Abstract
Previous evidence suggests that emotion dysregulation may have different biological correlates between adults and children/adolescents. Although the role of genetic factors has been extensively studied in adult-onset emotion dysregulation, the genetic basis for pediatric-onset emotion dysregulation remains elusive. The current review article presents a summary of previous studies that have suggested a few genetic variants associated with pediatric emotion dysregulation. Among these candidate loci, many prior studies have been focused on serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism 5-HTTLPR. Certain alleles of the 5-HTTLPR gene polymorphism have been found to be associated with traits associated with emotion dysregulation, such as aggression, affect reactivity, and insecure attachment. Additionally, genetic variants involving dopamine and neurophysiological biomarkers like the COMT Val158Met (rs460) and dopamine receptor D2/ ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing one polymorphisms may play a role in emotion dysregulation. Inconsistent findings have been noted, possibly due to the heterogeneity in study designs and characteristics of different populations. Further research on the role of genetic predetermination of emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents is warranted.
Keywords: Gene, Emotion regulation, Adolescents, Children, 5-HTTLPR polymorphism
Core tip: Genetic correlates involved in emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents remain rather understudied compared to adult populations, despite the strong impact emotion dysregulation can have on an individual and societal functioning. This paper covers the key genetic variants involved in pediatric emotion dysregulation, with a special emphasis on the serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism 5-HTTLPR typically associated with aggression, affect reactivity, and emotion dysregulation. This review places emphasis on the necessity for further research in this field of study in order to better understand biological mechanisms underlying emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents, and also highlight current avenues of study worthy of further investigation.
INTRODUCTION
Emotion dysregulation results from a failure to control, evaluate, and modify an emotional response to a stimulus, in particular the timing and severity of emotion, which often impacts externalizing behaviors[1]. In children and adolescents, emotion dysregulation can be considered the outcome of the tendency to respond emotionally to a stimulus combined with the ability to most successfully modulate the response[2]. These processes include conscious and subconscious mechanisms based in underlying genetic and neurophysiological entities. With the advances of high-throughput and high-resolution genomic technologies, research on the genetic basis of mood dysregulation has been increasing and empowering researchers to better understand how and why this dysregulation occurs in children and adolescents. Prior evidence has suggested that pediatric-onset form and adult-onset form of bipolar disorder, which is characterized by emotion dysregulation, may have distinct genetic predispositions and clinical outcomes[3,4]. The purpose of this review is to summarize current genetics research findings within pediatric populations on emotion dysregulation and point out the need of more research to improved our understanding of genetic factors for pediatric emotional dysregulation. Unraveling age-dependent genetic mechanisms underlying emotion dysregulation will provide an initial step towards personalized medicines for mood disorders in children and adolescents. Although the body of research on genetic basis of pediatric-onset emotion dysregulation is limited compared to genetics research on emotion dysregulation in adults, several candidate genes have been consistently shown to be linked to emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents.
RESEARCH STUDY
A literature search with the key words related to genetic of emotion dysregulation in pediatric populations was conducted to gather information for this review article. Our query algorithm implemented in PubMed was as follows: required keywords were present in either “Abstract” or “Title” included (1) gene; (2) children or adolescents; and (3) emotion or mood followed by regulation, reactivity, or arousal. Additionally, only human-based studies with English as the language were extracted. Certain parts of research from this review were selected and modified from a lecture written for Continuing Medical Education to Go for Physicians. A total of 19 studies were retrieved. Selected studies related to the genetics of pediatric emotion dysregulation are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Genetic neural correlates | |
5-HTTLPR low-expressing allele carriers | |
Pacheco et al[13] | Reduced white matter connectivity/density in uncinate fasciculus |
Spangler et al[16] | Increased risk for development of disorganized attachment pattern |
Gotlib et al[21] | Prolonged cortisol activity after a stressor |
COMT Val156Met(rs460) Met Allele Carriers | |
Boettinger et al[27] | Greater emotion dysregulation associated with dopaminergic systems |
Waugh et al[24] | |
Egan et al[25] | |
Tunbridge et al[26] | |
DRD2/ANKK1 Polymorphism | |
Althaus et al[28] | 5-HTTLPR S allele may predispose to (performance) anxiety, while DRD2 Taq1 A allele may predispose to the reward deficiency syndrome. |
SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER GENE 5-HTTLPR POLYMORPHISM
The serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) and a polymorphic serotonin-transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) determine the quantity and duration of serotonin synaptic signaling during neurotransmission[5]. There are three important variants of 5-HTTLPR alleles: the short (S) allele, the long-rs25531(G) (La) allele, and the long-rs25531(A) (La) allele. The short (S) allele and the long-rs25531(G) (Lg) allele carriers[6] compared to the long-rs25531(A) (La) allele variant carriers, have lower mRNA transcriptions of the serotonin transporter. Individuals without an La allele are found to produce approximately 50% less mRNA than individuals carrying homozygous La alleles[7]. This polymorphism has been shown to correlate with the severity of affect reactivity and mood dysregulation[8]. A meta-analysis of a serotonin transporter genotype and the activity of amygdala, a brain region modulating emotion regulation, reports that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism accounts for 10% of the variance of amygdala activation[9]. Furthermore, the S allele has been shown to correlate with heightened amygdala activation in response to a broad range of emotional stimuli[9,10]. In a study of 82 children and adolescents, individuals carrying either S or Lg allele were found to have more than two times the risk of aggressive behavior than individuals carrying at least one La allele[5]. Borderline personality disorder, which is characterized by emotion instability, is also found to be associated with the short allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism[11]. Another study on 91 adolescents reported that the effect of the short allele of 5-HTTLPR on aggressive behaviors might be modified by attachment[12]. These findings suggest that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism plays a role in emotion regulation, while environmental factors may also moderate its effect on mood symptoms and associated behaviors. More research is needed to validate these findings to have a better understanding of the role of this polymorphism in emotion regulation.
The 5-HTTLPR polymorphism may also affect the cortical-limbic circuit critical for emotion regulation[13]. Diffusion MRI examining the uncinate fasciculus, a white matter pathway that connects medial and orbitofrontal prefrontal cortexes to amygdala, in 37 female adolescents and adults and found the number of short alleles at 5-HTTLPR inversely correlate with the fractional anisotropy (FA) values at white matter microarchitecture, especially in the left frontal region of the uncinate fasciculus. Uncinate fasciculus is a region believed to be the impetus behind the heightened amygdala reactivity and poorer functional coupling of amygdala and prefrontal cortex associated with emotion regulation abilities[13]. In addition, age is positively correlated with FA values in the bilateral frontal regions of the uncinate fasciculus-which is consistent with data showing the increase in prefrontal activity and thereby emotion regulation due to myelination and development of prefrontal cortex during adolescence and adulthood[13,14]. To date, there is no published evidence for the same phenomenon in males. Children carrying homozygous S alleles in the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism are also found to have greater activity of amygdala during visual processing of emotionally negative stimuli that mimics a transient depressed state than their peers carrying homozygous L alleles[15].
Social and environmental adversity may also notably impact neuronal gene expressions (i.e., epigenetic phenomena). Carriers of the S allele of 5-HTTLPR polymorphism have an increased risk for developing disorganized attachment patterns in comparison to homozygous L genotypes, while maternal responsiveness mediated the effect and acted as a type of safeguard against disordered attachment genetic predisposition[16]. The study reveals that adolescents carrying the S allele show a greater emotional reactivity in response to restrictions of autonomy (defined as one’s own goals as a method of self-regulation), compared with others carrying no S alleles[12]. Another study found that childhood emotional abuse significantly moderated the relationship between genotype and the likelihood of quitting the behavioral indicator of resiliency to distress[17], which is a validated game-like test designed to generate frustration and encourage the player to quit[8]. Adolescents with one long (L) and one short (S) variant of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and poor family relations had a 12-14 time increased risk for high alcohol intoxication frequency[18]. If family relations were poor, the SS genotype had higher alcohol consumption than the LL genotype. The investigators suggest a possible heterosis, or increased functioning of the hybrid genotype, in cases in which the environment is unfavorable to adaptive functioning. The investigators did not, however, distinguish between high- and low-expressing L alleles, which may have contributed greatly to overall findings. Gerra et al[19] found a significantly positive association of S-allele-carrier genotypes with irritability levels and related temperamental traits in adolescents. One large longitudinal study examined 4334 seven-year-old children and found no significant relationships between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and emotional symptoms in children, but those in the 5-HTTLPR low expression group demonstrated an increase in the risk for emotional symptoms when faced with minimal to moderate stress[20]. These findings suggest that environmental effects need to be taken into account in elucidate the role of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in pediatric emotion dysregulation.
The S and the low-expressing L allele may also have a negative impact on stress reactivity and tolerance due to their positive correlations with prolonged cortisol secretion following a stressor[21]. Even though the bulk of research on the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and related factors in children and adolescents is considered preliminary, serotonin-related mechanisms have paved the way for novel treatment modalities relating to other biological systems that may have an impact on serotonin levels. For example, recent research on omega-3 fatty acids has been linked to a depletion in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) during early development, which may cause lower levels of serotonin and thereby incite a series of deleterious effects of mood dysregulation and stress reactivity, among other symptoms[22]. While SSRIs have been used to treat mood dysregulation in children and adolescents for several years now, management of DHA and EPA levels is a novel therapeutic option. Learning more about mechanisms of serotonin regulation and manipulation within the brain can facilitate the development of more effective medication and treatment plans.
OTHER GENETIC POLMORPHISMS IMPLICATED IN EMOTION DYSREGULATION
While the bulk of pediatric research on genetic factors involved in emotion dysregulation focuses on serotonin, a number of other loci may also have an impact. A functional single-nucleotide polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene encodes a valine to methionine mutation at position 158 (Val158Met) rs4680 in the enzyme that degrades dopamine[23]. The Val variant has higher activity of catabolizing dopamine than the Met variant. Prior evidence has shown that the COMT Met allele is associated with more severe emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents[24-26]. One study on 277 children and adolescents found that the Val allele carriers were more likely become irritable when their expected rewards are delayed, compared to their peers carrying no Val alleles[27]. These results suggest that the role of COMT (Val158Met) polymorphisms in mood regulation may be complicated, as the relationship between dopaminergic tone and mood regulation may be non-linear.
The dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2)/ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing one polymorphism are other genetic variants associated with D2 dopamine receptor binding affinity that may also play a role in emotion dysregulation[28]. In a study of 65 children, the DRD2 Taq A1 allele was found to be associated with a greater sensitivity and emotionality to negative feedback, while simultaneously diminishing one’s sensitivity to positive feedback[28]. The same study also found that children with the short allele (S) for the 5-HTTLPR gene might show greater sensitivity to error processing in event-related potential experiments. Significantly enhanced early error-related negativity and later occurring error-related positivity were associated with the S-allele group compared to the homozygous L-allele group; such electrophysiological signals are thought to reflect the anterior cingulate activity[28].
Other genetic variants associated with mood dysregulation have been reported by preclinical and clinical studies primarily focused on adults. The role of these variants in pediatric mood dysregulation also deserves some attention. For example, adult carriers of the monoamine oxidase-A (MAOA) promoter variant associated with a lower gene expression may have a higher propensity for aggression and impulsivity, compared with carriers of the MAOA promoter variant associated with a higher gene expression[29,30]. Individuals with low-expression MAOA variant may have reduced left middle frontal gyrus activation and left amygdala and posterior thalamic activation in response to an anger trigger, compared to the control[31].
Another genetic variant that may be of importance involves the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (CRTC1), a CREB protein coactivator of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) implicated in rodent models of depression[32]. One fMRI study of children found that a single nucleotide polymorphism (T/C) near the CREB gene might be associated with neural correlate for emotion reactivity-greater activation in the TT group, compared to the CC group, in the right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, right putamen, right caudate nucleus and left anterior temporal pole, when the brain activity under a transient state of sadness[33]. Mice lacking the coactivator have a series of negative traits, including impulsive aggressiveness, social withdrawal, and increased emotional response to stressful events[34]. Mice without the CRTC1 gene also demonstrate a reduced efficiency in serotonin and dopamine cycling in prefrontal cortex, as well as a decreased expression of susceptibility genes involved with neuroplasticity, including BDNF, providing a strong suggestion that the coactivator might play an important role in gene expression related to mood disorders. The L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel, alpha 1C subunit (CACNA1C) gene[35,36] is linked to mood disorders from different populations. The calcium channel may also be linked to the arousal system[37,38]. The calcium influx in the arousal system is modulated by glutamate[39] and Υ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)[40]. The relationship between glutamate metabolism genes and mood disorders may be difficult to determine partly because such genes may be expressed in different brain regions. Research in these areas is essential to further understanding of psychiatric symptom etiology in children and adolescents.
DISCUSSION
There has been significant emerging evidence for the contribution of genetic variants to pediatric emotion dysregulation, thanks to the advances of genomic technologies. However, most of these genetic findings are challenged with the failure of replication across different populations, and hence genetic determinants of emotion dysregulation remain elusive. Inconsistent findings might continue to be a norm rather than an exception without taking into consideration the factors, such as genetic heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity, and epigenetic phenomena associated with environmental influences. Current knowledge of genetic mechanisms underlying emotion regulation has been primarily based on research on adults, and hence more efforts to study the genetic basis for emotion regulation in children and adolescents are warranted. Some genetic variants (e.g., COMT polymorphisms) have been found to exert paradoxical effects on emotion dysregulation in children, which may be partly attributable to a non-linear relationship between variants and neurochemical changes and environmental influences (e.g., attachment). Additionally, the developing brain in the youth may further complicate genomic studies, as phenotypic features may fluctuate by age. For example, age-dependent changes in neural substrates related empathy have been observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorders or typically-developing individuals[41]. Additionally, autonomic arousal was uniquely heightened in adolescents[42]. Furthermore, activities of prefrontal regions in response to emotions are also age-dependent[43]. Finally, there are various psychological tasks related to emotion regulation associated with different brain circuits, and hence literature searches may be limited due to the heterogeneous contexts and terminologies. Nevertheless, the genetic component of emotion dysregulation constitutes an initial step of understanding the etiology of emotion dysregulation, but knowledge of hereditary and hormonal influences may yield robust improvements in pharmacological and therapeutic treatments that can benefit children and adolescents in managing dysfunctional emotional behaviors.
Footnotes
P- Reviewer: Kravos M, Müller MJ, Serafini G S- Editor: Tian YL L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ
Supported by Oxley Foundation (Lin PI and Barzman D); Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training (Barzman D); and American Physician Institute (Geise C).
Conflict-of-interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Peer-review started: August 26, 2014
First decision: September 16, 2014
Article in press: February 9, 2015
References
- 1.Thompson RA. Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59:25–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dennis TA, Hajcak G. The late positive potential: a neurophysiological marker for emotion regulation in children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50:1373–1383. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02168.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin PI, McInnis MG, Potash JB, Willour VL, Mackinnon DF, Miao K, Depaulo JR, Zandi PP. Assessment of the effect of age at onset on linkage to bipolar disorder: evidence on chromosomes 18p and 21q. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:545–555. doi: 10.1086/491602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin PI, McInnis MG, Potash JB, Willour V, MacKinnon DF, DePaulo JR, Zandi PP. Clinical correlates and familial aggregation of age at onset in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:240–246. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beitchman JH, Baldassarra L, Mik H, De Luca V, King N, Bender D, Ehtesham S, Kennedy JL. Serotonin transporter polymorphisms and persistent, pervasive childhood aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1103–1105. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.6.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hu XZ, Lipsky RH, Zhu G, Akhtar LA, Taubman J, Greenberg BD, Xu K, Arnold PD, Richter MA, Kennedy JL, et al. Serotonin transporter promoter gain-of-function genotypes are linked to obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:815–826. doi: 10.1086/503850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Müller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science. 1996;274:1527–1531. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5292.1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Amstadter AB, Daughters SB, Macpherson L, Reynolds EK, Danielson CK, Wang F, Potenza MN, Gelernter J, Lejuez CW. Genetic associations with performance on a behavioral measure of distress intolerance. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Munafò MR, Brown SM, Hariri AR. Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and amygdala activation: a meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:852–857. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hariri AR, Mattay VS, Tessitore A, Kolachana B, Fera F, Goldman D, Egan MF, Weinberger DR. Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science. 2002;297:400–403. doi: 10.1126/science.1071829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hankin BL, Barrocas AL, Jenness J, Oppenheimer CW, Badanes LS, Abela JR, Young J, Smolen A. Association between 5-HTTLPR and Borderline Personality Disorder Traits among Youth. Front Psychiatry. 2011;2:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zimmermann P, Mohr C, Spangler G. Genetic and attachment influences on adolescents’ regulation of autonomy and aggressiveness. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50:1339–1347. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pacheco J, Beevers CG, Benavides C, McGeary J, Stice E, Schnyer DM. Frontal-limbic white matter pathway associations with the serotonin transporter gene promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism. J Neurosci. 2009;29:6229–6233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0896-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barnea-Goraly N, Menon V, Eckert M, Tamm L, Bammer R, Karchemskiy A, Dant CC, Reiss AL. White matter development during childhood and adolescence: a cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging study. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1848–1854. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fortier E, Noreau A, Lepore F, Boivin M, Pérusse D, Rouleau GA, Beauregard M. Early influence of the rs4675690 on the neural substrates of sadness. J Affect Disord. 2011;135:336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Spangler G, Johann M, Ronai Z, Zimmermann P. Genetic and environmental influence on attachment disorganization. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50:952–961. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lejuez CW, Kahler CW, Brown RA. A modified computer version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based stressor: implications for behavioral assessment. The Behavior Therapist. 2006;26:290e3. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nilsson KW, Sjöberg RL, Damberg M, Alm PO, Ohrvik J, Leppert J, Lindström L, Oreland L. Role of the serotonin transporter gene and family function in adolescent alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:564–570. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000159112.98941.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gerra G, Garofano L, Zaimovic A, Moi G, Branchi B, Bussandri M, Brambilla F, Donnini C. Association of the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism with smoking behavior among adolescents. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005;135B:73–78. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Araya R, Hu X, Heron J, Enoch MA, Evans J, Lewis G, Nutt D, Goldman D. Effects of stressful life events, maternal depression and 5-HTTLPR genotype on emotional symptoms in pre-adolescent children. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009;150B:670–682. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gotlib IH, Joormann J, Minor KL, Hallmayer J. HPA axis reactivity: a mechanism underlying the associations among 5-HTTLPR, stress, and depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:847–851. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hibbeln JR, Ferguson TA, Blasbalg TL. Omega-3 fatty acid deficiencies in neurodevelopment, aggression and autonomic dysregulation: opportunities for intervention. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2006;18:107–118. doi: 10.1080/09540260600582967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Männistö PT, Kaakkola S. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy of the new selective COMT inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:593–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Waugh CE, Dearing KF, Joormann J, Gotlib IH. Association between the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism and self-perceived social acceptance in adolescent girls. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2009;19:395–401. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.0141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Callicott JH, Mazzanti CM, Straub RE, Goldman D, Weinberger DR. Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6917–6922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111134598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tunbridge EM, Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR. Catechol-o-methyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis: Val158Met and beyond. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boettiger CA, Mitchell JM, Tavares VC, Robertson M, Joslyn G, D’Esposito M, Fields HL. Immediate reward bias in humans: fronto-parietal networks and a role for the catechol-O-methyltransferase 158(Val/Val) genotype. J Neurosci. 2007;27:14383–14391. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2551-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Althaus M, Groen Y, Wijers AA, Mulder LJ, Minderaa RB, Kema IP, Dijck JD, Hartman CA, Hoekstra PJ. Differential effects of 5-HTTLPR and DRD2/ANKK1 polymorphisms on electrocortical measures of error and feedback processing in children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang YY, Cate SP, Battistuzzi C, Oquendo MA, Brent D, Mann JJ. An association between a functional polymorphism in the monoamine oxidase a gene promoter, impulsive traits and early abuse experiences. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1498–1505. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF. A regulatory polymorphism of the monoamine oxidase-A gene may be associated with variability in aggression, impulsivity, and central nervous system serotonergic responsivity. Psychiatry Res. 2000;95:9–23. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00162-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Alia-Klein N, Goldstein RZ, Tomasi D, Woicik PA, Moeller SJ, Williams B, Craig IW, Telang F, Biegon A, Wang GJ, et al. Neural mechanisms of anger regulation as a function of genetic risk for violence. Emotion. 2009;9:385–396. doi: 10.1037/a0015904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blendy JA. The role of CREB in depression and antidepressant treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:1144–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fortier E, Noreau A, Lepore F, Boivin M, Pérusse D, Rouleau GA, Beauregard M. Early impact of 5-HTTLPR polymorphism on the neural correlates of sadness. Neurosci Lett. 2010;485:261–265. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Breuillaud L, Rossetti C, Meylan EM, Mérinat C, Halfon O, Magistretti PJ, Cardinaux JR. Deletion of CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 induces pathological aggression, depression-related behaviors, and neuroplasticity genes dysregulation in mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72:528–536. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Casamassima F, Huang J, Fava M, Sachs GS, Smoller JW, Cassano GB, Lattanzi L, Fagerness J, Stange JP, Perlis RH. Phenotypic effects of a bipolar liability gene among individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010;153B:303–309. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kloiber S, Czamara D, Karbalai N, Müller-Myhsok B, Hennings J, Holsboer F, Lucae S. ANK3 and CACNA1C--missing genetic link for bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder in two German case-control samples. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:973–979. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kohlmeier KA, Inoue T, Leonard CS. Hypocretin/orexin peptide signaling in the ascending arousal system: elevation of intracellular calcium in the mouse dorsal raphe and laterodorsal tegmentum. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:221–235. doi: 10.1152/jn.00076.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kraus RL, Li Y, Gregan Y, Gotter AL, Uebele VN, Fox SV, Doran SM, Barrow JC, Yang ZQ, Reger TS, et al. In vitro characterization of T-type calcium channel antagonist TTA-A2 and in vivo effects on arousal in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;335:409–417. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.171058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Joiner ML, Lisé MF, Yuen EY, Kam AY, Zhang M, Hall DD, Malik ZA, Qian H, Chen Y, Ulrich JD, et al. Assembly of a beta2-adrenergic receptor--GluR1 signalling complex for localized cAMP signalling. EMBO J. 2010;29:482–495. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Léna C, Changeux JP. Role of Ca2+ ions in nicotinic facilitation of GABA release in mouse thalamus. J Neurosci. 1997;17:576–585. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-02-00576.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schulte-Rüther M, Greimel E, Piefke M, Kamp-Becker I, Remschmidt H, Fink GR, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K. Age-dependent changes in the neural substrates of empathy in autism spectrum disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9:1118–1126. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Somerville LH, Jones RM, Ruberry EJ, Dyke JP, Glover G, Casey BJ. The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:1554–1562. doi: 10.1177/0956797613475633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hoshi Y, Chen SJ. Regional cerebral blood flow changes associated with emotions in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2002;27:275–281. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(02)00432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]