Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1975 Aug;56(2):476–483. doi: 10.1172/JCI108114

Pressure tension, and force of closure of the human lower esophageal sphincter and esophagus.

P Biancani, M P Zabinski, J Behar
PMCID: PMC436608  PMID: 1097467

Abstract

The mechanical characteristics of the circular muscle of the human lower esophageal sphincter and esophagus were studied in subjects with competent and incompetent sphincters. Pressure-diameter curves were constructed by producing various degrees of circumferential stretch with pressure-measuring probes of increasing diameter. The circumferential membrane tension (force of closure) and the circumferential stress (muscle tension) of the circular muscle layer were also calculated from these data. The pressure-diameter curves of competent and incompetent sphincters were different in magnitude and shape. Incompetent sphincters had lower pressures at all diameters, with pressure gradually increasing with larger probe diameter. In contrast for competent sphincters the pressure was highest near closure, with an initial decline and then an increase in pressure with increasing probe diameter. Both shape and magnitude of pressure-diameter curves of competent and incompetent sphincters were interchangeable when manipulated by pharmacologic agents. Urecholine increased the pressures and changed the incompetent pressure-diameter curve to the levels of the competent sphincter; conversely. Pro-Banthine decreased pressures and changed the shape of the competent pressure-diameter curve to the levels of the incompetent sphincter. Force of closure and circular muscle tension curves of competent and incompetent sphincters were similar in shape but were higher at all diameters for competent sphincters. Force of closure and circular muscle tension increased with larger probe diameter. However, the diameter of optimal tension development was larger than the largest probe used and certainly far from closure. Fundoplication increased the magnitude and changed the shape of the incompetent pressure-diameter curve to one similar to a competent curve. This pressure change was associated with an increase in the force of closure, suggesting that fundopliation modified the length-force of closure characteristics of the incompetent spincter.

Full text

PDF
476

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNSTEIN L. M., BAKER L. A. A clinical test for esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1958 May;34(5):760–781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BURTON A. C. On the physical equilibrium of small blood vessels. Am J Physiol. 1951 Feb;164(2):319–329. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.164.2.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behar J., Biancani P., Spiro H. M., Storer E. H. Effect of an anterior fundoplication on lower esophageal sphincter competence. Gastroenterology. 1974 Aug;67(2):209–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biancani P., Goyal R. K., Phillips A., Spiro H. M. Mechanics of sphincter action. Studies on the lower esophageal sphincter. J Clin Invest. 1973 Dec;52(12):2973–2978. doi: 10.1172/JCI107494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen S., Harris L. D. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure as an index of lower esophageal sphincter strength. Gastroenterology. 1970 Feb;58(2):157–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haddad J. K. Relation of gastroesophageal reflux to yield sphincter pressures. Gastroenterology. 1970 Feb;58(2):175–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ismail-Beigi F., Horton P. F., Pope C. E., 2nd Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology. 1970 Feb;58(2):163–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LAWTON R. W. Variability of the viscoelastic constants along the aortic axis of the dog. Circ Res. 1960 Mar;8:381–389. doi: 10.1161/01.res.8.2.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. NAGLER R., SPIRO H. M. PERSISTENT GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX INDUCED DURING PROLONGED GASTRIC INTUBATION. N Engl J Med. 1963 Sep 5;269:495–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196309052691003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pope C. E., 2nd A dynamic test of sphincter strength: its application to the lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology. 1967 May;52(5):779–786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roling G. T., Farrell R. L., Castell D. O. Cholinergic response of the lower esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol. 1972 Apr;222(4):967–972. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.222.4.967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stephens N. L., Kroeger E., Mehta J. A. Force-velocity characteristics of respiratory airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1969 Jun;26(6):685–692. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.6.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Torrance B. Symposium on gastrooesophageal reflux and its complications. 6. Surgical treatment. Gut. 1973 Mar;14(3):249–253. doi: 10.1136/gut.14.3.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VINNIK I. E., KERN F., Jr THE EFFECT OF GASTRIC INTUBATION ON ESOPHAGEAL PH. Gastroenterology. 1964 Oct;47:388–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Winans C. S., Harris L. D. Quantitation of lower esophageal sphincter competence. Gastroenterology. 1967 May;52(5):773–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zabinski M. P., Spiro H. M., Biancani P. Influence of perfusion rate and compliance on esophageal manometry. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jan;38(1):177–180. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES