatic response, we measured the effects of 0.01% saponin treatment on this process (Fig. 1J). Anterior segments were perfused at 1× perfusion pressure until the flow had stabilized. One anterior segment from paired human eyes was then exposed to saponin and the other exposed to vehicle, both for 7 minutes. Saponin or vehicle was then rinsed-out and perfusion was restarted at 1× perfusion pressure. After 24 hours, perfusion pressures were increased to 2× (16.68 mmHg), which serves as a sustained IOP homeostatic pressure challenge 4. Flow rates at 1× were not changed by saponin treatment and they doubled immediately after the pressure was elevated to 2× in both treatment and control anterior segments. However, over several days, the TM cells of the vehicle-treated anterior segments exhibited a typical IOP homeostatic response, that is, they slowly reduced the outflow resistance resulting in a gradual and significant increase in outflow rate (Fig. 1J—solid black line). The saponin-treated anterior segments were not able to produce this IOP homeostatic resistance adjustment, but instead remained at approximately the initial 2× flow rate (Fig. 1J—dashed line). Saponin did not have any direct effect on the outflow resistance, but the consequent cell reduction did degrade the ability of cells to modify the resistance in response to the pressure challenge.
Although anterior segments exposed to saponin lost the ability to adjust the outflow resistance when subjected to a 2× pressure challenge, this capability was regained when cultured human TM cells were added back and allowed to attach and integrate into the anterior segments (Fig. 2A–2C). After saponin-treatment and assessment of response to a 2× pressure challenge, human TM cells that had been labeled with red fluorescent QDots for identification purposes were injected into the perfusion line, allowed to flow into the TM at 0.5× pressure for 2 hours, and then the pressure was reduced to 0 mmHg overnight to facilitate cell attachment. Perfusion pressure was then reinitiated, maintained at 1× to re-establish the baseline flow, then increased to 2×, and the flow was measured for several days to assess capability to exhibit an IOP homeostatic response (Fig. 2D). When examined by confocal microscopy (Fig. 2B, 2C), QDot-labeled transplanted TM cells were observed throughout the TM. The transplanted cells appeared to have attached to the TM beams and to inner layers of TM including the JCT (Fig. 2B, 2C). Although the IOP homeostatic response to 2× pressure was lost after saponin treatment, it was regained after the TM cells were added back and allowed to integrate into the open areas (Fig. 2D).
iPSC EBs Differentiate to be Similar to Human TM Cells
To use the iPSCs, they were differentiated to embryoid bodies, and then to a TM-like cell. Since patient-specific TM cells could only be obtained by an invasive patient surgery, autologous skin iPSCs would be a much preferred source of replacement cells 15. After extensive evaluation of possible methods to differentiate iPSCs (manuscript in preparation), we found conditions that seemed usable. The EBs developed from iPSCs became differentiated or more “TM-like” in appearance after sustained exposure to ECM and conditioned medium, both produced by cultured primary human TM cells. Other treatment combinations were less effective. These TM-like iPSCs resembled human TM cells morphologically (Supporting Information Fig. S4), which have a relatively distinctive appearance 28. Expression of typical stem cell markers, NANOG, OCT3/4, SOX2, and KLF4, 22,23,35 was much higher for iPSCs and negligible for differentiated TM-like iPSCs or human TM cells (Fig. 3A, 3C, 3D). Although there is no specific cell marker for TM cells, CHI3L1, Wnt1, α3 integrin, and AQP1 are typically expressed by TM cells 36–41 and are not expressed or are only lightly expressed by iPSCs (Fig. 3B–3D). The TM-like iPSC expression pattern resembled that of human TM cells much more closely than that of iPSCs (Fig. 3A–3D).
Phagocytic Capabilities of Differentiated iPSCs
The outer portion of the TM acts as a filter to remove cells and debris from aqueous humor and is therefore very active in phagocytosis 42,43. However, iPSCs are not effective at phagocytosis. Hence, we examined whether or not the differentiated TM-like iPSCs had acquired phagocytic capability. We exposed iPS, TM, and differentiated TM-like iPSCs to fluorescent-labeled zymosan particles (red) and immunostained afterward for the lysosomal marker LAMP1 (green), to verify that particles were actually internalized and not just absorbed to the cell surface. The results showed that many of the zymosan particles colocalized with LAMP1, indicating internalization, for both human TM and TM-like iPSCs, but not for iPSCs, which exhibit essentially no lysosomes or zymosan uptake (Fig. 4).
Transplanted TM-Like iPSCs Integrated into the TM and Restored IOP Homeostasis
Differentiated TM-like iPSCs were transplanted into saponin-treated human anterior segments (Fig. 5A–5C). The saponin treatment, transplantation process, and pressure challenges were the same as conducted earlier for cultured TM cells (Fig. 2) and detailed in Materials and Methods and outlined in Figure 2A. Many of the 300,000 QDot-labeled differentiated TM-like iPSCs attached and became integrated into the TM. Frontal sections (Fig. 5A, 5B) show that the transplanted cells were found throughout the TM, including the deepest JCT layer, which is thought to be the location of the outflow resistance 8,44. The dashed lines around the Qdot-containing transplanted cells (Fig. 5B) were drawn based on carefully scanning through the confocal Z-stacks to define the CD44-labeled cell surfaces.
After saponin treatment, the 2× pressure challenge did not evoke an IOP homeostatic resistance adjustment, but after the differentiated TM-like iPSCs were transplanted, a second 2× pressure challenge did result in a robust resistance adjustment (Fig. 5C). Similar studies were conducted with transplantation of a selection of several types of control cells (Fig. 5D–5F) or where no cells were added (Fig. 5G). These control cells included DF (Fig. 5D), which are the cell type originally used to develop the iPSCs. Here, the second pressure challenge did not produce an outflow resistance reduction, but actually the DF addition reduced outflow directly. Another control cell, EBs that had been exposed to 5% aqueous humor alone in a parallel control differentiation process did not restore the IOP homeostatic resistance adjustment (Fig. 5E). Addition of HUVECs, which are an endothelial cell as are TM cells (Fig. 5F), or the sham addition (no cells at all) (Fig. 5G) also failed to restore the IOP homeostatic response.
Discussion
It has long been suspected that the loss of outflow pathway cells observed in OAG would exacerbate the effects of other causal factors associated with this disease 14–17. Here, we show the first experimental evidence that outflow pathway cell depletion in the approximate range observed in glaucoma does indeed compromise the function of the outflow pathway, which is maintaining IOP homeostasis 4,8. Partial repopulation of the cell-depleted tissue with cultured TM cells is able to restore this key outflow pathway function, thereby further strengthening this evidence. In and of itself, this is a major development in understanding the etiology of glaucoma and, perhaps more importantly, understanding why most people do not develop glaucoma even at advanced ages 1,2. Although TM cell loss occurs in normal aging 16,17, that level of loss is not sufficient to curtail IOP homeostatic function 1,3,4,7,8.
Glaucoma is therapeutically a difficult disease in several respects. Current drug therapies all rely on reducing aqueous humor inflow or in diverting outflow through the alternative or uveoscleral outflow pathway 3. In both cases, since a key function of aqueous humor is to bathe and nourish the avascular lens, cornea, and TM, reduced aqueous humor circulation through the conventional TM outflow pathway will further exacerbate the condition of the diseased tissue 1,3,7. In addition, therapeutic compliance remains a very serious issue with published estimates of 27.8%, 50%, or even 75% noncompliance 45–48. This is primarily due to side effects and the requirement for daily self-application of eye drops. Furthermore, these drug treatments often become ineffective, forcing laser treatments or invasive surgical interventions. Although much of glaucoma is of genetic origin, it has become clear that no single genetic locus is responsible for more than a small portion of glaucoma 10–13,49. To date, these various genetic causes of glaucoma have not converged on a single etiologic pathway. Thus, genetic or gene therapy-based resolutions to glaucoma will likely need to be developed individually for many different genetic problems.
These issues and the association of outflow pathway cell loss with glaucoma caused by many genetic or even environmental causes 14 provide the conceptual basis for developing a stem cell therapy for OAG 15. In examining the IOP homeostatic response to cell transplantation, only added TM cells and differentiated TM-like iPSCs were able to restore the IOP homeostatic response in anterior segments partially depleted of TM cells. Control cell transplantations using DF, embryoid bodies that had been mock-differentiated, HUVECs, or mock transplantation (no cells added) were all ineffectual in restoring IOP homeostasis.
Our demonstration that TM cell reduction eliminates the IOP homeostatic response and that TM cell replacement restores this central outflow pathway function provides a strong impetus to develop this new treatment paradigm. Although the outflow pathway resides within an immune-privileged region and is relatively insensitive to normal immune rejection phenomenon, this privilege is clearly not absolute 50,51. Hence, using autologous stem cells seems particularly advantageous. Stem cells, such as iPSCs, which can be developed from patient-specific skin fibroblasts, are thus ideal for this study 15,22–24,35.
Summary
We demonstrate herein that reduction of outflow pathway cell density compromises IOP homeostasis and that repopulation with TM cells restores this key function. More importantly, iPSCs can be differentiated to resemble TM cells in many key ways and they can restore the primary TM cell function, maintaining IOP homeostasis. This is thus a major conceptual step toward developing a stem cell therapy for OAG.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ruth Phinney (Lions Vision Gift, Portland, Oregon) for facilitating the procurement of human donor eyes. This work was supported by NIH Grants EY021800 (M.J.K.), EY003279 (T.S.A.), EY008247 (T.S.A.), and EY010572 (T.S.A.), by the University of Jordan (DWA), and by an unrestricted grant to the Casey Eye Institute from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York.
Author Contributions
M.J.K. and T.S.A.: conceived the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the studies, and wrote, read, and approved the manuscript; X.L. and E.I.R.: contributed to and performed the research, participated in the design and interpretation of the studies, and read and approved the manuscript; D.W.A.: contributed to and performed the research, wrote the manuscript, participated in the design and interpretation of the studies, and read and approved the manuscript.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011;377:1367–1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morrison JC, Pollack IP, editors. Glaucoma: Science and Practice. New York, Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2003. pp. 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Acott TS, Kelley MJ, Keller KE. Intraocular pressure homeostasis: Maintaining balance in a high-pressure environment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014;30:94–101. doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0185. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tamm ER. The trabecular meshwork outflow pathways: Structural and functional aspects. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:648–655. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Overby DR, Stamer WD, Johnson M. The changing paradigm of outflow resistance generation: Towards synergistic models of the JCT and inner wall endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:656–670. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stamer WD, Acott TS. Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:135–143. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff23e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Acott TS, Kelley MJ. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork (Review) Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:543–561. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Keller K, Aga M, Bradley J. Extracellular matrix turnover and outflow resistance. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:676–682. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.023. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Allingham RR, Liu Y, Rhee DJ. The genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma: A review. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:837–844. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gemenetzi M, Yang Y, Lotery AJ. Current concepts on primary open-angle glaucoma genetics: A contribution to disease pathophysiology and future treatment. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:355–369. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fan BJ, Wiggs JL. Glaucoma: Genes, phenotypes, and new directions for therapy. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3064–3072. doi: 10.1172/JCI43085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ray K, Mookherjee S. Molecular complexity of primary open angle glaucoma: Current concepts. J Genet. 2009;88:451–467. doi: 10.1007/s12041-009-0065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alvarado J, Murphy C, Juster R. Trabecular meshwork cellularity in primary open-angle glaucoma and nonglaucomatous normals. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:564–579. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kelley MJ, Rose AY, Keller KE. Stem cells in the trabecular meshwork: Present and future promises. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:747–751. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.024. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alvarado J, Murphy C, Polansky J. Age-related changes in trabecular meshwork cellularity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:714–727. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grierson I, Howes RC. Age-related depletion of the cell population in the human trabecular meshwork. Eye. 1987;1(Pt 2):204–210. doi: 10.1038/eye.1987.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Acott TS, Samples JR, Bradley JMB. Trabecular repopulation by anterior trabecular meshwork cells after laser trabeculoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90805-2. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Du Y, Roh DS, Mann MM. Multipotent stem cells from trabecular meshwork become phagocytic TM cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1566–1575. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9134. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Du Y, Yun H, Yang E. Stem cells from trabecular meshwork home to TM tissue in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1450–1459. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11056. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Okano H, Yamanaka S. iPS cell technologies: Significance and applications to CNS regeneration and disease. Mol Brain. 2014;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-7-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cells: Past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:678–684. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yamanaka S. Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alvarado JA, Wood I, Polansky JR. Human trabecular cells. II. Growth pattern and ultrastructural characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;23:464–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alexander JP, Samples JR, Van Buskirk EM. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and inhibitor by human trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:172–180. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Polansky JR, Weinreb R, Alvarado JA. Studies on human trabecular cells propagated in vitro. Vision Res. 1981;21:155–160. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90151-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Polansky JR, Weinreb RN, Baxter JD. Human trabecular cells. I. Establishment in tissue culture and growth characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18:1043–1049. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Johnson DH, Tschumper RC. Human trabecular meshwork organ culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:945–953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnson DH, Tschumper RC. The effect of organ culture on human trabecular meshwork. Exp Eye Res. 1989;49:113–127. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(89)90080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bradley JMB, Kelley MJ, Zhu XH. Effects of mechanical stretching on trabecular matrix metalloproteinases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1505–1513. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bradley JMB, Vranka JA, Colvis CM. Effects of matrix metalloproteinase activity on outflow in perfused human organ culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2649–2658. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Acott TS, Kingsley PD, Samples JR. Human trabecular meshwork organ culture: Morphology and glycosaminoglycan synthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:90–100. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lu Z, Overby DR, Scott PA. The mechanism of increasing outflow facility by rho-kinase inhibition with Y-27632 in bovine eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.10.018. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tomarev SI, Wistow G, Raymond V. Gene expression profile of the human trabecular meshwork: NEIBank sequence tag analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2588–2596. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1099. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stamer WD, Peppel K, O'Donnell ME. Expression of aquaporin-1 in human trabecular meshwork cells: Role in resting cell volume. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1803–1811. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stamer WD, Snyder RW, Smith BL. Localization of aquaporin CHIP in the human eye: Implications in the pathogenesis of glaucoma and other disorders of ocular fluid balance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3867–3872. et al. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liton PB, Luna C, Challa P. Genome-wide expression profile of human trabecular meshwork cultured cells, nonglaucomatous and primary open angle glaucoma tissue. Mol Vis. 2006;12:774–790. et al. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liton PB, Liu X, Stamer WD. Specific targeting of gene expression to a subset of human trabecular meshwork cells using the chitinase 3-like 1 promoter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:183–190. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0330. et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gonzalez P, Epstein DL, Borras T. Characterization of gene expression in human trabecular meshwork using single-pass sequencing of 1060 clones. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3678–3693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnson M, Erickson K. Mechanisms and routes of aqueous humor drainage. In: Albert D, Jakobiec F, editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000. pp. 2577–2595. . In:, eds. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Johnson DH, Richardson TM, Epstein DL. Trabecular meshwork recovery after phagocytic challenge. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:1121–1130. doi: 10.3109/02713688909000037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Johnson M. ‘What controls aqueous humour outflow resistance?'. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:545–557. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tsai JC. A comprehensive perspective on patient adherence to topical glaucoma therapy. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:S30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kholdebarin R, Campbell RJ, Jin YP. Multicenter study of compliance and drop administration in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43:454–461. doi: 10.1139/i08-076. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vandenbroeck S, De Geest S, Dobbels F. Prevalence and correlates of self-reported nonadherence with eye drop treatment: The Belgian Compliance Study in Ophthalmology (BCSO) J Glaucoma. 2011;20:414–421. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f7b10e. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robin A, Grover DS. Compliance and adherence in glaucoma management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59 suppl:S93–96. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raymond V. Molecular genetics of the glaucomas: Mapping of the first five “GLC” loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:227–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Griffith TS, Brunner T, Fletcher SM. Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege. Science. 1995;270:1189–1192. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.1189. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Streilein JW. Anterior chamber associated immune deviation: The privilege of immunity in the eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;35:67–73. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(90)90048-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.