Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Apr 2;3(2):e00233-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00233-15

Genome Sequence of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum Strain MS-1

Matthew D Smalley 1, Georgi K Marinov 1, L Elizabeth Bertani 1, Gilberto DeSalvo 1,
PMCID: PMC4384492  PMID: 25838488

Abstract

Here, we report the genome sequence of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum strain MS-1, which consists of of 36 contigs and 4,136 protein-coding genes.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum strain MS-1 (1) is an alphaproteobacterial representative of magnetotactic bacteria. Magnetotactic bacteria are a unique group of prokaryotes characterized by their ability to orient themselves along the lines of a magnetic field (magnetotaxis), conferred by the presence of specialized organelles called magnetosomes (2, 3). Magnetosomes are a rare example of a lipid-bounded intracellular organelle in prokaryotes and are of great interest both from a purely biological perspective and because of their numerous potential technological applications (4, 5).

An assembly of the MS-1 genome was previously deposited in GenBank (assembly ID GCA_000166875.1). However, the annotation of that assembly revealed that it is heavily contaminated with sequences from an unidentified Methylobacter strain. It contains two sets of rRNAs, one of which is a best match to Methylobacterium rRNAs, and >60% of the predicted open reading frames (ORFs) also had a best match in the genome of one of the sequenced Methylobacterium strains. We therefore carried out de novo whole-genome sequencing of the MS-1 strain. We generated ~1,000× coverage of the MS-1 genome using 2 × 150-bp Illumina HiSeq reads, with an average fragment length of ~700 bp. The reads were error corrected using BayesHammer (6) and assembled using SPAdes (version 3.1.1) (7), IDBA (version 1.1.1) (8), and Edena (version 3.131028) (9). Contigs with a coverage of ≤200× and length ≤200 bp were filtered out, and the assemblies were merged with CISA (version 1.3) (10). After filtering out potential contaminants (i.e., contigs that were close matches to the human and other eukaryotic genome sequences), the final assembly consists of 4,523,935 bp in 36 contigs, with an N50 of 541,957 and N90 of 102,810. The largest contig is 1,344,907 bp in length, and the G+C content is 63.5%.

The annotation of protein-coding genes was carried out using RAST (11). Ribosomal RNAs were annotated using RNAmmer 1.2 (12), and tRNAscan-SE (version 1.21) (13) was used to find tRNA genes. Additional noncoding RNA genes and elements were annotated using Infernal (version 1.1.1) (14) and the Rfam database (version 12.0) (15).

A total of 4,136 protein-coding genes, 48 tRNAs, and a single set of rRNAs were predicted. The vast majority of the genes have their best BLAST match in the genomes of related magnetotactic bacteria, such as Magnetospirillum sp. strain AMB-1, indicating the absence of contamination in the assembly.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. JXSL00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JXSL01000000. The raw sequencing reads are available from the Short Read Archive under the accession no. SRR1765663.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Millard and Muriel Jacobs Genetics and Genomics Laboratory and the Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, located at the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.

Footnotes

Citation Smalley MD, Marinov GK, Bertani LE, DeSalvo G. 2015. Genome sequence of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum strain MS-1. Genome Announc 3(2):e00233-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00233-15

REFERENCES

  • 1.Maratea D, Blakemore RP. 1981. Aquaspirillum magnetotacticum sp. nov., a magnetic Spirillum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 31:452–455. doi: 10.1099/00207713-31-4-452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blakemore R. 1975. Magnetotactic bacteria. Science 190:377–379. doi: 10.1126/science.170679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blakemore RP. 1982. Magnetotactic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 36:217–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.36.100182.001245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alphandéry E. 2014. Applications of magnetosomes synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria and magnetosomes in medicine: a mini-review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2:5. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lefèvre CT, Wu LF. 2013. Evolution of the bacterial organelle responsible for magnetotaxis. Trends Microbiol 21:534–543. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nikolenko SI, Korobeynikov AI, Alekseyev MA. 2013. BayesHammer: Bayesian clustering for error correction in single-cell sequencing. BMC Genomics 14(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S1-S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelsky A, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, McLean J, Lasken R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads, p 158–170. In Deng M, Jiang R, Sun F, Zhang X (ed), Research in computational molecular biology, vol 7821 Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. 2010. IDBA—a practical iterative de Bruijn graph de novo assembler, p 426–440. In Berger B. (ed), Research in computational molecular biology, vol 6044 Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hernandez D, François P, Farinelli L, Østerås M, Schrenzel J. 2008. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res 18:802–809. doi: 10.1101/gr.072033.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin S-H, Liao Y-C. 2013. CISA: contig integrator for sequence assembly of bacterial genomes. PLoS One 8:e60843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS Web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W686–W689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. 2013. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29:2933–2935. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burge SW, Daub J, Eberhardt R, Tate J, Barquist L, Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR, Gardner PP, Bateman A. 2013. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D226–D232. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES