Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 Feb 22;66(7):2041–2054. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv005

Ethylene is critical to the maintenance of primary root growth and Fe homeostasis under Fe stress in Arabidopsis

Guangjie Li 1, Weifeng Xu 1, Herbert J Kronzucker 2, Weiming Shi 1,*
PMCID: PMC4378635  PMID: 25711703

Highlight

We propose that ethylene is involved in the regulation of excess Fe tolerance by maintenance of tissue Fe and K homeostasis in Arabidopsis.

Key words: Arabidopsis, ethylene, Fe homeostasis, Fe toxicity, primary root growth.

Abstract

Iron (Fe) is an essential microelement but is highly toxic when in excess. The response of plant roots to Fe toxicity and the nature of the regulatory pathways engaged are poorly understood. Here, we examined the response to excess Fe exposure in Arabidopsis wild type and ethylene mutants with a focus on primary root growth and the role of ethylene. We showed that excess Fe arrested primary root growth by decreasing both cell elongation and division, and principally resulteds from direct external Fe contact at the root tip. Pronounced ethylene, but not abscisic acid, evolution was associated with excess Fe exposure. Ethylene antagonists intensified root growth inhibition in the wild type, while the inhibition was significantly reduced in ethylene-overproduction mutants. We showed that ethylene plays a positive role in tissue Fe homeostasis, even in the absence of iron-plaque formation. Ethylene reduced Fe concentrations in the stele, xylem, and shoot. Furthermore, ethylene increased the expression of genes encoding Fe-sequestering ferritins. Additionally, ethylene significantly enhanced root K+ status and upregulated K+-transporter (HAK5) expression. Our findings highlight the important role of ethylene in tissue Fe and K homeostasis and primary root growth under Fe stress in Arabidopsis.

Introduction

Iron (Fe) is an essential element for plants, but excessive presence of this element in soils and subsequent toxicity is common, especially in acidic and water-logged soils (Connolly and Guerinot, 2002). Yield reductions of 10–100% have been reported in the case of the world’s leading crop species, rice, and indeed Fe toxicity is considered one of the most formidable research and management challenges in rice cultivation (Becker and Asch, 2005). It has also been recorded in other important crops such as wheat (Khabaz-Saberi et al., 2010, 2012). Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying Fe toxicity remains sparse but is essential in confronting this significant agronomic problem.

The primary mechanisms underlying Fe toxicity in plants remain poorly described. It is well established that of the two oxidation-state species of Fe, Fe2+ and Fe3+, the former is more persistent in acidic soils, most readily absorbed by plants roots, and most detrimental to plant metabolism on account of its influence on redox chemistry. The key chemical reactions proceeding intracellularly, and leading to oxidative tissue damage, are known as the Fenton reactions, which proceed in two steps, each leading to the production of strong oxidants, and, in turn, setting the stage for ‘run-away’ oxidative chain reactions:

Fe2++H2O2Fe3++HO+OH
Fe3++H2O2Fe2++HOO+H+

Accumulation of excess free Fe2+ in tissues must thus be prevented. Several strategies to minimize free Fe2+ build-up in plants have been proposed, such as the exclusion of Fe2+ at the root level, by oxidation and formation of ‘iron plaques’ in the rhizosphere, ion selectivity at the uptake step (Chen et al., 1980a, b ), sequestration in vacuoles and the apoplast, occlusion in ferritin proteins (Audebert and Sahrawat, 2000; Pich et al., 2001; Majerus et al., 2009), and enzymatic detoxification in the symplast (Majerus et al., 2007b, 2009). Furthermore, a common symptom of Fe toxicity is a general suppression of tissue cation levels, such as those of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ (Becker and Asch, 2005; Çelik et al., 2010). Therefore, maintenance of tissue Fe2+ and other vital cations must be considered key to tolerance to Fe toxicity.

Several studies have linked the stress hormone ethylene to Fe toxicity (Peng and Yamauchi, 1993; Becker and Asch, 2005; Majerus et al., 2007a ). Ethylene production has been shown to increase under excess Fe (Peng and Yamauchi, 1993; Yamauchi and Peng, 1995). In rice, increased ethylene production has been linked to differential Fe tolerance of various cultivars, and, more specifically, to iron-plaque formation on the root surface in connection with ethylene-induced aerenchyma differentiation (Majerus et al., 2007a ; Harahap et al., 2014). In addition, there is also evidence suggesting that abscisic acid (ABA) may play a role in Fe tolerance (Majerus et al., 2009). As with ethylene, abscisic acid concentrations have been shown to increase in rice upon exposure to excess iron, and application of an inhibitor of ABA biosynthesis (fluridone, FLU) led to increased iron concentrations in the shoot (Majerus et al., 2009). However, the detailed characteristics and more specific mechanisms of ethylene and ABA responses under Fe stress remain largely unclear.

Increasing evidence points to the importance of ethylene in promoting growth, particularly in the response to abiotic stresses (Pierik et al., 2006). Recent studies have demonstrated that ethylene plays an important role in regulating root growth tolerance to selenite and sodium stresses (Cao et al., 2007; Lehotai et al., 2012). Similarly, ABA plays an important role in regulating root growth (Xu et al., 2013). For instance, increased accumulation of ABA is required for maintaining primary root growth during aluminium (Al) exposure (Hou et al., 2010). Inhibition of primary root growth is one of the earliest symptoms exhibited in response to excess Fe levels (Yoshida, 1981; Becker and Asch, 2005; Fageria et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2011, 2012). Yamauchi and Peng (1995) reported root-growth retardation and a reduction and shortening of roots under Fe exposure. Root growth decreased with increasing external Fe concentration (Li et al., 2012). Zhang et al. (2011, 2012) proposed that the root tip maybe the main action site for Fe resistance. In addition, it has been shown that the application of potassium (K) can ameliorate Fe-inhibited root growth (Li et al., 2001). Although ethylene and ABA signals have been implicated as important for root growth, it is not known how ethylene and ABA are involved in the response of primary root growth to Fe stress.

In this study, we employed Arabidopsis wild type (WT) and ABA- and ethylene-sensitive mutants, to explore the primary root growth response to Fe toxicity, and to elucidate the roles of ethylene and ABA. Potential mechanisms involved in the stress response to Fe are discussed.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Seedlings of the following lines were used in this study: Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0); the mutants eto1-1 (At3g51770), ctr1-1 (At5g03730), aba3-1 (At1g16540), aba2-3 (At1g52340), abi1-1 (At4g26080), eto2-1 (At5g65800), etr1-3 (At1g66340), and eto1-1/etr1-3 in the Col-0 background, and the transgenic lines CycB1::GUS (Colon-Carmona et al., 1999), QC25::GUS (Sabatini et al., 2003), and AtACS7::GUS (Wang et al., 2005). Seeds were surface sterilized and cold treated at 4 °C for 48h before being sown on standard growth medium. The standard growth medium has been described previously (Li et al., 2010) and was composed of 2mM KH2PO4, 5mM NaNO3, 2mM MgSO4, 1mM CaCl2, 50 μM Fe-EDTA, 50 μM H3BO3, 12 μM MnSO4, 1 μM ZnC12, 1 μM CuSO4, 0.2 μM Na2MoO4, 1% sucrose, 0.5g l–1 MES, and 0.8% agar (adjusted to pH 5.7 with 1M NaOH). The day of sowing was considered as d 0. Seedlings were grown, oriented vertically on the surface of the culture plates in a growth chamber and set to a 16h light/8h dark photoperiod, an irradiance of 100 μmol m−2 s−1, and a temperature of 23±1 °C.

Whole-root and localized-root supply of Fe-EDTA to the primary root

Root Fe treatments were applied as follows. Fe was supplied as Fe-EDTA (FeSO4.7H2O plus EDTA, 1:1 molar ratio). The design for whole-root versus supply of Fe-EDTA to only the root tip or the mature zone of the primary root is shown in Fig. 2A, and is briefly described here: segmented agar plates (13×13cm) were separated into upper and bottom parts with a 3mm air gap (Zhang and Forde, 1998) using movable glass strips 3mm in width. Normal growth medium (control medium, pH 5.7) without Fe-EDTA was poured into the upper part, and control medium containing various concentrations of Fe-EDTA was poured into the bottom part. For ‘root-supplied Fe’ plants, the whole root was in contact with the bottom medium after seedling transfer. Plates on which only the primary root tip of the seedlings (~2mm) was in contact with the bottom of the medium are referred to as ‘root-tip-supplied Fe’ plants. In order to perform localized applications of nutrients to the mature zone of the primary root, the segmented plates were separated into three parts: upper, middle, and bottom. The medium containing Fe-EDTA was only poured into the middle part of the plates. For the mature root zone treated with Fe-EDTA, 6-d-old seedlings (with primary roots long enough to cross the middle agar region) were transferred, while others were 5-d-old seedlings, and the treatment length was all 5 d. To study the effect of ethylene precursor or inhibitors and ABA or ABA inhibitor, the bottom medium was supplemented with various concentrations of Fe-EDTA plus the indicated concentrations of ABA, FLU, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), or amino-oxyacetic acid (AOA). All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. To study the effect of K+ on root elongation, the bottom medium only was supplied with various concentrations of K+.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of excess Fe on cell elongation and cell division of primary root tips. (A) Schematic diagram of experimental setup for applying whole-root and localized excess Fe treatments to Arabidopsis roots. White sections indicate the basal growth medium without Fe and grey areas indicate the Fe-enriched medium. (B) Effect of applying serial concentrations of Fe to different parts of the primary root on primary root growth; 100% corresponds to 5.2±0.17cm in the root-supplied Fe treatment, 5.1±0.12cm in the root-tip-supplied Fe treatment, and 6.1±0.13cm in the mature-zone-supplied Fe treatment. The values represent the means±SE of five or more plants. (C) Root elongation and meristem zone sizes in 5-d-old Arabidopsis seedlings treated with different Fe concentrations for 5 d. Bars represent means±SE of 10 or more plants. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 ([one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan post-hoc test]. (D) Comparison of the effect of Fe on the final cell length in primary roots in the root-supplied Fe treatment (5 d). Values represent means±SE of more than 80 cells from no fewer than seven independent plants. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 level (one-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan post-hoc test). (E) Effect of temporal root-supplied excess Fe on the expression of CycB1::GUS and QC25::GUS, after staining for 16h. One representative sample for each experiment is shown. Bars, 50 μm.

Because Fe availability and toxicity are strongly pH dependent (Becker and Asch, 2005), and the pH dependence of root growth itself (Koyama et al., 2001; Kinraide, 2003; Yang et al., 2005) must be controlled for, we also conducted a separate analysis of Arabidopsis primary root growth on a pH gradient both with and without excess Fe. Based on preliminary results showing no effect on root elongation in no-Fe controls, but a significant inhibition in Fe treatments at pH 5.3 (see Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online), we selected this pH in further examinations (established in the agar plate bottom parts).

Measurement of root length, lateral root number, and chlorophyll content

Roots on the agar surface were sampled. The lengths of primary roots of individual seedlings were measured directly with ImageJ software from digital images captured with a Canon G7 camera. Primary root elongation was defined as the length of the root parts newly grown after treatment. The number of mature lateral roots was counted under a dissecting microscope after an additional 5 d of growth. Chlorophyll content was assayed according to the method of Wintermans and de Mots (1965).

Microscopic analysis of cell development in roots

Histochemical analysis of β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter enzyme activity was performed according to the procedure by Weigel and Glazebrook (2002). The length, area, and intensity of the GUS-stained zone were analysed using ImageJ software from digital images captured with a Canon G7 camera. Roots were mounted directly in double-distilled water to avoid cell shrinkage (Li et al., 2010). Measurements were made of the length from the first elongated cell to the first root hair, the meristem length from the quiescent centre (QC) to the first elongated cell, and the final cell length as indicated by the cortex cell length at the mature zone on newly grown parts of the primary root. All images were obtained using an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics and an Olympus DP71 camera. The length of a single cell or tissue in the primary root was analysed with the software Image-Pro Express version 5.1 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Ethylene measurements

After seedling exposure to various concentrations of Fe-EDTA for 4 d, roots were weighed separately and put into 5ml gas-tight vials containing 1ml of agar medium (0.7% agar). Headspace samples (1ml) were withdrawn and analysed using a GC-6850 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Japan), which was equipped with a flame ionization detector.

In vivo staining of ferric and ferrous Fe

For localization of ferric Fe (Fe3+), Arabidopsis roots were rinsed three times with 10mM EDTA and vacuum infiltrated with Perls’ stain solution (equal volumes of 4%, v/v, HCl and 4%, w/v, potassium ferrocyanide) (Stacey et al., 2008) for 15min. Samples were incubated for another 15min in the stain solution and rinsed three times with water. Localization of ferrous Fe (Fe2+) was analysed as described by Engel et al. (2012). Briefly, roots were excised, rinsed three times with 10mM EDTA, and then rinsed three times with ultrapure water (18.2 Milli-Q cm–1). The samples were transferred to 5mM 2,2′-bipyridine in 50mM Tris/acetate buffer at pH 5.6 and incubated for durations of 6h under permanent light (300 μmol m–2 s–1) at 30 °C. Localization of Fe2+ and Fe3+ was observed and imaged using an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with DIC optics and an Olympus DP71 camera.

Characterization of root plaques by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX)

Five-day-old WT and eto1-1 seedlings were transferred to control or excess Fe medium with or without AVG for an additional 5 d of growth. Roots were washed gently with deionzied water three times, and the materials formed were observed on drying roots by SEM (Hitachi S4200, operated at 15kV). The elemental composition of the materials on the roots was examined by EDX attached to the SEM, according to the method of Mi et al. (2013).

Mineral analysis

Five-day-old WT and eto1-1 seedlings were transferred to control or excess Fe medium with or without AVG for an additional 5 d of growth and then harvested. For mineral analyses, the roots and shoots of the seedlings were dried at 75 °C prior to analysis, and samples were digested with HNO3 and subjected to inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (IRIS Advantage, Thermo Electron, USA).

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis

qRT-PCR was carried out according to the method of Li et al. (2013). Total RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis roots. Gene sequences were available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information, and gene-specific primers for qRT-PCR were designed and identified using Primer 5 software and ordinary PCR, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S11A and Table S1 at JXB online). CBP20 (nuclear-encoded cap-binding protein) was used as the housekeeping gene, and relative RNA abundance was normalized to the CBP20 internal control ([mRNA]gene/[mRNA]CBP20).

Statistical and graphical analyses

For all experiments, data were statistically analysed using the SPSS 13.0 program (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA.). Details are as presented in the figure legends. Graphs were produced using Origin 8.0. All graphs and images were prepared using Adobe Photoshop 7.0.

Results

Root-tip contact with excess Fe is essential for inhibition of Arabidopsis primary root growth

To analyse the effect of Fe toxicity on primary root growth in 5 d treatments, Arabidopsis roots were allowed to come into contact with varying concentrations of Fe-EDTA. Root-supplied Fe from 0 to 50 μM did not significantly affect primary root growth. However, at Fe concentrations at and above 100 μM, elongation was potently inhibited, and the degree of inhibition was positively dependent on Fe concentration (Fig. 1). By contrast, lateral root number and chlorophyll content were more resistant to higher Fe concentrations (Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). At 50 μM Fe, seedlings showed maximum primary root growth (Fig. 1) coupled to green leaves and healthy growth overall (Supplementary Fig. S2). Therefore, 50 μM Fe was used as the control in further experiments.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Inhibitory effect on the growth of primary root in Arabidopsis (Col-0) when roots are supplied with Fe-EDTA. (A) Photograph of representative seedlings after 5 d of vertical growth on varying Fe concentrations. The filled circle indicates the positions of primary root tips at the time of transfer to different treatment media. Bar, 1cm. (B) Primary root growth of 5-d-old WT exposed to serial concentrations of Fe-EDTA for 5 d. Data represent means of eight or more plants±standard error (SE).

Given the strong impact of excess Fe exposure on primary root growth, we proceeded to determine if this was a localized or systemic response. We first tested the growth response of primary roots to localized Fe supply (Fig. 2A), and found that the inhibitory effect was identical whether Fe was applied to the whole root or only the tip (Fig. 2B). In a further experiment, no growth inhibition occurred when the root body was in contact with Fe but the root tip did not touch the Fe-containing medium, even when Fe concentration was raised to 500 μM (Fig. 2B). These observations demonstrated a highly localized response to excess Fe in the inhibition of root growth phenotype.

We further observed that the root-elongation zone was markedly reduced in response to excess Fe treatment compared with the control (for example, 68% reduction at 350 μM Fe) (Fig. 2C), indicating either a reduced capacity for cell expansion in the elongation zone and/or reduced cell division in the meristem. To address these two possibilities, we first examined the length of differentiated cells just above the elongation zone, representing root-cell expansion (Li et al., 2010). The average length of differentiated cells in seedlings subjected to excess Fe showed dose-dependent inhibition (Fig. 2D). The capacity for cell division in the root apex was then measured. Meristem length was reduced at and above 150 μM Fe, and decreased linearly as medium Fe concentration increased further (Fig. 2C). The CycB1::GUS reporter was further used to monitor cell-cycle activity, specifically the G2-to-M transition during the cell cycle (Colon-Carmona et al., 1999). Even though root-supplied Fe had no significant effect on the intensity of expression of CycB1::GUS in the root meristem compared with the control (Fig. 2E and Supplementary Fig. S5C at JXB online), analysis of the extent and area of the GUS-stained region of the root tip indicated that the mitotically active zone was significantly reduced (P<0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S5A, B). We further examined the expression of QC25, an established QC marker. Interestingly, compared with the control, expression of QC25::GUS in the root tip under excess Fe was slightly increased (P<0.05) (Fig. 2E and Supplementary Fig. S5D).

ABA-mediated signalling is not required for the inhibitory action of Fe on primary root growth

ABA plays an important role in regulating root growth under stress (Xu et al., 2013), including under high-Fe exposure (Majerus et al., 2009), and thus had to be examined here. Specifically, the involvement of ABA in the regulation of primary root growth under excess Fe has not been investigated. For this purpose, the effects of ABA and FLU, an inhibitor of ABA biosynthesis, on primary root growth under conditions under both control and excess Fe conditions were examined. However, neither ABA nor FLU affected the inhibition of primary root growth by excess Fe significantly (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, ABA mutants, including abi1-1 (ABA-insensitive), aba3-1, and aba2-3 (ABA-deficient), were used to test whether inhibition of primary root growth under Fe stress involved ABA mediation. The mutants and WT seedlings were exposed to varying concentrations of Fe continuously for 5 d and the lengths of newly grown roots were analysed statistically (Fig. 3B). Fe had a similar impact on inhibition of root growth in abi1-1, aba3-1, aba2-3, and WT plants.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

ABA-mediated signalling is not required for the inhibitory action of Fe on primary root growth. Five-day-old WT, abi1-1, aba3-1, and aba2-3 seedlings were transferred to medium, and roots were supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 3 μM ABA or 0.1 μM FLU for 5 d, after which primary root growth was quantified. (A) Effect of ABA or FLU on primary root growth in WT seedlings when roots are supplied with excess Fe. Values are means±SE (n≥6). (B) Effect of varying concentrations of Fe on primary root growth in WT and ABA mutant seedlings. Values are means±SE (n≥5). Primary root growth in WT, abi1-1, aba3-1, and aba2-3 in the control were 5.2±0.1, 4.66±0.14, 3.92±0.2, and 4.3±0.12cm, respectively.

Excess Fe-induced root ethylene accumulation contributes to primary root-growth tolerance

To elucidate the relationship between ethylene accumulation and Fe tolerance of root growth, we first measured ethylene production under Fe stress by use of gas chromatography. Excess Fe significantly increased ethylene levels in roots (Fig. 4A). As ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) are pivotal enzymes in the ethylene biosynthetic pathway of plants, to detect whether the observed induction of ethylene production by excess Fe was due to regulation of expression of the genes encoding ACS and ACO in roots, four genes for ACS, AtACS2, AtACS7, AtACS8, and AtACS11, and two for ACO, AtACO1and AtACO2, were examined, using qRT-PCR. All ACS genes responded with increased transcript abundance following 6h treatment with excess Fe, and expression of AtACO1 and AtACO2 was also rapidly upregulated in response to excess Fe after 6h (Fig. 4B). The expression levels of AtACS7::GUS, in which the GUS reporter gene is driven by an AtACS7 promoter, were also tested, and excess Fe induced a marked increase of AtACS7::GUS expression from the meristematic to the mature zone of roots, compared with the control (Fig. 4C). We also analysed the expression of the ethylene reporter EBS::GUS (an ethylene reporter construct in which the GUS reporter gene is driven by a synthetic EIN3-responsive promoter) in the root (Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online). On excess Fe-treated medium, EBS::GUS expression was enhanced markedly from the elongation zone to the mature zone of the roots, compared with that of the control (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of excess Fe on ethylene response in WT Arabidopsis seedlings. (A) Ethylene evolution in Arabidopsis root. Seedlings at 4 d after germination were exposed to 350 μM in the roots for 4 d, and ethylene evolution was determined. Values are means±SE of three replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical differences between control (Ctrl) and excess Fe treatment (+Fe) conditions (independent samples t-test, *P<0.05). (B) Effect of excess Fe on expression of root ACS and ACO. Expression of root ACS and ACO were determined by quantitative real-time PCR after exposure of 5-d-old WT seedlings to 350 μM Fe for 6h. Values are means±SE of three replicates. (C) Activity of AtACS7::GUS in Arabidopsis root tissue. Seedlings at 5 d after germination were exposed to 350 μM Fe in the roots for 2 d, and then ACS7::GUS activity was determined. One representative sample from each treatment (seven plants) is shown. (a) Primary root apex; (b) stele of primary root. Ctrl, control. Bars, 50 μm.

To investigate the possible role of ethylene in Fe-induced inhibition of primary root growth, we investigated the effects of ACC (an ethylene precursor), AVG, and AOA (inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis) on primary root growth under conditions of both control and excess Fe. Supplementation with ACC effectively reversed the decreased rate of primary root growth seen under excess Fe, compared with the mock condition (36.2 and 59.3% inhibition, respectively; Fig. 5A). However, AVG and AOA aggravated the Fe-induced inhibition of primary root growth (Fig. 5A, B). A genetic approach was further adopted, using an ethylene-overproduction mutant eto1-1 (Alonso and Stepanova, 2004). Exposure of the eto1-1 mutant to varying Fe concentrations led to less inhibition of root growth than in WT, with elongation being reduced by ~60 and ~35% in WT and eto1-1 plants, respectively, upon exposure to 350 μM Fe (Fig. 5C). We next determined if other mutations conferring increased ethylene levels also led to increased primary root growth tolerance to excess Fe and if application of the ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor AVG would suppress eto1-1 mutant root growth tolerant phenotypes. We found that eto2-1, a gain-of-function ACS5 mutant allele of ETO2, which confers increased ethylene production (Wang et al., 2004), also displayed increased root-growth tolerance compared with WT (Fig. 5C). Meanwhile, supplementation with AVG prevented root growth tolerance in association with elevated ethylene levels in eto1-1 seedlings exposed to excess Fe (Supplementary Fig. S4 at JXB online).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Enhanced ethylene evolution contributes to primary root growth tolerance to excess Fe. Five-day-old WT, eto1-1, eto2-1, etr1-3, ctr1-1, and eto1-1etr1-3 seedlings were transferred to medium, and roots were supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 0.2 μM ACC, 1 μM AVG,or 50 μM AOA for 5 d, after which primary root growth was quantified. (A) Effect of root-supplied ethylene precursor (ACC) or inhibitors (AVG and AOA) on primary root growth of WT Arabidopsis seedlings grown in 350 μM Fe treatment medium. Values are means±SE (n≥ 6). Asterisks indicate statistical differences between the mock and treatment under excess Fe condition (independent samples t-test, *P<0.05). (B) Photograph of representative seedlings after 5 d of vertical growth in medium with roots supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG. Filled circles indicate the positions of primary root tips at the time of transfer to different treatment media. Bars, 1cm. (C) Effect of excess Fe on primary root growth in WT and ethylene-overproducing mutants eto1-1 and eto2-1. Data are from one of three experiments. Values are means±SE (n≥5). Asterisks indicate statistical differences between the WT and mutants in the same growth conditions (independent samples t-test, *P<0.05). Primary root growth in WT, eto1-1, and eto2-1 in the control were 5.2±0.24, 2.97±0.2, and 3.14±0.28cm, respectively. (D) Relative root growth of WT, eto1-1, etr1-3, ctr1-1, and eto1-1etr1-3 seedlings on excess Fe treatment compared with the control. Values are the means±SE (n=5). Asterisks indicate statistical differences between the WT and mutants under excess Fe condition (independent samples t-test, *P<0.05). Primary root growth in WT, eto1-1, etr1-3, ctr1-1, and eto1-1etr1-3 in control were 5.14±0.32, 2.48±0.3, 5.0±0.12, 2.34±0.15, and 5.1±0.21cm, respectively.

As ethylene is known to activate downstream signalling pathways by binding to ethylene receptors (e.g. ETR1), we examined whether ethylene regulates primary root growth tolerance to Fe in such a way. Root growth in the ethylene-insensitive (ethylene-receptor) mutant etr1-3 was only slightly sensitive to excess Fe compared with WT seedlings; consistent with this, the constitutive ethylene signalling mutant ctr1-1 (a negative regulator of the ETR1-regulated ethylene signalling pathway) displayed increased root-growth tolerance (Fig. 5D). In further experiments with the double mutant line eto1-1/etr1-3, we found that etr1-3 suppressed the root-elongation tolerance (Fig. 5D) characteristic of eto1-1.

Inhibiting ethylene production leads to reduction of both cell elongation and cell division in roots exposed to excess Fe

Given that excess Fe markedly inhibited root-tip cell elongation and cell division (Fig. 2), we asked whether endogenous ethylene levels in Fe-treated plants were related to cell elongation and cell division in root tips exposed to excess Fe. Exogenous AVG and AOA application had almost no effect on the length of the elongation and meristematic zones in the control (50 μM Fe), whereas they strongly reduced the length of both zones in the presence of excess Fe (350 μM Fe) (Fig. 6A). We then examined the length of differentiated cells just above the elongation zone. AVG and AOA application significantly reduced final cell length under excess Fe (50.5 and 52% inhibition, respectively) but had no effect in control roots (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, CycB1::GUS analysis showed that excess Fe in combination with AVG had no significant effect on the intensity of expression of CycB1::GUS in the root meristem compared with the control (P<0.05) (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Fig. S5C), but the extent and area of the GUS-stained region was reduced more than in the Fe/–AVG treatment (~57% reduction in combination vs ~33% alone of stained zone length, respectively) (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Fig. S5A, B). However, AVG application had little effect on the expression of QC25::GUS under excess Fe treatment (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Fig. S5D).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Effect of ethylene inhibitors on cell elongation and cell division of primary root tips under excess Fe treatment. Five-day-old WT seedlings were transferred to medium, and roots were supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG or 50 μM AOA for 5 d, after which the data were analysed. (A) Root elongation and meristem zone sizes of 5-d-old Arabidopsis seedlings treated with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG or 50 μM AOA for 5 d. Bars represent means±SE of nine or more plants. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan post-hoc test). (B) Comparison of the effect of ethylene inhibitors on the final cell length in primary roots in the root-supplied Fe treatment (5 d). Values represent the means±SE of more than 80 cells from no fewer than seven independent plants. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan post-hoc test). (C) Effect of ethylene inhibitors on the expression of CycB1::GUS and QC25::GUS after staining for 16h. One representative sample for each experiment is shown. Bars, 50 μm.

Ethylene plays a role in modulating tissue Fe homeostasis under Fe stress, even without iron-plaque induction

To understand the function of iron-plaque formation under Fe stress in the context of primary root growth, we studied root-surface iron plaques in WT and mutant (eto1-1) using an optical microscope and SEM/EDX. SEM/EDX analysis showed that the weight percentage of Fe at the root surface was slightly altered in response to excess Fe treatment in both WT and mutant (Supplementary Fig. S6A at JXB online). However, under the Fe treatments used, the root surface of Arabidopsis WT and mutant showed no obvious (orange) plaques (Supplementary Fig. S6B).

To examine whether and how ethylene regulates Fe accumulation and homeostasis in excess Fe-treated seedlings in absence of iron plaques, we first investigated the Fe content in root and shoot of seedlings grown in vitro, under control (50 μM Fe) and excess Fe (350 μM Fe) conditions, using ICP-AES. Fe content in both WT and eto1-1 seedlings increased rapidly when exposed to excess Fe conditions, but Fe accumulation in WT seedlings, especially in shoots, was significantly greater than in eto1-1 seedlings when cultivated under excess Fe (Fig. 7A). Under excess Fe, WT shoots and roots contained ~68 and ~14% more Fe than eto1-1 mutants, respectively. Moreover, Fe content in excess Fe- and Fe+AVG-treated plants revealed that inhibiting ethylene production by AVG further increased the Fe content in WT, increasing by ~22 and ~11%, in shoot and root, respectively (Fig. 7A).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Effect of ethylene on tissue Fe homeostasis in excess Fe-treated seedlings. (A) Effect of ethylene on Fe contents in shoots and roots of Arabidopsis WT and eto1-1 seedlings in root medium supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG for 5 d. Values are the means±SE of three replicates. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan post-hoc test). DW, dry weight. (B) Effect of ethylene on free Fe2+ concentrations in roots and stems of Arabidopsis WT and eto1-1 seedlings in root medium supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG for 4 d. Localization of ferrous Fe was analysed by 2,2′-bipyridine staining as described by Engel et al. (2012). Bars, 50 μm. (C) Expression of FER1, FER2, FER3, and FER4 in roots of WT and eto1-1 seedlings. Expression of FER1, FER2, FER3, and FER4 were determined by quantitative real-time PCR after exposure of 5-d-old WT and eto1-1 seedlings to 350 μM Fe for 6h. The relative mRNA level was normalized to CBP20 expression. Values are means±SE of three replicates.

Free Fe2+ is the principal toxicity component under excess Fe toxicity (Becker and Asch, 2005). To determine whether ethylene modulates Arabidopsis tolerance by regulating root and stem free Fe2+ concentrations, we examined free Fe2+ concentrations in root and stem by staining in a mutant in the presence of an ethylene inhibitor. Fe2+ concentrations in both WT and eto1-1 increased in roots and stem under excess Fe, especially in the vascular tissue and xylem (Fig. 7B), but much less so in the eto1-1 mutant (Fig. 7B). Moreover, supplementation with AVG markedly increased free Fe2+ concentrations in Fe-treated WT compared with Fe treatment alone (Fig. 7B). In addition, we also utilized Perls’ stain to localize free Fe3+ in Fe-alone and Fe/+AVG-treated WT roots. Increased staining was observed in the roots of Fe-treated plants, and supplementation with AVG markedly increased the staining (Supplementary Fig. S7 at JXB online). Interestingly, we found that eto1-1 seedlings showed slightly more pronounced Fe3+ staining than WT grown under excess Fe alone (Supplementary Fig. S7).

The expression of genes encoding ferritin (FER1, FER2, FER3, and FER4; Petit et al., 2001) was also analysed by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 7C, expression of ferritin genes was stimulated in both WT and eto1-1, and the induction of ferritin genes was significantly higher in eto1-1 than in the WT under excess Fe. Similar to a previous report (Petit et al., 2001), Arabidopsis FER1 and FER3 (especially FER1) were the two major ferritin genes expressed in roots in response to excess Fe (Fig. 7C).

Ethylene is related to root K accumulation in Fe-treated seedlings

Mineral content was also analysed in seedlings grown on control and excess Fe medium. ICP-AES analysis showed little difference in tissue mineral concentrations, including zinc, calcium, magnesium and manganese, between WT and eto1-1 in response to excess Fe (Supplementary Fig. S8 at JXB online). However, a significant increase in root potassium (K) content was observed in eto1-1 plants compared with WT (~30%). These differences were not observed in shoots (Fig. 8A). Furthermore, K content in shoots and roots of Fe- and Fe/+AVG-treated WT seedlings was determined. Supplementation with AVG reduced root, but not shoot, K content in Fe-treated seedlings, by ~20% (Fig. 8A). We further investigated the function of K in root growth under Fe stress. Primary root-growth suppression under excess Fe was alleviated by K+ addition (Supplementary Fig. S9 at JXB online), and eto1-1 primary root growth appeared to be more tolerant to excess Fe under low K than WT (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Effect of ethylene on tissue potassium (K) homeostasis in excess Fe-treated seedlings. (A) The effect of ethylene on K contents in shoots and roots of Arabidopsis WT and eto1-1 seedlings in root medium supplemented with 350 μM Fe alone or in combination with 1 μM AVG for 5 d. Values are means±SE of three replicates. Different letters represent statistically different means at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan post-hoc test). DW, dry weight. (B) Expression of HAK5 and AKT1 in roots of WT and eto1-1 seedlings. Expression of HAK5 and AKT1 was determined by quantitative real-time PCR after exposure of 5-d-old WT and eto1-1 seedlings to 350 μM Fe for 6h. The relative mRNA level was normalized to CBP20 expression. Values are means±SE of three replicates.

The expression of two principal K+ transporter encoding genes, HAK5 and AKT1, coding for root plasma membrane-resident high- and low-affinity K+ transporters, respectively (Szczerba et al., 2009), in response to excess Fe was examined. HAK5 expression was induced by excess Fe in both WT and eto1-1 roots, but was ~6-fold more pronounced in eto1-1 (Fig. 8B). In contrast to HAK5, transcript levels of AKT1 were generally unresponsive to excess Fe treatment (Fig. 8B). The eto2-1 mutant also displayed higher HAK5 expression levels than WT in response to excess Fe (Supplementary Fig. S10 at JXB online).

Discussion

Fe is both an essential micronutrient and is highly toxic when in excess, and inhibition of primary root growth is one of the chief symptoms of this toxicity (Becker and Asch, 2005; Fageria et al., 2008). However, the mechanism underpinning this remains largely unknown. In the present study, we showed that excess Fe supplied to roots in Arabidopsis impacts both cell elongation and division, and this inhibition requires the root tip to be in direct contact with external excess Fe. We found that ethylene, but not ABA, is required for primary root tolerance to Fe toxicity. We further showed that ethylene can effectively regulate tissue Fe accumulation, even in the absence of iron-plaque formation. Our data revealed that ethylene supports tolerance to Fe by reducing free Fe2+ in the roots, stele, and xylem, and total Fe content in shoots. Additionally, ethylene also alleviates Fe-induced root K+ depletion. Thus, ethylene alleviates Fe’s inhibitory effect on Arabidopsis root growth by targeting tissue Fe and K+ homeostasis, not necessitating the induction of iron plaques.

We showed that the impact of Fe on root growth in Arabidopsis is not a systemic response. Split-plate results reported here provided a strong demonstration that physical contact of the primary root tip with Fe is necessary, and sufficient, for primary root inhibition (Fig. 2A, B), supporting the proposal that the root tip is the principal action site for Fe toxicity and resistance (Zhang et al., 2011, 2012). Upon root-tip contact with excess Fe, we observed that cell elongation was suppressed dramatically, with cell division being reduced to a much lesser extent (Fig. 2CE). From these observations, we conclude that root-supplied excess Fe arrests root growth primarily via decreasing cell elongation and division, and mainly results from the direct effects of external excess Fe upon the root tip. This is similar to what was observed under NH4 + toxicity, where root-tip contact was both essential and sufficient to effect NH4 + toxicity (Li et al., 2010). In agreement with previous results, Fe deficiency significantly decreased Arabidopsis lateral root development, and increasing Fe supply improved lateral root number (Giehl et al., 2012; Gruber et al., 2013; Supplementary Fig. S2A), although a negative effect at 500 μM Fe was seen in the present study. The decrease in the lateral root number at 500 μM Fe possibly reflects the shorter length of the primary root, considering lateral root number is usually linked to primary root growth (Dubrovsky and Forde, 2012).

The present data indicated an enhanced ethylene evolution upon exposure of seedlings to excess Fe (Fig. 4A, B). Similar results have been reported in rice (Peng and Yamauchi, 1993; Majerus et al., 2007b ). However, unlike these previous studies, we here identified that expression of the genes encoding ACS and ACO, the two key enzymes responsible for ethylene synthesis, were transcriptionally upregulated by excess Fe (Fig. 4B, C). The enhanced expression of these genes was correlated with the observed Fe-induced ethylene production (Fig. 4A). To establish the links between Fe-induced ethylene production in roots and Fe-dependent root growth, both pharmacological and genetic approaches were employed. Remarkably, the excess Fe induced inhibition of primary root growth was alleviated in the presence of ACC, a precursor of ethylene, but inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis (AVG and AOA; Peng and Yamauchi, 1993) aggravated the Fe-induced inhibition of root growth (Fig. 5A, B). The finding that mutants exhibiting ethylene-overproduction (eto1-1 and eto2-1) showed increased root growth compared with WT under Fe stress (Fig. 5C) supports this notion. The observation that the externally root-supplied ethylene inhibitor AVG prevented the tolerance by elevated ethylene levels in eto1-1 exposed to high Fe (Supplementary Fig. S4) further demonstrates the important role of ethylene for root growth under Fe stress. More specially, we found that ethylene inhibitors proved to significantly aggravate the Fe-induced inhibition of cell elongation and cell division (Fig. 6), consistent with the above-described root growth-suppressive phenotype induced by Fe (Fig. 2CE). Based on these findings, excess Fe can inhibit root growth by reducing both cell elongation and division, and this inhibitory role is alleviated partially by ethylene. Our observations that etr1-3 suppresses the root-growth tolerance characteristic of eto1-1, and inhibition of root growth in the constitutive ethylene signalling mutant ctr1-1 in response to excess Fe was more than in WT (Fig. 5D), highlight the important roles the ETR1-CTR1-dependent ethylene signalling pathway play in Fe-dependent primary root growth.

There is ample evidence that formation of iron plaques on rice roots provides a physical barrier for influx of reduced iron, i.e. serves as an exclusion mechanism; meanwhile, ethylene is known to stimulate plaque formation (Becker and Asch, 2005; Majerus et al., 2007a ; Harahap et al., 2014). Thus, the possible role of iron plaque in ethylene-regulated Arabidopsis root growth in response to Fe toxicity was investigated in our study. However, we did not find a significant influence of excess Fe on visible iron-plaque formation in Arabidopsis WT or eto1-1 in this study (Supplementary Fig. S6). The form of Fe supply may be a potential explanation for the absence of visible iron plaques. In the present study, we supplied Fe in the form of Fe-EDTA based on the previous report that Fe-EDTA could maintain sufficient Fe stress over several days (Elec et al., 2013), and Fe-EDTA as an Fe source has been reported not to form visible iron plaques as readily (Taylor et al., 1984). Alternatively, no visible formation of iron plaques may in part also be the result of root washing inherent in the experimental protocols. However, roots were washed gently with deionized water in this study, and it has been reported that only the application of dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB) thoroughly removes iron plaques (McLaughlin et al., 1985). One previous report showed that, for root surfaces without iron plaques, Fe was difficult to detect by SEM-EDX at the surface, although the total Fe content (DCB-extracted) was high in roots (Mi et al., 2013), similar to the present SEM-EDX result (Supplementary Fig. S6A). Furthermore, deionized water washing could remove Fe adhering to the root surface (McLaughlin et al., 1985), while SEM-EDX most effectively images root epidermal cells.

We furthermore observed over this time period, i.e. in the absence of plaque formation, that ethylene decreased Fe accumulation in roots (Fig. 7A). It is not known as this time whether ethylene can directly modulate root Fe influx and/or efflux, and more research is warranted to examine this. However, resistance to Fe toxicity is associated not just with tissue total Fe content but also with tissue free Fe2+ content. The accumulation of free Fe2+ in tissues is widely considered to be critical to the tolerance of Fe toxicity (Becker and Asch, 2005; Engel et al., 2012). Under Fe toxicity, excess Fe-induced ethylene clearly decreased root- and stem-xylem Fe2+ levels (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, homeostatic regulation of shoot iron levels is necessary, and excess iron in shoots is considered to be the leading cause of whole-plant toxicity (Audebert and Sahrawat, 2000; Fageria et al., 2008). In the present study employing both ethylene mutants and inhibitors, we showed that ethylene significantly decreased Fe accumulation in shoots (Fig. 7A). Although the mechanism by which endogenous ethylene regulates free Fe2+ and shoot Fe content under excess Fe remains to be defined, our hypothesis was that ethylene influences ferritin (FER) gene expression in roots (Fig. 7C). FER1 and FER3 are the two major ferritin genes expressed in Arabidopsis roots in response to excess Fe (Petit et al., 2001; Fig. 7C), and iron homeostasis depends critically on these, with ferritin being able to sequester thousands of Fe2+ ions per molecule (Connolly and Guerinot, 2002), and these are, thus, critical in regulating tissue free Fe2+ concentration (Majerus et al., 2007a, 2009) and in protecting roots against Fe-mediated oxidative stress (Reyt et al., 2014) and may also affect shoot Fe accumulation as a result of enhanced Fe sequesteration in roots. Furthermore, Fe2+ decreases may occur in association with an alkalinization of apoplastic pH (Kosegarten et al., 2004), which reduces Fe2+ mobility and chemical stability (Becker and Asch, 2005), and has been report to be caused by ethylene (Staal et al., 2011). The (albeit slight) increase in Fe3+ staining in eto1-1 mutant roots supports this possibility (Supplementary Fig. S7). Alternatively, AtFRD3, encoding a protein of the MATE (multidrug and toxin efflux) family responsible for the xylem loading of citrate, a potent Fe chelator, which is required for the correct distribution of Fe throughout the plant tissues (Durrett et al., 2007), may be involved in ethylene-regulated Fe homeostasis under excess Fe condition. However, in the present study, we found that WT and eto1-1 plants displayed similar levels of expression of AtFRD3 under control conditions and that transcript levels were generally unresponsive to excess Fe treatment (Supplementary Fig. S11B). Furthermore, previous observations that FRD3 was expressed weakly in Fe-sufficient roots (Inoue et al., 2004; García et al., 2010) also seem to discount this possibility. An additional mechanism examined here was that of the critical role of maintenance of K+ homesostasis to support root growth under Fe toxicity (Li et al., 2001; Çelik et al., 2010; Supplementary Fig. S8). Mutants with increased ethylene production showed less root K+ depletion under excess Fe and were more tolerant to excess Fe under low K+ (Fig. 8A and Supplementary Fig. S9). The Fe tolerance conferred by elevated ethylene levels and retention of higher root K+ may partially be linked to the elevated levels of transcripts encoding the high-affinity K+ transporter HAK5 (HIGH-AFFINITY K + TRANSPORTER5 (Szczerba et al., 2009), known to be ethylene-responsive (Jiang et al., 2013), observed in the eto1-1 and eto2-1 mutants (Fig. 8B and Supplementary Fig. S10). We speculate that elevated ethylene stimulates HAK5 transcription to maintain root K homeostasis, considered important in controlling tolerance of primary root growth under Fe toxicity (Li et al., 2001; Çelik et al., 2010). Furthermore, a recent study by Reyt et al. (2014) observed that Fe homeostasis interfered with reactive oxygen species distribution in the primary root, and this interaction may contribute to primary root shortening under Fe excess. How precisely reactive oxygen species signalling and the ethylene pathway interact in root-growth acclimation to changes in Fe availability remains to be elucidated.

ABA, another important phytohormone, is often associated with stress, for instance, with Al toxicity (Hou et al., 2010). However, ABA was shown not to be involved in root-growth responses under phosphorus deprivation (Trull et al., 1997). In our study, application of ABA and the ABA-synthesis inhibitor FLU had no significant effect on primary root growth under Fe stress (Fig. 3). Furthermore, WT plants and ABA-deficient or -insensitive mutants showed essentially identical inhibition of primary root growth when exposed to varying concentrations of Fe. Thus, ABA is unlikely to be involved in the primary root inhibition under excess Fe toxicity. However, we currently cannot exclude that ABA may have an impact on other aspects of development in Arabidopsis under Fe toxicity. Al toxicity is another root growth constraint prevalent in acidic soils and often occurs in combination with Fe toxicity (Khabaz-Saberi et al., 2010, 2012). However, in a previous study (Sun et al., 2010), ethylene was reported to negatively impact root growth under Al tolerance. Mechanisms underpinning the differences in ethylene and ABA roles in response to Fe- and Al-mediated inhibition of root growth remain unknown, but might provide important clues to understanding the adaptive strategies of plants to excessive loads of both Fe and Al in acidic soils. Furthermore, moderately acidic pH values (pH >5; pH 5.3 in this study) have been reported to enhance Al rhizotoxicity by affecting plant cell membrane surface charge, as a result of which greater amounts of free Al can accumulate at the root-cell surface (Kobayashi et al., 2013). According to calculations using Geochem-EZ (a multifunctional chemical speciation program; Shaff et al., 2010), while most of the Fe is complexed with EDTA, small amounts of free Fe still exist (data not shown). Such insights gained from studying Al tolerance might offer useful clues to better understanding excess Fe toxicity.

In summary, our results showed that excess Fe contact with the root tip is both necessary and sufficient to the sensing of Fe stress in the root system of Arabidopsis and to the ensuing suppression of primary root growth, and results in a reduction of both cell elongation and cell division. Furthermore, we showed that elevated endogenous ethylene production results from upregulated expression of ACS and ACO genes, rather than ABA, and protects primary root growth under excess Fe toxicity, as demonstrated by aggravation of the inhibitory effect on root growth with ethylene antagonists and lower sensitivity of ethylene-overproduction mutants to excess Fe. Increased ethylene plays a positive role in tissue Fe homeostasis, even in the absence of iron-plaque formation. Ethylene reduces root Fe accumulation, increases the expression of genes encoding Fe-sequestering ferritin and minimizes stelar and xylem Fe2+ concentrations, thereby impacting both shoot Fe accumulation and toxicity within the root. In addition, ethylene positively impacts K+ homeostasis under Fe stress. Our results provide novel insight into how primary root growth is regulated in response to excess Fe stress. Further research into the mechanisms of interplay between excess Fe and ethylene evolution of plants will enable a fuller understanding of how plants respond to excess Fe stress by regulating hormonal signalling, and will be instrumental in the development of strategies to improve Fe toxicity tolerance in crops.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Effect of pH on primary root growth in Arabidopsis (Col-0) when roots are supplied with or without excess Fe.

Supplementary Fig. S2. Effect on lateral root number and chlorophyll content in Arabidopsis when roots are supplied with Fe-EDTA.

Supplementary Fig. S3. Effect of excess Fe on the activity of the EBS::GUS in Arabidopsis root tissue.

Supplementary Fig. S4. Effect of AVG on eto1-1 primary root growth under excess Fe stress.

Supplementary Fig. S5. Effect of excess Fe on the staining of CycB1::GUS and QC25::GUS in medium supplemented with or without AVG.

Supplementary Fig. S6. Analysis of iron plaques on the root surface of Arabidopsis WT and eto1-1 mutants.

Supplementary Fig. S7. Fe3+ staining in roots of Arabidopsis WT and eto1-1 seedlings.

Supplementary Fig. S8. Effect of ethylene on tissue mineral contents in excess Fe-treated seedlings.

Supplementary Fig. S9. Effect of exogenous K+ on primary root growth in WT and eto1-1 seedlings.

Supplementary Fig. S10. The effect of excess Fe treatment on AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 transcript levels in eto2-1 seedlings.

Supplementary Fig. S11. Effect of excess Fe on the expression of the AtFRD3 gene and the specific analysis of primers used for RT-PCR.

Supplementary Table S1. Gene-specific primers used for RT-PCR.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Peter Doener (University of Edinburgh), Ben Scheres (Utrecht University), Dr Guohua Mi (China Agricultural University) and Dr Ningning Wang (Nankai University) for providing the CycB1::GUS, QC25::GUS, and AtACS7::GUS transgenic lines, and the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Centre of Ohio State University for mutant seeds. We also thank Dr Caifu Jiang (China Agricultural University) for providing the eto2-1, etr1-3, and eto1-1/etr1-3 lines. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300210 and 41171234) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, Discovery Grant 217277-2009).

Glossary

Abbreviations:

ABA

abscisic acid

ACC

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

ACO

ACC oxidase

ACS

ACC synthase

Al

aluminium

ANOVA

analysis of variance

AOA

amino-oxyacetic acid

AVG

aminoethoxyvinylglycine

EDX

energy-dispersive X-ray

Fe

iron

FLU

fluridone

ICP-AES

inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy

K

potassium

QC

quiescent centre

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR

SE

standard error

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

WT

wild type.

References

  1. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN. 2004. The ethylene signaling pathway. Science 306, 1513–1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Audebert A, Sahrawat KL. 2000. Mechanisms for iron toxicity tolerance in lowland rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker M, Asch F. 2005. Iron toxicity in rice-conditions and management concepts. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168, 558–573. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cao WH, Liu J, He XJ, Mu RL, Zhou HL, Chen SY, Zhang JS. 2007. Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salt-stress responses. Plant Physiology 143, 707–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Çelik H, Asik BB, Gürel S, Katkat AV. 2010. Potassium as an intensifying factor for iron chlorosis. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen CC, Dixon JB, Turner FT. 1980. a . Iron coatings on rice roots: morphology and models of development. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen CC, Dixon JB, Turner FT. 1980. b . Iron coatings on rice roots: Mineralogy and quantity influencing factors. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 635–639. [Google Scholar]
  8. Colon-Carmona A, You R, Haimovitch-Gal T, Doerner P. 1999. Technical advance: spatio-temporal analysis of mitotic activity with a labile cyclin–GUS fusion protein. The Plant Journal 20, 503–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Connolly EL, Guerinot ML. 2002. Iron stress in plants. Genome Biology 3, 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubrovsky JG, Forde BG. 2012. Quantitative analysis of lateral root development: pitfalls and how to avoid them. Plant Cell 24, 4–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Durrett TP, Gassmann W, Rogers EE. 2007. The FRD3-mediated efflux of citrate into the root vasculature is necessary for efficient iron translocation. Plant Physiology 144, 197–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elec V, Quimio CA, Mendoza R, Sajise GCA, Beebout SEJ, Gregorio GB, Singh RK. 2013. Maintaining elevated Fe2+ concentration in solution culture for the development of a rapid and repeatable screening technique for iron toxicity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 372, 253–264. [Google Scholar]
  13. Engel K, Asch F, Becker M. 2012. In vivo staining of reduced iron by 2,2′ bipyridine in rice exposed to iron toxicity. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 175, 548–552. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fageria NK, Santos AB, Barbosa Filho MP, Guimarães CM. 2008. Iron toxicity in lowland rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31, 1676–1697. [Google Scholar]
  15. García MJ, Lucena C, Romera FJ, Alcántara E, Pérez-Vicente R. 2010. Ethylene and nitric oxide involvement in the up-regulation of key genes related to iron acquisition and homeostasis in Arabidopsis . Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3885–3899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Giehl RFH, Lima JE, von Wirén N. 2012. Localized iron supply triggers lateral root elongation in Arabidopsis by altering the AUX1-mediated auxin distribution. Plant Cell 24, 33–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gruber BD, Giehl RFH, Friedel S, von Wirén N. 2013. Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiology 163, 161–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harahap SM, Ghulamahdi M, Aziz SA, Sutandi A, Miftahudin. 2014. Relationship of ethylene production and aerenchyme formation on oxidation ability and root surfaced-iron (Fe2+) accumulation under different iron concentrations and rice genotypes. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 4, 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hou NN, You JF, Pang JD, Xu MY, Chen G, Yang ZM. 2010. The accumulation and transport of abscisic acid in soybean (Glycine max L.) under aluminum stress. Plant and Soil 330, 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  20. Inoue H, Mizuno D, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK. 2004. A rice FRD3-like (OsFRDL1) gene is expressed in the cells involved in long-distance transport. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 50, 1133–1140 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang CF, Belfield EJ, Cao Y, Smith YAJ, Harberd NP. 2013. An Arabidopsis soil-salinity-tolerance mutation confers ethylene-mediated enhancement of sodium/potassium homeostasis. Plant Cell 25, 3535–3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khabaz-Saberi H, Barker SJ, Rengel Z. 2012. Tolerance to ion toxicities enhances wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield in waterlogged acidic soils. Plant and Soil 354, 371–381. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khabaz-Saberi H, Rengel Z, Wilson R, Setter TL. 2010. Variation for tolerance to high concentration of ferrous iron (Fe2+) in Australian hexaploid wheat. Euphytica 172, 275–283. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kinraide TB. 2003. Toxicity factors in acidic forest soils: attempts to evaluate separately the toxic effects of excessive Al3+ and H+ and insufficient Ca2+ and Mg2+ upon root elongation. European Journal of Soil Science 54, 323–333. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kobayashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Watanabe T, Shaff JE, Ohta H, Kochian LV, Wagatsuma T, Kinraide TB, Koyama H. 2013. Molecular and physiological analysis of Al3+ and H+ rhizotoxicities at moderately acidic conditions. Plant Physiology 163, 180–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kosegarten H, Hoffmann B, Rroco E. 2004. Apoplastic pH and Fe-III reduction in young sunflower (Helianthus annuus) roots. Physiologia Plantarum 122, 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  27. Koyama H, Toda T, Hara T. 2001. Brief exposure to low-pH stress causes irreversible damage to the growing root in Arabidopsis thaliana: pectin–Ca interaction may play an important role in proton rhizotoxicity. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 361–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehotai N, Kolbert Z, Peto A, Feigl G, Ordog A, Kumar D, Tari I, Erdei L. 2012. Selenite-induced hormonal and signaling mechanisms during root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 5677–5687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li GJ, Li BH, Dong GQ, Feng XY, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. 2013. Ammonium-induced shoot ethylene production is associated with the inhibition of lateral root formation in Arabidopsis . Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 1413–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li H, Yang X, Luo AC. 2001. Ameliorating effect of potassium on iron toxicity in hybrid rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24, 1849–1860. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li Q, Li BH, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. 2010. Root growth inhibition by NH4 + in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH4 + efflux and GMPase activity. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 1529–1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li XN, Ma HZ, Jia PX, Wang J, Jia LY, Zhang TG, Yang YL, Chen HJ, Wei X. 2012. Responses of seedling growth and antioxidant activity to excess iron and copper in Triticum aestivum L. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 86, 47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Majerus V, Bertin P, Lutts S. 2009. Abscisic acid and oxidative stress implications in overall ferritin synthesis by African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) seedlings exposed to short term iron toxicity. Plant and Soil 324, 253–265. [Google Scholar]
  34. Majerus V, Bertin P, Lutts S. 2007. a . Effects of iron toxicity on osmotic potential, osmolytes and polyamines concentration in the African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud). Plant Science 173, 96–105. [Google Scholar]
  35. Majerus V, Bertin P, Swenden V, Fortemps A, Lobréaux S, Lutts S. 2007. b . Organ-dependent responses of the African rice to short-term iron toxicity: ferritin regulation and antioxidative responses. Biologia Plantarum 51, 303–331. [Google Scholar]
  36. McLaughlin BE, Loon GW, Crowder AA. 1985. Comparison of selected washing treatments on Agrostis gigantean samples from mine tailings near Copper Cliff, Ontario, before analysis for Cu, Ni, Fe and K content. Plant Soil 85, 433–436. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mi WJ, Cai JB, Tuo Y, Zhu H, Hua YM, Zhao JW, Zhou WB, Zhu DW. 2013. Distinguishable root plaque on root surface of Potamogeton crispus grown in two sediments with different nutrient status. Limnology 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  38. Peng XX, Yamauchi M. 1993. Ethylene production in rice bronzing leaves induced by ferrous iron. Plant and Soil 149, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  39. Petit JM, Briat JF, Lobreaux S. 2001. Structure and differential expression of the four members of the Arabidopsis thaliana ferritin gene family. Biochemical Journal 359, 575–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pich A, Manteuffel R, Hillmer S, Scholz G, Schmidt W. 2001. Fe homeostasis in plant cell: does nicotianamine play multiple roles in the regulation of cytoplasmic Fe concentration? Planta 213, 967–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pierik R, Tholen D, Poorter H, Visser EJW, Voesenek LACJ. 2006. The Janus face of ethylene: growth inhibition and stimulation. Trends in Plant Science 11, 176–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reyt G, Boudouf S, Boucherez J, Gaymard F, Briat JF. 2014. Iron and ferritin dependent ROS distribution impact Arabidopsis root system architecture. Molecular Plant 10.1093/mp/ssu133 (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sabatini S, Heidstra R, Wildwater M, Scheres B. 2003. SCARECROW is involved in positioning the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Genes and Development 17, 354–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaff JE, Schultz BA, Craft EJ, Clark RT, Kochian LV. 2010. GEOCHEM-EZ: a chemical speciation program with greater power and flexibility. Plant Soil 330, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  45. Staal M, Cnodder TD, Simon D, Vandenbussche F, Straeten DVD, Verbelen JP, Elzenga T, Vissenberg K. 2011. Apoplastic alkalinization is instrumental for the inhibition of cell elongation in the Arabidopsis root by the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Plant Physiology 155, 2049–2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stacey MG, Patel A, McClain WE, Mathieu M, Remley M, Rogers EE, Gassmann W, Blevins DG, Stacey G. 2008. The Arabidopsis AtOPT3 protein functions in metal homeostasis and movement of iron to developing seeds. Plant Physiology 146, 589–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun P, Tian QY, Chen J, Zhang WH. 2010. Aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation in Arabidopsisis mediated by ethylene and auxin. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 347–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Szczerba MW, Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. 2009. K+ transport in plants: physiology and molecular biology. Journal of Plant Physiology 166, 447–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Taylor GJ, Crowder AA, Rodden R. 1984. Formation and morphology of an iron plaque on the roots of Typha latifolia L. grown in solution culture. American Journal of Botany 71, 666–675. [Google Scholar]
  50. Trull MC, Guiltinan MJ, Lynch JP, Deikman J. 1997. The responses of wild-type and ABA mutant Arabidopsis thaliana plants to phosphorus starvation. Plant, Cell & Environment 20, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang KLC, Yoshida H, Lurin C, Ecker JR. 2004. Regulation of ethylene gas biosynthesis by the Arabidopsis ETO1 protein. Nature 428, 945–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang NN, Shih MC, Li N. 2005. The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of Arabidopsis ACC synthase genes AtACS4, AtACS5, and AtACS7 induced by hormones and stresses. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 909–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weigel D, Glazebrook J. 2002. Arabidopsis: A laboratory manual . New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 243–245. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wintermans JFGM, de Mots A. 1965. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 109, 448–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Xu WF, Jia LG, Shi WM, Liang J, Zhou F, Li Q, Zhang JH. 2013. Abscisic acid accumulation modulates auxin transport in the root tip to enhance proton secretion for maintaining root growth under moderate water stress. New Phytologist 197, 139–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yamauchi M, Peng XX. 1995. Iron toxicity and stress-induced ethylene production in rice leaves. Plant and Soil 173, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang JL, Zheng SJ, He YF, Matsumoto H. 2005. Aluminium resistance requires resistance to acid stress: a case study with spinach that exudes oxalate rapidly when exposed to Al stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 1197–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science . Manila, The Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang H, Forde BG. 1998. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 279, 407–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang Y, Wang YP, Liu P, Song JM, Xu GD, Zheng GH. 2012. Effect of toxic Fe2+ level on the biological characteristics of rice root border cell. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 59, 766–771. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang Y, Zheng GH, Liu P, Song JM, Xu GD, Cai MZ. 2011. Morphological and physiological responses of root tip cells to Fe2+ toxicity in rice. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33, 683–689. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES