Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 18;6:6484. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7484

Triple-helical nanowires by tomographic rotatory growth for chiral photonics

Marco Esposito 1, Vittorianna Tasco 1,*, Francesco Todisco 1, Massimo Cuscunà 1, Alessio Benedetti 2, Daniele Sanvitto 1, Adriana Passaseo 1
PMCID: PMC4374152  EMSID: EMS62069  PMID: 25784379

Abstract

Three dimensional (3D) helical chiral metamaterials resulted effective in manipulating circularly polarized light in the visible-infrared for advanced nano-photonics. Their potentialities are severely limited by the lack of full rotational symmetry preventing broadband operation, high signal-to-noise ratio, and inducing high optical activity sensitivity to structure orientation. Complex intertwined 3D structures like Multiple-Helical Nanowires could overcome these limitations, allowing the achievement of several chiro-optical effects combining chirality and isotropy.

Here we report 3D triple-helical nanowires, engineered by the innovative Tomographic Rotatory Growth, based on Focused Ion Beam Induced Deposition. These three dimensional nanostructures show up to 37% of circular dichroism in a broad range (500-1000 nm), with a high signal-to-noise ratio (up to 24 dB). Optical activity up to 8° only due to the circular birefringence is also shown, tracing the way towards chiral photonic devices which can be integrated in optical nanocircuits to modulate the visible light polarization.


Advanced chiral photonic components able to manipulate the polarization state of light are widely required in several application fields1-5. Recently, chiral metamaterials have attracted great interest because of the possibility to achieve negative refraction by means of chirality6 or to artificially reproduce and enhance the weak chiro-optical effects present in natural chiral molecules (enantiomers). Indeed quasi-free electrons in collective plasmon oscillations have been shown to overcome some natural limitations in two-dimensional chiral metamaterial structures7-9. However, these structures need oblique incidence of light to discriminate polarizations with opposite handedness and also exhibit weak dichroic selection. To maximize the interaction with light, chiral metamaterials should extrude along the third dimension, i.e,. by a stacked arrangement of a unit cell (quasi-3D objects)10-15. In particular, fully 3D helix-based metamaterials can be considered as the best candidates for pronounced chiral response integrated in compact devices, as demonstrated by the fully 3D helical metamaterials acting as circular polarizers in the IR range2, and realized by Direct Laser Writing (DLW). Most recently, the development of bottom-up technologies, based on block copolymer self-assembly followed by electro-deposition, has allowed the realization of nanoplasmonic gyroid metamaterial16. In this particular structure the presence of a network of multiply interconnected helical wires with opposite handedness provides 3D chirality in the visible range17, which has been explained by a simplified 3D oriented helical metamaterial model18,19. These results suggest further exploitation of this chiral geometry towards the achievement of additional, integrated, chiro-optical properties such as broadband circular dichroism (CD) in the visible range, high signal-to-noise ratio (to preserve the polarization state of the transmitted light) and high optical activity. Nonetheless, geometrically intrinsic reasons hinder the simultaneous demonstration of all these effects by Single Helical Nanowires (SHN). Indeed, one of the main limiting factors for multi-functionality of SHNs consists of the loss of rotational symmetry determined by the end of the wire20, resulting in unwanted linear birefringence. This prevents obtaining broadband and high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for circular polarizers20, and induces high sensitivity of the optical rotation to the structure orientation, thus limiting the potential applications of the device.

Huge efforts in the fabrication of chiral metamaterial helices have been made to achieve several chiro-optical properties in only one structure. Tapered gold-helix metamaterials21 were designed by DLW to broaden the operation bandwidth in the THz region and reduce polarization intensity conversion20. Recently, using Focused Ion Beam Induced Deposition (FIBID) technology, it has been possible to reach a broadband CD in the near-infrared optical region reducing the helix dimension to submicron size22. Wide band circular dichroic properties in the visible range were also demonstrated by planar stacked structures15, while three-dimensional bichiral photonic crystals23, 24, thought to limit the dependence of chiral effects on structure orientation, lead to the reduction of the IR bandwidth.

