Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Mar 23;5:9366. doi: 10.1038/srep09366

Polarization conversion from a thin cavity array in the microwave regime

B Tremain 1,a, H J Rance 1, A P Hibbins 1, J R Sambles 1
PMCID: PMC4369744  PMID: 25797210

Abstract

Linearly polarized microwave radiation is shown to have its plane of polarization converted to the orthogonal state upon reflection from an ultrathin (λ/25) cavity array. The structure benefits from an uncomplicated design consisting of a metallic grating closely separated from a ground plane by a dielectric spacer. A single set of periodically spaced slits (monograting) exhibits polarization conversion when the normally incident electric field is aligned at 45° to the slits. Two orthogonal sets of slits (bigrating) allows this narrow-band effect to be broadened when the two orthogonal resonances are separated in frequency. We optimise the design and experimentally demonstrate near loss-less polarization conversion (95% of the incident intensity) across a 3.1 GHz frequency band. Finally, we study the dependence of the structure's performance on incident angle and slit width.

The ability to polarize and to manipulate the polarization state of electromagnetic radiation has been an essential tool ever since the wave nature of light was first understood. One such manipulation is the ability to rotate the polarization of linearly polarized radiation as it reflects or transmits through a structure. This is achieved via birefringence. Linear birefringence occurs in materials where orthogonal (x and y) components of electromagnetic radiation experience different refractive indices, in devices such as half- or quarter-waveplates that convert linearly polarized radiation into 90° rotated linear or circular polarizations respectively. Linearly birefringent structures possess anisotropy and hence their performance depends on their azimuthal orientation with respect to the incoming polarization. In contrast, circular birefringent materials possess different refractive indices for right (RCP) and left (LCP) circularly polarised radiation. This provides the potential to rotate linearly polarised radiation to any desired angle provided no circular dichroism, a differential absorption for LCP and RCP waves, is present.

Circular birefringence and dichroism are two manifestations of optical activity, which is exhibited by natural chiral media such as sugar solution. However, the degree of polarization rotation attainable through these structures is normally small and hence research in artificial chiral metamaterials1,2,3 (CMM), arrays of subwavelength chiral ‘meta-molecules', has received substantial interest. Collections of 3D (e.g. helical) elements have yielded circular polarizers and linear polarization rotators in transmission4,5,6. Planar 2D CMMs7, mounted onto a substrate, have been shown to rotate linear polarization8,9,10,11 despite having extremely subwavelength thicknesses. This rotation effect has been enhanced by using bilayers of chiral metamolecules12,13,14,15,16,17, layers of nonchiral meta-molecules rotated with respect to each other18,19,20,21,22,23, or via oblique incidence illumination of a nonchiral anisotropic planar metamaterial24.

Numerous structures have been used to achieve 90° polarization conversion via linear birefringence. Diffraction gratings are capable of linear conversion upon reflection25,26,27, and the bandwidth can be broadened by the excitation of bound surface modes28,29.This has been experimentally demonstrated in both the microwave30 and visible31,32,33,34 domains of the electromagnetic spectrum. More recently, the field of metamaterials has led to a similar result; polarization conversion upon reflection, using much thinner arrays of bianisotropic metallic elements above a ground plane. These geometries include elliptical patches in the visible regime35, dielectric cut-wire arrays37 and ‘L'-shaped holes36 in the infra-red, metallic cut-wires at terahertz frequencies38, and split-rings39,40 and ‘I' shaped wires41,42 in the microwave regime.

The underlying principle behind these structures, namely linear birefringence, is the same for the work we present in this study. However we demonstrate that a similar polarization conversion can be realised using a much simpler structure consisting of two orthogonal arrays of narrow slits in a metal sheet separated from a ground plane by a dielectric layer. This design would be beneficial when scaled to higher frequency regimes where fabrication is more difficult. Unlike relief gratings, polarization conversion from this array is a resonant effect associated with the dielectric cavity. Crucially, we use a very low-loss dielectric and optimise the geometry in order to minimize Joule heating resulting in less than 2% absorption. We design the structure so that the frequency of the cavity resonances results in a 3.1 GHz band across which 95% of incident radiation is converted. Finally, we study the effect of both incident angle and slit width on the polarization conversion and study the polarization state for all frequencies in the vicinity of the resonances.

The metamaterial studied consists of a perforated metallic layer separated from a ground plane by a dielectric. Initially, the upper surface contains a single set of continuous, sub-wavelength, parallel slits (referred to here as a monograting and shown schematically in Fig. 1a. Resonant microwave absorption occurs because electric field polarized parallel to the grating vector can diffract and excite lateral resonances within the dielectric cavities between adjacent slits43,44. At the fundamental resonant frequency the time-averaged electric field magnitude is maximum along the edge of the metallic strips due to a build up of charge. In the dielectric layer a standing wave is formed with field maxima at either side of the slit region and minima in the centre of each metallic strip and below the centre of the slit. This can be seen in Fig. 2 which shows, on resonance, the time-averaged electric field magnitude and the electric field vector of one unit cell of the structure across a plane perpendicular to the slit. Due to a rapid change of phase as the field diffracts through the slit, the structure resonates at a much lower frequency than expected due to the unit cell size, as explained in Ref. 44. Adding a second set of slits in the orthogonal direction, creating a bigrating (Fig. 1b), provides the structure with a second resonance. When the electric field is polarized at 45° to both sets of slits, the coupling efficiencies of the incident radiation to these resonances are equal. In this work we show how the cavity structure can be used as a polarization converting mirror. This is achieved by delaying the phase of one orthogonal component of the reflected electric field with respect to the other in much the same way as a half-wave plate. This phase delay is a frequency dependent quantity that is dictated by the cavity resonance(s).

Figure 1. Sample geometry and coordinate system for (a) the monograting cavity array with period λg and slit width ws and (b) the bigrating cavity array with periodicity λgx and λgy in the x and y directions respectively.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Figure 2. A cross-section of a single unit cell of a typical monograting structure perpendicular to the slit at the fundamental resonant frequency.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The metallic sections are shown as bordered white regions. (a) Resonant time-averaged electric field magnitude where black to white represents increasing field strength. (b) Resonant electric field vector at a phase corresponding to maximum field enhancement, showing both the quantisation and reversal of the field beneath the metallic strip.

Schematics of the two experimental structures studied are shown in Fig. 1. The samples have a dielectric thickness tD = 0.787 mm and metal thickness tM = 0.018 mm. This metal thickness is much greater than the penetration depth of copper at microwave frequencies and therefore the metal is considered to be a perfect electrical conductor. The upper layer of the monograting sample has a period of λg = 3.78 mm and slit width ws = 0.125 mm and the dielectric, FR4, has the complex permittivity ε = 4.4 + i0.088. The bigrating sample has a short period in the x-direction of λgx = 3.2 mm and a long period in the y direction of λgy = 4.7 mm, with a slit width in both dimensions of ws = 0.17 mm. The dielectric used is Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 with ε = 2.2 + i0.002. This material is chosen as it has a smaller imaginary part to its permittivity than FR4 and hence absorbs little power.

Results and Discussion

Reflected intensity (reflectivity) spectra have been obtained for polarization angles of ϕ = 0°, 45°, 90°. For each of these incident polarizations both the polarization conserved and converted responses have been measured. In addition, co-polarized phase measurements are shown for ϕ = 0°, 90° as well as the ellipticity, γ, and handedness of the reflected radiation as a function of frequency. The experimental results are compared to finite element method modelling.

Monograting

Fig. 3a shows the normal-incidence reflectivity spectra for the monograting sample. The first subscript represents the polarization angle ϕ of the incident electric field and the second defines the respective orientation of the detecting antenna. The polarization converted reflectivity along the mirror planes of the sample (R0,90 and R90,0) have been omitted as there is no polarization conversion unless the symmetry of the surface is broken.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Reflectivity as a function of frequency for the monograting sample. Co-polarized reflectivity for polarization angles of 0° (blue squares), 90° (purple triangles) and 45° (red circles) and cross-polarized reflectivity at ϕ = 45° (hollow yellow circles). (b) Relative phase of detected radiation as a function of frequency, normalized to the phase of reflection from a planar metallic mirror. (c) Ellipticity of reflected radiation, where negative and positive values indicate left and right handed respectively. Results from numerical modelling are shown as dotted lines.

R90,90 shows that when the electric field is polarized parallel to the slits and along the y-direction, no radiation couples into the cavity. Instead, all radiation within the frequency range is reflected as if from a mirror and no features are present. This is supported by Fig. 3b which shows the phase of reflected radiation, normalized to that of a planar mirror. Ψ90,90 shows no difference between the responses from the structure and the mirror and it reflects with a phase change δΨy = π at all frequencies within the range.

The co-polarized reflectivity when the electric field is polarized perpendicular to the slits (x-direction), R0,0, shows a minimum at 11.2 GHz as the electric field diffracts through the slits and excites a lateral Fabry-Perot-like resonance in the dielectric cavity beneath, where ~35% of the incident power is absorbed. The corresponding phase measurement displays the characteristic change in phase through the resonance when normalized to the reflected phase of a planar mirror. At the resonant frequency of 11.2 GHz, the phase of reflection from the monograting Ψ0,0 is π out of phase with that from the mirror, indicating that at this frequency, the total change in phase upon reflection is δΨx = 0, 2π. Away from the resonance, beyond the limits of the figure, the phase of reflected radiation returns to that of the mirror hence δΨx = ±π.

When the incident radiation is polarized at ϕ = 45° to the slits, the electric field can be decomposed into equal components in the x and y directions such that, assuming no losses,

graphic file with name srep09366-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep09366-m2.jpg

Hence, at 11.2 GHz, half of the incident power is reflected from the upper surface with a phase change δΨy = π and the other half diffracts into the resonant cavity mode which subsequently reradiates with a δΨx = 2π phase change. Due to the phase difference δΨx − δΨy = π between these processes, the combined reflected field is polarized perpendicular to the incident field as portrayed in Fig. 4. The result of this is that a peak is observed in the cross-polarized reflectivity signal R45,-45. This power is no longer detected in the co-polarized state and hence a minimum is observed in R45,45. Due to loss in the dielectric, the peak in polarization conversion cannot reach 100%. Selecting a dielectric material with a smaller imaginary part of its permittivity would minimize loss and maximize the polarization conversion, hence the switch from FR4 to Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 for the bigrating sample discussed in the next section. The phase difference δΨx − δΨy is frequency dependent and away from the resonance the reflected polarization state is elliptically polarized. Fig. 3c shows the ellipticity, γ, of the reflected wave as a function of frequency, where the ellipticity is defined as the ratio of the semi-minor to semi-major axis of the polarization ellipse. Positive and negative values indicate right and left handed polarization respectively. Hence, at 10.3 GHz and 12.4 GHz, where δΨx − δΨy = 3π/2, π/2, the reflected radiation is circularly polarized, with left and right handedness respectively. This polarization state assumes a linearly polarized incident beam with ϕ = 45°. An incident polarization of ϕ = −45° would cause the reflection to have the opposite handedness.

Figure 4. Schematic diagram showing the incident and reflected polarization states at the resonant frequency of 11.2 GHz when the electric field is polarized at 45° to the grating slits.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The response of the structure to circularly polarized incident light can be determined by decomposing the electric field into the x and y directions. We can therefore infer the circular polarization conversion (not shown) from the reflected amplitude and phase of linear polarization. At the resonant frequency of the structure, circularly polarized light is reflected with the opposite handedness, where the handedness is defined in relation to the direction of propagation. Furthermore, at 10.3 GHz and 12.4 GHz, where δΨx − δΨy = 3π/2, π/2, the structure now acts as a circular to linear converter.

Bigrating

Now we consider the bigrating cavity array in order to broaden the frequency range over which polarization conversion can be achieved. Fig. 5a shows the reflectivity as a function of frequency for the bigrating structure. The upper metal surface now contains periodic slits in both the x and y directions and hence cavity resonances can be excited in both directions. It has been shown that when the pitches of these perpendicular slits are equal, λgx = λgy, a polarization independent cavity resonance exists and there is no polarization conversion due to the four-fold rotational symmetry of the structure45. If the pitches are not equal, the two orthogonal resonances separate in frequency and polarization conversion is possible provided the electric field is not polarized along a mirror plane of the surface. The bigrating sample is designed to minimize absorption in the dielectric cavity such that the resonant dips in reflectivity cannot be clearly resolved. Hence, the reflectivity data R0,0 and R90,90 are omitted although the phase data in Fig. 5b shows two resonant features centred at 13.5 GHz and 17.4 GHz.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Co-polarized (filled red circles) and cross-polarized (hollow yellow circles) reflectivity for ϕ = 45°. (b) Relative phase of co-polarized detected radiation as a function of frequency, normalized to the phase of reflection from a planar metallic mirror, for 0° (blue squares), 90° (purple triangles) and their difference (green circles) (c) Ellipticity of reflected radiation, where negative and positive values indicate left and right handed respectively. Results from numerical modelling are shown as dotted lines.

When the incident electric field is polarized at 45° to both sets of slits, two peaks in polarization conversion arise, labelled with arrows in Fig. 5a. For this particular geometry, the two resonance frequencies are sufficiently separated such that the minimum between the two peaks is minimized in R45,-45. There exists a 2.5 GHz frequency band where 98% of incident radiation is reflected with the othogonal polarization and the remaining 2% is absorbed. This bandwidth increases to 3.1 GHz over which 95% of the radiation is converted, indicated by the gray region in Fig. 5. The phase and ellipticity data presented in Fig. 5b–c shows that the phase difference between the x and y components of the reflected electric field, Ψ0,0 − Ψ90,90, is approximately equal to π over the same frequency range, causing linear polarization conversion. As before, circularly polarized radiation would be reflected from this structure with the opposite handedness, where the handedness is defined in relation to the direction of propagation.

Slit width

Fig. 6 shows how the bandwidth and central frequency of the polarization converting band varies with slit width ws according to numerical modelling. The data points corresponding to the sample studied thus far are shown as triangles. The resonant frequency of each cavity depends not just on cavity volume but also on this separation between cavities. This is because a narrower slit results in a steeper field gradient beneath the slit as the incident field diffracts. The field undergoes a π/2 phase change over a distance of the order of the slit width which leads to an effective lengthening of the cavity44. The central frequency data (black circles) shown in Fig. 6 show how the polarization conversion band decreases in frequency as the slit is narrowed. This trend is very similar to that reported in Ref. 44 for the transmission resonance of a structured slit. The 95% conversion bandwidth (grey squares) also decreases with decreasing slit width. The range of slit widths between 0.06 and 1.5 mm were chosen as outside of this range the conversion is reduced below 95% at the central frequency. This data shows how the central frequency and the bandwidth of operation can be tailored by making a small variation to the design of the bigrating.

Figure 6. The bandwidth (grey squares) and central frequency (black circles) of the 95% polarization converting band for various slit widths ws.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The values corresponding to the bigrating sample are shown as triangles.

Incident angle

In Fig. 7 the numerically modelled cross-polarized reflectivity is presented as a function of frequency and incident angle θ. The 95% conversion band remains up to an angle of 30°, where the bandwidth has increased to 3.55 GHz whilst the central frequency has shifted up to 15.9 GHz from 15.3 GHz. Beyond 30°, the amplitudes of both conversion peaks reduces and they move further up in frequency.

Figure 7. Cross-polarized reflectivity of the bigrating sample with incident polarization angle ϕ = 45°, as a function of both frequency and incident angle θ.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Linear to circular conversion

Just as this bigrating structure acts as a reflecting half wave plate, it is also possible to achieve a reflecting quarter wave plate (to convert between linear and circular polarization) by separating the two orthogonal resonances further. Numerical modelling for the bigrating array but now with a short period of λgx = 5.4 mm and a long period of λgy = 2.05 mm is shown in Fig. 8. Between 14.5 and 17 GHz, both the co-polarized, R45,45, and the cross-polarized, R45,-45, reflectivity is ~0.5, hence the reflected signal must be circularly polarized. This is verified by the phase and ellipticity data in Fig. 8b–c. Ψ0,0 − Ψ90,90 shows that the difference in phase between the reflected x and y components of the electric field is equal to 3π/2.

Figure 8. Numerical modelling results for the linear to circular polarization converting bigrating structure.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Co-polarized (dashed red line) and cross-polarized (solid yellow line) reflectivity for ϕ = 45°. (b) Relative phase of reflected radiation as a function of frequency, normalized to the phase of reflection from a planar metallic mirror, along the x direction (dot-dash), y direction (dashed) and their difference (dotted). (c) Ellipticity of reflected radiation, where negative and positive values indicate left and right handed respectively.

Conclusion

In this paper, a metamaterial consisting of a grating separated from a ground plane by a low-loss dielectric has been experimentally optimised for polarization conversion in reflection. The result is a 95% polarization converting mirror for normally incident microwave radiation with its electric field polarized at 45° to the two orthogonal gratings. Using a rectangular bigrating as the upper surface of the array allows an increase of the operating bandwidth to 3.1 GHz centred at 15.3 GHz. This structure benefits from an uncomplicated geometry which could be scaled to higher frequency regimes. It is very thin (λ/25) and the unit cell size is also subwavelength (λ/4). Most importantly, the absorption is very small (2%) meaning less incident power is lost upon reflection than previous designs35,36,37,38,39,41,42. Numerical modelling has shown that the polarization conversion performance is maintained for incident angles up to 30° and that the central frequency and bandwidth of operation can be varied by changing the slit width. Further modelling shows that by changing the dimensions of the cavity array it can also function as a linear to circular polarization converter across the same frequency range.

Methods

Fabrication

Both the monograting and the bigrating samples were produced using standard lithographic etching of a 400 mm × 600 mm double-sided printed circuit board.

Experiment

Microwave radiation is emitted from a narrow-band horn antenna and is collimated using a parabolic mirror into a ~ 300 mm diameter beam which illuminates the sample with an approximate plane wave at close to normal incidence (θ < 3°). The same mirror refocuses the reflected beam to the detecting horn placed adjacent to the source. The sample itself is rotated to vary the polarization angle, ϕ, and the detector is rotated with respect to the source to measure either the co-polarized or cross-polarized signal.

Modelling

Finite element method modelling was performed using Ansoft HFSS. Master/slave boundary conditions were used to reduce the dimensionality of the structure to that of a single unit cell and a Floquet Port excitation was placed 12 mm above the upper metal surface. A solution was obtained for a frequency of 30 GHz and a frequency sweep used to produce the results shown in this paper.

Author Contributions

B.T. obtained experimental data and conducted numerical modelling. H.J.R. initiated sample fabrication and assisted with experimental techniques. A.P.H. and J.R.S. directed the research. All authors helped to analyse the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of DSTL. A.P.H. and J.R.S. also acknowledge the support of EPSRC through the QUEST programme grant.

References

  1. Li Z., Mutlu M. & Ozbay E. Chiral metamaterials: from optical activity and negative refractive index to asymmetric transmission. J. Opt. 15, 023001 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang B., Zhou J., Koschny T., Kafesaki M. & Soukoulis C. Chiral metamaterials: simulations and experiments. J. Opt. 11, 114003 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. Schaferling M., Dregely D., Hentschel M. & Giessen H. Tailoring Enhanced Optical Chirality: Design Principles for Chiral Plasmonic Nanostructures. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031010 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. Gansel J. K. et al. Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer. Science. 325, 1513–1515 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brewitt-Taylor C. R., Lederer P. G., Smith F. C. & Haq S. Measurement and prediction of helix-loaded chiral composites. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 47, 692700 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  6. Helgert C. et al. Chiral metamaterial composed of three-dimensional plasmonic nanostructures. Nano Lett. 11, 4400–4404 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Menzel C., Rockstuhl C., Paul T. & Lederer F. Retrieving effective parameters for quasiplanar chiral metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 233106 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuwata-Gonokami M. et al. Giant Optical Activity in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Planar Nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 227401 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bai B., Svirko Y., Turunen J. & Vallius T. Optical activity in planar chiral metamaterials: Theoretical study. Phys. Rev. A 76, 023811 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Jia Y.-P. et al. Complementary chiral metasurface with strong broadband optical activity and enhanced transmission. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 011108 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. Prosvirnin S. L. & Zheludev N. I. Analysis of polarization transformations by a planar chiral array of complex-shaped particles. J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 074002 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  12. Decker M., Klein M. W., Wegener M. & Linden S. Circular dichroism of planar chiral magnetic metamaterials. Opt. Lett. 32, 856 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Plum E., Fedotov V. A., Schwanecke A. S., Zheludev N. I. & Chen Y. Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 223113 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Plum E. et al. Metamaterial with negative index due to chirality. Phys. Rev. B 79, 035407 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. Ye Y. & He S. 90 Polarization Rotator Using a Bilayered Chiral Metamaterial With Giant Optical Activity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 203501 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Kwon D.-H., Werner P. L. & Werner D. H. Optical planar chiral metamaterial designs for strong circular dichroism and polarization rotation. Opt. Express 16, 11802 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rogacheva A. V., Fedotov V. A., Schwanecke A. S. & Zheludev N. I. Giant Gyrotropy due to Electromagnetic-Field Coupling in a Bilayered Chiral Structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177401 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Decker M. et al. Strong optical activity from twisted-cross photonic metamaterials. Opt. Lett. 34, 2501–2503 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Decker M., Zhao R., Soukoulis C. M., Linden S. & Wegener M. Twisted split-ring-resonator photonic metamaterial with huge optical activity. Opt. Lett. 35, 1593–1595 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiong X. et al. Construction of a chiral metamaterial with a U-shaped resonator assembly. Phys. Rev. B 81, 075119 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  21. Shi J. et al. Dual-band asymmetric transmission of linear polarization in bilayered chiral metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 191905 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Hannam K., Powell D. A., Shadrivov I. V. & Kivshar Y. S. Dispersionless optical activity in metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 201121 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu N., Liu H., Zhu S. & Giessen H. Stereometamaterials. Nat. Photonics 3, 157162 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  24. Plum E., Fedotov V. A. & Zheludev N. I. Optical activity in extrinsically chiral metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 191911 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Inchaussandague M. & Depine R. Polarization conversion from diffraction gratings made of uniaxial crystals. Phys. Rev. E 54, 2899–2911 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Depine R. A. & Gigli M. L. Conversion between polarization states at the sinusoidal boundary of a uniaxial crystal. Phys. Rev. B 49, 8437–8445 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsai C.-C. & Wu S.-T. Study of broadband polarization conversion with metallic surface-relief gratings by rigorous coupled-wave analysis. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 1339–1348 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Elston S., Bryan-Brown G. & Sambles J. R. Polarization conversion from diffraction gratings. Phys. Rev. B. 44, 6393–6400 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Feng L., Mizrahi A., Zamek S., Liu Z., Lomakin V. & Fainman Y. Metamaterials for enhanced polarization conversion in plasmonic excitation. ACS Nano. 5, 5100–5106 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hallam B. T., Lawrence C. R., Hooper I. R. & Sambles J. R. Broad-band polarization conversion from a finite periodic structure in the microwave regime. App. Phys. Lett. 84, 849–851 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  31. Watts R. & Sambles J. R. Polarization conversion from blazed diffraction gratings. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 1231–1241 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  32. Hooper I. R. & Sambles J. R. Broadband polarization-converting mirror for the visible region of the spectrum. Opt. Lett. 27, 2152–2154 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Seshadri S. R. Polarization conversion by reflection in a thin-film grating. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 18, 1765–1776 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Passilly N. et al. Polarization conversion by dielectric sub-wavelength gratings in conical mounting. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. 3, 08009 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang F., Chakrabarty A., Minkowski F., Sun K. & Wei Q. Polarization conversion with elliptical patch nanoantennas. App. Phys. Lett. 101, 023101 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  36. Li T., Wang S. M., Cao J. X., Liu H. & Zhu S. N. Cavity-involved plasmonic metamaterial for optical polarization conversion. App. Phys. Lett. 97, 261113 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang Y. et al. Dielectric meta-reflectarray for broadband linear polarization conversion and optical vortex generation. Nano Lett. 14, 1394–1399 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grady N. K. et al. Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction. Science 340, 1304–1307 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zheng H. Y. et al. Reflective metamaterial polarization converter in a broad frequency range. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 64, 822825 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  40. Chin J. Y., Lu M. & Cui T. J. Metamaterial polarizers by electric-field-coupled resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 251903 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  41. Hao J. et al. Manipulating Electromagnetic Wave Polarizations by Anisotropic Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 063908 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ma H. F., Wang G. Z., Kong G. S. & Cui T. J. Broadband circular and linear polarization conversions realized by thin birefringent reflective metasurfaces. Opt. Mater. Express 4, 1717–1724 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  43. Hibbins A. P., Lawrence C. R., Brown J. R. & Sambles J. R. Squeezing millimeter waves into microns. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143904 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lockyear M. J., Hibbins A. P. & Sambles J. R. Transmission of microwaves through a stepped subwavelength slit. App. Phys. Lett. 91, 251106 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  45. Brown J. R., Hibbins A. P., Lockyear M. J., Lawrence C. R. & Sambles J. R. Angle-independent microwave absorption by ultrathin microcavity arrays. J. App. Phys. 104, 043105 (2008). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES