Abstract
Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) involving the coronary arteries is an uncommon but important condition that can present as acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, or potentially sudden cardiac death. Although the classic angiographic “string of beads” that may be observed in renal artery FMD does not occur in coronary arteries, potential manifestations include spontaneous coronary artery dissection, distal tapering or long, smooth narrowing that may represent dissection, intramural hematoma, spasm, or tortuosity. Importantly, FMD must be identified in at least one other noncoronary arterial territory to attribute any coronary findings to FMD. Although there is limited evidence to guide treatment, many lesions heal spontaneously; thus, a conservative approach is generally preferred. The etiology is poorly understood, but there are ongoing efforts to better characterize FMD and define its genetic and molecular basis. This report reviews the clinical course of FMD involving the coronary arteries and provides guidance for diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, coronary vessel anomalies, dysplasia, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction
Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is an arteriopathy distinct from atherosclerosis or vasculitis that may result in stenosis, aneurysm, dissection, or occlusion. It predominantly affects middle-aged women but may occur at any age in both sexes (1,2). The renal, carotid, and vertebral arteries are most frequently involved, but FMD has been reported in virtually every artery in the body (1,3,4). Although clinically manifest FMD with involvement of the coronary arteries arises less frequently, it is important to recognize and treat appropriately. Coronary involvement with FMD may result in significant morbidity and mortality from coronary artery dissection, leading to acute coronary syndrome with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction. There has been recent interest in spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and its frequent association with FMD (5–8), but there is no comprehensive published review of coronary artery manifestations of FMD to guide physicians in the diagnosis and management of this important and underrecognized condition.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DEMOGRAPHICS
In 1965, Hill and Antonius (9) first reported the pathology and clinical histories of 2 patients with FMD and coronary artery involvement. However, in the 5 decades since this initial report, many descriptions of FMD involving the coronary arteries have been small autopsy series or case reports (10). Clinically manifest FMD with coronary artery involvement is believed to be rare, but its true prevalence is unknown. This is partly due to a lack of specific coronary findings or symptoms before an acute event. Importantly, while a “string of beads” appearance can be diagnostic of FMD in the renal, carotid, and other arterial beds, this appearance rarely, if ever, occurs in the coronary arteries. Rather, as discussed later, most patients with coronary artery manifestations of FMD present with SCAD or smooth narrowing and are subsequently found to have typical FMD findings in the noncoronary arteries.
The demographics of patients with coronary artery manifestations of FMD are similar to those of patients with FMD in other locations. The mean age at diagnosis of the first 447 patients enrolled in the U.S. Registry for FMD was 51.9 ± 13.1 years (range of 5 to 86 years), and 91% were female (2). Hypertension was the most common cardiovascular risk factor (71%) due to renal artery FMD, but other cardiovascular risk factors were infrequent (37.2% were current or past smokers, and 42% were being treated with a statin). In comparison, in a series of 7 patients diagnosed antemortem with coronary artery manifestations of FMD, all were women between 42 and 56 years of age (11). Similarly, in a series of 50 patients with SCAD in which 86% had confirmed FMD, the mean age was 51 ± 9.6 years (range 31 to 84 years), and the cardiovascular risk profile was similar to that reported in the U.S. Registry for FMD (5).
ETIOLOGY
Although various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the etiology of FMD in general and its coronary artery manifestations, the cause remains unknown. Many of the reports speculating about the biological etiology were published decades ago, with few subsequently published reports. It is most likely that subjects with FMD carry a genetic predisposition, because 7% to 11% of first-degree relatives have FMD (2,12,13). Further evidence that this is a genetically mediated disease was derived from the U.S. Registry for FMD, in which 53.5% of first- or second-degree relatives had a stroke (many before 60 years of age), 23.5% had an aneurysm, and 19.8% died suddenly (2). On the basis of pedigree studies, some have suggested that FMD may be due to an autosomal dominant trait with variable penetrance (14,15). However, the genetics underlying FMD remain poorly understood. One group of investigators used scanning electron microscopy to perform ultrastructural analyses of surgical specimens from 20 renal arteries with FMD (16). They hypothesized that encasement of the vasa vasorum by connective tissue leads to worsening medial ischemia, subsequent transformation of smooth muscle cells to myofibroblasts, and progression of disease.
Finally, because more than 90% of patients with FMD are women, including those with SCAD (5,17), estrogen is an attractive culprit in the development of FMD. However, there is no concrete evidence that estrogen or other hormones play a role in the development of FMD or its coronary manifestations.
On the basis of the available evidence at present, the generally accepted consensus is that FMD is likely a multifactorial disease with varying contributions from genetic, gender/hormonal, and environmental influences (18).
PATHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
The histological appearance of renal artery FMD has been well characterized. In 1938, Leadbetter and Burkland (19) first described FMD in a 5½-year-old African-American boy with severe hypertension. The renal artery was occluded by an “intra-arterial mass of smooth muscle.” The patient subsequently underwent unilateral nephrectomy of an ectopic pelvic kidney, and his hypertension was cured. In an angiographic-pathological correlation study, Harrison and McCormack (20) separated renal artery FMD into 3 groups on the basis of whether the intima, media, or adventitia of the renal arterial wall was involved (Table 1). In this early report, the media was affected in 80% to 90% of cases, and medial fibroplasia was the most common medial subtype. Because of collagen deposition that is seen histologically in medial fibroplasia, areas of arterial stenosis and poststenotic dilation develop. This corresponds to the “string of beads” appearance on angiography that is classically associated with renal artery FMD (21). Unlike the situation for renal artery FMD, reliable reports of the histological characteristics of FMD affecting the coronary arteries are essentially nonexistent and no histological classification system has been proposed.
TABLE 1.
Classification of FMD
Classification of FMD | ||
---|---|---|
Histological: 1971 (20) | Angiographic: French/Belgian Consensus 2012 (22) |
Angiographic: American Heart Association 2014 |
Medial | Multifocal | Multifocal |
Medial fibroplasia | ||
Perimedial fibroplasia | ||
Medial hyperplasia | ||
Intimal fibroplasia | Unifocal (<1 cm) | Focal |
Adventitial fibroplasia | Tubular (≥1 cm) |
Modified from Olin et al. (18).
FMD = fibromuscular dysplasia.
Histopathologic classification played an early (and now somewhat historical) role in managing patients with FMD during the era pre-dating catheter-based endovascular interventions, when clinically significant lesions were managed surgically. In the contemporary era, most patients with FMD who undergo revascularization of the coronary artery (or any other affected arteries) do so via an endovascular approach. Therefore, pathological specimens of vessels from patients with FMD are now rarely available (18). This has led to the evolution of a newer FMD classification system on the basis of angiography (Table 1, Figure 1) (18,20,22). Prior angiographic-pathological correlative studies showed that multifocal FMD (“string of beads”) is associated with medial fibroplasia, whereas focal FMD is typically associated with intimal fibroplasia, medial hyperplasia, or adventitial fibroplasia (20,21,23–25). Thus, the new angiographic FMD classification is conveniently translatable back to the original histopathologic designations. Nevertheless, while this new classification on the basis of angiographic appearance of a peripheral artery is straightforward, it has limited utility for classifying coronary artery involvement associated with FMD due to the unique manifestations of this disease in the coronary arterial bed.
FIGURE 1. Angiographic Classification of Noncoronary FMD: Multifocal Versus Focal.
(A) Multifocal renal artery FMD with alternating stenosis and dilation, creating the classic “string of beads” appearance on angiography (arrows). (B) Angiography showing focal renal artery FMD (arrows). FMD = fibromuscular dysplasia.
PRESENTATION
The majority of patients with coronary artery manifestations of FMD present with dissection of an epicardial artery (left anterior descending [LAD], circumflex, or right coronary artery) or a major branch, which clinically leads to unstable angina, myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, or potentially sudden cardiac death (11,26–28). There are autopsy reports of sudden cardiac death purported to be secondary to FMD of “small coronary arteries,” with obliteration of the sinoatrial or atrioventricular nodal arteries, resulting in fatal arrhythmias (29–33). However, in these reports, FMD was not sought or confirmed in any other blood vessel; thus, “small coronary artery” FMD likely represents a separate disease process (18). Among 488 patients in the U.S. Registry for FMD who were enrolled for ≥ year and with ≥ follow-up visit, there were only 4 deaths (0.8%) during a median follow-up period of 23.9 months (34). Notably, none were due to coronary manifestations of FMD; 3 of these deaths were due to malignancy, and 1 patient who died was lost to follow-up (34).
In patients presenting acutely due to coronary artery manifestations of FMD, electrocardiographic findings may be suggestive of acute ischemia with or without ST-segment elevation, and there are often elevated cardiac biomarkers (creatine kinase-myocardial band or troponin) (11). According to the 2012 3rd Universal Definition (35), SCAD presenting as myocardial infarction is classified as a type 2 infarction, which is considered to be primarily due to a condition other than atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and includes other disorders (e.g., coronary endothelial dysfunction, coronary artery spasm, coronary embolism, tachyarrhythmias/ bradyarrhythmias, anemia, respiratory failure, and hypotension). Recent data indicate that in the mostly female population presenting with SCAD and type 2 myocardial infarction, FMD may be identified in other vascular territories in the majority of cases (5–7).
DIAGNOSIS
FMD with coronary artery involvement should be considered in any patient without cardiac risk factors presenting with acute coronary syndrome or new left ventricular dysfunction, and especially in middle-aged women who are found to have isolated involvement of a mid-distal coronary artery with normal coronary arteries elsewhere.
When considering FMD, numerous features in the patient’s history and physical examination may suggest this diagnosis (Table 2). The manifestations of noncoronary FMD depend on the arterial bed affected, most often hypertension with renal artery FMD and headache or pulsatile tinnitus with cervical vessel involvement.
TABLE 2.
Common Presenting Clinical Features of FMD
History (listed in order of decreasing frequency): |
Hypertension |
Headache |
Pulsatile tinnitus |
Dizziness |
Neck pain |
Nonpulsatile tinnitus |
Physical examination |
Bruit: cervical, epigastric, or flank |
Cranial nerve abnormalities |
Other focal neurological deficits |
Horner syndrome |
Other |
Aneurysm |
Dissection (renal, carotid, vertebral, coronary) |
At the present time, catheter-based angiography is the only validated and accurate method of diagnosing coronary artery involvement and there are no studies documenting the utility of other noninvasive imaging modalities for diagnosing coronary artery manifestations of FMD. A number of distinct angiographic findings are supportive of this diagnosis (Table 3, Central Illustration) and include angiographically obvious SCAD (Figures 2 to 4), smooth narrowing or distal tapering typically with intramural hematoma (Figure 5), spasm, and tortuosity. These features often overlap, and more than one may be appreciated in the same patient or even in the same coronary artery. SCAD is the most common presentation of FMD involving the coronary arteries (Figures 2 to 4). There are isolated case reports of FMD manifesting with a “string of beads” appearance of the coronary arteries; however, in the few articles describing this, the “beading” does not have the characteristic appearance of that seen in noncoronary FMD and probably represents another angiographic appearance of dissection (27,28). The appearance of distal tapering or long, smooth narrowing in the middle of the artery may also represent dissection or intramural hematoma (Figure 5) (11,26,36). Lesions are usually well demarcated on angiography, with a discrete transition from normal to diseased coronary artery (Figure 5) (3,11). Often, there is involvement of a single epicardial vessel with otherwise normal appearing coronary arteries (11). It is important to administer intra-arterial vasodilators to be certain that spasm is not accounting for these angiographic findings. Arterial tortuosity is an additional aspect of FMD involving the coronary arteries (and other vascular territories) (37), although this alone would seem unlikely to cause symptoms and is not specific for FMD.
TABLE 3.
Angiographic Features of FMD Involving the Coronary Arteries
Feature | Comments |
---|---|
SCAD | Dissection with obvious radiolucent area, flap, extraluminal cap, or contrast staining |
Smooth narrowing or distal tapering | Increasingly recognized as coronary dissection with intramural hematoma visualized by IVUS or OCT |
Intramural hematoma | May arise de novo and be appreciated by IVUS or OCT or after stent implantation with a new stenotic Lesion appearing a few millimeters from the proximal or distal stent edge (Figure 4) |
Spasm | A component of coronary spasm may occur; intra-arterial nitroglycerin usually relieves |
Tortuosity | Coronary artery tortuosity may be present. Tortuosity is a frequent finding in other vascular beds (carotid, vertebral, renal) in patients with FMD |
IVUS = intravascular ultrasound; OCT = optical coherence tomography; SCAD = spontaneous coronary artery dissection; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION. Angiographic Features of Fibromuscular Dysplasia Involving the Coronary Arteries.
(A) Dissection, (B) smooth narrowing, (C) intramural hematoma, and (D) tortuosity. Spasm may also occur but is angiographically similar in appearance to smooth narrowing and is differentiated by intracoronary vasodilator administration.
FIGURE 2. SCAD of the LAD Artery.
A 34-year-old female patient presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 7 days after cesarean delivery of a healthy newborn. The pregnancy was complicated by hypertension. (A) Coronary angiography showing the left coronary system in a cranial projection, revealing extensive dissection of the mid-LAD coronary artery (arrows). (B) Optical coherence tomography of the dissected LAD artery, showing the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL). (C) Angiographically normal right coronary artery of the same patient. Original images are presented here, but this case was previously reported (124). LAD = left anterior descending; SCAD = spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
FIGURE 4. SCAD of the LAD Artery With Intramural Hematoma.
A 40-year-old woman presented 10 days after a third-trimester miscarriage with troponin-positive non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (A) Coronary angiography revealed SCAD of the mid-LAD artery (white arrows). No stent was placed, and she was managed medically with a heparin drip and tight blood pressure control for 48 h. She was then discharged from the hospital on aspirin, clopidogrel, a beta-blocker, and a statin. She returned 5 days post-discharge with recurrent non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent (B) repeat coronary angiography that showed worsening dissection of the LAD artery (white arrows). Due to ongoing cardiac ischemia and worsening dissection, the proximal and mid-LAD arteries were then stented (white arrows) (C). (D) Caudal coronary angiographic view after stenting, with re-expansion of the LAD artery but smooth narrowing of the mid-distal left main artery (red arrow), ostial LAD (yellow arrow), and ramus intermedius (white arrow). (E and F) Intravascular ultrasound performed immediately after percutaneous intervention revealed a large intramural hematoma (asterisks) in the mid-distal left main artery (red arrow), which extended into the LAD artery (yellow arrow). Over the next 2 days, she continued to have intermittent chest pain and rising troponin levels; she therefore underwent a third cardiac catheterization and was found to have (G) new severe proximal narrowing of the left circumflex artery (white arrows) and an occluded first obtuse marginal artery (black arrow), with patent intervention sites. No further intervention was performed, and the patient improved with medical therapy over the following days. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a mild-moderately decreased ejection fraction (46%), and she was ultimately discharged home on aspirin, clopidogrel, a beta-blocker, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. She has remained well for 1 month post-discharge and awaits formal evaluation for FMD. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.
FIGURE 5. Smooth Coronary Artery Narrowing in a Patient With FMD.
A 52-year-old woman with a history of migraine presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and was found to have smooth narrowing and distal tapering involving the LAD and left circumflex arteries. (A) Coronary angiography with caudal view showing distal smooth tapering of the LAD and left circumflex arteries (arrows). (B) Cranial view showing distal smooth tapering of the LAD artery (arrows). Several aliquots of both intracoronary nitroglycerin and intracoronary verapamil were administered over a 15-min period without any effect. (C) In the same patient, computed tomographic angiography of the carotid arteries is notable for a beaded appearance of the mid and distal portions of the cervical left internal carotid artery (arrows), consistent with FMD. The patient was managed conservatively with aspirin and clopidogrel. (D) Repeat coronary angiography 1 month after initial cardiac catheterization was angiographically normal, likely representing healed dissection of the LAD and left circumflex arteries (arrows). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an excellent adjunctive imaging modality for use in the coronary or other vascular beds. In combination with angiography, IVUS provides enhanced information about all layers of the arterial wall to help distinguish coronary artery manifestations of FMD from other forms of coronary disease (Figure 4) (38). Generally, fibrous tissue and collagen correlate with echogenic signals on IVUS, whereas smooth muscle hyperplasia corresponds to echolucency.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is yet another intracoronary imaging modality that may be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of coronary artery involvement with FMD (Figure 2) (39). OCT generates 3-dimensional images from optical scattering within tissue. With OCT, the fibrous and collagen deposition in coronary arteries with FMD involvement appears bright (high reflectivity) and smooth muscle hyperplasia looks dark (low reflectivity) (39). A potential concern when performing OCT with current systems is the need to evacuate blood from the vessel lumen by high-flow intracoronary contrast injection. Overly aggressive contrast injection may theoretically be associated with propagation of a coronary dissection.
There are several potential pitfalls in diagnosing coronary artery manifestations of FMD. For example, changes secondary to FMD may be confused for atherosclerosis. When doubt arises, IVUS or OCT may be particularly helpful for further lesion evaluation, with attention paid to differentiating the typical appearance of coronary artery manifestations of FMD from that of atherosclerotic disease (presence of lipid, plaque, and calcification) (40). An additional discriminatory factor is the location of the disease, because FMD tends to affect the mid or distal segments of the artery whereas atherosclerosis often involves the proximal portion of an artery (Figures 2 to 5) (11,26). In 2 case series with a total of 10 patients with FMD and involvement of the LAD artery, 90% had involvement of the mid and/or distal segment (11,26).
Although difficult to quantify, these angiographic features also have clinical prognostic significance. The clinical course of smooth narrowing or distal tapering is usually favorable, with healing typically noted on repeat angiography at 4 to 6 weeks (Figure 5) (40). However, angiographically visible SCAD is likely to be associated with acute coronary syndrome and may even be fatal in rare cases (5,8).
To classify a patient as having FMD affecting the coronary arteries, visualization of FMD in other vascular territories is mandatory. There are 2 good reasons to perform cross-sectional imaging from the head to the pelvis in every patient who presents with SCAD or the other coronary artery findings discussed in the preceding text: to determine if FMD is present in any other vascular bed and to determine if there is evidence of aneurysm(s) or dissection(s) in any other blood vessel. Although magnetic resonance angiography can accurately identify aneurysms and dissections, the resolution is often not sufficient to identify FMD in the distal renal or carotid arteries (18). The resolution of computed tomographic angiography is superior to that of magnetic resonance angiography and is the recommended cross-sectional imaging modality in these circumstances (18). If catheter-based angiography is required to confirm the diagnosis of FMD or evaluate lesion severity, a potential pitfall to avoid is classifying the patient as having FMD when in fact stationary or standing waves are present (Figure 6) (41,42). There are 2 distinguishing features: in multifocal FMD, the beading is larger than the normal caliber of the artery and occurs in an irregular pattern, whereas standing waves are regular oscillations of the artery and administration of nitroglycerin abolishes the spasm and returns the artery to normal.
FIGURE 6. Standing Waves.
Arteriography of the axillary artery showing standing waves (arrows). Standing waves are due to catheter-induced spasm, and typically the administration of nitroglycerin will result in a normal-appearing artery. Note the regular oscillations that occur with standing waves, in contrast to the appearance of the “string of beads” (Figure 1), where the “beads” are larger than the normal caliber of the artery.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis of coronary artery manifestations of FMD is challenging, and several conditions need to be carefully considered in the differential diagnosis (Table 4). Obtaining a detailed history is a fundamental part of the evaluation. For most patients, catheter-based angiography will be necessary to evaluate and treat cardiac ischemia; treatment and prognosis may vary on the basis of the predominant coronary manifestation (e.g., SCAD vs. smooth narrowing).
TABLE 4.
Differential Diagnosis of FMD Involving the Coronary Arteries
Patient Demographics and Any Pertinent Examination Findings |
Risk Factors | Appearance on Angiography | Arterial Region Affected | Adjunctive Testing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMD | Female, mean age at diagnosis of 52 yrs, hypertension, cervical or abdominal bruit | Hypertension, strenuous activity, absence of typical risk factors of atherosclerosis | One or more features: SCAD, smooth narrowing or distal tapering, intramural hematoma, spasm, tortuosity | Mid-distal epicardial coronary arteries (most commonly LAD) but any coronary artery can be involved | OCT and IVUS; acute phase reactants, autoimmune markers, and complete blood cell count should be normal |
EhLers-DanLos syndrome type IV | Younger than 40 yrs of age, small body habitus, characteristic facial appearance, translucent skin, easy bruising, hypermobile joints | Family history | Dissection and/or aneurysm of any artery | Epicardial coronary arteries and any other artery in the body | Mutation in the COL3A1 gene |
Takayasu arteritis | Female, younger than 40 yrs of age, hypertension, absent or decreased pulses, bruits, murmur of aortic regurgitation | None known | Focal stenosis in the left main trunk, focal stenosis in proximal or mid-coronary artery (usually LAD), aneurysm of ascending aorta, aortic regurgitation, thickening of the aortic wall and aortic valve; also affects other major branches of the aorta such as subclavian, axillary, and renal arteries; although less common, may affect the lower extremity arteries | Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein Level; exclude infection such as tuberculosis | |
Cocaine vasculitis | Men with fewer cardiovascular risk factors, ECG may show ST-segment elevations, hole in nasal septum | Smoking; acute hypertension may be associated with cocaine ingestion | Stenosis, spasm, aneurysm | Epicardial coronary arteries | Urine toxicology |
Coronary vasospasm | Middle-aged men and women, ST-segment elevations on ECG that correlate with anginal symptoms | Smoking | Localized occlusion at one or more segments or diffuse occlusion | Epicardial coronary arteries | Provocative testing with ergonovine or acetylcholine |
Myocardial bridging | Older than 30 yrs of age | Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | Narrowing during systole that disappears during diastole (“milking effect”) | Middle segment of the LAD artery; also rarely arises in other coronary vessels/segments | Intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin |
Atherosclerotic plaque | Generally older than 60 yrs of age | Diabetes, hypertension, smoking, hyperlipidemia, family history of coronary artery disease | Stenosis | Epicardial coronary arteries | OCT and IVUS |
Excluding Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular subtype, is important because this may also manifest as coronary artery dissection (43,44). Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV often have a small body habitus with characteristic facial appearance (large eyes, small chin, thin nose and lips, lobeless ears), pale translucent skin, easy bruising, and hypermobile joints (45). This disease often has a more fulminant course than FMD involving the coronary arteries, with 25% of patients presenting by 20 years of age and more than 80% experiencing life-threatening complications by 40 years of age (46). Identifying a mutation in the gene for type III procollagen (COL3A1) confirms the diagnosis (46).
Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis are large vessel vasculitides that predominantly affect the aorta and its branches but can involve the coronary arteries in up to 30% of cases (47,48). Like those with FMD, patients with Takayasu arteritis affecting the coronary arteries are typically young women presenting with angina and, less commonly, myocardial infarction (49). On physical examination, they may have a discrepancy in arm blood pressures; absent or decreased radial, brachial, and/or carotid pulses; supraclavicular and cervical bruits; or the murmur of aortic regurgitation (50,51). Laboratory testing is notable for elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level (49,52). Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiographic is useful in evaluating the aortic wall thickness, the size of the ascending aorta, and the presence of aortic valve thickening (51). Catheter-based angiography is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronary artery involvement. Severe, focal stenosis of the left main trunk is common (51). There may also be focal or tubular stenosis of the proximal or mid coronary artery (usually the LAD) (49,50).
Cocaine use should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. In contrast to the typical patient with FMD, patients who use cocaine and have cardiac symptoms are most frequently male and smoke cigarettes (53–55). Urine toxicology screening may be diagnostic for cocaine ingestion (56). If symptoms are suggestive of ischemia and warrant angiography, stenotic lesions in one or more coronary arteries are most commonly seen (57,58). This reflects that vasoconstriction from cocaine use increases narrowing at regions of underlying atherosclerotic coronary disease and that cocaine use accelerates atherosclerotic plaque formation (59,60). Patients who use cocaine may also develop cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, obstructive small vessel disease, and myocarditis (61,62).
Coronary artery spasm or Prinzmetal angina (63), which causes angina at rest, may present in a similar fashion to FMD with coronary artery involvement. Smoking is a major risk factor for coronary artery spasm (64). On angiography, coronary artery spasm typically occurs at a localized segment of an epicardial coronary artery but can affect multiple segments of the same or different arteries (65). Diffuse coronary spasm has also been described (66). ST-segment elevation on an electrocardiogram that coincides with rest angina supports the diagnosis (66). If necessary, coronary spasm can be induced by provocative testing using intravenous or intracoronary ergonovine or acetylcholine (65). Resolution of the stenosis with intravenous vasodilator administration can distinguish this entity from FMD (66).
Myocardial bridging, which occurs when part of an epicardial coronary artery is embedded in the myocardium, can present like FMD involving the coronary arteries with angina, myocardial infarction, or, rarely, sudden cardiac death due to arterial compression during systole (67–73). This phenomenon mostly affects the mid-LAD artery and creates what is known as a tunneled artery (Figure 7) (74,75). Although this is a congenital abnormality, most patients present after 30 years of age (74). Angiography is the gold standard for diagnosis and shows systolic narrowing of the affected coronary artery that disappears during diastole (“the milking effect”) (76). Intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin may cause the relative degree of stenosis to increase because the intramyocardial segment of the vessel is constrained and unable to respond, while the other coronary segments dilate in response to nitroglycerin (77,78).
FIGURE 7. Myocardial Bridging.
Coronary angiography showing cranial and caudal views, highlighting the “milking effect” that occurs with an LAD artery myocardial bridge, arising when the LAD artery takes an intramyocardial course. During systole, myocardial tissue surrounding the mid-LAD artery contracts, producing a narrowed segment of tunneled artery (arrows, lower panels). This narrowing is released during diastole (arrows, upper panels), when there is ventricular relaxation. Abbreviation as in Figure 2.
Finally, acute coronary syndrome secondary to atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion must always be included in the differential diagnosis. Like FMD, atherosclerosis can manifest as stenotic lesions in one or more epicardial coronary arteries. In uncertain cases, either IVUS and/or OCT can be used to visualize plaque morphology (79–81). Additionally, atherosclerotic plaque is most common in older patients with risk factors including diabetes, hypertension, cigarette smoking, and hyperlipidemia (82–93).
SCAD
SCAD occurs when an expanding hematoma leads to separation of the layers of the coronary arterial wall (Figures 2 to 4) (5,94). Of importance, recent studies have suggested that FMD may be present in a majority of patients with SCAD (5,95), but SCAD may also arise in the absence of FMD. In a study of 50 patients with nonatherosclerotic SCAD, 86% of all patients had imaging consistent with FMD of at least one noncoronary artery (5). Importantly, 6% of patients were not screened for FMD, indicating that the total proportion may be higher. Other studies have corroborated these findings (95). It should be noted that the high prevalence of FMD in patients with SCAD is on the basis of very few studies and this association has only recently been recognized. In studies published before 2005, imaging of peripheral vessels (renal, carotid, vertebral, mesenteric arteries) was not performed; therefore, the association of SCAD and FMD was not recognized (96,97). Additionally, in a recent analysis of 738 patients enrolled in the U.S. Registry for FMD, 165 (22.4%) had a dissection of an artery other than the aorta (98). Of those 165 patients, the carotid arteries were involved in 73%, vertebral arteries in 19%, renal arteries in 16%, and coronary arteries in 4.8%. Again, this probably represents an underestimation because FMD was not often considered or looked for as the underlying disorder in patients presenting with SCAD before the publication of recent studies (5,7,8,99).
Published accounts of SCAD mirror those of FMD involving the coronary arteries, confirming that these are likely a similar disease in many patients. Patients with SCAD are predominantly female, with a mean age of approximately 50 years at diagnosis, and often have no cardiovascular risk factors other than hypertension (5,100–102). Estrogen may be implicated in SCAD, because a significant number of cases of SCAD occur in the post-partum period (8). According to an analysis of more than 50 cases of post-partum SCAD, the majority of dissections occurred within 2 weeks of delivery (103). The hormonal and hemodynamic changes in the peripartum, delivery, and post-partum period may account for the association between SCAD and post-partum status. Hormonal changes during pregnancy have been shown to have effects on the arterial wall, possibly predisposing to dissection in the coronary vasculature, in conjunction with the increased cardiac output that occurs throughout pregnancy and especially during delivery (104–106).
Angiography in a patient with SCAD may reveal multiple lumens, luminal narrowing, intimal flap, slow clearing of contrast, contrast staining, intraarterial thrombus (arising due to the exposure of subintimal tissues to blood), and sparing of the proximal region of the coronary artery (Figures 2 to 4) (5). IVUS and OCT are useful adjuncts in visualizing the dissection and extent of intramural hematoma (Figures 2 and Figure 4) (94,100,107–109). A classification system for SCAD was recently proposed: type 1, angiographically evident arterial wall contrast agent staining; type 2, diffuse stenosis of varying severity; and type 3, SCAD with appearance similar to an atherosclerotic lesion (40).
On the basis of retrospective studies, the estimated incidence of SCAD detected on all coronary angiograms ranges from 0.07% to 1.1% (102,110–112). Tweet et al. (8) retrospectively reviewed data on 87 patients with angiographically proven SCAD and found multivessel SCAD in 23% of patients. Conservative management in 31 patients and coronary artery bypass in 7 patients resulted in an uncomplicated hospital course. However, percutaneous intervention resulted in technical failure in 15 patients (35%) and 1 death. During a median follow-up of 47 months, 15 patients (17%) had recurrent SCAD, often in a previously unaffected coronary artery. Mortality was 1.1% at 1 year and 7.7% at 10 years. FMD was present in 8 of 16 (50%) femoral angiograms taken from the femoral artery access sheath before closure device placement. However, FMD was not routinely considered in these patients. In other series, the prognosis of patients who presented with SCAD was good, especially if they survived their initial event, with up to 95% 2-year survival (113,114). Importantly, the dissection tends to heal spontaneously and uncomplicated cases have good outcomes without intervention (5,99,115).
THERAPY
Caring for a patient with FMD and coronary artery involvement can be challenging, because there is limited objective evidence to guide therapy and no scientifically based recommendations due to the absence of prospective trials or even large observational case series. Therefore, therapy is on the basis of case reports and limited case series with extrapolation of therapies from nonrandomized publications.
In stable patients without active myocardial ischemia, a conservative approach avoiding percutaneous or surgical intervention is generally preferred for managing coronary artery manifestations of FMD. This is because SCAD (whether there is obvious dissection or long smooth narrowing) will typically heal spontaneously (Figure 5) (5,8,99,113). If stenting is performed, the dissection flap has a propensity to propagate proximally or distally beyond the stented segment, or intramural hematoma may arise (Figure 4). Therefore, avoidance of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery is recommended unless the patient has refractory ischemia despite an optimal medical regimen.
A reasonable approach to the medical management of a patient with FMD and clinically manifest coronary artery involvement is dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel 75 mg daily and aspirin 75 to 81 mg daily for up to 1 year if tolerated and without bleeding complications (99,116). Thereafter, aspirin alone should be continued indefinitely. The role of antithrombotic therapy in coronary dissection is not known. A beta-blocker may also be considered, with the rationale being that by reducing blood pressure and heart rate, beta-blocker therapy reduces coronary shear forces that may help to reduce the risk of further coronary dissection (99). Concomitant hypertension, whether or not attributed to renal artery FMD, should be treated to goal (18).
In unstable patients or those with active myocardial ischemia, an interventional approach may be required. Although angioplasty alone is preferred for renal artery FMD, intracoronary stent implantation is usually required in patients with SCAD. Care must be taken to avoid stent or vessel overdilation, because this may lead to propagation of coronary dissection at the stent edges. Therefore, avoiding high balloon inflation pressures and using smaller-sized stents may be advisable (38). The use of adjunctive intracoronary imaging with IVUS or OCT during percutaneous coronary intervention can help to avoid balloon or stent oversizing, optimize stent placement, and minimize complications (38). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery should be reserved for patients with multivessel involvement who have good distal target vessels. Although not commonly performed for this indication, coronary bypass surgery can be life-saving when used in the appropriate setting (8).
There is no evidence that statin therapy is beneficial in patients with FMD and/or dissection, and published guidelines do not address this question (117). Therefore, statin therapy should be initiated with the objective of correcting dyslipidemia, as per guideline criteria (18). Due to their pleiotropic effects, some physicians recommend statins for patients with acute coronary syndrome, regardless of its etiology (atherosclerotic or otherwise) or the patients’ lipid status. It should be noted that there is no clinical evidence for this approach in patients with type 2 (nonatherosclerotic) myocardial infarction.
There are no data to support or refute the use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal replacement therapy in FMD with coronary artery involvement. The available data regarding hormonal therapy are specific for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (117,118). We allow use of oral contraceptives for prevention of pregnancy or other hormonal therapy for debilitating post-menopausal symptoms. However, in the absence of a compelling reason to use hormonal therapy, we advise against their use until more data become available.
Cardiac rehabilitation is advisable for all patients with coronary artery manifestations of FMD. This may be especially helpful in overcoming a young patient’s anxiety related to experiencing an unprovoked and unanticipated coronary event. However, due to the rare association of SCAD with extreme physical activity (116,119,120), we advise against strenuous sports or lifting of heavy weights.
ONGOING RESEARCH
Without question, further research into coronary artery manifestations of FMD is required. Indeed, more must be learned about all aspects of this disease, including its epidemiology, etiology, pathology, diagnosis, and optimal treatment. Efforts to screen and identify more patients with coronary artery involvement are already under way at several institutions as part of the U.S. Registry for FMD, the Canadian Registry, and the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry (2,6–8,99). The U.S. Registry for FMD currently has more than 1,000 participants, and as it continues to grow, more precise information will be learned about the prevalence of coronary artery involvement and the subsequent outcomes of these patients. Detailed study of the cellular, molecular, and genetic etiology of FMD involving the coronary arteries and other vascular territories will potentially open the door for targeted therapies in the future. Our own laboratory is presently engaged in research to better understand these aspects of FMD (121,122).
CONCLUSIONS
Since its relatively recent initial description, a great deal has been learned about coronary artery involvement with FMD. However, it is important to recognize that the association of SCAD and FMD is on the basis of very few studies with small numbers of patients. To determine the true prevalence of FMD in patients with SCAD, cross-sectional imaging (computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography) from the head to the pelvis should be obtained in all patients with SCAD. Coordinated, large-scale projects such as the U.S. Registry for FMD and the French Registry for FMD have provided much needed clinical information (2,22,123). Nevertheless, FMD remains a medical enigma at the genetic and molecular levels. It is hoped that the intense research efforts currently under way will eliminate much of the mystery surrounding FMD and its coronary manifestations, enabling clinicians to provide patients with a clear diagnosis and, in the future, effective and evidence-based treatment.
FIGURE 3. SCAD of the Left Circumflex Artery.
A 37-year-old female patient presented with a troponin-positive non-ST-segment myocardial infarction. The patient had a pre-existing diagnosis of FMD with renal and carotid artery involvement. (A) Coronary angiography showing the left coronary system in a right anterior oblique-caudal projection. Arrows indicate dissection involving the obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex with mottled appearance, narrowing, and filling defect. Note the normal, smooth appearance of the other vessels and segments. (B) Angiographically normal right coronary artery of the same patient. (C) Computed tomographic angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. Note the tortuosity and beading in the mid and distal portion of the right internal carotid artery (arrows), typical of multifocal FMD. The carotid bifurcation (the site where atherosclerosis occurs) is normal. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.
Acknowledgments
Drs. Michelis and d’Escamard are supported by National Institutes of Health grant T32HL007824. Dr. Kovacic is supported by the National Institutes of Health (K08HL111330), the Leducq Foundation (Transatlantic Network of Excellence Award), and AstraZeneca. The authors’ research on fibromuscular dysplasia is supported by an anonymous philanthropic donation to the Mount Sinai Heart Center for Fibromuscular Dysplasia Care and Research. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Renu Virmani, MD, served as Guest Editor for this paper.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
- FMD
fibromuscular dysplasia
- IVUS
intravascular ultrasound
- LAD
left anterior descending
- OCT
optical coherence tomography
- SCAD
spontaneous coronary artery dissection
REFERENCES
- 1.Slovut D, Olin J. Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1862–1871. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra032393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Olin JW, Froehlich J, Gu X, et al. The United States Registry for Fibromuscular Dysplasia: results in the first 447 patients. Circulation. 2012;125:3182–3190. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.091223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Olin JW, Sealove BA. Diagnosis, management, and future developments of fibromuscular dysplasia. J Vase Surg. 2011;53:826–836. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Touze E, Oppenheim C, Trystram D, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of cervical and intracranial arteries. Int J Stroke. 2010;5:296–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saw J, Ricci D, Starovoytov A, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: prevalence of predisposing conditions including fibromuscular dysplasia in a tertiary center cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saw J, Aymong E, Mancini GB, et al. Nonatherosclerotic coronary artery disease in young women. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:814–819. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saw J, Poulter R, Fung A, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia: a case series. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:134–137. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation. 2012;126:579–588. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hill LD, Antonius JI. Arterial dysplasia: an important surgical lesion. Arch Surg. 1965;90:585–595. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320100129020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lie JT, Berg KK. Isolated fibromuscular dysplasia of the coronary arteries with spontaneous dissection and myocardial infarction. Hum Pathol. 1987;18:654–656. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pate G, Lowe R, Buller CE. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the coronary and renal arteries? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64:138–145. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pannier-Moreau I, Grimbert P, Fiquet-Kempf B, et al. Possible familial origin of multifocal renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1797–1801. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Suzuki H, Daida H, Sakurai H, et al. Familial fibromuscular dysplasia of bilateral brachial arteries. Heart. 1999;82:251–252. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mettinger KL, Ericson K. Fibromuscular dysplasia the brain. I. Observations on angiographic, clinical, and genetic characteristics. Stroke. 1982;13:46–52. doi: 10.1161/01.str.13.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rushton AR. The genetics of fibromuscular dysplasia. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:233–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sottiurai VS, Fry WJ, Stanley J. Ultrastructure of medial smooth muscle and myofibroblasts in human arterial dysplasia. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1280–1288. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370230070008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Luscher TF, Lie JT, Stanson AW, et al. Arterial fibromuscular dysplasia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987;62:931–952. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Olin JW, Gornick HL, Bacharach JM, et al. for the American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; American Heart Association Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research; American Heart Association Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; American Heart Association Stroke Council. Fibromuscular dysplasia: state of the science and critical unanswered questions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:1048–1078. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000442577.96802.8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leadbetter WF, Burkland CR. Hypertension in unilateral renal disease. J Urol. 1938;39:611–626. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harrison EG, Jr, McCormack LJ. Pathologic classification of renal arterial disease in renovascular hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc. 1971;46:161–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCormack LJ, Poutasse EF, Meaney TF, et al. A pathologic-arteriographic correlation of renal arterial disease. Am Heart J. 1966;72:188–198. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90442-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Persu A, Touze E, Mousseaux E, et al. Diagnosis and management of fibromuscular dysplasia: an expert consensus. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:338–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stanley JC, Gewertz BL, Bove EL, et al. Arterial fibrodysplasia: histopathologic character and current etiologic concepts. Arch Surg. 1975:561–566. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110107018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Harrison EG, Jr, Hunt JC, Bernatz PE. Morphology of fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal artery in renovascular hypertension. Am J Med. 1967;43:97–112. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(67)90151-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kincaid OW, Davis GD, Hallermann FJ, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries Arteriographic features, classification, and observations on natural history of the disease. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1968;104:271–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huizar JF, Awasthi A, Kozman H. Fibromuscular dysplasia and acute myocardial infarction: evidence for a unique clinical and angiographic pattern. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18:E99–E101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Camuglia A, Manins V, Taylor A, et al. Case report and review: epicardial coronary artery fibromuscular dysplasia. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18:151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2007.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ogawa T, Nomura A, Komatsu H, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia involving coronary arteries: a case report. Angiology. 1999;50:153–156. doi: 10.1177/000331979905000210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.James TN. Morphologic characteristics and functional significance of focal fibromuscular dysplasia of small coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:12G–22G. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90954-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee AH, Gray PB, Gallagher PJ. Sudden death and regional left ventricular fibrosis with fibromuscular dysplasia of small intramyocardial coronary arteries. Heart. 2000;83:101–102. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.1.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Michaud K, Romain N, Brandt-Casadevall C, et al. Sudden death related to small coronary artery disease. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2001;22:225–227. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200109000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Veinot JP, Johnston B, Acharya V, et al. The spectrum of intramyocardial small vessel disease associated with sudden death. J Forens Sci. 2002;47:384–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jing HL, Hu BJ. Sudden death caused by stricture of the sinus node artery. Am J Forens Med Pathol. 1997;18:360–362. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199712000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.O’Connor S, Olin JW, Gu X, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia is a morbid disease with low associated morbidity: a report of the United States Registry for Fibromuscular Dysplasia (abstr) Vasc Med. 2014;19:223–224. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1581–1598. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nerantzis CE, Kalogrias NF, Letsas KP, et al. Post-mortem angiographic and histologic findings of coronary artery fibromuscular dysplasia. Int J Cardiol. 2007;122:e32–e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.06.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sethi SS, Lau JF, Godbold J, Gustavson S, Olin W. The S curve: a novel morphological finding in the internal carotid artery in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia. Vasc Med. 2014 Aug 18; doi: 10.1177/1358863X14547122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X14547122 [E-pub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Poulter R, Ricci D, Saw J. Perforation during stenting of a coronary artery with morphologic changes of fibromuscular dysplasia: an unrecognized risk with percutaneous intervention. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:519.e1–519.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saw J, Poulter R, Fung A. Intracoronary imaging of coronary fibromuscular dysplasia with OCT and IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:E879–E883. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saw J. Coronary angiogram classification of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013 Nov 13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25293. [E-pub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Olin J, Gornick H. Standing waves are not fibromuscular dysplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sharma AM, Gornik HL. Standing arterial waves is NOT fibromuscular dysplasia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:e9–e11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hampole CV, Philip F, Shafii A, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1883–1884. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nakamura M, Yajima J, Oikawa Y, et al. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-all three coronary artery spontaneous dissections. J Cardiol. 2009;53:458–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, et al. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos Support Group (UK) Am J Med Genet. 1997;77:31–37. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980428)77:1<31::aid-ajmg8>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A, et al. Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:673–680. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Subramanyan R, Joy J, Balakrishnan KG. Natural history of aortoarteritis (Takayasu’s disease) Circulation. 1989;80:429–437. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.3.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rav-Acha M, Plot L, Peled N, et al. Coronary involvement in Takayasu’s arteritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2007;6:566–571. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sun T, Zhang H, Ma W, et al. Coronary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis in 45 Chinese patients. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:493–497. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jang JJ, Gorevic PD, Olin JW. Imaging in vascular medicine. Giant cell arteritis presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Vasc Med. 2007;12:379. doi: 10.1177/1358863X07083176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jolly M, Bartholomew JR, Flamm SD, et al. Angina and coronary ostial lesions in a young woman as a presentation of Takayasu’s arteritis. Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;7:443–446. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(99)00010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Soeiro Ade M, Almeida MC, Torres TA, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and Takayasu arteritis. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32:297–302. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mittleman MA, Mintzer D, Maclure M, et al. Triggering of myocardial infarction by cocaine. Circulation. 1999;99:2737–2741. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.21.2737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hollander JE, Hoffman RS, Gennis P, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of cocaine-associated chest pain. Cocaine Associated Chest Pain (COCHPA) Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1:330–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Satran A, Bart BA, Henry CR, et al. Increased prevalence of coronary artery aneurysms among cocaine users. Circulation. 2005;111:2424–2429. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000165121.50527.DE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Preston KL, Silverman K, Schuster CR, et al. Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses. Addiction. 1997;92:717–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kontos MC, Jesse RL, Tatum JL, et al. Coronary angiographic findings in patients with cocaine-associated chest pain. J Emerg Med. 2003;24:9–13. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00660-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hollander JE, Hoffman RS. Cocaine-induced myocardial infarction: an analysis and review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 1992;10:169–177. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(92)90212-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Flores ED, Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, et al. Effect of cocaine on coronary artery dimensions in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: enhanced vasoconstriction at sites of significant stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:74–79. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90459-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Cornhill JF, et al. Increase in atherosclerosis and adventitial mast cells in cocaine abusers: an alternative mechanism of cocaine-associated coronary vasospasm and thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:1553–1560. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90646-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Aquaro GD, Gabutti A, Meini M, et al. Silent myocardial damage in cocaine addicts. Heart. 2011;97:2056–2062. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2011.226977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Basso C, Marra MP, Thiene G. Cocaine and the heart: more than just coronary disease. Heart. 2011;97:1995–1996. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Prinzmetal M, Kennamer R, Merliss R, et al. Angina Pectoris. I. A variant form of angina pectoris; preliminary report. Am J Med. 1959;27:375–388. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(59)90003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sugiishi M, Takatsu F. Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for CAS. Circulation. 1993;87:76–79. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Crea F, Camici PG, De Caterina A, et al. Chronic ischaemic heart disease. In: Camm AJ, Luscher TF, Serruys P, editors. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 2009. pp. 657–660. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lanza GA, Sestito A, Sgueglia GA, et al. Current clinical features, diagnostic assessment and prognostic determinants of patients with variant angina. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bestetti RB, Costa RS, Zucolotto S, et al. Fatal outcome associated with autopsy proven myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:573–576. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tio RA, Van Gelder IC, Boonstra PW, et al. Myocardial bridging in a survivor of sudden cardiac near-death: role of intracoronary Doppler flow measurements and angiography during dobut-amine stress in the clinical evaluation. Heart. 1997;77:280–282. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cutler D, Wallace JM. Myocardial bridging in a young patient with sudden death. Clin Cardiol. 1997;20:581–583. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bauters C, Chmait A, Tricot O, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Coronary thrombosis and myocardial bridging. Circulation. 2002;105:130. doi: 10.1161/hc0102.100421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tauth J, Sullebarger T. Myocardial infarction associated with myocardial bridging: case history and review of the literature. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;40:364–367. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199704)40:4<364::aid-ccd9>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Arjomand H, AlSalman J, Azain J, et al. Myocardial bridging of left circumflex coronary artery associated with acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000;12:431–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gowda RM, Khan IA, Ansari AQ, et al. Acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction from myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Int J Cardiol. 2003;90:117–118. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00518-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Alegria JR, Herrmann J, Holmes DR, Jr, et al. Myocardial bridging. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1159–1168. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, et al. Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation. 2002;106:2616–2622. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000038420.14867.7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Amplatz K, Anderson R. Angiographic appearance of myocardial bridging of the coronary artery. Invest Radiol. 1968;3:213–215. doi: 10.1097/00004424-196805000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ishimori T, Raizner AE, Chahine RA, et al. Myocardial bridges in man: clinical correlations and angiographic accentuation with nitroglycerin. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1977;3:59–65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810030107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hongo Y, Tada H, Ito K, et al. Augmentation of vessel squeezing at coronary-myocardial bridge by nitroglycerin: study by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J. 1999;138:345–350. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70123-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478–1492. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01175-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, et al. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation. 2002;106:2200–2206. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000035654.18341.5e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, et al. for the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT) Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1058–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC, et al. Predicting coronary heart disease in middle-aged and older persons: the Framingham Study. JAMA. 1977;238:497–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Garcia MJ, McNamara PM, Gordon T, et al. Morbidity and mortality in diabetics in the Framingham population Sixteen-year follow-up study. Diabetes. 1974;23:105–111. doi: 10.2337/diab.23.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1979;59:8–13. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241:2035–2038. doi: 10.1001/jama.241.19.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Perspectives on systolic hypertension: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1980;61:1179–1182. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.61.6.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Shea S, Cook EF, Kannel WB, et al. Treatment of hypertension and its effect on cardiovascular risk factors: data from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1985;71:22–30. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Doyle JT, Dawber TR, Kannel WB, et al. Cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease: combined experience of the Albany and Framingham studies. N Engl J Med. 1962;266:796–801. doi: 10.1056/nejm196204192661602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kannel WB. Cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med. 1964;60:1103–1106. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Thomas HE, Jr, Kannel WB, Dawber TR, et al. Cholesterol-phospholipid ration in the prediction of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med. 1966;274:701–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196603312741302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T, et al. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1971;74:1–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-74-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T. Cholesterol in the prediction of atherosclerotic disease: New perspectives based on the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:85–91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-1-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Schildkraut JM, Myers RH, Cupples L, et al. Coronary risk associated with age and sex of parental heart disease in the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:555–559. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90477-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Maehara A, Mintz GS, Castagna MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:466–468. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02272-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Toggweiler S, Puck M, Thalhammer C, et al. Associated vascular lesions in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13538. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Shamloo BK, Chintala RS, Nasur A, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: aggressive vs. conservative therapy. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:222–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Meader M, Ammann P, Angehrn W, et al. Idiopathic spontaneous coronary artery dissection: incidence, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kadian-Dodov D, Gornik HL, Gu X, et al. Aneurysm and dissection in fibromuscular dsy-plasia: findings from the United States Registry for FMD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:A2113. abstr. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Saw J. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:1027–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Adlam D, Cuculi F, Lim C, et al. Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:549–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fontanelli A, Olivari Z, La Vecchia L, et al. for the DISCOVERY Investigators. Spontaneous dissections of coronary arteries and acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the DISCOVERY, a multicenter prospective registry with a case-control group. J Cardiovasc Med. 2009;10:94–99. doi: 10.2459/jcm.0b013e32830f45c7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Vanzetto G, Berger-Coz E, Barone-Rochette G, et al. Prevalence, therapeutic management and medium-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: results from a database of 11,605 patients. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2009;35:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Koul AK, Hollander G, Moskovits N, et al. Coronary artery dissection during pregnancy and the postpartum period: two case reports and review of the literature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:88–94. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200101)52:1<88::aid-ccd1022>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Asuncion CM, Hyun J. Dissecting intramural hematoma of the coronary artery in pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;40:202–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Abduljalil K, Furness PP, Johnson TN, et al. Anatomical, physiological, and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:365–396. doi: 10.2165/11597440-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Vartun A, et al. A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG. 2010;117:837–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Arnold J, West N, van Gaal W, et al. The role of intravascular ultrasound in the management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ohlmann P, Weigold G, Kim S, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: computed tomographic appearance and insights from intravascular ultrasound examination. Circulation. 2006;113:e403–e405. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.572313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Alfonso F, Paulo M, Gonzalo N, et al. Diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection by optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1073–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Jorgenson MB, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, et al. Spontaneous coronary dissection: a cluster of cases with this rare finding. Am Heart J. 1994;127:1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Maeder M, Ammann P, Angehrn W, et al. Idiopathic spontaneous coronary artery dissection: incidence, diagnosis, and treatment. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zampieri PAS, Roncon L, Rinuncini M, et al. Follow up after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a report of five cases. Heart. 1996;75:206–209. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.2.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Vrints CJ. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Heart. 2010;96:801–808. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.162073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Thompson EA, Ferraris S, Gress T, et al. Gender differences and predictors of mortality in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a review of reported cases. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17:59–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Alfonso F, Paulo M, Lennie V, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: long-term follow-up of a large series of patients prospectively managed with a “conservative” therapeutic strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:1062–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Choi JW, Davidson CJ. Spontaneous multi-vessel coronary dissection in a long-distance runner successfully treated with oral antiplatelet therapy: a case report and review of the literature. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002;14:675–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1920–1959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)” Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:652–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ellis CJ, Haywood GA, Monro JL. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a young woman resulting from an intense gymnasium “work-out”. Int J Cardiol. 1994;47:193–194. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)90191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kalaga RV, Malik A, Thompson PD. Exercise-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection: case report and literature review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1218–1220. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318060114f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. [Accessed July 11, 2014];Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society of America Research Studies. Available at: http://www.fmdsa.org/fmd_info/research_studies.
- 122.Defining the Basis of Fibromuscular Dysplasia (FMD) (DEFINE) [Accessed July 11, 2014];2013 Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01967511.
- 123.Savard S, Steichen O, Azarine A, et al. Association between 2 angiographic subtypes of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia and clinical characteristics. Circulation. 2012;126:3062–3069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Roleder T, Sharma R, Kini AS, et al. Imaging of postpartum coronary artery’s spontaneous dissection treated with stents implantation. Eur J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:503. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]