Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2014 Feb 16;52(4):2312–2319. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1284-z

Comparative evaluation of antioxidant and insecticidal properties of essential oils from five Moroccan aromatic herbs

Ayoub Kasrati 1, Chaima Alaoui Jamali 1, Khalid Bekkouche 1, Hans Wohlmuth 2,3, David Leach 2, Abdelaziz Abbad 1,
PMCID: PMC4375224  PMID: 25829614

Abstract

This study describes the antioxidant and insecticidal activities of essential oils (EOs) of Mentha suaveolens subsp. timija, Thymus satureioides, Achillea ageratum, Cotula cinerea and Salvia officinalis widely used in Morocco as flavorings, food additives and preservatives. Sixty seven components were identified accounting for more than 95.0 % of the total oils. M. suaveolens subsp. timija oil had as main components menthone and pulegone. A. ageratum oil was particularly rich in artemisyl acetate and yomogi alcohol. The essential oil of T. satureioides was characterized by high contents of carvacrol and borneol. C. cinerea oil contained trans-thujone and cis-verbenyl acetate as major constituents, whereas S. officinalis oil was characterized by trans-thujone and camphor. Antioxidant activities were examined by means of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), reducing power, β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching and ABTS radical tests. In all assays, the highest antioxidant potency was observed in T. satureioides EO with IC50 values ranging from 0.15 ± 0.36 μg mL-1 to 0.23 ± 0.67 μg mL−1 across the four assays. The in vitro evaluation of the insecticidal activity showed that M. suaveolens subsp. timija EO present the highest insecticidal efficiency against adults of Tribolium castaneum with LD50 and LD90 values of 0.17 μL cm−2 and 0.26 μL cm−2, respectively and LT50, LT90 values ranged from 44.19 h to 2.98 h and 98.14 h to 6.02 h, respectively. Our data support the possible use of T. satureioides oil as potential antioxidant agent, while M. suaveolens subsp. timija oil can be developed as a new natural bio-insecticide.

Keywords: Mentha suaveolens subsp. timija, Thymus satureioides, Achillea ageratum, Cotula cinerea, Salvia officinalis, Essential oils

Introduction

In order to protect food products against deterioration caused by oxidation and attack of insect pests during production, storage and marketing, many synthetic chemicals have widespread applications. Recent reports reveal that these synthetic chemicals may be implicated in many human health problems and may also lead to unintended side effects such as environmental pollution and pest resistance (Kumar et al. 2011; Sivasothy et al. 2011). For these reasons, the use of plant-based natural compounds instead of synthetic additives might be desirable, and the isolation and development of new natural bioactive compounds are of considerable interest. Bioactive natural compounds are considered to be attractive due to their low cost, availability in large quantity from the raw material, biodegradability and safety for human health and environment (Kong et al. 2010). Amongst plant-based natural products, essential oils (EOs) have received significant attention from the scientific community because of their wide acceptance by consumers and their exploitation for potential multi-purpose functional use (Bakkali et al. 2008). Extracted from herbs and spices through distillation, EOs, also known as volatile oils, are considered a good source of natural bioactive compounds which, when used as food additives, increase the shelf-life of foods by minimizing rancidity and retarding the formation of toxic oxidation products (Kelen and Tepe 2008). In fact, EOs and their constituents can act as antioxidant due to their redox properties, which play an important role in adsorbing and neutralizing free radicals, or by decomposing peroxides, quenching singlet and triplet oxygen, or by chelating the metal ions (Sarikurkcu et al. 2010). Furthermore, EOs are also widely recognized for their acute toxicity, repellency, antifeedant effect and fumigant toxicity against many stored-product insects (Tozlu et al. 2011). In fact, EOs rich in monoterpenes were reported to be effective as insecticidal agents by inhibition of respiration, reduction in growth and fecundity and by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity in the nervous system of insect pests (Sertkaya et al. 2010).

Our previous reports on EOs obtained from plants of the Moroccan flora have showed promising and interesting results regarding some of their biological activities (El Bouzidi et al. 2011a,b; Kasrati et al. 2013). As a continuation of the previous work of our research group, the aim of the present study was to compare some Moroccan plants EOs namely, M. suaveolens subsp. timija Briq., T. satureioides Coss., A. ageratum L., C. cinerea Del. and S. officinalis L., with respect to their antioxidant activity as well as their toxicity against T. castaneum Herbst, one of the most widespread and destructive stored-product pests.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The aerial parts of A. ageratum L. (Asteraceae), S. officinalis L. (Lamiaceae), T. satureioides Coss. (Lamiaceae), Mentha suaveolens L. subsp. timija (Briq.) Harley (Lamiaceae) and Cotula cinerea Del. (Asteraceae) were harvested from different locations in south and south-west Morocco (Table 1). Selection of plants was made on the basis of ethnobotanical literature and traditional use in medicine and as food additives (Bellakhder 1997). As cited in the literature, A. ageratum, T. satureioides and C. cinerea were collected at full flowering phase, while M. suaveolens subsp. timija and S. officinalis were harvested at vegetative stage. The identification was done by one of the authors (A. Abbad) and voucher specimens were deposited at the Laboratory of Biotechnology, Protection and Valorization of Plant Resources, Faculty of Science, Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco.

Table 1.

Locality, harvesting time and essential oil yield for the five Moroccan aromatic plants studied

Species Species code Local
name
Harvesting place Harvesting time Voucher specimen Latitude/Longitude Oil Yield
(% (v/w))
M. suaveolens subsp. timija MS Timijja Ourika February 2010 MST05 31°23′N/7°42′W 0.88 ± 0.12
S .officinalis SO Salmiya Ourika April 2010 SO046 31°20′N/7°45′W 2.13 ± 0.08
A. ageratum AA Terrahla Demnate February 2010 ACHAG045 31°43′N/06°58′W 2.04 ± 0.14
T. satureioides TS Za-itra Ourika June 2011 TS077 31°14′ N/07° 41′W 2.17 ± 0.03
C. cinerea CC al-Gertoufa Zagora March 2009 COTCIN03 30°20′N/05°52′W 0.93 ± 0.01

Extraction of essential oils

Plant materials were dried in the shade at room temperature (≈ 25 °C) and subjected to hydro-distillation, using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 3 h until total recovery of oil. The EOs obtained were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored at 4 °C in the dark until gas chromatographic analysis and biological study.

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analyses

The analytical GC/MS system used was an Agilent GC-MSD system (Agilent Technologies 6890/5973) with helium (high purity) as the carrier gas at a constant linear velocity of 37 cm s−1. The transfer, source and quadrupole temperatures were 280 °C, 230 °C and 150 °C respectively, operating at 70 eV ionisation energy and scanning the m/z range 41–450. The column used was an Agilent DB5 ms capillary column (30.0 m x 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 μm film thickness; Model Number: 122–5532) programmed from 60 °C to 246 °C at 3 °C min−1. EO samples (60 μL) were diluted with acetone (2 mL). The injection volume was 1.0 μL, the split ratio was 1:50 and the injector temperature was 260 °C. Identification of the individual components was based on; (i) comparison with the mass spectra of authentic reference compounds where possible and by reference to WILEY275, NBS75K, and Adams terpene library (Adams 2007); (ii) comparison of their retention indices (RI) on a DB5 (apolar, 5 % phenyl polysilphenylene-siloxane), calculated relative to the retention times of a series of C-9 to C-24 n-alkanes, with linear interpolation, with those of authentic compounds or literature data. For semi-quantitative purposes, the normalized peak area of each compound was used without any correction factors to establish abundances.

Antioxidant activity

DPPH free radical-scavenging activity

The Stable 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) was used for determination of free radical-scavenging activity of the EOs (Sahin et al. 2004). Fifty microlitres of various concentrations of the samples in methanol (EOs and control substance) were added to 2 mL of a 60 μM methanol solution of DPPH. After 20 min at room temperature, the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. Absorption of a blank sample containing the same amount of methanol and DPPH solution acted as the negative control. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and quercetin were used as positive controls. The percentage inhibition of the DPPH radical by the samples was calculated according to the formula:

%Inhibition=AbAa/Ab×100

Where Ab is the absorbance of the blank sample and Aa is the absorbance of the test sample. The sample concentration providing 50 % inhibition (IC50) was calculated by plotting the inhibition percentages against the concentrations of the sample.

Reducing power determination

According to the method of Oyaizu (1986) the different oils and control substance were mixed with phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe (CN)6] (2.5 mL, 1 %). The mixture was then incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. A portion (2.5 mL) of trichloroacetic acid (10 %) was added to the mixture, which was then centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000 rpm. Finally, the upper layer of solution (2.5 mL) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 mL) and FeCl3 (0.5 mL, 0.1 %), and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm in a spectrophotometer. The sample concentration providing 0.5 of absorbance (IC50) was calculated by plotting absorbance at 700 nm against the corresponding sample concentration.

β-Carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assay

As described by Miraliakbari and Shahidi (2008) a mixture of β-carotene and linoleic acid was prepared by adding together 0.5 mg β-carotene in 1 mL chloroform (HPLC grade), 25 μL linoleic acid and 200 mg Tween 40. The chloroform was then completely evaporated under vacuum and 100 mL of oxygenated distilled water was subsequently added to the residue and mixed to form a clear yellowish emulsion. 350 μL of various concentrations of the sample (EOs, quercetin and BHT) were added to 2.5 mL of the above emulsion in test tubes and mixed. The test tubes were incubated in a water bath at 50 °C for 2 h together with a negative control (blank) containing methanol instead of sample. The absorbance values were measured at 470 nm. Antioxidant activities (percentage inhibition, I%) of the samples were calculated using the following equation:

I%=Aβcaroteneafter2hassay/Ainitialβcarotene×100

Where A β-carotene after 2 h assay is the absorbance values of β-carotene after 2 h assay remaining in the samples and A initial β-carotene is the absorbance value of β-carotene at the beginning of the experiment. The activity was calculated as 50 % inhibition concentration (IC50).

ABTS free radical scavenging assay

The ABTS method is based on the reduction of the green ABTS radical cation (7.00 mmol L−1) that was obtained by its oxidation with equal volume of potassium persulphate (2.45 mmol L−1), (Scalzo et al. 2005) for 12–16 h at room temperature in the dark. On the day of analysis the ABTS+ solution was diluted with methanol to an absorbance of 0.7 (±0.02) at 734 nm. To determine the scavenging activity, 1 ml of diluted ABTS+ solution was added to 100 μl of oil and MeOH extract (or water for the control), and the absorbance at 734 nm was measured 6 min after the initial mixing, using methanol as the blank. The percentage of inhibition was calculated by the equation:

%Inhibition=AbAa/Ab×100

Where Ab is the absorption of the blank sample and Aa is the absorption of the tested oils. The sample concentration providing 50 % inhibition (IC50) was calculated by plotting inhibition percentages against concentrations of the sample. The test was carried out in triplicate and IC50 values were reported as means ± SD.

Insecticidal activity

Insect cultures

Colonies of the red flour beetle, T. castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), were maintained in the laboratory without exposure to any insecticide. They were reared in glass containers (16 cm diameter × 22 cm height) covered by a fine mesh cloth for ventilation. Each container contained a mixture of wheat flour, wheat germ, and yeast extract (13:6:1 w/w/w). The cultures were maintained in a growth chamber at 26 ± 1 °C, with a relative humidity (RH) of 70–85 % and 16:8 h light: dark photoperiod. Only adults were used for the test.

Contact toxicity bioassay

The insecticidal activity of plants EOs against T. castaneum adults was determined by the contact toxicity using filter paper discs (Whatman No. 1, 9 cm diameter). Oils were dissolved in acetone at concentrations of 0.09, 0.16, 0.24 and 0.31 μL cm−2 for M. suaveolens subsp. timija and T. satureoiedes and 0.39, 0.78, 1.17 and 1.57 μL cm−2 for A. ageratum, S. officinalis and C. cinerea. Several preliminary tests were conducted to select the doses to be used for each EO. 1 mL of each solution was dispensed on the surface of the paper that was then placed in glass petri dishes. Controls were treated with acetone. After 10 min, once the solvent had been evaporated, 10 unsexed adults (7–14 days) were deposited into each dish and stored in darkness at 26 ± 1 °C and 70–85 % RH. Three replicates were used for each treatment, repeating each assay twice. Mortality was recorded after 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h. Insects were considered dead when no leg or antennal movements were recorded. Bioassays were designed to assess respectively median lethal concentration (LD50 and LD90 values) (doses that kill 50 % and 90 % of the exposed insects) and median lethal time (LT50 and LT90 values) (times required to kill 50 % and 90 % of exposed insects).

Data analysis

Probit analysis (Finney 1971) was conducted to estimate lethal doses (LD50 and LD90) and lethal times (LT50 and LT90) with their 95 % confidence interval by SPSS 12.0 Statistical Software; LD and LT values were considered significantly different when their respective 95 % confidence interval did not overlap.

Results and discussion

Essential oils compositions

The yield of EOs, based on the dry weight of the plants, was highest (2 %) for S. officinalis, T. satureioides and A. ageratum. M. suaveolens subsp. timija and C. cinerea oil yields were significantly lower at less than 1 % (Table 1).

Between 9 and 31 constituents were identified in the EOs studied, accounting for 95.0 to 99.9 % of the total oil composition (Table 2). The EOs were shown to be characterized by a high percentage of the monoterpenoid fraction with oxygenated monoterpenes as a dominant subclass in T. satureioides (61.1 %), M. suaveolens subsp. timija (86.6 %), C. cinerea (82.3 %), A. ageratum (95.7 %) and S. officinalis (50.6 %) EOs.

Table 2.

Chemical compounds of essential oils obtained from aerial parts of the species studied (%)

Compounda RIb MSc SO AA TS CC
Santolinatriene 903 d 7.2
Tricyclene 925 0.3
α-Thujene 928 1.1 0.5
α-Pinene 936 0.6 3.5 4.3 0.8
Fenchene 948 0.1
Camphene 951 0.3 2.0 7.0 1.6
β-Pinene 960 0.5 1.0 0.9 0.5
Sabinene 989 0.4 1.6
Myrcene 990 0.1 1.3 1.0
Yomogi alcohol 995 12.4
α-Terpinene 1,018 0.2 1.0 0.3
p-Cymene 1,025 0.4 7.1 0.9
Limonene 1,030 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.3
Santolina alcohol 1,036 6.1
Z-β-Ocimene 1,042 0.4
γ-Terpinene 1,059 0.4 6.0 0.7
1,8-Cineole 1,060 0.5 10.9 8.2
Sabinene hydrate 1,067 0.6
p-Mentha-3,8-diene 1,073 0.1
Artemesia alcohol 1,081 7.1
p-Mentha-2,4(8)-diene 1,087 0.1
Terpinolene 1,088 0.2
Linalool 1,098 0.2 0.1 5.7
Isoamyl 2-methylbutyrate 1,100 0.2
cis-Thujone 1,108 2.0 0.3
trans-Thujone 1,121 20.3 41.4
Thujanol 1,133 0.3
Camphor 1,143 15.5 0.3 5.5
Artemisyl acetate 1,167 70.1
Borneol 1,169 1.4 0.5 17 .5
cis-Isopulegone 1,177 0.5
Terpinen-4-ol 1,179 0.9 0.1
Menthone 1,187 39.4
α-Terpineol 1,192 0.2 4.9
Myrtenol 1,194 0.1
Isomenthone 1,197 7.8
cis-Dihydrocarvone 1,198 0.2
Hexyl 2-methylbutyrate 1,232 0.2
Pulegone 1,242 34.3
Carvacrol methyl ether 1,244 2.5
Piperitone 1,255 0.6
cis-Verbenyl acetate 1,268 24.7
Bornyl acetate 1,288 0.5 1.5
Thymol 1,290 5.0
Carvacrol 1,302 23.7
Piperitenone 1,342 1.8 d
Silphiperfol-6-ene 1,344 0.6
α-Copaene 1,381 0.4
β-Copaene 1,390 0.3
β-Elemene 1,417 0.2 0.2
β-Bourbonene 1,421 0.2
(E)-Caryophyllene 1,426 3.0 11.8 5.6
cis-Jasmone 1,432 0.1
Aromadendrene 1,439 0.5
cis-β-Guaiene 1,445 0.2
trans-β-Farnesene 1,453 0.3
α-Humulene 1,460 0.3 7.6 0.2
Germacrene D 1,487 4.1 0.1 0.5
Verbenyl propionate 1,488 0.2
Viridiflorene 1,493 0.3
Alloaromadendrene 1,506 0.1
γ-Cadinene 1,519 0.1 0.1 0.3
Presilphiperfolan-8-ol 1,522 0.2
δ-Cadinene 1,524 0.3
Spathulenol 1,534 0.1 0.1
Bicyclogermacrene 1,541 0.7
γ-Amorphene 1,565 0.1
β-Dihydoagarofuran 1,586 0.1
Caryophyllene oxide 1,589 1.0 0.3
Viridiflorol 1,590 7.5
α-Cadinol 1,645 0.3
Valerianol 1,705 0.1
Manool 2,056 5.3
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 2.9 9.7 0.0 29.7 14.5
Oxygenated monoterpenes 86.6 50.6 95.7 61.1 82.3
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 9.2 20.8 1.0 7.0 0.3
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 0.3 8.6 0.2 0.6 0.0
Oxygenated diterpenes 5.3
Total (%) 99.0 95.0 96.9 98.4 97.1

a Compounds listed in order of elution

b RI (retention indices) measured relative to n-alkanes (C-9 to C-24) on a non polar DB-5 column

tr trace (< 0.1 %)

c Details concerning the codes of the species are given in Table 1; d not detected.

A report on M. suaveolens subsp. timija EO was recently published by our research group (Kasrati et al. 2013). Menthone (39.4 %), pulegone (34.3 %) and isomenthone (7.8 %) were the most abundant individual compounds. The high content of these oxygenated monoterpenes found in the timija subspecies was also reported in some other mint species (Mkaddem et al. 2007; Santoro et al. 2011).

The EO compositions of A. ageratum and C. cinerea have previously been reported by our research group (El Bouzidi et al. 2011a,b). As shown in Table 2, the predominant constituents in A. ageratum EO were artemisyl acetate (70.1 %), yomogi alcohol (12.4 %), artemesia alcohol (7.1 %) and santolina alcohol (6.1 %). The EO isolated from the aerial part of C. cinerea consisted of mainly trans-thujone (41.4 %), cis-verbenyl acetate (24.7 %) and 1,8-cineole (8.2 %). This composition is qualitatively similar to that of C. cinerea plants of Egyptian origin, but with important quantitative differences (Fournier et al. 1989).

Turning on attention to S. officinalis oil, the most abundant compounds were found to be trans-thujone (20.3 %), camphor (15.5 %), 1,8-cineole (10.9 %) and (E)-caryophyllene (11.8 %). These compounds are frequently found in other S. officinalis EOs, but with different percentage composition depending on geographic origin, environmental factors, extraction methods, phenological stage, sampling techniques and genetic differences (Raal et al. 2007). The EO isolated from the aerial parts of T. satureioides was characterized by carvacrol (23.7 %), borneol (17.5 %), camphene (7.0 %), γ-terpinene (6.0 %) and p-cymene (7.1 %) as major components (Table 2). This result concurs with what has been previously reported by Alaoui Jamali et al. (2012) and El Bouzidi et al. (2013).

Antioxidant activity

As shown in Table 3, the best contribution in DPPH, reducing power and ABTS assays was achieved by T. satureioides with IC50 values of 0.21 ± 1.17 mg mL−1, 0.23 ± 0.67 mg mL−1 and 0.15 ± 0.36 mg mL−1, respectively. The lowest activities were observed for oil extracted from A. ageratum with IC50 values of 7.49 ± 0.41 mg mL−1, 40.00 ± 0.54 mg mL−1 and 1.19 ± 1.24 mg mL−1, respectively. Similarly, T. satureioides oil exhibited the best performance in β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assay (IC50 = 0.21 ± 1.74 mg mL−1), while M. suaveolens subsp. timija oil had the weakest potency (IC50 = 1.40 ± 0.05 mg mL−1). For the four test systems applied, EOs from C. cinerea and S. officinalis showed in general moderate to weak activity. Although, for all assays, EO samples expressed less potency than the reference antioxidants butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and quercetin (IC50 values ranged from 2.80 ± 0.01 μg mL−1 to 7.09 ± 0.10 μg mL−1 and from 0.95 ± 0.02 μg mL−1 to 2.70 ± 0.21 μg mL−1, respectively).

Table 3.

Antioxidant activity of essential oils in three different assays

Essential oils (IC50 mg ml−1) Standard antioxidants (IC50 μg mL–1)
MSa SO AA TS CC Quercetin BHT
DPPH 1.28 ± 0.01 2.58 ± 0.14 7.49 ± 0.41 0.21 ± 1.17 1.05 ± 0.15 1.07 ± 0.01 4.21 ± 0.08
Reducing power 1.27 ± 0.03 4.65 ± 0.18 40.00 ± 0.54 0.23 ± 0.67 2.68 ± 0.09 2.29 ± 0.12 7.09 ± 0.10
β-Carotene bleaching 1.40 ± 0.05 0.47 ± 0.12 0.46 ± 0.14 0.21 ± 1.74 0.63 ± 0.16 0.95 ± 0.02 4.30 ± 0.33
ABTS 1.06 ± 2.23 0.72 ± 1.39 1.19 ± 1.24 0.15 ± 0.36 0.91 ± 0.52 2.70 ± 0.21 2.80 ± 0.01

Values represent means ± standard deviations for triplicate experiments

aCodes for the species are given in Table 1

The data presented in this study showed that the EO samples investigated produced different antioxidant effectiveness in the test systems employed. It seems to be a general agreement that the oxygenated monoterpenes, especially two well-known phenolic compounds thymol and carvacrol, are mainly responsible for the strong antioxidant potential of plant oils that contain them (Tepe et al. 2005). From this point of view, the higher content of carvacrol may explain the superior antioxidant potency of T. satureioides oil observed in all test systems. The antioxidant potency observed in T. satureioides EO is comparable to what has been reported for other members of Thymus genus (Tepe et al. 2005; Alaoui Jamali et al. 2012; El Bouzidi et al. 2013) and highlights the considerable potential of the plant as an antioxidant food additive. The level of antioxidant activity determined by DPPH and reducing power assays, showed that M. suaveolens subsp. timija EO has a moderate antioxidant activity. This activity may be related to the high content of menthone and pulegone, as reported in many others mint species (Mimica-Dukic et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. 2012). Concerning S. officinalis and C. cinerea EOs, the antioxidant activity observed could be explained partially by the presence of trans-thujone, camphor, 1,8-cineole, and α-pinene (Bozin et al. 2007; Bouaziz et al. 2009). However, the antioxidant performance of our S. officinalis chemotype was clearly inferior to what has been reported by Bouaziz et al. (2009) for samples obtained from Tunisian S. officinalis chemotype with high content of 1,8-cineole and trans-thujone. A. ageratum EO exhibited the weakest antioxidant activity, particularly in DPPH free radical scavenging and reducing power test systems, whereas it prevented the bleaching of β-carotene (IC50 = 461.00 ± 0.14 μg mL−1). As far as our literature survey could ascertain, this is the first study to provide data regarding the antioxidant power of C. cinerea, A. ageratum and M. suaveolens subsp. timija EOs.

Insecticidal activity

The toxicity of essential oils against the important stored-product pest insect, T. castaneum was evaluated in the contact toxicity assay using adult insects. The lethal dose (LD50 and LD90) and lethal time (LT50 and LT90) values are given in Tables 4 and 5. The lower LD and LT values reflected better effectiveness of essential oils.

Table 4.

LD50 and LD90 values of essential oils from species studied against T. castaneum

Essential oils LD50 b (95 % CL)c LD90 (95 % CL) Slope ± SE Chi square (χ 2) df
MSa 0.17 (0.13–0.21) 0.26 (0.21–0.41) 3.30 ± 0.34 0.63 2
SO 1.50 (1.17–4.80) 2.80 (1.83–8.99) 4.71 ± 1.60 0.05 2
AA d
TS 0.31 (0.23–1.17) 0.77 (0.42–2.57) 2.34 ± 0.40 0.65 2
CC

LD lethal dose.

aDetails concerning the codes of the species are given in Table 1

bConcentration: μl cm−2

cConfidence interval

dNot active

Table 5.

LT50 and LT90 values of essential oils from aerial part of M. suaveolens subsp. timija, T. satureioides and S. officinalis applied against T. castaneum

Oil concentration (μl cm−2) LT50 (h) (95 % CL)b LT90 (95 % CL) Slope ± SE Chi square (χ 2) df
MSa
0.09
0.16 44.19 (26.76–63.86) 98.14 (59.17–114.53) 2.18 ± 0.10 3.64 3
0.24 5.08 (2.52–8.74) 25.50 (13.30–46.91) 3.70 ± 0.49 1.79 3
0.31 2.98 (1.82–4.03) 6.02 (4.36–18.46) 3.04 ± 1.38 0.10 3
TS
0.09
0.16 71.05 (57.00–88.69) 283 (186.5–329.08) 2.06 ± 1.03 0.73 3
0.24 45.92 (27.47–80.27) 157 (98.13–190,68) 2.59 ± 0.92 1.26 3
0.31 30.50 (18.65–55.17) 79.38 (57.12–101.11) 2.97 ± 1.03 0.74 3
SO
0.39
0.78 56.32 (48.15–84.15) 106.01 (91.19–146.94) 2.76 ± 0.43 0.68 3
1.17 10.07 (7.31–20.77) 34.45 (20.25–41.31) 2.64 ± 0.36 0.79 3
1.57 8.43 (6.72–14.85) 14.71 (10.30–32.83) 2.92 ± 0.80 3.44 3

LT lethal time

aDetails concerning the codes of the species are given in Table 1

bConfidence interval

The results indicate that M. suaveolens subsp. timija, T. satureioides and S. officinalis EOs possess contact toxicity towards adults of T. castaneum. Neither A. ageratum nor C. cinerea EOs demonstrated toxicity in this assay.

As shown in Table 4, M. suaveolens subsp. timija EO had the best insecticidal activity against T. castaneum with LD50 and LD90 values of 0.17 μL cm−2 and 0.26 μL cm−2, respectively. The least efficiency was observed for S. officinalis oil with LD50 and LD90 equal to 1.50 and 2.80 μL cm−2, respectively. T. satureoides oil expressed intermediate toxicity with LD50 value of 0.31 μL cm−2 and LD90 of 0.77 μL cm−2. The LT50 and LT90 mortality decreased with increasing concentrations of the oils (Table 5). Interestingly, at the lowest tested concentrations of 0.16 μL cm−2, T. castaneum was more susceptible to M. suaveolens subsp. timija EO with LT50 and LT90 values of 44.19 and 98.14 h, respectively. The highest median lethal time values were observed when the insect was treated with S. officinalis EO with LT50 value of 56.32 h and LT90 value equal to 106.01 h at the lowest tested concentration of 0.78 μL cm−2.

The above results show that the EOs tested possessed variable toxicity against T. castaneum. This can be attributed to differences in oil composition.. The potent toxic effect of M. suaveolens subsp. timija oil may be due to the high content of menthone and pulegone, two oxygenated monoterpenes well known for their strong insecticidal activity (Pavlidou et al., 2004; Liu et al. 2011). This result is in agreement with previous reports on some Mentha species EOs against several storage pest insects (Lamiri et al. 2001; Mohamed and Abdelgaleil 2008). The toxicity observed in T. satureoides EO might be explained by the presence of carvacrol, p-cymene and borneol. In fact, it has been previously shown that EOs rich in carvacrol and p-cymene possess acute toxic effects against various storage insect pests (Kordali et al. 2008; Tozlu et al. 2011). Although numerous reports exist on insecticidal activity of S. officinalis EO (Ateyyat et al. 2012; Tayoub et al. 2012), no data have yet been published regarding its activity against T. castaneum. The insecticidal property of S. officinalis EO has been related to the high content of camphor as was reported in many other camphor rich species such as Salvia hydrangea and Achillea gypsicola (Kotan et al. 2008; Tozlu et al. 2011). There seems to be general consensus that the insecticidal activity of EOs cannot be related to only major compounds. In fact, as EOs are very complex mixtures, synergistic and antagonistic effects of both major and minor constituents may be important determinants of the activity of the oil (Kordali et al. 2008). Concerning A. ageratum and C. cinerea EOs, to our knowledge, there has been no previous report evaluating the insecticidal properties of these species.

Conclusions

The antioxidant and insecticidal activities of five plants EOs were evaluated and compared in this work. T. satureioides EO exhibited strong antioxidant effects, while M. suaveolens subsp. timija, T. satureioides and S. officinalis were found to possess a significant toxicity against adults of T. castaneum. These findings provide additional information on the biological properties and consequently the economic values of EOs of Moroccan aromatic plants. It also provides a platform for the development of new eco-friendly and safer botanical materials, which may be used as effective alternative antioxidant and/or insecticidal natural agents for the preservation of processed food products.

References

  1. Adams RP. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatogra-phy/Mass Spectrometry. Carol Stream, IL: Allured Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alaoui Jamali C, El Bouzidi L, Bekkouche K, Hassani L, Markouk M, Wohlmuth H, Leach D, Abbad A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and anticandidal activities of essential oils from different wild Moroccan Thymus species. Chem Biodivers. 2012;9:1188–1197. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201200041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ateyyat M, Abdel-Wali M, Al-Antary T. Toxicity of five medicinal plant oils to woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Homoptera: Aphididae) Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2012;6:66–72. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils - a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:446–475. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellakhder J. La pharmacopée marocaine traditionnelle; Médicine arabe ancienne et savoir populaire. Saint Etienne: Ibis Press; 1997. p. 764. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouaziz M, Yangui T, Sayadi S, Dhouib A. Disinfectant properties of essential oils from Salvia officinalis L. cultivated in Tunisia. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47:2755–2760. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bozin B, Mimica-Dukic N, Samojlik I, Jovin E. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of rosemary and sage (Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:7879–7885. doi: 10.1021/jf0715323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. El Bouzidi L, Abbad A, Lahcen H, Fattarsi K, Leach D, Markouk M, Legendre L, Bekkouche K. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of wild and cultivated Moroccan Achillea ageratum L.: a rare and threatened medicinal species. Chem Biodivers. 2011;9:598–605. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201100115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. El Bouzidi L, Abbad A, Lahcen H, Fattarsi K, Leach D, Markouk M, Legendre L, Bekkouche K. Chemical composition and anticandidal properties of the essential oil isolated from aerial parts of cotula cinerea: a rare and threatened medicinal plant in Morocco. Nat Prod Commun. 2011;6:1491–1494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. El Bouzidi L, Alaoui Jamali C, Bekkouche K, Hassani L, Wohlmuth H, Leach D, Abbad A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oils obtained from wild and cultivated Moroccan Thymus species. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;43:450–456. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. 3. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fournier G, Baghdadi H, Ahmed SS, Paris M. Contribution to the study of Cotula cinerea essential oil. Planta Med. 1989;55:580. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kasrati A, Alaoui Jamali C, Bekkouche K, Lahcen H, Markouk M, Wohlmuth H, Leach D, Abbad A. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of wild and cultivated mint timija (Mentha suaveolens subsp. timija (Briq.) Harley), an endemic and threatened medicinal species in Morocco. Nat Prod Res. 2013;27:1119–1122. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2012.708661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelen M, Tepe B. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the essential oils of three Salvia species from Turkish flora. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:4096–4104. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kong KW, Ismail A, Tan CP, Rajab NF. Optimization of oven drying conditions for lycopene content and lipophilic antioxidant capacity in a by-product of pink guava puree industry using response surface methodology. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2010;43:729–735. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kordali S, Cakir A, Ozer H, Cakmakci R, Kesdek M, Mete E. Antifungal, phytotoxic and insecticidal properties of essential oil isolated from Turkish Origanum acutidens and its three components, carvacrol, thymol and p-cymene. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8788–8795. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kotan R, Kordali S, Cadir A, Kesdek M, Kaya Y, Kilic H. Antimicrobial and insecticidal activities of essential oil isolated from Turkish Salvia hydrangea DC. ex Benth. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2008;36:360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2007.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S. Repellent, larvicidal and pupicidal properties of essential oils and their formulations against the housefly, Musca domestica. Med Vet Entomol. 2011;25:302–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lamiri A, Lhaloui S, Benjilali B, Berrada M. Insecticidal effects of essential oils against Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say) Field Crops Res. 2001;71:9–15. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00139-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu ZL, Chu SS, Jiang GH. Toxicity of Schizonpeta multifida essential oil and its constituent compounds towards two grain storage Insects. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91:905–909. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mimica-Dukic N, Bozin B, Sokovic M, Mihajlovic B, Matavulj M. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of three Mentha species essential oils. Planta Med. 2003;69:413–419. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miraliakbari H, Shahidi F. Antioxidant activity of minor components of tree nut oils. Food Chem. 2008;111:421–427. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mkaddem M, Bousaid M, Ben Fadhel N. Variability of volatiles in Tunisian Mentha pulegium L. (Lamiaceae) J Essent Oil Res. 2007;19:211–215. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2007.9699263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohamed MIE, Abdelgaleil AMS. Chemical composition and insecticidal potential of essential oils from Egyptian plants against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Appl Entomol Zool. 2008;43:599–607. doi: 10.1303/aez.2008.599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucoseamine. Jpn J Nutr. 1986;44:307–315. doi: 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pavlidou V, Karpouhtsis I, Franzios G, Zambetaki A, Scouras Z, Mavragani-Tsipidou P. Insecticidal and genotoxic effects of essential oils of Greek sage, Salvia fruticosa, and Mint, Mentha pulegium, on Drosophila melanogaster and Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) J Agric Urban Entomol. 2004;21:39–49. [Google Scholar]
  27. Raal A, Orav A, Arak E. Composition of the essential oil of Salvia officinalis L. from various European countries. Nat Prod Res. 2007;5:406–411. doi: 10.1080/14786410500528478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sahin F, Güllüce M, Daferera D, Sökmen A, Sökmen M, Polissiou M, Agar G, Özer H. Biological activities of the essential oils and methanol extract of Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Food Control. 2004;15:549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Santoro MV, Zygadlo J, Giordano W, Erika Banchio E. Volatile organic compounds from rhizobacteria increase biosynthesis of essential oils and growth parameters in peppermint (Mentha piperita) Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49:1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sarikurkcu C, Ozer MS, Eskici M, Tepe B, Can S, Mete E. Essential oil composition and antioxidant activity of Thymus longicaulis C. Presl subsp. longicaulis var. longicaulis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:1801–1805. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Scalzo J, Politi A, Pellegrini N, Mezzetti B, Battino M. Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition. 2005;21:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sertkaya E, Kaya K, Soylu S. Acaricidal activities of the essential oils from several medicinal plants against the carmine spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisd.) (Acarina: Tetranychidae) Ind Crops Prod. 2010;31:107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sivasothy Y, Chong WK, Hamid A, Eldeen IM, Sulaiman SF, Awang K. Essential oils of Zingiber officinale var. rubrum Theilade and their antibacterial activities. Food Chem. 2011;124:514–517. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tayoub G, Odeh A, Ghanem I. Chemical composition and fumigation toxicity of Laurus nobilis L. and Salvia officinalis L. essential oils on larvae of khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium Everts) Herba Pol. 2012;58:26–37. [Google Scholar]
  35. Teixeira B, Marquesa A, Ramosa C, Batista I, Serrano C, Matos O, Neng N, Nogueira JMF, Saraiva JA, Nunes ML. European pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium) from Portugal: chemical composition of essential oil and antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of extracts and essential oil. Ind Crops Prod. 2012;36:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tepe B, Sokmen M, Akpulat HA, Daferera D, Polissiou M, Sokmen A. Antioxidative activity of the essential oils of Thymus sipyleus subsp. sipyleus var. sipyleus and Thymus sipyleus subsp. sipyleus var. rosulans. J Food Engi. 2005;66:447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tozlu E, Çakır A, Kordali Ş, Tozlu G, Özer H, Akçin Aytaş T. Chemical compositions and insecticidal effects of essential oils isolated from Achillea gypsicola, Satureja hortensis, Origanum acutidens and Hypericum scabrum against broadbean weevil (Bruchus dentipes) Sci Hortic. 2011;130:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES