Abstract
Hosts' innate defense systems are upregulated by antimicrobial peptide elicitors (APEs). Our aim was to investigate the effects of hyperthermia, ultraviolet A rays (UVA), and ultraviolet C rays (UVC) as well as glucose and ascorbic acid (AA) on the regulation of human β-defensin 1 (DEFB1), cathelicidin (CAMP), and interferon-γ (IFNG) genes in normal human keratinocytes (NHK). The indirect in vitro antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes of these potential APEs was tested. We found that AA is a more potent APE for DEFB1 than glucose in NHK. Glucose but not AA is an APE for CAMP. Mild hypo- (35°C) and hyperthermia (39°C) are not APEs in NHK. AA-dependent DEFB1 upregulation below 20 mM predicts in vitro antimicrobial activity as well as glucose- and AA-dependent CAMP and IFNG upregulation. UVC upregulates CAMP and DEFB1 genes but UVA only upregulates the DEFB1 gene. UVC is a previously unrecognized APE in human cells. Our results suggest that glucose upregulates CAMP in an IFN-γ-independent manner. AA is an elicitor of innate immunity that will challenge the current concept of late activation of adaptive immunity of this vitamin. These results could be useful in designing new potential drugs and devices to combat skin infections.
1. Introduction
Keratinocytes control skin microbial colonization/infection in part by synthesizing human β-defensin 1 (hBD-1) and cathelicidin LL-37, both of which are wide-spectrum antimicrobial peptides [1–4]. Antimicrobial peptide elicitors (APEs) are defined as physical (class I), chemical (class II), and biological (class III) agents that promote upregulation of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (APs) [5–8].
IFNG is a relevant gene in innate and adaptive responses; specifically, its product, IFN-γ, is an APE for both CAMP (codes for LL-37) and DEFB1 (codes for hBD-1) in monocytes and gingival keratinocytes, respectively [6]. In this report we wanted to know if keratinocytes upregulate IFNG in response to APE, independently of the IFNG mRNA provided by lymphocytes in adaptive immunity. Probable APEs with potential application in skin therapy against infections in humans are hyperthermia, ultraviolet A rays (UVA), ultraviolet C rays (UVC), ascorbic acid (AA or vitamin C), and glucose.
In a mice model of influenza infection, hyperthermia, a potential class I APE, is beneficial because it increases leukocyte count and diminishes proinflammatory cytokines, presumably avoiding damage to infected tissue [9]. In humans, hyperthermia is beneficial in treating several diseases such as neurosyphilis, some forms of chronic arthritis, and cancer. Furthermore, many infections cause fever during certain phases, including fever caused by Rickettsia sp., Chlamydia sp., viruses, or parasites. When this fever is associated with endogen pyrogen, it leads to the activation of T cells which enhances the host's defense system [10].
UVA (320–400 nm) are APEs of DEFB1 in scleroderma skin lesions [11] but they have not been tested in normal keratinocytes. UVC (180–280 nm) have been suggested as a prophylactic approach in a mice model of infection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [12] but the function as an APE of this wavelength has not been described. S. aureus is a very common human pathogen susceptible to LL-37 and hBD-1 [6]. In the case of Listeria sp., the pathogen is susceptible to LL-37. These APEs have a therapeutic potential against this pathogen in epithelial cells [13, 14]. In this study, we indirectly assume that microbicidal activity is due the increment of the level of synthesis of these peptides by the APEs as suggested by the mRNA levels and inhibition zones of the antimicrobial assays.
AA has been widely used to prevent and treat the common cold, malaria, and diarrhea infections and pneumonia. AA improves the efficacy of antimicrobial and natural killer cell (NK) activities [15]. Whether this antimicrobial activity is dependent on induction and/or upregulation of APs is unknown. Glucose is an APE of DEFB1 in kidney and colon cells [16] but its effect on both DEFB1 and CAMP in keratinocytes is unknown.
In this study we assessed the capacity of UVA, UVC, AA, glucose, and hyperthermia to act as APEs of DEFB1 and CAMP genes and as inductors of IFNG in a cell line of neonate normal human keratinocytes (NHK).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Culture and Exposure to Potential APEs
Normal human neonate keratinocytes (ATCC PCS-200-010) were maintained in K-SFM cell culture media (Gibco) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. We exposed 1 × 106 cells to D-(+)-glucose (5.5, 15.5, 25.5, and 45.5 mM, Sigma, number of catalog: G8644) or L-ascorbic acid (0, 5, 10, and 20 mM, Sigma, number catalog: A4544) for 24, 48, and 72 h. The incubation temperature was also assessed as potential APE mimicking human mild hypothermia (35°C), normothermia (37°C), and hyperthermia (39°C) in vitro. Additionally, for the ascorbic acid at 20 mM, the interaction between time (24, 48, and 72 h) and temperature (35, 37, and 39°C) was assessed. The exposition to UV rays (UVA at 365 nm, UVC at 254 nm) was performed with a square source of irradiation of 4 Watts (UV lamp UVP-UVGL-25, UVP, Cambridge, UK, number of catalog: 95-0021-12) at 9.2 cm from the adhered cells.
2.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)
Nucleic acids were extracted in a MagNA Pure LC 2.0 Instrument (Roche) with the MagNA Pure LC total nucleic acid kit (Roche, catalog number 03038505001). Purified RNA was DNAse-treated and reverse transcribed with a mix containing random primers (Invitrogen) and ArrayScript enzyme (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with 33 ng cDNA with Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The reactions were run in a Step One Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) using the following primers sequences designed with Primer Express v. 3.0 software (Applied Biosystems) and tested for specificity in PRIMER-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/): for HPRT (endogenous control suggested for normal human keratinocytes according to Allen et al. [17]), F 5′-TGTTCAAATTATTACCAGTGAATCTTTGTC-3′, R 5′ TTTTAAATTTTTGGGAATTTATTGATTTG-3′; for IFNG F 5′-GCTGACTAATTATTCGGTAACTGACTTG-3′, R 5′-TAGCTGCTGGCGACAGTTCA-3′; for DEFB1 F 5′-GAGAACTTCCTACCTTCTGCTGTTTAC-3′, R 5′-AAAGTTACCACCTGAGGCCATCT-3′; for CAMP F 5′-ACCCAGACACGCCAAAGC-3′, R 5′-TTCACCAGCCCGTCCTTCT-3′. The PCR program was 95°C for 20 s, 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 3 s, and annealing/extension at 60°C for 30 s. Melting curves were performed at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 s. Amplification efficiencies for each gene were calculated and the relative quantitative expression was obtained according to the Pfaffl method [18]. The normalization of gene expression included the input RNA and input cell count. The controls were samples with the vehicle at 24 h, or in the case of temperatures the normothermic sample (37°C) for each day.
2.3. Antimicrobial Assays
Diffusion assays were performed according to Kirby et al. [19]. We tested culture supernatants samples with a volume of 50 μL poured into 6 mm diameter wells. The negative control was the supernatant of the culture medium without the potential APE and the positive control was 2.25 μM (1 mg/mL) of tetracycline. Three biological replicas of each were performed with strains of Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19114, susceptible to LL-37 [13, 14]) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923, susceptible to LL-37 and hBD-1) [6].
2.4. Cytotoxicity Assays
In the experimental conditions where gene upregulation was observed, experiments were repeated and cytotoxicity assays were performed in increasing concentrations of the APEs. This was assessed by applying 0.05% trypsin by 12 min and neutralizing with DMEM (10% fetal bovine serum). After centrifugation (400 ×g, 5 min), three 10 μL aliquots of homogeneous precipitated cells were quantified in a Neubauer chamber. The percentage of viable cells adhered to the plate was compared with the control without elicitor, considered as being 100% viable. Quantifications of each day were compared with the control of the corresponding days (Cruz Díaz et al., in process).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical comparisons were done in Microsoft Excel 2010. To evaluate if variances were different or equal among treatments, we performed F tests. Depending of the results of F tests, Student's t-tests for equal or nonequal variances were performed. Results are shown as mean + standard error of the mean (SEM). All experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
When we exposed the dermal cells to increasing levels of glucose, simulating increased absorption and distribution of glucose after feeding, the viability of keratinocytes increased at 24 h and was found to be highly significant at 48 h and 72 h (Figure 1(a)). At 24 h of glucose exposure (45.5 mM), DEFB1 expression was significantly upregulated (Figure 1(b)).
The viability of keratinocytes is not affected at 10 mM of ascorbic acid (AA, Figure 2(a)) but begins to be affected at 20 mM and was highly significantly affected at 40 mM (Figure 2(b)). When keratinocytes were exposed to 10 and 20 mM of ascorbic acid, DEFB1 was upregulated by almost 5 logs after 72 h (Figure 2(c)).
At 72 h rather than at 24 h, glucose also upregulated IFNG and CAMP genes (Figure 3). AA also upregulated IFNG (Figure 3), but AA did not affect CAMP expression at any time or concentration (data not shown). DEFB1 (3 logs), CAMP (1 log), and IFNG (1 log) were upregulated in both hypothermia and hyperthermia conditions mainly at 72 h, although the results were not significant (data not shown). We then assessed the effect of temperature at 20 mM of AA by 72 h (highest significant upregulation of DEFB1, Figure 2(c)). Compared with normothermia, DEFB1 was upregulated at 24 h at 35°C but downregulated at 72 h at both 35 and 39°C (Figure 2(d)). Interestingly, at hypothermia and 20 mM of AA both IFNG and CAMP were downregulated at 72 h (Figure 3). Furthermore, the expressions of DEFB1 and IFNG correlate linearly with 20 mM at 35°C (r 2 = 0.9).
UVC upregulated CAMP at 5 and 10 min of exposure (Figure 4(a)) as well as upregulating DEFB1 (Figure 4(b)) and IFNG genes (Figure 4(c)). Surprisingly, UVA slightly upregulated DEFB1 at 5 min of exposure and downregulated it at 10 and 20 min of exposure (Figure 4(d)). UVA do not impact CAMP or IFNG regulation (data not shown).
The supernatant of NHK in the condition 5 mM AA, 24 h, 37°C, that shows upregulation of both CAMP (2.56-fold) and IFNG (3.31-fold) showed an increased antimicrobial activity against both L. monocytogenes and S. aureus (Figure 5) in spite the diminished expression of DEFB1 (0.5-fold). As expected due to diminished viability, both conditions 37°C, 20 mM AA, 72 h, and 35°C, 20 mM AA, 24 h, diminish the activity against S. aureus significantly even at the former condition which had the highest DEFB1 expression (4 logs).
Both samples from 45.5 mM glucose, 24 h and 72 h, showed increased antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes respectively, as expected, presumably because in these samples DEFB1 (90-fold) and CAMP (6.43-fold) genes were upregulated, respectively.
4. Discussion
We demonstrate for the first time that AA is an APE for DEFB1 but not for CAMP. We therefore propose that the indirect antimicrobial effect of ascorbic acid in NHK could be at least partially dependent on DEFB1 induction which challenges the traditional view regarding AA only as being considered a player in the later activation of the adaptive immunity [20]. This also could explain why AA acts as an antitumor agent [21–23], since DEFB1 is considered a tumor suppressor gene [24, 25].
Regarding cytotoxicity assay, Trypan Blue Exclusion (TBE) Assay overestimates viable cells [26] and assignment of trypan-stained cells to viable or nonviable categories was found to be subjective and arbitrary [27]. Regarding 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, a lineal relationship exists between reduced tetrazolium dye and cell number only up to 2 × 104 cells/well with no relationship at higher cell numbers and/or absorbance values of greater than 0.8 [27]. Also MTT was designed to test cytotoxic drugs and the recommended set of concentrations must include the highest concentration that kills most of the cells and the lowest concentration that kills none of the cells [28]. The main advantages of the proposed protocol is that in adherent cultures it permits to obtain a number of viable cells that are already attached, because the nonattached cells, if any, are removed by aspirating the supernatant. With our method, there is less ambiguity assigning viability as in TBE and chemical reactions even in the absence of viable cells. This does not affect the results as in MTT (Cruz Díaz et al., in process).
It has been reported that short-term hypothermia (taken as 30–34°C, 2–4 hours,) in cell lines and murine models increases the level of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) and decreases proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α), inhibiting lymphocyte proliferation and decreasing HLA-DR expression associated with cell activation. Long term (>24 hours) hypothermia, however, increases proinflammatory cytokine levels [29]. The hyperthermic conditioning (41°C) has been an effective treatment in mice with sepsis in combination with LL-37. In rats with hypothermia (32°C) prior to sepsis, the IL-10 levels were significantly increased compared to normothermic rats, altering the cytokines profile, survival, and recruitment of granulocytes suggesting immunosuppression [30]. Human hypothermia (32°C) is associated with elevated frequency of infectious complications; dysfunction of the immune response caused by hypothermia has been demonstrated in both clinical and animal studies [31]. Contrary to our hypothesis, hyperthermia does not upregulate the expression of DEFB1 or CAMP in a significant manner; nevertheless the strong tendency to upregulate mainly DEFB1 (data not shown) deserves further investigation.
On the contrary, we observed that hypothermia improved the potential of AA (20 mM) both acting as APE at 24 h. However, in this combination, both extreme conditions (hypo- and hyperthermia) diminished DEFB1 expression at 72 h. This could be because in these two scenarios the keratinocytes are exposed to a prolonged oxidative stress probably requiring more AA to counteract the adverse environment. Notably, the upregulation of DEFB1 with AA does not predict antimicrobial activity in vitro probably because in an amount of equal to or higher than 20 mM we found that AA is cytotoxic. Also, high oral doses of AA in vivo cause hyperoxaluria, which is the excessive urinary excretion of oxalate and often the formation of kidney stones [10]. Clinical trials must uncover the optimal doses of AA in fever episodes of diverse infections to reach the expected efficacy of AA as APE of DEFB1. The role of AA as APE was anticipated because AA reduces the expression of IL-10 in a dose-dependent way [32] and this cytokine inhibits the expression of hBD-1 [33].
According to our results, IFNG mRNA levels probably provided the keratinocyte with an innate immunity against skin pathogens, independent of the late lymphocyte-derived IFN-γ (adaptive immunity) in an established infection [34]. Also we found that IFN-γ is upregulated earlier than DEFB1 suggesting that the former could act as an APE in NHK of foreskin as is true in gingival keratinocytes [35, 36], macrophages [37], and monocytes [38]. The condition where IFNG and CAMP were upregulated was the only one that predicts increment antimicrobial activity in the two tested Gram-positive pathogens, suggesting that this IFNG-dependent response is a stronger APE than IFNG-independent response (e.g., TNF-α-mediated) [6]. The antimicrobial in vitro prediction of CAMP upregulation is in concordance with a recent demonstration that transfecting CAMP mRNA increases resistance to Listeria sp. in oral epithelial cells [14].
In diabetic and obese rat models, the expression of β-defensin 1 (BD-1) was lower than that of slim rat controls [39] and only β-defensin 2 was found to be increased in diabetic rats, most likely as a result of a proinflammatory response [40]. Glucose has been described as an APE of DEFB1 in human embryonic kidney HEK-293 [16, 41] and colon adenocarcinoma cells HCT-116 [16] but not for keratinocytes. Our results suggest an impact of intracellular glucose deficiency in susceptibility to skin infections due to DEFB1 downregulation, for example, ulcers in diabetic patients. We also demonstrate that glucose induces a faster and higher expression of DEFB1 compared to CAMP in normal keratinocytes. The glucose-dependent expression of DEFB1 and CAMP has a biological relevance because they show constitutive skin expression, probably explained by the constant supply of glucose through blood in a nonstarved state and/or normal internalization of glucose in a nondiabetic host. Interestingly, Barnea et al. did not find dose-dependent response above 10 mM of glucose in HEK-293 cells [16] as we found in NHK, revealing a possible higher tissue-specific response. Furthermore, some authors consider that CAMP is an inducible gene. However in our system of NHK from neonate foreskin it always showed a constitutive expression as previously suggested in squamous epithelia of mouth, tongue, esophagus, vagina, and cervix [42].
UVA makes up 95% of UV light that reaches the earth's surface [43]. UVA inhibits cell proliferation due to the arrest of the S-phase [44] and also acts as an inhibitor of DEFB1 in scleroderma lesional skin, with no effect in unaffected skin in these patients [11]. On the contrary, we found that in NHK UVA is a modest APE of DEFB1 but an antimicrobial peptide inhibitor (API) at longer exposures. These suggest that in scleroderma lesions the potential of this APE could be affected by an alteration of DEFB1 overexpression pathways [7, 45] probably due to a unbalanced cytokine expression profile [6]. The lack of upregulation of IFNG in the exposure to UVA suggests that the route of DEFB1 expression with this APE is IFN-γ-independent, but this deserves further investigation.
Our results reinforce and expand the notion that UV light (beyond UVA and UVB) stimulates APs gene expression. Furthermore, we were able to induce upregulation of DEFB1 and CAMP genes at 4.25% of energy and 0.347% of exposure time required to upregulate DEFB4, DEFB103, and S100A7 genes [46]. In spite of the fact that in nature most of UVC is usually blocked by the stratospheric ozone layer [43], compact fluorescent light bulbs expose our skin to UVC as well as UVA [44]. UVC causes degradation of IκBα and nuclear entry of p65/RelA thus activating the NF-κB pathway (independent of IκB kinase-IKK-activation) [47]. This nuclear factor is a probable regulator of DEFB1 expression as suggested by our group [48]. We demonstrate for the first time that UVC in short exposures can be useful as APE of CAMP and DEFB1, even though it is well known that longer exposure to UVC causes DNA damage [44].
5. Conclusion
Mild hypo- (35°C) and hyperthermia (39°C) are not APEs in NHK in vitro, even when hyperthermia shows a tendency to act as an APE with probable biological significance, in spite of its not being statistically significant. Moderate exposure to UVC upregulates CAMP and DEFB1 genes, but UVA only upregulates the DEFB1 gene in HNK at 5 min of exposure. UVA is an API of DEFB1 at longer exposures. The later apparently downregulation could be explained because mRNA of DEFB1 start degrading after 5 min of exposure to UVA. But this requires further investigation. These results suggest alternative expression pathways or different induction thresholds for DEFB1 and CAMP. UVC is a previously unrecognized APE in human cells. These findings uncover the potential of novel therapeutics in skin infectious diseases.
Our results also suggest that glucose upregulates CAMP in an IFN-γ-independent manner and thus probably in an inflammation-independent manner. AA is a more potent APE for DEFB1 than glucose in NHK. Glucose but not AA is an APE for CAMP. AA-dependent DEFB1 upregulation below 20 mM predicts in vitro antimicrobial activity as well as glucose- and AA-dependent CAMP and IFNG upregulation. Levels of serum glucose in diabetic patients could be useful to predict susceptibility to infections due to diminished APs expression, but this requires further clinical studies. AA as APE will challenge the current concept of late activation of adaptive immunity of this vitamin probably acting at the keratinocyte level independent of adaptive immunity. This knowledge could be useful to develop new potential drugs and devices to combat skin infections based on these APEs. Future research in classes I and II APEs holds great promise.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Fondos Sectoriales de Ciencia Básica SEP grant CB-2008-01-105813 from the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT, Mexico). Ernesto Prado Montes de Oca and Marisela Gonzalez Ávila are Fellows of the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI, CONACYT). Thanks are due to Dr. Jim Rheinwald (Harvard Medical School) for provision of his lab's protocols to cultivate keratinocytes.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they are pursuing patents for the methods and uses and, when applicable, the elicitors, inhibitors, and derivatives or their combination generated in the name of CIATEJ AC, with E. Prado Montes de Oca et al., as inventors. The primers sequences also will be protected and should be used only for academic purposes.
References
- 1.Schröder J.-M. The role of keratinocytes in defense against infection. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2010;23(2):106–110. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328335b004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Braff M. H., Zaiou M., Fierer J., Nizet V., Gallo R. L. Keratinocyte production of cathelicidin provides direct activity against bacterial skin pathogens. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73(10):6771–6781. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6771-6781.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Braff M. H., Di Nardo A., Gallo R. L. Keratinocytes store the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin in lamellar bodies. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2005;124(2):394–400. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schröder J. M., Harder J. Antimicrobial skin peptides and proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2006;63(4):469–486. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5364-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prado Montes de Oca E. The potential of antimicrobial peptide inhibitors (APIs) and elicitors (APEs) in leprosy treatment. In: Koop R. S., editor. Leprosy: Epidemiology, Treatment Strategies and Current Challenges in Research. Hauppage, NY, USA: Nova Publishers; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Prado Montes de Oca E. Antimicrobial peptide elicitors: new hope for the post-antibiotic era. Innate Immunity. 2013;19(3):227–241. doi: 10.1177/1753425912460708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prado Montes de Oca E. Human β-defensin 1: a restless warrior against allergies, infections and cancer. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2010;42(6):800–804. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prado-Montes de Oca E. Antimicrobial peptide elicitors: a potential strategy against infections. Gaceta Medica de Mexico. 2009;145:241–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jhaveri K. A., Trammell R. A., Toth L. A. Effect of environmental temperature on sleep, locomotor activity, core body temperature and immune responses of C57BL/6J mice. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2007;21(7):975–987. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petersdorf R. G., Adams R. D., Braunwald E., Isselbacher K. J., Martin J. B., Wilson J. D., editors. Principles of Internal Medicine. New York, NY, USA: Mc Graw Hill; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kreuter A., Hyun J., Skrygan M., et al. Ultraviolet A1-induced downregulation of human β-defensins and interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 correlates with clinical improvement in localized scleroderma. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2006;155(3):600–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dai T., Garcia B., Murray C. K., Vrahas M. S., Hamblin M. R. UVC light prophylaxis for cutaneous wound infections in mice. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2012;56(7):3841–3848. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00161-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Turner J., Cho Y., Dinh N.-N., Waring A. J., Lehrer R. I. Activities of LL-37, a cathelin-associated antimicrobial peptide of human neutrophils. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1998;42(9):2206–2214. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zou X., Sorenson B. S., Ross K. F., Herzberg M. C. Augmentation of epithelial resistance to invading bacteria by using mRNA transfections. Infection and Immunity. 2013;81(11):3975–3983. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00539-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wintergerst E. S., Maggini S., Hornig D. H. Immune-enhancing role of Vitamin C and zinc and effect on clinical conditions. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2006;50(2):85–94. doi: 10.1159/000090495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barnea M., Madar Z., Froy O. Glucose and insulin are needed for optimal defensin expression in human cell lines. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;367(2):452–456. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allen D., Winters E., Kenna P. F., Humphries P., Farrar G. J. Reference gene selection for real-time rtPCR in human epidermal keratinocytes. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2008;49(3):217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pfaffl M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001;29(9, article e45) doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kirby W. M., Perry D. M., Bauer A. W. Treatment of staphylococcal septicemia with vancomycin: report of thirty-three cases. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1960;262:49–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196001142620201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shaik-Dasthagirisaheb Y. B., Varvara G., Murmura G., et al. Role of vitamins D, e and C in immunity and inflammation. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2013;27(2):291–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawada H., Kaneko M., Sawanobori M., et al. High concentrations of L-ascorbic acid specifically inhibit the growth of human leukemic cells via downregulation of HIF-1alpha transcription. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062717.e62717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim J., Lee S.-D., Chang B., et al. Enhanced antitumor activity of vitamin C via p53 in cancer cells. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2012;53(8):1607–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.07.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Asada R., Kageyama K., Tanaka H., Kimura M., Saitoh Y., Miwa N. Carcinostatic effects of diverse ascorbate derivatives in comparison with aliphatic chain moiety structures: promotion by combined hyperthermia and reduced cytotoxicity to normal cells. Oncology Letters. 2012;3(5):1042–1046. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Donald C. D., Sun C. Q., Lim S. D., et al. Cancer-specific loss of β-defensin 1 in renal and prostatic carcinomas. Laboratory Investigation. 2003;83(4):501–505. doi: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000063929.61760.F6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun C. Q., Arnold R., Fernandez-Golarz C., et al. Human β-defensin-1, a potential chromosome 8p tumor suppressor: control of transcription and induction of apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Research. 2006;66(17):8542–8549. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Altman S. A., Renders L., Rao G. Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations. Biotechnology Progress. 1993;9(6):671–674. doi: 10.1021/bp00024a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Plumb J. A., Milroy R., Kaye S. B. Effects of the pH dependence of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide-formazan absorption on chemosensitivity determined by a novel tetrazolium-based assay. Cancer Research. 1989;49(16):4435–4440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Freshney R. I. Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique. 5th. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pongor V., Toldi G., Szabó M., Vásárhelyi B. Systemic and immunomodulatory effects of whole body therapeutic hypothermia. Orvosi Hetilap. 2011;152(15):575–580. doi: 10.1556/OH.2011.29086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Torossian A., Gurschi E., Bals R., Vassiliou T., Wulf H. F., Bauhofer A. Effects of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and hyperthermic preconditioning in septic rats. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(3):437–441. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278906.86815.eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Russwurm S., Stonans I., Schwerter K., Stonane E., Meissner W., Reinhart K. Direct influence of mild hypothermia on cytokine expression and release in cultures of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research. 2002;22(2):215–221. doi: 10.1089/107999002753536185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bergman M., Salman H., Djaldetti M., Fish L., Punsky I., Bessler H. In vitro immune response of human peripheral blood cells to vitamins C and E. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2004;15(1):45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gambichler T., Skrygan M., Tomi N. S., et al. Differential mRNA expression of antimicrobial peptides and proteins in atopic dermatitis as compared to psoriasis vulgaris and healthy skin. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2008;147(1):17–24. doi: 10.1159/000128582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schroder K., Hertzog P. J., Ravasi T., Hume D. A. Interferon-γ: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;75(2):163–189. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Joly S., Organ C. C., Johnson G. K., McCray P. B., Jr., Guthmiller J. M. Correlation between β-defensin expression and induction profiles in gingival keratinocytes. Molecular Immunology. 2005;42(9):1073–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kalus A. A., Fredericks L. P., Hacker B. M., et al. Association of a genetic polymorphism (-44 C/G SNP) in the human DEFB1 gene with expression and inducibility of multiple -defensins in gingival keratinocytes. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9, article 21 doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fabri M., Stenger S., Shin D.-M., et al. Vitamin D is required for IFN-gamma-mediated antimicrobial activity of human macrophages. Science Translational Medicine. 2011;3(104) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003045.104ra102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Klug-Micu G. M., Stenger S., Sommer A., eatl CD40 ligand and interferon-γ induce an antimicrobial response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human monocytes. Immunology. 2013;139(1):121–128. doi: 10.1111/imm.12062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hiratsuka T., Nakazato M., Date Y., Mukae H., Matsukura S. Nucleotide sequence and expression of rat β-defensin-1: its significance in diabetic rodent models. Nephron. 2001;88(1):65–70. doi: 10.1159/000045961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Froy O., Hananel A., Chapnik N., Madar Z. Differential effect of insulin treatment on decreased levels of beta-defensins and Toll-like receptors in diabetic rats. Molecular Immunology. 2007;44(5):796–802. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Malik A. N., Al-Kafaji G. Glucose regulation of β-defensin-1 mRNA in human renal cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2007;353(2):318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nilsson M. F., Sandstedt B., Sørensen O., Weber G., Borregaard N., Ståhle-Bäckdahl M. The human cationic antimicrobial protein (hCAP18), a peptide antibiotic, is widely expressed in human squamous epithelia and colocalizes with interleukin-6. Infection and Immunity. 1999;67(5):2561–2566. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.5.2561-2566.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Muthusamy V., Piva T. J. The UV response of the skin: a review of the MAPK, NFκB and TNFα signal transduction pathways. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2010;302(1):5–17. doi: 10.1007/s00403-009-0994-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mironava T., Hadjiargyrou M., Simon M., Rafailovich M. H. The effects of UV emission from compact fluorescent light exposure on human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes in vitro. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2012;88(6):1497–1506. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Prado Montes de Oca E. Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology 15. 2011. DEFB1 (defensin, beta 1) [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gläser R., Navid F., Schuller W., et al. UV-B radiation induces the expression of antimicrobial peptides in human keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2009;123(5):1117–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li N., Karin M. Ionizing radiation and short wavelength UV activate NF-κB through two distinct mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(22):13012–13017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Prado-Montes de Oca E., Velarde-Felix J. S., Rios-Tostado J. J., Picos-Cardenas V. J., Figuera L. E. SNP 668C (-44) alters a NF-kappaB1 putative binding site in non-coding strand of human beta-defensin 1 (DEFB1) and is associated with lepromatous leprosy, Infection, genetics and evolution. Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Genetics in Infectious Diseases. 2009;9:617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]