Rotational symmetry, intrinsically lacking in helix geometry, can be effectively restored with a packed multi-helices arrangement in a single cell by the Multi Helical Nanowire (MHN) configuration (similar to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) strands), which have been recently theoretically proposed20,25-28. MHNs are predicted to operate as broadband circular polarizers in the visible range with high purity of circularly polarized transmitted light. However, the expected potentialities of MHN metamaterials have never been experimentally explored so far because of the absence of a suitable technology to face the challenges of realizing intertwined 3D complex structures with nanometer features as required for operation in the visible spectral region.

Here, we show the first realization of a Triple Helical Nanowire (THN) chiral metamaterial operating as highly pure broadband circular polarizers in the visible range, fabricated by a new nanotechnology method that combines the basic principles of tomography with FIBID technique and that we named Tomographic Rotatory Growth (TRG). The implemented technology allows the realization of complex and intertwined fully 3D structures such as THNs with nanoscale precision. According to the optical properties envisaged in previous theoretical works20,25, the realized THN samples enable optical multi-functionalities in the visible spectral range owing to the co-existence of intrinsic chirality and three fold rotational symmetry, namely giant broadband circular dichroism up to 37% and high S/N ratio (up to 24 dB) in the visible range (from 500 to 1000 nm), because of the low light circular polarization conversion. Simultaneously, the fabricated THNs induce an optical rotation of the linearly polarized incident light up to 8°, as an effect of the only circular birefringence while the linear one is strongly suppressed (since the polarization rotation is largely independent from the sample orientation angle), underlining the ability of a high nanoscale polarization control. The developed TRG represents a viable method for the realization of new versatile miniaturized devices for nanophotonics, quantum optics and biological applications.

Results

Design and experimental realization

FIBID technique was already demonstrated to be a powerful tool for manufacturing 3D chiral structures at the nanoscale22, however, the realization of intertwined helical structures by FIBID presents two additional technological challenges. One is the difficulty to extrude the nanowires in the third dimension because of the presence of blind spots (i.e., the space occupied by the elements already grown). The other one is the extremely close distance of nanowires, introducing strong 3D mutual proximity effects, that prevent dimensional uniformity. These limiting factors were overtaken by developing the TRG method, in which the structure growth is stratified in multiple sections and combined with a split circular beam scan. In this growth mode, the basic scanning design (empty circle) is split into 6 arches arranged every 60° (figure 1a). The first fraction of the THN growth starts with the deposition of 3 platinum arches arranged every 120° (indicated in figure 1a with cyan color and starting from the seeding sites 1, 3, 5). The FIBID beam and pattern parameters were optimized following the procedure reported in ref. 22, where is also described the dose compensation procedure used to strongly reduce the 3D proximity effects that, for the THN growth, was further implemented by using a continuous gradient function for dose correction. For the subsequent beam scan, the same pattern is repeated anticlockwise rotating by 60°, thus inducing the deposition of the arches arranged every 120° (indicated in figure 1a with magenta color and starting from points 2, 4, 6), completing one third of a single helix revolution. For a complete THN loop, this procedure is repeated three times, as shown in the Supplementary Movie 1. Structural continuity between consecutive arcs grown at different times during the circular beam motion is ensured by a careful calibration of pattern parameters that allows to match the seed cross-sectional area of the already grown arc.

Figure 1. Device fabrication.

Figure 1

(a) Fabrication scheme to realize THNs. The basic two-dimensional layout consisting of an empty circle is divided in 6 sections (seeding sites arranged every 60°). During the first step, the circular motion of the beam leads to the 3D growth of three arches arranged every 120° (indicated with numbers 1,3,5). Then, after changing the starting angle from 0 ° to 60° anticlockwise the beam was moved to grow 3 arcs placed again every 120°. The extremely high level of alignment is achieved by setting the pattern parameters for a perfect overlap of consecutive arches. These two steps are repeated three times to get a complete loop of each sub-helix. (b) SEM images of the array showing THNs with ED=375 nm, WD=110 nm, VP=705 nm. The THN array size is 10 μm x10 μm, with LP=700 nm. (c) High magnification image of a small array area evidencing the wire continuity and high dimensional uniformity of THNs in all three spatial directions obtained by the TRG method.

Basically, the described method allows reducing a 3D complex geometry into a multiple planar structure formed by the image of subsequent sections of the 3D object, similar to what happens in tomography used for medical diagnostics. This approach, by solving the issue of blind spots for the ion beam, is also promising towards the development of 3D printer at the nanoscale. The method validity is demonstrated by the THNs in figure 1b and 1c, where a perfect continuity of the wire helix is clearly shown.

In figure 1b, the THN array formed by triple helices with external diameter (ED)=375 nm, single wire diameter (WD)=110 nm, vertical pitch (VP)=705 nm and distance between the centers of two adjacent helical wires of 235 nm is shown. The overall size of the THN array is 10 μm ×10 μm, with lattice period (LP) of 700 nm. The magnified Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of figure 1c shows the wire homogeneity and structural compactness of the THN array. The functional combination of three dimensional uniformity (by 3D proximity compensation), precise overlap among individual arcs (by pattern control) and the innovative fabrication method (TRG) has allowed the realization of THNs with highly controlled isotropy.

The structure design resulted from Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations as a function of the two main geometrical parameters, VP and ED (figure 2), providing the best overlap between high extinction ratio (defined as TL / TR, amplitude contrast of the left circularly polarized (LCP) and right circularly polarized (RCP) transmissions respectively) and broad circular dichroic bandwidth (defined as the wavelength range where the extinction factor values exceeded 1), in the visible spectral range.

Figure 2. Dichroic selectivity of THNs.

Figure 2

Calculated dependence of THN circular dichroic properties on the two geometrical parameters (ED and VP):(a) bandwidth, (b) extinction ratio. A good combination of high extinction ratio and bandwidth is obtained for low values of VP (around 600 nm) and external diameter around 400 nm.

Experimental characterization of chiro-optical effects

The measured normal-incidence transmittance and conversion spectra (figure 3b) of the square THN array (shown in figure 1b) demonstrate a circular dichroism (CD) up to 37% (figure 3c, solid line) with a broadband covering the wavelength range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, in good agreement with the simulated circular dichroism (figure 3c, dashed line). Reflection measurements performed for both LCP and RCP incident light reported in Supplementary Figure 1 show very low values of reflection intensity allowing to assert that the losses in the transmission spectra are mainly related to the absorption mechanism that appears to be different for the two circular polarizations29. In figure 3d we report the spectrum of the S/N ratio, resulting ≥10 dB in the whole measured range, with maximum values of 24 dB reached between 500 and 600 nm and two times larger than previously reported in SHNs25, 30 .

Figure 3. Circular dichroism and S/N ratio.

Figure 3

(a) Schematic representation to indicate the handedness of incident and transmitted circular polarization in the experimental measurements.(b) Measured transmission spectra (T++, T+− and T−−, T−+) for RCP and LCP incident light, respectively.(c) Measured (solid line) and simulated (dashed line) circular dichroism (CD=(T++ − T−−)/(T+++ T−−)) with peak value of 37% and broadband in the visible range. The simulated curve, obtained by varying the Pt content with dielectric function described by the Drude model, is calculated by considering an effective Pt content of 40%, as expected for FIBID technique33. (d) Measured S/N ratio, defined as I++/I+− (I−−/I−+).

The wider band of THNs with respect to SHNs is not caused by nanostructure size dispersion as the THN presented consists of three identical and coaxial helices rotated by 120° with respect to each other. The mechanism inducing the dichroic band enlargement can be related mainly to mutual interaction between surface plasmon polariton (SPP) modes excited by incident light in individual helical nanowires. In fact, the plasmon modes of the single nanowires, when combined in a THN configuration, start to interact, with a strength depending on the inter-wire separation and the radial penetration depth (1/k ρ) of the electromagnetic field associated with the SPP mode into the dielectric medium (air). At the frequency corresponding to the maximum CD value (700 nm), 1/k ρ can be estimated31,32 to be ~470 nm for pure platinum nanowires. Even considering a Pt/C mixture with 40% Pt and 60% C for the helical nanowires, (which is the expected average Pt content of the investigated FIBID structures in agreement with reported value for FIBID technique in the literature33) this penetration length scales down to ~150 nm, i.e., larger than the mutual inter-wire distance. In fact, because of the close proximity arrangement of the helices, the air gap between the respective nanowires is only 100 nm. As a result, coupling and hybridization between the plasmon modes34 of the intertwined nanowires is expected to occur, thus leading to a broader region of circular dichroism selectivity in the transmission spectra with respect to the SHN band (Supplementary Figure 2). Yang et al. theoretically explained with a similar mechanism the high S/N ratio expected in MHNs, being a parameter related to the current path generated on the helix wire surface by the interaction with the circularly polarized light25. The 120° spatial arrangement of THN leads to a three-fold rotational symmetry allowing higher S/N ratio. On the contrary, the geometrical anisotropy of the SHNs is responsible for the partial transmission of the opposite light polarization, thus reducing the purity of the transmitted circularly polarized light.

An additional property related to the complex geometry of THN structures is the ability to rotate the linear polarization state of the incident light. We performed the analysis of the Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD) of the THN array through the experimental set-up schematically described in figure 4a. The longer axis of the transmitted polarization ellipse (induced by the sample dichroic properties) was used to measure the rotation of the polarization angle with respect to the linearly polarized incident light. The ORD was measured for different sample orientations, by rotating the sample (Φin) in steps of 30°, as shown in figure 4c-h.

Figure 4. Optical Rotatory Dispersion and Circular Birefringence.

Figure 4

(a) Optical setup scheme to measure ORD at different sample angles. Linearly polarized light transmitted by the sample is analyzed with an half-wave plate cascaded with a second polarizer. The half wave plate is rotated in steps of α=2° with respect to the transmission axis of the linear polarizer, by means of a mechanically rotating stage, to obtain polar diagrams for the transmitted light intensity at each wavelength, like the one reported in (b) at 980 nm for Φin=0°. (c-h) Measured ORD at different sample angles by linearly polarized incident light. For each sample angle, the ORD shows similar trends, as expected by isotropic structures. (i) FDTD simulation of the ORD as a function of the input angle. The higher rotation value with respect to measurements is mainly related to the theoretical hypothesis of infinite array.(l) Optical activity measured in the crossing point (980 nm) where the linear polarization state is preserved. We note a very weak modulation (related to the extremely residual anisotropy of the nanostructures) around the mean value of 7.5° representing the polarization rotation only due to the circular birefringence. (m-n)Transmission maps of THN 6x6 array, as obtained with the microscope in polarized light configuration with a 100x objective lens under normal incidence excitation. When the linear polarizer and the analyzer are aligned, a bright-field image is created away from the THN region, while it appears darker in correspondence of each THN due to the circular birefringence effect (m). The situation is inverted when the analyzer and the linear polarizer are crossed (n).

The experimental results show the same trends for all Φin angles with a polarization rotation of about 8° (figure 4c-h), corresponding to a specific rotatory power of 11430° mm−1 (calculated as the maximum rotation angle normalized to the structure thickness). The same behavior is shown by numerical simulations (figure 4i), which overestimate the rotation angle, because of the theoretical assumption of an infinite array size.

The strong ability to rotate the polarization axis of the light can be clearly evidenced by linearly polarizing the incident light while a polarizer is placed at the output of the sample. In figure 4m and 4n we show the polarized light transmission images of the array. In the case of aligned-polarized light (figure 4m), transmitted light completely passes through the analyzer only in the area surrounding the THN region while it is stopped at each single THN structure, resulting in a 6×6 array of dark (blue) dots corresponding to the THN positions. The inverse situation is obtained, in the case of cross–polarized light (figure 4n), with a 6×6 array of bright (red) dots on a dark background.

Finally, we have analyzed the polarization rotation angle (θ) dependence on the sample orientation (Φin) at 980 nm, corresponding to the wavelength value with null dichroism, where a pure linear polarization rotation is expected. Figure 4l shows an average value of 7.5° for θ, corresponding to the measured optical activity induced only by the circular birefringence of the sample and related to the difference in the effective refractive index for the two circularly polarized components. The slight modulations (Δθ <0.5°) around the average θ value provide a quantification of the residual anisotropy (revealing extremely weak linear birefringence) related to fabrication tolerances.

Discussion

We have presented a nanofabrication approach for manufacturing complex 3D nano-structures combining chiral and isotropic features. Such a TRG method applied to FIBID technique enables the precise and continuous intertwining of multiple metal nanowires in a triple helix configuration and can be further exploited for even more complex nanophotonic systems, paving the way towards the implementation of a 3D printer of nano-objects. To the best of our knowledge, this approach has allowed for the first time to experimentally demonstrate the unique combination of configurational properties exhibited by the THN metamaterial such as the coexistence of strong broadband circular dichroism with high conversion purity and optical activity, all in the visible range. The realized THNs can be employed in miniaturized optical components for chiral photonics, to fully control the light polarization state, towards the development of pure super-achromatic polarization devices in the visible frequencies with applications in optoelectronic devices, integrated quantum optics, analytical chemistry, light splitting systems, circular dichroism spectroscopy for biological detection, and displays.

Methods

Triple Helical Nanowires fabrication

AlGaN/GaN/sapphire substrate was employed in the Carl Zeiss Auriga40 Crossbeam™ FIB/SEM system, equipped with Gas Injection System. Trimethyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)-platinum (IV) precursor was locally injected on the sample. We optimized the injection distance between substrate and nozzle and the scanning direction to obtain, respectively, high growth control by a suitable gas density, and high dimensional uniformity between nanohelices. The chamber pressure ranged from 1×10−5 mbar to 8×10−6 mbar during the deposition time. To recovery the pressure drop induced by effusion and the local depletion of the molecular density, we set a refresh time among single THNs. The growth strategy consists of splitting the basic layout into 6 arches rotated by 60° with respect to each other. The growth starts with the first three arches arranged every 120° with respect to the 0° angle and, after rotating the starting point by 60°, we grow the second three arches still arranged every 120°. This procedure is repeated for three times to obtain a full helix revolution. The nanostructure array (10μm×10μm) is grown with ion beam current of 1pA, accelerating voltage of 30 keV and step size of 10 nm.

Experimental characterization

All imaging of the nanostructure and the video in the Supplementary Movie 1 was performed by FIB/SEM system in the coincidence point of the ion and electron beam.

To quantify the circular dichroism in the chiral THNs, the transmission spectra were recorded in a confocal configuration by using a 10× objective lens with numerical aperture (NA) = 0.4522 under normal incidence illumination of a tungsten lamp. Circular polarization excitation was achieved using a combination of a linear polarizer and an achromatic quarter-wave plate. Light was focused on the sample by means of a condenser lens with NA<0.3. The microscope output image is collected and reconstructed on the entrance slits of a 200 mm spectrometer coupled to a charge coupled device (CCD) camera for measurements in the visible range. The light transmission was calculated with respect to light transmitted by the un-patterned substrate. The S/N ratio is evaluated including in the set-up a second pair of linear polarizer and achromatic quarter-wave plate in the collection path to select both RCP and LCP transmission for each incident light polarization state.

The S/N ratio (dB) for each incident polarization is calculated as:

SNLCP=10log(Itr(LCP)LCPItr(LCP)RCP),SNRCP=10log(Itr(RCP)RCPItr(RCP)LCP) (1)

with Itr(XCP)YCP indicating the intensity of the transmitted YCP light when the incident beam is XCP (XCP and YCP indicate the left- (LCP) or right- (RCP) circular polarization of the incident and transmitted light, respectively, as shown in the equation 1).

Finally, the ORD is measured by the same experimental set-up with linearly polarized incident light while the transmitted light was analyzed using an achromatic half-wave plate cascaded with a linear polarizer. The sample angle Φin was rotated in steps of 30° while the half-wave plate performed a 180° rotation in steps of 2° using a motorized stage.

Numerical simulation

The numerical simulations were performed using commercial finite difference time domain based software (Lumerical FDTD Solutions). We defined the extinction factor as the ratio of the fundamental component of the transmission spectrum (corresponding to the far-field component) for left circular polarization and the corresponding spectrum for right circular polarization.

According to this spectral function, for each configuration we evaluated the bandwidth from inside the larger 300-1100nm range of wavelengths, and where the extinction factor values exceeded 1 around the main peak resonance, the latter representing the most relevant footprint of the circular dichroism.

For the calculation of the bandwidth and extinction factor, we set both the helix pitch and external diameter variable, leaving as fixed parameters the minimum THN-to-THN interstice in the squared array, the wire diameter and the number of turns, which were set to 300nm, 110nm and 1, respectively. The THN-to-THN interstice values were chosen in order to obtain an effective filtering action avoiding strong THN-to-THN plasmonic resonances.

The vertical pitch has been varied from 600nm to 1800nm with a step of 20nm, thus setting the internal pitch between contiguous branches of different sub-helices to one third of the total pitch. At the same time, the external diameter ranged from 300nm to 700nm with a step of 10nm.

A good combination of high extinction ratio and bandwidth is obtained for low values of VP (around 600 nm) and external diameter around 400 nm. The slightly larger actual value of VP used for the fabricated THN (705 nm) was chosen to avoid connections among sub-helices of THNs. The substrate has not been included in the simulations.

Supplementary Material

1
Movie S1
Download video file (6.4MB, avi)

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by the national project PON “Beyond Nano” “R&C” 2007-2013 PONa3_00362, and by the ERC POLAFLOW grant number 308136. Authors acknowledge M. De Giorgi and L. Dominici for their help in optical spectroscopy and data analysis.

Footnotes

Additional Information

Supplementary information is available in the online version of the paper.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Turner MD, et al. Miniature chiral beamsplitter based on gyroid photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:801–805. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gansel JK, et al. Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer. Science. 2009;325:1513–1515. doi: 10.1126/science.1177031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuzyk A, et al. DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response. Nature. 2012;483:311–314. doi: 10.1038/nature10889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu N, et al. A broadband, background-free quarter-wave plate based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2012;12:6328–6333. doi: 10.1021/nl303445u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hendry E, et al. Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of biomolecules using superchiral fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:783–787. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pendry JB. A Chiral Route to Negative Refraction. Science. 2004;306:1353–1355. doi: 10.1126/science.1104467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Decker M, Klein MW, Wegener M, Linden S. Circular dichroism of planar chiral magnetic metamaterials. Opt. Letters. 2007;32:856–858. doi: 10.1364/ol.32.000856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuwata-Gonokami M, et al. Giant Optical Activity in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Planar Nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:227401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.227401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plum E, et al. Metamaterials: Optical Activity without Chirality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:113902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.113902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Plum E, Fedotov VA, Schwanecke AS, Zheludev NI, Chen Y. Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;90:223113. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cui Y, Kang L, Lan S, Rodrigues S, Cai W. Giant Chiral Optical Response from a Twisted-Arc Metamaterial. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1021–1025. doi: 10.1021/nl404572u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Decker M, et al. Strong optical activity from twisted-cross photonic metamaterials. Opt. Lett. 2009;34:2501–2503. doi: 10.1364/ol.34.002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frank B, et al. Large-Area 3D Chiral Plasmonic Structures. ACS Nano. 2013;7:6321–6329. doi: 10.1021/nn402370x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodrigues SP, Lan S, Kang L, Cui Y, Cai W. Nonlinear Imaging and Spectroscopy of Chiral Metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:6157–6162. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao Y, Belkin MA, Alù A. Twisted Optical Metamaterials for Planarized Ultrathin Broadband Circular Polarizers. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:870. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salvatore S, et al. Tunable 3D Extended Self-Assembled Gold Metamaterials with Enhanced Light Transmission. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:2713–2716. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oh SS, Demetriadou A, Wuestner S, Hess O. On the Origin of Chirality in Nanoplasmonic Gyroid Metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:612–617. doi: 10.1002/adma.201202788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Demetriadou A, Oh SS, Wuestner S, Hess O. A tri-helical model for nanoplasmonic gyroid metamaterials. New J. Phys. 2012;14:083032. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Demetriadou A, Hess O. Analytic theory of optical nanoplasmonic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:161101(R). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kaschke J, Gansel JK, Martin Wegener M. On metamaterial circular polarizers based on metal N-helices. Opt. Express. 2012;20:26012–26020. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.026012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gansel JK, et al. Tapered gold-helix metamaterials as improved circular polarizers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;100:101109. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Esposito M, et al. Three Dimensional Chiral Metamaterial Nanospirals in the Visible Range by Vertically Compensated Focused Ion Beam Induced-Deposition. Adv. Opt. Mat. 2013;2:154–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thiel M, Rill MS, von Freymann G, Wegener M. Three-dimensional bichiral photonic crystals. Adv. Mater. 2009;21:4680–4682. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Radke A, Gissibl T, Klotzbücher T, Braun PV, Giessen H. Three-dimensional bichiral plasmonic crystals fabricated by direct laser writing and electroless silver plating. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:3018–3021. doi: 10.1002/adma.201100543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Z, Zhao M, Lu P. How to improve the signal-to-noise ratio for circular polarizers consisting of helical metamaterials? Opt. Express. 2011;19:4255–4260. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.004255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang Z, et al. Polarization properties in helical metamaterials. Front. Optoelectron. 2012;5:248–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang ZY, Zhao M, Lu PX, Lu YF. Ultrabroadband optical circular polarizers consisting of double-helical nanowire structures. Opt. Lett. 2010;35:2588–2590. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.002588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schäferling M, Yin X, Engheta N, Giessen H. Helical Plasmonic Nanostructures as Prototypical Chiral Near-Field Sources. ACS Photonics. 2014;1:530–537. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lu Z, et al. Reflection Properties of Metallic Helical Metamaterials. J. Lightwave Technol. 2012;30:3050–3054. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gansel JK, Wegener M, Burger S, Linden S. Gold helix photonic metamaterials: A numerical parameter study. Opt. Express. 2010;18:1059–1069. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.001059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maier SA. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Barnes WL. Surface plasmon–polariton length scales: a route to sub-wavelength optics. J. Opt. A. Pure Appl. Op. 2006;8:S87–S93. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Langford RM, Wang TX, Ozkaya D. Reducing the resistivity of electron and ion beam assisted deposited Pt. Microelectron. Eng. 2007;84:784–788. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prodan E, Radloff C, Halas NJ, Nordlander P. A Hybridization Model for the Plasmon Response of Complex Nanostructures. Science. 2003;302:419–422. doi: 10.1126/science.1089171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
Movie S1
Download video file (6.4MB, avi)

RESOURCES