Significance
Plants make a wide variety of complex molecules with potent biological activities including several anticancer therapeutics. Unfortunately, plants often produce these molecules in low amounts, making them expensive to obtain. Engineering simpler organisms, such as yeast, to produce these plant-derived compounds provides one solution to production challenges. One group of plant-derived molecules, the monoterpene indole alkaloids, is synthesized from a common intermediate, strictosidine. Here, we report how we developed a yeast strain that produces strictosidine. This required introducing 21 new genes and three gene deletions into the yeast genome. This yeast strain provides an important resource for the production of expensive, complex molecules that plants normally produce in small amounts.
Keywords: monoterpene indole alkaloid, strictosidine, secologanin, Catharanthus roseus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Abstract
The monoterpene indole alkaloids are a large group of plant-derived specialized metabolites, many of which have valuable pharmaceutical or biological activity. There are ∼3,000 monoterpene indole alkaloids produced by thousands of plant species in numerous families. The diverse chemical structures found in this metabolite class originate from strictosidine, which is the last common biosynthetic intermediate for all monoterpene indole alkaloid enzymatic pathways. Reconstitution of biosynthetic pathways in a heterologous host is a promising strategy for rapid and inexpensive production of complex molecules that are found in plants. Here, we demonstrate how strictosidine can be produced de novo in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae host from 14 known monoterpene indole alkaloid pathway genes, along with an additional seven genes and three gene deletions that enhance secondary metabolism. This system provides an important resource for developing the production of more complex plant-derived alkaloids, engineering of nonnatural derivatives, identification of bottlenecks in monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis, and discovery of new pathway genes in a convenient yeast host.
Monoterpene indole alkaloids (MIAs) are a diverse family of complex nitrogen-containing plant-derived metabolites (1, 2). This metabolite class is found in thousands of plant species from the Apocynaceae, Loganiaceae, Rubiaceae, Icacinaceae, Nyssaceae, and Alangiaceae plant families (2, 3). Many MIAs and MIA derivatives have medicinal properties; for example, vinblastine, vincristine, and vinflunine are approved anticancer therapeutics (4, 5). These structurally complex compounds can be difficult to chemically synthesize (6, 7). Consequently, industrial production relies on extraction from the plant, but these compounds are often produced in small quantities as complex mixtures, making isolation challenging, laborious, and expensive (8–10). Reconstitution of plant pathways in microbial hosts is proving to be a promising approach to access plant-derived compounds as evidenced by the successful production of terpenes, flavonoids, and benzylisoquinoline alkaloids in microorganisms (11–19). Microbial hosts can also be used to construct hybrid biosynthetic pathways to generate modified natural products with potentially enhanced bioactivities (8, 20, 21). Across numerous plant species, strictosidine is believed to be the core scaffold from which all 3,000 known MIAs are derived (1, 2). Strictosidine undergoes a variety of redox reactions and rearrangements to form the thousands of compounds that comprise the MIA natural product family (Fig. 1) (1, 2). Due to the importance of strictosidine, the last common biosynthetic intermediate for all known MIAs, we chose to focus on heterologous production of this complex molecule (1). Therefore, strictosidine reconstitution represents the necessary first step for heterologous production of high-value MIAs.
Fig. 1.
Strictosidine, the central intermediate in monoterpene indole alkaloid (MIA) biosynthesis, undergoes a series of reactions to produce over 3,000 known MIAs such as vincristine, quinine, and strychnine.
Results
Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are the most common choices for a heterologous microbial host for plant metabolite production because of the short generation times and the abundance of available genetic tools for these organisms (21, 22). We chose to use S. cerevisiae as a host because functional expression of microsomal plant P450s has more precedence in yeast (23). Additionally, plants exhibit extensive intracellular compartmentalization of their metabolic pathways (24), and the impact that this compartmentalization has on alkaloid biosynthesis can only be explored further in a eukaryotic host (25). To enhance genetic stability, we used homologous recombination to integrate the necessary biosynthetic genes under the control of strong constitutive promoters (TDH3, ADH1, TEF1, PGK1, TPI1) into the S. cerevisiae genome (Fig. S1).
Strictosidine, like all monoterpenes, is derived from geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) (Fig. 2) (24). In S. cerevisiae GPP is synthesized via the mevalonate pathway by the condensation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP). To increase flux through the IPP/DMAPP pathway in the yeast host, we combined several previously reported approaches (Fig. 2): (i) we integrated a truncated HMG-CoA reductase gene (tHMGR), which encodes a non–feedback-regulated rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway (16); (ii) we installed a second copy of IDI1, the gene encoding IPP isomerase to increase DMAPP formation (26); (iii) because IPP is a common substrate for both GPP and tRNA synthesis, we integrated a second copy of MAF1, a negative regulator of tRNA synthesis, to direct IPP away from tRNA synthesis and into GPP production (27). However, although farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) production for sesquiterpene biosynthesis has been extensively optimized in S. cerevisiae, GPP production requires additional metabolic engineering because S. cerevisiae does not naturally produce GPP. The S. cerevisiae ERG20 gene encodes a farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) that, although having both GPP and FPP synthase activity, does not release GPP from its catalytic site (28). Therefore, to synthesize free GPP we incorporated AgGPPS2, a GPP-specific synthase from grand fir (Abies grandis), into this S. cerevisiae strain (29). To further enhance GPP yields, we replaced the native ERG20 gene with mFPS144, a previously reported mutant FPPS (N144W mutation) from Gallus gallus, which has a much greater GPP synthase activity relative to FPP synthase activity (30).
Fig. 2.
The reconstituted S. cerevisiae strictosidine biosynthetic pathway. C. roseus genes (orange) were integrated into the S. cerevisiae genome to allow for strictosidine production. To increase flux through the pathway, second copies of native S. cerevisiae genes (gray) were integrated into the genome. The gray line indicates MAF1 is a repressor of tRNA biosynthesis. The gray X represents genes that were deleted to reduce the consumption of pathway intermediates involved in other biosynthetic pathways. ERG20 was deleted and replaced by AgGPPS2 (A. grandis), which exclusively produces geranyl pyrophosphate, and mFPS144 (G. gallus), which favors the production of geranyl pyrophosphate over farnesyl pyrophosphate, an essential S. cerevisiae off-pathway compound. The arrows with question marks are catalyzed by IO, but may also require helper enzymes. National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers for all integrated genes are located in Table S1. Abbreviations: AgGPPS2, Abies grandis geranyl pyrophosphate synthase; CPR, cytochrome P450 reductase; CYB5, cytochrome b5; 7-DLGT, 7-deoxyloganetic acid glucosyl transferase; 7-DLH, 7-deoxyloganic acid hydroxylase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate; G8H, geraniol 8-hydroxylase; GES, geraniol synthase; GOR, 8-hydroxygeraniol oxidoreductase; IDI1, isopentenyl pyrophosphate:dimethylallyl pyrophosphate isomerase; IO, 7-deoxyloganetic acid synthase/iridoid oxidase; IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; ISY, iridoid synthase; LAMT, loganic acid O-methyltransferase; mFPS144, Gallus gallus mutant farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase N144W; SAM2, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase; SLS, secologanin synthase; STR, strictosidine synthase; TDC, tryptophan decarboxylase; tHMGR, truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase; ZWF1, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
In contrast to canonical monoterpenes that are synthesized in a single enzymatic step from GPP, MIA/strictosidine biosynthesis requires that GPP is shuttled into a nine-step pathway to produce the highly derivatized monoterpene secologanin (Fig. 2) (3, 24). Secologanin is then enzymatically condensed with tryptamine, derived from tryptophan by the action of a decarboxylase, to produce strictosidine, the central building block for all known MIAs. All required biosynthetic genes for strictosidine production (GES, G8H, GOR, ISY, IO, 7-DLGT, 7-DLH, LAMT, SLS, STR, TDC) have been elucidated in the MIA-producing plant Catharanthus roseus and thus were stably incorporated into this enhanced yeast strain (Fig. 2) (1, 3, 31). To allow for ample production of cofactors, which several of these enzymes require, we added an extra copy of SAM2 for production of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) (LAMT is a SAM-dependent methyltransferase) and ZWF1 to increase NADPH availability (ISY, IO, 7-DLH, G8H, and SLS require NADPH) (32, 33). The secologanin biosynthetic pathway includes four cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (G8H, IO, 7-DLH, SLS) whose catalysis relies on electrons shuttling to the CYP from cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) and in some instances also from cytochrome b5 (CYB5) (34). Both C. roseus CPR and CYB5 were integrated into the genome to enhance the reaction rates of the P450s (34, 35). The intracellular and extracellular metabolites of this strain (strain 0) were extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). However, we observed no production of strictosidine or downstream pathway intermediates loganic acid, loganin, and secologanin in this strain.
To determine why strictosidine was not observed, we analyzed the activity of the strictosidine biosynthesis enzymes by feeding strain 0 with upstream pathway intermediates (geraniol, 8-hydroxygeraniol, 8-oxogeranial, and nepetalactol; Fig. 2), then extracting extracellular metabolites, and monitoring strictosidine production by LC-MS (Fig. 3A). Feeding with 8-hydroxygeraniol (the product of the G8H enzyme), 8-oxogeranial (product of GOR), and nepetalactol (product of ISY) each result in production of a peak corresponding to strictosidine. In stark contrast, feeding with geraniol (the G8H enzyme substrate) resulted in no observable strictosidine product peak. These results suggest that low G8H activity or poor G8H expression is the bottleneck to strictosidine production in strain 0. Indeed, upon addition of a high-copy number plasmid encoding a codon-optimized G8H into strain 0, we observed de novo production of strictosidine (Fig. 3B). Notably, only one diastereomer of the secologanin-tryptamine condensation product, strictosidine, was observed, whereas a 1:1 mixture of strictosidine and its diastereomer, vincoside, is observed for the nonenzymatic reaction that occurs under acidic conditions (36). Based on these findings, to create strain 1, we integrated a copy of the codon-optimized G8H into strain 0, but this did not result in detectable strictosidine production, suggesting that two copies of G8H are not sufficient to overcome this bottleneck. However, when strain 1 is supplemented with codon-optimized G8H expressed on a high-copy plasmid, without exogenous geraniol, 0.011 mg/L strictosidine is produced in the extracellular fraction, suggesting that additional copies of G8H improve strictosidine production titers (Table 1 and Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
S. cerevisiae produces strictosidine de novo. (A) LC-MS chromatograms of extracellular metabolites (multiple reaction monitoring for strictosidine/vincoside only) of strain 0 grown with strictosidine pathway intermediates. The bottom trace shows the retention times of authentic standards of strictosidine and its diastereomer vincoside. (B) LC-MS chromatogram for strictosidine/vincoside produced extracellularly by strain 0 expressing codon-optimized G8H on a plasmid. The observed peak coelutes with a strictosidine authentic standard (bottom trace). (C) MS-MS chromatogram and exact mass data of the strictosidine peak produced in strain 1 containing a high-copy number plasmid expressing codon-optimized G8H.
Table 1.
Strictosidine production in engineered yeast strains
| Strain | Genes | Growth media | Extracellular strictosidine production, mg/L |
| 0 | Original building blocks (OBB) | YPD | N.D. |
| 1 | OBB | G8Hco | YPD | N.D. |
| 1 + G8Hco plasmid | OBB | G8Hco | pXPG8Hco | SD-ura | 0.011 ± 0.002 |
| 2 | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | YPD | Trace |
| 2 + G8Hco plasmid | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | pXPG8Hco | SD-ura | 0.06 ± 0.04 |
| 3 | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | CYPADH | YPD | 0.017 ± 0.007 |
| 4 | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | CYPADH | G8Hco | G8Hco | YPD | 0.031 ± 0.004 |
| 4 | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | CYPADH | G8Hco | G8Hco | SD | 0.031 ± 0.005 |
| 4 + G8Hco plasmid | OBB | G8Hco | ΔATF1ΔOYE2 | CYPADH | G8Hco | G8Hco | pXPG8Hco | SD-ura | 0.53 ± 0.12 |
Analysis of extracellular strictosidine production by various yeast strains described in the text (OBB; Fig. S1) after 6 d growth at 28 °C. Data are mean ± SD of six biological replicates. N.D. represents “not detected.”
To further alleviate the bottleneck at the G8H step, we attempted to minimize metabolism of geraniol, the G8H substrate, by the yeast host. Geraniol is metabolized by yeast primarily through esterification to form geranyl acetate and through reduction to form citronellol (37). Deletions of ATF1, encoding an alcohol acetyltransferase, and OYE2, encoding an NADPH oxidoreductase, are reported to attenuate these reactions (37). Thus, we deleted OYE2 and ATF1 in strain 1 to create strain 2. Trace amounts of strictosidine production in strain 2 can be observed, but is increased to 0.06 mg/L when supplemented with codon-optimized G8H expressed on a high-copy plasmid (Table 1). The 0.06 mg/L produced is a sixfold improvement over a strain without the OYE2-AFT1 deletion (strain 1 plus G8H plasmid), suggesting attenuating yeast geraniol metabolism can boost strictosidine production and highlighting anew the critical requirement of enhanced G8H expression.
Salim et al. (38) propose that the CYP IO converts nepetalactol to 7-deoxyloganetic acid via a three-step oxidation mechanism where nepetalactol is converted to an alcohol, then an aldehyde, and finally to a carboxylic acid (Fig. 4A). Similarly, the three-step oxidation of amorphadiene to artemisinic acid in Artemesia annua can be catalyzed by one CYP, but a recently discovered alcohol dehydrogenase and an aldehyde dehydrogenase have been found to improve the rate of this oxidation substantially (Fig. 4A) (35). Analogously, additional reductases may assist IO or other CYP-catalyzed reactions involved in strictosidine biosynthesis. Based on similar coexpression profiles with other MIA biosynthetic enzymes (24), we identified two putative alcohol dehydrogenases ADH1 and ADH2 and one aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH1. To test whether these candidate genes assist in any of the CYP-catalyzed reactions, the genes were cloned into a high-copy number replicative plasmid and overexpressed in S. cerevisiae strain 0. Using LC-MS, we analyzed strictosidine production in these strains 48 h after feeding the cultures with several biosynthetic intermediates. Expression of ADH2, now named CYPADH, resulted in a 2- to 15-fold increase in strictosidine production compared with an empty vector control depending upon the biosynthetic intermediate that was fed (Fig. 4B). These feeding studies do not definitively show which CYP(s) this CYPADH may assist, but the presence of this enzyme clearly improved the yield of strictosidine. For the other two candidates, ALDH1 and ADH1, no substantial improvement of strictosidine production was noted regardless of which biosynthetic intermediate was fed to the strain.
Fig. 4.
CYPADH increases strictosidine production. (A) The proposed three-step mechanism to convert nepetalactol to 7-deoxyloganetic acid (Top) compared with the similar three step mechanism to convert amorphadiene to artemisinic acid. (B) Amount of strictosidine produced in strain 0 containing plasmids encoding ALDH1, ADH1, or ADH2 relative to strain 0 harboring empty plasmid when incubated with the indicated pathway intermediates. Data are mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
To further increase de novo strictosidine production, we created strain 3 by integrating CYPADH into strain 2, which is capable of producing 0.017 mg/L strictosidine (Table 1). Additionally, we incorporated two additional copies of codon-optimized G8H into strain 3 to produce strain 4 (Fig. S1). After 6 d at 28 °C, strain 4 produced 0.03 mg/L strictosidine in both rich media and minimal media (Table 1). In an attempt to further increase titers, we incorporated into strain 4 high-copy number plasmids containing one of the upstream pathway genes (Fig. S2). Only introduction of codon-optimized G8H dramatically increased strictosidine production [0.5 mg/L compared with 0.03 mg/L for strain 4 without plasmid (Table 1 and Fig. S3)]. Despite the four integrated copies of the G8H gene (three codon optimized, one wild type) in strain 4, hydroxylation of geraniol by G8H still limits strictosidine production.
Using LC-MS, we subsequently monitored accumulation of all biosynthetic intermediates downstream of 7-deoxyloganetic acid in strain 4 containing G8H plasmid to identify additional potential downstream pathway bottlenecks. Loganin was the only detected accumulated intermediate (Fig. S4). After 6 d at 28 °C, this optimized yeast strain produces 0.8 mg/L loganin in the media, levels that surpass those of strictosidine (0.5 mg/L). These data suggest that, in addition to G8H, SLS may also be a rate-limiting step. However, introducing SLS on a high-copy number plasmid into strain 4, as well as testing independently four identified isoforms of SLS, did not substantially increase strictosidine levels (Fig. S2). Thus, further optimization may be achieved by overexpressing combinations of genes or by identifying additional partner enzymes. We note many of the iridoid biosynthetic intermediates are difficult to detect by mass spectrometry, and additionally, certain intermediates may be further derivatized by yeast, thereby making them difficult to observe. Therefore, we do not rule out the existence of other bottlenecks that can be optimized to improve titers.
Discussion
The pathways that encode the biosynthesis of terpenes and terpene-derived compounds produce an enormous range of chemical structures via a broad range of mechanisms (39). Harnessing the production of all classes of terpenes remains an important and challenging goal. Although S. cerevisiae does not naturally produce monoterpenes, it has been used to produce geraniol and other monoterpenes at titers ranging up to 36 mg/L (27, 28, 40, 41). However, in contrast to secologanin biosynthesis, these pathways are short and do not contain CYP-catalyzed steps. Moreover, secologanin, an iridoid type monoterpene, uses a unique mode of cyclization not observed in canonical terpene biosynthesis (42). Notably, sesquiterpenes, which S. cerevisiae does produce naturally, are produced at much higher levels in a yeast host. For example, a yeast strain that was optimized for monoterpene production still produced 200-fold higher titers of sesquiterpenes (40). Triterpenes, which yeast also produce naturally, have been reconstituted in yeast at yields of 20–40 mg/L (12). Reconstitution of alkaloids, which yeast does not naturally produce, has thus far been limited to the later steps of the benzylisoquinoline pathway (19, 25).
Here, we report a S. cerevisiae strain capable of producing strictosidine, the central intermediate for thousands of monoterpene indole alkaloids. This is the first report (to our knowledge) of de novo production of a plant-derived alkaloid in yeast. Many of these alkaloids are expressed in small amounts in the host plant, which makes isolation from natural sources challenging. The best of our engineered strains (strain 4 containing G8H plasmid) harbored three gene deletions (ΔERG20, ΔATF1, ΔOYE2), 15 plant-derived genes (AgGPPS2, GES, G8H, GOR, ISY, IO, 7-DLGT, 7-DLH, LAMT, SLS, TDC, STR, CYB5, CPR, CYPADH), one animal-derived gene (avian mutant FPPS: mFPSN144W), and five additional copies of yeast genes (tHMGR, MAF1, IDI1, SAM2, ZWF1) to allow de novo production of strictosidine in the extracellular fraction at yields of ∼0.5 mg/L.
Although the titers of strictosidine are low, development of this strain is a crucial first step toward the heterologous production of MIAs such as vincristine, quinine, and strychnine, all of which are derived from the strictosidine backbone (Fig. 1). Furthermore, this strain can be used as a starting point for incorporation of new enzymes to produce nonnatural products. This strain can also serve as a platform to identify undiscovered pathway enzymes, as demonstrated by the discovery of CYPADH, which assists secologanin biosynthesis. Finally, we can use this host to explore how the differential intracellular compartmentalization of MIA biosynthetic enzymes impacts production levels. For example, although STR is located in the vacuole and GES is located in the chloroplast of plant cells, in these experiments we used truncated versions of these genes that lacked the localization signal sequence to avoid potential enzyme mislocalization or bottlenecks related to transport across intracellular membranes. This yeast platform will allow us to further explore the impact that localization has on product yield, which may provide further opportunities for enhancing small-molecule production (25). In short, this strain provides an important resource for further study of plant monoterpene-derived alkaloids.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
The S. cerevisiae parental strain BY4741 was purchased from EUROSCARF. The pXP plasmid set (43) used to construct DNA fragments for homologous recombination is available from Addgene. PCR for construction of plasmids and linear fragments was performed using KOD Hot Start DNA Polymerase (Merck Millipore), and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies) was used to confirm chromosomal integration. All compounds were purchased from Sigma except nepetalactol (44), secologanin (45), strictosidine, and d4-strictosidine (46), which were prepared as described previously. S. cerevisiae codon-optimized G8H was synthesized by DNA 2.0. The mFPS N144W gene (strain ZXM144) was a gift from Joe Chappell (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY). AgGPPS2 was a gift from Reuben Peters (Iowa State University, Ames, IA).
Strains and Growth Conditions.
Yeast strains were cultured in YPD or synthetic complete drop-out (SC) media with 2% (wt/vol) glucose lacking specific amino acids (Formedium) at 30 °C unless otherwise indicated. Yeast-competent cells were prepared and transformed as described by Gietz and Schiestl (47). During transformation, the cells were incubated at 30 °C for 15 min (vortexing briefly every 5 min), and then 42 °C for 15 min before plating on selective media.
Construction of S. cerevisiae Strains.
All primers, plasmids, and yeast strains used are listed in Tables S2–S4. Detailed construction of various pXP plasmids (43) can be found in SI Materials and Methods. Constructed pXP plasmids containing genes to be integrated were used as template to amplify by PCR a linear fragment containing the desired gene (and marker when appropriate) flanked by 50 bp homologous to either the S. cerevisiae genomic DNA integration site or the adjoining linear DNA fragment. The fragments were cotransformed into yeast for selection on SC media lacking the appropriate amino acid. Several of the resulting transformed colonies were randomly picked to confirm correct strain construction by PCR analysis. The loxP flanked markers were recycled out using the pBR3060 plasmid, which was later cured from the strain using 5-fluorouracil (1 mg/mL).
Alcohol/Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Screening.
Strain 0 containing pXP plasmids harboring either CYPADH (ADH2), ADH1, ALDH1, or empty plasmid (to serve as wildtype control) were diluted to an initial OD600 of 0.1 into 2 mL of SD-ura media containing 3 µL of 10 mg/mL loganin or loganic acid or 22.5 µL of chemoenzymatic reactions that produced 7-deoxyloganetic acid or 7-deoxyloganic acid as described in SI Materials and Methods. Chemoenzymatic reactions with microsomes generated with empty plasmid served as nepetalactol controls. The cultures were left shaking at 30 °C for 2 d, and then extracted as described below using MeOH:acetone.
Extraction of Strictosidine Pathway Products.
The supernatant and pellet of the cultures were separated by centrifugation. The pellet (intracellular material) was resuspended in 50:50 MeOH:acetone and lysed with glass beads. After centrifugation, the soluble portion was removed, evaporated to dryness, and resuspended in MeOH. The original supernatant fraction (extracellular material) was added to 50:50 MeOH:acetone, vortexed, and left at –20 °C for 20 min. The sample was centrifuged, and the remaining soluble portion was evaporated to dryness and resuspended in MeOH. Both fractions were then analyzed by LC-MS. Further details can be found in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Joe Chappell and Xun Zhuang (University of Kentucky) for sharing with us their strategy to replace ERG20 with the mutant avian FPPS prior to publication; replacement of ERG20 with the avian mutant was entirely their idea. We thank Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J009091/1), European Research Council (311363), and the “Région Centre” [Architecture et Bioingénierie de la synthèse d'alcaloïdes à haute valeur ajoutée (ABISAL) project] for funding.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1423555112/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.De Luca V, Salim V, Levac D, Atsumi SM, Yu F. Discovery and functional analysis of monoterpenoid indole alkaloid pathways in plants. Methods Enzymol. 2012;515:207–229. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394290-6.00010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’Connor SE, Maresh JJ. Chemistry and biology of monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Nat Prod Rep. 2006;23(4):532–547. doi: 10.1039/b512615k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Luca V, Salim V, Thamm A, Masada SA, Yu F. Making iridoids/secoiridoids and monoterpenoid indole alkaloids: Progress on pathway elucidation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;19:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leggans EK, Duncan KK, Barker TJ, Schleicher KD, Boger DL. A remarkable series of vinblastine analogues displaying enhanced activity and an unprecedented tubulin binding steric tolerance: C20′ urea derivatives. J Med Chem. 2013;56(3):628–639. doi: 10.1021/jm3015684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Der Heijden R, Jacobs DI, Snoeijer W, Hallard D, Verpoorte R. The Catharanthus alkaloids: Pharmacognosy and biotechnology. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11(5):607–628. doi: 10.2174/0929867043455846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ishikawa H, Colby DA, Boger DL. Direct coupling of catharanthine and vindoline to provide vinblastine: Total synthesis of (+)- and ent-(−)-vinblastine. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(2):420–421. doi: 10.1021/ja078192m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuboyama T, Yokoshima S, Tokuyama H, Fukuyama T. Stereocontrolled total synthesis of (+)-vincristine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(33):11966–11970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401323101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.O’Connor SE. Strategies for engineering plant natural products: The iridoid-derived monoterpene indole alkaloids of Catharanthus roseus. Methods Enzymol. 2012;515:189–206. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394290-6.00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhou YJ, et al. Modular pathway engineering of diterpenoid synthases and the mevalonic acid pathway for miltiradiene production. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(6):3234–3241. doi: 10.1021/ja2114486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gueritte F, Bac NV, Langlois Y, Potier P. Biosynthesis of anti-tumor alkaloids from Catharanthus roseus—conversion of 20′-deoxyleurosidine into vinblastine. J Chem Soc Chem Comm. 1980;1980(10):452–453. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Minami H, et al. Microbial production of plant benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(21):7393–7398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802981105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moses T, et al. Combinatorial biosynthesis of sapogenins and saponins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a C-16α hydroxylase from Bupleurum falcatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(4):1634–1639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323369111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Santos CN, Koffas M, Stephanopoulos G. Optimization of a heterologous pathway for the production of flavonoids from glucose. Metab Eng. 2011;13(4):392–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakagawa A, et al. (R,S)-Tetrahydropapaveroline production by stepwise fermentation using engineered Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6695. doi: 10.1038/srep06695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hawkins KM, Smolke CD. Production of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4(9):564–573. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ro D-K, et al. Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature. 2006;440(7086):940–943. doi: 10.1038/nature04640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ajikumar PK, et al. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010;330(6000):70–74. doi: 10.1126/science.1191652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dai Z, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of ginsenosides. Metab Eng. 2013;20:146–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fossati E, et al. Reconstitution of a 10-gene pathway for synthesis of the plant alkaloid dihydrosanguinarine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3283. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fowler ZL, Shah K, Panepinto JC, Jacobs A, Koffas MA. Development of non-natural flavanones as antimicrobial agents. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pickens LB, Tang Y, Chooi Y-H. Metabolic engineering for the production of natural products. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:211–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Da Silva NA, Srikrishnan S. Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12(2):197–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pompon D, Louerat B, Bronine A, Urban P. Yeast expression of animal and plant P450s in optimized redox environments. Methods Enzymol. 1996;272:51–64. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)72008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Courdavault V, et al. A look inside an alkaloid multisite plant: The Catharanthus logistics. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;19:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thodey K, Galanie S, Smolke CD. A microbial biomanufacturing platform for natural and semisynthetic opioids. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(10):837–844. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ignea C, et al. Improving yeast strains using recyclable integration cassettes, for the production of plant terpenoids. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu J, Zhang W, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Overproduction of geraniol by enhanced precursor supply in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol. 2013;168(4):446–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fischer MJ, Meyer S, Claudel P, Bergdoll M, Karst F. Metabolic engineering of monoterpene synthesis in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(8):1883–1892. doi: 10.1002/bit.23129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burke C, Croteau R. Geranyl diphosphate synthase from Abies grandis: cDNA isolation, functional expression, and characterization. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;405(1):130–136. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(02)00335-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stanley Fernandez SM, Kellogg BA, Poulter CD. Farnesyl diphosphate synthase. Altering the catalytic site to select for geranyl diphosphate activity. Biochemistry. 2000;39(50):15316–15321. doi: 10.1021/bi0014305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miettinen K, et al. The seco-iridoid pathway from Catharanthus roseus. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3606. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kwon DH, et al. Elevation of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity increases xylitol production in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2006;43(1-4):86–89. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chu J, Qian J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S, Li Y. Progress in the research of S-adenosyl-l-methionine production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(1):41–49. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4536-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schenkman JB, Jansson I. The many roles of cytochrome b5. Pharmacol Ther. 2003;97(2):139–152. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(02)00327-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Paddon CJ, et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature. 2013;496(7446):528–532. doi: 10.1038/nature12051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patthy-Lukats A, Kocsis A, Szabo LF, Podanyi B. Configurative correlation and conformational analysis of strictosidine and vincoside derivatives. J Nat Prod. 1999;62(11):1492–1499. doi: 10.1021/np990150r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Steyer D, et al. Genetic analysis of geraniol metabolism during fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2013;33(2):228–234. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Salim V, Wiens B, Masada-Atsumi S, Yu F, De Luca V. 7-Deoxyloganetic acid synthase catalyzes a key 3 step oxidation to form 7-deoxyloganetic acid in Catharanthus roseus iridoid biosynthesis. Phytochemistry. 2014;101:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baunach M, Franke J, Hertweck C. Terpenoid biosynthesis off the beaten track: Unconventional cyclases and their impact on biomimetic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 doi: 10.1002/anie.201407883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ignea C, Pontini M, Maffei ME, Makris AM, Kampranis SC. Engineering monoterpene production in yeast using a synthetic dominant negative geranyl diphosphate synthase. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3(5):298–306. doi: 10.1021/sb400115e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Behrendorff JB, Vickers CE, Chrysanthopoulos P, Nielsen LK. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lindner S, Geu-Flores F, Bräse S, Sherden NH, O’Connor SE. Conversion of substrate analogs suggests a Michael cyclization in iridoid biosynthesis. Chem Biol. 2014;21(11):1452–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fang F, et al. A vector set for systematic metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2011;28(2):123–136. doi: 10.1002/yea.1824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Geu-Flores F, et al. An alternative route to cyclic terpenes by reductive cyclization in iridoid biosynthesis. Nature. 2012;492(7427):138–142. doi: 10.1038/nature11692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Geerlings A, et al. Biotransformation of tryptamine and secologanin into plant terpenoid indole alkaloids by transgenic yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56(3-4):420–424. doi: 10.1007/s002530100663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bernhardt P, McCoy E, O’Connor SE. Rapid identification of enzyme variants for reengineered alkaloid biosynthesis in periwinkle. Chem Biol. 2007;14(8):888–897. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):1–4. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




