Skip to main content
BMJ Clinical Evidence logoLink to BMJ Clinical Evidence
. 2015 Mar 27;2015:1408.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): metformin

David J Cahill 1,#, Katherine O'Brien 2,#
PMCID: PMC4375713  PMID: 25814168

Abstract

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is classically characterised by an accumulation of incompletely developed follicles in the ovaries due to anovulation. However, since the publication of the Rotterdam criteria, there is acceptance that menstrual cycle and endocrine dysfunction with hyperandrogenism is more important in reaching the diagnosis than ultrasound findings. It is diagnosed in up to 10% of women attending gynaecology clinics, but the prevalence in the population as a whole varies from 10% to 20%, depending on which diagnostic criteria are used. PCOS has been associated with hirsutism, infertility, acne, weight gain, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and endometrial hyperplasia.

Methods and outcomes

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of metformin on hirsutism and menstrual frequency in women with PCOS? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results

We found 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: metformin compared with placebo/no treatment, metformin compared with weight loss intervention, or metformin compared with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol.

Key Points

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a syndrome of ovarian dysfunction together with established features of hyperandrogenism and morphological polycystic changes in the ovary. It is a condition for which there are disputed diagnostic criterion to confirm clinical diagnosis. However, since the publication of the Rotterdam criteria, there is acceptance that menstrual cycle and endocrine dysfunction with hyperandrogenism are more important in reaching the diagnosis than ultrasound findings.

  • Prevalence in the population as a whole varies from 10% to 20%, depending on which diagnostic criteria are used.

  • Clinical manifestations of PCOS include infrequent or absent menses and signs of androgen excess, including acne or seborrhoea.

  • PCOS has been associated with hirsutism, infertility, insulin resistance, elevated serum luteinising hormone levels, weight gain, type 2 diabetes, CVD, and endometrial hyperplasia.

In this review, we have reported on the effects of metformin on hirsutism and menstrual frequency in people with PCOS compared with placebo/no treatment, weight loss intervention, or cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol.

  • We have reported on clinical outcomes, such as hirsutism scores, rather than laboratory-based outcomes (such as effects on hormone levels).

In general, we found evidence mainly from small RCTs of limited methodological quality.

Many RCTs reported effects on infertility as their primary outcome, and any data on hirsutism and menstrual effects were more sparingly reported.

We found limited evidence that metformin may improve menstrual frequency compared with placebo.

  • Many of the trials also included a diet or a diet plus exercise intervention in both groups.

We found insufficient evidence on the effects of metformin on hirsutism compared with placebo.

Metformin may be associated with an increase of gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with placebo.

We don’t know whether metformin is more effective than a weight loss intervention (diet or diet plus exercise) at improving hirsutism or menstrual frequency.

  • We found insufficient evidence from two small RCTs to draw reliable conclusions.

We don’t know how metformin amd cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol compare at improving hirsutism and menstrual frequency, as we found little high-quality evidence.

  • Metformin may increase gastrointestinal effects (including nausea and diarrhoea) compared with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol, resulting in the need to stop medication.

  • However, cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol may increase other adverse effects (such as weight gain, high blood pressure, chest pain, and headache) compared with metformin, also resulting in the need to stop medication.

Clinical context

About this condition

Definition

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS; Stein-Leventhal syndrome; sclerocystic ovarian disease) is, by definition, a condition for which there are disputed diagnostic criteria to confirm clinical diagnosis. It is a syndrome of ovarian dysfunction together with established features of hyperandrogenism and morphological polycystic changes in the ovary. The nomenclature of the condition is somewhat misleading, as the ultrasound findings are not a key part of the diagnostic criteria. Clinical manifestations include infrequent or absent menses and signs of androgen excess, which include acne or seborrhoea. Women with PCOS commonly have insulin resistance and elevated serum luteinising hormone (LH) levels, and are at an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events. In this review, we have included studies in women aged 18 to 45 years, or where the majority of participants are aged 18 to 45 years.

Incidence/ Prevalence

PCOS is diagnosed in 4% to 10% of women attending gynaecology clinics in resource-rich countries, but this figure may not reflect the true prevalence as the criteria used for diagnosis vary. Depending on the diagnostic criteria used, prevalence in the population as a whole varies from 10% to 20%. An international consensus definition of PCOS defined a set of agreed criteria used for diagnosis. Studies since then suggest a greater than 20% incidence and prevalence of PCOS in overweight and obese women.

Aetiology/ Risk factors

The aetiology is unknown. Genetic factors play a part, but the exact mechanisms are unclear. Two studies found some evidence of familial aggregation of hyperandrogenaemia (with or without oligomenorrhoea) in first-degree relatives of women with PCOS. In the first study, 22% of sisters of women with PCOS fulfilled diagnostic criteria for PCOS. In the second study, of the 78 mothers and 50 sisters evaluated clinically, 19 (24%) mothers and 16 (32%) sisters had PCOS. In a study of Dutch women, there was a doubling of the incidence of PCOS in monozygotic twins (though the prevalence was no different to dizygotic twins and the PCOS definition was non-standard). Diagnosis The diagnosis excludes secondary causes, such as androgen-producing neoplasm, hyperprolactinaemia, and adult-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia. It is characterised by irregular menstrual cycles, scanty or absent menses, multiple small follicles on the ovaries (polycystic ovaries), mild hirsutism, and infertility. Many women also have insulin resistance, acne, and weight gain. Until recently, there was no overall consensus on the criteria for diagnosing PCOS. In some studies, it has been diagnosed based on the ultrasound findings of polycystic ovaries rather than on clinical criteria. An international consensus definition of PCOS has now been published, which defines PCOS as at least two of the following criteria: reduced or no ovulation; clinical and/or biochemical signs of excessive secretion of androgens; and/or polycystic ovaries (the presence of at least 12 follicles measuring 2–9 mm in diameter, an ovarian volume in excess of 10 mL, or both).

Prognosis

There is some evidence that women with PCOS are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disorders secondary to hyperlipidaemia, compared with women who do not have PCOS. A meta-analysis found a twofold increase in the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women with PCOS. However, although there is a higher risk of cardiovascular disorders, there is no apparent increase in risk of mortality. There is some evidence that oligomenorrhoeic and amenorrhoeic women are at increased risk of developing endometrial hyperplasia and, later, endometrial carcinoma.

Aims of intervention

To reduce hirsutism and restore regular menstrual cycle, with minimal adverse effects.

Outcomes

Hirsutism in women with hirsutism, measured by objective scales of reduction in hirsutism such as the Ferriman-Gallwey Scale, which quantifies the extent of hair growth in nine anatomical sites, scoring 0 (no hair) to 4 (maximal growth), with a maximum score of 36; personal perception of reduction in hirsutism. Menstruation frequency in women with oligomenorrhoea. Adverse effects. We have also reported on clinical outcomes that matter to people, rather than laboratory-based outcomes such as effects on hormone levels.

Methods

BMJ Clinical Evidence search and appraisal May 2014. The following databases were used to identify studies for this review: Medline 1966 to May 2014, Embase 1980 to May 2014, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, issue 5 (1966 to date of issue). Additional searches were carried out in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. We also searched for retractions of studies included in the review. Titles and abstracts of the studies identified by the initial search, run by an information specialist, were first assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence scanner. Full texts for potentially relevant studies were then assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence analyst. Studies selected for inclusion were discussed with an expert contributor. All data relevant to the review were then extracted by an evidence analyst. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were: published RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs in the English language, at least single-blinded for drug interventions. Interventions to achieve weight loss could be unblinded/open. The trials contained 20 or more individuals (10 in each arm), of whom more than 90% were followed up. There was a 3-month minimum length of follow-up for hirsutism outcomes, but no minimum length for other outcomes. We included RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs where harms of an included intervention were assessed, applying the same study design criteria for inclusion as we did for benefits. In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the FDA and the MHRA, which are added to the reviews as required. To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as RRs and ORs. We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table). The categorisation of the quality of the evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) reflects the quality of evidence available for our chosen outcomes in our defined populations of interest. These categorisations are not necessarily a reflection of the overall methodological quality of any individual study, because the Clinical Evidence population and outcome of choice may represent only a small subset of the total outcomes reported, and population included, in any individual trial. For further details of how we perform the GRADE evaluation and the scoring system we use, please see our website (www.clinicalevidence.com).

Table.

GRADE Evaluation of interventions for Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): metformin.

Important outcomes Hirsutism, Menstrual frequency
Studies (Participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of metformin on hirsutism and menstrual frequency in women with PCOS?
4 (unclear; no more than 190) Hirsutism Metformin versus placebo (with or without lifestyle intervention) 4 –2 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results; directness points deducted for no direct statistical analysis between groups and for co-intervention (diet)
9 (546) Menstrual frequency Metformin versus placebo (with or without lifestyle intervention) 4 –1 –1 –1 0 Very low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results; consistency point deducted for statistical heterogeneity among RCTs; directness point deducted for co-intervention (diet)
2 (117) Hirsutism Metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results; directness point deducted for no statistical analysis between groups
2 (unclear; no more than 140) Menstrual frequency Metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol 4 –2 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results; directness points deducted for no statistical analysis between groups in 1 RCT and unclear outcome in 1 RCT
1 (46) Hirsutism Metformin versus weight loss intervention 4 –2 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results; directness points deducted for no direct statistical analysis between groups and unclear outcome measurement
2 (unclear) Menstrual frequency Metformin versus weight loss intervention 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and weak methods; directness point deducted for unclear outcome measurement

We initially allocate 4 points to evidence from RCTs, and 2 points to evidence from observational studies. To attain the final GRADE score for a given comparison, points are deducted or added from this initial score based on preset criteria relating to the categories of quality, directness, consistency, and effect size. Quality: based on issues affecting methodological rigour (e.g., incomplete reporting of results, quasi-randomisation, sparse data [<200 people in the analysis]). Consistency: based on similarity of results across studies. Directness: based on generalisability of population or outcomes. Effect size: based on magnitude of effect as measured by statistics such as relative risk, odds ratio, or hazard ratio.

Glossary

Ferriman-Gallwey Scale

Hirsuitism scale that quantifies the extent of hair growth in nine anatomical sites, scoring 0 (no hair) to 4 (maximal growth), with a maximum score of 36.

Hirsutism

The presence of excessive male-pattern hair growth in women on the face, chest, linea alba, or lower back. It usually occurs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but 'idiopathic hirsutism' may occur in women with regular menstrual cycles and normal circulating androgen levels.

Oligomenorrhoea

Infrequent or scanty menstruation.

Very low-quality evidence

Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.

Contributor Information

David J. Cahill, University of Bristol and St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK.

Katherine O'Brien, University of Bristol and St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK.

References

  • 1.The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004;19:41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev 1997;18:774–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Legro RS, Driscoll D, Strauss JF 3rd, et al. Evidence for a genetic basis for hyperandrogenemia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:14956–14960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Joham AE, Teede HJ, Ranasinha S, et al. Prevalence of infertility and use of fertility treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: data from a large community-based cohort study. J Womens Health 2015 Feb 5 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yildiz BO, Bozdag G, Yapici Z, et al. Prevalence, phenotype and cardiometabolic risk of polycystic ovary syndrome under different diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3067–3073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alvarez-Blasco F, Botella-Carretero JI, San Millan JL, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of the polycystic ovary syndrome in overweight and obese women. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2081–2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kahsar-Miller MD, Nixon C, Boots LR, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in first-degree relatives of patients with PCOS. Fertil Steril 2001;75:53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vink JM, Sadrzadeh S, Lambalk CB, et al. Heritability of polycystic ovary syndrome in a Dutch twin-family study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2100–2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Dunaif A. Prevalence and predictors of dyslipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Med 2001;111:607–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Groot PC, Dekkers OM, Romijn JA, et al. PCOS, coronary heart disease, stroke and the influence of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:495–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pierpoint T, McKeigue PM, Isaacs AJ, et al. Mortality of women with polycystic ovary syndrome at long-term follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:581–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hardiman P, Pillay OS, Atiomo W. Polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial carcinoma. Lancet 2003;361:1810–1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Niwa K, Imai A, Hashimoto M, et al. A case-control study of uterine endometrial cancer of pre- and post-menopausal women. Oncol Rep 2000;7:89–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tang T, Lord JM, Norman RJ, et al. Insulin-sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D-chiro-inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility. In: The Cochrane Library, issue 5, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2011. 22592687 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gambineri A, Pelusi C, Genghini S, et al. Effect of flutamide and metformin administered alone or in combination in dieting obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 2004;60:241–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gambineri A, Patton L, Vaccina A, et al. Treatment with flutamide, metformin, and their combination added to a hypocaloric diet in overweight-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, 12-month, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:3970–3980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pasquali R, Gambineri A, Biscotti D, et al. Effect of long-term treatment with metformin added to hypocaloric diet on body composition, fat distribution, and androgen and insulin levels in abdominally obese women with and without the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:2767–2774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fux Otta C, Wior M, Iraci GS, et al. Clinical, metabolic, and endocrine parameters in response to metformin and lifestyle intervention in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo control trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010;26:173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang T, Glanville J, Hayden CJ, et al. Combined lifestyle modification and metformin in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre study. Human Reprod 2006;21:80–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. Metformin effects on clinical features, endocrine and metabolic profiles, and insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month trial, followed by open, long-term clinical evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:139–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Costello M, Shrestha B, Eden J, et al. Insulin-sensitising drugs versus the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne and risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and endometrial cancer in polycystic ovary syndrome. In: The Cochrane Library, issue 5, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jing Z, Liang-Zhi X, Tai-Xiang W, et al. The effects of Diane-35 and metformin in treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an updated systematic review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2008;24:590–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu J, Zhu Y, Jiang Y, et al. Effects of metformin and ethinyl estradiol-cyproterone acetate on clinical, endocrine and metabolic factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol 2008;24:392–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cetinkalp S, Karadeniz M, Erdogan M, et al. The effects of rosiglitazone, metformin, and estradiol-cyproterone acetate on lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinologist 2009;19:94–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.World Health Organization. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter. 2003;3:5. Available at http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/newsletter/en/news2003_3.pdf (last accessed 24 March 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Mullan RJ, et al. Lifestyle modification programs in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:4655–4663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Qublan HS, Yannakoula EK, Al-Qudah MA, et al. Dietary intervention versus metformin to improve the reproductive outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A prospective comparative study. Saudi Med J 2007;28:1694–1699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karimzadeh MA, Javedani M. An assessment of lifestyle modification versus medical treatment with clomiphene citrate, metformin, and clomiphene citrate-metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2010;94:216–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 27;2015:1408.

Metformin versus placebo or no treatment

Summary

We found limited evidence that metformin may improve menstrual frequency compared with placebo.

Some trials also included a diet or a diet plus exercise intervention in both groups.

We found insufficient evidence on the effects of metformin compared with placebo or no treatment on hirsutism.

Metformin may be associated with an increase of gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with placebo.

Benefits and harms

Metformin versus placebo (with or without lifestyle intervention):

We found one systematic review (search date 2011), and two additional RCTs. The review pooled data on menstrual frequency but did not report on hirsutism, so we have also reported two RCTs included in the review directly from their original report. The review included RCTs in women with oligomenorrhoea and anovulatory PCOS, and included additional data obtained from some of the original authors of the included RCTs. Several RCTs also included a background dietary or exercise co-intervention in both groups, and where this occurred, we have highlighted this in the study description (see Further information on studies).

Hirsutism

Metformin compared with placebo Metformin may be no more effective than placebo at reducing hirsutism in women with PCOS who are also receiving a low-calorie diet/exercise intervention; however, the evidence was from small, weak RCTs only (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hirsutism

RCT
4-armed trial
40 women, 20 with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Reduction in Ferriman-Gallwey scores from baseline 6 months
with metformin
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

No direct comparison between groups
P = 0.022 for change from baseline with metformin
P = 0.125 for change from baseline with placebo

RCT
4-armed trial
80 overweight or obese women with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Mean reduction in Ferriman-Gallwey scores from baseline 6 months
13.0 to 10.9 with metformin
9.3 to 8.0 with placebo

No direct comparison between groups
P <0.01 with metformin from baseline
P <0.05 with placebo from baseline
See Further information on studies

RCT
4-armed trial
80 overweight or obese women with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Mean reduction in Ferriman-Gallwey scores from baseline 12 months
13.0 to 10.4 with metformin
9.3 to 8.0 with placebo

No direct comparison between groups
P <0.01 with metformin from baseline
P <0.05 with placebo from baseline
See Further information on studies

RCT
40 women, 20 with PCOS, all with BMI >28
In review
Reduction in Ferriman-Gallwey score from baseline 6 months
14.8 to 12.9 with metformin
11.5 to 10.5 with placebo

No direct comparison between groups
P <0.05 with metformin from baseline
P value reported as not significant
CI not reported for placebo from baseline

RCT
30 women with PCOS (20–34 years old), with oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea
In review
Change in Ferriman-Gallwey score (measured by a modification of Ferriman-Gallwey method; further details not reported) from baseline–4 months
11.73 to 11.60 with metformin
13.50 to 13.00 with placebo

No direct comparison between groups
P = 0.47 with metformin from baseline
P = 0.46 with placebo from baseline
The RCT reported that it did not find changes in other signs of hyperandrogenism such as acne, seborrhoeic dermatitis, or androgenic alopecia; further details were not reported

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Menstrual frequency

Metformin compared with placebo Metformin may be more effective than placebo at improving menstrual frequency (not further defined) in women with PCOS who may or may not be also receiving a low-calorie diet/exercise intervention. However, evidence was weak (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Menstrual frequency

Systematic review
427 women with PCOS, oligomenorrhoea, or amenorrhoea, mean age in studies about 20–30 years
7 RCTs in this analysis
Improvement in menstrual frequency (outcome measure not further defined)
91/207 (44%) with metformin
72/220 (33%) with placebo

OR 1.72
95% CI 1.14 to 2.61
P = 0.01
Significant heterogeneity among RCTs for this analysis ( I2 = 54%, P for heterogeneity 0.03)
See Further information on studies
Small effect size metformin

RCT
4-armed trial
40 women, 20 with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Improvement in menstrual frequency 6 months
with metformin
with placebo
Absolute results reported graphically

P = 0.054 for metformin v placebo
Menstrual frequency significantly improved from baseline in women taking metformin
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
80 overweight or obese women with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Increase in mean number of menses 6 months
2.6 to 4.3 with metformin
2.7 to 3.2 with placebo

P = 0.031 for metformin v placebo
See Further information on studies
Effect size not calculated metformin

RCT
4-armed trial
80 overweight or obese women with PCOS, all with BMI >28 Increase in mean number of menses 12 months
2.6 to 4.6 with metformin
2.7 to 3.2 with placebo

P = 0.003 for metformin v placebo
See Further information on studies
Effect size not calculated metformin

RCT
40 women, 20 with PCOS, all with BMI >28
In review
Change from baseline in menstrual frequency 6 months
3.5 with metformin
2.2 with placebo

P <0.05
This RCT was included in the review but was not included in the meta-analysis for improvement in menstrual frequency
We have, therefore, reported the RCT directly from the original report
Effect size not calculated metformin

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

Systematic review
23 women with PCOS, oligomenorrhoea, or amenorrhoea, mean age in studies about 20–30 years
Data from 1 RCT
Nausea and vomiting
5/11 (45%) with metformin
2/12 (17%) with placebo

OR 4.17
95% CI 0.61 to 28.62
Not significant

Systematic review
92 women with PCOS, oligomenorrhoea, or amenorrhoea, mean age in studies about 20–30 years
Data from 1 RCT
Gastrointestinal disturbance (other than nausea and vomiting)
15/45 (33%) with metformin
5/47 (11%) with placebo

OR 4.20
95% CI 1.38 to 12.81
Moderate effect size placebo

Systematic review
23 women with PCOS, oligomenorrhoea, or amenorrhoea, mean age in studies about 20–30 years
Data from 1 RCT
Gastrointestinal disturbance (other than nausea and vomiting)
2/11 (18%) with metformin
0/12 (0%) with placebo

OR = 6.58
95% CI 0.28 to 153.74
Not significant

Systematic review
Crossover design
120 women with PCOS, oligomenorrhoea, or amenorrhoea, mean age in studies about 20–30 years
Data from 1 RCT
Gastrointestinal disturbance (other than nausea and vomiting)
19/60 (32%) with metformin
2/60 (3%) with placebo

OR 27.13
95% CI 6.07 to 121.31
Post-crossover result
Large effect size placebo

RCT
143 anovulatory women with PCOS, BMI >30
In review
Adverse effects
with metformin
with placebo

Further information on studies

The systematic review found significant heterogeneity between the RCTs for menstrual frequency (I2 54%). It reported a sub-group analysis by BMI for menstrual frequency (participants with BMI <30 kg/m2: 1 RCT, 23 women, OR 21.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 445.00; participants with BMI 30 kg/m2 or above: 6 RCTs, 404 women, OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.41, I2 51%), which did not improve heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis for menstrual frequency by study quality, which included five RCTs, did not markedly improve heterogeneity or change the inference (further numerical details not reported).

The RCT reported that women were excluded if they were on any medication, if they had a significant change in body weight, or if they were dieting in the previous 3 months. However, it is not clear whether the 40 women from the earlier study had a treatment washout period, whether they continued on the same treatment, or whether they would have received the same treatment after randomisation.

In one RCT included in the review, women taking placebo had a significantly higher BMI at baseline compared with women taking metformin (P <0.05). Women taking placebo also had higher fasting insulin than women taking metformin (P value reported as not significant) but similar insulin sensitivity. This may have biased results in favour of metformin.

Comment

Many RCTs we found reported effects on infertility as their primary outcome, and effects on hirsutism and menstrual patterns were more sparingly reported.

Clinical guide

Weight loss can affect menstrual cycles. In studies where weight loss has occurred as well as taking metformin, we cannot deduce that any improvement in menstrual cycle is only because of the metformin. Those RCTs confuse the issue, and we need to clarify that weight loss might be an independent confounding factor.

Substantive changes

Metformin versus placebo or no treatment Option restructured to include only the comparison of metformin with placebo or no treatment. New evidence added. Categorised as 'likely to be beneficial'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 27;2015:1408.

Metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

Summary

We found little high-quality evidence on the comparative effects of metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol on hirsutism or menstrual frequency.

We don’t know how metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol compare at improving hirsutism.

Some unblinded RCTs found no significant difference between groups with regard to hirsutism scores. However, these data should be interpreted with caution.

We don’t know how metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol compare at improving menstrual frequency.

Although trials did not directly compare differences between groups, absolute rates of improvement of menses as measured by increased regularity were higher with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol in some RCTs.

Metformin may be associated with increased gastrointestinal effects (including nausea and diarrhoea) compared with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol, resulting in the need to stop medication.

Cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol may be associated with an increase of other adverse effects compared with metformin, such as weight gain, high blood pressure, chest pain, and headache, resulting in the need to stop medication.

Benefits and harms

Metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol:

We found two systematic reviews (search date 2005; 2008). We also found two subsequent RCTs. The first systematic review pooled data on hirsutism, but the RCTs did not meet the quality criteria for this BMJ Clinical Evidence review (see Further information on studies). The second systematic review also pooled data on hirsutism at 3 months and 6 months, but the RCTs did not meet the quality criteria for this BMJ Clinical Evidence review (see Further information on studies). The first subsequent three-armed RCT compared metformin, cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol plus metformin for 3 months. The second subsequent three-armed RCT compared metformin, cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol, and rosiglitazone and reported outcomes at 4 months.

Hirsutism

Metformin compared with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol We don’t know whether metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol differ in effectiveness at improving hirsutism scores in women with PCOS, as we found insufficient evidence from small, weak RCTs (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hirsutism

RCT
3-armed trial
60 women with PCOS
Subgroup analysis
Change in Ferriman-Gallwey hirsutism scores from pre-treatment to post-treatment
8.1 to 7.7 with metformin
8.3 to 6.8 with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

No direct comparison between groups
P >0.05 with metformin from baseline
P <0.05 with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol from baseline
The RCT only reported a sub-group analysis based on initial BMI

RCT
3-armed trial
60 women with PCOS
Subgroup analysis
Change in Ferriman-Gallwey hirsutism score from pre-treatment to post treatment
7.6 to 7.4 with metformin
7.8 to 6.9 with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

No direct comparison between groups
P >0.05 with metformin from baseline
P <0.05 with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol from baseline
The RCT only reported a sub-group analysis based on initial BMI

RCT
3-armed trial
100 women with PCOS Change in Ferriman-Gallwey score from baseline to 4 months
12.71 to 10.55 with metformin
15.07 to 12.03 with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

Significance not reported for comparison of metformin v cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol
Both groups significantly improved from baseline (P <0.05)

Menstrual frequency

Metformin compared with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol We don’t know whether metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol differ in effectiveness at improving menstrual regularity in women with PCOS, as we found insufficient evidence from small, weak RCTs (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Menstrual frequency

RCT
3-armed trial
60 women with PCOS Menstrual regularity (regular menses, not further defined) at end of trial
28% with metformin
100% with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol
Absolute numbers not reported

P value not reported

RCT
3-armed trial
100 women with PCOS Proportion of women with amenorrhoea from baseline–4 months
9/47 (19%) to 3/47 (6%) with metformin
7/33 (21%) to 2/33 (6%) with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

Significance not reported for metformin v cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

RCT
3-armed trial
100 women with PCOS Proportion of women with oligomenorrhoea from baseline–4 months
29/47 (62%) to 11/47 (23%) with metformin
28/33 (85%) to 0/33 (0%) with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

Significance not reported for metformin v cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

Systematic review
104 women
3 RCTs in this analysis
Severe adverse effects requiring stopping of medication (weight gain, high blood pressure, depression, chest pain, headache)
0/52 (0%) with metformin
10/52 (19%) with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

OR 0.11
95% CI 0.03 to 0.39
P = 0.00080
Caution should be taken in interpreting these results, as all the RCTs were unblinded (see Further information on studies)
Large effect size metformin

Systematic review
104 women
3 RCTs in this analysis
Severe gastrointestinal adverse effects requiring stopping of medication (nausea, diarrhoea)
5/52 (10%) with metformin
0/52 (0%) with cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

OR 7.75
95% CI 1.32 to 45.71
P = 0.010
Caution should be taken in interpreting these results, as all the RCTs were unblinded (see Further information on studies)
Large effect size cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

Hirsutism: the review included pooled data on hirsutism for three RCTs. However, all the RCTs were unblinded, and it did not perform an ITT analysis. It found no significant difference between metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol in hirsutism using the Ferriman-Gallwey (FG) scoring system (2 RCTs, analysis included 35/52 [67%] of women initially randomised, mean difference +2.66, 95% CI –0.33 to +5.66, P = 0.081). One other RCT found a significant improvement with metformin using a subjective (VAS 0–10) hirsutism score (1 RCT, analysis included 34/52 [65%] of women initially randomised, mean difference 2.70, 95% CI 0.99 to 4.41, P = 0.0019). In this RCT, all women had an FG score above eight at baseline. A further analysis including all three RCTs found no significant difference between groups in hirsutism (FG and subjective) score (3 RCTs, analysis included 69/104 [66%] of women initially randomised, SMD –0.18, 95% CI –0.67 to +0.32, P = 0.48). There was significant heterogeneity among RCTs for this analysis (I2 80%, P for heterogeneity = 0.01).

Menstrual frequency: the review also provided a pooled analysis of two unblinded trials which found that metformin was significantly less effective at improving menstrual pattern (2 RCTs, analysis included 35/52 [67%] of women initially randomised, OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.45, P = 0.0042).

Methods: the most recent review included eight RCTs. Of these, five RCTs had unclear randomisation, six RCTs did not use blinding, allocation concealment was either not used or unclear in six RCTs, and withdrawal rate varied from 0% to 44%.

Hirsutism: the review reported pooled data on hirsutism at 3 months. Although it did not directly identify the two RCTs included in the analysis, in another table it identified two unblinded RCTs that reported outcomes at 3 months. However, it is not clear whether it was these RCTs included in the analysis or not. It found no significant difference between metformin and cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol in hirsutism (3 months, FG score: 2 RCTs, 42 women, mean difference –2.12, 95% CI –4.78 to +0.53, P = 0.12, absolute numbers not reported). It also reported no significant difference between groups at 6 months or longer (FG score: 3 RCTs, 69 women, mean difference +0.49, 95% CI –1.92 to +2.91, P = 0.69). This analysis included the same three RCTs pooled by the other review for hirsutism. Again, there was significant heterogeneity among RCTs (I2 83%, P for heterogeneity = 0.002).

Menstrual frequency: the review did not report data on this outcome.

Comment

Cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

Substantive changes

Metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol Option restructured to include only the comparison of metformin versus cyproterone acetate-ethinylestradiol. New evidence added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 27;2015:1408.

Metformin versus weight loss intervention

Summary

We found insufficient evidence, from two small RCTs, to draw reliable conclusions on how metformin compares to a weight loss intervention in regulating the menstrual cycle and on symptoms of hirsutism .

Benefits and harms

Metformin versus weight loss intervention:

We found one systematic review (search date 2011), which compared lifestyle modification programmes (modification of diet and/or physical activity) with metformin in women with PCOS. The systematic review did not report pooled data on our outcomes of interest. We have, therefore, reported two RCTs included in the review that matched the quality criteria for this BMJ Clinical Evidence review from their original reports. The first RCT compared metformin with a 1200–1400 kcal diet (25% proteins, 25% fat, 50% carbohydrates, plus 25–30 g of fibre per week; see Further information on studies). The second RCT was a four-armed trial. We have reported the two arms that compared metformin with a lifestyle intervention, which comprised a low-calorie diet (500 calories less than daily requirements) plus an exercise programme (in accordance with a prescribed rehabilitation menu, 3–5 times per week, each time for 20–60 minutes). See Further information on studies. Many RCTs that compared metformin with placebo or no treatment also included diet and/or exercise in both groups as a background intervention (see Metformin versus placebo or no treatment).

Hirsutism

Metformin versus weight loss intervention We don’t know whether metformin and a diet intervention (1200–1400 kcal diet) differ in effectiveness at improving hirsutism scores in women with PCOS (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Hirsutism

RCT
46 women with PCOS, aged 19–38 years, mean BMI about 32 kg/m2, mean duration of infertility about 5.2–5.4 years
In review
Proportion of women with hirsutism (measure of hirsutism not further defined) before and after treatment
16/22 (73%) to 13/22 (59%) with metformin
15/24 (63%) to 13/24 (54%) with diet intervention

P value between groups not reported
See Further information on studies

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Menstrual frequency

Metformin versus weight loss intervention We don’t know whether metformin differs from a weight loss intervention (a diet intervention or a diet plus exercise intervention) in effectiveness at improving menstrual frequency in women with PCOS (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Menstrual frequency

RCT
46 women with PCOS, aged 19–38 years, mean BMI about 32 kg/m2, mean duration of infertility about 5.2–5.4 years
In review
Menstrual cycle pattern (regular/irregular; further definition not reported) after treatment
with metformin
with diet intervention
Absolute results not reported

Reported as no significant difference
P value not reported
Unclear as to which data this analysis relates to
See Further information on studies
Not significant

RCT
46 women with PCOS, aged 19–38 years, mean BMI about 32 kg/m2, mean duration of infertility about 5.2–5.4 years
In review
Subgroup analysis
Resumption of regular cycles (proportion of women going from having irregular cycle to resumption of regular cycles) 6 months
11/18 (61%) with metformin
13/21 (62%) with diet intervention

Reported as no significant difference
P value not reported
See Further information on studies
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
343 women with PCOS, mean age 27 years, mean infertile period 3.9–4.5 years among 4 groups
In review
Improvement rates of menstrual cycle (further definition of outcome measure not reported)
56% with metformin
67% with lifestyle modification
Absolute numbers not reported

P value not reported for direct comparison of metformin v lifestyle modification
See Further information on studies

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects
46 women with PCOS, aged 19–38 years, mean BMI about 32 kg/m2, mean duration of infertility about 5.2–5.4 years
In review
Diarrhoea
21% with metformin

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

The RCT did not report on weight loss directly, but reported changes in BMI during the trial (before and after treatment: 31.9 to 27.8 kg/m2 with metformin v 32.2 to 27.4 kg/m2 with diet intervention; reported as both groups had significant reduction from baseline, no between-group analysis reported). Randomisation was by table of random numbers, but details of allocation concealment and levels of blinding were unclear. It reported that both treatments were continued until the woman resumed the first regular cycle (within 24–35 days of treatment), and when there was no resumption or evidence of ovulation, both treatments were continued for 6 months.

Before women could be included in this RCT they needed to have achieved a 5% weight loss, as this was needed to start menstrual cycles. It is not clear how this would have affected the results of the study. The RCT did not describe methods of randomisation, allocation concealment, or blinding. The RCT did not report on weight loss or changes in BMI, but reported that waist circumference was significantly lowered in the diet and exercise group compared with the other three groups (P = 0.001; no further details reported).The 5% weight loss that was achieved may have affected the results of the study, especially menstrual regularity.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

Metformin versus weight loss intervention Option restructured to include only the comparison of metformin with weight loss intervention. New evidence added. Categorised as 'unknown effectiveness'.


Articles from BMJ Clinical Evidence are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES