Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Chem. 2014 Dec 12;53(4):280–284. doi: 10.1002/mrc.4193

Electron Spin Relaxation Times and Rapid Scan EPR Imaging of pH-sensitive Amino Substituted Trityl Radicals

Hanan B Elajaili 1, Joshua R Biller 1, Mark Tseitlin 1, Ilirian Dhimitruka 2, Valery V Khramtsov 2, Sandra S Eaton 1, Gareth R Eaton 1
PMCID: PMC4374029  NIHMSID: NIHMS660398  PMID: 25504559

Abstract

Carboxy-substituted trityl (triarylmethyl) radicals are valuable in vivo probes because of their stability, narrow lines, and sensitivity of their spectroscopic properties to oxygen. Amino-substituted trityl radicals have the potential to monitor pH in vivo, and the suitability for this application depends on spectral properties. Electron spin relaxation times T1 and T2 were measured at X-band for the protonated and deprotonated forms of two amino-substituted triaryl methyl radicals. Comparison with relaxation times for carboxy-substituted triarylmethyl radicals show that T1 exhibits little dependence on protonation or the nature of the substituent, which makes it useful for measuring O2 concentration, independent of pH. Insensitivity of T1 to changes in substituents is consistent with the assignment of the dominant contribution to spin lattice relaxation as a local mode that involves primarily atoms in the carbon and sulfur core. Values of T2 vary substantially with pH and the nature of the aryl group substituent, reflecting a range of dynamic processes. The narrow spectral widths for the amino-substituted triaryl methyl radicals facilitate spectral-spatial rapid-scan EPR imaging, which was demonstrated with a phantom. The dependence of hyperfine splittings on pH, is revealed in spectral slices through the image.

Introduction

Localized measurement of pO2 and pH is crucial to understand normal and diseased states.[1] It would be particularly helpful to have probes that can monitor both properties. Water-soluble triarylmethyl (TAM) radicals have been shown to be useful probes for EPR oximetry.[2, 3] Synthetic methods have been developed for larger scale preparations of TAMs to facilitate in vivo applications.[4] The narrow EPR signals and long T1 and T2 values of carboxy-substituted TAM radicals make them sensitive probes of local oxygen concentration.[5-7] Carboxylic groups on TAMs make the EPR signal sensitive to pH.[1] However, the pKa of carboxylic groups is too low to be appropriate for monitoring pH in the physiological range. Replacement of one of the carboxylic groups by an amino group to form aTAM4 or its selectively deuterated analog aTAM5 (Figure 1) has been shown to result in probes with continuous wave (CW) spectra that are oxygen responsive and pH sensitive in the range of pH = 6 to 8.[8] The relatively long electron spin relaxation times for carboxy-substituted TAMs trityl-CH3 and Oxo63 (Figure 1) [9] are advantageous for pulsed oximetry.[10-13] To assess the potential utility of aTAMs for pulsed oximetry and pH measurement, the pH dependence of the relaxation times for aTAM4 and aTAM5 were studied at X-band (9.4 GHz). T1 was measured by saturation recovery and inversion recovery and T2 was measured by pulsed electron spin echo decay. To demonstrate the feasibility of using these probes for EPR imaging, rapid scan images at 250 MHz were obtained for a phantom consisting of tubes containing aTAM4 at pH 6.5 and 7.1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of trityl (TAM and aTAM) radicals.

Experimental

Samples

Preparation of aTAM4 and aTAM5 was performed at The Ohio State University using literature procedures.[8] Weighed samples of aTAM4 were dissolved in absolute ethanol and diluted with potassium phosphate (1.0 M) or tris (1.0 or 0.5 M) buffer in an 20:80 percent ratio (ethanol:buffer) to yield a final radical concentration of 0.1 mM. Samples of TAM5 were prepared analogously using 0.5 M tris buffer. For X-band experiments solutions in thin-wall 0.97 mm i.d. Teflon tubing were placed inside 4 mm o.d. quartz tubes. For the CW and pulsed EPR experiments oxygen was removed by passing N2 gas over the sample using a thin Teflon tube inserted parallel to the Teflon tube that contained the sample.

The phantom for imaging was constructed from two quartz tubes, separated by a 2 mm foam spacer. A 7 mm O.D. tube contained 0.5 mM aTAM4 at pH 7.1 and a 6.1 mm O.D. tube contained 0.5 mM aTAM4 at pH 6.5. The solvent was 20:80 ethanol: phosphate buffer (1.0 mM). Oxygen was removed by bubbling the solutions with N2 prior to flame sealing the tubes.

X-band Spectroscopy

CW spectra were obtained at 295 K on a Bruker EMX spectrometer with an SHQ resonator. Microwave power was selected to be in the regime where signal intensity increases linearly with the square root of power. CW spectra were simulated with locally written programs and with WINSIM.[8] The nitrogen and proton hyperfine splittings obtained by the simulations are in good agreement with the literature values.[8] Inclusion of 7% of trityl-CH3 (Figure 1) was required to match the relative intensities of the peaks in the spectra of aTAM4.

Measurements of electron spin relaxation times at room temperature were performed on a locally-designed and built pulsed spectrometer[14] equipped with a Bruker ER4118-X-MS5 split ring resonator and a 1 KW microwave amplifier. The resonator was over-coupled to Q ∼ 100. Multifit, a locally written program based on the algorithms of Provencher,[15] was used to determine T1 or T2 from the decay curves. T2 was determined by two-pulse spin echo. For a sample of aTAM4 in tris buffer, variation of the length of the 90° pulse from 40 ns to 160 ns caused no discernible change in T2. The values reported in Tables 1 to 3 were obtained with a 90° pulse length of 40 ns, which corresponds to a B1 of 2.2 G. Longer pulses are more selective but result in poorer signal-to-noise. Field-swept echo-detected spectra were recorded with 90° pulse lengths of 160 ns, which corresponds to a microwave B1 of 0.55 G, and a boxcar integration window of 0.5 μs, to be field selective. T1 was measured by inversion recovery. For aTAM4 in tris buffer the value of T1 decreased as the length of the 90° pulse was increased from 40 to 320 ns, which is attributed to spectral diffusion. Data reported in Tables 1 - 3 were obtained with a 90° pulse length of 40 ns. T1 also was measured by long-pulse saturation recovery on a locally-built spectrometer [16] equipped with a Varian E231 resonator. The pump power was 12 dB below 600 mW, which is a B1 of about 0.2 G and the observe power was 18 dB below 10 mW, which is a B1 of about 10 mG. Recovery curves obtained with a 50 μs saturating pulse could be fit well with a single exponential. Values of T1 obtained by saturation recovery were systematically longer by about 1 μs than values obtained by inversion recovery with a 90° pulse length of 40 ns. For these rapidly tumbling radicals it is unlikely that the difference between values measured by spin echo and saturation recovery is due to spectral diffusion. The difference is comparable to the estimated uncertainties in the values. The poorer signal-to-noise for the saturation recovery experiments may contribute to systematically longer values of T1.

Table 1. pH dependence of T1 and T2 for aTAM4 at X-band+.

Line (Fig. 2)* pH T1(μs) T2 (μs) in H2O T2 (μs) in D2O
b 6.5 18±0.3 2.9±0.1
b 7.6 18±0.6 3.7±0.1
b 8.5 18±0.5 3.6±0.2 3.5±0.1
c 6.5 15±0.6 3.2±0.3
c 7.6 17±0.2 1.3±0.1
c 8.5 17±0.8 0.76±0.1 2.7±0.1
+

Values in tris buffer obtained with 90° pulse lengths of 40 ns.

*

The positions in the spectrum where the relaxation times were measured are marked in Fig. 2. The signal designed as line ‘b’ is an overlap of contributions from aTAM4 and about 7% impurity of trityl-CH3.

Table 3. Comparison of T1 and T2 for Trityls at X-band.

Compound T1 (μs) T2 (μs)
Trityl-CH3 [26] 16 9.1
Oxo63 [26] 15 6.4
aTAM4 (line b) 18 2.9 to 3.7
aTAM4 (line c) 15 to 17 0.76 to 3.2
aTAM5 (line a) 20 1.5 to 3.6
aTAM5 (line b) 20 1.5 to 3.7
aTAM5 (line c) 20 1.5 to 3.6

Imaging parameters

The projections for the 2D spectra-spatial image were collected at 295 K on a spectrometer with an operating frequency of 251 MHz that includes a modified Bruker E540 console and gradient coils.[17-19] The sinusoidal scans were generated with a driver similar to the one described previously.[20] The cross loop resonator and scan coils are similar to the ones described in Ref. [21]. 18 projections were collected with 10.8 kHz sinusoidal scans and B1 of 36 mG. The maximum gradient was 10 G/cm. The sweep widths ranged from 12 G at zero-gradient to 32 G at the highest gradient, which was sufficient to encompass the full gradient-broadened spectra. Signals were digitized with a Bruker Specjet II using 64k points per gradient and a 10 ns sampling interval which therefore encompassed 7.07 sinusoidal scan cycles within the digitizer time window. Each projection was averaged 49152 times which required 43s. The corresponding absorption signals were obtained by background correction,[22] sinusoidal deconvolution,[23] and combination of up-field and down-field scans. The image was reconstructed by filtered backprojection. To permit image reconstruction by filtered backprojection (FBP) the high-gradient spectra were ‘padded’ with zeros at the low- and high-field ends to generate projections with the widths required for spectral-spatial imaging.[24]

Result and Discussion

CW spectra of aTAM4 at pH 6.5, 7.6, and 8.5 (Figure 2A-C) and of aTAM5 at pH 6.5, 8.2, and 9 (Figure 3) are pH dependent and in good agreement with spectra reported previously.[8] Field-swept spin echo detection of the same samples provides the absorption spectra (Figure 2D-F), which are in good agreement with the first integrals of the CW spectra. Protonation of the amino group of aTAM4 increases the coupling to the amino nitrogen from 0.69 G to 1.01 G and decreases the coupling to one of the protons on the CH2 group from 2.04 to 1.05 G (Figure 1). The sample of aTAM4 contained about 7% of the parent compound trityl-CH3 which puts a sharp single line in the center of the spectrum (Figure 2). This signal provided an internal comparison between the properties of aTAM4 and of trityl-CH3. Because of the changes in the hyperfine coupling constants the contributions from the protonated and deprotonated species are well resolved in the high-field and low-field regions of the spectrum (Figure 2). In aTAM5 the two protons of the methylene group that link the amino substituent to the aryl ring are deuterated, which reduces the corresponding hyperfine coupling constants to the methylene nuclei by about a factor of 6.[8] The spectral width is therefore reduced, but more lines are resolved in the spectrum so deuteration does not simplify the spectrum. As discussed previously,[8] the EPR spectra at intermediate pH are the sum of contributions from the spectra of protonated and deprotonated radicals. Simulations can be used to find the coefficients of the two contributions, which can then be used to calculate the pH of the solution.[8]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

On the left, X-band CW spectra of aTAM4 obtained with 10 kHz modulation frequency, 0.05 G modulation amplitude, 10 G sweep with 2048 points, 20.48 ms time constant and conversion time, 41 s sweep time, 0.318 mW incident power. (A) at pH 8.5, (B) at pH 7.5,and (C) at pH 6.5. On the right, field-swept echo detected spectra (D) at pH 8.5, (E) at pH 7.5,and (F) at pH 6.5. The positions in the spectrum where relaxation times were measured are marked as ‘a’ and ‘b’. The line marked with ‘b’ has a contribution from about 7% of trityl-CH3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

X-band CW spectra of aTAM5 obtained with 30 kHz modulation frequency, 0.1 G modulation amplitude, 5 G sweep with 1024 points 163.84 ms time constant and conversion time, sweep time 167.77 s, 0.318 mW power. (A) at pH 9.0, (B) at pH 8.2, and (C) at pH 6.4. The positions in the spectrum where relaxation times were measured are marked as ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’.

The values of T1 for aTAM4 exhibit little dependence on pH or position in the spectrum. Pulsed imaging of T1 for Oxo63 is a powerful method for in vivo oximetry.[25] The pH invariance of T1 for TAMs suggests that oxygen concentration can be measured independent of pH using T1. T2 for aTAM4 and aTAM5 are strongly dependent on pH, varying between 0.76 and 3.7 μs (Table 1-3). Values of T2 are consistently shorter for the deprotonated form than for the protonated form. When the radicals were dissolved in D2O instead of H2O, the values of T2 for the deprotonated form became similar to that for the protonated form. Since the magnetic moment of a deuteron is 1/6 that of a proton, the increase in T2 in D2O indicates that water dynamics that modulates electron coupling to the H(D) contribute to the decrease in T2 for the deprotonated form of the radical. In a prior study[8] the lineshapes of CW spectra of a deoxygenated solution of deprotonated aTAM4 found that the Lorentzian component had a peak-to-peak linewidth of 96 mG. If the Lorentzian component is assumed to correspond to the spin packet linewidth, the T2 would be 0.68 μs, which is shorter than the 0.76 μs found by spin echo at pH = 8.5.

Values of T1 for aTAM4 and aTAM5 (Table 3) are similar to values reported for trityl-CH3 and Oxo63.[26] This similarity is consistent with the assignment that the dominant contribution to T1 for TAM radicals in solution at ambient temperature is a local mode.[26] Replacement of a substituent on one of the aryl rings does little to change the local mode, which presumably is centered in the hydrocarbon and sulfur core of the radical. Values of T2 vary substantially as a function of pH and structure of the substituents, which presumably reflects a range of dynamic processes occurring in solution. The dependence of T2 on both pH and on oxygen concentration would make it more complicated to determine pH or oxygen concentration independently from T2. The substantial pH dependence of aTAM hyperfine splittings makes these spectral features the preferred metric for determining pH.

Rapid scan imaging of pH dependence

Because of the spectral dimension, an EPR spectral-spatial image constitutes a mathematical pseudo-object. [27] The equivalent of rotation in the spectral dimension is achieved by changing the gradient amplitude. The maximum angle for a particular set of experimental constraints can be calculated using Eq.(1): [28]

αmax=arctan(LGmax/ΔB) (1)

where L is the spatial length of the image, ΔB is the spectral length of the image, and Gmax is the maximum gradient. If ΔB is too large, Eq. (1) shows that either Gmax must be extremely large (which may result in poor signal-to-noise), or the length L of the reconstructed image must be artificially increased relative to the sample size; otherwise αmax becomes too small relative to 90°. Missing angle algorithms can compensate for small decreases in αmax. [29] For aTAM4 the spectral length is about 8 G, which is much smaller than the ∼ 40 G for nitroxide radicals. The narrower width is advantageous for spectral-spatial imaging. Even with this narrow width, if the maximum gradient is 10 G/cm and L = 2 cm, αmax would be 68° which would require many missing projections for the reconstruction. Instead, the αmax was set at 85° which corresponds to L = 9 cm. The full image was reconstructed, but only the region of interest is displayed.

For a spectral-spatial EPR image, rapid scan has been shown to provide substantially higher signal-to-noise than CW for the same amount of data acquisition time.[21] A 2D spectral-spatial image of a phantom consisting of two tubes of aTAM4 at pH = 6.5 and 7.1 was reconstructed from projections acquired by rapid scan (Figure 4). Rapid scan EPR produces the absorption spectrum, rather than the first-derivative that is produced by conventional CW EPR. The spectral slices through the image reveal the absorption spectrum at positions in the sample, which are similar to the absorption spectra obtained by field-swept echo detection. The spectral differences between the probe at the two different pHs are well defined. Rapid scan EPR of trityls holds substantial promise for imaging pH with aTAM radicals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

2D spectral-spatial image (A) of a phantom consisting of two tubes of 0.5 mM aTAM4. (B) Spectral slices through the image at the locations of the centers of the tubes with pH=6.5 (green) and pH=7.1 (blue).

Table 2. pH dependence of T1 and T2 values forTAM5 at X-band+.

Line (Fig. 3) * pH T1 (μs) in H2O T1 (μs) in D2O T2 (μs) in H2O T2 (μs) in D2O
a 6.5 20±0.1 3.6
a 8.2 20±0.7 20±0.3 1.5±0.1 3.2±0.1
a 9 1.5±0.1
b 6.5 20±0.7 3.7±0.1
b 8.2 21±0.4 21±0.1 1.5±0.1 3.1±0.2
b 9 21 ±0.1 1.5±0.1
c 6.5 20±0.4 3.6
c 8.2 20±1.0 20±0.3 1.5±0.1 3.1±0.1
c 9 1.5±0.1
+

Values in tris buffer obtained with 90° pulse lengths of 40 ns.

*

The positions in the spectrum where the relaxation times were measured are marked in Fig. 3.

Acknowledgments

Partial support of this work by NIH – United States grants NIBIB grant EB000557 (GRE and SSE), K25 EB016040 (MT), R01 EB014542 (VK) and P41 EB002034 to GRE, H. J. Halpern, PI, and by the University of Denver is gratefully acknowledged. HE was partially supported by a scholarship from the Libyan Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.

References

  • 1.Bobko AA, Dhimitruka I, Zweier JL, Khramtsov VV. Trityl radicals as persistent dual function pH and oxygen probes for in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging: concept and experiment. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7240–7241. doi: 10.1021/ja071515u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Halpern HJ, Yu C, Peric M, Barth E, Grdina DJ, Teicher BA. Oxymetry deep in tissues with low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S. 1994;91:13047–13051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.13047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reddy TJ, Iwama T, Halpern HJ, Viresh RH. General synthesis of persistent trityl radicals for EPR imaging of biological systems. J Org Chem. 2002;67:4635–4639. doi: 10.1021/jo011068f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhimitruka I, Velayutham M, Bobko AA, Khramtsov VV, Villamena FA, Hadad CM, Zweier JL. Large-scale synthesis of a persistent trityl radical for use in biomedical EPR applications and imaging. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:6801–6805. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Halpern HJ, Yu C, Peric M, Barth ED, Karczmar GS, River JN, Grdina DJ, Teicher BA. Measurement of differences in pO2 in response to perfluorocarbon/carbogen in FSa and NFSa murine fibrosarcomas with low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. Radiation Research. 1996;145:610–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elas M, Williams B, Parasca A, Mailer C, Pelizzari CA, Lewis MA, River JN, Karczmar GS, Barth ED, Halpern HJ. Quantitative tumor oxymetric images from 4D electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI): Methodology and comparison with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:682–691. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elas M, Ahn KH, Parasca A, Barth ED, Lee D, Haney C, Halpern HJ. Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen images correlate spatially and quantitatively with OxyLite oxygen measurements. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4209–4217. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dhimitruka I, Bobko AA, Hadad CM, Zweier JL, Khramtsov VV. Synthesis and characterization of amino derivatives of persistent trityl radicals as dual function pH and oxygen paramagnetic probes. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10780–10787. doi: 10.1021/ja803083z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yong L, Harbridge J, Quine RW, Rinard GA, Eaton SS, Eaton GR, Mailer C, Barth E, Halpern HJ. Electron Spin Relaxation of Triarylmethyl Radicals in Fluid Solution. J Magn Reson. 2001;152:156–161. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mailer C, Sundramoorthy SV, Pelizzari CA, Halpern HJ. Spin echo spectroscopic electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:904–912. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Epel B, Sundramoorthy SV, Seifi P, Bryant J, Redler G, Halpern HJ. Exploring the limits of electron spin echo in vivo oxygen imaging, in: Rocky Mountain Conference on Analytical Chemistry. Snowmass, Colorado. 2010 abstract 141. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Epel B, Sundramoorthy SV, Barth ED, Mailer C, Halpern HJ. Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications. Medical Physics. 2011;38:2045–2052. doi: 10.1118/1.3555297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Epel B, Bowman MK, Mailer C, Halpern HJ. Absolute oxygen R1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:70. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Quine RW, Eaton GR, Eaton SS. Pulsed EPR spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum. 1987;58:1709–1723. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Provencher SW. An eigenfunction expansion method for the analysis of exponential decay curves. J Chem Phys. 1976;64:2772–2777. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85660-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quine RW, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Saturation recovery electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum. 1992;63:4251–4262. doi: 10.1063/1.5043316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Quine RW, Rinard GA, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. A pulsed and continuous wave 250 MHz electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer. Magn Reson Engineer. 2002;15:59–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rinard GA, Quine RW, Eaton SS, Eaton GR, Barth ED, Pelizzari CA, Halpern HJ. Magnet and Gradient Coil System for Low-Field EPR Imaging. Magn Reson Engineer. 2002;15:51–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Quine RW, Rinard GA, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Quantitative Rapid Scan EPR Spectroscopy at 258 MHz. J Magn Reson. 2010;205:23–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quine RW, Mitchell DG, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. A Resonated Coil Driver for Rapid Scan EPR. Conc Magn Reson Magn Reson Engineer. 2012;41B:95–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Biller JR, Tseitlin M, Quine RW, Rinard GA, Weismiller HA, Elajaili H, Rosen GM, Kao JP, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Imaging of Nitroxides at 250 MHz using Rapid-Scan Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. J Magn Reson. 2014;242:162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tseitlin M, Mitchell DG, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Corrections for sinusoidal background and non-orthogonality of signal channels in sinusoidal rapid magnetic field scans. J Magn Reson. 2012;223:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tseitlin M, Rinard GA, Quine RW, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Deconvolution of Sinusoidal Rapid EPR Scans. J Magn Reson. 2011;208:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eaton GR, Eaton SS. EPR imaging: progress and prospects. Bull Magn Reson. 1988;10:22–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Epel B, Bowman MK, Mailer C, Halpern HJ. Absolute oxygen R1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70 doi: 10.1002/mrm.24926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Owenius R, Eaton GR, Eaton SS. Frequency (250 MHz to 9.2 GHz) and Viscosity Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation of Triarylmethyl Radicals at Room Temperature. J Magn Reson. 2005;172:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eaton GR, Eaton SS. Introduction to EPR imaging using magnetic-field gradients. Concepts Magn Reson. 1995;7:49–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maltempo MM. Differentiation of spectral and spatial components in EPR imaging using 2-D image reconstruction algorithms. J Magn Reson. 1986;69:156–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maltempo MM, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Algorithms for Spectral-Spatial Imaging with a “Missing Angle”. In: Eaton GR, Ohno K, Eaton SS, editors. EPR Imaging and in vivo Spectroscopy. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1991. pp. 145–152. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES