Skip to main content
Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ logoLink to Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ
. 2015 Mar;148(2):71–81. doi: 10.1177/1715163515569572

A pharmacist’s guide to the 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy

Margaret L Ackman 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,, Claudia Bucci 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Michael Callaghan 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Heather Kertland 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Chantal Pharand 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Patrick Robertson 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, William Semchuk 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
PMCID: PMC4366409  PMID: 25918539

The initial Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines on the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy1 covered chronic antiplatelet therapy for a number of diseases and patient subgroups. The 2012 Focused Update2 specifically addressed the issues of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in the first year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The updating of these topics and the prominence of the newer antiplatelet agents in the guidelines make them of particular relevance to pharmacists. The intent of this publication is to highlight components of the guidelines that are most likely to affect the practice of pharmacists and provide practical information to assist pharmacists in managing patients on antiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) continues to be the cornerstone of therapy for the continuum of ACS, from unstable angina to ST elevation myocardial infarction managed with either medications alone or a combination of medications and PCI (Table 1, Figure 1). The recommendation that all patients receive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81 mg daily indefinitely remains unchanged.2

Table 1.

Glossary

ACS Acute coronary syndrome is inclusive of both non-ST elevation ACS (NSTEACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
 NSTEACS Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome is inclusive of both non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina, which are differentiated by the lack of heart muscle damage associated with unstable angina
 STEMI ST elevation myocardial infarction is differentiated from NSTEACS by the severity of the ischemia and consequent damage to the heart
PCI Percutaneous coronary intervention
 Primary PCI Use of PCI as the initial reperfusion strategy for STEMI
 Elective PCI Use of PCI for management of narrowing of a coronary artery, in stable angina, not in the setting of ACS

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Acute coronary syndrome treatment.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; NSTEACS, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention

Non-ST elevation ACS

In addition to ASA, a second antiplatelet agent should be used in the management of non-ST elevation ACS (NSTEACS). In patients with moderate- to high-risk NSTEACS, the guidelines recommend ticagrelor. This is regardless of whether the patient has had PCI, CABG or no intervention. Ticagrelor is recommended over clopidogrel.2 Prasugrel is recommended over clopidogrel in NSTEACS patients undergoing PCI who were not previously treated with any of the P2Y12 inhibitors (i.e., clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor). The more limited recommendation for prasugrel reflects the study population and manner in which it was used in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, the key trial that led to its Health Canada approval.3 Due to a lack of trial comparisons, there are no recommendations for choosing between prasugrel and ticagrelor. For patients who are not eligible for ticagrelor or prasugrel, clopidogrel is recommended. Regardless of the second antiplatelet agent selected, DAPT should continue for 12 months in the setting of NSTEACS (Table 2).

Table 2.

Recommendations for dual-antiplatelet therapy2

Indication Antiplatelet therapy in combination with ASA 81 mg daily Suggested duration of therapy
NSTEACS patients managed with PCI, CABG or medical management Ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day over clopidogrel* 12 months*
P2Y12-naive NSTEACS patients for planned PCI Prasugrel 10 mg orally daily over clopidogrel* 12 months*
NSTEACS patients managed with PCI, CABG or medical management who are not eligible for prasugrel or ticagrelor Clopidogrel 75 mg daily* 12 months*
STEMI patients managed with either fibrinolysis or no reperfusion therapy Clopidogrel 75 mg daily* At least 1 month*
12 months
STEMI patients managed with primary PCI Prasugrel 10 mg daily or ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day over clopidogrel 12 months
Stable angina managed with PCI Clopidogrel 75 mg daily* 12 months*
*

Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence.

Conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence.

Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.

ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; NSTEACS, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction.

ST elevation myocardial infarction

Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) managed with either fibrinolytic therapy or no reperfusion therapy were excluded from the trials studying ticagrelor and prasugrel.3,4 For these patients, the second antiplatelet agent in addition to ASA should be clopidogrel, preferably for a period of 12 months, noting that the evidence for continuation of clopidogrel beyond 1 month is limited. However, for patients managed with primary PCI, either prasugrel or ticagrelor in addition to ASA is recommended over clopidogrel for 12 months2 (Table 2).

Antiplatelet therapy after PCI for a non-ACS indication

PCI for stable angina or non-ACS indication

A significant number of patients undergo elective PCI, not in the setting of ACS. The newer antiplatelet agents have not been studied in this setting, so clopidogrel with ASA is considered the combination of choice.1 Patient-specific issues, such as adverse drug reactions or drug interactions, could result in one of the newer antiplatelet agents being a more appropriate choice for an individual patient. However, under many provincial drug plans, prasugrel and ticagrelor are restricted to patients who have experienced ACS, so pharmacists may need to discuss drug benefit issues with their patients to ensure adherence to therapy.

Stent thrombosis

Stent thrombosis is an infrequent complication following PCI. For patients who have been compliant with clopidogrel and who have gone on to develop stent thrombosis, the guidelines recommend switching to either prasugrel or ticagrelor in combination with ASA, noting that the evidence is of low quality.2

Optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy

The guidelines2 broadly recommend 12 months of DAPT following ACS and also following PCI for non-ACS indications. However, there may be specific circumstances under which shorter durations of DAPT may be appropriate (Table 3). For example, the use of triple-antithrombotic therapy (dual antiplatelet and the use of an oral anticoagulant at a therapeutic dose) could be a situation where a practitioner may choose to use a shorter duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy.

Table 3.

Considerations for shorter duration of DAPT

Patient factors Stent factors
High risk of bleeding Bare metal stents require a minimum duration of 1 month of DAPT, which could be reduced to 2 weeks in patients at very high risk of bleeding
Need for major surgical procedure Drug-eluting stents require 12 months of DAPT, but newer generation drug-eluting stents may allow for shorter duration of DAPT, especially in the case of patients at high risk of bleeding

DAPT, dual-antiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelet agents

Three antiplatelet agents are referred to in the guidelines for use in combination with ASA. Pharmacists must be aware of the differences between the agents to manage adverse drug reactions, drug interactions and other considerations for individual patients. Various pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the agents are outlined in Table 4.

Table 4.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents5-7

Clopidogrel (Plavix) Prasugrel (Effient) Ticagrelor (Brilinta)
Mechanism of action Inhibits binding of adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) to platelet P2Y12 receptor and subsequent ADP-mediated platelet activation Inhibits binding of ADP to platelet P2Y12 receptor and subsequent ADP-mediated platelet activation Binds to the P2Y12 receptor site and inhibits ADP signaling and receptor conformational change
Maintenance dose 75 mg daily 10 mg daily 90 mg twice daily
Approved indications with concurrent low-dose ASA
  • MI, stroke, PAD (secondary prevention)

  • ACS ± PCI

  • Atrial fibrillation

ACS undergoing PCI ACS managed medically or with PCI or CABG
Onset of effect after loading dose 2-5 h 1-1.5 h 1-3 h
% Platelet inhibition at steady state 40%-60% 69%-74% 74%-96%
Duration of platelet inhibition 5-7 days irreversible binding 5-7 days irreversible binding 48-72 h reversible binding
Metabolism Prodrug (CYP2C19, 3A, 2B6, 1A2) Prodrug (CYP3A4, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19) Not a prodrug (CYP3A4)
Pharmacological considerations Two-step activation required with CYP2C19; CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms may decrease efficacy One-step activation dependent on CYP3A4 to active metabolite No hepatic activation required; metabolism through CYP3A4/5
Precautions and clinical considerations Efficacy might be reduced when administered with CYP219 inhibitors (i.e., PPI)
  • Contraindicated with history of stroke or TIA and severe hepatic disease

  • Caution in patients >75 years and <60 kg

  • Administration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers

  • Administration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers

  • Patients at risk of bradycardia events

Most frequent adverse effects Bleeding, rash Bleeding, rash (cross-sensitivity with clopidogrel) Bleeding, dyspnea (12% vs 6.5%)
Cost $2.71/day
Generic $0.92/day
$2.71/day $2.96/day

ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Adverse effects of antiplatelet agents

Bleeding

All medications are known to have adverse effects, and consideration of the adverse effects within the context of the benefit posed to the patient is foremost in a clinician’s mind when initiating drug therapy. The primary adverse effects of antiplatelet therapy involve both minor and major bleeding events. Patients should be educated regarding the potential risk of bleeding and should self-monitor for signs of gastrointestinal bleeding and bruising. The definition of major bleeding is inconsistent between trials but generally includes any intracranial bleeding, bleeding requiring intervention or bleeding with a significant reduction in hemoglobin.8 In the trials assessing the use of antiplatelet therapy in ACS, rates of major bleeding varied between 1.8% and 11.6%, with the differing definitions influencing the variation. In general, the rates of major bleeding are in the range of 2%-3% when ASA is used in combination with a second antiplatelet agent.9

The benefits of prasugrel and ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel must be weighed against the increase in the risk of bleeding. Prasugrel was associated with significant increases in major, life-threatening and fatal bleeding in the total study population and increased intracranial bleeding in those with a history of cerebrovascular disease. Prasugrel should not be administered to patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack and was not shown to be beneficial in patients 75 years or older and those weighing less than 60 kg.3 The product monograph includes a boxed warning that highlights the bleeding risks in this population and recommends avoidance in these patients.6 Ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding and should be used with caution in patients at a higher risk of bleeding. It is contraindicated in patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage.7

Low-dose ASA (81 mg/day in Canada) is the optimal dose after ACS.2 There does not appear to be added benefit for high-dose ASA, and major bleeding is increased in a dose-dependent manner.10,11

Current Canadian antiplatelet guidelines indicate that patients who are receiving ASA or DAPT and develop significant bruising should be assessed with a complete blood count and international normalized ratio (INR), as well as an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to assess whether the patient has thrombocytopenia or a coagulopathy. In the absence of these, antiplatelet therapy can be continued with clinical observation, whereas in those with thrombocytopenia or a coagulopathy, ASA or DAPT should be stopped pending further investigation. Patients who are receiving DAPT and in whom there is excessive bleeding after a dental procedure should have local pressure applied and use tranexamic acid mouthwash 2 to 4 times daily for 1 to 2 days. Patients receiving ASA or ASA and clopidogrel who develop subconjunctival bleeding should continue therapy and be monitored for bleeding.1 For any individual patient presenting with bleeding, the risks and benefits of stopping DAPT should be evaluated.

Respiratory reactions

ASA-induced respiratory reactions occur in approximately 0.3% of the general population. These reactions are not IgE mediated but rather due to COX-1 inhibition. Respiratory reactions associated with ASA can occur in up to 5% to 10% of asthmatic patients. Onset is generally 0.5 to 3 hours after ingestion, and symptoms include rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, ocular tearing and conjunctival injection and/or bronchoconstriction. Patients who develop ASA sensitivity need to avoid ASA and other COX-1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). ASA desensitization can be safely used to reintroduce ASA in patients with a history of a respiratory-induced reaction.12,13

Ticagrelor was associated with an increased risk of mild to moderate and usually transient dyspnea compared with clopidogrel. Dyspnea rarely resulted in treatment discontinuation (0.9% ticagrelor vs 0.1% placebo). In general, ticagrelor-induced dyspnea is mild and self-limiting, and approximately one-third of patients will have spontaneous resolution within 1 week. It is considered reversible upon discontinuation of the drug.4 Patients reporting new, prolonged or worsened dyspnea while on ticagrelor require appropriate investigation to ensure that other causes are ruled out.7 Less than 10% of patients in the PLATO (the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) trial4 had preexisting asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, there are limited data in these patient groups.

graphic file with name 10.1177_1715163515569572-fig2.jpg

graphic file with name 10.1177_1715163515569572-fig3.jpg

Drug-induced skin eruptions

ASA-induced urticaria or angioedema can occur in approximately 0.07% to 0.2% of the general population but can occur in up to 30% of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Urticaria can occur within 15 minutes of ASA ingestion but may be delayed up to 24 hours. Although desensitization has been used in patients with ASA-induced urticaria, some patients may experience a reaction during the desensitization protocol.12

Rash may occur in up to 4% of clopidogrel-treated patients.5 The skin eruption usually presents as pruritic macular erythematous confluent rash on the trunk that may become generalized. It typically presents on day 6 after exposure to clopidogrel. Options for reintroduction include switching to alternative therapies (i.e., ticagrelor), short-term steroids or clopidogrel desensitization.14 The incidence of rash reported with ticagrelor and prasugrel is 2% and 3%, respectively.15

graphic file with name 10.1177_1715163515569572-fig4.jpg

graphic file with name 10.1177_1715163515569572-fig5.jpg

Prasugrel bears some chemical similarity to other thienopyridines, and potential exists for cross-reactivity with clopidrogel. In one case series, allergenic cross-reactivity following a previous reaction to clopidrogel was observed in 24% of patients with ticlopidine, in 17% of patients with prasugrel and in 7% of patients with both ticlopidine and prasugrel14 by skin testing. However, there are reports of successful use of prasugrel in patients with a history of clopidogrel allergy.16,17

Other

Ticagrelor was associated with more ventricular pauses (≥3 seconds) on Holter monitoring (5.8%) compared with clopidogrel (3.6%) in the PLATO trial. However, this did not result in increased rates of pacemaker insertion, syncope, bradycardia or heart block.4 Notwithstanding, caution is warranted in patients with bradycardia, as these patients were excluded from the trial.7

Ticagrelor was associated with increases in serum creatinine and uric acid relative to clopidogrel.4 Periodic monitoring of renal function and uric acid levels (in patients with gout or at risk of hyperuricemia) may be considered.7

Other potential adverse effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor include nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, which occur in approximately 2% to 5% of patients.5-7

Drug interactions and antiplatelet agents

Pharmacodynamic interactions

Like most drugs, antiplatelet agents have potential drug interactions through both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Due to their mechanism of action, all antiplatelet agents result in an increased risk of bleeding when combined with other medications that also increase this risk. One of the most common clinical scenarios is the use of triple therapy, the combination of dual-antiplatelet therapy with oral anticoagulants, in patients with both ACS and atrial fibrillation. Most data for risk of major bleeding in this scenario are with warfarin, rather than the novel oral anticoagulants. Although the data are heterogeneous, the risk of major bleeds appears to be increased 2-fold with triple therapy over dual-antiplatelet therapy in some studies.18,19 Pharmacists should be aware of the potential for this pharmacodynamic interaction, especially when multiple prescribers are involved, to ensure appropriate assessment and monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic interactions

Although most practitioners are aware of concerns regarding a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between clopidogrel and the PPIs, as discussed in the Antiplatelet Guidelines,2 awareness of the potential pharmacokinetic interactions associated with the newer antiplatelet agents, ticagrelor and prasugrel, is also important. Pharmacokinetic studies of drug interactions with antiplatelet agents are limited, so pharmacokinetic studies of the metabolism of the agents themselves and studies using agents such as rifampin and ketoconazole may be used to predict the magnitude and direction of drug interactions.

Clopidogrel is a prodrug and must undergo a 2-step activation process. It is initially metabolized by hepatic esterases into an inactive moiety. CYP enzymes, predominantly CYP2C19 but also CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2B6, then create the active thiol derivative. Studies have demonstrated that loss of CYP2C19 activity reduces the effectiveness of clopidogrel, and alterations to this enzyme are the major mechanism for potential drug interactions. Agents that induce CYP2C19 are not felt to be of concern as genetic CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers do not appear to have a significant impact on efficacy.20

PPIs are frequently coadministered with dual-antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Observational data have raised the concern that patients taking both agents are at increased risk of further cardiovascular events.21 The rationale is that CYP2C19 is inhibited by certain PPIs, including omeprazole, resulting in less of the active moiety of clopidogrel. This reduction in activity is supported by in vitro platelet studies.1 However, other studies and observational data associate PPI use with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, even in patients not receiving concomitant clopidogrel.22-24 Two small randomized controlled trials have attempted to address this issue and have found no impact of concomitant administration on cardiovascular outcomes. However, both trials were small, and the potential risk cannot be completely dismissed.25,26 The CCS guidelines strongly recommend that patients receiving DAPT who are at high risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding receive PPIs for gastroprotection. The accompanying commentary suggests the use of PPIs with minimal effect on CYP2C19, such as pantoprazole.2

Although other potentially interacting agents are not addressed specifically in the guidelines, an in vitro study of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenez27 demonstrated that concomitant administration with clopidogrel decreased the area under the curve (AUC) of clopidogrel by 33% through inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 bioactivation. Therefore, it is important to consider the potential impact of inhibitors of CYP2C19 when assessing the choice of antiplatelet agent for a specific patient (Table 5).

Table 5.

Examples of medications that may have pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antiplatelet agents*5-7,27,28

Interaction Antiplatelet agents
Ticagrelor Clopidogrel Prasugrel
Drugs that increase effect of antiplatelet agent Ketoconazole
Nefazodone
Clarithromycin
Ritonavir
Atazanavir
Cyclosporine
Drugs that decrease effect of antiplatelet agent Rifampin Omeprazole Ritonavir
Dexamethasone Fluvoxamine
Phenytoin Fluoxetine
Carbamazepine Ketoconazole
Phenobarbital Moclobemide
Efavirenez
Drugs affected by antiplatelet agent Digoxin
*

This table is not a complete list of medications with the potential to interact.

Prasugrel is also a prodrug. It undergoes a 2-step activation process that begins with rapid hydrolysis in the intestinal lumen. The resulting thiolactone is then converted into the active metabolite. CYP3A4 is primarily responsible for this conversion, but CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 also play a role. Concerns regarding potential drug interactions with prasugrel relate to induction or inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2B6.20

Despite this potential, the product monograph states that prasugrel can be concomitantly administered with drugs that induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes. This is based on studies with ketoconazole and rifampin, which are considered strong inhibitors and inducers, respectively. Concomitant administration with ketoconazole did not show an effect on platelet aggregation or the active metabolite’s AUC and time to maximum concentration (Tmax) but did decrease the maximum concentration (Cmax) of prasugrel by 34% to 46%. A healthy volunteer study with ritonavir, a protease inhibitor that inhibits CYP3A4 and prasugrel, reported a decrease of 40% in the AUC of prasugrel’s active metabolite.28 Rifampin administration was not shown to significantly affect the inhibition of platelet aggregation or the pharmacokinetics of prasugrel.29

Ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation. However, its bioavailability is limited (20%-30%) and it is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (Pgp). Pgp inhibition, with an agent such as cyclosporine, resulted in a 2.8-fold increase in ticagrelor’s AUC.7 Ticagrelor is also a weak inhibitor of Pgp and, therefore, can increase the levels of medications with narrow therapeutic indices that are substrates of Pgp, such as digoxin.7 Pgp is, therefore, a potential mechanism for drug interactions. Following absorption, ticagrelor is further metabolized via CYP3A4 into an active metabolite. This metabolite is then conjugated and eliminated. Induction or inhibition of CYP3A4 is also a potential source of drug interactions with ticagrelor. As ticagrelor is transformed by CYP3A4 into a less potent active metabolite, inhibition of CYP3A4 will increase the effect of ticagrelor and the potential for bleeding. Agents such as rifampin that are inducers of CYP3A4 will potentially decrease the effect of ticagrelor and its efficacy.20

For all of the antiplatelet agents, it is important for pharmacists to include drug interactions in their assessment of appropriateness for an individual patient. The majority of pharmacokinetic interactions are based on limited data but should be part of the assessment and may influence the choice of antiplatelet agent or extent of monitoring.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet agents

As highlighted previously, the majority of patients will continue on dual-antiplatelet therapy for 12 months following ACS or elective PCI. During this period, patients may require CABG or noncardiac procedures. The concern of bleeding in the perioperative period is not as great as for anticoagulants, but the rate of major bleeding associated with antiplatelet therapy is high enough that each individual should undergo assessment.

For those in whom the bleeding risk is determined to be high, these agents must be withheld prior to surgery. The timing of holding these medications depends on their mechanism of action. ASA, clopidogrel and prasugrel all have an irreversible antiplatelet effect. It is recommended that ASA and clopidogrel be held for 5 days prior to surgery and prasugrel for 7 days.5,6 Ticagrelor has a reversible antiplatelet effect and should be held for 5 days prior to surgery.7 Occasionally, due to the urgency of the surgery, patients will undergo surgery without antiplatelet agents being withheld. In these individuals, pharmacists should monitor for any clinical or laboratory signs of excessive blood loss during the immediate postoperative period. For patients requiring CABG surgery specifically, ASA is not withheld and is given up to and including the day of surgery, particularly in those with a recent ACS. “Bridging therapy” with a short-acting intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (e.g., eptifibatide or tirofiban) may be considered in those patients who are unstable and awaiting CABG surgery.30 These agents have usually been stopped at least 4 hours prior to surgery.

Following surgery, it is important to ensure that DAPT is reinitiated where possible. In patients undergoing CABG surgery, ASA will be reinitiated within 6 hours of surgery to prevent graft occlusion. For those patients who were receiving DAPT preoperatively, reinitiation is recommended in those who had recent ACS and should be continued for 12 months. In addition, in those who were receiving DAPT due to stent insertion, DAPT should be reinitiated postoperatively to prevent stent thrombosis, particularly if the stented vessel was not bypassed during surgery. The timing of the reinitiation will vary from patient to patient, but studies have reported that, of those who had DAPT restarted, half resumed therapy within 14 days of surgery. Reinitiation of antiplatelet therapy in non-CABG surgery may be delayed if an epidural or spinal catheter is in place and the patient is deemed high risk for spinal hematoma formation or there would be significant consequences if bleeding did occur (e.g., intraocular bleeding).2,31,32

Patient education

It is important to educate patients on the goals of antiplatelet therapy, which are to reduce the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease, to reduce the risk of future myocardial infarctions and stroke and prevent stent thrombosis for patients who underwent PCI. It is also important that patients have a basic understanding of how exactly these therapies work, their potential adverse effects and the duration of therapy. A useful ACS educational tool that provides both visual and written information can be accessed at www.ccpn.ca.

Providing information in a more quantitative manner can aid in patient education to enhance understanding of the positive impact of antiplatelet therapy, as well as other secondary prevention modalities. In general, the number needed to treat to prevent one major cardiovascular event or death, calculated from the landmark trials for each of these agents, is 46 to 53. It is important to remember that clopidogrel was compared with ASA alone, while prasugrel and ticagrelor were compared with the combination of ASA and clopidogrel. Similarly, the number of events prevented per 1000 patients treated is 19 to 22.3,4,10 Table 6 is intended to provide pharmacists with the necessary tools to put things into perspective for patients.

Table 6.

Benefit of antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndromes3,4,10

Reduction in myocardial infarction, stroke and death
Drug* RRR (%) ARR (%) NNT Events prevented/1000 patients
Clopidogrel and ASA (compared with ASA) 20 2.1 48 20
Prasugrel and ASA (compared with clopidogrel and ASA) 19 2.2 46 22
Ticagrelor and ASA (compared with clopidogrel and ASA) 16 1.9 53 19
*

Used in conjunction with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81 to 325 mg oral daily. ASA 81 mg daily recommended with ticagrelor.

Relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of primary outcome from landmark trials (composite of death, myocardial infarction and stroke).

In addition to efficacy, it is also very important that patients are educated on the safety aspects of dual-antiplatelet therapy. Rates of major bleeding on dual-antiplatelet therapy are reported to be in the range of 2% to 3%.9 Patients should seek medical attention if they develop any unexpected, prolonged or excessive bleeding complications such as hematuria, melena, epistaxis or hematemesis.

Adherence and risk of discontinuation

Dual-antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone of ACS management. Unfortunately, nonadherence has been demonstrated in the use of these agents. Approximately 10% to 30% of patients do not fill their initial prescription for clopidogrel on the day of discharge.33,34 Also, in the Canadian setting, adherence to most chronic medications used in the care of patients with cardiovascular disease is approximately 50% to 70% at 1 year.35 In a study by Ho et al.,36 examining 7402 patients discharged from the hospital following stent implantation, a significant increase in death was demonstrated in those having any delay in filling their prescription compared with those who filled their prescription on the day of discharge (14.2% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001). Pharmacists have a key role in identifying and resolving adherence problems.

Summary

The CCS guidelines highlight the optimal use of antiplatelet therapy.1,2 This article highlights the aspects of those guidelines most relevant to pharmacists to help them care for their patients. ■

Footnotes

Author Contributions:M. Ackman initiated and coordinated the project (including editorial functions), wrote individual section of manuscript and reviewed the final draft. C. Bucci, M. Callaghan, H. Kertland, C. Pharand, P. Robertson and W. Semchuk contributed to concept and structure of manuscript, wrote individual sections of manuscript and reviewed the final draft.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding:The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1. Bell AD, Roussin A, Cartier R, et al. The use of antiplatelet therapy in the outpatient setting: Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines. Can J Cardiol 2011;27(Suppl A):S1-S59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tanguay JF, Bell AD, Ackman ML, et al. Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:1334-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe C, et al. , for the TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. , for the PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Clopidogrel. Health Canada product monograph. February 25, 2014; Sanofi-Aventis Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Prasugrel. Health Canada product monograph. September 20, 2011; Eli Lily Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ticagrelor. Health Canada product monograph. September 9, 2013; AstaZeneca Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011;123:2736-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chua D, Nishi C. New antiplatelet agents for cardiovascular disease. CMAJ 2013;185:1405-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Peters RJ, Mehta SR, Fox KA, et al. Effects of aspirin dose when used alone or in combination with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) study. Circulation 2003;108:1682-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Knowles SR, Drucker AM, Weber EA, Shear NH. Management options for patients with aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sensitivity. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:1191-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. McMullan KL, Wedner HJ. Safety of aspirin desensitization in patients with reported aspirin allergy and cardiovascular disease. Clin Cardiol 2013;36:25-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cheema AN, Mohammad A, Hong T, et al. Characterization of clopidogrel hypersensitivity reactions and management with oral steroids without clopidogrel discontinuation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1445-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ticagrelor. In: Lexi-Drugs. Hudson (OH): Lexi-Comp; 2007. Available: http://online.lexi.com/lco/action/home/switch (accessed July 25, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Raccah BH, Shalit M, Danenberg HD. Allergic reaction to prasugrel and cross-reactivity with clopidogrel. Int J Cardiol 2012;157:e48-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Felix-Getzik E, Sylvia LM. Prasugrel use in a patient allergic to clopidogrel: effect of a drug shortage on selection of dual antiplatelet therapy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:511-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Barry AR, Ackman ML. Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2012;69:1485-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lamberts M, Olesen JB, Ruwald MH, et al. Bleeding after initiation of multiple antithrombotic drugs, including triple therapy, in atrial fibrillation patients following myocardial infarction and coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation 2012;126:1185-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Egan G, Hughes C, Ackman ML. Drug interactions between antiplatelet or novel anticoagulant medications and antiretroviral medications. Ann Pharmacother 2014;48:734-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Ko DT, et al. A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ 2009;180:713-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Goodman SG, Clare R, Pieper KS, et al. Association of proton pump inhibitor use on cardiovascular outcomes with clopidogrel and ticagrelor: insights from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes trial. Circulation 2012;125:978-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Schmidt M, Johansen MB, Robertson DJ, et al. Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors is not associated with major adverse cardiovascular events following coronary stent implantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35:165-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Charlot M, Grove EL, Hansen PR, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of adverse cardiovascular events in aspirin treated patients with first time myocardial infarction: nationwide propensity score matched study. BMJ 2011;342:d2690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bhatt DL, Cryer BL, Contant CF, et al. Clopidogrel with or without omeprazole in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1909-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hsu PI, Lai KH, Liu CP. Esomeprazole with clopidogrel reduces peptic ulcer, compared with clopidogrel alone in patients with atherosclerosis. Gastroenterology 2011;140:791-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Xu C, Desta Z. In vitro analysis and quantitative prediction of efavirenz inhibition of eight cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes: major effects of CYPs 2B6, 2C8, 2C9 and 2C19. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2013;28:362-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ancrenaz V, Deglon J, Samer C, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between prasugrel and ritonavir in healthy volunteers. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2013;112:132-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Farid NA, Jakubowski JA, Payne CD, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel in healthy male subjects. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1821-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pickett AM, Taylor DA, Ackman ML. Prolonged Infusion of eptifibatide as a bridge therapy between bare-metal stent insertion and cardiovascular surgery: case report and review of the literature. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:127e-33e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Korte W, Cattaneo M, Chassot PG, et al. Peri-operative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost 2011;105:743-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease requiring cardiac and noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2013;128:2785-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ackman ML, Graham MM, Hui C, Tsuyuki RT. Effect of a prior authorization process on antiplatelet therapy and outcomes in patients prescribed clopidogrel following coronary stenting. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:1205-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sheehy O, LeLorier J, Rinfret S. Restrictive access to clopidogrel and mortality following coronary stent implantation. CMAJ 2008;178:413-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jackevicius CA, Li P, Tu JV. Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of primary nonadherence after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008;117:1028-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ho PM, Tsai TT, Maddox TM, et al. Delays in filling clopidogrel prescription after hospital discharge and adverse outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation: implications for transitions of care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:261-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ are provided here courtesy of University of Toronto Press

RESOURCES