Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fungal Genet Biol. 2014 Sep 28;73:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.09.007

Distinct and redundant roles of exonucleases in Cryptococcus neoformans: Implications for virulence and mating

Carolin Wollschlaeger 1, Nuria Trevijano-Contador 2, Xuying Wang 3,, Mélanie Legrand 1, Oscar Zaragoza 2, Joseph Heitman 3, Guilhem Janbon 1,*
PMCID: PMC4382001  NIHMSID: NIHMS671846  PMID: 25267175

Abstract

Opportunistic pathogens like Cryptococcus neoformans are constantly exposed to changing environments, in their natural habitat as well as when encountering a human host. This requires a coordinated program to regulate gene expression that can act at the levels of mRNA synthesis and also mRNA degradation. Here, we find that deletion of the gene encoding the major cytoplasmic 5’→3’ exonuclease Xrn1p in C. neoformans has important consequences for virulence associated phenotypes such as growth at 37°C, capsule and melanin. In an invertebrate model of cryptococcosis the alteration of these virulence properties corresponds to avirulence of the xrn1Δ mutant strains. Additionally, deletion of XRN1 impairs uni- and bisexual mating. On a molecular level, the absence of XRN1 is associated with the upregulation of other major exonuclease encoding genes (i.e. XRN2 and RRP44). Using inducible alleles of RRP44 and XRN2, we show that artificial overexpression of these genes alters LAC1 gene expression and mating. Our data thus suggest the existence of a complex interdependent regulation of exonuclease encoding genes that impact upon virulence and mating in C. neoformans.

Keywords: Cryptococcus neoformans, virulence, XRN1, mating

1. Introduction

Common to all messenger RNAs, irrespective of the myriad of functions they fulfil, are their beginning by transcription and their ending by degradation. Whereas transcription occurs exclusively in the nucleus, degradation of mRNAs is a process found in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm, operated by compartment-specific machineries that are however similar from a mechanistic point of view (see (Garneau et al. 2007) for review). In the nucleus and the cytoplasm, 3’→5’ decay is carried out by the exosome (see (Chlebowski et al. 2013) for review). This multiprotein complex harbours two catalytic active subunits, Rrp44p and Rrp6p with the latter being specific to the nucleus. 5’→3’ decay requires a protein of the Xrn family (Xrn2p/Rat1p in the nucleus, Xrn1p in the cytoplasm; see (Nagarajan et al. 2013) for review). It could be assumed that mutations in one of these global players have comparable consequences for every transcript and deletions are presumably fatal, which is what is found across species for Rrp44p/Dis3p and Xrn2p/Rat1p. On the other hand, deletion of XRN1 is tolerated by the cell, yet accompanied by pleiotropic phenotypes, evident from the independent identification of XRN1 in various screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Originally isolated as necessary for nuclear fusion in S. cerevisiae (Kim et al. 1990), Xrn1p also regulates a large number of processes including filamentation (Kim and Kim 2002) and resistance to different drugs among which is fluconazole (Kapitzky et al. 2010). Xrn1p was also identified as a regulator of filamentation in Candida albicans (An et al. 2004), assigning a potential role for Xrn1p in fungal pathogenesis because of the requirements for filaments in pathogenesis in this species.

Initially the phenotypes of mutants without XRN1 were attributed exclusively to secondary consequences that the absence of Xrn1p has (i.e. alteration of transcript levels). However, it was found in baker's yeast that these phenotypes are in part due to Xrn1p-specific functions that are independent of its exonucleolytic activity (Solinger and Pascolini 1999). Interestingly, Xrn1p has been recently shown to directly associate with chromatin (Haimovich et al. 2013), thus regulating transcription of gene expression.

The basidiomycetous yeast Cryptococcus neoformans is a major human pathogen responsible for more than an estimated 1,000,000 infections and about 600,000 deaths per year (Park et al. 2009). Like most fungal pathogens, its global importance is due mainly to its capacity to infect immunocompromised individuals such as HIV/AIDS patients or people receiving organ/bone marrow transplants. Three major virulence factors of C. neoformans have been established: 1. the ability to grow at 37°C (Perfect 2006; Vecchiarelli and Monari 2012), 2. the presence of a polysaccharide capsule (Vecchiarelli and Monari 2012) and 3. the production of the pigment melanin (Williamson 1997). The genomes of two varieties of C. neoformans have been sequenced and annotated (Loftus et al. 2005; Janbon et al. 2014). These studies revealed very complex transcriptomes being very intron-rich (99% of the genes contain introns) and in which alternative splicing is common (Grützmann et al. 2014; Janbon et al. 2014). Moreover, numbers of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), mainly antisense, have been identified and a large set of proteins orthologous to metazoan serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins has been identified (Janbon et al. 2014); (Warnecke et al. 2008). C. neoformans is an opportunistic pathogen and its natural habitat is outside an animal host e.g. in the soil or in association with certain tree species (Lin and Heitman 2006). As such it needs to cope with a large number of stresses. It has been hypothesized that its complex and plastic transcriptome provides an easy way to alter its metabolism in order to colonize successfully a large diversity of environmental niches.

Recently, we identified the two essential exonucleases Xrn2p and Rrp44p as being key partners in the intron-dependent regulation of gene expression in C. neoformans (Goebels et al. 2013). Here, we describe the characterisation of a xrn1Δ strain in C. neoformans. We find that the deletion of this gene is associated with the alteration of several virulence factors which manifests in avirulence of the mutant strain. Further, we find that Xrn1p is needed for the regular succession of the mating process. We also observed that the deletion of XRN1 is associated with an upregulation of RRP44 and XRN2. Finally, our experiments showed that artificial overexpression of RRP44 and XRN2 is sufficient to alter LAC1 expression and mating. Taken together, these results suggest that a fine-tuned, interdependent regulation of the major exonucleases controls virulence and mating in C. neoformans.

2. Material and Methods

2.1 Strains and culture conditions

C. neoformans strains used in this study are all serotype D strains and are listed in Table 1. The strains were routinely cultured on YPD medium at 30°C (Sherman 1992). Synthetic dextrose (SD) was prepared as described (Sherman 1992).

Table 1.

List of the C. neoformans var. neoformans strains used in this study.

Name Genotype Construction details Reference
JEC33 MATα lys2 Wickes and Edman, 1995
XL280 MATα Lin et al., 2005
NE292 MATa cas3 Δi ade2 ura5 Goebels et al., 2013
NE718 MATα rrp6Δ::NEO cas3 Δi ura5 Goebels et al., 2013
NE730 MATα NAT-PGAL7::RRP44 lys2 Goebels et al., 2013
NE787 MATa NAT-PGAL7::RRP44 Goebels et al., 2013
NE791 MATa cas3 Δi NAT-PGAL7::RRP44 Goebels et al., 2013
NE809 MATa xrn1Δ::NAT cas3 Δi ade2 ura5 Biolistic transformation NE292 This study
NE822 MAT a Cross JEC33 × NE809 This study
NE824 MATα Cross JEC33 × NE809 This study
NE826 MATa xrn1Δ::NAT Cross JEC33 × NE809 This study
NE828 MATα xrn1Δ::NAT Cross JEC33 × NE809 This study
NE867 MATα xrn1Δ::NEO lys2 Biolistic transformation JEC33 This study
NE856 MATα NEO-PGAL7::XRN2 lys2 Goebels et al., 2013
NE874 MATa cas3 Δi NEO-PGAL7::XRN2 ade2 ura5 Goebels et al., 2013
NE923 MATα xrn1Δ::NAT Biolistic transformation XL280 This study
NE924 MATα xrn1Δ::NEO Biolistic transformation XL280 This study

Strains were grown overnight at 30°C in liquid YPD, serially diluted (104 – 101) and spotted onto different solid media to determine growth phenotypes. Likewise, melanin production was assessed after spotting serial dilutions of cells of each strain on Niger agar medium (Walton et al. 2005); all plates were read after 48h of incubation at 30°C, unless otherwise stated.

2.2 Immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies (MAb)

The anticapsular MAb E1 (Dromer et al. 1988) (kindly provided by F. Dromer, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), CRND-8 (Ikeda et al. 1996) (kindly provided by T. Shinoda, Tokyo, Japan), 4H3, 2H1, and 5E4 (Casadevall and Scharff 1991) (kindly provided by A. Casadevall, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y.) were used in immunoblotting experiments, with techniques as previously described (Janbon et al. 2001).

2.3 RNA extraction and northern blot analysis

Cells were routinely harvested after being grown up to 5×107 cells/mL in YPD. RNA was extracted with TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (5 μg) was separated by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and probed with [32P]dCTP-radiolabelled DNA fragments. β-particle emissions were quantified with a Typhoon 9200 imager (GE Healthcare) and Image Quantifier 5.2 software (Molecular Dynamics, Fairfield, CT).

For the analysis of LAC1 expression under carbon starvation conditions, 4×106 cells/mL were grown in 50 mL of YPD or YPG for 3 hours. At 3 hours, cells were collected by centrifugation, washed with sterile distilled water, resuspended in 50 mL of Asparagine medium without glucose (1 g/L asparagine, 0.1 g/L MgSO4, 10 mM NaH2PO4; pH 6.5) and incubated in this medium for another 3 hours.

2.4 Gene disruption

The genes described in this report have been deleted by biolistic transformation of a serotype D strain using a disruption cassette constructed by overlapping PCR as previously described (Moyrand et al. 2004). The primer sequences used are given in Table A.1. The transformants were then screened for homologous integration as previously described (Moyrand et al. 2004). The plasmid, pNAT used to amplify the NAT selective marker was kindly provided by Dr Jennifer Lodge (Saint Louis University School of Medicine). The plasmid pPZP-NEO1 was used to amplify the NEO selective marker. Multiple mutant strains were obtained through crosses of single mutant strains on V8 medium as previously described (Moyrand et al. 2004). Progenies were selected on minimum medium. Their genotypes were determined by PCR. The mating types of the strains were determined by crossing them on V8 medium to tester strains of known mating type.

2.5 Capsule growth

To induce capsule enlargement, cells were incubated overnight in liquid Sabouraud medium (Oxoid, England) at 30°C with moderate shaking, and then transferred to 10% Sabouraud medium at pH 7.3 buffered with 50 mM MOPS buffer (Zaragoza and Casadevall 2004) for 24 hours. The cells were then suspended in India Ink, and pictures were taken using a Leica DMI3000 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Capsule size was estimated using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA). The diameter of the total cell size and of the cell body (delimited by the cell wall) was measured, and capsule size was determined as the difference between these two parameters. Statistically-significant differences between samples were determined using ANOVA and Student's t-Test (significance was considered when p<0.05).

2.6 Galleria mellonella infection

Galleria mellonella were infected as previously described (Mylonakis et al. 2005; García-Rodas et al. 2011). The larvae were obtained from Alcotan (Valencia, Spain). Larvae without any dark spots weighting between 0.2-0.3 g were selected and incubated at 30°C or 37°C the day before the infection. To prepare the inocula, yeast were grown overnight in liquid Sabouraud medium at 30°C with moderate shaking, washed with PBS plus ampicillin (50 μg/mL) and suspended in the same buffer. Cell density was estimated with an automatic cell counter TC10 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Then, suspensions at 108 cells/mL were prepared in PBS+ampicillin. Larvae (20 per group) were injected with 10 μL of the yeast suspension (106 yeast cells per larva) through the last right proleg, which was previously cleaned with 70% ethanol. A parallel group of larvae was injected with 10 μL of PBS+ampicillin as a control. The larvae were incubated at 30°C or 37°C, and death was daily monitored for 10 days.

Killing curves were adjusted using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimation of differences in survival were analysed with the log rank and Wilcoxon tests using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). A p-value below 0.05 was considered significant.

2.7 In vivo phagocytosis assay

Yeasts were grown overnight in liquid Sabouraud medium, washed with PBS and stained with 10 μg/mL Calcofluor white (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Then, these cells were injected into G. mellonella (106 cells/larva) as described above. After 3 hours of incubation at 30°C or 37°C, haemolymph was collected in 1.5 mL tubes in 50 μL cold PBS to avoid coagulation and melanization of the haemolymph. Haemocytes were placed on a slide and phagocytosis was visually quantified using a Leica DMI 3000B. 100 haemocytes from each larva were counted per experiment and results were expressed as the percentage of haemocytes that contained internalized cryptococcal cells.

2.8 Growth curves

Yeast strains were grown overnight in liquid Sabouraud medium. Then, cellular suspensions at 2×105 cell/mL were prepared in fresh liquid Sabouraud medium and 170 μL were placed in 96-well microdilution plates (Costar, New York, NY). The plate was placed in an IEMS Reader MF spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and incubated at 30°C or 37°C with shaking. Optical density (OD) was determined at 540 nm every hour for 72 hours. Data were processed with GraphPad Prism 5 software.

2.9 Mating and cell fusion assays

WT and xrn1Δ mutant cells of opposite mating type were mixed and co-cultured on 5 % V8 juice agar medium (pH 7) and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 1 week. The colonies were photographed following incubation.

To perform the cell fusion assays, wild-type strains JEC33 (MATα) and NE292 (MATa), and xrn1Δ mutant strains NE809 (MATa) and NE867 (MATα) were grown in YPD liquid medium overnight. Cells were washed and adjusted to 2×107 cells/mL, mixed, and grown on V8 mating medium in the dark for 24 h. The colonies were removed with cell scrapers, resuspended in sterile water, and plated onto YNB medium to select for cell–cell fusion products that have both LYS2 and URA5 genes. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 5 days until colonies were observed. The experiment was conducted in three replicates and the average number of colonies was calculated. The fusion efficiency was determined by comparing the average number of the visible colonies from the xrn1Δ mutant cross to that from the wild-type cross.

To determine an effect of xrn1Δ on same sex mating, the gene was deleted in the hyperfilamentous strain XL280 background (Lin et al. 2005), and filamentation was assessed by incubation on V8 mating medium. Pictures were taken with a Leica stereomicroscope.

2.10 Ploidy determination by flow cytometry

Cells were grown to stationary phase in deep well 96-well plates. 107 cells were harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 5000 rpm, room temperature) and fixed in 70 % ethanol for 1 hour at 4°C. Cells were then washed with water, resuspended in 200 μL TE buffer and incubated with 0.5 g/L RNaseA (Fermentas, Germany) overnight at 37°C. The next day, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 500 μL TE buffer. 50 μL of this cell suspension were added to 450 μL Sytox Green (Invitrogen) staining solution (1 μM) and flow cytometry was performed on 40,000 cells on the FL1 channel of a MACSQuant flow cytometer (Miltenyi, Germany).

3. Results

3.1 Interdependent regulation of the different exonuclease genes

We recently reported reciprocal compensation between the major exonucleases Rrp44p and Xrn2p in C. neoformans (Goebels et al. 2013). In the same study, we also found that the deletion of RRP6 is associated with a slight up-regulation of RRP44. We here assayed mRNA accumulation of the major 5’→3’ cytoplasmic exonuclease gene XRN1 in three exonucleolytic mutants. As presented in Figure 1A, expression of XRN1 is slightly increased in all of them (rrp44, xrn2, rrp6Δ). Moreover, upon deletion of the XRN1 gene the transcript levels of RRP44 and XRN2 are significantly increased (Figure 1B). These data suggest a complex interdependent regulation and possible functional redundancies between the different exonucleases.

Figure 1. Widespread compensation between different exonucleases.

Figure 1

A Expression of XRN1 is increased in exonucleolytic mutants. Northern blot experiment results showing the transcript levels of XRN1 in different exonucleolytic mutants. Relative to wild-type level and normalised to ACT1, XRN1 mRNA abundances are 1.8x in the rrp44 strain, 1.7x in the xrn2 strain and 1.3x in the rrp6Δ strain B Deletion of XRN1 is compensated by overexpression of RRP44 and XRN2. Northern blot experiment results showing the transcript levels of RRP44 and XRN2 depending on the presence of XRN1. Normalised to ACT1, RRP44 and XRN2 mRNA abundances in the xrn1Δ mutant strain are 3.5x and 1.8x respectively, relative to wild-type level.

3.2 Deletion of XRN1 results in alteration of multiple virulence factors

We deleted the gene encoding Xrn1p (locus CNE03620) using a nourseothricin marker. The original deletant strain was then backcrossed to a wild-type strain to eliminate the possibility of secondary mutations obscuring the analysis.

As previously reported in S. cerevisiae (Larimer and Stevens 1990), the xrn1Δ mutants show decreased vegetative growth (Figure 2A). Of particular interest for a human pathogen, in C. neoformans this phenotype is exacerbated at 37°C (Figure 2A). Strikingly, we observed an aggravation of the xrn1Δ-related growth impairment at 37°C in MATa relative to MATα strains (Figure 2A, and data not shown). Furthermore, the mutants also show an increased sensitivity to SDS (Figure 2A).

Figure 2. XRN1 deletion alters virulence-associated phenotypes.

Figure 2

A Growth phenotypes associated with XRN1 deletion. Serial dilutions of cells were spotted onto different media. Pictures were taken after 4 (YPD) and 5 (Niger) days, respectively. B Capsule size differences associated with XRN1 deletion. Distribution of capsule diameter of wild-type and xrn1Δ cells at 30°C in Sabouraud medium and diluted Sabouraud medium. The line in each sample denotes the average of the distribution.

In addition to the ability to grow at 37°C, there are other well-defined virulence factors in C. neoformans, such as the presence of an antiphagocytic capsule and the production of melanin. As presented in Figure 2A, xrn1Δ cells lack the ability to produce melanin when grown on Niger seed agar. Wild-type Cryptococcus strains produce melanin under conditions of glucose starvation mainly via a pathway involving the two copper-oxidases Lac1p and Lac2p, with Lac1p being responsible for the majority of laccase activity (Zhu and Williamson 2004). To test whether the deficiency in melanin production observed in the xrn1Δ mutants was a direct consequence of reduced LAC1 expression, we performed northern analyses. The results presented in Figure 3A show that the induction of LAC1 transcription seen in a wild-type strain under glucose-depleted conditions (i.e. growth in Asparagine medium) hardly occurrs in a xrn1Δ mutant.

Figure 3. Expression of LAC1 requires XRN1.

Figure 3

Northern blot analysis of RNA from the indicated cells incubated for 3 hours in YPD (A) or YPG (B) and then shifted for an additional 3 hours to Asparagine medium (Asn) or grown for 6 hours in YPD (A) as control. A Induction of LAC1 by glucose starvation (Asn) in WT and xrn1Δ cells. Relative to wild-type level and normalised to ACT1, LAC1 mRNA abundance in the xrn1Δ strain is 0.1x B LAC1 expression in galactoseinducible mutants of RRP44 and XRN2. Relative to wild-type level and normalised to ACT1, LAC1 mRNA abundances are 0.7x and 0.9x in the PGAL7::XRN2 and PGAL7::RRP44 strains, respectively.

Arguably the most prominent virulence property of C. neoformans is the existence of an antiphagocytic capsule surrounding the yeast cell. Interestingly, an increase in capsule size under capsule inducing conditions (i.e. 10% Sabouraud medium) related to the deletion of XRN1 was found (Figure 2B). The alteration of size was not visible when the cells were cultivated under non-inducing conditions (i.e. standard Sabouraud medium). In order to test whether the deletion of XRN1 is also accompanied by any structural changes in the polysaccharide capsule, we tested the reactivity of wild-type and mutant cells to different anticapsule antibodies. Although wild-type strains of the D serotype do not normally react with the serotype A-specific antibody E1 (Dromer et al. 1987), we found a low but reproducible reactivity of the xrn1Δ strains with this antibody (Figure A.1), pointing to a different structural composition of the capsule (Moyrand et al. 2002) in the absence of XRN1. Also, an increased binding affinity of the anticapsule antibody 4H3 (Mukherjee et al. 1992) is seen for strains bearing the XRN1 deletion (data not shown). In contrast, the same assay using the anticapsular antibodies CRND-8 (Ikeda et al. 1996), 2H1 and 5E4 (Casadevall and Scharff 1991) revealed no difference between the xrn1Δ mutant strains and the wild-type.

3.3 xrn1Δ strains are avirulent in G. mellonella

In vitro determination of virulence factors can give hints as to whether a certain mutant is attenuated for virulence. However, it is not a sufficient substitute for virulence modelling. To confirm the relevance of the altered virulence properties for the overall virulence of xrn1Δ strains, we chose the G. mellonella model of cryptococcosis. Besides the general advantages of invertebrate infection models, such as lower costs and ethical concerns, this model also facilitates infection modelling at a temperature of 30°C where the xrn1Δ growth deficit is minor (Figure 2A and Figure 4A), allowing the assessment of the virulence of the mutants independently of its overall reduced fitness at elevated (mammalian body) temperature.

Figure 4. xrn1Δ cells are avirulent.

Figure 4

A Growth curves of wild-type and xrn1Δ cells at 30°C in Sabouraud medium. B Survival of G. mellonella infected with wild-type and xrn1Δ strains at 30°C. C In vivo phagocytosis of G. mellonella larvae infected with wild-type and xrn1Δ cells at 30°C.

In keeping with the physiological (growth) and biochemical (melanin, capsule structure) characteristics found in vitro, xrn1Δ strains also appeared to be completely avirulent in this invertebrate model of cryptococcosis (Figure 4B). As observed previously, phagocytosis (Figure 4C) does not seem to be an indicator for whether a strain is a successful pathogen or not, but rather a mere consequence of capsule size (García-Rodas et al. 2011) (Figure 2B).

3.4 Absence of XRN1 interferes with mating

The melanin and virulence phenotypes associated with the deletion of XRN1 were partially reminiscent of the phenotypes reported to be associated with the deletion of the VAD1 gene (Panepinto et al. 2005). Vad1p is the homologue of the S. cerevisiae protein Dhh1 which has been shown to activate decapping in response to impaired ribosome elongation thus triggering mRNA to degradation by Xrn1p (Fischer and Weis 2002; Sweet et al. 2012). Vad1p also negatively regulates mating in C. neoformans (Park et al. 2010). Given the role of Xrn1p in the regulation of mating in S. cerevisiae (Kim et al. 1990; Solinger and Pascolini 1999), we characterised the mating process in the absence of XRN1 in C. neoformans. All possible combinations of crosses, i.e. WT(JEC33) x WT(NE292), WT(JEC33) x xrn1Δ(NE809), xrn1Δ(NE867) x WT(NE292) and xrn1Δ(NE867) x xrn1Δ(NE809), were tested. Though no obvious mating defect was observed during unilateral mating between mutant and wild-type strains, a significant mating defect with reduced filamentation was apparent in a bilateral mutant cross (Figure 5A). In addition, less basidiospores were generated during the xrn1Δ x xrn1Δ cross. Furthermore, cell fusion assays (see 2.9) revealed that xrn1Δ cells were less efficient in cell fusion (10 % of wild-type level).

Figure 5. Deletion of XRN1 affects sexual reproduction.

Figure 5

A xrn1Δ mutants show a defect in bisexual mating. Mating between WT and xrn1Δ mutant cells of opposite mating type were mixed and co-cultured on 5% V8 juice agar medium (pH 7) and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 1 week. The colonies were photographed following incubation. Scale bar = 10 μm. B Deletion of XRN1 suppresses the hyperfilamentous phenotype of XL280. Strains were incubated on V8 juice agar medium (pH 7) for 15 days at room temperature in the dark. Pictures were taken with a Leica stereomicroscope. Scale bar = 5 mm.

Analysis of the phenotypes of 96 randomly chosen progenies revealed a non-Mendelian repartition of the nourseothricin resistance phenotype (8/96) associated with the XRN1 deletion cassette (Table A.2). We also analysed the ploidy of these isolates by flow cytometry (see 2.10) but we did not detect any diploid isolates among them (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results of ploidy analysis by flow cytometry.

Cross Number of isolates analysed Number of diploid strains
WT × WT 86 1
WT × xrnlΔ 92 0
RRP44OE × WT 92 4
WT × XRN2OE 93 3
RRP44OE × XRN2OE 94 6

Besides the well-defined a-α opposite sexual cycle, C. neoformans can also undergo α-α unisexual reproduction. While both these forms of sexual reproduction share common regulators, they are mechanistically similar but distinct (Wang and Lin 2011). To test whether the effect of XRN1 deletion is specific to only the bisexual cycle, we deleted the gene also in the hypersexual haploid strain XL280 (Lin et al. 2005). As demonstrated in Figure 5B, absence of XRN1 suppresses the filamentous phenotype of the XL280 strain when grown on mating-inducing media (V8). Based on this observation we conclude that Xrn1p most likely affects part of the regulatory pathway that is common to same and opposite sex mating.

3.5 Overexpression of XRN2 or RRP44 is enough to alter LAC1 expression in C. neoformans

Our data show that the melanin deficiency phenotype of the xrn1Δ strain is probably due to the near absence of LAC1 expression when the mutant strains are cultured in Asparagine medium. This absence of LAC1 expression might be due to no expression induction in the xrn1Δ mutant. Another possibility is that the LAC1 transcripts are rapidly degraded in a xrn1Δ context due to an increased activity of other exonucleases (Figure 1B and Figure 3A). Using regulatable alleles of RRP44 (PGAL7::RRP44) and XRN2 (PGAL7::XRN2), where the native promoters have been replaced with the GAL7 promoter, we assayed LAC1 transcript levels in these strains growing under inducing conditions (i.e. YP Galactose) prior to shifting them to Asparagine medium. The results presented in Figure 3B show that LAC1 induction is slightly less pronounced in the PGAL7::RRP44 or PGAL7::XRN2 strains compared to wild-type, though clearly superior to the level observed in xrn1Δ cells. We also looked at a different way to induce LAC1 expression by the addition of copper that has been reported for the serotype A (Jiang et al. 2009). However, its independence from the carbon source does not seem to be conserved between serotypes as LAC1 is almost undetectable in cells grown in Asparagine medium supplemented with glucose irrespective of the addition of copper (data not shown) and thus does not represent an alternative. Overall, although the precise mechanism by which XRN1 deletion leads to LAC1 repression remains to be defined, our data demonstrate that the sole overexpression of RRP44 or XRN2 is enough to modulate LAC1 expression.

3.6 Induced overexpression of RRP44 or XRN2 affects mating

We also tested whether induced overexpression of RRP44 or XRN2 would perturb the mating process using the galactose-inducible alleles. Therefore, we co-cultured the different mutant strains together with wild-type or mutant strains on V8 agar supplemented with 2 % galactose in order to induce transcription from the GAL7 promoter. Robust filamentation was observed in all possible combinations (data not shown).

To characterise further a potential perturbance of the mating process caused by overexpression of XRN2 (XRN2OE) or RRP44 (RRP44OE), we screened progeny from different crosses, i.e. RRP44OE x WT, WT x XRN2OE and RRP44OE x XRN2OE. First, by flow cytometrical analysis, we noticed an increased number of diploid strains coming from crosses of the overexpression mutants with WT, i.e. RRP44OE x WT, WT x XRN2OE (Table 2). Next, we screened the progeny with respect to segregation of different markers (Table A.2). In these single overexpression mutant x WT crosses, irrespective of a Mendelian-like segregation of the dominant selectable markers used to tag the regulatable alleles (47/96 for PGAL7::RRP44::NAT, 41/96 for PGAL7::XRN2::NEO), 15 % of PGAL7::RRP44 and 100 % of PGAL7::XRN2 strains retained the ability to grow on YPD which for haploid strains necessitates a wild-type copy of RRP44 or XRN2, respectively (Goebels et al. 2013). This result suggested that the strains could be heterozygous for these loci. Indeed, PCR analysis of randomly chosen clones confirmed the presence of the additional wild-type allele (Figure 6A and data not shown). Moreover, although detection of potential aneuploidy by multiplex PCR did not yield conclusive results (Figure A.2), a potential aneuploidy for chromosome 4 (harbouring RRP44 as well as the MAT locus) in some of the descendants from the RRP44OE x WT cross seems likely, as selected PGAL7::RRP44::NAT strains, that were haploid as assessed by flow cytometry (Figure 6C), filamented when cultured on V8 + 2 % galactose (Figure 6B).

Figure 6. Overexpression of RRP44 or XRN2 perturbs mating.

Figure 6

A Matings in which XRN2 is overexpressed (WT x XRN2OE) yield haploid progeny that contain both, the wild-type XRN2 and the PGAL7::XRN2 alleles. PCR analysis showing the simultaneous presence of wild-type and PGAL7 alleles of XRN2 in progeny from the WT x XRN2OE cross. PCR with primers flanking the XRN2 promoter region yield a fragment of about 2.7 kb for the wild-type allele and 4.5 kb for the PGAL7 allele. B Progeny strains (III-17, III-51) from matings in which RRP44 is overexpressed (RRP44OE x WT) filament on V8 + 2 % galactose. C Progeny strains (III-17, III-51) from matings in which RRP44 is overexpressed (RRP44OE x WT) are haploid as determined by flow cytometry.

The double mutant cross (RRP44OE x XRN2OE ) further illustrated the intertwined, yet partially independent roles that these two exonucleases play during the mating process. The more frequent occurrence of diploid progeny, found in the single overexpression mutant x WT crosses (RRP44OE x WT, WT x XRN2OE) was also observed in progeny from the RRP44OE x XRN2OE cross (Table 2). Further screening of the progenies from this cross yielded an unexpected high portion of PGAL7::RRP44 single mutants (59/96) whereas PGAL7::XRN2 single mutant (16/96), PGAL7::RRP44 PGAL7::XRN2 double mutant (11/96) and wild-type (10/96) strains were present in equal, though much lower than expected quantities (Table A.2). As already observed in progeny from the WT x XRN2OE cross, all PGAL7::XRN2 descendants of the double mutant cross regained the ability to grow on YPD which coincided with the additional presence of the wild-type allele of XRN2 (Table A.2). Similarly, all 7 double mutant strains that were haploid by flow cytometry contained a wild-type copy of XRN2 (Table A.2). Overall, these data indicate that increased expression of either of these two exonucleases is sufficient to severely perturb the regular succession of the sexual reproduction process.

4. Discussion

This study identifies the cytoplasmic exonuclease Xrn1p as a regulator of multiple virulence factors in C. neoformans, extending previous studies that have found a central role for RNA metabolic processes in stress adaptation and virulence in this fungus (see (Bloom and Panepinto 2014) for a recent review).

One consequence of deletion of XRN1 is severely impaired cryptococcal growth at 37°C. Thermotolerance can be characterised as a virulence factor of “disproportionate importance” (Coelho et al. 2014) as it clearly delimits the comparatively few fungal species capable of causing systemic infections in humans (Robert and Casadevall 2009). Unlike capsule synthesis or melanin production, growth at elevated temperature requires adaptation of the whole cellular machinery and is consequently accompanied by extensive changes in gene expression (Steen et al. 2002; Kraus et al. 2004; Chow et al. 2007). These alterations involve mRNA synthesis as well as degradation. Recent work from the Panepinto lab explored the involvement of Ccr4p in the cellular response to host temperature (Havel et al. 2011; Bloom et al. 2013). Ccr4p-mediated deadenylation represents the initial step in cytoplasmic mRNA turnover that ultimately leads to 5’→3’ degradation by Xrn1p. Partially resembling phenotypes of strains with CCR4 and XRN1 mutations underline a functional connection. The heightened importance of Xrn1p in the coordination of mRNA synthesis and degradation was elegantly shown in two global studies in S. cerevisiae (Haimovich et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2013). Chromatin association of S. cerevisiae Xrn1p as reported by Haimovich et al. points to a role for Xrn1p in transcription. Assuming an involvement of Xrn1p in transcription also in C. neoformans could explain the observed impact that XRN1 deletion has on LAC1 expression and thus melanin production. Hence, the at first counter-intuitive observation of reduced LAC1 mRNA levels upon deletion of this exonuclease might be due to an involvement of Xrn1p in LAC1 transcription alongside with increased degradation of LAC1 by xrn1Δ-induced expression of other exonucleases.

The laccase defect that we found associated with deletion of XRN1 mimics that of a vad1Δ strain. A mutant in the DEAD-box RNA helicase encoding gene VAD1 was initially isolated in an insertional mutagenesis screen for laccase-deficiency (Panepinto et al. 2005). Localisation studies describe an accumulation of Vad1p in P-body-like structures (Panepinto et al. 2005). These “factories for mRNA decay” are clearly linked to Xrn1p activity in yeast (Sheth and Parker 2003; Kulkarni et al. 2010). A co-operative activity of Vad1p and Xrn1p could thus be at the origin of LAC1 repression. However, the interaction between Vad1p and Xrn1p does not seem to be readily defined when considering the xrn1Δ-related perturbance of the mating process described in this study that is reversed to that found for vad1Δ (Park et al. 2010). Further studies are obviously needed to elucidate their interconnection.

The pleiotropic roles of Xrn1p partially stem from its function as an exonuclease. Redundancy of this exonuclease activity in the cell obstructs a clear view of its functions. Comparison of the effect that induced overexpression of RRP44 and XRN2 has on the mating process helped to characterise the XRN1-related mating phenotype as being distinct from the exonucleolytic compensation, i.e. increased expression of RRP44 and XRN2 upon XRN1 deletion. At the same time, our data from mating experiments in which RRP44 or XRN2 were overexpressed clearly show the importance of equilibrated levels of exonucleases for successful sexual reproduction. Elucidation of the underlying molecular mechanisms promises to aid in understanding the regulation of the mating process. Overall, the here presented work adds Xrn1p to the growing number of RNA-related factors that orchestrate virulence in C. neoformans. It is apparent that a better understanding of the RNA metabolism present in this basidiomycete can give valuable insight into its multifaceted lifestyle, crucial to counter this pathogenic challenge.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table A 2
Supplemental figures and table

Figure A.1: Deletion of XRN1 leads to changes in the capsule structure. Dotblot analysis of the capsule structure. Serial dilutions of cell suspensions of serotype D WT and xrn1Δ mutant cells were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with antibody E1.

Figure A.2. Multiplex PCR analysis of mating progeny. 2 μL of PCR using primers and protocol described in (Ni et al. 2013) were loaded on a 1.8 % agarose gel.

Figure A.3. Additional growth phenotypes of xrn1Δ strains. Serial dilutions of cells were spotted onto different media. Pictures were taken after 4 days.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to F. Dromer (France), T. Shinoda (Japan) and A. Casadevall (USA) for their generous gifts of MAb. We thank J. Lodge (USA) for plasmids. This work was supported by a grant from ANR (2010-BLAN-1620-01 program YeastIntrons) to GJ.

CW was a recipient of a scholarship from the Pasteur-Paris University International Doctoral Program/Institut Carnot Maladies Infectieuses.

References

  1. An H, Lee K, Kim J. Identification of an exoribonuclease homolog, CaKEM1/CaXRN1, in Candida albicans and its characterization in filamentous growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;235:297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom ALM, Panepinto J. RNA biology and the adaptation of Cryptococcus neoformans to host temperature and stress. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA. 2014;5:393–406. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloom ALM, Solomons JTG, Havel VE, Panepinto JC. Uncoupling of mRNA synthesis and degradation impairs adaptation to host temperature in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol. 2013;89:65–83. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Casadevall A, Scharff MD. The mouse antibody response to infection with Cryptococcus neoformans: VH and VL usage in polysaccharide binding antibodies. J Exp Med. 1991;174:151–160. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chlebowski A, Lubas M, Jensen TH, Dziembowski A. RNA decay machines: the exosome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1829:552–560. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chow ED, Liu OW, O'Brien S, Madhani HD. Exploration of whole-genome responses of the human AIDS-associated yeast pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans var grubii: nitric oxide stress and body temperature. Curr Genet. 2007;52:137–148. doi: 10.1007/s00294-007-0147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coelho C, Bocca AL, Casadevall A. The tools for virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014;87:1–41. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800261-2.00001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dromer F, Aucouturier P, Clauvel JP, Saimot G, Yeni P. Cryptococcus neoformans antibody levels in patients with AIDS. Scan J Infect Dis. 1988;20:283–285. doi: 10.3109/00365548809032452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dromer F, Charreire J, Contrepois A, Carbon C, Yeni P. Protection of mice against experimental cryptococcosis by anti-Cryptococcus neoformans monoclonal antibody. Infect Immun. 1987;55:749–752. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.3.749-752.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer N, Weis K. The DEAD box protein Dhh1 stimulates the decapping enzyme Dcp1. EMBO J. 2002;21:2788–2797. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. García-Rodas R, Casadevall A, Rodríguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M, Zaragoza O. Cryptococcus neoformans capsular enlargement and cellular gigantism during Galleria mellonella infection. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garneau NL, Wilusz J, Wilusz CJ. The highways and byways of mRNA decay. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8:113–126. doi: 10.1038/nrm2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goebels C, Thonn A, Gonzalez-Hilarion S, Rolland O, Moyrand F, Beilharz TH, Janbon G. Introns regulate gene expression in Cryptococcus neoformans in a Pab2p dependent pathway. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grützmann K, Szafranski K, Pohl M, Voigt K, Petzold A, Schuster S. Fungal alternative splicing is associated with multicellular complexity and virulence: a genome-wide multi-species study. DNA Res. 2014;21:27–39. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dst038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haimovich G, Medina DA, Causse SZ, Garber M, Millán-Zambrano G, Barkai O, Chávez S, Pérez-Ortín JE, Darzacq X, Choder M. Gene expression is circular: factors for mRNA degradation also foster mRNA synthesis. Cell. 2013;153:1000–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Havel VE, Wool NK, Ayad D, Downey KM, C.F. W, Larsen F, Djordjevic JT, Panepinto JC. Ccr4 promotes resolution of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response during host temperature adaptation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10:895–901. doi: 10.1128/EC.00006-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ikeda R, Nishimura S, Nishikawa A, Shinoda T. Production of agglutinating monoclonal antibody against antigen 8 specific for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype D. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996;3:89–92. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.1.89-92.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janbon G, Himmelreich U, Moyrand F, Improvisi L, Dromer F. Cas1p is a membrane protein necessary for the O-acetylation of the Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42:453–469. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02651.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Janbon G, Ormerod KL, Paulet D, Byrnes III EJ, Chatterjee G, Yadav V, Mullapudi N, Hon CC, Billmyre RB, Brunel F, Bahn YS, Chen W, Y. C, Chow EWL, Coppée JY, Floyd-Averette A, Gaillardin C, Gerik KJ, Goldberg J, Gonzalez-Hilarion S, Gujja S, Hamlin JL, Hsueh YP, Ianiri G, Jones S, Kodira CD, Kozubowski L, Lam W, Marra M, Mesner LD, Mieczkowski PA, Moyrand F, Nielsen K, Proux C, Rossignol T, Schein JE, Sun S, Wollschlaeger C, Wood IA, Zeng Q, Neuvéglise C, Newlon CS, Perfect JR, Lodge JK, Idnurm A, Stajich JE, Kronstad JW, Sanyal K, Heitman J, Fraser JA, Cuomo CA, Dietrich FS. Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii reveals complex RNA expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang N, Sun N, Xiao D, Pan J, Wang Y, Zhu X. A copper-responsive factor gene CUF1 is required for copper induction of laccase in Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;296:84–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kapitzky L, Beltrao P, Berens TJ, Gassner N, Zhou G, Wüster A, Wu J, Babu MM, Elledge SJ, Toczyski D, Lokey RS, Krogana NJ. Cross-species chemogenomic profiling reveals evolutionarily conserved drug mode of action. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010;6:451. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim J, Kim J. KEM1 is involved in filamentous growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;216:33–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim J, Ljungdahlt P, Fink GR, Dutcher CDC. kem mutations affect nuclear fusion in S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1990;812:799–812. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kraus PR, Boily MJ, Giles SS, Stajich JE, Allen A, Cox GM, Dietrich FS, Perfect JR, Heitman J. Identification of Cryptococcus neoformans temperature-regulated genes with a genomic microarray. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3:1249–1260. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.5.1249-1260.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kulkarni M, Ozgur S, Stoecklin G. On track with P-bodies. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010;38:242–251. doi: 10.1042/BST0380242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Larimer F, Stevens A. Disruption of the gene XRN1, coding for a 5′→ 3′ exoribonuclease, restricts yeast cell growth. Gene. 1990;95:85–90. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90417-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin X, Heitman J. The biology of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:69–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin X, Hull CM, Heitman J. Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans. Nature. 2005;434:1017–1021. doi: 10.1038/nature03448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loftus B, Fung E, Roncaglia P, Rowley D, Amedeo P, Bruno D, Vamathevan J, Miranda M, Anderson I, Fraser JA, Allen J, Bosdet I, Brent MR, Chiu R, Doering TL, Donlin MJ, D'Souza CA, Fox DS, Grinberg V, Fu J, Fukushima M, Haas B, Huang JC, Janbon G, Jones S, Krzywinski MI, Kwon-Chung KJ, Lengeler KB, Maiti R, Marra M, Marra RE, Mathewson C, Mitchell TG, Pertea M, Riggs F, Salzberg SL, Schein J, Shvartsbeyn A, Shin H, Specht C, Suh B, Tenney A, Utterback T, Wickes BL, Wye N, Kronstad JW, Lodge JK, Heitman J, Davis RW, Fraser CM, Hyman RW. The genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans, a basidiomycetous fungal pathogen of humans. Science. 2005;307:1321–1324. doi: 10.1126/science.1103773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moyrand F, Chang YC, Himmelreich U, Kwon-Chung KJ, Janbon G. Cas3p belongs to a seven member family of capsule structure designer proteins. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3:1513–1524. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.6.1513-1524.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moyrand F, Klaproth B, Himmelreich U, Dromer F, Janbon G. Isolation and characterization of capsule structure mutant strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol. 2002;45:837–849. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mukherjee J, Scharff MD, Casadevall A. Protective murine monoclonal antibodies to Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 1992;60:4534–4541. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4534-4541.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mylonakis E, Moreno E, El Khoury JB, Idnurm A, Heitman J, Ausubel FM, Diener A. Galleria mellonella as a model system to study Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3842–3850. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.3842-3850.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nagarajan VK, Jones CI, Newbury SF, Green PJ. XRN 5’→3' exoribonucleases: structure, mechanisms and functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1829:590–603. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ni L, Feretzaki M, Li W, Floyd-Averette A, Mieczkowski P, Dietrich FS, Heitman J. Unisexual and heterosexual meiotic reproduction generates phenotypic and genotypic diversity de novo in Cryptococcus neoformans involving aneuploidy. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Panepinto J, Liu L, Ramos J, Zhu X, Valyi-Nagy T, Eksi S, Fu J, Jaffe HA, Wickes BL, Williamson PR. The DEAD-box RNA helicase Vad1 regulates multiple virulence-associated genes in Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:632–641. doi: 10.1172/JCI200523048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Park BJ, Wannemuehler KA, Marston BJ, Govender N, Pappas PG, Chiller TM. Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2009;23:525–530. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328322ffac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Park YD, Panepinto J, Shin S, Larsen P, Giles S, Williamson PR. Mating pheromone in Cryptococcus neoformans is regulated by a transcriptional/degradative “futile” cycle. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:34746–34756. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.136812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perfect JR. Cryptococcus neoformans: the yeast that likes it hot. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:463–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Robert VA, Casadevall A. Vertebrate endothermy restricts most fungi as potential pathogens. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1623–1626. doi: 10.1086/644642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sherman F. In: Getting started with yeast. Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. Guthrie C, Fink GR, editors. Vol. 194. Academic Press; San Diego: 1992. pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sheth U, Parker R. Decapping and decay of messenger RNA occur in cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science. 2003;300:805–808. doi: 10.1126/science.1082320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Solinger JA, Pascolini D. Active-site mutations in the Xrn1p exoribonuclease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal a specific role in meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:5930–5942. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.9.5930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Steen BR, Lian T, Zuyderduyn S, MacDonald WK, Marra M, Jones SJM, Kronstad JW. Temperature-regulated transcription in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genome Res. 2002;12:1386–1400. doi: 10.1101/gr.80202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun M, Schwalb B, Pirkl N, Maier KC, A. S, Failmezger H, Tresch A, Cramer P. Global analysis of eukaryotic mRNA degradation reveals Xrn1-dependent buffering of transcript levels. Mol Cell. 2013;52:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sweet T, Kovalak C, Coller J. The DEAD-box protein Dhh1 promotes decapping by slowing ribosome movement. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vecchiarelli A, Monari C. Capsular material of Cryptococcus neoformans: virulence and much more. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:375–386. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9513-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Walton FJ, Idnurm A, Heitman J. Novel gene functions required for melanization of the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:1381–1396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang L, Lin X. Mechanisms of unisexual mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48:651–660. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Warnecke T, J.L. P, Hurst LD. Finding exonic islands in a sea of non-coding sequence: splicing related constraints on protein composition and evolution are common in intron-rich genomes. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wickes BL, Edman JC. The Cryptococcus neoformans GAL7 gene and its use as an inducible promoter. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:1099–1109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Williamson PR. Laccase and melanin in the pathogenesis of Cryptococcus neoformans. Front Biosci. 1997;2:e99–e107. doi: 10.2741/a231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zaragoza O, Casadevall A. Experimental modulation of capsule size in Cryptococcus neoformans. Biol. Proced. Online. 2004;6:10–15. doi: 10.1251/bpo68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhu X, Williamson PR. Role of laccase in the biology and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004;5:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table A 2
Supplemental figures and table

Figure A.1: Deletion of XRN1 leads to changes in the capsule structure. Dotblot analysis of the capsule structure. Serial dilutions of cell suspensions of serotype D WT and xrn1Δ mutant cells were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with antibody E1.

Figure A.2. Multiplex PCR analysis of mating progeny. 2 μL of PCR using primers and protocol described in (Ni et al. 2013) were loaded on a 1.8 % agarose gel.

Figure A.3. Additional growth phenotypes of xrn1Δ strains. Serial dilutions of cells were spotted onto different media. Pictures were taken after 4 days.

RESOURCES