Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2015 Apr;22(4):448–452. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000334

Presence of young children in the home may moderate development of hot flashes during menopausal transition

Tierney K Lorenz 1,2, Bonnie A McGregor 3, Virginia J Vitzthum 1,2,4,5
PMCID: PMC4362803  NIHMSID: NIHMS619293  PMID: 25225713

Abstract

Objective

To determine the role of childcare on hot flashes. There are broad differences across cultures in the experience of vasomotor symptoms in perimenopausal women. Women in cultures where contact with young children is common report significantly fewer and less severe hot flashes than women in cultures where older women spend less time around children. Could these differences be related to the presence of young children?

Methods

We surveyed 117 healthy women undergoing prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy (removal of both ovaries to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers). Participants provided demographic information, including pre-surgical menopausal status and number of children (aged < 13, 13 – 18, 18+ years) living at home. They were surveyed on menopausal symptoms 2 weeks prior to surgery, and then 2 months, 6 months, and one year following surgery.

Results

Women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery experienced a significant increase in vasomotor symptoms. Within this group, participants with young children at home reported significantly fewer vasomotor symptoms over time than women who did not live with young children. Women who were already menopausal at the time of surgery who had young children at home reported more vasomotor symptoms prior to surgery than did those without young children; however this effect did not remain significant across follow-ups.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that interactions with young children may mitigate hot flashes for women undergoing surgical menopause. These findings may be used to counsel women considering prophylactic oophorectomy about the likelihood of menopausal symptoms.

Keywords: hot flashes, surgical menopause, oophorectomy, parenting, psychosocial factors

Introduction

Several cross-cultural studies have reported differences in the experience of hot flashes during menopause. Women in Westernized, urban environments report the highest number and severity of hot flashes while women in Asian and African societies report far fewer hot flashes1. Within the United States, Euro-American women report more hot flashes than Asian-Americans2. A number of explanations for these differences have been offered including ecological factors (e.g., local climates3), biological factors (e.g., population differences in average body composition4), and cultural factors (e.g., differences in symptom reporting or perceptions of aging5).

Another intriguing hypothesis proposes that some social interactions may buffer against troublesome menopausal symptoms either directly, through influences on important neuroendocrine systems or indirectly, e.g., via improvements in anxiety6 or social support7. Several studies have examined the role of social interactions, particularly with long-term relationship partners8, 9, on menopausal women’s hot flashes; however, there is little known about the effect of another primary relationship – that of women to their children and grandchildren. Considering the potential interactions between parity and nurturance that may play a role in regulating hormones relevant to menopause, this lack of attention seems a critical gap.

Recognition of the potential importance of parent-offspring relations emerges from the growing literature on evolutionary medicine10. Evolutionary anthropology predicts that social structures that promote offspring survival will, over time, be strengthened. The existence of “grandmothering” across cultures, and likely throughout Homo sapiens’ evolutionary history, suggests there may be proximate benefits for interactions with young children. Specifically, those older women who interact with grandchildren may experience relief from menopausal symptoms (to the extent that our evolutionary ancestors experienced such symptoms), which in turn may promote and facilitate their care of these grandchildren, thereby increasing their long-term reproductive fitness. White women in Western societies tend to have less contact with young children during menopause than do African or Asian women11, further suggesting that hot flashes may be moderated by the presence of young children.

Does the presence of young children in the home predict hot flash development during menopause? Also, given that women who undergo oophorectomy (also termed “surgical menopause”) report the highest rates of hot flashes12, are there differential patterns across types of menopause? We examined these questions in a sample of women who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy. Of these, approximately half were perimenopausal or menopausal at the time of surgery – that is, had experienced a “natural” menopause – while the other half were premenopausal at the time of surgery – that is, experienced a “surgical menopause”. Tracking hot flash symptoms in these two groups allowed us to compare the effects of slow vs. rapid declines in ovarian hormones.

Methods

The present study was a secondary analysis of a previously collected dataset; full details can be found in McGregor, et al.13 and Lorenz, McGregor & Swisher 14. One hundred nineteen women who were planning a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy were recruited from gynecological clinics in Seattle. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the removal of both ovaries and fallopian tubes to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer; thus, although all women were at high risk of ovarian cancer due to family history or known mutation of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, they were (at the time of surgery) cancer-free and healthy. Interested participants were given a survey packet by their gynecologist 2 weeks prior to surgery (baseline), and instructed to mail the packet to the study coordinator. Follow-up survey packets were mailed to participants 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery; 72% of participants completed all packets (9 did not complete the 2-month packet; 23 did not complete the 6-month packet, and 33 did not complete the 12-month packet; all participants' data were included in analyses below). Participants’ data were identified by code number only and their physicians were not informed of their participation status. The study was approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center institutional review board. Two women were missing data on number of children (see below) and were dropped from the analyses (total sample = 117). Women who were menopausal or postmenopausal at baseline (N = 69, mean age = 52.14 years) were significantly older than women who were premenopausal at baseline (N = 48, mean age = 42.53 years, see Table 1), one-way ANOVA F(1, 116) = 58.57, p < 0.001, therefore, analyses were controlled for age.

Table 1.

Demographics and sample characteristics.

Premenopausal
prior to surgery
Menopausal or
postmenopausal prior to
surgery
Age M(SD) 52.21 (7.87) 42.53 (8.14)
% White 89% 91%
% married or in long term relationship 81% 75%
% At least one child < 13 44% 22%
% At least one child 13 – 18 32% 25%

% reporting at least some hot flashes/night sweats in the past month

  Prior to surgery 32% 64%
  2 months post-surgery 70% 58%
  6 months post-surgery 77% 55%
  1 year post-surgery 72% 55%

% reporting HRT use

  Prior to surgery 13% 4%
  2 months post-surgery 12% 45%
  6 months post-surgery 17% 51%
  1 year post-surgery 17% 41%

Participants provided demographic information including number of children under 13, 13–18, and 18+ years of age living at home. Of the women who were premenopausal at baseline, 20 had no children and 28 reported at least one child; of the women who were menopausal or postmenopausal at baseline, 40 reported no children and 29 reported at least one child.

We measured hot flash/night sweat symptoms at each time point with a modified version of the Vasomotor subscale of the Menopausal Symptoms Scale 15, a validated index of the most commonly experienced menopausal symptoms 15, 16. Each symptom (“hot flash”, “night sweats”) was rated on frequency within the last month on a five-point Likert response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Our modified version did not include “interrupted sleep” because in factor analyses this item loaded poorly with the other two items in our sample of premenopausal women prior to surgery (and instead loaded with insomnia/anxiety items). This contrasts with previous factor analyses in breast cancer survivors, in which “interrupted sleep” loaded strongly with other hot flash items16, further highlighting the difference in hot flash experience in “natural” vs. “surgically” menopausal women.

Finally, as anxiety is often cited as a trigger for hot flashes6, and thus a potential moderator, we measured anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory17, a widely used, well validated instrument. In analyses below, we used the Trait subscale, which is thought to reflect stable, clinically relevant anxiety as opposed to transient changes in mood.

We conducted a repeated measures mixed generalized linear model with vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes/night sweats) as the dependent variable, the presence of children and pre-surgery menopausal status (premenopausal vs. menopausal or postmenopausal), as well as their interaction, as independent variables, and assessment session as the repeated subjects variable. We controlled for age and use of hormone treatments, and included a subject-level random intercept. For analyses of anxiety as moderator, we repeated these analyses including the interaction of anxiety with independent variables. The generalized linear model is robust to missing data and thus we were able to use data from all participants including those who dropped out.

Results

The interaction between pre-surgery menopausal status and young children (<13 years old) was significant in predicting change in vasomotor symptoms across time (F(3, 111.32) = 9.84, p = 0.002). Women who were premenopausal prior to surgery experienced an increase in vasomotor symptoms 2 months following surgery that persisted through the 12-month follow-up (Figure 1). Within the group of women who were premenopausal prior to surgery, women who had young children reported fewer vasomotor symptoms at all time points after surgery than those who did not have young children, although this effect was marginally significant (contrast estimate = 0.53, t(81.19) = 1.89, p = 0.06).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Vasomotor symptoms pre- and post-surgery in 117 women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Note: Stars indicate significant group-level contrasts; dagger indicates significant change between time points.

Women who were menopausal or postmenopausal prior to surgery (with or without young children) reported no significant change in vasomotor symptoms over time (contrast estimate = −0.47, t(51.29) = –1.46, p = 0.15). For this group, having young children at home was associated with more vasomotor symptoms prior to surgery, and 2 months post-surgery (t(26.12) = –2.02, p = 0.05, and t(14.98) = –2.37, p = 0.02, respectively), but not at 6 or 12 months post-surgery (t(20.06) = –1.04, p = 0.31, and t(13.77) = –0.60, p = 0.56, respectively). In other words, for women who were post-menopausal, having young children at home was associated with more vasomotor symptoms, but this effect was not significant across time (see Figure 1).

Neither the main effect of older children ( >13 years old) nor the interaction of pre-menopausal status and older children was significant in predicting change in vasomotor symptoms across time (F(3, 153.88) = 0.72, p = 0.54, and F(3, 152.99) = 0.95, p = 0.42, respectively). Finally, the interaction of young children, premenopausal status, and anxiety was marginally significant at p = 0.07 (F(3, 259.38) = 3.41). Although not a strong effect, anxiety appeared to increase vasomotor symptoms in women without young children at home, particularly if they were pre-menopausal at the time of surgery.

Discussion

In our sample, having young children appeared to protect against hot flash and night sweat symptoms during the menopausal transition in women undergoing surgical menopause, but not for women who reported undergoing natural menopause prior to surgery. The fact that effects observed were limited to only women with children age <13 years suggests that parity was not sufficient to produce changes in hot flashes, and points instead to the increased nurturance needs of young children.

One possible mechanism for these effects is oxytocin, a hormone that coordinates maternal behaviors such as lactation and is released in response to nurturing care18. Oxytocin has thermoregulatory effects and can induce either increases or decreases of core temperature depending on the context19. Immediately postpartum, oxytocin has a hypothermic effect that prevents onset of fever20. However, when caring for young, oxytocin may have a hyperthermic effect, promoting heat transfer to offspring21. Mothers who bind their infants to their breasts to promote heat transfer express significantly more oxytocin than mothers who touch their infants at a similar rate but do not engage in incubation behaviors22.

Most relevant to the present study, in the presence of moderate to low levels of estrogens, oxytocin appears to have hyperthermic effects23, 24 but when responding to dramatic decreases in circulating estrogen (such as immediately post-partum, or after removal of the ovaries), oxytocin may have a hypothermic effect25, 26. This could explain why in our sample, the presence of young children had a different effect on women who underwent surgical menopause vs. natural menopause. Finally, oxytocin is also a powerful anxiolytic18. While our findings regarding anxiety were only suggestive, the trend in these data supported the hypothesis that in the presence of young children, anxiety may be a relatively less potent hot flash trigger.

We lacked the hormonal measures to directly test if oxytocin mediated the effect of children on hot flashes in our sample; however, our findings support further study of the role of oxytocin in menopausal symptoms. To date, the only data published on oxytocin as a treatment for menopausal symptoms are two patents documenting benefits of oxytocin agonists on hot flashes in small trials in ovariectomised rats (an analog for surgically menopausal women)27, 28. It should be noted that the majority of studies examining oxytocin release in response to nurturance have been conducted in parent-infant dyads29 or parent-toddler dyads30 and thus the role of oxytocin in the care of older children is largely unknown.

Other potential mechanisms for these effects include differences between parents and non-parents in rates of physical activity31, diet32, use of alcohol or tobacco33, or stress. Notably, employed women with a child at home secrete significantly more cortisol than women without children34. Long term exposure to cortisol can dull sympathetic nervous system reactivity35; as sympathetic inputs are the proximate trigger to vasodilation (sweating and flushing)36, it is possible that women with children are only responsive to very high levels of sympathetic activity, leading to fewer hot flashes.

Limitations to the current study include lack of generalizability across races/ethnicities (due to the small sample of non-white women) and to women without high risk for cancer. Of note there may be some significant differences between the nature of the anxiety experienced pre- and post-surgery for this group of women with high cancer risk13. There was also limited specificity about the degree of contact with children (beyond presence/absence). Another limitation is lack of information about time since last menstrual period among the group who reported being “menopausal” at baseline. Strengths include a prospective design and long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

These data support the hypothesis that interactions with young children may influence development of hot flashes in menopausal women. Future work will be necessary to examine potential mechanisms of these effects, such as oxytocin-mediated thermoregulation. The present findings support consideration of the influence of evolution in developing behavioral management strategies for menopausal symptoms.

Acknowledgements

This data was collected with support from NIH Cancer Center Support Grant 5P30 CA015704-31. Tierney Lorenz is supported by grant T32HD049336-09 from the NICHD. The contents of this manuscript are the original work of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors wish to thank Alison Walensky for her assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Contributor Information

Bonnie A. McGregor, Email: bmcgrego@fhcrc.org.

Virginia J. Vitzthum, Email: vitzthum@indiana.edu.

References

  • 1.Freeman EW, Sherif K. Prevalence of hot flushes and night sweats around the world: a systematic review. Climacteric. 2007;10(3):197–214. doi: 10.1080/13697130601181486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, et al. Is there a menopausal syndrome? Menopausal status and symptoms across racial/ethnic groups. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(3):345–356. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sievert LL, Flanagan EK. Geographical distribution of hot flash frequencies: considering climatic influences. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128(2):437–443. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gold EB, Sternfeld B, Kelsey JL, et al. Relation of demographic and lifestyle factors to symptoms in a multi-racial/ethnic population of women 40–55 years of age. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(5):463–473. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.5.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kowalcek I, Rotte D, Banz C, Diedrich K. Women's attitude and perceptions towards menopause in different cultures: Cross-cultural and intra-cultural comparison of pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women in Germany and in Papua New Guinea. Maturitas. 2005;51(3):227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR, Kapoor S, Ferdousi T. The role of anxiety and hormonal changes in menopausal hot flashes. Menopause. 2005;12(3):258–266. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000142440.49698.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keefer L, Blanchard E. A Behavioral Group Treatment Program for Menopausal Hot Flashes: Results of a Pilot Study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30(1):21–30. doi: 10.1007/s10484-005-2171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McCoy N, Cutler W, Davidson JM. Relationships among sexual behavior, hot flashes, and hormone levels in perimenopausal women. Arch Sex Behav. 1985;14(5):385–394. doi: 10.1007/BF01542000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duché L, Ringa V, Melchior M, et al. Hot flushes, common symptoms, and social relations among middle-aged nonmenopausal French women in the GAZEL cohort. Menopause. 2006;13(4):592–599. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000227329.41458.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elton S, O'Higgens P, editors. Medicine and Evolution: Current Applications, Future Prospects. London: CRC Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goodman CC, Silverstein M. Grandmothers Raising Grandchildren: Ethnic and Racial Differences in Well-Being Among Custodial and Coparenting Families. Journal of Family Issues. 2006;27(11):1605–1626. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Feldman BM, Voda A, Gronseth E. The prevalence of hot flash and associated variables among perimenopausal women. Res Nurs Health. 1985;8(3):261–268. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770080308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McGregor B, Charbonneau AM, Ceballos R, et al. "But how will I feel afterwards?" Predictors of change in quality of life from before to after risk reducing salpingo oophorectomy among women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. under review. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lorenz T, McGregor B, Swisher E. Relationship satisfaction predicts sexual activity following risk reducing salpingo oophorectomy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2014.899577. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ganz PA, Day R, Ware JE, Redmond C, Fisher B. Base-line quality-of-life assessment in the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project breast cancer prevention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(18):1372–1382. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.18.1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alfano CM, McGregor BA, Kuniyuki A, et al. Psychometric properties of a tool for measuring hormone-related symptoms in breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2006;15(11):985–1000. doi: 10.1002/pon.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carter CS. Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:17–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Argiolas A, Gessa GL. Central functions of oxytocin. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991;15(2):217–231. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poulin PE, Pittman QJ. Possible involvement of brain oxytocin in modulating vasopressin antipyretic action. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 1993;265(1):R151–R156. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.1.R151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kojima S, Stewart RA, Demas GE, Alberts JR. Maternal Contact Differentially Modulates Central and Peripheral Oxytocin in Rat Pups During a Brief Regime of Mother–Pup Interaction that Induces a Filial Huddling Preference. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24(5):831–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02280.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feldman R, Gordon I, Schneiderman I, Weisman O, Zagoory-Sharon O. Natural variations in maternal and paternal care are associated with systematic changes in oxytocin following parent–infant contact. Psychoneuroendocrino. 2010;35(8):1133–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mason GA, Caldwell JD, Stanley DA, Hatley OL, Prange AJ, Jr, Pedersen CA. Interactive effects of intracisternal oxytocin and other centrally active substances on colonic temperatures of mice. Regul Pept. 1986;14(3):253–260. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(86)90008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin M, Ho L, Chan H. Effects of oxytocin and (1-penicillamine, 4-threonine) oxytocin on thermoregulation in rats. Neuropharmacology. 1983;22(8):1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(83)90217-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meisenberg G, Simmons W. Hypothermia induced by centrally administered vasopressin in rats: a structure-activity study. Neuropharmacology. 1984;23(10):1195–1200. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(84)90239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fahrbach S, Morrell J, Pfaff D. Oxytocin induction of short-latency maternal behavior in nulliparous, estrogen-primed female rats. Horm Behav. 1984;18(3):267–286. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(84)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Uvnäs-Moberg K, Lundeberg T. Use of substances with oxytocin activity against climacteric disorders. Google Patents. 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leventhal L, Ring R. Methods of treating vasomotor symptoms. Google Patents. 2005 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Galbally M, Lewis AJ, IJzendoorn Mv, Permezel M. The role of oxytocin in mother-infant relations: a systematic review of human studies. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19(1):1–14. doi: 10.3109/10673229.2011.549771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. Oxytocin receptor (OXTR) and serotonin transporter (5-HTT) genes associated with observed parenting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2008;3(2):128–134. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bellows-Riecken KH, Rhodes RE. A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Prev Med. 2008;46(2):99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nasuti G, Blanchard C, Naylor P-J, et al. Comparison of the Dietary Intakes of New Parents, Second-Time Parents, and Nonparents: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014;114(3):450–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Merline AC, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Bachman JG, Johnston LD. Substance Use Among Adults 35 Years of Age: Prevalence, Adulthood Predictors, and Impact of Adolescent Substance Use. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(1):96–102. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luecken LJ, Suarez EC, Kuhn CM, et al. Stress in employed women: impact of marital status and children at home on neurohormone output and home strain. Psychosom Med. 1997;59(4):352–359. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199707000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McEwen BS. Protection and Damage from Acute and Chronic Stress: Allostasis and Allostatic Overload and Relevance to the Pathophysiology of Psychiatric Disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1032(1):1–7. doi: 10.1196/annals.1314.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Charkoudian N. Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: how it works, when it does not why. Mayo Clin Proc: Elsevier. 2003:603–612. doi: 10.4065/78.5.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES