Skip to main content
BMJ Clinical Evidence logoLink to BMJ Clinical Evidence
. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Vitiligo in adults and children: surgical interventions

Rubeta Matin 1
PMCID: PMC4371616  PMID: 25800413

Abstract

Introduction

Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterised by white (depigmented) patches in the skin, due to the loss of functioning melanocytes. The extent and distribution of vitiligo often changes during the course of a person's lifetime and its progression is unpredictable.

Methods and outcomes

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of surgical interventions for vitiligo in adults and in children? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2014 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results

We found four studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: blister grafts, cultured cellular transplantation, non-cultured cellular transplantation, punch/mini grafts, and split thickness skin grafts.

Key Points

Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterised by white (depigmented) patches in the skin, caused by the loss of functioning melanocytes.

  • Vitiligo patches can appear anywhere on the skin, but common sites are usually around the orifices, the genitals, or sun-exposed areas such as the face and hands.

  • The extent and distribution of vitiligo often changes during the course of a person's lifetime, and its progression is unpredictable.

Vitiligo patches in certain body areas such as the acral sites, palms and soles, lips, mucosa, and nipples, and segmental forms in any area are relatively resistant to all conventional medical treatment modalities. This is thought to be related to the lack of melanocyte reservoir in non-hair bearing sites.

  • In these cases, counselling and cosmetic camouflage become a priority, and often in these sites re-pigmentation is unlikely to be achieved unless surgical methods are used.

There are a variety of medical treatments used for vitiligo, but this review has focused on surgical therapeutic options as this is an expanding field worldwide. Surgery is considered in people with stable vitiligo unresponsive to standard medical therapies.

  • We do not know whether surgical treatments of vitiligo in adults and children (blister grafts, cultured cellular transplantation, non-cultured cellular transplantation, punch/mini grafts, split-thickness skin grafts) are effective, as we found limited evidence from RCTs and systematic reviews. The evidence found was of low or very low quality.

  • We searched for RCTs comparing blister grafts, cultured cellular transplantation, non-cultured cellular transplantation, punch/mini grafts, and split-thickness grafts with no active treatment or with each other.

  • There are significant challenges undertaking robust RCTs assessing surgical treatments, as it is difficult to offer suitable control treatments and the high cost of surgical studies can be limiting.

Clinical context

General background

Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterised by white (depigmented) patches in the skin, caused by the loss of functioning melanocytes. It is difficult to assess the true prevalence of vitiligo as the estimate of prevalence worldwide, between 0.5% and 1.0%, varies according to cultural and social differences. Figures as high as 9% have been reported in India where stigma associated with the disease is high.

Focus of the review

There are a variety of medical treatments used for vitiligo, but this review has focused on surgical therapeutic options as this is an expanding field worldwide. Surgery is considered in people with stable vitiligo unresponsive to standard medical therapies.

Comments on evidence

The evidence found was of low or very low quality. There are significant challenges undertaking robust RCTs assessing surgical treatments, as it is difficult to offer suitable control treatments and the high costs of surgical studies can be limiting .

Search and appraisal summary

The update literature search for this review was carried out from the date of the last search, March 2010, to April 2014. A search back-dated to 1966 was performed for the new options added to the scope at this update. For more information on the electronic databases searched and criteria applied during assessment of studies for potential relevance to the review, please see the Methods section. Searching of electronic databases retrieved 30 studies. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 17 studies and the further review of 13 full publications. Of the 13 full articles evaluated, two systematic reviews and two RCTs were added at this update.

About this condition

Definition

Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterised by white (depigmented) patches in the skin, caused by the loss of functioning melanocytes. The hair, and rarely the eyes, may also lose colour. Vitiligo patches can appear anywhere on the skin but common sites are usually around the orifices, the genitals, or sun-exposed areas such as the face and hands. The disease is classified according to its extent and distribution, and can be subdivided into generalised or localised. In practice, there is considerable overlap between these types, and people often have vitiligo that cannot be categorised or that will change during the course of their lifetime. Therefore, for the purposes of this review, we have included all people diagnosed with vitiligo of any type. Children were defined as people aged 15 years and under. In developing guidelines for the management of vitiligo, a consensus was agreed among clinicians that topical corticosteroid therapy would be chosen as first-line treatment for localised vitiligo (11/14 respondents [79%]), generalised vitiligo (11/14 respondents [79%]), and stable vitiligo (12/14 respondents [86%]). Other treatments options include topical tacrolimus for localised vitiligo and narrowband ultraviolet light B (UVB) or oral psoralen plus ultraviolet light A (PUVA) for moderate to severe generalised vitiligo. Surgery is considered in people with stable vitiligo unresponsive to conservative medical therapies. Stable disease is generally defined as no new lesions, no change in existing lesions, absence of koebnerisation, and spontaneous re-pigmentation. The time period for this is undefined but can range from 6 months to 3 years. The approach taken by surgical therapies is to add melanocytes into the depigmented patches of skin, taken from other pigmented areas. Currently, two types of surgery are considered, tissue grafting or cellular grafting procedures. In this review we have included split-thickness skin grafts, blister grafts, and punch/mini-grafts, which are types of tissue grafting, and cultured and non-cultured cellular transplantation, as types of cellular grafting.

Incidence/ Prevalence

Vitiligo is estimated to affect 1% of the world's population, regardless of age, sex, and skin colour. Anyone of any age can develop vitiligo, but it is very rarely reported present at birth. In a Dutch study, 50% of people reported that the disease appeared before the age of 20 years. It is difficult to assess the true prevalence of vitiligo as the estimate of prevalence worldwide varies between 0.5% and 1.0% according to cultural and social differences. In countries where more stigma is attached to the disease for cultural or social reasons, or because it is more visible due to dark skin colour, more people with the disease are likely to consult a doctor than in other countries where this is not the case, thus reported estimates of prevalence may be high. Figures as high as 9% have been reported in India where stigma associated with the disease is high.

Aetiology/ Risk factors

The aetiology of vitiligo is uncertain, although genetic, immunological, biochemical (including oxidative stress), and neurogenic factors may interact to contribute to its development. Although there are few epidemiological studies of vitiligo, it is believed that one third of people with vitiligo report close family members affected by the disorder, suggesting that genetic factors have an important role in the development of the disease. This is supported by several genetic susceptibility studies. In particular, NALP-1 predisposes people to vitiligo as well as to various autoimmune diseases. However, certain triggers (e.g., trauma to the skin, hormonal changes, and stress) may be necessary for the disease to become apparent. Autoimmune mechanisms are thought to be responsible in the pathogenesis of vitiligo (especially in generalised or focal non-dermatomal vitiligo). This is supported by an increased incidence of antibodies found in people with vitiligo. Furthermore, vitiligo is often associated with autoimmune diseases, such as thyroid diseases, pernicious anaemia, and diabetes mellitus. Another indication that vitiligo may be caused by an autoimmune mechanism is that melanocyte antibodies have been found in people with vitiligo, and their incidence correlates with disease activity. Involvement of cellular immunity has been considered because T lymphocytes and macrophages in peri-lesional skin have also been frequently reported. Regarding segmental vitiligo, the neural hypothesis suggests that it is caused by an accumulation of a neurochemical substance, which decreases melanin production.

Prognosis

Vitiligo is not life threatening and is mostly asymptomatic, although it does increase the risk of sunburn of the affected areas due to the absence of melanocytic photo-protection. The association of vitiligo and skin cancer remains an area of controversy. The occurrence of skin cancer in long-lasting vitiligo is rare, although studies have demonstrated increased PUVA-associated skin cancers. A Swedish study that followed up people treated with PUVA over 21 years for a range of benign skin conditions demonstrated an increased risk of squamous cell carcinomas. Furthermore, the risk of malignant melanoma increases among people treated with PUVA by approximately 15 years after the first treatment. The effects of vitiligo can be both cosmetically and psychologically devastating, resulting in low self-esteem and poor body image. The anxieties regarding the disease exist against a background of a lack of understanding of the aetiology and unpredictability of the course. Progression The course of generalised vitiligo is unpredictable; lesions may remain stable for years or (more commonly) may progress alternating with phases of stabilisation, or (less commonly) may slowly progress for several years to cover the entire body surface. In some instances, people may undergo rapid, complete depigmentation within 1 or 2 years. In segmental vitiligo, lesions tend to spread rapidly at onset and show a more stable course thereafter. Predicting treatment responsiveness Certain disease characteristics help predict the outcome of treatment. Besides age, duration of disease, localisation, and extent of depigmentation, current disease activity should also be considered during clinical decision making. This is essential in people with vitiligo vulgaris, when the disease activity may fluctuate at a given time. Medical therapies and ultraviolet light treatments may be equally effective in active and stable disease. Surgical therapies can be effective interventions for vitiligo, but are limited by the fact that they are invasive and require significant training and expertise to be performed successfully. Surgical treatments are contraindicated in patients who have a history of hypertrophic or keloid scars. An associated skin manifestation is the phenomenon of koebnerisation, where pressure or friction on the skin can cause new lesions or worsen existing ones. Koebnerisation occurs in most people with vitiligo, but elimination of frictional trauma, in the form of occlusive garments and jewellery, prevents occurrence of new lesions in the cosmetically important areas in cases of progressive vitiligo. Also, it has been reported that the presence of positive experimentally induced Koebner phenomenon is associated with active disease, but not necessarily more severe disease (that is, in terms of the extent of depigmentation). The presence of Koebner phenomenon may be a valuable clinical factor for assessing disease activity, and may predict responsiveness to certain treatments. A case series reported that people who were Koebner phenomenon-positive (induced experimentally) were significantly more responsive to topical fluticasone propionate combined with UVA therapy; but, for narrowband UVB treatment, there was no difference in response, suggesting that people in active and stable stages of the disease may respond equally well to UVB.

Aims of intervention

To prevent formation of new skin lesions of the vitiligo; to achieve re-pigmentation of involved skin, thus improving the quality of life, with minimal adverse effects.

Outcomes

Treatment success (re-pigmentation) the degree of re-pigmentation that defines success has been arbitrarily set in many studies as 50% to 75% re-pigmentation, based largely on the global impression of the overall response. Disease progression, including development of new lesions and arrest of vitiligo spread. There is currently no validated quantitative scale that allows vitiligo to be characterised parametrically, but a model was developed in one RCT of a novel parametric tool, which, if used by clinicians, could provide a more quantifiable comparison of the effects of different interventions. Quality of life measured using a validated tool. Adverse effects.

Methods

BMJ Clinical Evidence search and appraisal April 2014. The following databases were used to identify studies for this systematic review: Medline 1966 to April 2014, Embase 1980 to April 2014, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 4, 2014 (1966 to date of issue). Additional searches were carried out in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. We also searched for retractions of studies included in the review. Titles and abstracts of the studies identified by the initial search, run by an information specialist, were first assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence scanner. Full texts for potentially relevant studies were then assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence analyst. Studies selected for inclusion were discussed with an expert contributor. All data relevant to the review were then extracted by an evidence analyst. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were published RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs in the English language, any level of blinding, and containing at least 20 individuals (at least 10 per arm), of whom at least 80% were followed up. There was no minimum length of follow-up. We included RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs where harms of an included intervention were assessed, applying the same study design criteria for inclusion as we did for benefits. In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the FDA and the MHRA, which are added to the reviews as required. To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs). We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table). The categorisation of the quality of the evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) reflects the quality of evidence available for our chosen outcomes in our defined populations of interest. These categorisations are not necessarily a reflection of the overall methodological quality of any individual study, because the Clinical Evidence population and outcome of choice may represent only a small subset of the total outcomes reported, and population included, in any individual trial. For further details of how we perform the GRADE evaluation and the scoring system we use, please see our website (www.clinicalevidence.com).

Table.

GRADE Evaluation of interventions for Vitiligo in adults and children: surgical interventions.

Important outcomes Disease progression, Quality of life, Treatment success
Studies (Participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of surgical treatments for vitiligo in adults and children?
1 (20) Treatment success Blister grafts versus split thickness skin grafts 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality point deducted for sparse data and absolute numbers not reported; directness point deducted for applicability of results
1 (41) Treatment success Blister grafts versus non-cultured cellular transplantation 4 –1 –1 –1 0 Very low Quality point deducted for sparse data; consistency point deducted for different results depending on outcome measured; directness point deducted for use of co-intervention
1 (41) Quality of life Blister grafts versus non-cultured cellular transplantation 4 –1 0 –1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data; directness point deducted for use of co-intervention
1 (28) Treatment success Non-cultured cellular transplantation plus ultraviolet light versus placebo plus ultraviolet light 4 –2 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and absolute numbers not reported; directness points deducted for applicability of results and use of co-intervention
1 (64) Treatment success Punch/mini grafts plus PUVAsol versus split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol 4 –1 0 –1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data; directness point deducted for use of co-intervention

We initially allocate 4 points to evidence from RCTs, and 2 points to evidence from observational studies. To attain the final GRADE score for a given comparison, points are deducted or added from this initial score based on preset criteria relating to the categories of quality, directness, consistency, and effect size. Quality: based on issues affecting methodological rigour (e.g., incomplete reporting of results, quasi-randomisation, sparse data [<200 people in the analysis]). Consistency: based on similarity of results across studies. Directness: based on generalisability of population or outcomes. Effect size: based on magnitude of effect as measured by statistics such as relative risk, odds ratio, or hazard ratio.

Glossary

Active vitiligo

An extending vitiligo with enlarging lesions or development of new lesions.

Generalised vitiligo

Characterised by multiple scattered lesions in a symmetrical distribution pattern. It occurs in acrofacial, periorifacial, and orifacial types, in which the distal extremities and face are involved. In the universal form, there is more than 80% depigmentation.

Koebner phenomenon

The development of vitiligo at sites of aspecifically traumatised skin.

Localised vitiligo

can consist either of focal lesions (macules appear in a non-dermatomal distribution) or a segmental form (macules are localised in a segmental distribution that is frequently not dermatomal, commonly seen in children).

Low-quality evidence

Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Narrowband ultraviolet B

310 nm to 315 nm wavelength ultraviolet radiation.

PUVA

Combination therapy of ultraviolet A and topical or oral psoralen. The psoralen sensitises the skin to ultraviolet A and is taken or is applied a set period of time before the ultraviolet A exposure.

PUVAsol

A combination topical or oral psoralen with natural sunlight exposure.

Parametrically

A set of measurable factors that define a condition and determine its course which are varied in a trial.

Segmental vitiligo

A form of localised vitiligo where one or more lesions of vitiligo can arise.

Ultraviolet A

315 nm to 400 nm ultraviolet radiation.

Very low-quality evidence

Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

Vitiligo vulgaris

A symmetrical type of generalised vitiligo in which scattered macules are seen over the entire body.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.

References

  • 1.Njoo MD, Westerhof MD, Bos JD, et al. The development of guidelines for the treatment of vitiligo. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1514–1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perrot JL. Thyreopathies et autoimmunisation. Lyon Med 1973;230:325–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Srivastava G. Vitiligo update. Asian Clin Dermatol 1994;1:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Westerhof W, Bolhaar B, Menke HE, et al. Resultaten van een enquete onder vitiligo patienten. Ned Tjdschr Dermatol Venereol 1996;6:100–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whitton ME, Pinart M, Batchelor J, et al. Interventions for vitiligo. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2009. 20091542 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Behl PN, Bhatia RK. 400 cases of vitiligo. A clinico-therapeutic analysis Indian J Dermatol 1972;17:51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schallreuter KU, Bahadoran P, Picardo M, etal. Vitiligo pathogenesis: autoimmune disease, genetic defect, excessive reactive oxygen species, calcium imbalance, or what else? Exp Dermatol 2008;17:139–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Spritz RA. The genetics of generalized vitiligo and associated autoimmune diseases. Pigment Cell Research 2007;20:271–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Westerhof W, d'Ischia M. Vitiligo puzzle: the pieces fall in place. Pigment Cell Res 207;20:345–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bhatia PS, Mohan L, Pandey ON, et al. Genetic nature of vitiligo. J Dermatol Sci 1992;4:180–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fain PR, Gowan K, LaBerge GS, et al. A genomewide screen for generalised vitiligo: confirmation of AIS1 on chromosome 1p31 and evidence for additional susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1560–1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spritz RA, Gowan K, Bennett DC, et al. Novel vitiligo susceptibility loci on chromosomes 7 (AIS2) and 8 (AIS3), confirmation of SLEVI on chromosome 17, and their role in autoimmune diathesis. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:188–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jin Y, Mailloux CM, Gowan K, et al. NALP1 in vitiligo-associated multiple autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med 2011;356:1216–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Al'Abadie MS, Kent GG, Gawkrodger DJ. The relationship between stress and the onset and exacerbation of psoriasis and other skin conditions. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:199–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Papadopoulos L, Bor R, Legg C, et al. Impact of life events on the onset of vitiligo in adults: preliminary evidence for a psychological dimension in aetiology. Clin Exp Dermatol 1998;23:243–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ongenae K, Van Geel N, Naeyaert JM. Evidence for an autoimmune pathogenesis of vitiligo. Pigment Cell Res 2003;16:90–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mosher DB, Fitzpatrick TB, Ortonne JP, et al. Disorders in pigmentation. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al, eds. Dermatology in general medicine. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1987:810–821. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rezaei N Gavalas NG, Weetman AP, Kemp EH. Autoimmunity as an aetiological factor in vitiligo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:865–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mishima Y, Kawasaki H, Pinkus H. Dendritic cell dynamics in progressive depigmentations. Arch Dermatol Forsch 1972;243:67–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brostoff J. Autoantibodies in patients with vitiligo. Lancet 1969;2:177–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Foley LM, Lowe NJ, Misheloff E, et al. Association of HLA-DR4 with vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;8:39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naughton GK, Eisinger M, Bystryn JC. Detection of antibodies to melanocytes in vitiligo by specific immunoprecipitation. J Invest Dermatol 1983;81:540–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seo SL, Kim IH. Squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with generalised vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45(6 suppl):S227–S229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lindelof B, Sigurgeirsson B, Tegner E, et al. PUVA and cancer risk: the Swedish follow-up study. Br J Dermatol 1999;141:108–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stern RS, Nichols KT, Vakeva LH. Malignant melanoma in patients treated for psoriasis with methoxsalen (psoralen) and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA). The PUVA follow-up study. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1041–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lerner AB, Nordlund JJ. Vitiligo. What is it? Is it important? JAMA 1978;239:1183–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Papadopoulos L, Bor R, Legg C. Coping with the disfiguring effects of vitiligo: a preliminary investigation into the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy. Br J Med Psychol 1999;72:385–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Porter J, Beuf AH, Nordlund JJ, et al. Psychological reaction to chronic skin disorders: a study of patients with vitiligo. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1979;1:73–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Njoo MD, Westerhof W. Vitiligo: pathogenesis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001;2:167–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grimes PE. New insights and new therapies in vitiligo. JAMA 2005;293:730–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ortonne JP. Vitiligo. In: Ortonne JP, ed. Vitiligo and other hypomelanoses of hair and skin. New York, NY: Plenum Medical Books, 1983:163–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antoniou C, Katsambas A. Guidelines for the treatment of vitiligo. Drugs 1992;43:490–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, et al. Guidelines of care for vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:620–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grimes PE. Vitiligo: an overview of therapeutic approaches. Dermatol Clin 1993;11:325–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mulekar SV, Isedeh P. Surgical interventions for vitiligo: an evidence-based review. Br J Dermatol 2013;169(suppl 3):57–66. Search date February 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koebner H. Zur aetologie der Psoriasis. Vierteljahrsschr Dermatol Syphil 1877;8:559. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kaposi M. Vitiligo. In: Pathologie et traitement des maladies de peau. Paris, France: Masson; 1891:105–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Beetley F. The provocation of cutaneous disease: Koebner's isomorphic phenomenon. Arch Middx Hosp 1951;1:279–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Khalid M, Mujtaba G, Haroon TS. Comparison of 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream and topical Puvasol in childhood vitiligo. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:203–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schallreuter KU, Lemke R, Brandt O, et al. Vitiligo and other diseases: coexistence or true association? Dermatology 1994;188:269–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barona MI, Arrunategui A, Falabella R, et al. An epidemiologic case-control study in a population with vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;33:621–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Njoo MD, Das PK, Bos JD, et al. Association of the Koebner phenomenon with disease activity and therapeutic responsiveness in vitiligo vulgaris. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:407–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lepe V, Moncada B, Castanedo-Cazares JP, et al. A double-blind randomized trial of 0.1% tacrolimus vs 0.05% clobetasol for the treatment of childhood vitiligo. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:581–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hamzavi I, Jain H, McLean D, et al. Parametric modeling of narrowband UV-B phototherapy for vitiligo using a novel quantitative tool: the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. Arch Dermatol 2004;140:677–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Budania A, Parsad D, Kanwar AJ, et al. Comparison between autologous noncultured epidermal cell suspension and suction blister epidermal grafting in stable vitiligo: a randomized study. Br J Dermatol 2012;167:1295–1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen YF, Yang PY, Hu DN, et al. Treatment of vitiligo by transplantation of cultured pure melanocyte suspension: analysis of 120 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:68–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Piangiani E, Risulo M, Andreassi A, et al. Autologous epidermal cultures and narrow-band ultraviolet B in the surgical treatment of vitiligo. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:155–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Geel N, Ongenae K, De Mil M, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled study of autologous transplanted epidermal cell suspensions for repigmenting vitiligo. Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1203–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Njoo MD, Bos JD, Westerhof W. Treatment of generalised vitiligo in children with narrowband (TL-01) UVB radiation therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pathak MA, Mosher DB, Fitzpatrick TB. Safety and therapeutic effectiveness of 8-methoxypsoralen, 4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen, and psoralen in vitiligo. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1984;66:165–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tjioe M, Gerritsen MJ, Juhlin L, et al. Treatment of vitiligo vulgaris with narrow band UVB (311 nm) for one year and the effect of addition of folic acid and vitamin B12. Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:369–372. [Erratum in: Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:485] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Blister grafts

Summary

We do not know whether blister grafts are effective compared with placebo/no treatment or the other surgical interventions included in this review for people with vitiligo, as we found insufficient evidence from RCTs.

Benefits and harms

Blister grafts versus placebo or no treatment:

We found no systematic review or RCTs.

Blister grafts versus split thickness skin grafts:

We found two systematic reviews (search dates 2009; and 2013), which both identified the same RCT.

Treatment success

Blister grafts versus split-thickness skin grafts We don’t know how blister grafts and split-thickness skin grafts compare at increasing re-pigmentation (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Re-pigmentation

Systematic review
20 people (aged 10–49 years) with generalised vitiligo for at least 1 year with patches on body sites not exposed to the sunlight
Data from 1 RCT
Proportion showing re-pigmentation 3 months
45% with blister grafts
65% with split-thickness grafts
Absolute numbers not reported

Not reported

Disease progression

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Quality of life

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

Systematic review
20 people (aged 10–49 years) with generalised vitiligo for at least 1 year with patches on body sites not exposed to the sunlight
Data from 1 RCT
Adverse effects
with blister grafts
with skin-thickness skin grafts

Blister grafts versus non-cultured cellular transplantation:

We found two systematic reviews (search dates 2009; and 2013), which found no RCTs. We found one additional RCT.

Treatment success

Blister grafts versus non-cultured cellular transplantation Non-cultured cellular transplantation may be more effective than blister grafts at increasing re-pigmentation at 16 weeks when undertaken in combination with variable daily sunlight exposure; however, the result varied with the analysis used and this is based on one small RCT (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Re-pigmentation

RCT
41 people (12–40 years, 54 lesions) with stable vitiligo for at least 1 year not responding to medical therapy Re-pigmentation 90%–100% 16 weeks
7/26 (27%) lesions with blister grafts (20 people)
20/28 (71%) lesions with non-cultured cellular transplantation (21 people)

P = 0.002
Effect size not calculated non-cultured cellular transplantation

RCT
41 people (12–40 years, 54 lesions) with stable vitiligo for at least 1 year not responding to medical therapy Re-pigmentation at least 75% 16 weeks
22/26 (85%) lesions with blister grafts (20 people)
25/28 (89%) lesions with non-cultured cellular transplantation (21 people)

P = 0.61
Not significant

Disease progression

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Quality of life

Blister grafts versus non-cultured cellular transplantation Non-cultured cellular transplantation may be more effective than blister grafts at improving quality of life at 16 weeks; however, this is based on one small RCT (low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Quality of life

RCT
41 people (12–40 years, 54 lesions) with stable vitiligo for at least 1 year not responding to medical therapy Mean reduction from baseline in quality of life (assessed using Dermatology Life Quality Index) 16 weeks
6.80 with blister grafts
9.12 with non-cultured cellular transplantation

P = 0.045
Effect size not calculated non-cultured cellular transplantation

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hyperpigmentation

RCT
41 people (12–40 years, 54 lesions) with stable vitiligo for at least 1 year not responding to medical therapy Hyperpigmentation 16 weeks
3/26 (12%) lesions with blister grafts (20 people)
4/28 (14%) lesions with non-cultured cellular transplantation (21 people)

Not reported
Hypopigmentation

RCT
41 people (12–40 years, 54 lesions) with stable vitiligo for at least 1 year not responding to medical therapy Hypopigmentation 16 weeks
5/26 (19%) lesions with blister grafts (20 people)
2/28 (7%) lesions with non-cultured cellular transplantation (21 people)

Not reported

Further information on studies

All participants were asked to expose the areas to sunlight from 5 to 30 minutes daily. The study was conducted in India.

Comment

It is important to remember that, in studies using sunlight as the source of UVA variable factors (compliance, degree of sun exposure, country where the trial was conducted) can limit the interpretation and applicability of results.

Clinical guide

Non-cultured cellular transplantation could be used in adolescents and adults to treat stable vitiligo that is unresponsive to medical therapies.

Substantive changes

Blister grafts New option. Two systematic reviews and one additional RCT added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Cultured cellular transplantation

Summary

We don’t know how cultured cellular transplantation compares with no active treatment or with other surgical interventions, as we found no RCTs.

Benefits and harms

Cultured cellular transplantation versus placebo:

We found two systematic reviews (search dates 2009; and 2013), which found no RCTs.

Cultured cellular transplantation versus other surgical interventions:

We found no systematic review or RCTs.

Comment

Cultured cellular transplantation requires laboratory equipment and expertise, which is thought to enhance the efficacy of transplanted melanocytes in vitiligo. The percentage of re-pigmentation has been reported in prospective studies to range from 75% to 84% in patients with focal or stable vitiligo and between 30% to 54% in those with generalised vitiligo.

Clinical guide

There are no RCTs to provide guidance for clinical use of cultured cellular transplants.

Substantive changes

Cultured cellular transplantation New option. Two systematic reviews added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Non-cultured cellular transplantation

Summary

The evidence for non-cultured cellular transplantation is limited and we found no studies assessing non-cultured cellular transplantation alone.

Non-cultured cellular transplantation plus ultraviolet light may be more effective than placebo plus ultraviolet light at increasing re-pigmentation at 12 months. However, this is based on one small RCT.

Benefits and harms

Non-cultured cellular transplantation plus ultraviolet light versus placebo plus ultraviolet light:

We found two systematic reviews (search dates 2009; and 2013), which both identified the same RCT but as they do not report the results in much detail, data have been extracted directly from the RCT.

Treatment success

Non-cultured cellular transplantation plus ultraviolet light versus placebo plus ultraviolet light Non-cultured cellular transplantation may be more effective than placebo when used in conjunction with UV light at increasing re-pigmentation at 12 months; however, this is based on one small RCT (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Re-pigmentation

RCT
28 people (aged 15–65 years) with vitiligo (19 with clinically stable vitiligo defined as no progression in previous 12 months, and 9 with indications of disease activity)
In review
Re-pigmentation 12 months
with non-cultured cellular transplantation
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

P = 0.002
Effect size not calculated non-cultured cellular transplantation

Disease progression

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Quality of life

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hyperpigmentation

RCT
28 people (aged 15–65 years) with vitiligo (19 with clinically stable vitiligo defined as no progression in previous 12 months, and 9 with indications of disease activity)
In review
Hyperpigmentation 12 months
with non-cultured cellular transplantation
with placebo

Not reported

Non-cultured cellular transplantation versus blister grafts:

See option on Blister grafts.

Further information on studies

In this RCT, non-cultured cellular transplantation consisted of melanocyte medium, hyaluronic acid, and epidermal cells, while the placebo group received only the melanocyte medium and hyaluronic acid. Each participant received treatment and placebo interventions on different lesions. Moreover, four participants received treatment and placebo at four sites in total. No lesions on the face or neck were included in this study. The mean surface area of lesions was 2.8 cm2 for actively treated lesions (range 0.2–8.9 cm2); and 2.9 cm2 for the placebo treated lesions (range 0.6– 8.1 cm2). Three weeks after the procedure, all patients received UVB irradiation or PUVA twice-weekly for 2 months. The method for allocation to the different types of UV treatment and responses according to the different types of post-procedure UV therapy was not reported in the RCT. Significant differences in re-pigmentation in favour of non-cultured cellular transplantation were also reported between lesions treated with non-cultured cellular transplantation and those treated with placebo at 3 months (P <0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.002). Only three participants in the placebo-treated sites experienced re-pigmentation in at least 20% of the area. In two out three of these, it was suggestive of post-inflammatory pigmentation. The study was conducted in Belgium.

Comment

The safe duration of narrowband UVB and maximum cumulative dose compared with other treatment modalities remains undetermined, but the consensus is that this form of treatment is safe and effective in children, and may improve their quality of life. UVB phototherapy has the advantage of not requiring photo-protective goggles post-treatment. Furthermore, there is consensus that the risk of developing skin cancers from light treatments is lowest with narrowband UVB and highest with PUVA. In general, PUVA is not recommended for children under the age of 12 years.

Clinical guide

Non-cultured cellular transplantation can be used to treat reasonably small-sized areas of stable vitiligo in both children and adults. However it has the potential to treat larger areas (up to 10 times the donor area), without the need for cell cultures. This treatment does, however, require laboratory support. Long-term results are lacking.

Substantive changes

Non-cultured cellular transplantation New option. Two systematic reviews added and one RCT. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Punch/mini grafts

Summary

The evidence for mini-punch grafts is limited and we found no studies assessing punch/mini grafts alone or comparing them with no active treatment.

Mini-punch grafts plus PUVAsol may not be as effective as split thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol at increasing re-pigmentation at 3 months; however, we don’t know about long-term re-pigmentation, and this is based on one small RCT.

It should be noted that, in general, PUVA is not recommended for children under the age of 12 years. Results from studies including PUVA as an intervention carried out in mixed-age groups should not be extrapolated to children.

Larger areas of vitiligo can be treated using split-thickness skin grafts compared with mini-punch grafts, but this may be at the cost of increased adverse effects (with the exception of graft failure). Graft rejection in mini-punch grafts is higher than that reported for split-thickness skin grafts. Other possible adverse events of mini-punch grafts include cobblestoning of the graft and poor cosmesis.

In clinical practice, size of lesions of vitiligo and extent of area involved will determine choice of grafting.

Benefits and harms

Punch/mini grafts versus placebo or no treatment:

We found no systematic reviews or RCTs.

Punch/mini grafts plus PUVAsol versus split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol:

We found two systematic reviews (search dates 2009; and 2013), which both identified the same RCT.

Treatment success

Punch/mini grafts plus PUVAsol versus split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol Split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol may be more effective than mini-punch grafts plus PUVAsol at increasing re-pigmentation at 3 months; however, we do not know if they are more effective in the longer term, and this is based on one small RCT (low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Re-pigmentation

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Proportion showing re-pigmentation (>75%) 3 months
15/34 (44%) with mini-punch grafts
25/30 (83%) with split-thickness skin grafts

RR 1.89
95% CI 1.25 to 2.85
P value not reported
Small effect size split-thickness skin grafts

Disease progression

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Quality of life

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hypertrophic scarring

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Hypertrophic scarring 3 months
0/34 (0%) with mini-punch grafts
3/30 (10%) with split-thickness skin grafts

P value not reported
Rejection of grafts

Systematic review
797 grafts in 64 people (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Graft rejection 3 months
81/644 (13%) with mini-punch grafts (n = 34)
7/153 (5%) with split-thickness skin grafts (n = 30)

Not reported
Graft depigmentation

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Graft depigmentation 3 months
0/34 (0%) with mini-punch grafts
2/30 (7%) with split-thickness skin grafts

Not reported
Graft contracture

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Graft contracture 3 months
0/34 (0%) with mini-punch grafts
2/30 (10%) with split-thickness skin grafts

Not reported
Milia formation

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Milia formation 3 months
0/34 (0%) with mini-punch grafts
4/30 (13%) with split-thickness skin grafts

Not reported
Achromic fissuring

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Achromic fissuring 3 months
0/34 (0%) with mini-punch grafts
4/30 (13%) with split-thickness skin grafts

Not reported
Cobblestoning

Systematic review
64 adults and children (aged 10–42 years) with stable localised vitiligo for 1–18 years with lesions resistant to conventional medical therapy and remaining unchanged (no progression or regression) for at least 6 months
Data from 1 RCT
Cobblestoning 3 months
7/34 (21%) with mini-punch grafts
0/30 (0%) with split-thickness skin grafts

Not reported

Further information on studies

The people included in the RCT ranged from 10 to 42 years old with a mean age of 19.9 years in the mini-punch graft arm and 22.6 years in the split thickness skin graft arm. In the mini-punch graft group, 2.5 mm grafts were obtained from the upper thigh after infiltrating the area with 2% lignocaine without adrenaline. The grafts were then transplanted to the depigmented areas, from which similar-sized circles of skin had been removed. In the split-thickness skin grafts group, the grafts were obtained from the thigh region after scrutiny for scars, striae, or infection. The split-thickness grafts ranged from approximately 1 to 18 cm2. After 2 weeks, once the grafts were accepted, the participants underwent PUVAsol therapy (oral psoralen, followed 2 hours later by sun exposure) on alternate days for 3 months. The study was conducted in India.

Comment

PUVA (oral) treatment duration

Long-term therapy is needed for successful re-pigmentation of vitiliginous skin. Between 15 and 25 treatments are necessary before perifollicular re-pigmentation is apparent. Between 100 and 300 treatments are required for complete re-pigmentation of the neck, trunk, and proximal limbs, with the face re-pigmenting faster. At 4 years’ follow-up, people neither developed cutaneous malignancies nor developed abnormal liver function values.

UVA source

It is important to remember that, in studies using sunlight as the source of UVA, variable factors (compliance, degree of sun exposure, country where the trial was conducted) can limit the interpretation and applicability of results. Where possible, reliable forms of light therapy such as UV light devices should be used in trials, but this is not always accessible or feasible in resource-poor countries. No RCTs have been carried out using different UVA light devices.

PUVA in children

In general, PUVA is not recommended for children under the age of 12 years. Results from studies including PUVA as an intervention carried out in mixed-age groups should not be extrapolated to children. The phototoxic potential of psoralens is of great concern in children, where avoidance of excessive sun exposure may be difficult to regulate. PUVA therapy is not advocated in children under the age of 12 years because of the risk of cataract formation (because the eye is not fully developed until the age of 12 years) and because of the increased risk of skin cancer.

Clinical guide

Mini-punch grafts plus PUVAsol are less effective than split-thickness skin graft plus PUVAsol at increasing re-pigmentation in the short term. Larger areas of vitiligo can be treated using split-thickness skin grafts, but at the cost of increased adverse effects (with the exception of graft failure). Size of lesions of vitiligo and extent of area involved will determine choice of grafting.

Substantive changes

Punch/mini grafts New option. Two systematic reviews added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 20;2015:1717.

Split-thickness skin grafts

Summary

The evidence for split-thickness skin grafts is limited. We found no studies assessing split thickness skin grafts compared with no active treatment, and we found only one small RCT of split thickness skin grafts alone, which compared them with blister grafts.

Split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol may be more effective than mini-punch grafts plus PUVAsol at increasing re-pigmentation at 3 months; however, we don’t know about longer term re-pigmentation.

Split-thickness skin grafts can be used to treat large areas of vitiligo. However, they may incur significant side effects, including milia formation, graft contractures, graft depigmentation, and achromic fissuring.

Benefits and harms

Split-thickness skin grafts versus placebo or no treatment:

We found no systematic review or RCTs.

Split-thickness skin grafts versus blister grafts:

See option on Blister grafts.

Split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol versus punch/mini grafts plus PUVAsol:

See option on Punch/mini grafts.

Comment

In studies using sunlight as the source of UVA variable factors (compliance, degree of sun exposure, country where the trial was conducted) can limit the interpretation and applicability of results. Where possible, reliable forms of light therapy such as UV light devices should be used in trials, but this is not always accessible or feasible in resource-poor countries.

Clinical guide

Split-thickness skin grafts plus PUVAsol are more effective than mini-punch grafts plus PUVAsol at increasing re-pigmentation in the short term. Larger areas of vitiligo can be treated using split-thickness skin grafts, but at the cost of increased adverse effects (with the exception of graft failure). Size of lesions of vitiligo and extent of area involved will determine choice of grafting.

Substantive changes

Split-thickness skin grafts New option. Two systematic reviews added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.


Articles from BMJ Clinical Evidence are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES