A total of 195 case of pancreatic cancer have been diagnosed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in 2010 accounting for 2.5% of all cancers for that year.1 The age standardized rate was 2.2/100,000 for males and 1.6/100,000 for females.
A committee of experts in the medical and surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer was established under the supervision of the Saudi Oncology Society (SOS).
The evidence adopted in these guidelines is rated at 3 levels: 1) Evidence level (EL)-1 (highest level) evidence from phase III randomized trials or meta-analyses; 2) EL-2 (intermediate-level) evidence from good phase II trials or phase III trials with limitations; and 3) EL-3 (low-level) from retrospective or observational data and/or expert opinion. This easy-to-follow grading system is convenient for the reader and allows accurate assessment of the applicability of the guidelines in individual patients.2
All pancreatic cancer cases are preferably seen or discussed in a multidisciplinary form.
-
Pre-treatment evaluation
-
1.1Clinical examination, including age, performance status (PS), and degree of weight loss
-
1.2Blood count, liver, and renal function
-
1.3Tumor marker: CA19.9 level
-
1.4Computed tomography (CT) scan of chest, abdomen, and pelvis (preferably triple phase, spiral)5 (EL-1)
-
1.5Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (optional) ± fine-needle aspiration (EL-2)
-
1.6Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) (EL-2)
-
1.7Positron emission tomography (PET) scan (optional) (EL-2)
-
1.8Laparoscopy in resectable cases (optional) (EL-2)
-
1.1
-
Surgical pathology report requirement. The following parameters should be mentioned in all surgical pathology reports of pancreatic cancer:
-
2.1Specimen type
-
2.2Tumor size
-
2.3Histologic grade: G
-
2.4Primary tumor extent of invasion: T
-
2.5Regional lymph node: N
-
2.5.1Number of nodes recovered
-
2.5.2Number of nodes involved
-
2.5.1
-
2.6Metastasis: M
-
2.7Margins: surgical clearance in mm
-
2.8Whipple’s resection
-
2.8.1.Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin
-
2.8.2.Post margin
-
2.8.3.Portal vein margin
-
2.8.4.Pancreatic neck margin
-
2.8.5.Enteric margin
-
2.8.1.
-
2.9Lymphatic invasion: L
-
2.10Vascular invasion: V
-
2.11Perineural invasion: P
-
2.12Final stage: G, T, N, M, L, V, P
-
2.1
-
Staging classifications:
The American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC)- 2007 pathological staging system will be used.3
-
Treatment:
-
4.1Assessment of resectability: Tumors will be considered
-
4.1.1Resectable: if there are clear fat planes around celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and have patent superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and portal vein
-
4.1.2Unresectable: if there is invasion of celiac trunk and SMA or if there is an occlusion of SMV or portal vein. Invasion of the superior mesenteric or portal vein is no longer an absolute contraindication. These veins can be resected partially with as much as 50% narrowing of the lumen
- 4.1.3
-
4.1.1
-
4.2Management of resectable pancreatic cancer:
- 4.2.1
-
4.2.2Adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. This is offered to all patients with pathological stage: T1-T4, N0-N1, and R0-R1 resection. Treatment consists of single agent gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days one, 8, and 15. Cycle repeated every 28 days, for a total of 6 cycles8 (EL-1)
-
4.2.3Post-operative radiation is a possible option for R1-R2 resection. Radiotherapy dose should be 45-54 Gy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day) (EL-2)
-
4.3Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: options include one of the following:
-
4.3.1Planned upfront resection. Further therapy will depend on findings during surgery:
-
4.3.1.1If found resectable: perform pancreatico-doudenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (see Item 4.2.2) (EL-1)
-
4.3.1.2If found unresectable: perform biopsy, consider doing bypass surgery and celiac plexus block. Postoperatively, patients can be offered chemotherapy alone (see item 4.4.2) or chemoradiotherapy11 (EL-2).
-
4.3.1.2.1Options of chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy include:
-
4.3.1.2.2Radiotherapy dose should be 45-54 Gy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day) 10 (EL-2)
-
4.3.1.2.1
-
4.3.1.1
-
4.3.2Planned for upfront neoadjuvant therapy. Patient should have confirmatory tissue biopsy followed by either palliative chemotherapy (EL-2) or chemoradiotherapy (EL-2) (see item 4.3.1.2.1 and 4.3.1.2.2). Patients with major response can be considered for re-exploration and possible resection.
-
4.3.1
-
4.4Management of locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. Patients should have the following:
-
4.4.1Tissue biopsy
-
4.4.2Palliative chemotherapy with one of the following options:
-
4.4.2.1Single agent gemcitabine: dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days one, 8, 15. Cycle repeated every 28 days, until progression (EL-1)
-
4.4.2.2Gemcitabine based combinations (gemcitabine + fluoropyrimidines or gemcitabine + cisplatin)11 (EL-1)
-
4.4.2.3FOLFORINOX combination chemotherapy12 (combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) in patients with PS 0-1 by ECOG scale (EL-1)
-
4.4.2.1
-
4.4.3Palliative chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine 11 (see item 4.3.1.2.1.3)
-
4.4.1
-
4.5Management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients may be offered palliative chemotherapy. The choice depends on patient age, PS, and patient choice after an informed consent. Chemotherapy is given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Those options include:
-
4.5.1Single agent gemcitabine (EL-1)
- 4.5.2
-
4.5.3FOLFORINOX combination chemotherapy12 in patients with PS 0-1 by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale (EL-1)
-
4.5.4Patients not fit for chemotherapy should be given best supportive care. This includes, but is not restricted to pain management (including nerve block of celiac plexus, stenting for biliary obstruction. and duodenal obstruction)
-
4.5.1
-
4.6Management of locally recurrent disease: options include
-
4.6.1Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy dose should be 45-54 Gy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day)9 (EL-1)
-
4.6.2Palliative chemotherapy (see item 4.5) (EL-1)
-
4.6.3Best supportive care for unfit patients (see item 4.5.4)
-
4.6.1
-
4.1
Footnotes
Disclosure.
Supplements.
*Supplements will be considered for work including proceedings of conferences or subject matter covering an important topic
*Material can be in the form of original work or abstracts.
*Material in supplements will be for the purpose of teaching rather than research.
*The Guest Editor will ensure that the financial cost of production of the supplement is covered.
*Supplements will be distributed with the regular issue of the journal but further copies can be ordered upon request.
*Material will be made available on Saudi Medical Journal website
References
- 1.Riyadh (KSA): Saudi Cancer Registry; 2014. Saudi Cancer Registry. Cancer Incidence Report in Saudi Arabia 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jazieh AR Saudi Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee. The lung cancer management guidelines 2012. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(Suppl 1):S4–S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: part I, evaluation of arterial involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:827–831. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, Zyromski NJ, Schmidt CM, Jacobson LE, et al. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1338–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Talamonti M. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a new classification for an old challenge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1019–1020. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.02.902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg. 2007;246:246–253. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259993.17350.3a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Al-Haddad M, Martin JK, Nguyen J, Pungpapong S, Raimondo M, Woodward T, et al. Vascular resection and reconstruction for pancreatic malignancy: a single center survival study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1168–1174. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0216-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, Gellert K, Langrehr J, Ridwelski K, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–277. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loehrer PJ, Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, Wagner L, Brell JM, Cella D, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4105–4112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huguet F, Girard N, Guerche CS, Hennequin C, Mornex F, Azria D. Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2269–2277. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heinemann V, Boeck S, Hinke A, Labianca R, Louvet C. Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabinebased combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, Valle JW, Smith D, Steward W, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5513–5518. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–1703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]