Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Feb 6;39(4):591. doi: 10.1111/acer.12661

Moving the Alcohol Addiction RDoC Forward

Kenneth J Sher 1
PMCID: PMC4383681  NIHMSID: NIHMS653934  PMID: 25656554

Litten et al. (in press) lay out an important research agenda for advancing personalized treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs), extending the RDoC framework (Cuthbert, 2014) to address alcohol and addiction constructs. Current diagnostic approaches (e.g., DSM-5, American Psychiatric Association, 2013), tell us little about the specific nature of a given individual's disorder or what underlying components to address in treatment. By identifying specific mechanisms that are causing or maintaining AUDs and by targeting them with interventions designed to normalize or stabilize those mechanisms, we should be able to develop novel treatments and to employ existing ones more effectively. As noted by Litten et al., it will also enhance our ability to identify patients with complex syndromes involving multiple dysfunctions and rationally implement combined interventions (e.g., polypharmacy, combined behavioral therapies) involving multiple targets and inform our understanding of comorbidities and their treatment.

Actualizing this vision requires basic research that continues to map the overlap and boundaries among dissociable (e.g., allostasis, incentive-sensitization, habit, response inhibition) yet interrelated (e.g., Lovic et al., 2011) mechanisms. Ultimately, we should be able to translate these mechanisms into tractable clinical assessments that can guide clinical decision-making. This will require considerably more work on measure development. Although much progress has been made in assessing both approach and inhibitory processes associated with addiction (e.g., Stacy & Wiers, 2010), many of these measures’ psychometrics indicates further refinement is necessary for reliable and valid application. Even venerable, “tried and true” measures of response inhibition (e.g., go/no-go, stop-signal, anti-saccade tasks) often correlate poorly with each other and have questionable psychometrics (Fillmore & Weafer, 2013). Consequently, improving basic, objective measurement (including both behavioral and biological markers) of key processes will increase the likelihood that the Alcohol Addiction RDoC initiative will fulfill its considerable promise for advancing addiction research and improving patient care.

Acknowledgements

The author's effort is supported, in part, by NIH Grant K05AA017242

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Author; Washington, DC: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuthbert BN. The RDOC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:28–35. doi: 10.1002/wps.20087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fillmore MT, Weafer J. Behavioral inhibition and addiction. In: MacKillop J, de Wit H, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Addiction Psychopharmacology. John Wiley and Sons Limited; West Sussex, UK: 2013. pp. 135–164. [Google Scholar]
  4. Litten RA, Ryan ML, Falk DE, Reilly M, Fertig JB, Koob GF. Heterogeneity of Alcohol Use Disorder: Understanding Mechanisms to Advance Personalized Treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. doi: 10.1111/acer.12669. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE. Rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues are also prone to impulsive action. Behav Brain Res. 2011;223:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stacy AW, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:551–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES