Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 17;14(12):1176–1177. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71005-9

Antiretroviral treatment initiation—authors’ reply

Seonaid Nolan 1,2, Evan Wood 1,2, Julio S G Montaner 1,2
PMCID: PMC4364602  NIHMSID: NIHMS670039  PMID: 25455978

We thank Arild Maeland and Samir Gupta for their interest in our Comment.1 Traditionally, concerns about cost, sustainability, and potential toxicities of long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) have led to recommendations to defer ART initiation. The development, however, of more efficacious, convenient, and better-tolerated ART regimens has markedly reversed this trend. Furthermore, results from the HPTN 052 substudy show a range of individual benefits of early ART initiation, including a significant reduction in AIDS-related opportunistic infections and tuberculosis incidence.2

Not surprisingly, the strongest clinical evidence of a major short-term survival benefit with ART occurs in patients who initiate therapy with a CD4 cell count of 350 cells per μL or less. It should be emphasised, however, that non-AIDS related morbidity and mortality are emerging concerns best addressed by suppressing HIV replication with the safest ART regimen appropriate for each patient, as shown by results from the SMART trial.3

Although clinical trials are underway to specifically assess the effect of earlier ART initiation in asymptomatic individuals infected with HIV with normal CD4 cell counts, existing cohort studies—the NA ACCORD and ART-CC—have both reported reduced morbidity and mortality with earlier ART initiation.4, 5 Additionally, no study in the modern ART era has clearly shown better clinical outcomes with treatment deferral. The potential outcomes of untreated HIV should also be acknowledged, and thus a discussion of the effect of immediate versus deferred ART should identify not only morbidity and mortality issues, but also other key outcomes including quality of life, productivity, HIV transmission, feasibility, and economic issues, to name a few.

Recently, a global confluence of ART guidelines has occurred, which is highlighted by the latest release of the 2013 WHO HIV treatment guidelines, with the overall consensus being that ART should be offered to most if not all individuals infected with HIV.6 Additionally the UN has formally proposed a new post-2015 ART target, the 90-90-90 target: by 2020 at least 90% of all people living with HIV will know their HIV status, at least 90% of those will receive sustained ART, and at least 90% will have durable viral suppression. We support these new declarations and believe it is high time to mobilise the necessary resources to fulfil the promise of HIV treatment as prevention: prevention of morbidity, prevention of premature mortality, and secondarily prevention of HIV transmission, at a global level.

Acknowledgements

SN and EW have received research funding from the Canada Research Chairs programme through a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine (to EW) and from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant number R01-DA021525). JSGM has received grants from British Columbia Ministry of Health, and US National Institute of Health (R01DA036307), and limited unrestricted funding paid to his institution from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare.

References

  • 1.Nolan S, Wood E. End of the debate about antiretroviral treatment initiation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:258–259. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70329-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Effects of early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infection: results from the phase 3 HPTN 052 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:281–290. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70692-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving ART at baseline in the SMART study. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1133–1144. doi: 10.1086/586713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kitahata MM, Gange SJ, Abraham AG, et al. Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1815–1826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sterne JAC, May M, Costagliola D, et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: a collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1352–1363. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60612-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.WHO . Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2013. p. 272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES