Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2014 Dec 17;55(51):7002–7006. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.10.114

Diels-Alder reactions of five-membered heterocycles containing one heteroatom

Xiaoyuan Ding 1, Son T Nguyen 1, John D Williams 1, Norton P Peet 1,*
PMCID: PMC4378267  NIHMSID: NIHMS648498  PMID: 25838605

Abstract

Diels-Alder reactions of five-membered heterocycles containing one heteroatom with an N-arylmaleimide were studied. Cycloaddition of 2,5-dimethylfuran (4) with 2-(4-methylphenyl)maleimide (3) in toluene at 60 °C gave bicyclic adduct 5. Cycloadditions of 3 with 2,5-dimethylthiophene (11) and 1,2,5-trimethylpyrrole (14) were also studied. Interestingly, the bicyclic compound 5 cleanly rearranged, with loss of water, when treated with p-toluenesulfonic acid in toluene at 80 °C to give 4,7-dimethyl-2-p-tolylisoindoline-1,3-dione (6).

Keywords: Diels-Alder reactions, dienes, dienophiles, acid-catalyzed reactions


We recently reported a screening campaign for type three secretion system (T3SS) inhibitors that identified differentiated hit compounds, which we grouped into three scaffolds.1 One of these scaffolds was represented by the bicyclic compound 5, and close analogs with different substituents in the phenyl ring.1 Our first task was to prepare an authentic sample of compound 5 to confirm activity. We also wished to explore rearrangement chemistry that the bicyclic compound 5 might undergo, as we predicted may happen, upon treatment with acid. In addition, we explored the biological activity of similar compounds and synthesized compounds related to 5 with varied heteroatoms in the oxygen-containing bridge. The findings from these synthetic investigations are presented in this manuscript.

The synthesis of hit compound 5 is presented in Scheme 1. Solutions of p-toluidine (1) and maleic anhydride (2) in tetrahydrofuran were combined, and after 15 minutes, the solvent was decanted and the remaining solid was treated with acetic anhydride and sodium acetate at 120 °C with microwave irradiation to produce 1-p-tolyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (3) in 62% yield.24 Subsequent treatment of maleimide 3 with 2,5-dimethylfuran (4) in toluene at 80 °C gave the exo Diels-Alder adduct 5 in 50% yield. It is well-known that both furan5, 6 and 2,5-dimethylfuran79 produce exo Diels-Alder adducts with maleimides under elevated temperature conditions, and that an endo product can be produced if the Diels-Alder reaction is done at room temperature and kept in the dark.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of bicyclic Diels-Alder adduct 5 and its conversion to phthalimide 6.

Interestingly, we were able to effect a very efficient, very clean conversion of bicyclic compound 5 to 4,7-dimethyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)phthalimide (6) in quantitative yield. This acid-catalyzed rearrangement proceeded in toluene at reflux in the presence of a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid. Although we could not find other examples of this exact conversion, we did find a somewhat related dehydrative rearrangement of a tricyclic dihydrofuran compound that produced a 2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-as-indacene-1,8-dione10. Also, there are reports of the preparation of phthalimides directly from 2,5-dimethylfuran (4) and maleimides, wherein the intermediate Diels-Alder adducts are not isolated but are presumably intermediates that rearrange in situ.11, 12 The mechanism that we propose for the conversion of 5 to 6 is shown in Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Proposed mechanism for the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of Diels-Alder adduct 5 to phthalimide 6.

We prepared an authentic sample of phthalimide 6, using a recently reported procedure,4 to verify the structure. Treatment of commercially available 4,7-dimethylphthalimide (7) with p-toluidine (1) in dimethylformamide using microwave conditions (Scheme 1) produced an authentic sample of 6, which was identical in every respect to the material produced from the very efficient, acid-catalyzed dehydrative rearrangement of exo adduct 5.

Moreover, we were able to also produce the endo adduct from the Diels-Alder reaction of imide 3 with 2,5-dimethylfuran (4), when we used diethyl ether as the solvent at room temperature, as shown in Scheme 3. The distinguishing characteristic between the exo and endo regiochemistries in these adducts is the position of the bridgehead protons alpha to the carbonyl groups. These protons appear as a singlet at δ 2.97 (CDCl3) for the exo adduct 5, and at δ 3.37 (CDCl3) for the endo adduct 10. These assignments for exo and endo isomers for maleimide adducts with 2,5-dimethylfuran (4), where the exo bridgehead protons are consistently ca. δ 0.40 ppm upfield with respect to the endo isomer, are well-documented in the literature.9, 10

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Preparation of endo Diels-Alder adduct 10 from maleimide 3 and furan 4.

We next explored the reactivity of imide 3 with 2,5-dimethylthiophene (11) as shown in Scheme 4. Although diene 11 was not reactive enough to undergo [2+4] cycloaddition with 3 in toluene at 60 °C, we were able to produce a cycloadduct in the presence of m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, which converted thiophene 11 to its corresponding sulfoxide in situ to provide a more reactive diene. The structure of this adduct is the endo adduct 13, which is completely analogous to another reported cycloadduct whose structure was confirmed by X-ray diffraction.13, 14 Interestingly, adduct 13 also underwent acid-catalyzed rearrangement with p-toluenesulfonic acid in toluene, albeit at a significantly slower rate than 6 was produced from 5, to give phthalimide 6.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Preparation of thiophene sulfoxide Diels-Alder adduct 13 and its rearrangement to phthalimide 6.

We also attempted to prepare a Diels-Alder adduct between 1,2,5-trimethylpyrrole (14) and maleimide 3. It is reported that cycloaddition reactions of pyrroles with alkenes are limited by the inherent thermodynamic instability of the cycloadducts wherein cycloreversion or retro-Mannich reactions (followed by rearomatization) are predominant.1517 When we treated pyrrole 14 with maleimide 3, in toluene at 60 °C as shown in Scheme 5, we observed no cycloadducts from these reactants. However, we did obtain a small amount of adduct that arose from maleimide 3 and a furan-containing contaminant that was present in our commercial sample of 14, which we determined to have an empirical formula of C19H19NO3 from mass spectral analysis. We proposed, from nmr analysis, that this compound should have one of the structures shown at the bottom of Scheme 5, (i.e., structures 16–18). We realized that three additional structures were theoretically possible, wherein the carbomethoxy group would reside at the bridgehead position next to the ether oxygen. However, we considered these structures less likely, since they would be products arising from a less reactive, more electron poor diene.18

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Attempted preparation of a Diels-Alder adduct between 1,2,5-trimethylpyrrole (14) and maleimide 3, and potential structures of the unknown product.

We first prepared an authentic sample of compound 16, to determine whether this might be the material formed from maleimide 3 and a substituted furan impurity that was present in our commercial sample of 14. As shown in Scheme 6, we treated methyl 3-oxovalerate (19) with propargyl bromide (20), in the presence of cuprous iodide and DBU in toluene at 90 °C for 26 h19 to provide 2,5-dimethylfurancarboxylic acid methyl ester (21). Furan 21 underwent cycloaddition with maleimide 3 in modest yield to give the expected cycloadduct 16. Although the spectral data for compound 16 was very similar to the spectral data gathered for the unknown compound, the two materials were distinct. For instance, the bridgehead protons for compound 16 appeared at δ 3.12 and δ 3.02 (coupling constant 6.3 Hz, CHCl3), whereas these bridgehead protons in the unknown compound appeared at δ 3.12 and δ 3.06 (coupling constant 6.6 Hz, CHCl3) for the unknown compound. The biggest difference in the 1H nmr spectra of these compounds was that the vinyl proton in compound 16 appeared as a singlet at δ 7.06, and this signal was not present in the unknown compound, but its counterpart signal was a singlet that appeared at δ 5.10. The 13C position for the carbon atom bearing this proton in the unknown compound appeared at δ 84.34 ppm (CHCl3), which we felt was upfield from where a vinyl carbon signal should appear. These data suggested that compounds 17 or 18 would better fit the data, as these compounds would have allylic protons in the δ 5 ppm range and would have an allylic bridgehead carbon signal downfield from δ 84.34 ppm. Thus, we next set out to prepare an authentic sample of compound 17.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Synthesis of an authentic sample of compound 16.

The synthesis of compound 17 is shown in Scheme 7. Propargyl alcohol (22) was acylated with methyl chloroformate (23) to give methyl prop-2-ynyl carbonate (24).20 Treatment of carbonate 24 with methyl acetoacetate under palladium-catalyzed conditions, followed by treatment with 2 M aqueous hydrochloric acid gave a modest yield of 2,4-dimethylfuran-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester (25). Furan 25 underwent very clean and efficient cycloaddition with maleimide 3 in toluene at 60 °C to provide compound 17, which was identical in every respect with the unknown cycloadduct that was isolated from the treatment of 1,2,5-trimethylpyrrole (14) with maleimide 3.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Synthesis of an authentic sample of compound 17.

The regiochemistry of exo adduct 17 is clearly demonstrated by examining the 1H nmr spectrum, which displays coupling between the maleimide bridgehead protons (as previously described) and no observed coupling between the furan bridgehead proton and the adjacent maleimide bridgehead proton. Inspection of a structural model for this compound reveals that the dihedral angle defined by these two bridgehead protons and the carbons to which they are attached is close to 90°. Lack of observed coupling between protons configured with a dihedral angle of 90° is consistent with the prediction from the Karplus equation.21, 22 An endo regiochemistry, where the dihedral angle is ca. 60°, would clearly display coupling between the furan bridgehead proton and the adjacent maleimide bridgehead proton of ca. 4.5 Hz.

It is not clear why our commercial sample of pyrrole 14 was contaminated with furan 25.23 The classic synthesis of 2,5-dimethylpyrrole involves the condensation of acetonylacetone with ammonium carbonate,24 and this process produces pyrrole 14 if methylamine25 or N-methylformamide26 is substituted for ammonium carbonate. It is difficult to imagine the coproduction of furan 25 using these synthetic routes. Pyrroles are also commonly prepared using the Knorr pyrrole synthesis,2730 and it is conceivable that furan 25 might have been produced as a coproduct using this procedure. We felt it was important to spend the considerable effort that we did to establish the structure of cycloadduct 17 with the reactive maleimide 3, since pyrrole 14 was completely unreactive with 3, but 3 was very reactive with the minor component, furan 25. Thus, this structural information is now available to others who might encounter similar difficulties in treating pyrrole 14 with additional dienophiles.

We did consider further studies with other pyrroles to effect cycloaddition products with maleimide 3. However, as previously mentioned, cycloadducts of pyrroles with dienophiles are inherently thermodynamically unstable.1517 Osmium complexation of pyrroles has allowed the production of cycloadducts with maleimides and other dienophiles; however, decomplexation is not straightforward and stable cycloadducts can only be isolated after reduction of the resulting dihydropyrrole.15 The greater aromatic character of pyrroles, as compared with furans or thiophenes, limits their reactivity towards cycloaddition reactions.15

Recent reports have described the preparation of phosphole-N-phenylmaleimide [4+2] cycloadducts as precursors to the preparation of nucleophilic phosphinidines,31 secondary phosphine-borane complexes,32 and dibromophosphines.33 Interestingly, these cycloadducts are endo adducts, as shown by X-ray crystallography.32 Thus, it is possible to perform [4+2] cycloadditions of N-phenylmaleimides with five-membered ring heterocycles containing one heteroatom, when that single heteroatom is oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen or phosphorous.

In summary, we have investigated the cycloaddition reactions of N-arylmaleimide 3 with furans and thiophenes, and shown that the cycloadducts with 2,5-dimethylfuran (4) and 2,5-dimethylthiophene S-oxide undergo acid-catalyzed rearrangements to produce phthalimide 6. Although 1,2,5-trimethylpyrrole (14) did not undergo cycloaddition with 3 under the conditions we employed, we isolated and characterized the interesting cycloadduct 17 that was produced from furan 25, which was present as an impurity in the sample of 14 that we used.

Supplementary Material

NIHMS648498-supplement.docx (169.1KB, docx)

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by DHHS/NIH grant R43 AI-068185 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version.

References and notes

  • 1.Aiello D, Williams JD, Majgier-Baranowska H, Patel I, Peet NP, Huang J, Lory S, Bowlin TL, Moir DT. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1988. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01598-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sortino M, Garibotto F, Zacchino S, Enriz R, Filho VC, Gupta M. Bioorg. Med Chem. 2011;19:2823. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uchoa AF, Iamamoto Y, Serra OA, Baptista MS, Bortoluzzi AJ, De Oliveira KT. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:8824. doi: 10.1021/jo201568n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Upadhyay SK, Pingali SRK, Jursic BS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010:2215–2217. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Villemin E, Herent M-F, Marchand-Brynaert J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012:6165. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kwart M, Burchuk IJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952;74:3094. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salvati ME, Balog A, Shan W, Rampulla R, Giese S, Mitt T, Furch JA, Vite GD, Attar RM, Jure-Kunkel M, Geng J, Rizzo CA, Gottardis MM, Krystek SR, Gougoutas J, Galella MA, Obermeier M, Fura A, Chandrasena G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18:1910. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiao H-Y, Balog A, Attar RM, Fairfax D, Fleming LB, Holst CL, Martin GS, Rossiter LM, Chen J, Cvjic M-E, Dell-John J, Geng J, Gotardis MM, Han W-C, Nation A, Obermeier M, Rizzo CA, Schweizer L, Spires T, Shan W, Gavai A, Salvati ME, Vite G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:4491. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balog JA, Fairfax DJ, Martin GS, Salvati ME, Xiao H-Y. 7,550,458 B2. US Patent. 2009 Jun 23;
  • 10.Pailer M, Zeisl E. Monatsh. Chem. 1977;108:331–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fraile JM, Garcia JI, Gomez MA, de la Hoz A, Mayoral JA, Moreno A, Prieto P, Salvatella L, Vazquez E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001:2891. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ray FE, Sawicki E, Borum OH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952:1247. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Y, Thieman T, Sawada T, Mataka S, Tashiro MJ. Org. Chem. 1997;62:7296. doi: 10.1021/jo961985z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naperstkow AM, Macaulay JB, Newlands MJ, Fallis AG. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989;30:5077. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonzalez J, Koontz JI, Hodges LM, Nilsson KR, Neely LK, Myers WH, Sabat M, Harman WD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:3405. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Corey EJ, Loh TP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:3979. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jung ME, Rohloff JC. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1984:630. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Craig D, Shipman JJ, Fowler RB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961;83:2885. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arcadi A, Cerechelli G, Chiarini M, Di Giuseppe S, Marinelli F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:9195. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsuji J, Watanabe H, Minami I, Shimizu IJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:2196. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karplus MJ. Chem. Phys. 1959;30:11. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Karplus MJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963;85:2870. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.1,2,5-Trimethylpyrrole, Lot# S32221V, from Aldrich Chemical Company, was used for this study. Purity was listed at 99%, which was in concurrence with our NMR analysis. Our analysis also confirmed that methyl 2,4-dimethylpyrrole-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester (25) was present (ca. 1%) as an impurity.
  • 24.Young DM, Allen CF. H. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. 2. 1943:219. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moon MW, Wade RA. J. Org. Chem. 1984;49:2663. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alexander RS, Butler AR. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2. 1980:110. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Knorr L. Ber. 1884;17:1635. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Knorr L. Ann. 1886;236:290. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Knorr L, Lange H. Ber. 1902;35:2998. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Corwin AH. Heterocyclic Compounds. 1950;1:287. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tian R, Duan Z, Zhou X, Geng D, Wu Y. Chem. Commun. 2009:2589. doi: 10.1039/b901154d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tian R, Mathey F. 2010;29:1873. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang L, Zhang L, Shi H, Duan Z, Mathey F. Synlett. 2013;24:2006. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

NIHMS648498-supplement.docx (169.1KB, docx)

RESOURCES