Background: Aggregates of the 50-aa protein medin are the main constituent of aortic medial amyloid.
Results: Medin aggregation involves an aspartate residue analogous to Asp23 of the Alzheimer Aβ peptide.
Conclusion: There are striking similarities in the aggregation properties of medin and Aβ.
Significance: Mechanistic insights will assist future investigations of medin in the most common form of human amyloid.
Keywords: Amyloid, Amyloid-beta (AB), Homology Modeling, Protein Misfolding, Protein Structure, Site-directed Mutagenesis, Dipolar Assisted Rotational Resonance, Rotational Echo Double Resonance, Salt Bridge, Solid-state NMR
Abstract
Aortic medial amyloid (AMA) is the most common localized human amyloid, occurring in virtually all of the Caucasian population over the age of 50. The main protein component of AMA, medin, readily assembles into amyloid-like fibrils in vitro. Despite the prevalence of AMA, little is known about the self-assembly mechanism of medin or the molecular architecture of the fibrils. The amino acid sequence of medin is strikingly similar to the sequence of the Alzheimer disease (AD) amyloid-β (Aβ) polypeptides around the structural turn region of Aβ, where mutations associated with familial, early onset AD, have been identified. Asp25 and Lys30 of medin align with residues Asp23 and Lys28 of Aβ, which are known to form a stabilizing salt bridge in some fibril morphologies. Here we show that substituting Asp25 of medin with asparagine (D25N) impedes assembly into fibrils and stabilizes non-cytotoxic oligomers. Wild-type medin, by contrast, aggregates into β-sheet-rich amyloid-like fibrils within 50 h. A structural analysis of wild-type fibrils by solid-state NMR suggests a molecular repeat unit comprising at least two extended β-strands, separated by a turn stabilized by a Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge. We propose that Asp25 drives the assembly of medin by stabilizing the fibrillar conformation of the peptide and is thus reminiscent of the influence of Asp23 on the aggregation of Aβ. Pharmacological comparisons of wild-type medin and D25N will help to ascertain the pathological significance of this poorly understood protein.
Introduction
Approximately 30 proteins are known to form pathogenic amyloid or amyloid-like fibrillar networks in a wide range of human tissues (1) and are associated with diseases having high morbidity and mortality rates (2). Recent atomic and molecular level interrogations of fibrillar amyloid proteins have unveiled a variety of interactions, such as π-stacking of aromatic residues (3–6), van der Waals interactions (7), and salt bridges, that can stabilize the characteristic cross-β arrangement within the fibrils (8, 9). The 40- and 42-residue β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides associated with Alzheimer disease are structurally the best characterized of the amyloid proteins, and detailed molecular models have been assembled from NMR (9, 10), EPR (11, 12), and FRET (13, 14) constraints. The molecular repeat unit of the various known Aβ fibrillar morphologies consists of two β-strands separated by a turn through residues 25–29, which aligns the hydrophobic faces of the two cross-β segments (Fig. 1A).
Aortic medial amyloid (AMA),2 which is prevalent in over 97% of the Caucasian population over the age of 50, is primarily located within the medial layer of the aorta in close association with the elastic structures of the internal elastic laminae (15). It is thought that AMA may have a role in thoracic aneurysm and dissection (16). The polypeptide medin, a 50-residue cleavage product of the protein lactadherin, is the principal protein component of plaques (17). Although AMA is the most common form of localized amyloid, little is known about the biophysical and structural properties of fibrillar medin (15). Previous studies have demonstrated the 18–19 C-terminal residues of medin constitute an amyloid-promoting region, and a peptide, H2N-N42FGSVQFV-COOH (Med(42–49)), is capable of forming highly ordered fibrils within 48 h (3, 4). Structural studies of this fragment revealed β-sheets of hydrogen-bonded peptides in an in-register, parallel configuration with pairs of β-sheets stabilized by intermolecular π-π interactions between aromatic groups of amino acids Phe43 and Phe48 of opposing layers (6). Further solid-state NMR measurements indicated that this packing arrangement is not conserved in fibrils of full-length medin (5).
Medin has a 16% global sequence identity with Aβ and, strikingly, a high local sequence similarity within an amino acid stretch incorporating the turn region of Aβ from residues 25–29 (Fig. 1B, box). In this alignment, Asp23 and Lys28 of Aβ correspond precisely with Asp25 and Lys30 of medin. Asp23 and Lys28 of Aβ can form a stabilizing salt bridge that influences the geometry and mechanical properties of the fibrils (Fig. 1A) (9, 18–21). The region encompassing the Asp23-Lys28 salt bridge is also critical to the kinetic and structural elements of Aβ aggregation. Aβ(1–40) with a β-lactam bridge between Asp23 and Lys28 rapidly elongates into fibrils without a preceding lag phase and with a reduced critical concentration for fibril formation (22). Phosphorylation of Ser26 within the turn region has also been shown to prevent Aβ fibrillation (23). Importantly, mutations in the turn region of Aβ, including the Iowa mutation D23N, are associated with early onset of Alzheimer disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (24–28). The local sequence similarity of Aβ and medin may thus have implications for the fibrillar self-assembly mechanism of medin in AMA.
We investigate here whether Asp25 of medin influences the kinetics and pathway of protein self-assembly and the morphology of the aggregates, similarly to Asp23 of Aβ. The aggregation characteristics of the wild-type protein are compared with those of a model mutant, D25N, analogous to the naturally occurring, disease-linked D23N Aβ Iowa mutation. Solid-state NMR methods are used to investigate whether residues Asp25 and Lys30 of medin are capable of forming a salt bridge that influences fibril growth and morphology. A combination of biophysical measurements and computational modeling is used to provide the first working model of the medin fibrillar architecture.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Synthetic wild-type (WT) medin was purchased from Peptide Protein Research Ltd. (Fareham, UK) with uniformly 13C- and 15N-labeled amino acids Ala13, Asp25, and Lys30.
Sequence Alignment
Sequence alignment of medin and Aβ(1–40) was performed using the LAlign server (29). LAlign both provides a global sequence identity output and highlights areas of local similarity, which is ideal for identifying possible amyloidogenic motifs that may be missed with global alignments. The alignment was carried out using the BLOSUM50 matrix with a gap open penalty of −12 and a gap extension penalty of −2 with a threshold of 10.
Expression and Purification of Medin
Non-labeled and 13C and 15N isotope-labeled medin was expressed and purified as described by Davies et al. (30) and used for biophysical characterization and NMR studies. Medin Asp25 was mutated to Asn25 (D25N) using the site-directed ligase-independent mutation (SLIM) method as described by Chiu et al. (31) and confirmed by sequencing (GATC Biotech Ltd., London, UK). D25N was expressed and purified using the same procedures for producing WT non-labeled medin. Recombinant proteins were analyzed in 20 mm sodium phosphate, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.4.
Biophysical Measurements
Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence assays were carried out on a Flexstation 3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices Ltd.). Experiments were carried out in triplicate in 96-well black-walled, clear bottomed microplates (Nunc). Data were recorded using bottom read mode, with excitation at 450 nm and emission at 485 nm. ThT solution was injected into the samples (20 μm medin) at the start of the read, to a final ThT concentration of 20 μm. The assay was conducted at 30 °C with no agitation. The ThT curves were fitted as described by Alvarez-Martinez et al. (32).
where y represents the polymerization, t is time, Ti is the inflection point of the sigmoidal, and the slope 1/τ is the rate of polymerization. The lag time can be calculated using the following equation,
Circular dichroism (CD) measurements were carried out at beamline B23 at Diamond Light Source (Oxford, UK). Freshly prepared medin was incubated at a concentration of 200 μm, at 30 °C, in the cuvette (121.000-QS, Hellma UK Ltd.) for the duration of the time course. Single scans were recorded every 2 h between 260 and 190 nm, using a slit width of 0.5 mm, a 0.5-cm path length, and a scan rate of 1 nm/s, over 44 h. The baseline was subtracted prior to secondary structure analysis. Analysis was carried out using Olis® GolbalWorks software. Data at each time point were subject to two fitting methods, CONTILL and CDSSTR, using either basis sets 8 or 11 (33–35). The best fit, as determined by the normalized spectral fit S.D. value, was selected, and the percentages of α-helix, β-sheet, turn, and random coil content were recorded.
Intrinsic fluorescence measurements were carried out on a Cary Eclipse Varian fluorescence spectrometer operating on a 20 μm medin solution at 30 °C. Tryptophan residues were excited at 279 nm, and the emission spectra were recorded between 300 and 400 nm with a band pass of 5 nm (36).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on medin after incubation for 50 h. Protein suspensions (10 μl) were loaded onto carbon-coated copper grids and negatively stained with 4% uranyl acetate. Samples were visualized on a Tecnai 10 electron microscope at 100 kV.
Cell Viability
Primary human aortic smooth muscle cells HAoSMC (Promocell, Germany) were plated on 96-well plates at 4,000 cells/well and grown for 48 h. Protein samples preincubated for 50 h at 20 μm were added to cells. Following incubation for 48 h, 10 μl of Cell Counting Kit-8 solution (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was added and further incubated for 2 h, prior to measuring absorbance at 450 nm. The percentage of cell viability was calculated based on the absorbance measured relative to that of cells exposed to buffer alone.
Immunoblot Analysis
10 μl of peptide suspension was blotted onto nitrocellulose paper and allowed to dry. Blots were incubated with either A11 or OC primary antibodies (Merck Millipore) (1:1,000) for 1 h, washed, and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare). Bound antibodies were detected using an electrochemiluminescence system (Merck Millipore) on carefully exposed film to avoid saturation.
Preparation of Medin Fibrils for Solid-state NMR Studies
Selectively labeled synthetic medin was lyophilized and subjected to three dissolution-evaporation cycles with hexafluoroisopropyl alcohol to break up any initial aggregates. The peptides were then dissolved in DMSO and added to double-distilled H2O to a final DMSO concentration of 10% (v/v) at a medin concentration of 200 μm and incubated with agitation at room temperature for up to 21 days. Uniformly 13C- and 15N-isotopically labeled recombinant medin was incubated at a concentration of 200 μm in buffer (20 mm sodium phosphate, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.4) for 21 days with agitation at room temperature. The morphology of fibrils formed at 30 °C with no agitation and at room temperature with agitation was indistinguishable as assessed by TEM, but the latter method gave a much higher fibril yield and therefore was used to generate the NMR samples. The resultant fibrils were harvested by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 1 h to generate a tightly packed pellet before being transferred to a zirconium 3.2- or 4-mm rotor with a Kel-F cap (Bruker, Coventry, UK).
Solid-state NMR Measurements
Dipolar assisted rotational resonance (DARR) NMR experiments were performed using a Bruker wide bore spectrometer operating at a static magnetic field of 20 teslas with a Bruker 3.2-mm triple resonance probe head in double resonance mode. Samples were maintained at −23 °C with a sample rotation frequency of 14 kHz ± 1 Hz. Experiments utilized a 1H 90° excitation pulse length of 2.5 μs, Hartmann-Hahn cross-polarization over a 1-ms contact time, 3-μs 13C 90° pulses, SPINAL proton decoupling at 100 kHz, and a 1.5-s recycle delay. The proton field was reduced to 14 kHz during DARR mixing times of 10 or 50 ms. Phase-sensitive spectra were obtained using time-proportional phase incrementation with 420 points in the indirect dimension. The spectrum at each t1 increment was the result of accumulating between 300 and 1024 transients. Frequency-selective rotational echo double resonance (FSR) solid-state NMR experiments were performed on hydrated fibrils using a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer operating at a magnetic field of 9.3 teslas.
Frequency-selective rotational echo, double resonance (FSR) NMR experiments were performed on samples packed into a 4-mm zirconium rotor and rotated at the magic angle while maintaining the spinning rate automatically to within ± 1 Hz. All experiments utilized cross-polarization with an initial 4.0-μs 1H 90° excitation pulse, 1-ms Hartmann-Hahn contact time at a matched 1H field of 65 kHz, two-pulse phase-modulated proton decoupling (37) at a field of 85 kHz following cross-polarization, and a 1-s recycle delay. 13C-Observed FSR measurements with 15N dephasing were conducted using the pulse sequence described by Jaroniec et al. (38). The magic angle spinning frequency was 7,400 Hz. To observe 13C dephasing, a train of 82 or 122 non-selective 4-μs π pulses was applied at the 15N frequency every half rotor cycle, corresponding to total dephasing times of 5.5 and 8.2 ms, respectively. Frequency-selective 883-ms Gaussian pulses (defined by 1,000 points and truncated at 1% of the maximum amplitude) were applied in the center of the dephasing period. The frequencies of the Gaussian pulses were centered on the amide 13C and lysine ζ-15N resonance frequencies in order to selectively recouple the nuclear spins resonating at these frequencies. A second, control measurement was also performed at each dephasing time, omitting all 15N irradiation so as to observe the loss of 13C coherence resulting from processes not related to 13C-15N recoupling. Spectra were obtained by averaging eight blocks, each accumulated from 20,480 transients and alternating experiments with 15N irradiation and experiments without 15N irradiation so as to adjust for any drift in probe tuning during the long acquisition time. The extent of dephasing resulting from 13C-15N dipolar coupling (SD) was quantified as the peak intensity observed with 15N irradiation divided by the intensity observed in the absence of 15N irradiation. SD was translated into a 13C-15N distance using a C program written specifically for that purpose.
Simulation of DARR Spectra
DARR spectra were simulated using C programs written specifically for that purpose. Simulated DARR spectra were used to assess the secondary structure content of the experimental DARR spectra. Time domain signals were simulated as 512 × 512 matrices, and complex Fourier transformation was performed in two dimensions to obtain the frequency domain spectra. The 13C resonance frequencies used in the simulations were calculated using standard chemical shift values for α-helix and random coil (39) or using SHIFTX2 (40) back-predictions from structural models. 13C resonance frequencies were also taken directly from the simulated DARR spectra; only short range couplings between directly bonded spins were considered, and long range couplings were neglected to simplify the simulated spectra. Each free induction decay in the t2 dimension was modulated therefore by no more than three frequencies in t1 (i.e. depending on the number of bonded carbon atoms), which restricted the number of cross-peaks.
RESULTS
Fibrillization Invokes Large Scale Structural Changes in Medin
The aggregation properties of WT medin were assessed using several complementary techniques. ThT fluorescence indicated that medin (20 μm) aggregation occurs over 50 h (Fig. 2A). Analysis of the growth kinetics indicated that the elongation stage reached completion after ∼32 h with a growth rate of 1.28 h−1 (Table 1). The small reversible increase in fluorescence before the prominent enhancement is not typical of a lag period preceding nucleation and rapid elongation. Consequently, the fit to this part of the ThT data is poor, and it is not possible to measure with certainty the lag time or determine the time when irreversible fibril growth is initiated. The initial fluorescence increase may be due to a small population of transient, ThT-responsive intermediates, but the precise nature of these species is not known at this stage.
TABLE 1.
WT | D25N | |
---|---|---|
Maximum fluorescence intensity | 716.07 (1.92) | 567.31 (2.56) |
Rate (h−1) | 1.28 (0.04) | 1.43 (0.08) |
R2 | 0.985 | 0.951 |
Analysis of medin aggregation by CD (Fig. 2, B and C) shows a progressive change in the secondary structure over the 44-h time course. The onset of the structural transition occurs earlier than the large increase in ThT fluorescence, but this probably reflects the higher medin concentration required for the CD analysis (200 μm). Secondary structure content was estimated by applying four fitting regimes to the CD data: CONTILL with basis set 8, CONTILL with basis set 11, CDSSTR with basis set 8, or CDSSTR with basis set 11. All four regimes showed a conversion of α-helix to β-sheet over time but varied in the percentage contributions of the secondary structure. However, due to the dynamic changes occurring in the secondary structure and the solubility of medin over time, for each time point, we used the regime that gave the lowest S.D. and report the values recorded. Using this approach, the initial state is estimated to be predominantly helical and undergoes a transition toward ∼65% β-sheet (and ∼35% random coil) structure at the end point, consistent with amyloid formation (Fig. 2C). The fit at the end point was rather poorer than observed earlier, possibly because of precipitation of the insoluble fibrils. The structural conversion from α-helix to β-sheet broadly coincides with the aggregation time course observed in the ThT profile (Fig. 2, A and C). TEM of medin at the end of the time course (50 h) confirmed the presence of dense amyloid-like fibrillar networks (Fig. 2D).
Substitution of Aspartate 25 by Asparagine Stabilizes Medin Oligomers
In order to investigate the role of Asp25 in the self-assembly of medin, a model mutant with a single amino acid substitution, D25N, was generated. D25N showed a similar ThT profile to WT medin, albeit with a shorter lag time (26 h) and lower final ThT fluorescence (567 relative fluorescence units) (Fig. 4A and Table 1), reaching an apparent end point after ∼32 h. Like WT, D25N also exhibits an initial increase in fluorescence followed by a return to the baseline prior to the main fluorescence increase. As speculated above, this could represent a transient intermediate population that appears to be larger in relation to the final fluorescence than is observed for WT. The reversibility of the initial fluorescence hump may indicate that the intermediates undergo a structural rearrangement or disassemble into smaller species that are unresponsive to ThT. CD measurements indicate that although there is a general time-dependent shift toward a β-sheet structure, the mutant retains a much higher α-helical content than the WT protein after 50 h (∼50%) regardless of the regime and basis set used for the analysis (Fig. 3, B and C). Strikingly, TEM images of D25N after 50 h do not reveal any fibrillar structures, but small, spherical, concave structures are present that are similar in appearance to previously described oligomeric amyloid species (Fig. 3D) (41, 42). Hence, although the aggregation kinetics for WT medin and D25N appear to be similar as assessed by ThT, the mutant is impeded in the rate of assembly into fibrils.
The D25N species present after 50 h stain weakly with the A11 antibody that is reactive to prefibrillar oligomers regardless of protein sequence, whereas WT medin is A11-negative after 50 h (43) (Fig. 4A). Prefibrillar oligomers are defined as transient intermediates that are generally considered to undergo large scale concerted conformation changes to ultimately form fibrils (44). Hence, the mutation may stabilize prefibrillar oligomers of medin that, according to CD analysis, retain the initial helical conformation that WT medin loses during its unhindered assembly into fibrils. Both WT medin and D25N are stained much more strongly by the OC antibody that is reactive to both fibrillar oligomers and to fibrils (Fig. 4A) (43). In the case of WT protein, it is likely that the antibody reacts with the abundant protein fibrils, but for D25N, no fibrils were detected by TEM, so it is possible that OC is detecting fibrillar oligomers, which may also account for the relatively large ThT response. Stable Aβ oligomers were produced according to Haupt et al. (45) and used as a positive control for the A11 antibody. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a negative control (Fig. 4A).
The aggregated mutant and wild-type proteins were tested for their effects on human aortic smooth muscle cell viability. Following an equivalent incubation time (50 h), WT and D25N have significantly different cytotoxic effects (p < 0.01). The WT species show a small but significant (p < 0.01) increase in cytotoxicity relative to live control (Fig. 4C). The low level of toxicity for aggregated WT medin is consistent with medin fibril toxicity described previously (16, 46). By contrast, the D25N aggregates are not toxic to human aortic smooth muscle cells.
Assembly Pathways of Medin and D25N
The D25N mutation may stabilize oligomeric species that are also formed by WT on-pathway to the fibrillar end-product, or the mutation may direct the assembly along a different pathway. Measurements of Trp11 and Trp21 intrinsic fluorescence provided some indication of the assembly pathways of the two medin peptides. WT medin (in the absence of ThT) gave an initial maximum fluorescence emission at around 360 nm, consistent with both tryptophan groups being exposed to the aqueous solvent (Fig. 5A). The emission is relatively constant for first 30 h, and then a gradual loss of overall fluorescence intensity occurs over ∼13 h, after which the fluorescence stabilizes again. The spectra were not consistent with a time-dependent shift of a single emission maximum wavelength but instead suggested that the initial species decreased over time as a new species emerged. Over a 50-h time period, the initial component at 355 nm decreased in intensity, and a second component emerged with an emission maximum around 330 nm, with both components being present at the end point (see below for further analysis). For D25N, no change in maximum fluorescence emission wavelength is observed over the 50-h time course, and, surprisingly, a substantial time-dependent increase in maximum intensity occurs at 342 nm (Fig. 5B). The fluorescence trend is consistent with both tryptophan side groups remaining exposed or becoming more exposed to water over the 50-h time course. The marked differences in the tryptophan fluorescence imply that the two medin peptides follow rather different assembly pathways.
One interpretation of the WT medin fluorescence profile is that a new species is formed over time with one of the tryptophan groups remaining solvent-exposed (the ∼359-nm component) and the other in a more hydrophobic environment (the ∼330-nm component) (47). A good fit to the initial (t = 0) spectrum could be obtained with a single Gaussian curve centered at 359 nm (not presented). Subtraction of the initial Gaussian curve (scaled appropriately) from the end point spectrum at 50 h yielded a difference spectrum that could also be fitted by a Gaussian function, centered at 327 nm (not presented). Good fits to all of the spectra at the intervening time points were then obtained by combining the two Gaussian curves in different proportions to give estimates of the contributions of the two components (examples given in Fig. 5C). The change in emission intensities for the two components mirrors the aggregation time course observed in the ThT fluorescence profile (Figs. 5D and 2A).
Evidence for a Asp23-Lys28 Salt Bridge in Wild-type Medin Fibrils
Asp25 clearly influences the aggregation pathway and morphology of medin, so we investigated whether a Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge, analogous to the Aβ Asp23-Lys28 salt bridge, influences medin self-assembly and is present in the insoluble protein fibrils. In order to test for the presence of a salt bridge, fibrils were prepared from synthetic medin containing uniformly 13C/15N-labeled Asp25 and Lys30 to enable measurements of distance-dependent 15N-13C dipolar couplings between the two residues by FSR solid-state NMR. The protein was also uniformly 13C-labeled at Ala13 to probe the local structural environment from the measured chemical shifts. A 13C DARR spectrum of the fibrils (at a 50-ms mixing time) was assigned unambiguously to all carbon sites of the labeled amino acids (amide region shown in Fig. 6A), and the 13C chemical shifts are summarized in Table 2. The values for the Cα, Cβ, and carbonyl (C′) shifts for the three residues are all consistent with these regions of the sequence adopting a β-strand conformation (39). A Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge would require a necessarily short (∼4.0 Å) separation of the carbon and nitrogen atoms of the amino acid COO− and NH3+ groups (Fig. 6B). FSR measurements were carried out under conditions to detect a dipolar interaction selectively between the amino 15Nζ of Lys30 and Cγ of Asp25 if the distance between them were constrained by a salt bridge. The dipolar interaction was monitored by measuring the intensities of the peak envelope in the carbonyl region (from 167 to 183 ppm) of the 13C spectrum (Fig. 6C). The ratio of the peak intensities measured with radiofrequency pulses applied at the 15N frequency (S) and the measured intensities in the absence of pulses (S0) is, in general, proportional to the 13C-15N interatomic distance. Here, a progressive decrease in S/S0 is observed as the dephasing time increases (Fig. 6, C and D). The reduction in intensity is not uniform across the entire carbonyl region, and a difference spectrum (Δ) indicates that the loss of peak intensity is centered at 173.0 ppm, close to the resonance frequency of Cγ for Asp25 (Fig. 6C). The FSR data were compared with simulated S/S0 curves corresponding to different 13C-15N distances (Fig. 6D, dashed and dotted lines, respectively). A correction factor of 0.25 was applied to the simulated curves to adjust for the Asp25 (backbone), Lys30, and Ala13 signals that overlap with the Asp25 Cγ peak in the carbonyl region. When taking the signal/noise ratio into consideration (indicated by the error bars and shaded region), the data fall within the range bounded by curves representing 13C–15N distances of 3.8 and 3.2 Å. These values lie within the 4-Å limit for oppositely charged groups that commonly defines a salt bridge (48). Furthermore, these values are remarkably similar to the Asp23/Lys28 calculated distance reported for some Aβ fibril morphologies (10). Although there are uncertainties in the accuracy of these measurements arising from the overlapping signals in the carbonyl region, the FSR data together with the observations of D25N support the argument that a Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge stabilizes medin fibrils. It is not possible at this stage to determine whether the salt bridge is intramolecular, intermolecular, or a mixture of both.
TABLE 2.
Residue | Position |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C′ | Cα | Cβ | Cγ | Cδ | Cζ | |
ppm | ||||||
Ala13 | 175.7 (175.7) | 51.2 (51.4) | 22.9 (21.6) | |||
Asp25 | 173.8 (174.1) | 53.4 (53.2) | 41.3 (42.9) | 173.2 | ||
Lys30 | 175.1 (174.8) | 55.7 (55.5) | 36.8 (34.7) | 25.2 | 29.7 | 42.5 |
Structural Analysis of Wild-type Medin Fibrils
A 13C DARR solid-state NMR spectrum of uniformly 13C/15N-labeled medin fibrils exhibits peaks that are rather broad and suggestive of local structural disorder or fibrillar heterogeneity (Fig. 7). Nevertheless, several intraresidue cross-peaks can be identified as well as an interresidue cross-peak indicative of long range coupling between tryptophan residue Trp11 and/or Trp21 and isoleucine residue Ile35 and/or Ile36 (Fig. 7). This cross-peak remained visible in a DARR spectrum of fibrils prepared from labeled medin diluted with a 3-fold excess of unlabeled medin, although it was not possible to determine the relative cross-peak intensity because of lower signal/noise ratio (data not shown). Dilution tends to abolish cross-peaks arising from intermolecular couplings, and the data suggest that the Trp-Ile cross-peak arises from intramolecular coupling between tryptophan and isoleucine residues. However, higher (>5-fold) dilution would be necessary to attribute the cross-peaks to intramolecular couplings unequivocally, but this was not possible because the further signal reduction would require longer measurement times than were available.
The spectrum was compared with simulated spectra generated from average Cα, Cβ, and C′ chemical shift values for medin residues in 100% α-helical or β-sheet conformations and as 100% random coil (Fig. 8). Similarities in the experimental and simulated spectra suggest that the fibrillar structure is a mixture of random coil and β-sheet elements (Fig. 8, A and B), but there is little evidence of any α-helical content (Fig. 8C). The shifts measured from a few characteristic Cα-Cβ cross-peaks are consistent with the two threonines (Thr33 and Thr37), some of the valines (Val12, Val22, Val32, Val46, and Val48), and some of the alanines (Ala10, Ala13, Ala40, and Ala50) occurring in β-sheet regions. However, at least one valine and one alanine (not Ala13) and at least one of the tryptophans (Trp11 and/or Trp21) occur in disordered regions.
Topological models of the fibrillar assemblies of Aβ, amylin, and others indicate a common hairpin-like structure (49). We propose, as a working model, a similar structure for the medin fibrils, with a disordered N-terminal region and two β-sheet segments separated by a turn stabilized by a Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge (Fig. 9A). The tentative divisions between the unstructured, β-sheet, and turn regions are based on the analysis of the DARR spectrum, with Ala10, Trp11, and Val12 in the unstructured region and Trp21, Thr33, Thr37, and the remaining alanines and valines in β-sheet regions (Fig. 9B). One serine Cα-Cβ cross-peak could not be accounted for by standard β-sheet, α-helix, or random coil chemical shift values (labeled S? in Fig. 9B), possibly originating from Ser28 or Ser29 in the turn region. The 18 C-terminal residues alone are known to be highly amyloidogenic (4–6), and it is reasonable to model this region as one of the cross-β segments. Moreover, Trp11 is solvent-exposed, and Trp21 is buried within a hydrophobic cross-β interface close to Ile35, consistent with the fluorescence data and the DARR spectrum. A simulated DARR spectrum, generated from the predicted chemical shifts for this model, agrees well with the experimental spectrum (Fig. 9B, red spectrum). The proposed scheme in Fig. 9A is reminiscent of the Aβ hairpin structure (9, 10), and, interestingly, a homology model of medin, generated using the Aβ(1–40) 2-fold symmetry model (Protein Data Bank entry 2LMN) as a structural template and the sequence alignment in Fig. 1B, also allows for an Asp25-Lys30 salt bridge and close packing of Trp21 and Ile35 (Fig. 10A). A simulated DARR spectrum, calculated from the 13C chemical shifts predicted from this model using SHIFTX2, also agrees well with the experimental spectrum (Fig. 10B). This model will serve as a useful guide for the design of further experiments to test and refine the medin fibrillar structure.
DISCUSSION
We report here the first systematic characterization of medin self-assembly. Under the conditions used here, WT medin undergoes a secondary structure rearrangement to form characteristic amyloid-like fibrils following a lag time of ∼27 h. This is consistent with previous reports of medin aggregation in vitro (4). Comparison of medin with the well characterized Aβ polypeptides led us to formulate a hypothesis of a stabilizing salt bridge in medin aggregates. Here, we have demonstrated, using computational modeling, CD, and solid-state NMR, that medin aggregates form predominantly β-sheet structures, consistent with a hairpin arrangement. Additional internuclear distance measurements suggest that a salt bridge at this location is feasible. Furthermore, removal of the aspartate residue at position 25 results in an altered self-assembly pathway suggesting that it has a key role in directing amyloid formation of medin.
The altered aggregation characteristics of D25N lead to a morphologically distinct species with a high α-helical content reminiscent of previously identified α-helical amyloid oligomers (50–52). Interestingly, the D25N species appear to be ThT-responsive (Fig. 3), yet TEM analysis shows only concave circular species, 35–100 nm in diameter (Fig. 4D), similar to other reported amyloid oligomers (53–55). No fibrillar aggregates were detected by TEM, and no visible precipitate was observed, although the presence of a small, highly ThT reactive population of fibrils cannot be ruled out entirely. The ThT-reactive oligomers may also occur as short lived intermediates on the assembly pathway of WT medin but, in the D25N mutant, are prevented from maturing into fibrils. Although we did not test for the presence of ThT-reactive, soluble oligomers of WT medin, the intrinsic fluorescence measurements (Fig. 5) suggest that the D25N oligomers are formed on a pathway different from WT assembly. D25N assembly gives rise to a substantial increase in tryptophan florescence, whereas the assembly pathway of WT medin gives a concomitant decrease in tryptophan fluorescence. The presence of oligomers was confirmed using A11 conformer-specific antibodies (Fig. 4A). It is often speculated that amyloid oligomers are the predominant cytotoxic species along the amyloid formation pathway. In light of our findings, we tested the cytotoxicity of D25N oligomer-like aggregates on human aortic cells. Interestingly, these aggregates were not significantly toxic to cells (Fig. 4C). D25N thus interferes with medin aggregation, appearing to prevent or impede the evolution of oligomers into fibrillar assemblies. It is possible that the aggregates formed by D25N represent an off-pathway intermediate (56). Recent work on Aβ has suggested that the presence of a salt bridge may be required for fibrillization, but may not be needed for oligomerization (23).
Asp25 appears to be influential in directing the self-assembly pathway of medin, reminiscent of the role that Asp23 plays in Aβ assembly. The Iowa Aβ mutant (D23N) completely alters the aggregation kinetics and fibrillar structure in familial, early onset Alzheimer disease (23). This mutation rapidly accelerates aggregation and results in enhanced toxicity and altered pathology (27). Conversely, other mutations within the turn region (G25P and E22V) have been shown to form non-toxic oligomers (57). Moreover, phosphorylation of Ser26 in the turn region of Aβ destabilizes the hairpin conformation (23), whereas constraint of Asp23 and Lys28 by a lactam bridge stabilizes the hairpin and enhances the aggregation rate (22). There is thus substantial evidence that formation and stabilization of the β-hairpin is important for self-assembly of Aβ. The results here together suggest that a salt bridge-stabilized β-hairpin is also a critical motif for medin to adopt a stable fibrillar conformation.
CONCLUSION
Although D25N is not a known physiological mutant in AMA pathology, this work helps us to understand the mechanism by which medin aggregates. Results presented here highlight the similarities between medin and Aβ and emphasize that in addition to the cross-β structure, amyloid proteins can share additional structural motifs that can drive the aggregation pathway. These common motifs may provide information that can be targeted for future diagnostic and therapeutic development.
Acknowledgments
We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamline B23 (SM8120), which contributed to the results presented here. We thank Giuliano Siligardi and the team at Diamond for guidance with CD measurements and Dinu Iuga (University of Warwick) for assistance with the 850-MHz solid-state NMR. We also thank Dr. Helen Wright for assistance with the immunoblot analysis.
This work was supported by British Heart Foundation Grants FS/09/033/27742 and FS/12/61/29877. The UK 850 MHz Solid-State NMR Facility is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, and the University of Warwick, including funding through Birmingham Science City Advanced Materials Projects 1 and 2 supported by Advantage West Midlands and the European Regional Development Fund.
- AMA
- aortic medial amyloid
- ThT
- thioflavin T
- DARR
- dipolar assisted rotational resonance
- FSR
- frequency-selective rotational echo double resonance
- TEM
- transmission electron microscopy.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sipe J. D., Benson M. D., Buxbaum J. N., Ikeda S., Merlini G., Saraiva M. J. M., Westermark P. (2014) Nomenclature 2014: amyloid fibril proteins and clinical classification of the amyloidosis. Amyloid 21, 221–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Harrison R. S., Sharpe P. C., Singh Y., Fairlie D. P. (2007) in Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology (Amara S. G., Bamberg E., Fleischmann B., Gudermann T., Hebert S. C., Jahn R., Lederer W. J., Lill R., Miyajima A., Offermanns S., Zechner R., eds) pp. 1–77, Springer, Berlin: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Reches M., Gazit E. (2004) Amyloidogenic hexapeptide fragment of medin: homology to functional amyloid polypeptide fragments. Amyloid 11, 81–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Larsson A., Söderberg L., Westermark G. T., Sletten K., Engström U., Tjernberg L. O., Näslund J., Westermark P. (2007) Unwinding fibril formation of medin, the peptide of the most common form of human amyloid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 361, 822–828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Davies H. A., Madine J., Middleton D. A. (2012) Solid-state NMR reveals differences in the packing arrangements of peptide aggregates derived from the aortic amyloid polypeptide medin. J. Pept. Sci. 18, 65–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Madine J., Copland A., Serpell L. C., Middleton D. A. (2009) Cross-β spine architecture of fibrils formed by the amyloidogenic segment NFGSVQFV of medin from solid-state NMR and x-ray fiber diffraction measurements. Biochemistry 48, 3089–3099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ma B., Nussinov R. (2006) Simulations as analytical tools to understand protein aggregation and predict amyloid conformation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 445–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tu L.-H., Raleigh D. P. (2013) The role of aromatic interactions in amyloid formation by islet amyloid polypeptide. Biochemistry 52, 333–342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Petkova A. T., Ishii Y., Balbach J. J., Antzutkin O. N., Leapman R. D., Delaglio F., Tycko R. (2002) A structural model for Alzheimer's β-amyloid fibrils based on experimental constraints from solid state NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 16742–16747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Paravastu A. K., Leapman R. D., Yau W. M., Tycko R. (2008) Molecular structural basis for polymorphism in Alzheimer's β-amyloid fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18349–18354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gu L., Guo Z. (2013) Alzheimer's Aβ42 and Aβ40 peptides form interlaced amyloid fibrils. J. Neurochem. 126, 305–311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gu L., Liu C., Guo Z. (2013) Structural insights into Aβ42 oligomers using site-directed spin labeling. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 18673–18683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Belitzky A., Melamed-Book N., Weiss A., Raviv U. (2011) The dynamic nature of amyloid β(1–40) aggregation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 13809–13814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Takahashi T., Mihara H. (2012) FRET detection of amyloid β-peptide oligomerization using a fluorescent protein probe presenting a pseudo-amyloid structure. Chem. Commun. 48, 1568–1570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Häggqvist B., Näslund J., Sletten K., Westermark G. T., Mucchiano G., Tjernberg L. O., Nordstedt C., Engström U., Westermark P. (1999) Medin: An integral fragment of aortic smooth muscle cell-produced lactadherin forms the most common human amyloid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 8669–8674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Peng S., Larsson A., Wassberg E., Gerwins P., Thelin S., Fu X., Westermark P. (2007) Role of aggregated medin in the pathogenesis of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Lab. Invest. 87, 1195–1205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Peng S., Glennert J., Westermark P. (2005) Medin-amyloid: a recently characterized age-associated arterial amyloid form affects mainly arteries in the upper part of the body. Amyloid 12, 96–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fawzi N. L., Phillips A. H., Ruscio J. Z., Doucleff M., Wemmer D. E., Head-Gordon T. (2008) Structure and dynamics of the Aβ(21–30) peptide from the interplay of NMR experiments and molecular simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6145–6158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Petkova A. T., Yau W.-M., Tycko R. (2006) Experimental constraints on quaternary structure in Alzheimer's β-amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry 45, 498–512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cruz L., Rao J. S., Teplow D. B., Urbanc B. (2012) Dynamics of metastable β-hairpin structures in the folding nucleus of amyloid β-protein. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 6311–6325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Berhanu W. M., Hansmann U. H. E. (2012) Structure and dynamics of amyloid-β segmental polymorphisms. PLoS One 7, e41479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sciarretta K. L., Gordon D. J., Petkova A. T., Tycko R., Meredith S. C. (2005) Aβ40-Lactam (D23/K28) models a conformation highly favorable for amyloid nucleation. Biochemistry 44, 6003–6014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rezaei-Ghaleh N., Amininasab M., Giller K., Kumar S., Stündl A., Schneider A., Becker S., Walter J., Zweckstetter M. (2014) Turn plasticity distinguishes different modes of amyloid-β aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4913–4919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Levy E., Prelli F., Frangione B. (2006) Studies on the first described Alzheimer's disease amyloid β mutant, the Dutch variant. J. Alzheimers Dis. 9, 329–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nilsberth C., Westlind-Danielsson A., Eckman C. B., Condron M. M., Axelman K., Forsell C., Stenh C., Luthman J., Teplow D. B., Younkin S. G., Näslund J., Lannfelt L. (2001) The “Arctic” APP mutation (E693G) causes Alzheimer's disease by enhanced Ab protofibril formation. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 887–893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tomiyama T., Nagata T., Shimada H., Teraoka R., Fukushima A., Kanemitsu H., Takuma H., Kuwano R., Imagawa M., Ataka S., Wada Y., Yoshioka E., Nishizaki T., Watanabe Y., Mori H. (2008) A new amyloid β variant favoring oligomerization in Alzheimer's-type dementia. Ann. Neurol. 63, 377–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Van Nostrand W. E., Melchor J. P., Cho H. S., Greenberg S. M., Rebeck G. W. (2001) Pathogenic effects of D23N Iowa mutant amyloid β-protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32860–32866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tagliavini F., Rossi G., Padovani A., Magoni M., Andora G., Sgarzi M., Bizzi A., Savoiardo M., Carella F., Morbin M., Giaccone G., Bugiani O. (1999) A new βPP mutation related to hereditary cerebral haemorrhage. Alzheimers Rep. 2, S28 [Google Scholar]
- 29. Huang X. Q., Miller W. (1991) A time-efficient, linear-space local similarity algorithm. Adv. Appl. Math. 12, 337–357 [Google Scholar]
- 30. Davies H. A., Wilkinson M. C., Gibson R. P., Middleton D. A. (2014) Expression and purification of the aortic amyloid polypeptide medin. Protein Expr. Purif. 98, 32–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chiu J., March P. E., Lee R., Tillett D. (2004) Site-directed, ligase-independent mutagenesis (SLIM): a single-tube methodology approaching 100% efficiency in 4 h. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Alvarez-Martinez M. T., Fontes P., Zomosa-Signoret V., Arnaud J. D., Hingant E., Pujo-Menjouet L., Liautard J. P. (2011) Dynamics of polymerization shed light on the mechanisms that lead to multiple amyloid structures of the prion protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1814, 1305–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. van Stokkum I. H. M., Spoelder H. J. W., Bloemendal M., van Grondelle R., Groen F. C. A. (1990) Estimation of protein secondary structure and error analysis from CD spectra. Anal. Biochem. 191, 110–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sreerama N., Woody R. W. (2000) Estimation of protein secondary structure from CD spectra: comparison of CONTIN, SELCON, and CDSSTR methods with an expanded reference set. Anal. Biochem. 287, 252–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Manavalan P., Johnson W. C., Jr. (1987) Variable selection method improves the prediction of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra. Anal. Biochem. 167, 76–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dusa A., Kaylor J., Edridge S., Bodner N., Hong D.-P., Fink A. L. (2006) Characterization of oligomers during α-synuclein aggregation using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. Biochemistry 45, 2752–2760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bennett A. E., Rienstra C. M., Auger M., Lakshmi K. V., Griffin R. G. (1995) Heteronuclear decoupling in rotating solids. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 6951–6958 [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jaroniec C. P., Tounge B. A., Herzfeld J., Griffin R. G. (2001) Measurement of dipolar couplings in a uniformly 13C,15N labeled membrane protein: distances between the Schiff base and aspartic acids in the active site of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3507–3519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang Y., Jardetzky O. (2002) Probability-based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical-shift data. Protein Sci. 11, 852–861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Han B., Liu Y., Ginzinger S. W., Wishart D. S. (2011) SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction. J. Biomol. NMR 50, 43–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ahmed M., Davis J., Aucoin D., Sato T., Ahuja S., Aimoto S., Elliott J. I., Van Nostrand W. E., Smith S. O. (2010) Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-β(1–42) oligomers to fibrils. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 561–567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fändrich M. (2012) Oligomeric intermediates in amyloid formation: structure determination and mechanisms of toxicity. J. Mol. Biol. 421, 427–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kayed R., Head E., Sarsoza F., Saing T., Cotman C. W., Necula M., Margol L., Wu J., Breydo L., Thompson J. L., Rasool S., Gurlo T., Butler P., Glabe C. G. (2007) Fibril specific, conformation dependent antibodies recognize a generic epitope common to amyloid fibrils and fibrillar oligomers that is absent in prefibrillar oligomers. Mol. Neurodegener. 2, 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Glabe C. G. (2008) Structural classification of toxic amyloid oligomers. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 29639–29643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Haupt C., Leppert J., Rönicke R., Meinhardt J., Yadav J. K., Ramachandran R., Ohlenschläger O., Reymann K. G., Görlach M., Fändrich M. (2012) Structural basis of β-amyloid-dependent synaptic dysfunctions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 1576–1579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Madine J., Middleton D. A. (2010) Comparison of aggregation enhancement and inhibition as strategies for reducing the cytotoxicity of the aortic amyloid polypeptide medin. Eur. Biophys. J. 39, 1281–1288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Khurana R., Gillespie J. R., Talapatra A., Minert L. J., Ionescu-Zanetti C., Millett I., Fink A. L. (2001) Partially folded intermediates as critical precursors of light chain amyloid fibrils and amorphous aggregates. Biochemistry 40, 3525–3535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Barlow D. J., Thornton J. M. (1983) Ion-pairs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 168, 867–885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Tycko R. (2011) Solid-state NMR studies of amyloid fibril structure. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 62, 279–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Jayaraman M., Kodali R., Sahoo B., Thakur A. K., Mayasundari A., Mishra R., Peterson C. B., Wetzel R. (2012) Kinetically competing huntingtin aggregation pathways control amyloid polymorphism and properties. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 881–899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Patke S., Srinivasan S., Maheshwari R., Srivastava S. K., Aguilera J. J., Colón W., Kane R. S. (2013) Characterization of the oligomerization and aggregation of human serum amyloid A. PLoS One 8, e64974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bram Y., Frydman-Marom A., Yanai I., Gilead S., Shaltiel-Karyo R., Amdursky N., Gazit E. (2014) Apoptosis induced by islet amyloid polypeptide soluble oligomers is neutralized by diabetes-associated specific antibodies. Sci. Rep. 4, 4267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lashuel H. A., Hartley D. M., Petre B. M., Wall J. S., Simon M. N., Walz T., Lansbury P. T., Jr. (2003) Mixtures of wild-type and a pathogenic (E22G) form of Aβ40 in vitro accumulate protofibrils, including amyloid pores. J. Mol. Biol. 332, 795–808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Caughey B., Lansbury P. T. (2003) Protofibrils, pores, fibrils, and neurodegeneration: separating the responsible protein aggregates from the innocent bystanders. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 267–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ding T. T., Lee S. J., Rochet J. C., Lansbury P. T., Jr. (2002) Annular α-synuclein protofibrils are produced when spherical protofibrils are incubated in solution or bound to brain-derived membranes. Biochemistry 41, 10209–10217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kodali R., Wetzel R. (2007) Polymorphism in the intermediates and products of amyloid assembly. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 48–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Izuo N., Murakami K., Sato M., Iwasaki M., Izumi Y., Shimizu T., Akaike A., Irie K., Kume T. (2013) Non-toxic conformer of amyloid β may suppress amyloid β-induced toxicity in rat primary neurons: implications for a novel therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 438, 1–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]