Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Immunology Research logoLink to Journal of Immunology Research
. 2015 Mar 1;2015:347903. doi: 10.1155/2015/347903

Effective Binding of a Phosphatidylserine-Targeting Antibody to Ebola Virus Infected Cells and Purified Virions

S D Dowall 1,*, V A Graham 1, K Corbin-Lickfett 2, C Empig 2, K Schlunegger 2, C B Bruce 1, L Easterbrook 1, R Hewson 1
PMCID: PMC4359806  PMID: 25815346

Abstract

Ebola virus is responsible for causing severe hemorrhagic fevers, with case fatality rates of up to 90%. Currently, no antiviral or vaccine is licensed against Ebola virus. A phosphatidylserine-targeting antibody (PGN401, bavituximab) has previously been shown to have broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Here, we demonstrate that PGN401 specifically binds to Ebola virus and recognizes infected cells. Our study provides the first evidence of phosphatidylserine-targeting antibody reactivity against Ebola virus.

1. Introduction

The family Filoviridae includes two genera, Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus. The genus Ebolavirus includes five species (Bundibugyo ebolavirus, Reston ebolavirus, Sudan ebolavirus, Taï Forest ebolavirus, and Zaire ebolavirus). Ebolavirus strain Ebola (EBOV) is the only member of the Zaire species of Ebolavirus [1, 2]. EBOV first came to medical attention in 1976 with a disease outbreak in Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)) [3]. Sporadic outbreaks of Ebola virus disease have occurred naturally since then, sometimes characterised by large epidemics, for example, in the town of Kikwit, DRC, in 1995 (315 cases and 244 deaths) [4]. Since 2001 epidemics have been occurring with increasing frequency which may be related to the increasing encroachment of human beings on tropical rain forests and once-isolated rural villages [5].

Human EBOV infection results in high lethality. Indeed, case-fatality rates of the African EBOV are as high as 90%, with no prophylaxis or treatment available. Consequently the virus is classified as a Risk Group 4 agent, mandating the use of high containment laboratory infrastructure for work with infectious materials. Further classification as a Category A Priority Pathogen by the US NIH/NIAID reflects concern of its potential use as a bioweapon [6]. New therapeutic strategies against EBOV infection are urgently required. Currently these range from antisense technology (chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides that interfere with the translation of viral mRNA) [7, 8] to therapeutic antibodies against specific EBOV proteins [9–11]. While these therapies rely on viral specific interactions, an alternative host-targeted antibody therapy enabling a broader viral specificity has recently gained favour. Bavituximab (PGN401) is a monoclonal human-mouse chimeric antibody. The Fv region was obtained from the mouse IgG3 monoclonal antibody 3G4 specific towards phosphatidylserine (PS) [12] which was subsequently joined to human IgG1κ constant regions [13]. In healthy cells, PS resides predominantly in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, where it is inaccessible to circulating antibodies, but translocates to the outer leaflet and externalizes upon cell injury or death [14]. Surface exposure of PS is then accompanied by cell death through apoptosis [15], mediated in part through recognition by T cell immunoglobulin mucin proteins [16]. PS exposure is now accepted as a ubiquitous phenomenon of apoptosis that is independent of cell type and the cell death-inducing trigger [17]. PGN401 was primarily used in mouse models of cancer, which have tumor vasculature with PS expression on endothelial cells [18]. It appears that 3G4 does not bind PS directly but through complexes of the PS-binding plasma protein β2-glycoprotein 1 (β2GP1) [19]. The antibody binds to PS-expressing membranes by crosslinking two molecules of β2GP1 bound to PS on the membrane [19]. PGN401 has successfully completed several clinical trials, including Phase I in patients with advanced solid tumors [20] and Phase II in patients with advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [13]. It is now entering Phase III trials for NSCLC [21]. Therefore, PGN401 is known to be safe in human studies and the pharmacokinetics of the antibody has been studied.

Surface exposure of PS antigen is also a consequence of viral infection through virus-induced apoptosis events. These also result in a loss of lipid asymmetry due to the translocation of PS from the inner to the outer layer of the infected cells' plasma membrane [22]. Antibodies binding the exposed PS appear to limit viral infection by initiating the removal of enveloped viruses from the bloodstream through the induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) which ultimately eliminates virus infected cells [22, 23]. Whilst PS relocation is not the final step in apoptosis, cells expressing it are still likely to be actively producing virus so opsonizing them for ADCC may limit or slow the progression of infection. Major advantages of PGN401 over other antibody treatments against EBOV include specificity for infected cells and independence of virus escape mutations [24]. Antibodies are also attractive anti-infective therapeutics due to their exquisite specificity and their ability to recruit additional immune system components such as complement and natural killer cells, facilitating pathogen inactivation and removal [22]. Most of the antiviral work with PGN401 has been undertaken with hepatitis C virus [25] and has extended to clinical trials [26, 27]. In 2008, Soares et al. reported the efficacy of PGN401 in guinea pigs infected with Pichindé virus [23], a model that closely resembles Lassa fever in humans [28]. Therefore, it was hypothesized that PGN401 may also have therapeutic potential for other hemorrhagic fever viruses. In this report, we evaluate the in vitro efficacy of PGN401 to bind to EBOV virions and EBOV-infected cells.

2. Methods

2.1. Virus

EBOV isolate ME718 was used in this work. This was originally isolated during an outbreak in October 1976 [3] in Yambuku, Mongala Province, in what is currently the northern Democratic Republic of the Congo, and simultaneously reported in three publications [29–31]. Virus stocks used for this work were grown in VeroE6 cells (European Collection of Cell Cultures, UK) cultured in Leibovitz's L15 (L15) media containing 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), and aliquots were stored at −80°C. Virus titres were determined by 100-fold dilution with L15 media without any FCS added. 100 μL of each dilution was overlaid onto semiconfluent cell monolayers in four replicate 12.5 cm2 tissue culture flasks and left to adsorb for 1 hour. A volume of 5 mL media was then added and cells were incubated at 37°C for 6-7 days. Cytopathic effects were observed using microscopy, and the results from each dilution were used to calculate 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) using the Reed-Muench method [32].

2.2. Flow Cytometry Assay

VeroE6 cells in 12.5 cm2 tissue culture flasks were infected with EBOV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 0.5. After five days of infection, the media were removed and the cell monolayer washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). For staining with PGN401, the antibody was used at a concentration of 1 μg/mL in flow cytometry buffer consisting of 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4 (Sigma, UK), 140 mM NaCl (Sigma, UK), and 2.5 mM CaCl2 (Sigma, UK) with 50% FCS (Invitrogen, UK). To each flask, 1 mL antibody suspension was added and left on ice for 30 minutes. Unbound antibody was removed by washing with PBS, and cells detached using TrypLE Express solution (Invitrogen, UK) with incubation at 37°C to aid enzymatic activity. Once detached, the cell suspension was transferred to cell culture tubes used for flow cytometry staining. Cells were washed twice with flow cytometry buffer by addition of 2 mL buffer and centrifugation at 400 ×g for 5 minutes. Anti-EBOV antibody (clone FE25, Lifespan Biosciences, USA) was diluted to 100 μg/mL in flow cytometry buffer containing 50% FCS, and 100 μL was added to each cell pellet. Tubes were incubated on ice for 30 minutes to allow binding. Unbound antibody was removed by washing twice with flow cytometry buffer as previously described. Secondary antibody consisted of Alexa-Fluor 647 goat anti-human IgG (Invitrogen, UK) or Alexa-Fluor 488/647 goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, UK) for detection of the PGN401 and anti-EBOV antibodies, respectively. Secondary antibody was diluted at 1 : 400 with flow cytometry buffer containing 50% FCS, and 100 μL of the appropriate antibody was added to each tube. Tubes were incubated on ice for 30 minutes to allow binding to occur. Unbound antibody was removed by washing twice with flow cytometry buffer as previously described. Cell pellets were fixed in flow cytometry fixation buffer that contained 4% paraformaldehyde (eBioscience, UK). Tubes were fumigated overnight with formalin vapor before removal from the CL4 laboratory. Samples were run on a Beckman Coulter FC500 flow cytometer and analyzed using Cytomics CXP software. Cells were gated using a forward scatter/side scatter density plot. Binding of Alexa Fluor 488 and 647 antibodies was determined by a histogram of fluorescence from the FL1 and FL4 channels, respectively. For dual color staining, a quadrant plot was created to identify single- and dual-labeled cells.

2.3. Immunofluorescence Assay

VeroE6 cells (European Collection of Cell Cultures, UK) were cultured on 8-well LabTek II chamber slides (Thermo Scientific Nunc, UK) and infected with EBOV for 5 days. Antibody preparations of PGN401 and a positive anti-EBOV monoclonal antibody control (clone FE25, Abcam, UK) were diluted with PBS to a concentration of 100 μg/mL before 500 μL was added to the relevant chambers of the slide. PBS alone and isotype antibodies (Erbitux and mouse IgG2a (Abcam, UK)) were used as negative controls. After 1 hour at 37°C the cells were washed 3 times by immersion in PBS and dried. For detection, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-human antibody (Invitrogen, UK) was diluted at 1 : 400 and used at 500 μL per well. After 1 hour at 37°C the cells were washed 3 times with PBS and dried. Slides were fixed with a 4% formaldehyde solution before removal from the Containment Level 4 laboratory. Cells were microscopically observed using an EVOS FL imaging system using a GFP imaging cube (Life Technologies, UK).

2.4. ELISA Assay

For coating with live EBOV virions, fluid from infected cultures were clarified by centrifugation at 400 ×g for 10 minutes. The supernatant fluid was transferred onto sucrose solution (20% sucrose in TH buffer) and particles were purified by ultracentrifugation at 25,500 rpm at 4°C in a SW28 rotor (Beckman Coulter, UK). The sucrose cushion and supernatant fluid was discarded and the pellet air-dried for 10 minutes before resuspending in 3 mL PBS. A 660 nm protein assay (Thermo Scientific Pierce, UK) was used to determine the protein concentration in the purified stocks. Stocks were diluted with PBS to a concentration of 10 μg/mL and 100 μL added to wells of a microplate (Immulon 1B, VWR, UK). For a virus negative control, PBS alone was added. Plates were left overnight at 4°C to allow binding to occur. For coating with PS, hexane solvent (Sigma, UK) was used to dilute PS to a concentration of 5 μg/mL and 100 μL added per well of the microplate. For an antigen negative control, hexane alone was added. Plates were incubated at room temperature in a fume cabinet until the hexane had evaporated and the plates were dry. To assess binding to EBOV glycoprotein, recombinant Zaire ebolavirus glycoprotein minus the transmembrane region (rZEBOV GPdTM, IBT Bioservices, US) was diluted to 1 μg/mL with carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (Sigma, UK) and 100 μL added per well of a microplate. To remove unbound antigen, plates were washed with five washes of 200 μL PBS per well. To each well, 200 μL of protein-free blocking buffer (PFBB, Pierce, UK) was added and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C. Blocking buffer was removed by washing five times with PBS. Dilutions of PGN401 were made in low-binding microplates (Corning, UK) with binding buffer, consisting of 10% dialyzed FCS (Invitrogen, UK) in PBS, before 100 μL was transferred across into the assay plate. Erbitux was used as a non-PS binding isotype control antibody [33]. Mouse anti-ZEBOV GP mAb (clone 4F3, IBT Bioservices, US) was used as a positive control for binding to the recombinant glycoprotein. Plates were incubated for 1-2 hours at 37°C to allow antibody binding to occur. Unbound antigen was removed by washing five times with PBS. Secondary antibody consisted of HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) diluted at 1 : 2500 in binding buffer, with 100 μL added per well. Plates were left for 1 hour at 37°C before unbound antibody was removed by washing five times with PBS. 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Insight Biotechnology, UK) was added to each well at a volume of 100 μL and left for 15 minutes at room temperature to allow the colorimetric reaction to occur. The reaction was stopped by addition of 100 μL of 2 M H2SO4 (Fisher Scientific, UK). Absorbances were read by an automated plate spectrometer at a wavelength of 450 nm within 30 minutes of adding the stop solution and analyzed using SoftMax Pro software (Molecular Devices, UK). Data were plotted on a line graph as absorbance at 450 nm versus antibody concentration in a log ng/mL scale.

3. Results

3.1. PGN401 Specifically Binds to Cells Infected with EBOV

VeroE6 cells that had been infected with Ebola Zaire virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 0.5 for five days were used to determine recognition by PGN401 antibody. Staining with an anti-EBOV antibody (clone FE25) showed 9% of cells were specifically labeled (Figure 1(a)). With the PGN401 antibody, 13.5% of cells were specifically stained, compared with 0% for the Erbitux isotype control antibody. This result was repeatable, with a second experiment showing 21.4%, 21.1%, and 0% staining for anti-EBOV, PGN401, and Erbitux, respectively. Dual-colour labeling was used to determine whether the same cells that were stained with the anti-EBOV antibody were also those that PGN401 bound. Results demonstrated that the PGN401 bound to cells to which anti-EBOV antibody was also binding (Figure 1(b)). To support this observation, immunofluorescence testing was conducted using cells infected with EBOV. Results showed specific binding to EBOV-infected cells by the PGN401 and positive control anti-EBOV antibodies with no staining observed with the negative control and isotype antibodies (Figure 2). The immunofluorescence assay was run on two separate occasions and successfully demonstrated that the results were repeatable.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow cytometry staining of EBOV-infected cells. (a) Single color staining of cells with anti-EBOV, Erbitux, and PGN401 antibodies. Histograms show frequency of cells versus level of fluorescence intensity. The marker regions quantify the percentage of cells stained above background levels. (b) Dual color labeling with anti-EBOV and PGN401 antibodies. The x-axis relates to the detection of the FL1 channel that detects Alexa-Fluor 488 staining (anti-mouse detector for EBOV antibody) and the y-axis, the FL4 channel that detects Alexa Fluor 647 staining (anti-human detector for PGN401 and Erbitux). Quadplots identify the percentage of cells within each region.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Immunofluorescence staining of uninfected and EBOV-infected cells after staining with antibodies against EBOV (clone FE25), PS (PGN401), and isotype antibodies. Scale bar indicates 200 nm.

3.2. PGN401 Binds to Purified Ebola Zaire Virions

Concentrated EBOV was used as an antigen to evaluate binding of PGN401 directly to the virus. A quantitative assay on the ultracentrifuged stocks demonstrated an increase in viral titre of approximately 4 logs, from 107.73 in the unconcentrated stock to 1011.6 TCID50/mL. A protein quantification assay demonstrated that the concentrated stock contained 620 μg/mL which was then diluted for use in the ELISA studies. Results showed that PGN401 bound specifically to EBOV virus, with no background binding to PBS buffer alone (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Under conditions of antigen excess, PGN401 recognition of EBOV in ELISA was equivalent to monoclonal antibody recognition of PS (Figure 3(c)). A further ELISA experiment was conducted using recombinant EBOV glycoprotein to ascertain whether the PGN401 recognized this viral protein. Results showed that PGN401 did not bind to the glycoprotein (Figure 4(a)) whereas the positive control antibody did (Figure 4(b)). All ELISA experiments were repeated at least twice in order to confirm the results achieved.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Binding of Erbitux and PGN401 antibodies to plates coated with (a) EBOV, (b) PBS, or (c) PS antigen using a twofold dilution series starting at 1 μg/mL. Binding levels were assessed by measurement of absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm. Data points show mean values from three replicate wells with error bars denoting standard error.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Binding of antibodies to recombinant EBOV glycoprotein. (a) Erbitux and PGN401 antibodies. (b) Polyclonal anti-EBOV glycoprotein antibody and IgG2a isotype control. Data points show mean values from three replicate wells with error bars denoting standard error.

4. Discussion

The data presented in this study clearly demonstrate that PGN401 has strong binding properties for EBOV virions and EBOV-infected cells. The attachment of the antibody to EBOV virions is indicative of PS being present on the EBOV membrane. Previous studies have shown that PS enhances receptor independent virus entry mechanisms [34]. Additionally, PS found on the surface of the vaccinia virus membrane has been shown to trigger the signaling, blebbing, and macropinocytic event, suggesting that the virus uses an entry mechanism based on mimicry of apoptotic bodies [35]. Apoptotic mimicry provides a route for virus uptake and may also help in the evasion of immune recognition; it has also been observed for hepatitis B virus [36], Lassa fever virus [23], and HIV-1 [37]. Entry via macropinocytosis offers the advantage to the virus of not being exposed to the full range of the immune system, thus delaying immune recognition of the infected cells [35]. In addition, macropinocytic entry gives viruses the mechanisms to broaden their host range and tissue specificity [35]. Many enveloped viruses that bud out from the plasma membrane are assembled in, and bud out of, lipid rafts [38]. This includes EBOV [39]. The lipid rafts are enriched with PS [40] and are structurally modified during apoptosis and are involved with the externalization of PS [41]. Other viruses that are believed to egress from rafts include HIV-1 [42], influenza A virus [43], vesicular stomatitis virus [44], Marburg virus [39], and respiratory syncytial virus [45]. Previous studies have also documented that macropinocytosis is used by EBOV for cell entry [46–48]. Therefore, our results further confirm these findings.

The current studies utilized the VeroE6 cell line as a simple, straightforward, and permissive host in vitro. To test for PGN401 binding, we chose the furthest time point from infection before cytopathic effect was observed in order to allow reasonable time for PS to become exposed on the cell surface. Previous studies have shown induction of PS translocation occurs relatively soon after apoptosis [49]. In follow-on studies we aim to detail these findings with the use of primary cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells which are natural targets for EBOV infection [50, 51]; these will also provide the opportunity to specify the postinfection time points when PS becomes exposed on these natural cellular targets. We have assessed the binding of PGN401 independently using two different techniques, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. However, the binding of PGN401 to purified virions has only been conducted by ELISA and we are not able to rule out nonspecific binding to impurities in the virus preparation. Nevertheless, this material was purified through a 20% sucrose cushion and there was no evidence of sample degradation which often accompanies the coconcentration of other proteins. Thus we are confident that PGN401 binds PS of EBOV virions.

The mechanism of action of PGN401 is not fully understood. In the elimination of Pichindé virus infection and viremia in the guinea pig model, PGN401 is thought to function via at least two different mechanisms. Firstly, it caused opsonization and clearance of infectious virus from the bloodstream, leaving less virus to infect other tissues and secondly, it induces ADCC of virus infected cells [23]. Other mechanisms by which an antibody may neutralize pathogenic material can include antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, opsonization, and steric hindrance of ligand activity, almost all of which require the antibody Fc region to interact with cellular receptors [52, 53]. Triggering via the Fc receptor of IgG has also been reported to stimulate chemokine release from natural killer cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells [54–56]. The efficiency of PGN401 may be enhanced by adding extra target molecules to the antibody. For example, adding interleukin (IL)-2 has been shown to enhance immunogenicity of a PS-targeting antibody for use as a breast cancer vaccine [57]. Another option may be to use the antibodies to deliver radionuclides that emanate lethal doses of cytotoxic radiation to target cells [58].

This study has shown that the PS-targeting antibody, PGN401, binds to EBOV-infected cells and to purified EBOV virions. Due to PGN401 having been used for several human clinical trials in cancer, from Phase I to III [13, 20, 21], its repurposing of use for filovirus therapy through licensure or emergency use may present an attractive option. Due to the anticipated small market size of any antifiloviral treatment, the use of therapies primarily designed for other conditions confers several advantages in reducing the costs of bringing an effective treatment to clinical use due to having already negotiated some of the steps required for regulatory approval. Future work to determine whether this approach elucidates any protective effect using in vivo models of EBOV infection is planned.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Transformational Medical Technologies Program Contract HDTRA1-08-C-003 from the Department of Defense Chemical and Biological Defense Program through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding or participant organizations. The authors would like to thank the CL4 staff at the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) for technical assistance in the preparation of concentrated viral stocks for the ELISA assay.

Conflict of Interests

K. Corbin-Lickfett, C. Empig, and K. Schlunegger are employees of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Peregrine is developing PGN401 and related antibodies as therapeutics for cancer and infectious diseases. The remaining authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Adams M. J., Carstens E. B. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the international committee on taxonomy of viruses (2012) Archives of Virology. 2012;157(7):1411–1422. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1299-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuhn J. H., Becker S., Ebihara H., et al. Proposal for a revised taxonomy of the family Filoviridae: classification, names of taxa and viruses, and virus abbreviations. Archives of Virology. 2010;155(12):2083–2103. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0814-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. Ebola haemorrhagic fever in Zaire, 1976: report of an international commission. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1978;56(2):271–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leroy E. M., Gonzalez J.-P., Baize S. Ebola and Marburg haemorrhagic fever viruses: Major scientific advances, but a relatively minor public health threat for Africa. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2011;17(7):964–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wolfe N. D., Prosser A. T., Carr J. K., et al. Exposure to nonhuman primates in rural Cameroon. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(12):2094–2099. doi: 10.3201/eid1012.040062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Borio L., Inglesby T., Peters C. J., et al. Hemorrhagic fever viruses as biological weapons: medical and public health management. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;287(18):2391–2405. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geisbert T. W., Lee A. C., Robbins M., et al. Postexposure protection of non-human primates against a lethal Ebola virus challenge with RNA interference: a proof-of-concept study. The Lancet. 2010;375(9729):1896–1905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60357-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Warren T. K., Warfield K. L., Wells J., et al. Advanced antisense therapies for postexposure protection against lethal filovirus infections. Nature Medicine. 2010;16(9):991–994. doi: 10.1038/nm.2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dye J. M., Herbert A. S., Kuehne A. I., et al. Postexposure antibody prophylaxis protects nonhuman primates from filovirus disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(13):5034–5039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200409109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Olinger G. G., Jr., Pettitt J., Kim D., et al. Delayed treatment of Ebola virus infection with plant-derived monoclonal antibodies provides protection in rhesus macaques. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(44):18030–18035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213709109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qiu X., Audet J., Wong G., et al. Successful treatment of ebola virus-infected cynomolgus macaques with monoclonal antibodies. Science Translational Medicine. 2012;4(138) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003876.138ra81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ran S., He J., Huang X., Soares M., Scothorn D., Thorpe P. E. Antitumor effects of a monoclonal antibody that binds anionic phospholipids on the surface of tumor blood vessels in mice. Clinical Cancer Research. 2005;11(4):1551–1562. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thorpe P. E. Targeting anionic phospholipids on tumor blood vessels and tumor cells. Thrombosis Research. 2010;125(supplement 2):S134–S137. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(10)70031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schutters K., Reutelingsperger C. Phosphatidylserine targeting for diagnosis and treatment of human diseases. Apoptosis. 2010;15(9):1072–1082. doi: 10.1007/s10495-010-0503-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hengartner M. O. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature. 2000;407(6805):770–776. doi: 10.1038/35037710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kobayashi N., Karisola P., Peña-Cruz V., et al. TIM-1 and TIM-4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity. 2007;27(6):927–940. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martin S. J., Finucane D. M., Amarante-Mendes G. P., O'Brien G. A., Green D. R. Phosphatidylserine externalization during CD95-induced apoptosis of cells and cytoplasts requires ICE/CED-3 protease activity. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271(46):28753–28756. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang X., Bennett M., Thorpe P. E. A monoclonal antibody that binds anionic phospholipids on tumor blood vessels enhances the antitumor effect of docetaxel on human breast tumors in mice. Cancer Research. 2005;65(10):4408–4416. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Luster T. A., He J., Huang X., et al. Plasma protein β-2-glycoprotein 1 mediates interaction between the anti-tumor monoclonal antibody 3G4 and anionic phospholipids on endothelial cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(40):29863–29871. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605252200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gerber D. E., Stopeck A. T., Wong L., et al. Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of bavituximab, a chimeric phosphatidylserine-targeting monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17(21):6888–6896. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reichert J. M. Antibodies to watch in 2014: mid-year update. MAbs. 2014;6(4):799–802. doi: 10.4161/mabs.29282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pai J. C., Sutherland J. N., Maynard J. A. Progress towards recombinant anti-infective antibodies. Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery. 2009;4(1):1–17. doi: 10.2174/157489109787236319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Soares M. M., King S. W., Thorpe P. E. Targeting inside-out phosphatidylserine as a therapeutic strategy for viral diseases. Nature Medicine. 2008;14(12):1357–1362. doi: 10.1038/nm.1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mir H. M., Birerdinc A., Younossi Z. M. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against the HCV envelope proteins. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2009;13(3):477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2009.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sakamoto N., Watanabe M. New therapeutic approaches to hepatitis C virus. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;44(7):643–649. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0084-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tomillero A., Moral M. A. Gateways to clinical trials. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2008;30(8):643–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tomillero A., Moral M. A. Gateways to clinical trials. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2008;30(7):543–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jahrling P. B., Hesse R. A., Rhoderick J. B., Elwell M. A., Moe J. B. Pathogenesis of a pichinde virus strain adapted to produce lethal infections in guinea pigs. Infection and Immunity. 1981;32(2):872–880. doi: 10.1128/iai.32.2.872-880.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bowen E. T., Lloyd G., Harris W. J., Platt G. S., Baskerville A., Vella E. E. Viral haemorrhagic fever in southern Sudan and northern Zaire. Preliminary studies on the aetiological agent. The Lancet. 1977;1(8011):571–573. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Johnson K. M., Webb P. A., Lange J. V., Murphy F. A. Isolation and partial characterisation of a new virus causing acute haemorrhagic fever in Zaire. The Lancet. 1977;I(8011):569–571. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92000-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pattyn S., Jacob W., van der Groen G. Isolation of Marburg like virus from a case of haemorrhagic fever in Zaire. The Lancet. 1977;1(8011):573–574. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reed L. J., Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. The American Journal of Epidemiology. 1938;27(3):493–497. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bou-Assaly W., Mukherji S. Cetuximab (erbitux) American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2010;31(4):626–627. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Coil D. A., Miller A. D. Enhancement of enveloped virus entry by phosphatidylserine. Journal of Virology. 2005;79(17):11496–11500. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11496-11500.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mercer J., Helenius A. Apoptotic mimicry: phosphatidylserine-mediated macropinocytosis of vaccinia virus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1209(1):49–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05772.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vanlandschoot P., Leroux-Roels G. Viral apoptotic mimicry: an immune evasion strategy developed by the hepatitis B virus? Trends in Immunology. 2003;24(3):144–147. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Callahan M. K., Popernack P. M., Tsutsui S., Truong L., Schlegel R. A., Henderson A. J. Phosphatidylserine on HIV envelope is a cofactor for infection of monocytic cells. Journal of Immunology. 2003;170(9):4840–4845. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Briggs J. A. G., Wilk T., Fuller S. D. Do lipid rafts mediate virus assembly and pseudotyping? Journal of General Virology. 2003;84, part 4:757–768. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.18779-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bavari S., Bosio C. M., Wiegand E., et al. Lipid raft microdomains: a gateway for compartmentalized trafficking of Ebola and Marburg viruses. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2002;195(5):593–602. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pike L. J., Han X., Chung K.-N., Gross R. W. Lipid rafts are enriched in arachidonic acid and plasmenylethanolamine and their composition is independent of caveolin-1 expression: a quantitative electrospray ionization/mass spectrometric analysis. Biochemistry. 2002;41(6):2075–2088. doi: 10.1021/bi0156557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ishii H., Mori T., Shiratsuchi A., et al. Distinct localization of lipid rafts and externalized phosphatidylserine at the surface of apoptotic cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;327(1):94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ono A., Freed E. O. Plasma membrane rafts play a critical role in HIV-1 assembly and release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(24):13925–13930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241320298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Scheiffele P., Rietveld A., Wilk T., Simons K. Influenza viruses select ordered lipid domains during budding from the plasma membrane. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(4):2038–2044. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pickl W. F., Pimentel-Muiñios F. X., Seed B. Lipid rafts and pseudotyping. Journal of Virology. 2001;75(15):7175–7183. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.7175-7183.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown G., Rixon H. W. M., Sugrue R. J. Respiratory syncytial virus assembly occurs in GM1-rich regions of the host-cell membrane and alters the cellular distribution of tyrosine phosphorylated caveolin-1. Journal of General Virology. 2002;83, part 8:1841–1850. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-8-1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aleksandrowicz P., Marzi A., Biedenkopf N., et al. Ebola virus enters host cells by macropinocytosis and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2011;204(supplement 3):S957–S967. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nanbo A., Imai M., Watanabe S., et al. Ebolavirus is internalized into host cells via macropinocytosis in a viral glycoprotein-dependent manner. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001121.e01121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saeed M. F., Kolokoltsov A. A., Albrecht T., Davey R. A. Cellular entry of ebola virus involves uptake by a macropinocytosis-like mechanism and subsequent trafficking through early and late endosomes. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001110.e01110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mourdjeva M., Kyurkchiev D., Mandinova A., Altankova I., Kehayov I., Kyurkchiev S. Dynamics of membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine during apoptosis detected by a monoclonal antibody. Apoptosis. 2005;10(1):209–217. doi: 10.1007/s10495-005-6076-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Martinez O., Leung L. W., Basler C. F. The role of antigen-presenting cells in filoviral hemorrhagic fever: gaps in current knowledge. Antiviral Research. 2012;93(3):416–428. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Takada A. Filovirus tropism: cellular molecules for viral entry. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2012;3, article 34 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lehner T. Monoclonal antibodies against micro-organisms. Current Opinion in Immunology. 1988;1(3):462–466. doi: 10.1016/0952-7915(88)90027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Presta L. G. Molecular engineering and design of therapeutic antibodies. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2008;20(4):460–470. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fernández N., Renedo M., García-Rodríguez C., Sánchez Crespo M. Activation of monocytic cells through Fcγ receptors induces the expression of macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β and RANTES. The Journal of Immunology. 2002;169(6):3321–3328. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Forthal D. N., Landucci G., Phan T. B., Becerra J. Interactions between natural killer cells and antibody Fc result in enhanced antibody neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Journal of Virology. 2005;79(4):2042–2049. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2042-2049.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Radstake T. R. D. J., van der Voort R., Ten Brummelhuis M., et al. Increased expression of CCL18, CCL19, and CCL17 by dendritic cells from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and regulation by Fc gamma receptors. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(3):359–367. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.017566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huang X., Ye D., Thorpe P. E. Enhancing the potency of a whole-cell breast cancer vaccine in mice with an antibody-IL-2 immunocytokine that targets exposed phosphatidylserine. Vaccine. 2011;29(29-30):4785–4793. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Milenic D. E., Brady E. D., Brechbiel M. W. Antibody-targeted radiation cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2004;3(6):488–499. doi: 10.1038/nrd1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Immunology Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES