Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Mar 17;5:9186. doi: 10.1038/srep09186

Enantiospecific photoresponse of sterically hindered diarylethenes for chiroptical switches and photomemories

Wenlong Li 1, Xin Li 2, Yongshu Xie 1, Yue Wu 1, Mengqi Li 1, Xin-Yan Wu 1, Wei-Hong Zhu 1,a, He Tian 1
PMCID: PMC4361853  PMID: 25777985

Abstract

Light-driven transcription, replication and enzyme catalysis are critically dependent upon a delicate transfer between molecular and supramolecular chirality. Chemists have well realized the impressive stereospecificity over many thermally accessible cycloaddition with chiral catalysts, but making light work in the enantiomer control of diarylethene photocyclization has proved to be more challenging. Here, we report a unique sterically hindered diarylethene (BBTE) system with absolute enantiospecific photocyclization and cycloreversion. Moreover, we have fully separated all the five thermally stable isomers, consisting of one achiral parallel conformer, one pair of anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers, and another pair of ring-closed enantiomers, whose absolute chiral configurations are entirely elucidated by single X-ray crystallographic analyses. The photo-responsive feature exhibits a reversible, complete enantio-control transformation without racemism, offering an unrivaled unimolecular enantiospecific platform for potential applications as bistable chiroptical switches and all-photonic photomemories with optical rotation as non-destructive readout.

Chiral molecules and helical structures exist universally in nature, and are of vital importance to living systems1,2. Owing to the clean and precise spatiotemporal control in a remote and noninvasive manner, the light-driven chirality transformation, especially based on photochromic systems3,4, enables a myriad of potential applications in smart materials5,6,7,8,9 and functional bio-switches10,11,12 at molecular level. Amongst the most ideal candidates, diarylethenes (DAEs)13,14,15,16,17,18,19 undergo reversible conrotatory 6π-electron photocyclization and cycloreversion, along with excellent thermal irreversibility and outstanding fatigue resistance. A closer examination at the photo-switching process of DAEs reveals not only a structural change from the ring-open to the ring-closed states, but also a chirality transformation from the axial helixity of central hexatriene moiety to the central asymmetry of two reactive stereogenic centers. Since the flexible ring-open isomers show typically rapid rotation of aryl groups, the accompanied loss in inherent chirality takes place inevitably. Therefore, no racemization in the photochromic reaction between two enantiomers is highly desirable for light-driven chiroptical switches.

To deal with the dilemma, a few molecular-engineering efforts have been explored by generating intermolecular or intramolecular asymmetric environment, for instance, introducing auxiliary chiral units20,21,22, conducting photoreactions in the chiral crystals23,24,25 and supramolecular states26,27,28, and fixing aryl rotation through covalent bonding29,30 or steric hinderance31. However, these systems are always restricted with reaction conditions, such as low temperature, specific solvent dependence and limited conversion yield. Indeed, the full enantiospecific thermal bistability is still rare in DAE, and the completely isolating enantiomerically pure single crystals for absolute chiral configuration are highly desirable. Herein, we report the unique full isolation of a sterically hindered and thermally irreversible DAE (BBTE, Fig. 1a) to fill this blank, which consists of one achiral parallel conformer, one pair of anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers, and another pair of ring-closed enantiomers. Their corresponding absolute chiral configurations are fully confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analyses. Notably, these separated enantiomers show absolute enantiospecific photocyclization and cycloreversion both in solution and polymeric matrix. The two pairs of enantiomers are optically pure with enantiomer excess (ee) value over 99%, and thermally stable enough without showing any racemization. As a powerful separation of enantiomers, the mutual ability to control enantiospecific transformation at no loss in racemism can light up bistable chiroptical switches and photomemories with molecular optical rotation as non-destructive readout.

Figure 1. Chemical structures and isomerism of BBTE.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic illustration of conversion relationship of five thermally stable isomers in BBTE. Three ring-open conformers are thermally isolated (red dashed arrows) due to extremely high rotational barrier (pink arrows). While the parallel ring-open isomer is photochemically inert (magenta dash arrows), the anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers are able to reversibly transform to the corresponding ring-closed enantiomers (olive arrows), according to Woodward-Hoffmann rule on photochemical conrotatory reactions of 4n + 2 π-electron system. (b) ORTEP representation of X-ray single crystal structures for p-, M-ap-, P-ap-, (S,S)-c-, and (R,R)-c-BBTE drawn with 50% probability from top and front views (S: yellow; N: blue; C: gray). The solvent molecule (dioxane) in p-BBTE and all the hydrogen atoms are removed for clarity. Atoms with lighter colours indicate their relatively back location. Detailed crystal data including packing diagrams can be found in Supplementary Information.

Results and Discussion

Full separation of five isomers based on sterically hindered benzobis(thiadiazole) ethene bridge

Ring-open (o-) DAEs possess a hexatriene structure whose π-conjugation is interrupted by the steric repulsion between two adjacent aryl rings. Common o-DAEs have two main conformers, photoactive anti-parallel (ap-) conformer and photo-inert parallel (p-) conformer (Fig. 1a), whose exchanging rate is mainly governed by the steric hindrance imposed by the two aryl rings32,33. However, in our previous work on a unique thermally bistable DAE34, the large bulky benzobis(thiadiazole) ethene bridge brings forth very high rotation strain, an energy barrier over 140 kJ mol−1 (Fig. 1a), which completely freezes the interconversion and thus results in the isolation of anti-parallel and parallel conformers (ap- and p-BBTE).

Stereochemically, compared to p-BBTE with symmetry of plane as an achiral isomer, the ring-open conformer ap-BBTE endowing C2 symmetry can be further subdivided into a pair of enantiomers with M and P helixity (Fig. 1a). It should be noted that in general ring-open diarylethenes, these two ap-enantiomers show rapid racemization through fast rotations of aryl groups, via p-conformer as an intermediate. However, because of the blocking of the transformation between ap- and p-conformers in BBTE, the enantiomers of ap-BBTE are also expected to be thermally isolatable. Indeed, chiral HPLC (CHIRALCEL® OD-R) chromatogram of ap-BBTE shows two clear peaks with equal area, which should belong to the two ring-open enantiomeric forms, while that of p-BBTE exhibits only single peak (Supplementary Fig. S2). Moreover, when ap-BBTE is irradiated with ultraviolet (UV) light, another pair of equal-area peaks emerge, which could be assigned as the corresponding ring-closed enantiomers of c-BBTE with two stereogenic centers.

With these in mind, we decided to separate these enantiomers on a preparative column to study their individual photochromism. The direct resolution of two ring-open anti-parallel enantiomers was unsuccessful on commonly used preparative chiral columns. Whereas, the two ring-closed enantiomers could be smoothly separated on Chiralpak IC column (CHIRALCEL®), and later transformed back to their corresponding ring-open enantiomers of ap-BBTE by photocycloreversion (Fig. 1a). As checked by chiral HPLC, the two pairs of enantiomers are optically pure (ee> 99%), and thermally stable enough without showing any racemization, even when kept in acetonitrile at 333 K for 72 h (Supplementary Fig. S3).

In contrast with the previous racemic crystals of ap- and c-BBTE34, we successfully obtained the single crystals for all the five thermally irreversible isomers (Fig. 1b), consisting of one achiral ring-open parallel conformer, one pair of anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers, and another pair of ring-closed enantiomers, by slow evaporation of mixed solvents (THF/dixoane/C2H5OH for p-BBTE, CH2Cl2/CH3CN for ap-BBTE, CH2Cl2/CH3OH for c-BBTE). Accordingly, we are able to fully determine the absolute configurations of these enantiomers by X-ray single crystal analyses. As a matter of fact, we have named them after their absolute configurations: P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE with axial chirality adopt P and M helicity for one pair of anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers, and (R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE with two chiral carbons endow configurations as (R,R) and (S,S) for another pair of ring-closed enantiomers, respectively. It is also found that P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE belong to monoclinic chiral space group C2, and (R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE to orthorhombic chiral space group P212121 (Supplementary Fig. S9–S12 and Table S2, S3). p-BBTE lies in triclinic achiral space group P-134.

Reversibly enantiospecific transformation between photocyclization and cycloreversion with no racemization

We first employed chiral HPLC (CHIRALCEL® OD-R, reversed phase) to monitor the photochromic reactions (Fig. 2). Interestingly, both (S,S)-c-BBTE and M-ap-BBTE show shorter retention time than (R,R)-c-BBTE and P-ap-BBTE, correspondingly, which may be ascribed to the relative weaker affinity of M-helixity or similar structure (S,S configuration) with the cellulose coating on the chiral column. When irradiating the acetonitrile solution of (S,S)-c-BBTE with broadband visible (Vis) light (λ > 470 nm), a peak belonging to M-ap-BBTE is exclusively generated in the chromatogram. Upon irradiation of the above solution with UV light at 280 nm until the photostationary state (PSS), the peak of M-ap-BBTE is decreased and exclusively converted to that of (S,S)-c-BBTE again. Arguably, from the HPLC chromatograms, it is unambiguous that the photochromic reactions proceed enantiospecifically and reversibly in two groups as [(S,S)-c-BBTE and M-ap-BBTE], and [(R,R)-c-BBTE and P-ap-BBTE].

Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of light-driven enantiospecific transformation of c-BBTE and ap-BBTE in CH3CN.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(R,R)- and (S,S)-c-BBTE were bleached with visible light (λ > 470 nm) to generate P- and M-ap-BBTE, and then irradiated with UV light (λ = 280 nm) to reach PSS, respectively. It is noted that (R,R)-c-BBTE, P-ap-BBTE, and PSS of P-ap-BBTE are vertically flipped for better comparison. Reversibly enantiospecific photochromism between photocyclization and cycloreversion can only proceed in [(S,S)-c-BBTE and M-ap-BBTE], and [(R,R)-c-BBTE and P-ap-BBTE]. Column: OD-R (CHIRALCEL® 4.6 diameter × 250 mm); Flow rate: 0.8 mL min−1; eluent: CH3CN/H2O (80/20, v/v); detecting wavelength: 303 nm (isobestic point).

As shown in Fig. 3a, upon irradiation of visible light (λ > 470 nm), the orange red acetonitrile solution of (S,S)-c-BBTE turned colourless, along with a decrease at 515, 403, and 369 nm, and an increase at 282 nm in the absorption spectra, due to the disassembly of π-conjugation of cyclohexadiene structure. Ultimately, the visible absorption is lost completely to yield a colourless solution, indicative of the full cycloreversion to M-ap-BBTE. Upon UV irradiation at 280 nm, the resultant colourless solution became orange red again, closely similar to the original absorption of (S,S)-c-BBTE (Fig. 3a and inset), giving rise to a photocyclization conversion ratio of 92% at PSS (calculated from absorption spectra). In consistent with previous report on racemic ap-BBTE34, chiral M-ap-BBTE indeed exhibits a relative higher photocyclization quantum yield (Φo–c = 73%) than that of common DAEs (Φo–c ≤ 50%), thus guaranteeing the higher cyclization conversion ratio and the fast colouring speed in solution (Table 1). Similar phenomenon and properties are also observed in another group of enantiomers (R,R)-c-BBTE and P-ap-BBTE (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Figure 3. Light-induced spectral changes in enantiospecific photoreactions of c-BBTE and ap-BBTE.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Absorption (a) and CD spectra (b) of (S,S)-c-BBTE, M-ap-BBTE, and PSS of M-ap-BBTE under irradiation of UV light (λ = 280 nm) in CH3CN. Absorption (c) and CD spectra (d) of (S,S)-c-BBTE, M-ap-BBTE, and PSS of M-ap-BBTE under irradiation of UV light (λ = 302 ± 20 nm) in poly(D/L-lactic acid) film (PDLLA, Mw = 2.5 × 105, 1.0 wt%, 35 μm in thickness). (R,R)-c-BBTE, P-ap-BBTE, and p-BBTE are also presented in b for comparison. Insets in a and b: spectral changes of absorption at 515 nm (a) and CD at 259 nm (b) upon irradiation of (S,S)-c-BBTE with visible light (λ > 470 nm) and then UV light (λ = 280 nm). Insets in c and d: spectral changes of absorption at 523 nm and CD changes at 261 nm upon irradiation of (S,S)-c-BBTE with visible light (λ > 470 nm) and then UV light (λ = 302 ± 20 nm). Photos in a and c show the colour changes upon irradiation with UV and visible light, alternatively. OD represents ‘optical density'. The cycloreversion under visible light is fully complete, and the photocyclization under UV light is incomplete, with conversion ratios of 92% in CH3CN and 59% in PDLLA, calculated from absorption spectra.

Table 1. Optical data of (R,R)-c-, (S,S)-c-, P-ap-, and M-ap-BBTE in CH3CN at 293 K.

Compound λOD,max[a] (nm) [ε (103 M−1 cm−1)] λCD,max[a] (nm) [Δε (M−1 cm−1)] Φo-c[b] (%) Φc-o[b] (%) CR[c] (%) [α]633[d] (°) [PSS at 280 nm]
M-ap-BBTE 282 [36.4] 280 [+24.8] 73 — 92 +424 [−1891]
(S,S)-c-BBTE 515 [6.39] 503 [−19.4] — 6.0 >99 −2109
P-ap-BBTE 282 [35.6] 280 [−25.5] 72 — 92 −420 [+1881]
(R,R)-c-BBTE 515 [6.32] 503 [+19.1] — 5.8 >99 +2095
Open in a new tab

[a] Typical absorption and CD maxima of ring-open isomer in UV region and ring-closed isomer in visible region, respectively. OD represents ‘optical density'.

[b] Quantum yields of photocyclization at 313 nm and photocycloreversion at 517 nm, with uncertainty around ±5% and ±0.5%, respectively.

[c] Conversion ratio to ring-closed isomer (under UV irradiation, λ = 280 nm), and ring-open isomer (under visible light irradiation, λ > 470 nm), calculated from absorption spectra.

[d] Specific optical rotation at 633 nm, outside the absorption region (λ < 580 nm) of both ring-open and ring-closed isomers.

Light-driven control in circular dichroism (CD)

Since the two pairs of photo-responsive enantiomers are fully separated and reversibly enantiospecific, we shed much light on CD modulation between photocyclization and cycloreversion. As expected, the CD spectra of (R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE, as well as P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE, show exact mirror images, and thus essentially testifying their enantiotopic nature (Fig. 3b). CD spectrum of (S,S)-c-BBTE exhibits moderately negative Cotton effect in the visible region of 420–580 nm, with the same orientation and relative larger intensity than the reported c-DAEs with (S,S) configuration35,36. It can be assigned to the charge transfer excitation of HOMO → LUMO. Other signals in 353–420 nm (+) and 278–353 nm (−) can also be attributed to the charge transfer excitation. Interestingly, the ring-closed (S,S)-c-BBTE endows an abnormally strong peak at 259 nm (Δε = 116.8 M−1 cm−1), much higher than common c-DAE (less than 25 M−1 cm−1)21,22,29, even close to those famous overcrowded alkenes37 and binaphthyls38,39 with axial chirality. TDDFT calculations (Supplementary Fig. S6–8) demonstrate that there is a high asymmetry in (S,S)-c-BBTE, originating from the photochromic cyclohexadiene center (Fig. 1a, orange unit) and the distorted ethene bridge with two extended thiadiazoles (Fig. 1a, blue unit), and the local excitations of the later mainly contributes to this strong signal in far-UV region. Nonetheless, the axially chiral ring-open M-ap-BBTE also displays several weaker Cotton effects in the near-UV region of 321–450 nm (+) and 297–321 nm (−), belonging to the charge transfer excitation, and those in the far-UV regions of 271–297 nm (+) and 234–271 nm (−) are originated from local excitations of the benzothiophene units. Upon irradiation of the solution of ring-closed (S,S)-c-BBTE with visible light (λ > 470 nm), the CD spectra gradually changed to that of M-ap-BBTE. When later irradiating the bleached solution with UV light at 280 nm, the CD spectra once again turned similar to that of (S,S)-c-BBTE (Fig. 3b and inset), with a conversion ratio of 92% (calculated from CD spectra). Obviously, the chirality of ring-closed isomer c-BBTE containing the asymmetric cyclohexadiene and the distorted ethene bridge can be effectively transferred to the helixity of ring-open isomer ap-BBTE from the central hexatriene moiety (vide infra). Impressively, several photo-switching cycles observed by CD spectroscopy show that little racemization takes place during the photocyclization and cycloreversion (Supplementary Fig. S5). Again, the unique BBTE based on hindered benzobis(thiadiazole)-based ethene bridge induces very high rotation strain to completely freeze the large bulky terminal benzothiophene with no racemization. Here the established reversible light-driven CD modulation provides an all-photonic enantiospecific molecular building block.

Enabling chirality for bistable chiroptical switches and nondestructive readout

Generally for photochromic DAEs, achieving the non-destructive storage40,41,42,43,44 is always a long standing challenge since reading photomemory by absorption spectral changes inevitably induces the molecular photo-excitation, thus suffering from the data loss after certain times of accumulation. However, employing output signals from optical rotation can fundamentally solve the problem30,45,46. In this way, we can detect the light polarization in the region outside their electronic absorption bands (no absorption at this wavelength for ring-open and closed isomers), thus eliminating any photo-excitation induced structural changes. As photomemory materials, the enantiospecific transformation between photocyclization and cycloreversion is well reversibly light-modulated with no racemization, being a delicate molecular platform for chiroptical switches and nondestructive readout. Thus, we attempted to measure the optical rotation of the two isolated pairs of enantiomers of ap-BBTE and c-BBTE in acetonitrile solution at 633 nm, where both ap-BBTE (λ < 440 nm) and c-BBTE (λ < 580 nm) are transparent with no absorption. The specific rotation of (R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE has almost the same absolute value with opposite signs, as well as that of P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE (Table 1). Exactly, the photochromic reaction can also be monitored by specific rotation changes. For instance, M-ap-BBTE exhibited a relatively small value of +424° at 280 nm, while the value decreased to −1891° at PSS, which was close to that of (S,S)-c-BBTE (−2109°). The optical rotation brought forth a large change of −2315°, indicative of a photocyclization conversion of 91%, consistent with the calculation from absorption and CD spectra. Furthermore, these optical rotation values show little changes upon long time placing in the polarimeter with the detecting light (optical filter at 633 nm), suggestive of the promising non-destructive readout capability.

Inspired by these results and in order to further realize practical applications, we fabricated several photochromic films (Fig. 4a), containing 1.0 wt% of (S,S)-c-BBTE in poly(D/L-lactic acid) (PDLLA, Mw = 2.5 × 105). The film (35 μm) showed similar absorption and CD spectra (Fig. 3c–d) with respect to the solution state. In the PDLLA polymeric matrix, its absorption shows slight bathochromic shift (λmax = 523 nm), which can be ascribed to the different polarity in PDLLA matrix, but its absorption edge is still below 600 nm. The orange-red film show excellent cycloreversion with complete bleaching upon irradiation of visible light (λ > 470 nm), but the recolouring progress with UV light (hand-held lamp, λ = 302 ± 20 nm) was not so robust with respect to that in solution, only inducing a photocyclization ratio of 60%, which is commonly found in the films of DAEs44,47,48, mainly due to the inner filter effects and restricted reaction environment in the polymer matrixes.

Figure 4. Non-destructive readout on photochromic film utilizing optical rotation as output signal for photomemories.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic illustration of an all-photonic memory device with non-destructive readout capability. UV (λ = 302 ± 20 nm) and visible (λ > 470 nm) light is used for writing and erasing processes, while detecting optical rotation is selected for reading process, utilizing polarized light (λ = 633 nm). Photochromic film: PDLLA film 60 (μm) containing 1.0 wt% of (S,S)-c-BBTE. (b) Fatigue resistance of optical rotation upon irradiation of visible light (λ > 470 nm) and UV light (λ = 302 ± 20 nm), alternatively. (c) Photo-stability of optical rotation under the irradiation at 633 nm (1.5 mW cm−2), optically filtered from a white LED (3 W). Setting zero point as the threshold for “0” and “1” states can construct an all-photonic molecular binary storage device with excellent fatigue resistance and non-destructive readout capability.

The optical rotation of another thicker film (60 μm) at 633 nm also shows full cycloreversion and partial photocyclization (62%). Fortunately, despite the first “bleaching/colouring” cycle, the following cycles could be stabilized at the specific ratio between ring-open and PSS states, ensuring the fatigue resistance in the polymeric film. As illustrated with a pair of enantiomers [(S,S)-c-BBTE and M-ap-BBTE], the optical rotation value between the two states could maintain almost same even after 10 cycles (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, these values exhibit negligible change even when the film was exposed to the strong light at 633 nm (1.5 mW/cm2) for 120 min (Fig. 4c). Apparently, the reading process of optical rotation with the polarized light (λ = 633 nm) is insensitive to both the ring-open and closed forms, thus eliminating the possible destruction during the writing (UV light, λ = 302 ± 20 nm) and erasing (visible light, λ > 470 nm). Indeed, the PDLLA polymer film with two pairs of BBTE enantiomers can achieve the excellent non-destructive readout ability. As shown in Fig. 4a, an all-photonic molecular binary storage device can be constructed with setting zero point of light-driven optical rotation as the threshold for “0” and “1” states (Fig. 4c), along with excellent fatigue resistance and non-destructive readout capability. More practically, measuring optical rotation value can be further simplified by detecting the intensity of the output light through a polarizer for zero calibration. In this way, the information data are coming on-stream, which can be read on an “on-off” manner based on Malus' law (I = I0cos2θ). In contrast with common light-driven molecular logic gates in solution49, the incorporation into polymer matrix can provide a route toward all solid-state systems for fabricating a layer of all-photonic logic50, especially in encoding optical signals51 and transistor sensors52.

Conclusions

A sterically hindered diarylethene (BBTE) has been designed for absolute enantiospecific photocyclization and cycloreversion. In this unique bistable system, we have unprecedentedly separated all the five thermally irreversible isomers of diarylethenes, consisting of one achiral parallel conformer (p-BBTE), one pair of anti-parallel ring-open enantiomers (P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE), and another pair of ring-closed enantiomers [(R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE]. All the absolute configurations of these isomers are entirely characterized by single crystal X-ray analyses. The intrinsic racemism in common diarylethenes is fundamentally solved, lightening up inner chiral response to light stimulus. As exemplified by the light-driven optical rotation studies in polymeric matrix, we provide a route toward all solid-state systems for fabricating a layer of all-photonic logic. The reversibly and precisely light-driven control in circular dichroism and optical rotation provides a powerful molecular platform for bistable chiroptical switches and photomemories with non-destructive readout capability.

Methods

General

NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker AM-400 spectrometers. CDCl3 were used as solvents with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal reference. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were carried our with a Waters LCT Premier XE spectrometer. HPLC analyses were performed by using an Agilent 1100 instrument equipped with CHIRALCEL® OD-R column (4.6 diameter × 250 mm), at flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1, eluent solvents of CH3CN/H2O (80/20, v/v), detecting at isobestic point wavelength of 303 nm. Absorption and CD spectra were recorded using Agilent Cary 60 and Jasco J-819 spectropolarimeter, respectively. Optical rotation values were determined with a Rudolph Autopol V polarimeter, equipped with an interference filter at 633 nm, containing a 100 mm flow cell at 293 K. Solvents used were analytical grade, except those for optical tests, which were HPLC grade. The photochromic reaction was induced by continuous irradiation using an Hg/Xe lamp (Hamamatsu, LC8 Lightningcure, 200 W) or a white LED (3 W) equipped with a narrow band interference filters for λirr = 280 nm, or a broad band interference filters for λirr > 470 nm, except for the photocyclization in the PDLLA film which was induced by a hand-held UV lamp (0.12 mW cm−2, λ = 302 ± 20 nm) for irradiation.

Full enantiomer separation of BBTE

A pair of ring-closed enantiomers [(R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE] was separated from the racemic c-BBTE by a preparative HPLC equipped with CHIRALCEL® Chiralpak IC (50 diameter × 250 mm, eluent: dichloromethane/n-hexane = 4/6, v/v). Another pair of ring-open enantiomers (P-ap- and M-ap-BBTE) were obtained by irradiating (R,R)-c- and (S,S)-c-BBTE with visible light (λ > 470 nm) in dichloromethane, and then recrystallization from dichloromethane/n-hexane, respectively. (R,R)-c-BBTE:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.01 (s, 6 H), 6.98–7.07 (m, 2 H), 7.29 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 4 H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H). HRMS (ESI positive ion mode for [M + H]+): Calcd for C24H15N4S4, 487.0180; found, 487.0183. [α]63325 = +2095° (c = 1.76 × 10−2 g dL−1 in CH3CN). (S,S)-c-BBTE: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.01 (s, 6 H), 6.99–7.07 (m, 2 H), 7.29 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 4 H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H). HRMS (ESI positive ion mode for [M + H]+): Calcd for C24H15N4S4, 487.0180; found, 487.0179. [α]63325 = −2109° (c = 1.84 × 10−2 g dL−1 in CH3CN). P-ap-BBTE: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.94 (s, 6 H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.23 (m, 2 H), 7.23–7.30 (m, 2 H, overlap with CHCl3), 7.74 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H). HRMS (ESI positive ion mode for [M + H]+): Calcd for C24H15N4S4, 487.0180; found, 487.0175. [α]63325 = −420° (c = 1.76 × 10−2 g dL−1 in CH3CN). M-ap-BBTE: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.94 (s, 6 H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.16–7.23 (m, 2 H), 7.23–7.31 (m, 2 H, overlap with CHCl3), 7.74 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H). HRMS (ESI positive ion mode for [M + H]+): Calcd for C24H15N4S4, 487.0180; found, 487.0177. [α]63325 = +424° (c = 1.84 × 10−2 g dL−1 in CH3CN).

Single crystal X-ray structure determination

The crystallographic data reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition number 1016420 for (S,S)-c-BBTE, 1016419 for (R,R)-c-BBTE, 1016417 for M-ap-BBTE, 1016418 for P-ap-BBTE, and 972736 for p-BBTE. These data can be obtained free of charge form http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Detailed crystallographic analyses are given in the Supplementary Information.

Preparation of photochromic film

The photochromic film was prepared under dark conditions as follows: 2.1 mg (1.0 wt%) of (S,S)-c-BBTE and 203.5 mg (99.0 wt%) of PDLLA (Mw = 2.5 × 105) were dissolved in 2.0 mL of dichloromethane. The solution was filtered by a filtering membrane (0.22 μm) before being spin-coated on quartz plates using a spin-coater. After air drying for 24 h, several films with different thickness (35–80 μm) were thus obtained.

Author Contributions

W.Z., H.T. and W.L. conceived the experiments and designed the study. W.L. carried out the synthesis and chiral separation. W.L., Y.W., M.L. and X.W. performed the optical experiments. X.L. did the quantum chemical calculations. W.L. and Y.X. worked on X-ray single crystal analysis. W.Z. and W.L. wrote manuscript. All authors discussed results and contributed to the interpretation of data.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Enantiospecific photoresponse of sterically hindered diarylethenes for chiroptical switches and photomemories

srep09186-s1.doc (7.7MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National 973 Program (No. 2013CB733700), NSFC for Creative Research Groups (21421004) and Distinguished Young Scholars (21325625), NSFC/China, the Oriental Scholarship, National Major Scientific Technological Special Project (2012YQ15008709), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WJ1416005).

References

  1. Agranat I., Caner H. & Caldwell A. Putting chirality to work: The strategy of chiral switches. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 1, 753–768 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xie J. H. & Zhou Q. L. Magical chiral spiro ligands. Acta Chimica Sinica 72, 778–797 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkovic G., Krongauz V. & Weiss V. Spiropyrans and spirooxazines for memories and switches. Chem. Rev. 100, 1741–1754 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yokoyama Y. Fulgides for memories and switches. Chem. Rev. 100, 1717–1740 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tian H. Data processing on a unimolecular platform. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4710–4712 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pars M. et al. Optical gating with organic building blocks. A quantitative model for the fluorescence modulation of photochromic perylene bisimide dithienylcyclopentene triads. Sci. Rep. 4, 4316 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kundu P. K., Olsen G. L., Kiss V. & Klajn R. Nanoporous frameworks exhibiting multiple stimuli responsiveness. Nat. Commun. 5, 3588 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang G. Y., Song Y. L., Guo X. F., Zhang D. Q. & Zhu D. B. Organic functional molecules towards information processing and high-density information storage. Adv. Mater. 20, 2888–2898 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. Meng F. B. et al. Orthogonally modulated molecular transport junctions for resettable electronic logic gates. Nat. Commun. 5, 3799 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedrichs E. & Simmel F. C. Nucleic-Acid-Based Switches. Molecular Switches Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2011, pp 227–256. [Google Scholar]
  11. Velema W. A. et al. Optical control of antibacterial activity. Nat. Chem. 5, 924–928 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyer J. C. et al. Photomodulation of fluorescent upconverting nanoparticle markers in live organisms by using molecular switches. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 3122–3126 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Irie M., Fukaminato T., Matsuda K. & Kobatake S. Photochromism of diarylethene molecules and crystals: memories, switches, and actuators. Chem. Rev. 114, 12174–12277 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan J. C.-H., Lam W. H. & Yam V. W.-W. A highly efficient silole-containing dithienylethene with excellent thermal stability and fatigue resistance: a promising candidate for optical memory storage materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16994–16997 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kobatake S., Takami S., Muto H., Ishikawa T. & Irie M. Rapid and reversible shape changes of molecular crystals on photoirradiation. Nature 446, 778–781 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu Y. et al. Quantitative photoswitching in bis(dithiazole)ethene enables modulation of light for encoding optical signals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 2090–2094 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen S. J., Chen L. J., Yang H. B., Tian H. & Zhu W. H. Light-triggered reversible supramolecular transformations of multi-bisthienylethene hexagons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13596–13599 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aubert V. et al. Efficient photoswitching of the nonlinear optical properties of dipolar photochromic Zinc(II) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 577–580 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gostl R., Kobin B., Grubert L., Patzel M. & Hecht S. Sterically crowding the bridge of dithienylcyclopentenes for enhanced photoswitching performance. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 14282–14285 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yokoyama Y., Shiozawa T., Tani Y. & Ubukata T. A unified strategy for exceptionally high diastereoselectivity in the photochemical ring closure of chiral diarylethenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 4521–4523 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jin-nouchi H. & Takeshita M. Syntheses and fully diastereospecific photochromic reactions of thiophenophan-1-enes with chiral bridges. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 9638–9644 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakashima T., Yamamoto K., Kimura Y. & Kawai T. Chiral photoresponsive tetrathiazoles that provide snapshots of folding states. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 16972–16980 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yamamoto S., Matsuda K. & Irie M. Absolute asymmetric photocyclization of a photochromic diarylethene derivative in single crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 1636–1639 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kodani T., Matsuda K., Yamada T., Kobatake S. & Irie M. Reversible diastereoselective photocyclization of a diarylethene in a single-crystalline phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9631–9637 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ichikawa T., Morimoto M. & Irie M. Asymmetric photoreaction of a diarylethene in hydrogen-bonded cocrystals with chiral molecules. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 13, 199–204 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. De Jong J. J. D., Lucas L. N., Kellogg R. M., van Esch J. H. & Feringa B. L. Reversible optical transcription of supramolecular chirality into molecular chirality. Science 304, 278–281 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Dijken D. J. et al. Autoamplification of molecular chirality through the induction of supramolecular chirality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5073–5077 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pace T. C. S., Müller V., Li S., Lincoln P. & Andréasson J. Enantioselective cyclization of photochromic dithienylethenes bound to DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 4393–4396 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Takeshita M. & Yamato T. Enantioselective photochromic reaction of a [2.2]metacyclophan-1-ene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2156–2157 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Takeshita M. & Yamato T. Reversible optical rotation change according to the enantiospecific photochromic reaction of [2.2]metacyclophan-1-ene. Chem. Lett. 33, 844–845 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  31. Walko M. & Feringa B. L. The isolation and photochemistry of individual atropisomers of photochromic diarylethenes. Chem. Commun. 1745–1747 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakayama Y., Hayashi K. & Irie M. Thermally irreversible photochromic systems. Reversible photocyclization of 1,2-diselenenylethene and 1,2-diindolylethene derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 55, 2592–2596 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  33. Irie M. & Mohri M. Thermally irreversible photochromic systems. Reversible photocyclization of diarylethene derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 53, 803–808 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  34. Li W. L. et al. Separation of photoactive conformers based on hindered diarylethenes: efficient modulation in photocyclization quantum yields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 4603–4607 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yamaguchi T. et al. Enantioresolution and absolute stereochemistry of a photochromic bis(benzo[b]thienyl)ethene compound. Enantiomer 6, 309–311 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yokoyama Y., Hosoda N., Osano Y. T. & Sasaki C. Absolute stereochemistry and CD spectra of resolved enantiomers of the colored form of a photochromic dithienylethene. Chem. Lett. 27, 1093–1094 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  37. Feringa B. L. In control of motion: From molecular switches to molecular motors. Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 504–513 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Takaya H. et al. Practical synthesis of (R)- or (S)-2,2′-bis(diarylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyls (BINAPs). J. Org. Chem. 51, 629–635 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  39. Proni G., Spada G. P., Lustenberger P., Welti R. & Diederich F. Conformational analysis in solution of C2-symmetric 1,1′-binaphthyl derivatives by circular dichroism spectroscopy and cholesteric induction in nematic mesophases. J. Org. Chem. 65, 5522–5527 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Uchida K., Saito M., Murakami A., Nakamura S. & Irie M. Non-destructive readout of the photochromic reactions of diarylethene derivatives using infrared light. Adv. Mater. 15, 121–125 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  41. Takeshita M., Tanaka A. & Hatanaka T. Photoreversible refractive index change of [2.2]metacyclophan-1-ene in PMMA film. Opt. Mater. 29, 499–502 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  42. Berberich M., Krause A.-M., Orlandi M., Scandola F. & Würthner F. Toward fluorescent memories with nondestructive readout: photoswitching of fluorescence by intramolecular electron transfer in a diaryl ethene-perylene bisimide photochromic system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6616–6619 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fukaminato T. et al. Single-molecule fluorescence photoswitching of a diarylethene−perylenebisimide dyad: non-destructive fluorescence readout. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4984–4990 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lim S.-J., An B.-K., Jung S. D., Chung M.-A. & Park S. Y. Photoswitchable organic nanoparticles and a polymer film employing multifunctional molecules with enhanced fluorescence emission and bistable photochromism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6346–6350 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wigglesworth T. J., Sud D., Norsten T. B., Lekhi V. S. & Branda N. R. Chiral discrimination in photochromic helicenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7272–7273 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Okuyama T., Tani Y., Miyake K. & Yokoyama Y. Chiral helicenoid diarylethene with large change in specific optical rotation by photochromism. J. Org. Chem. 72, 1634–1638 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim M.-S., Maruyama H., Kawai T. & Irie M. Refractive index changes of amorphous diarylethenes containing 2,4-diphenylphenyl substituents. Chem. Mater. 15, 4539–4543 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  48. Boixel J. et al. Second-Order NLO switches from molecules to polymer films based on photochromic cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5367–5375 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Andréasson J. et al. All-photonic multifunctional molecular logic device. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11641–11648 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. de Silva A. P. Molecular computing: a layer of logic. Nature 454, 417–418 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yoon J. Encoding optical signals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 6600–6601 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Knopfmacher O. et al. Highly stable organic polymer field-effect transistor sensor for selective detection in the marine environment. Nat. Commun. 5, 2954 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Enantiospecific photoresponse of sterically hindered diarylethenes for chiroptical switches and photomemories

srep09186-s1.doc (7.7MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES