Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 30;61(3):965–978. doi: 10.1002/hep.27593

Table 1.

C/EBPα Independently Predicted Poorer Overall Survival in Primary HCC Patients

Molecular and Clinical Variables Number of Cases Hazard Ratio(95% Confidence Interval) P Value
Univariate analysis (Cox: enter)
C/EBPα (no change vs. up-regulation) 42/137  3.690 (1.131-12.038) 0.030
Serum AFP (<300 vs. ≥300 ng/mL) 114/48 3.637 (1.866-7.013)  0.0002
Age (<50 vs. ≥50) 47/135 0.739 (0.371-1.472) 0.390
Gender (male vs. female) 150/37 0.456 (0.232-0.897) 0.023
Diabetes (no vs. yes) 133/47 0.504 (0.210-1.213) 0.126
HBV (no vs. yes) 60/117 1.062 (0.522-2.159) 0.868
HCV (no vs. yes) 167/12 0.494 (0.068-3.603) 0.486
Cirrhosis (no vs. yes) 87/100 1.056 (0.553-2.015) 0.868
Tumor size (<5 vs. ≥5 cm) 89/95 2.581 (1.263-5.275) 0.009
Number of nodules (single vs. multiple) 129/58 0.619 (0.314-1.222) 0.167
TNM staging (I vs. II, III, and IV) 87/91 2.952 (1.477-5.897) 0.002
Microscopic lymphatic invasion (no vs. yes) 76/14 1.410 (0.312-6.373) 0.655
Microscopic vascular invasion (no vs. yes) 99/57  4.836 (2.252-10.386)  <0.0001
Steatosis (< 5% vs. ≥5%) 163/24 0.560 (0.172-1.825) 0.336
Fibrosis (no vs. yes) 151/36 0.874 (0.399-1.916) 0.874
Tumor encapsulation (no vs. yes) 40/68 0.576 (0.209-1.590) 0.287
Tumor necrosis (no vs. yes) 93/93 1.028 (0.539-1.961) 0.933
Multivariate analysis (Cox: forward LR)
C/EBPα (no change vs. up-regulation) 29/103  5.116 (1.188-22.026) 0.028
Serum AFP (≤300 vs. >300 ng/mL) 94/38 4.238 (1.958-9.170)  0.0002
Microscopic vascular invasion (no vs. yes) 82/50  5.577 (2.391-13.012)  <0.0001

Correlations of HCC patient overall survival with C/EBPα expression level and clinical factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. The factors significant in the univariate Cox model were included in the multivariate Cox model, and only three factors including C/EBPα were finally enrolled.

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.