Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Apr;20(2):164–168. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328042bae0

Emerging epilepsy models: insights from mice, flies, worms and fish

Scott C Baraban 1
PMCID: PMC4362672  NIHMSID: NIHMS232299  PMID: 17351486

Abstract

Purpose of review

Animal models provide a means to investigate fundamental mechanisms of abnormal electrical discharge (i.e., seizures). Understanding the pathogenesis of epilepsy and therapy development have greatly benefited from these models. Here we review recent mouse mutants featuring spontaneous seizures and simpler organisms.

Recent findings

New genetically engineered mice provide additional insights to cellular mechanisms underlying seizure generation (BK calcium-activated potassium channels and interneuron-expressed sodium channels), genetic interactions that exacerbate seizure phenotype (Scn2a, Kcnq2 and background) and neurodevelopmental influences (Dlx transcription factors). Mutants for neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, Glut-1 deficiency and aquaporin channels highlight additional seizure phenotypes in mice. Additional models in Caenorhabditis elegans (Lis-1) and Danio rerio (pentylenetetrazole) highlight a reductionist approach. Taking further advantage of ‘simple’ organisms, antiepileptic drugs and genetic modifiers of seizure activity are being uncovered in Drosophila.

Summary

Studies of epilepsy in mutant mice provide a framework for understanding critical features of the brain that regulate excitability. These, and as yet undiscovered, mouse mutants will continue to serve as the foundation for basic epilepsy research. Interestingly, an even greater potential for analyzing epileptic phenotypes may lie in the more widespread use of genetically tractable organisms such as worms, flies and zebrafish.

Keywords: epilepsy, invertebrate, model, organism, seizure

Introduction

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent self-sustaining bursts of abnormal electrical brain activity. Our understanding of how these bursts of electrical activity are generated, and more importantly how this activity can be reduced, has greatly benefited from animal model research. Traditional work in the epilepsy field relies on chemical or stimulus-evoked paradigms to generate seizure activity and spontaneous epileptic phenotypes, largely in rodents. With the advent of genetically modified mice, reports of ‘epileptic’ mutant mice now total nearly 100 models in the current literature. In large part, these mutant mice feature a general inactivation (or ‘knockout’) of a specific gene and confirm much of what was already known about the delicate balance between excitation and inhibition in the central nervous system (CNS). New mice described in this review highlight seemingly lesser known pathways in the control of CNS excitability, genetic modifiers or signaling molecules that lead to subtype-specific cell loss and subsequent circuit modification. Where this review attempts to diverge from the many books and articles devoted to animal models [1,2,35] is in the consideration of organisms not normally associated with epilepsy research. Although enjoying wide use in the general field of neurobiology, worms, fruit flies and zebrafish have only recently been explored as animal models of epilepsy. Some of these studies are described here. The goal of this brief review is not to dismiss traditional rodent models – indeed they remain important contributors to our overall understanding of seizures and epileptogenesis – but rather to put simpler organisms in the lexicon of epilepsy studies.

Gene interactions and novel epilepsy phenotypes revealed in genetically modified mice

In the past decade, the number of genetically modified mice exhibiting seizures (or reduced sensitivity to convulsant manipulations) has risen exponentially, with no clear endpoint in sight. The diversity of ‘epilepsy’ genes implicated in these mouse seizure phenotypes is staggering. From these mice ion channel, postsynaptic receptor, and genes required for neuronal migration were identified. Homologous recombination techniques remain the most popular method for gene inactivation in mice and two recently described ion channel knockouts present with interesting epileptic phenotypes. First, a β4 subunit of the calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel was shown to control burst firing duration and spike frequency adaptation in dentate granule cells. Deletion of the β4 subunit in mice resulted in nonconvulsive partial onset seizures [6••]. Second, inactivation of a voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav1.1) linked to severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI) reduced sodium current density in cultured hippocampal interneurons. Nav1.1 null mice exhibited ataxia and seizures early in the postnatal period progressing to periodic generalized clonic and bilateral forelimb convulsions by early adulthood [7]. Interestingly, video-electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings confirmed ictal activity patterns in roughly 40% of heterozygous mutants surviving into adulthood. Whether this incomplete phenotypic penetrance reflects compensatory changes in other sodium channel subunits (Nav1.3 was found to be upregulated) or background modifier genes (seizure phenotypes were more severe on a BL/6 background) or both, remains to be explored further.

In humans, Glut-1 deficiency is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by infantile seizures, developmental delay and ataxia. A recent study [8] indicated that homozygous deletion of GLUT-1 in mice is embryonic lethal (as expected) but heterozygous GLUT-1 mice exhibit interesting epileptic phenotypes. Not unlike other mice described in this section, video-EEG recordings were used to identify cortical activity patterns reminiscent of generalized or partial lateralized seizures, bilateral spike-and-wave seizures or brief bilateral rhythmic spike discharges in GLUT-1 mutants. Novel seizure phenotypes were also described in a mouse featuring knock-in of a α4 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (ADNFLE) [9]. Thalamic cell cultures and synaptosomes prepared from heterozygous mice harboring an L9A’ mutation were hypersensitive to nicotine. Although these mice were more sensitive to nicotine-induced seizure-like behavior no spike-wave discharges were observed in any of the brain regions examined.

Observations of variable epileptic phenotypes based on background strain differences were initially described by Schauwecker and Steward [10], and could explain some of the discrepancies described here. Further highlighting the notion of multiple gene interactions, a moderate epileptic phenotype observed in a transgenic mouse carrying a voltage-gated sodium channel mutation (Scn2aQ54) associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) was shown to be enhanced when crossed into a Kcnq2 mutant mouse background [11]. This same group [12] also described a spike-and-wave absence seizure phenotype in backcrossed C3H/He mice, further demonstrating the digenic (and possible even polygenic) factors that may underlie the development of epilepsy. A long known role for inhibition in epilepsy was recently confirmed in a novel mutant mouse featuring inactivation of a transcription factor (Dlx1) necessary for interneuron development and migration [13]. Interestingly, cortical and hippocampal interneurons are initially present in normal numbers and locations in these mice but a subgroup of somatostatin, neuropeptide Y and calretinin immunoreactive interneurons die in early adulthood, leading to reduced GABA-mediated inhibition and generalized seizures. On the other hand, a less appreciated role for glial cells, redistribution of extracellular potassium ions and aquaporin water channels in seizure modification was demonstrated in a recent paper by Binder et al. [14]. Using aquaporin-4 null mice they found that stimulation-evoked seizure discharge was dramatically prolonged in these animals.

Seizure susceptibility and drug screening in fruit flies

Invertebrate model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies) have played a central role in the discovery of ion channel mutations resulting in epileptic phenotypes. These channelopathy mutants include temperature-sensitive paralytic seizure (hERG), slowpoke (BK), and Shaker (Kv1) or ether-induced leg shaking ether-a-go-go (hERG) flies [1517]. A larger class of bang-sensitive mutant progresses through distinct behavioral stages (muscle spasms and violent uncoordinated shaking, paralysis marked by lack of motion and responsiveness, delayed spasm and recovery) commonly interpreted as a seizure phenotype [18]. More importantly, physiological correlates of these behavioral stages can be monitored in recordings from the dorsal longitudinal flight motor neuron (DLM). In tethered flies, an electroconvulsive stimulus applied to the brain elicits an initial discharge of spikes, response failure, delayed discharge and recovery [18,19]. Interestingly, the electrical discharge pattern observed in flies resembles that described in kindling or afterdischarge stimulation protocols commonly used in rodents [20,21]. Given the similarities between Drosophila seizure phenotypes and epilepsy, it was only a matter of time before laboratories would begin using fruit flies in anticonvulsant drug screening strategies. In the first example, the bang-sensitive mutant easily shocked2 (ethanolamine kinase gene) was fed different concentrations of five conventional antiepileptic drugs. In a behavioral recovery paradigm, Reynolds and coworkers [22] identified phenytoin (dilantin) and gabapentin as effective anticonvulsant drugs. Carbamazepine, vigabatrin and ethosuximide were unable to ameliorate recovery in bang-sensitive mutants. In a second study, multiple compounds were tested in chemical convulsant Drosophila seizure models e.g., exposure to GABAA antagonists picrotoxin or pentylenetetrazole [23]. Phenytoin was again identified as a potential anticonvulsant in Drosophila, although this compound is not particularly useful in rodent picrotoxin/pentylenetetrazole models [24,25]. Using a para mutant, the authors also showed that the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin requires a sodium channel α subunit. These studies suggest that Drosophila and the variety of readily available Drosophila P-insertion mutants [26], though logistically favoring high-throughput drug screening, may be best suited to identifying molecular sites of action for available antiepileptic drugs or seizure susceptibility genes (see below).

Although single gene mutations resulting in epileptic phenotypes were identified, these disorders are rare, and it is commonly accepted that multiple factors are at play in this disease [27]. Identification of gene interactions that exacerbate epileptic phenotypes is needed, and seminal work by Mark Tanouye and coworkers using Drosophila is already focused on this question. Generating double mutants in a bang-sensitive background, they recently identified several genetic modifiers of seizure activity [28,29]. While a behavioral paralysis protocol is described in these and related studies, the sensitivity and potential for quantification associated with their electrophysiological assay is more appealing to an epilepsy audience. The basic protocol is to measure the minimal voltage applied to the fly brain necessary to elicit a pattern of aberrant high-frequency neuronal firing followed by refractory (postictal) inactivity. This approach initially identified seizure susceptibility mutations in ethanolamine kinase, mitochondrial ribosomal protein, Shaker potassium channels and sodium channel genes [30]. Not unlike early mouse knockout studies and the widespread belief that epilepsy is an excitation–inhibition imbalance, identified genes play critical roles in the regulation of neuronal excitability. More recently, additional potassium and sodium channel mutants were described by Lee and Wu [19] and a potassium/chloride co-transporter mutant by Hekmat-Scafe and coworkers [31]. The latter finding, a fly homolog of KCC2, is of particular interest as co-transporter maintenance of intracellular chloride levels is critical to the depolarizing and hyperpolarizing functions of GABAergic interneurons [32]; antagonizing these co-transporters exerts antiepileptic effects in vitro and in vivo [33,34]. On the other hand, a caveat of this Drosophila approach is that phenotypes may be uncovered that are not necessarily epileptic. For example, the couch potato (cpo) mutant crossed into a bang-sensitive background exhibits an electrical phenotype similar to previously described seizure susceptible mutants, e.g. seizure stimulus thresholds less than half of wild type flies. These mutants also exhibit a synaptic transmission defect and the novel couch potato gene described, cpoEG1, is linked to human neurodegenerative disorder spinocerebellar ataxia type I (SCA-1); ethanolamine kinase activity (e.g., bang-sensitive mutant used in seizure susceptibility studies) has also been linked to SCA-1 [35]. Whether ataxia or other neurological disorders accompanied by abnormal electrical discharge can be separated from epileptic phenotypes in Drosophila remains to be explored further.

Convulsions in a nematode model of lissencephaly

Lissencephaly is a rare childhood birth defect associated with schizophrenia, mental retardation and intractable epilepsy [36]. Although the ‘smooth brain’ pathology normally associated with lissencephaly-1 (LIS1) gene mutations cannot be reproduced in Caenorhabditis elegans, the genetic tractability of this organism offers a unique opportunity to study LIS1 gene function. Nematodes (C. elegans) are transparent and have a well characterized nervous system consisting of precisely 302 neurons [37]. Homologs for a wide variety of proteins required for mammalian neurological function (e.g., ion channels, receptors, and neurotransmitters) are conserved in C. elegans [38]. Elegant electrophysiological techniques developed by Erik Jorgensen and colleagues to study individual neurons in nematodes [39] make this organism attractive to a field studying abnormal electrical discharge. Automated systems for recording and analyzing simple behaviors in C. elegans have also been established [40]. Given these possibilities, it was not surprising to see reports of LIS1 gene function in C. elegans.

Initial studies of C. elegans lis-1 gene expression focused on the localization to proliferating cells and neurons; developmental studies have shown that LIS1 proteins play critical roles in nuclear positioning, cell proliferation and chromosome segregation [41,42]. Two recent manuscripts from Guy Caldwell’s laboratory offer a more seizure-directed focus to these Lis-1 nematode studies. Using pnm-1 (a nonsense allele of lis-1) homozygous animals that escape the early developmental lethality associated with LIS1 inactivation, digital video imaging experiments described ‘head-bobbing’ convulsions in pnm-1 worms exposed to the common convulsant pentylenetetrazole. Although the simple neuronal architecture of pnm-1 worms was not disrupted, irregularly sized and unevenly spaced puncta were observed [43]. These anatomical observations were interpreted as a defect in presynaptic vesicle transport within GABA-containing neurons and highlight an important advantage of this reductionist approach, namely, identification of LIS1 defects in synaptic structure that may be independent of neuronal migration deficits. To further demonstrate that LIS1-mediated nematode convulsions could be uncoupled from gross anatomical changes in brain structure, and were instead linked to intrinsic defects in synaptic vesicle transport, a second LIS1 worm manuscript was published in 2006 [44]. In this follow-up, RNA interference was used to inactivate several established LIS-1 pathway components and resulting mutants were then challenged with pentylenetetrazole. Worms depleted for NUD-1, NUD-2, DHC-1, CDK-5 and CDK-1 exhibited convulsive behaviors similar to pentylenetetrazole-exposed LIS1 mutants.

These studies provide an elegant example of how a simple organism can be exploited to uncover genetic modifiers of excitability (and ultimately epilepsy). Although pentylenetetrazole induced head-bobbing convulsions in C. elegans remain to be fully characterized as a seizure phenotype (specifically in terms of abnormal electrical discharge), these models may provide new insights to the fundamental mechanisms underlying convulsive behaviors.

Seizures in immature zebrafish

Although Danio rerio (zebrafish) are best known as a model organism to study development and vision, there is emerging interest in using these simple vertebrates in disease-based research [45,46]. Zebrafish offer a unique combination of genetic tractability, close homology with higher vertebrates and accessible experimental methodologies such as optical imaging, behavioral analysis, and electrophysiological recording. Given these possibilities, it was not a tremendous leap of logic when our laboratory decided to develop a zebrafish seizure model [47]. Using information accumulated from nearly a century of rodent seizure models, we exposed developing zebrafish larvae (6–7 days postfertilization) to various concentrations of pentylenetetrazole. Freely swimming zebrafish exposed to pentylenetetrazole in the bathing medium progressed from increased activity to rapid clonus-like full body convulsions followed by a brief loss of posture. Expression of an immediate early gene (c-Fos) upregulated in the CNS of many different rodent seizure models was also shown to be upregulated in the CNS of pentylenetetrazole-exposed zebrafish. More importantly, pentylenetetrazole exposure elicited brief small amplitude, high frequency (‘interictal-like’) and complex multispike, large amplitude (‘ictal-like’) electrographic discharge that could be monitored using a field electrode placed in the zebrafish telencephalon or optic tectum. Pentylenetetrazole-evoked electrical discharges were similar in waveform to those reported in mice or rats injected with this drug [48], and were abolished by valproic acid and benzodiazepines in a concentration-dependent manner.

Although establishment and characterization of seizures in zebrafish is currently limited to an acute model, this organism offers several interesting possibilities for future studies. For example, zebrafish forward-genetic mutagenesis screens have uncovered many genes responsible for critical aspects of neurodevelopment and it is not difficult to imagine using this approach to identify new seizure susceptibility genes. Application of morpholino oligonucleotide gene knockdown (a rapid method to analyze gene function in developing larvae) [49] or transposon-mediated gene trapping (a simple means to create chromosomal insertions) [50] approaches offer more examples of how targeted gene inactivation schemes, perhaps guided by human gene mutations shown to cause epilepsy, could be exploited for the generation of novel zebrafish epilepsy models.

Conclusion

A considerable level of effort is devoted to debating and discussing animal models of epilepsy. As with many such debates, consensus on which models best reflect the human condition is difficult to achieve. Where emerging models may benefit the epilepsy field is in pushing our perspective toward novel genetic, cellular and anatomical hypotheses. If one follows the latter philosophy, then a more appropriate question in evaluating emerging animal models is ‘will this model answer a specific epilepsy question?’ and not ‘how closely does the model mimic the human condition?’

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Michael Taylor and Dorothy Jones-Davis for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This commentary was also influenced and inspired by discussions at NIH Workshops and the American Epilepsy Society meeting led by Drs Schwartzkroin and Moshé. This work was supported by US Public Health Service Grants (R21 NS42328, R01 NS40272 and R01 NS048528).

Abbreviation

CNS

central nervous system

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (pp. 224–225).

  • 1.Purpura DP, Penry JK, Tower DB, et al. Experimental models of epilepsy: A manual for the laboratory worker. Raven Press; New York: 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 2 •.Pitkänen A, Schwartzkroin PA, Moshé SL. Models of seizures and epilepsy. Elsevier Academic Press; Boston: 2006. This thoughtful and well organized textbook features updates on widely used rat kindling models, in-vitro seizure preparations, and newer genetic models.
  • 3.Cortez MA, Perez Velazquez JL, Snead OC., 3rd Animal models of epilepsy and progressive effects of seizures. Adv Neurol. 2006;97:293–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seyfried TN, Glaser GH. A review of mouse mutants as genetic models of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1985;26:143–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1985.tb05398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Loscher W. Animal models of epilepsy for the development of antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying drugs. A comparison of the pharmacology of kindling and poststatus epilepticus models of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2002;50:105–123. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6 ••.Brenner R, Chen QH, Vilaythong A, et al. BK channel β4 subunit reduces dentate gyrus excitability and protects against temporal lobe seizures. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1752–1759. doi: 10.1038/nn1573. The authors showed that a β4 subunit represses the role played by BK channel activation in action potential repolarization. Surprisingly, conversion to a fast-gated BK channel in β4 null neurons reduced spike frequency adaptation, increasing firing rate and seizures.
  • 7.Yu FH, Mantegazza M, Westenbroek RE, et al. Reduced sodium current in GABAergic interneurons in a mouse model of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1142–1149. doi: 10.1038/nn1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang D, Pascual JM, Yang H, et al. A mouse model for Glut-1 haploinsufficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1169–1179. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fonck C, Cohen BN, Nashmi R, et al. Novel seizure phenotype and sleep disruptions in knock-in mice with hypersensitive α4* nicotinic receptors. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11396–11411. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3597-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schauwecker PE, Steward O. Genetic determinants of susceptibility to excitotoxic cell death: implications for gene targeting approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:4103–4108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.4103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kearney JA, Yang Y, Beyer B, et al. Severe epilepsy resulting from genetic interaction between Scn2a and Kcnq2. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1043–1048. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12 •.Frankel WN, Beyer B, Maxwell CR, et al. Development of a new genetic model for absence epilepsy: spike-wave seizures in C3H/He and backcross mice. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3452–3458. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0231-05.2005. This paper demonstrates that mouse substrains and crosses involving C3H/He have a high incidence of spike-wave discharges, thus suggesting new models for absence epilepsy.
  • 13.Cobos I, Calcagnotto ME, Vilaythong AJ, et al. Mice lacking Dlx1 show subtype-specific loss of interneurons, reduced inhibition and epilepsy. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1059–1068. doi: 10.1038/nn1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Binder DK, Yao X, Zador Z, et al. Increased seizure duration and slowed potassium kinetics in mice lacking aquaporin-4 water channels. Glia. 2006;53:631–636. doi: 10.1002/glia.20318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ganetzky B. Genetic analysis of ion channel dysfunction in Drosophila. Kidney Int. 2000;57:766–771. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Titus SA, Warmke JW, Ganetzky B. The Drosophila erg K+ channel polypeptide is encoded by the seizure locus. J Neurosci. 1997;17:875–881. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-03-00875.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ganetzky B, Wu CF. Neurogenetics of membrane excitability in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:13–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.000305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee J, Wu CF. Electroconvulsive seizure behavior in Drosophila: analysis of the physiological repertoire underlying a stereotyped action pattern in bang-sensitive mutants. J Neurosci. 2002;22:11065–11079. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-24-11065.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee J, Wu CF. Genetic modifications of seizure susceptibility and expression by altered excitability in Drosophila Na+ and K+ channel mutants. J Neuro physiol. 2006;96:2465–2478. doi: 10.1152/jn.00499.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pinel JPJ, Rovner LI. Experimental epileptogenesis: kindling-induced epilepsy in rats. Exp Neurol. 1978;58:190–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Racine RJ. Modification of seizure activity by electrical brain stimulation. I. Afterdischarge threshold. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972;32:269–280. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90176-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reynolds ER, Stauffer EA, Feeney L, et al. Treatment with the antiepileptic drugs phenytoin and gabapentin ameliorates seizure and paralysis of Drosophila bang-sensitive mutants. J Neurobiol. 2004;58:503–513. doi: 10.1002/neu.10297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23 •.Stilwell GE, Saraswati S, Littleton JT, et al. Development of a Drosophila seizure model for in vivo high-throughput drug screening. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:2211–2222. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05075.x. An important manuscript detailing simple methodologies to screen compounds for anticonvulsive potential in flies. Twenty-two compounds were screened in a picrotoxin protection assay.
  • 24.Krall RL, Penry JK, White BG, et al. Antiepileptic drug development. II: Anticonvulsant drug screening. Epilepsia. 1978;19:393–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1978.tb04506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shandra AA, Mazarati AM, Godlevsky LS, et al. Chemical kindling: implications for antiepileptic drugs – sensitive and resistant epilepsy models. Epilepsia. 1996;37:269–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spradling AC, Stern DM, Kiss I, et al. Gene disruptions using P transposable elements: an integral component of the Drosophila genome project. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:10824–10830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Noebels JL. The biology of epilepsy genes. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:599–625. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kuebler D, Tanouye MA. Modifications of seizure susceptibility in Drosophila. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:998–1009. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuebler D, Zhang H, Ren X, et al. Genetic suppression of seizure susceptibility in Drosophila. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:1211–1225. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pavlidis P, Tanouye MA. Seizures and failures in the giant fiber pathway of Drosophila bang-sensitive paralytic mutants. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5810–5819. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-08-05810.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31 •.Hekmat-Scafe DS, Lundy MY, Ranga R, et al. Mutations in the K+/Cl− cotransporter gene kazachoc (kcc) increases seizure susceptibility in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8943–8954. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4998-05.2006. This presents an interesting observation that links observations made in flies with reported roles for these co-transporters in rodents.
  • 32.Rivera C, Voipio J, Kaila K. Two developmental switches in GABAergic signalling: the K+-Cl− cotransporter KCC2 and carbonic anhydrase CAVII. J Physiol. 2005;562:27–36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.077495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haglund MM, Hochman DW. Furosemide and mannitol suppression of epileptic activity in the human brain. J Neurophysiol. 2005;54:907–918. doi: 10.1152/jn.00944.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dzhala VI, Talos DM, Sdrulla DA, et al. NKCC1 transporter facilitates seizures in the developing brain. Nat Med. 2005;11:1205–1213. doi: 10.1038/nm1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ross BM, Eder K, Moszczynska A, et al. Abnormal activity of membrane phospholipid synthetic enzymes in the brain of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia and spinocerebellar atrophy type-1. Mov Disord. 2000;15:294–300. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200003)15:2<294::aid-mds1013>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kato M, Dobyns WB. Lissencephaly and the molecular basis of neuronal migration. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(Spec No 1):R89–R96. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sengupta P, Colbert HA, Kimmel BE, et al. The cellular and genetic basis of olfactory responses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;179:235–244. doi: 10.1002/9780470514511.ch15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bargmann CI. Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Science. 1998;282:2028–2033. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weimer RM, Richmond JE, Davis WS, et al. Defects in synaptic vesicle docking in unc-18 mutants. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1023–1030. doi: 10.1038/nn1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cronin CJ, Feng Z, Schafer WR. Automated imaging of C. elegans behavior. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;351:241–251. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-151-7:241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dawe AL, Caldwell KA, Harris PM, et al. Evolutionarily conserved nuclear migration genes required for early embryonic development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Genes Evol. 2001;211:434–441. doi: 10.1007/s004270100176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cockell MM, Baumer K, Gonczy P. lis-1 is required for dynein-dependent cell division processes in C. elegans embryos. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4571–4582. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Williams SN, Locke CJ, Braden AL, et al. Epileptic-like convulsions associated with LIS-1 in the cytoskeletal control of neurotransmitter signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2043–2059. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Locke CJ, Williams SN, Schwarz EM, et al. Genetic interactions among cortical malformation genes that influence susceptibility to convulsions in C. elegans. Brain Res. 2006;1120:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Grabher C, Look AT. Fishing for cancer models. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:45–46. doi: 10.1038/nbt0106-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sadler KC, Amsterdam A, Soroka C, et al. A genetic screen in zebrafish identifies the mutants vps18, nf2 and foie gras as models of liver disease. Development. 2005;132:3561–3572. doi: 10.1242/dev.01918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baraban SC, Taylor MR, Castro PA, et al. Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-Fos expression. Neuroscience. 2005;131:759–768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Keogh BP, Cordes D, Stanberry L, et al. BOLD-fMRI of PTZ-induced seizures in rats. Epilepsy Res. 2005;66:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Corey DR, Abrams JM. Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides: tools for investigating vertebrate development. Genome Biol. 2001;2 doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-5-reviews1015. REVIEWS1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kawakami K. Transposon tools and methods in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2005;234:244–254. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES