Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2015 Mar;15(1):197–205. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.26

Prevalence and immediate outcome of candida colonized preterm neonates admitted to Special Care Unit of Mulago Hospital, Kampala Uganda

Yaser Abdallah 1, Deogratias Kaddu-Mulindwa 2,+, Jolly Nankunda 1, Philippa M Musoke 1
PMCID: PMC4370134  PMID: 25834549

Abstract

Background

Candida species is the third commonest cause of sepsis among neonates. Colonization by Candida is a predictor for candidemia among preterm neonates.

Objectives

To determine prevalence of early Candida colonization and early outcome among colonized preterm neonates admitted to Mulago hospital Special Care Unit.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort was conducted between December 2008 and April 2009. Preterm neonates aged >72 hours and less than one week were screened for Candida colonization of the groin, oral pharynx and rectum using CHROMagar. Colonized neonates were followed up for 14 days. Blood cultures were done for those with signs of septicaemia.

The Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression were conducted for factors associated with colonization and mortality among colonized neonates. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant and confidence interval of 95% was used.

Results

Candida colonization occurred in 50/213 (23.5%) neonates. Gestational age ≤ 30 weeks was the only factor independently associated with colonization (p = 0.005). Of the colonized 14/46 (30.4%) died and 13/46 (28.3%) developed mucocutaneous candidiasis. No candidemia was identified. Multiple site colonization was independently associated with mortality (p=0.035).

Conclusion

The consequence of high colonization observed in this study needs to be further elucidated in Uganda.

Keywords: Preterm neonates, Candida colonization, Candidemia

Introduction

The majority of global neonatal deaths take place in low income countries2 with the leading causes being prematurity (28%) and infections (26%)2,3. In Uganda infections and preterm births account for 31% and 25% of all neonatal deaths respectively4,5. Although Candida species exist as commensals on the skin, oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract, invasive candidiasis79 may occur among preterm neonates due to immaturity of their immune system6,7.

Surveys from some parts of the world have revealed an increase in occurrence of invasive candidiasis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) especially among preterm neonates810 with outbreaks reported from some NICUs11. Studies have found that 7–20% of all Candida colonized preterm neonates develop invasive candidiasis1215 and the most important predictor for invasive candidiasis in neonates is colonization by Candida10,13,16. Invasive candidiasis is associated with substantial morbidity as well as a high attributable mortality rate (range, 30–75%)16.

Early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis is challenging hence the shifting of the focus to prevention. Two different Cochrane reviews analyzing antifungal prophylaxis using oral/topical nystatin/miconazole and systemic fluconazole among very low birth weight neonates have demonstrated a reduction in invasive fungal disease among infants receiving anti-fungal prophylaxis 17,18.

In this paper, we describe Candida colonization and candidemia in preterm neonates. Since there was no data on the prevalence and outcome of Candida colonization of preterm neonates in our settings, our study findings will provide guidance for care of preterm neonates in Uganda and other low resource settings.

Methods

Study Site: This study was conducted at the Special Care Unit (SCU) in Mulago hospital. Mulago hospital is a national referral hospital for Uganda and a teaching hospital for Makerere University. The SCU is where newborn babies who require specialized care are admitted. The unit admits over 2000 low birth weight babies per year with a 35% mortality among low birth weight babies . The unit has preterm, full term and Kangaroo Mother Care sections.

Most invasive procedures are not carried out in the unit and the available maximum respiratory support is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). The unit is over crowded with most incubators shared by 2 to 3 preterm neonates.

Preterm neonates are discharged from SCU once they are tolerating oral feeds, gaining weight and maintaining stable body temperature while in Kangaroo care irrespective of their weight or gestational age. A Kangaroo clinic runs in the unit twice a week. Discharged neonates are followed up from this clinic till they attain a weight of 2500g.

Study design and sample size

This was a prospective observational cohort study. Sample size for prevalence using Kish Leslie method was used since prevalence of Candida colonization was the primary objective. Because no such study had been conducted in Uganda; results from a study in India that found 15.5% preterm neonates colonized by day 3 of life15 was used in estimating sample size and assuming: Z-Standard normal value corresponding to 95% confidence interval (1.96)

D-Absolute errors between the estimated and true value= 0.05 (5%). P- The prevalence of Candida colonization of (15.5%) after 72 hours of life. n = Z2 P (1-P) / D2n = 1.962 × 0.155(1–0.155) / 0.052 n (Sample size required) = 201

Assuming 6% loss to follow up: Final sample size = 213 Procedures: Eligible neonates were those < 37weeks of gestational age who were > 72 hours and < 7 days old. Gestational ages were determined using New Ballard Score (NBS) performed within 24 hours of admission.

Mothers of eligible neonates were identified; detailed explanation given and written consent obtained prior to enrolment. Neonates born to mothers who had been on antifungal agents in the last month of pregnancy were excluded. Enrolled neonates were given study numbers and data captured using pre-coded case report forms.

The study staff used sterile swabs to collect specimens from the groin, oral pharynx and rectum by gently rubbing without prior use of antiseptic. Different swabs were used for each site. The swabs were placed in Amies transport medium, labeled with participants study number and site of collection and transported to the laboratory immediately. Specimens were inoculated on CHROMagar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks MD) and incubated at 37°C. Agar plates were examined at the microbiology laboratory (Department of Microbiology Makerere University) for growth at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Candida albicans was identified using CHROMagar while for non albicans fermentation of sugars (Glucose, Sucrose, Lactose, Maltose and Urase) was used.

Colonized neonates were followed-up for two weeks at the SCU and for those discharged earlier as outpatients. Parents to neonates discharged before laboratory results were back were traced in the follow-up clinic on their scheduled visit.

During the follow-up neonates were examined for oral or perianal thrush and for signs suggestive of septicaemia by World Health Organization criteria1. Neonates with oral thrush received nystatin suspension and clotrimazole cream for those with diaper rash.

Blood was collected under aseptic technique from neonates with signs of septicaemia, placed in blood culture bottles with Brain heart infusion agar and transported to laboratory for Candida and bacterial isolation.

Data management and analysis: Data from case report forms was entered into EPI DATA package 3.1 then exported into STATA version 10 for analysis. Univariate analysis was conducted for continuous variables (gestation ages, birth weight and mothers' ages) and results summarized as mean, median and standard deviations.

Continuous variables were categorized and then analyzed using Fisher's exact test to determine association with Candida colonization. Factors with p value ≤ 0.2 in the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model to determine factors independently associated with colonization. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant and confidence interval of 95% was used.

Ethical approval: Approval to carry out this study was granted by the Research and Ethics Committee of Makerere University Medical School.

Results

Over a five months period (December 2008 to April 2009), 213 preterm neonates were enrolled in the study. Four study participants were discharged early and lost to follow up. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of study participants. The mean gestational age and birth weight of the study participants were 31.6 weeks (SD 2.3) and 1469 gms (SD 303) respectively. Forty (18.8%) of the study participants were small for gestational age. All participants received intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin prophylactically; 92% received continuous positive airway pressure and 32% received intravenous aminophylline. Breast milk feeds were initiated in 93% of the study participants prior to enrollment. Two (2) participants received ibuprofen for patent ductus ateriosus and none received surfactant or parenteral lipids. No participant underwent central venous catheterization or intubation and none had commenced kangaroo care prior to enrollment.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the 213 study participants at admission.

Variables Frequency
(213)
Percentage
(%)
Sex
Male 101 47.7
Female 112 52.3
Place of birth
Mulago 138 64.8
Other health facility 52 24.4
Home 23 10.8
Mode of delivery
Vaginal 174 82.0
Caeserian section 39 18.0
HIV exposure
Not exposed 175 82.2
Exposed 38 17.8
Gestation Age
31–36 weeks 150 70.4
≤30 weeks 63 29.6
Birth weights
≤1500 grams 126 59.2
> 1500 grams 87 40.8
Axillary temperature (°C)
< 36.5 207 97.0
≥36.5 6 3.0
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)
< 60 167 78.4
≥ 60 46 21.6
Pulse rate (beats/min)
≥ 120 194 91.1
< 120 19 8.9

Baseline characteristics were taken at admission

Baseline characteristics were taken at admission

The mean age of the mothers involved in the study was 24 years (SD 5.5). Thirty six mothers (18.8 %) were HIV positive, eight were on HAART and 19 (53%) were on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis only. No mother had received antenatal steroids or antifungal treatment in the last month of pregnancy. Seventy eight percent of mothers reported using herbs all of which were taken orally and no mother reported use of herbs per vagina. Table 2 shows Candida species and sites of colonization. Fifty (23.5%) of the 213 enrolled preterm neonates were colonized. The rectum was the most colonized site. Eighteen (36%) neonates had colonization of more than one site and two had all the three sites colonized. Four of the colonized neonates had more than one species of Candida.

Table 2.

Candida species and sites of colonization

Organisms n=70 (%) Oral n = 6 Groin n = 29 Rectal n = 35
Candida albicans 28 (40%) 2 12 14
Candida krusei 21 (30%) 0 10 11
Candida glabrata 13 (18.6) 2 6 5
Candida tropicalis 2 (2.9%) 0 1 1
Unidentified 6 (8.5%) 2 0 4

Four of the colonized preterm neonates had more than one species of Candida, 2 had krusei + albicans, 1 had glabrata + albicans and 1 had glabrata + tropic

Table 3 shows association between baseline characteristics, interventions and early Candida colonization. No association was found between interventions received prior to enrollment and colonization. From multiple regression analysis gestational age ≤ 30 weeks was significantly associated with colonization (p= 0.005). During follow-up, 13/46 (28%) of the colonized neonates developed mucocutaneous candidiasis (oral +/- diaper) occurring between day 6 and 12 of life. Nine (20%) of the colonized neonates developed clinical sepsis, seven had confirmed bacterial septicaemia; Klebsiella pneumonia (5), Eschericia coli (1) and Serratia marcescens (1) while two had no isolated organisms. Candidemia was not found among these neonates. Both neonates who had clinical septicaemia with negative blood cultures had more than one site colonized and one neonate developed mucocutaneous candidiasis.

Table 3.

Association between baseline characteristics, interventions and early Candida colonization

Variables Candida colonization OR p-value
No (N=163) Yes (N=50) (95% CI)
Sex
Male 78 (47.8%) 23 (46%) 0.93 0.818
Female 85 (52.2%) 27 (54%) (0.46–1.84)
Place of birth
Mulago 108 (66.3%) 30 (60%) 1.00 0.444
Other health facility 36 (22%) 16 (32%) (0.30–3.30)
Home 19 (11.7%) 4 (8%)
Mode of delivery
Vaginal 131 (80.4%) 43 (86%) 1.50 0.411
Caesarian section 32 (82.0%) 7 (14%) (0.50–4.30)
HIV exposure
Not exposed 130 (80.0%) 45 (90%) 0.43 0.138
Exposed 33 (20.0%) 5 (10%) (0.13–1.23)
Gestational age
31–36 weeks 123 (81.0%) 27 (54%) 2.60 0.004
≤ 30 weeks 40 (19.0%) 23 (46%) (1.20–5.30)
Birth weight
≤ 1500grams 90 (55.2%) 36 (72%) 2.08 0.047
> 1500grams 73 (44.8%) 14 (28%) (1.00–4.50)
Duration of rupture of
Membranes
< 24 hours 125(77.0%) 38 (76%) 1.03 0.920
≥ 24 hours 38 (23.0%) 12 (24%) (0.44–2.28)
Oral Suction*
No 148 (91.0%) 48 (96%) 0.41 0.371
Yes 15(9.0%) 2 (4%) (0.04–1.87)
CPAP
No 151(92.7%) 46 (92%) 1.09 1.000
Yes 12(7.3%) 4 (8%) (0.24–3.84)
Initiation of breast milk
Yes 155(95.1%) 45 (90%) 2.15 0.190
No 8(4.9%) 5 (10%) (0.52–7.86)
Small for gestational age
Yes 32 (19.6%) 8 (16.0%) 0.82 0.773
No 131 (80.4%) 42 (84.0%) (0.42–1.64)

Variable COR*
(95% CI)
p-value AOR*
(95% CI)
p-value

Gestational age 2.619 0.004 2.60 0.005
≤ 30 weeks (1.27– 5.33) (1.33–5.10)
HIV exposure 0.437 0.138 0.45 0.116
(0.13–1.23) (0.16–1.22)
Not Initiated on
Breast milk
2.153 0.190 1.04 0.994
(0.52–7.86) (0.3–3.5)
*

Preterm neonates delivered from other health facilities; if suction was not mentioned then it was assumed not done.

COR* Crude Odds ratio, AOR* Adjusted Odds Ratio

Out of 46 colonized neonates 14 (30%) died. Eight died from septicaemia, four from suspected necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and two from aspiration of feeds. All neonates who died from suspected NEC had Candida rectal colonization, three had more than one site colonized, and two of them had mucocutaneous candidiasis. All neonates who died from suspected NEC, deteriorated following rapid progression of suspected NEC, no blood for cultures were obtained and parents declined postmortem. Table 4 shows factors associated with mortality among Candida colonized neonates. There was no association between Candida species responsible for colonization with occurrence of mucocutaneous candidiasis, bacterial septicaemia or death. On logistic regression association between multiple sites of Candida colonization and mortality remained statistically significant p=0.035 although the numbers were small.

Table 4.

Bivariate and multivariate analysis of Factors associated with mortality among Candida colonized preterm neonates.

Variable N=46 (%) COR * p-value
Died
(N=14)
Alive
(N=32)
(95% CI)
Sites colonized
> 1 site 9(64.3%) 7(22%) 6.4 0.0084
1 site 5(35.7%) 25(78%) (1.34–32.15)
Mucocutaneous
Candidiasis
Yes 2(14.3%) 11(34.4%) 0.32 0.286
No 12(85.7%) 21(65.6%) (0.03–1.89)
Bacterial septicaemia
Yes 6(43%) 1(3.1%) 23.0 0.0019
No 8(57%) 31(96.9%) (2.14–1102)
Gestation age
≤30 weeks 12(85.7%) 10(31.3%) 13.2 0.001
31–36weeks 2 (14.3%) 22(68.7%) (2.17–134.5)
C. Albican colonization*
Yes 8(61.5%) 13(46.6%) 1.84 0.505
No 5(38.5%) 15(53.6%) (0.40–8.99)
C. Krusei colonization*
Yes 4(31%) 13(46.4%) 0.51 0.498
No 9(69%) 15 (53.6%) (0.094–2.44)
C. Non-albican & non-krusei*
Yes 2(15.4%) 3(10.7%) 1.51 0.645
No 11(84.6%) 25(89.3%) (0.11–15.1)

Variable COR*
(95%CI)
p-value AOR*
(95% CI)
p-value

> 1 site colonized 6.242 0.0084 6.41 0.035
(1.34–32.1) (1.143–36.0)
Gestation age ≤ 30weeks 13.2 0.001 7.07 0.044
(2.17–134.5) (1.057–47.3)
Bacterial septicaemia 23 0.0019 9.4 0.08

COR* Denotes Crude Odds Ratio, AOR* denotes Adjusted Odds Ratio

4 preterm neonates were lost to follow up.

2 preterm neonates who were lost to follow up had >1 site colonized.

*

5 of the colonized preterm neonates had species that were not identified; they were excluded from analysis for association between Candida species colonized with and outcome

Discussion

The prevalence of Candida colonization observed of 23.5% is comparable to 26.2% that was observed by Mandiratta et al in India during the first week of life15 but higher than those observed in other centers1921. Our prevalence might actually be an under estimation since we did not screen for colonization prior to 72 hours of life yet studies we are comparing with screened study subjects from the first 24 hours of life. Although other studies did not describe the day to day activities of their units, SCU is small, overcrowded with sharing of incubators and mothers are involved in the nursing care. These factors can potentiate person to person transmission of Candida since horizontal transmission has been shown to be an equally important route of Candida acquisition22,23.

Gestational age ≤ 30 weeks was the only factor independently associated with Candida colonization (p=0.005). This finding is similar to the findings from other studies15,20,21. The association of Candida colonization and lower gestational age is partly due to prematurity being associated with compromised immunity6,7. The other explanation for this association may lie in the excessive handling that preterm neonates inevitably undergo while in neonatal units that promotes horizontal acquisition23. There was no association observed between small for gestational age study participants and Candida colonization (p=0.82), no other studies that we came across looked at small for gestational age and colonization. Our study finding is contrary to knowledge that these neonates are susceptible to infections due to some degree of immunosuppression24. One possible explanation for lack of association may be that the small for gestational age neonates tend to be stable hence have less frequent handling and therefore lower risk of horizontal acquisition of Candida.

In our study the odds of being colonized with Candida when a neonate was delivered vaginally was 1.5 fold higher than by caesarian section, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.411). Findings from other studies demonstrated vaginal delivery as being associated with Candida colonization15,21,23. The lack of statistical significance found in our study may be attributed to Prolonged Rupture of Membranes (PROM) ≥24 hours which occurred in 41% of the mothers who delivered by caesarian section and because we did not screen for colonization within first 24 hours, some of the admitted neonates who died at less than 72 hours of age might have been colonized.

After controlling for PROM, the association of colonization and vaginal delivery was not statistically significant (p=0.389). This supports the possibility that Candida colonization identified after 72 hours of life is more likely acquired from the environment22,23.

PROM for ≥ 24 hours has been associated with ascending infections and neonatal septicaemia. In this study there was no association between PROM and Candida colonization (p= 1.000). This finding correlates with findings from other studies20,21 but contrary to findings by Mandiratta et al which found a significant association (p=<0.05)(15). Although they didn't specify hours of rupture of membranes, Mandiratta et al screened mothers for Candida vaginal colonization and found 29.8% of mothers were colonized with some isolated species resembling those responsible for neonatal colonization. Maternal HIV has been associated with higher vaginal Candida colonization especially as the mothers' immunological state deteriorates25. The association between HIV exposure and Candida colonization was not statistically significant (p = 0.138) even after controlling for mode of delivery (p=0.124). The possible explanation is that most of the HIV infected mothers were receiving HIV care and possibly their immunological status were good hence less carriage of Candida.

Interventions received prior to enrollment were not associated with Candida colonization. The odds of being colonized if breast milk had not been initiated was 2.15(95% CI, 0.525–7.866) although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.190). This finding could be attributed to the presence of lactobacillus in the breast milk that has been demonstrated to reduce gut Candida colonization in preterm neonates26,27.

Mucocutaneous Candidiasis occurred in 28% of colonized neonates between the 6th and 12th day of life. These findings were similar to those observed in other studies one describing mucocutaneous candidiasis in a third of colonized neonates20 and another describing the time of occurrence as 2nd to 3rd week of life28. Although other studies have reported candidemia in 7–20% of colonized preterm neonates, in our study, we did not find any. This may be due to the fact that our study did not have extremely premature neonates who are more susceptible and the unit does minimal invasive procedures hence minimizing risk for Candidemia. Although studies have shown that multiple body site colonization with Candida is associated with candidemia13,29, our study did not find this association. However, mortality was significantly associated with more than one site colonization. The main cause of mortality among our study neonates was bacterial sepsis; the factors predisposing these neonates to bacterial sepsis may be the same factors that predispose them to early Candida colonization30.

The study limitations included an underestimated prevalence since we did not screen for colonization within 24 hours of life. Our data was skewed with the majority of our study subjects being >30 weeks gestation, since most of the extremely preterm neonates in our unit do not survive beyond 72 hours of life. The study was not powered enough to study associations and our inability to do postmortem on study participants who died especially those with suspected NEC might have compromised identification of invasive candidiasis.

Conclusion: In view of the perceived threat of Candidemia among this population with the high colonization and low levels of candidemia observed in this study, the consequence of early colonization needs to be further elucidated in Uganda

What is already known on this subject

Candida colonization among preterm neonates is a predictor for invasive candidiasis. Antifungal prophylaxis among preterm neonates effectively reduces fungal colonization and invasive disease.

What this study adds

Early Candida colonization of preterm neonates in a low-resource setting is very prevalent. Candidemia is not common.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of the Special Care Unit, the departments of Paediatrics and Medical Microbiology of Makerere University College of Health Sciences for the assistance extended during the study.

Conflict of interest

The study funders did not actively participate in the study and none of the authors had any conflict of interest.

Contributorship statement

Abdallah Yaser was the principal investigator; he did the literature search, data collection, entry and the writing up of this work. Philippa Musoke and Jolly Nankunda were involved in study design and methodology; reviewed the write up, data analysis and interpretation of findings. Kaddu Mulindwa guided on laboratory techniques appropriate and reviewed results.

References

  • 1.WHO, author; WHO, editor. Handbook: IMCI integrated management of childhood illnesses. Geneva: WHO; 2005. The sick young infant ages 1 week to 2 months: Assess and classify; pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5–11;365(9462):891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO, author. Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality. Country, Regional and Global estimates. 2006 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jessica Jitta DK. Situation Analysis of Newborn Health in Uganda. 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UNICEF, author. UNICEF: Uganda Country profile: Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival. 112010. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaufman D, Kilpatrick L, Hudson RG, Campbell DE, Kaufman A, Douglas SD, et al. Decreased superoxide production, degranulation, tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion, and CD11b/CD18 receptor expression by adherent monocytes from preterm infants. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999 Jul;6(4):525–529. doi: 10.1128/cdli.6.4.525-529.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marodi L, Johnston R B Jr, editors; Polin RA, Fox W W, Abman S H, editors. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Philadelphia, Pa.: The W.B. Saunders Co.; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Makhoul IR, Sujov P, Smolkin T, Lusky A, Reichman B. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of late-onset sepsis among very low birth weight infants in Israel: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):34–39. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):285–291. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.2.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saiman L, Ludington E, Pfaller M, Rangel-Frausto S, Wiblin RT, Dawson J, et al. Risk factors for candidemia in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit patients. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey study group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Apr;19(4):319–324. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200004000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang YC, Lin TY, Leu HS, Peng HL, Wu JH, Chang HY. Outbreak of Candida parapsilosis fungemia in neonatal intensive care units: clinical implications and genotyping analysis. Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF02560505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang YC, Li CC, Lin TY, Lien RI, Chou YH, Wu JL, et al. Association of fungal colonization and invasive disease in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Sep;17(9):819–822. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199809000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manzoni P, Farina D, Leonessa M, d'Oulx EA, Galletto P, Mostert M, et al. Risk factors for progression to invasive fungal infection in preterm neonates with fungal colonization. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2359–2364. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Singh K, Chakrabarti A, Narag A, et al. Yeast colonization and fungemia in preterm neonates in tertiary care centre. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 1999;110:169–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mendiratta DK, Rawat V, Thamke D, et al. Candida colonization in preterm babies admitted to neonatal intensive care unit in the rural setting. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006 Oct;24(4):263–267. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.29384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benjamin DK, Jr, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, McDonald SA, Oh W, Higgins RD, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):84–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Austin N, Darlow BA, McGuire W. Prophylactic oral/topical non-absorbed antifungal agents to prevent invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct;7(4):CD003478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003478.pub3. doi(4):CD003478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clerihew L, Austin N, McGuire W. Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;4(4):CD003850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003850.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ali GY, Algohary EH, Rashed KA, Almoghanum M, Khalifa AA. Prevalence of Candida colonization in preterm newborns and VLBW in neonatal intensive care unit: role of maternal colonization as a risk factor in transmission of disease. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;25(6):789–795. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.622005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baley JE, Kliegman RM, Boxerbaum B, Fanaroff AA. Fungal colonization in the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics. 1986 Aug;78(2):225–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Farmaki E, Evdoridou J, Pouliou T, Bibashi E, Panagopoulou P, Filioti J, et al. Fungal colonization in the neonatal intensive care unit: risk factors, drug susceptibility, and association with invasive fungal infections. Am J Perinatol. 2007 Feb;24(2):127–135. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bliss JM, Basavegowda KP, Watson WJ, Sheikh AU, Ryan RM. Vertical and horizontal transmission of Candida albicans in very low birth weight infants using DNA fingerprinting techniques. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Mar;27(3):231–235. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815bb69d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saiman L, Ludington E, Dawson JD. National Epidemiology of Mycoses Study Group. Risk factors for Candida species colonization of neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Dec;20(12):1119–1124. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200112000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xanthou M. Immunologic deficiencies in small-for-dates neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1985;(319):143–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1985.tb10124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ohmit SE, Sobel JD, Schuman P, et al. HIV Epidemiology Research Study (HERS) Group. Longitudinal study of mucosal Candida species colonization and candidiasis among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and at-risk HIV-seronegative women. J Infect Dis. 2003 Jul 1;188(1):118–127. doi: 10.1086/375746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Manzoni P, Mostert M, Leonessa ML, et al. Oral supplementation with Lactobacillus casei subspecies rhamnosus prevents enteric colonization by Candida species in preterm neonates: a randomized study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 15;42(12):1735–1742. doi: 10.1086/504324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manzoni P. Use of Lactobacillus casei subspecies Rhamnosus GG and gastrointestinal colonization by Candida species in preterm neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Dec;45(Suppl 3):S190–S194. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000302971.06115.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Faix RG, Kovarik SM, Shaw TR, Johnson RV. Mucocutaneous and invasive candidiasis among very low birth weight (less than 1,500 grams) infants in intensive care nurseries: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 1989 Jan;83(1):101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Manzoni P, Farina D, Galletto P, Leonessa M, Priolo C, Arisio R, et al. Type and number of sites colonized by fungi and risk of progression to invasive fungal infection in preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(3):220–226. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manzoni P, Farina D, Monetti C, et al. Earlyonset neutropenia is a risk factor for Candida colonization in very low-birth-weight neonates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jan;57(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES