Effect of eosinophil cationic protein on human oral squamous carcinoma cell viability

Abstract

The exact function of eosinophils in cancer, particularly in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), has not yet been elucidated and the possible antitumor effect of these leukocytes is associated with the release of cytotoxic proteins, particularly eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ECP on human OSCC lines and to provide novel insights into the role of eosinophils in these tumors. The viability of the SCC-4 and SCC-25 OSCC cell lines was assessed by colorimetric assay using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). The cells were plated into 96-well plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's nutrient mixture F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, the indicated concentration of ECP (0–10 µ M) was added to each sample. The plate was read using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 570 nm. The association between variables was estimated by linear regression analysis. There was a significant inverse association between ECP concentrations with SCC-4 (β=0.16, P=0.019) and SCC-25 cell viability (β=0.24, P=0.006). To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to investigate the effects of ECP on OSCCs and to demonstrate a significant inverse association between ECP concentrations with SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell viability.

Introduction

Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), found in the secondary granules of human eosinophils, is a single-chain peptide of 133 amino acids, with a molecular mass ranging between 15 and 22 kDa, encoded by the RNSE3 gene located on chromosome 14q11.2. Its amino acid sequence and three-dimensional structure indicate that ECP is a member of the ribonuclease a superfamily (1–7). Protein heterogeneity is a result of post-translational modifications, such as differences in glycosylation of the molecule, since there are three potential sites for N-linked glycosylation in the ECP amino acid sequence (6, 8–12).

ECP has a number of biological activities, including suppression of T-cell proliferative responses and immunoglobulin synthesis by B cells, mast cell degranulation, regulation of fibroblast activities, induction of airway mucus secretion and interaction with the coagulation and complement systems (5, 10, 13). Furthermore, the most striking function of ECP is its cytotoxic activity against bacteria, parasites, viruses, respiratory epithelial and cancer cells (2, 4, 8, 9, 12, 13). The mechanism of action of ECP is mediated through its cytotoxic capacity to create pores in the cell membrane, with ensuing destabilization of the phospholipid bilayer and osmotic cell lysis (2, 9, 11, 14, 15).

According to Navarro et al (4), the effect of ECP begins with its binding and aggregation on the cell surface, which alters the cell membrane permeability and modifies the cell ionic equilibrium. These signals induce cell-specific morphological and biochemical changes, such as chromatin condensation, reversion of membrane asymmetry, production of reactive oxygen species, activation of caspase-3-like activity and, eventually, cell death. In addition, the high number of arginine residues on the surface of the protein (16) and the tryptophan residues at positions 10 and 35 (2, 16) appear to be crucial for the cytotoxic activity of ECP.

The exact function of eosinophils in cancer, particularly in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), has not yet been fully elucidated (17–21). Certain authors support the hypothesis that eosinophils play a significant role in the host defense against cancer, whereas others suggest that the antitumor effect of eosinophils in human is modest at best, particularly in view of the numerous examples of aggressive cancers that continue to proliferate and spread, although they are infiltrated by significant numbers of eosinophils (20).

The antitumor effect of eosinophils (5, 6, 19, 21, 22) has been associated with the release of cytotoxic proteins, including ECP. Furthermore, the blood eosinophil counts and serum concentration of ECP were found to be significantly higher when compared between prior to and during treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon (IFN)- α in patients with renal cell adenocarcinoma (22). Based on those results, the authors hypothesized that, although the precise mechanisms involved in the induction of the release of the eosinophil-derived products are not known, potential candidates are tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- α and the direct interaction of the eosinophils with cancer cells through antibody-dependent mechanisms.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of ECP on human OSCC lines and provide novel insights into the role of eosinophils in these tumors.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell lines (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's nutrient mixture F12 (DMEM/F12; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 400 ng/ml hydrocortisone and 100 µ g/ml gentamycin and kanamycin at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂, as described by Agostini et al (23).

Evaluation of cellular morphology

The effects of the ECP on cell morphology were observed using an inverted light microscope (Eclipse E200; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and were photographed prior to and after treatment, to document possible changes in morphology.

Cell viability assay

The effect of ECP on SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell viability was assessed by colorimetric assay using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), as described by Gomes et al (24).

Briefly, SCC-4 and SCC-25 cells were cultured in 96-well plates for 24 h in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 2×10⁵ cells per well. The ECP (MyBioSource, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA) was diluted in complete medium to prepare samples of different concentrations. Negative control wells received 100 µl of complete medium, whereas the treated cells were incubated for 72 h with 0.0390625, 0.078125, 0.15625, 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 µ M of ECP (final volume, 100 µl/well). At the end of the incubation, the medium was removed and each well received 50 µl of MTT solution (0.5 mg/ml in PBS buffer; Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA), including 6 wells without cells (blanks). The plates were incubated at 37˚C for 4 h followed by the addition of 200 µl of dimethylsulfoxide to each well and incubation with shaking at 37˚C for 20 min to ensure complete dissolution of the formazan crystals. The resulting absorbances were read at 570 nm in a microplate reader (PowerWave XS2; Biotek Instruments, Inc. Winooski, VT, USA) and cell viability was calculated using the following equation:

where A is the absorbance of the treated cells, B is the absorbance of the blank and C is the absorbance of the control. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The viability mean was used in the statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and stored in Microsoft Excel for Windows for later analysis with Stata software, version 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). The association between ECP concentration (independent variable) and cell viability (dependent variable) was estimated by linear regression analysis. Two analyses were performed, for SCC-4 and SCC-25 cells. As cell viability is not normally distributed, prior to statistical analysis, the values were logarithmically transformed to approximate a normal distribution. The ECP concentration was entered in the analysis as a continuous variable. P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Morphological changes

Direct observation under a light microscope was used to assess the morphological changes of SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell cultures following exposure to ECP. The cells treated with ECP were photographed at 72 h following treatment and morphological changes, such as vacuolation, bleb formation and loss of cell adhesion were identified (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Morphological characteristics of the cell lines observed under an inverted light microscope. SCC-4 cells (A) prior to treatment with ECP and (B) after 72 h of exposure to ECP. SCC-25 cells (C) prior to treatment with ECP and (D) after 72 h of exposure to ECP.

Cell viability

There was a significant inverse association between ECP concentrations with SCC-4 (β=0.16, P=0.019) and SCC-25 (β=0.24, P=0.006) cell viability (Table I). The regression analysis demonstrated that the ECP concentration explained ∼ 52% of the variations in SCC-4 viability and ∼ 64% of those in SCC-25 viability.

Table I.

Regression coefficients (95% CI) for the association of ECP concentration with SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell viability.

Cell lines	β(95% CI)a	P-value	R2
SCC-4	0.16 (0.03-0.27)	0.019	51.9
SCC-25	0.24 (0.09-0.38)	0.006	63.9

^aRegression coefficients represent log transformed cell viability values. ECP concentration varie d between 0 (control) and 10 µ M. CI, confidence interval; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein.

Discussion

The mechanisms that cause eosinophil recruitment to malignant neoplasms have not been fully elucidated (18, 20, 25). A complex mixture of the components of innate and adaptive immune responses are likely to be involved in this process (21, 26). currently available evidence suggests that CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and natural killer cells are capable of producing the Th2-mediated cytokines IL-4 and IL-5, thus providing strong eosinophil-specific chemoattractants and activation signals within the tumor environment (21, 26).

Additionally, the eosinophils are considered to be recruited to tumors, in part, by the selective eosinophil chemoattractant eotaxin, which binds to the CCR3 receptor on these cells (21, 25–27). The expression of eotaxin in OSCC was investigated by Lorena et al (25), whose results demonstrated that eotaxin is mainly produced by tumor-associated eosinophils, which appears to increase the cell turnover rate in oral cancer.

It was previously suggested that eosinophils may affect tumors via direct and/or indirect mechanisms and it appears that the tumor microenvironment may provide additional signs for eosinophil degranulation and tumor destruction (19, 21). The antitumor effect of eosinophils (5, 6, 21, 22) has been associated with the release of cytotoxic proteins, including ECP, which has been linked to tumor cell apoptosis.

Furthermore, blood eosinophil counts and the serum concentration of ECP were found to be significantly higher prior to and during treatment with IL-2 and IFN- α in patients with renal cell adenocarcinoma (22). Based on those results, the authors hypothesized that, although the precise mechanisms involved in the induction of the release of eosinophil-derived products are not known, potential candidates are TNF- α and the direct interaction of the eosinophils with cancer cells through antibody-dependent mechanisms.

Our results demonstrated that OSCC lines treated with ECP displayed morphological changes, such as vacuolation, bleb formation and loss of adhesion (Fig. 1). As we were investigating cell death, a longer period of 72 h was selected. Similar findings were described by Trocmé et al (28), who exposed primary human corneal epithelial cell cultures to ECP at concentrations ranging between 0 and 10 µg/µl for up to 48 h. According to that study, the morphological changes in the cells observed following ECP exposure may be partially explained by its effects on the epithelial actin cytoskeleton. Indeed, the actin filaments have been implicated in the control of cell shape and cell adhesion to the substratum.

In our study, the regression analysis demonstrated that an increase in the ECP concentration was associated with a significant decrease in SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell viability (Table I). Maeda et al (29) evaluated the effect of ECP on 13 mammalian cell lines and reported that this protein inhibited the growth of several cell lines, including those derived from skin and esophageal squamous carcinoma, in a dose-dependent manner.

Glimelius et al (30) investigated the effects of ECP on Hodgkin's lymphoma cells in vitro. Of note, ECP was cytotoxic even at low concentrations; however, ECP was unable to eliminate all tumor cells, particularly not HDLM-2 cells (of T-cell origin), even at high concentrations and a prolonged exposure time (72 h). Based on those results, the authors suggested that one possible mechanism of such selectivity may be the different sensitivities according to the cell cycle stage of the cell population. HDLM-2 cells in the G0 phase may be insensitive to ECP and only cells in active growth phases are eliminated by ECP.

The mechanism of action of ECP is likely due to its cytotoxic capacity to create pores in the cell membrane, which allows the passage of water and other small molecules, leading to osmotic lysis of the target cell (15). The effects of ECP begin with its binding and aggregation on the cell surface, altering the cell membrane permeability and modifying the cell ionic equilibrium. These signals induce cell-specific morphological and biochemical changes, such as chromatin condensation, reversion of membrane asymmetry, reactive oxygen species production, activation of caspase-3-like activity and, eventually, cell death (4).

A cell line is not necessarily a good example of primary tumor material, as the cells are removed from the normal tissue environment, which may affect their response to ECP; however, it is important to emphasize that the present study was the first to investigate the effects of ECP on OSCC and to demonstrate a significant inverse association of ECP concentrations with SCC-4 and SCC-25 cell viability.