Skip to main content
Saudi Medical Journal logoLink to Saudi Medical Journal
. 2014;35(12):1538–1544.

Saudi Oncology Society clinical management guideline series

Colorectal cancer 2014

Shouki N Bazarbashi 1,, Ali M Alzahrani 1, Mohammed M Rahal 1, Ahmed S Al-Shehri 1, Ali H Aljubran 1, Nasser A Alsanea 1, Omar A Al-Obeed 1, Magdy S Kandil 1, Jamal E Zekri 1, Ashwaq A Al Olayan 1, Abdullah A Alsharm 1, Khaled S Balaraj 1, Mosa A Fagih 1
PMCID: PMC4362171  PMID: 25491226

Colorectal cancer ranked first in incidence among Saudi males and third among Saudi females for the last several years according to Saudi Cancer Registry data.1 A total of 1033 cases accounting for 10.4% of all newly diagnosed cases were reported in 2010.1 The overall age standardized rate (ASR) was 9.6/100,000 with ASR of 9.9/100,000 for males and 9.2/100,000 for females. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years for males (range 2-100 years) and 55 years for females (range 13-100 years).1

A committee of experts in the medical and surgical treatment of colorectal cancer was established under the supervision of the Saudi Oncology Society (SOS). The evidence adopted in these guidelines is rated at 3 levels: 1) Evidence level-1 (EL-1) (highest level) evidence from phase III randomized trials or meta-analyses; 2- EL-2 (intermediate-level) evidence from good phase II trials or phase III trials with limitations; and 3- EL-3 (low-level) from retrospective or observational data and/or expert opinion. This easy-to-follow grading system is convenient for the reader and allows accurate assessment of the applicability of the guideline in individual patients.4

Ultimately, it was agreed that all colorectal cancer cases are preferably seen or discussed in a multidisciplinary form

  1. Pre-treatment evaluation:

    • 1.1.
      Clinical examination, including rigid proctosigmoidoscopy for rectal cancer
    • 1.2.
      Blood count, liver, and renal function tests
    • 1.3.
      Chest x-ray
    • 1.4.
      Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level
    • 1.5.
      CT scan of abdomen and pelvis (including chest in rectal cancer cases)
    • 1.6.
      Full length colonoscopy
    • 1.7.
      Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for rectal cancer
      Rectal cancer will be defined as tumors within 15 cm from the anal verge on rigid proctosigmoidoscopy, and below the sacral promontory on computed tomography (CT) scan.
  2. Surgical pathology report requirements: The following parameters should be mentioned in all surgical pathology reports of colorectal cancer:3

    • 2.1
      Specimen
    • 2.2
      Procedure
    • 2.3
      Specimen length
    • 2.4
      Tumor site
    • 2.5
      Tumor size
    • 2.6
      Macroscopic tumor perforation
    • 2.7
      Macroscopic intactness of mesorectum
    • 2.8
      Histologic type
    • 2.9
      Histologic grade
    • 2.10
      Histologic features suggestive of microsatellite instability
    • 2.11
      Microscopic tumor extension
    • 2.12
      Margins
    • 2.12
      Treatment effect (applicable to carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant therapy)
    • 2.12
      Vascular (large vessel) invasion (V)
    • 2.13
      Lymphatic (small vessel) invasion (L)
    • 2.14
      Discontinuous extramural extension (irregular tumor nodules in pericolorectal adipose tissue without histologic evidence of residual lymph node)
    • 2.15
      Perineural invasion
    • 2.16
      Mismatch repair (MMR) status by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in node negative tumors
    • 2.17
      Type of pre-existing polyp in which invasive carcinoma arose from
    • 2.18
      Pathologic staging (pTNM)
  3. Staging:

    The American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) - 2007 pathological staging system will be used.4

  4. Treatment:

    • 4.1.
      Clinically localized resectable colon cancer:
      • 4.1.1.
        Surgical resection according to location:
        • 4.1.1.1.
          Right colonic cancer includes tumors in the cecum, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure, and are treated with a right hemicolectomy (EL-3).
        • 4.1.1.2.
          Left colonic cancer includes tumors in the transverse colon, splenic flexure, and descending colon, and are treated with a left partial / left hemicolectomy (EL-2)
        • 4.1.1.3.
          Sigmoid colon cancer includes tumor located in the totally peritonealized part of the colon between the descending colon and the sacral promontory. It is treated with a sigmoid colectomy (EL-2)
        • 4.1.1.4.
          Laparoscopic assisted resection is equal to open resection5 (EL-1)
        • 4.1.1.5.
          A proximal and distal 5 cm margin is needed for colonic cancer colectomies6 (EL-2)
        • 4.1.1.6.
          Surgery should be performed by a colorectal surgeon
      • 4.1.2.
        Stage I: no adjuvant therapy required
      • 4.1.3.
        Stage II (Node negative), average risk: no indication of adjuvant chemotherapy7
      • 4.1.4.
        Stage II (Node negative), high risk: treatment will depend on the MMR status:
        • 4.1.4.1.
          Patients with deficient MMR status will be recommended for observation only10 (EL-2)
        • 4.1.4.2.
          Patients with proficient MMR status will be recommended for adjuvant chemotherapy with one of the following options: single agent capecitabine or Mayo Clinic regimen (5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin) for 6 months9 (EL-3)
          High risk factors:
          • - T4 lesion
          • - Less than 12 removed lymph nodes
          • - Lymphovascular or perinural invasion
          • - Obstruction
          • - Perforation
          • - Poorly differentiated histology
          • - Positive margin (if not considered for re-resection)
      • 4.1.5.
        Stage III (node positive): Adjuvant FOLFOX 6 for 6 months (12 cycles)10 (EL-1), or alternatively 8 cycles of XELOX regimen11 (EL-1). Elderly patients and those with performance status (PS) of 3 may be offered single agent capecitabine for 6 months12
      • 4.1.6.
        Follow up: clinical examination, CEA level every 6 months for 5 years. A CT-scan annually for first 3 years in node positive patients (EL-3). Colonoscopy within 6 months if not carried out preoperatively then after 3 years, then every 5 years if normal
    • 4.2.
      Clinically localized resectable rectal cancer:
      • 4.2.1.
        Surgical resection procedure will depend on the location of the tumor (anterior resection versus abdomino-perineal resection). The following should be ascertained:
        • 4.2.1.1.
          Rectal cancer includes tumors between the dentate line in the anal canal and the sacral promontory
        • 4.2.1.2.
          Surgery should be carried out by a colorectal surgeon
        • 4.2.1.3.
          Total mesorectal excision should be performed13
        • 4.2.1.4.
          For upper third rectal tumors, a distal mesorectal margin of 5 cm should be excised (however, 2 cm distal margin is needed for lower third rectum)14 (EL-1)
        • 4.2.1.5.
          Margins less than 2 cm intra-operatively dictate the need for a frozen section to prove negativity
        • 4.2.1.6.
          The distal doughnut is not considered part of the distal 2 cm distal margin in rectal cancer
        • 4.2.1.7.
          Patients with a compromised lumen (does not allow intubation by 20 mm rigid proctosigmoidoscope) should have elective stoma (outside radiation field) prior to starting pre-operative radiation
      • 4.2.2.
        Endo-anal or transsacral resection will be offered to selected patient populations with all the following factors:15
        • 4.2.2.1.
          Tumor up to 8 cm from anal verge. For tumors located more than 8 cm, trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is feasible.
        • 4.2.2.2.
          Tumor less than 3 cm in maximum diameter
        • 4.2.2.3.
          Freely mobile tumors
        • 4.2.2.4.
          T1 on endoscopic ultrasound or MRI
        • 4.2.2.5.
          Node negative on MRI ± endoscopic ultrasound
        • 4.2.2.6.
          Well or moderately differentiated tumors
        • 4.2.2.7.
          Absence of lymphovascular or peri-neural invasion
        • 4.2.2.8.
          3 mm negative margin
          In case of violation of any of the above, surgery should be offered. If surgery is not an option, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be offered (EL-3)
      • 4.2.3.
        All clinically T3-4 or N positive lesions will receive pre-operative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The irradiation will consist of 5040 cGy in 28 fractions and the chemotherapy will consist of capecitabine or infusional 5-Fluorouracil16 (EL-1). Surgery will be performed 6-8 weeks after the end of radiation therapy. Short course radiation 2500 cGy in 5 fractions with surgical resection in one week can be considered if sphincter saving is not an option17 (EL-1)
      • 4.2.4.
        All patients with pre-operative clinical stage T3 or 4 and or node positive disease who received pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy will have one of the following options in the adjuvant setting:
        • 4.2.4.1.
          Observation (EL-1)18
        • 4.2.4.2.
          Single agent capecitabine for 6 cycles19 (EL-3)
        • 4.2.4.3.
          FOLFOX or XELOX for 4 months20,21 (EL-1)
      • 4.2.5.
        Adjuvant therapy for early stage rectal cancer (who did not receive pre-operative treatment) will be as follows:
        • 4.2.5.1.
          T2 tumor: no further therapy
        • 4.2.5.2.
          T3-4 or positive nodes: will receive adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (same as pre-op) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with either single agent capecitabine, infusional 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin21 (EL-1) or XELOX / FOLFOX for 4 months20,21 (EL-3)
      • 4.2.6.
        Follow up: (see section 4.1.6)
    • 4.3.
      Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic colon or rectal cancer:
      • 4.3.1.
        Surgery:
        • 4.3.1.1.
          Patients with locally advanced or metastatic colon or rectal cancer and compromised colonic lumen should have a colonic stent (for colon cancer), a stoma, or resection (for colon or rectal cancer) prior to treatment (EL-3)
        • 4.3.1.2.
          Patients with liver-only metastasis or lung-only metastasis can be considered for resection (metastatectomy) up front or after a period of pre-operative chemotherapy if initially potentially unresectable. The decision for resectability will be made by the operating surgeon (EL-2). Following resection of metastatic liver or lung lesions, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX or XELOX for a total of 6 months of chemotherapy (including pre-operative).24 Options of pre-operative chemotherapy if unresectable metastasis include:
          • 4.3.1.2.1.
            FOLFIRI + Cetuximab23 (EL-1) or FOLFOX + panitumumab24 if RAS wild type (EL-1)
          • 4.3.1.2.2.
            FOLFOXIRI (regardless of their RAS status)25 (EL-1)
          • 4.3.1.2.3.
            FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or XELOX (+ Bevacizumab) if RAS mutant26
      • 4.3.2.
        Palliative chemotherapy
        • 4.3.2.1.
          Patients with locally advanced unresectable rectal tumors can be offered palliative systemic chemotherapy (see below) followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery if they became resectable (EL-3)
        • 4.3.2.2.
          Unresectable metastatic disease: patients will be treated with chemotherapy with palliative intent. The option of chemotherapy will depend on multiple factors including patient age, performance status, co-morbid conditions, and RAS mutational status
        • 4.3.2.3.
          Options of palliative chemotherapy for patients with good performance status (PS 0-2), include one of the following:
          • 4.3.2.3.1.
            FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or XELOX (+ Bevacizumab)27-30 (EL-1) regardless of RAS status (EL-1)
          • 4.3.2.3.2.
            FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + cetuximab (for wild type RAS tumors) 22,30 (EL-1)
          • 4.3.2.3.3.
            FOLFOX + panitumumab31 (EL-1)
          • 4.3.2.3.4.
            Patients who might not tolerate oxaliplatin or irinotecan containing regimens may be considered for single agent capecitabine ± bevacizumab31
      • 4.3.3.
        Duration of palliative therapy: Patients should continue chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients on oxaliplatin containing regimen are preferable to have their oxaliplatin stopped after 6 cycles, with continuation of other medications (LV5FU2 or capecitabine + Bevacizumab)32-34 (EL-1)
      • 4.3.4.
        Second line therapy: Patients who progress on first line chemotherapy, and have good PS, will receive second line therapy depending on the first line agents used with the following options:
        • 4.3.4.1.
          Re-introduction of oxaliplatin if they were on maintenance with capecitabine or LV5FU2 ± bevacizumab34 (EL-1)
        • 4.3.4.2.
          FOLFIRI, or single agent Irinotecan if the first line was oxaliplatin based27,35 (EL-1)
        • 4.3.4.3.
          FOLFOX/ XELOX, if the first line is irinotecan based27,36 (EL-1)
        • 4.3.4.4.
          Consider adding one of the following targeted therapy to the above chemotherapy:
          • 4.3.4.4.1.
            Cetuximab or panitumumab, if FOLFIRI or single agent irinotecan to be used in tumor with wild type RAS status37,38 (EL-1) or
          • 4.3.4.4.2.
            Bevacizumab to any of the above chemotherapy regimens regardless of RAS status39 (EL-1) or
          • 4.3.4.4.3.
            Aflibercept, if FOLFIRI is to be used as second line and regardless of the RAS status40 (EL-1)
      • 4.3.5.
        Third line therapy: Patients failing second line therapy and those who have good PS and RAS wild type tumor can be offered cetuximab and irinotecan, cetuximab alone, or panitumumab alone if they did not receive them before41-43 (EL-1)
      • 4.3.6.
        Fourth line therapy: Patients who progress despite receiving oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab, and cetuximab or panitumumab have the option of best supportive care (BSC) of regorafenib and BSC44 (EL-1)

New Peer Reviews.

Join our team of expert peer reviewers for the Saudi Medical Journal by sending an enquiry and summarized CV to info@smj.org.sa. Note that SMJ reviewers, whose reviews are returned on time and are judged satisfactory by the Editors, may receive 1 CME credit per review, with a maximum of 5 credits per year, from the Saudi Council for Health Specialties.

References

  • 1.Riyadh (KSA): Saudi Cancer Registry; 2014. Saudi Cancer Registry. Cancer Incidence Report Saudi Arabia 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jazieh AR Saudi Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee. The lung cancer management guidelines 2012. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(Suppl 1):S4–S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jass JR, O’Brien MJ, Riddell RH, Snover DC. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP). Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2007;450:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0302-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. 7th ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2010. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jackson TD, Kaplan GG, Arena G, Page JH, Rogers SO., Jr Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:439–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583–596. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.8.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Figueredo A, Coombes ME, Mukherjee S. Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3:CD005390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005390.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sargent DJ, Shi Q, Yothers G, Tejpar S, Bertagnolli MM, Thibodeau SN, et al., editors. Prognostic impact of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in 7,803 stage II/III colon cancer (CC) patients (pts): A pooled individual pt data analysis of 17 adjuvant trials in the ACCENT database. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O’Connell MJ, Mailliard JA, Kahn MJ, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, et al. Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:246–250. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.André T, Boni C, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T, Topham C, et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3109–3116. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haller DG, Tabernero J, Maroun J, de Braud F, Price T, Van Cutsem E, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1465–1471. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, Abt M, Burris H, 3rd, Carrato A, et al. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2696–2704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993;341:457–460. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wolmark N, Cruz I, Redmond CK, Fisher B, Fisher ER. Tumor size and regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. A preliminary analysis from the NSABP clinical trials. Cancer. 1983;51:1315–1322. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830401)51:7<1315::aid-cncr2820510723>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Minsky BD, Rich T, Recht A, Harvey W, Mies C. Selection criteria for local excision with or without adjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Cancer. 1989;63:1421–1429. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890401)63:7<1421::aid-cncr2820630732>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O’Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1927–1934. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:980–987. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704033361402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Bensadoun RJ, et al. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:184–190. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70599-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:579–588. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rodel C, Liersch T, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Graeven U, Hothorn T, et al. German Rectal Cancer Study Group, editor Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus 5-fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5 Suppl):3500. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hong YS, Nam BH, Kim KP, Lee JL, Park JO, Park YS, et al., editors. Alexandria (VA): American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2014. Adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL) for rectal cancer patients whose postoperative yp stage 2 or 3 after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: Updated results of 3-year disease-free survival from a randomized phase II study (The ADORE) [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1007–1016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60455-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–1417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1346–1355. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, Pfanner E, Allegrini G, Barbara C, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–1676. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2013–2019. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tournigand C, André T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:229–237. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ducreux M, Bennouna J, Hebbar M, Ychou M, Lledo G, Conroy T, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/ leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:682–690. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–2342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Venook A, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti FI, Mahoney MR, O’Neil BH, et al. Alexandria (VA): American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2014. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance), SWOG, and ECOG CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–1034. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Mineur L, André T, Bennamoun M, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5727–5733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, et al. Bevacizumab +capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial bevacizumab +XELOX treatment in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: phase III ‘Stop and Go’ study results--a Turkish Oncology Group Trial. Oncology. 2013;85:328–335. doi: 10.1159/000355914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koopman M, Simkens LH, Ten Tije A, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, et al. Alexandria (VA): American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2014. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The phase III CAIRO3 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clarke SJ, Yip S, Brown C, van Hazel GA, Ransom DT, Goldstein D, et al. Single-agent irinotecan or FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer;results of a randomised phase II study (DaVINCI) and meta-analysis [corrected] Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1826–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, Butts C, Navarro M, Bang YJ, Goel R, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/ folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1720–1726. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L, Scheithauer W, Abubakr YA, Lutz MP, et al. EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2311–2319. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, et al. Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/-}panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:107–116. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, Österlund P, Greil R, Van Cutsem E, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70477-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, Prenen H, Prausová J, Macarulla T, et al. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3499–3506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–345. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–1765. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–1664. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Saudi Medical Journal

RESOURCES