Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2015 Mar 5;6(3):e1667. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.590

Lack of gp130 expression in hepatocytes attenuates tumor progression in the DEN model

M Hatting 1,3, M Spannbauer 1,3, J Peng 1,3, M Al Masaoudi 1, G Sellge 1, Y A Nevzorova 1, N Gassler 1, C Liedtke 1, F J Cubero 1,4,*, C Trautwein 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC4385909  PMID: 25741592

Abstract

Chronic liver inflammation is a crucial event in the development and growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compelling evidence has shown that interleukin-6 (IL-6)/gp130-dependent signaling has a fundamental role in liver carcinogenesis. Thus, in the present study we aimed to investigate the role of gp130 in hepatocytes for the initiation and progression of HCC. Hepatocyte-specific gp130 knockout mice (gp130Δhepa) and control animals (gp130f/f) were treated with diethylnitrosamine (DEN). The role of gp130 for acute injury (0–144 h post treatment), tumor initiation (24 weeks) and progression (40 weeks) was analyzed. After acute DEN-induced liver injury we observed a reduction in the inflammatory response in gp130Δhepa animals as reflected by decreased levels of IL-6 and oncostatin M. The loss of gp130 slightly attenuated the initiation of HCC 24 weeks after DEN treatment. In contrast, 40 weeks after DEN treatment, male and female gp130Δhepa mice showed smaller tumors and reduced tumor burden, indicating a role for hepatocyte-specific gp130 expression during HCC progression. Oxidative stress and DNA damage were substantially and similarly increased by DEN in both gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa animals. However, gp130Δhepa livers revealed aberrant STAT5 activation and decreased levels of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), pSMAD2/3 and SMAD2, whereas phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705 and Ser727 was absent. Our results indicate that gp130 deletion in hepatocytes reduces progression, but not HCC initiation in the DEN model. Gp130 deletion resulted in STAT3 inhibition but increased STAT5 activation and diminished TGF-dependent signaling. Hence, blocking gp130 in hepatocytes might be an interesting therapeutic target to inhibit the growth of HCC.


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major health problem as it ranks fifth among the solid tumors and third among the worldwide cause of cancer mortality in males with half a million deaths per year.1, 2 The development of HCC is a multifactorial process that includes the accumulation of mutations in the cellular tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting pathways as well as a disturbance in immune surveillance. It involves the transition of a normal cell to a preneoplastic lesion that develops into a malignant tumor. The driving pathophysiological mechanisms by which tumor initiation and progression occur during the process of hepatic carcinogenesis needs to be explored to target pathways, which are attractive for therapeutic intervention.

The progression of chronic liver disease and, at the end stage, the growth of HCC is associated with persistent tissue injury, leading to a chronic inflammatory response in the organ reflected by an imbalance in pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines.3, 4, 5 Members of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) family such as IL-6, oncostatin M (OSM), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and cardiotrophin share the glycoprotein 130 (gp130) for signal transduction. Gp130 has been shown to have a fundamental role in the development, hematopoiesis, cell survival and growth as well as in infection, immunity and inflammation.3, 6 Especially, molecular studies of IL-6 dependent gp130 activation have significantly contributed to the understanding of the role of gp130 during infection and inflammation.7

Binding of IL-6 to the IL-6 receptor (IL-6Rα) causes a heterodimeric association with gp130 to form a signaling complex composed of a gp130 homodimer and two IL-6Rα molecules which, in turn, trigger the phosphorylation and activation of the JAK-STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) pathway initiating gene transcription.7, 8, 9, 10 We and others have previously demonstrated the relevance of gp130 in regulating cellular recruitment to local sites of inflammation.7, 11, 12, 13 In addition, there is good evidence that gp130 might have a role in cancer, as elevated IL-6 levels are associated with higher risk of developing certain tumors.14

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of gp130 in hepatocytes for the initiation and progression of HCC during inflammation-triggered carcinogenesis. We thus used the diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced HCC model which recapitulates human HCC with poor prognosis14, 15 and addressed the role of gp130 in DEN-induced tumorigenesis by using animals with hepatocyte-specific gp130 deletion.

Results

Acute inflammation is ameliorated in gp130Δhepa mice

To investigate the role of gp130 for immediate, tumor-initiating events, gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa mice were subjected to high-dose DEN injection (200 mg/kg i.p.) and killed up to 144 h after treatment (Figure 1a–f). Pathological examination of the H&E sections evidenced pericentral foci of small dysplastic hepatocytes and the presence of inflammatory cells observable 24 h after DEN stimulation in both groups (Figure 1a,Supplementary Figure 1). However, periportal necrosis and inflammatory cells were more pronounced in gp130f/f compared with gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 1a,Supplementary Figure 1). Consistently, FACS analysis showed significantly reduced infiltration of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) and a tendency for a decreased number of inflammatory monocytes in livers of gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f animals 72 h after DEN treatment (Figure 1b and c), whereas the numbers of hepatic T, B, and NK cells were unchanged (Supplementary Figure 2a and c). Moreover, 24 h after DEN treatment, myeloperoxidase activity (MPO), a marker for PMN recruitment, was slightly attenuated (P=0.51) in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f animals in liver tissue homogenates (Figure 1d).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Acute DEN treatment, periportal foci and immune infiltration in hepatocyte-specific gp130 knockout mice. Gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa animals were treated with a single i.p. injection of DEN and killed at the indicated time-points. (a) Representative H&E staining of the liver sections (untreated, 24 and 72 h) (upper panel). Dotted areas in yellow represent necrotic foci. Dotted areas in green represent infiltration. Liver infiltrating PMN (b) and inflammatory monocytes (c) in 24 and 72 h DEN-treated gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa mice were analyzed with FACS, and quantified and represented using FlowJo. Total liver was extracted and MPO (d) was performed. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) (e) and serum aspartate transaminase (AST) (f) levels were determined in gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f mice after DEN treatment at different time points ranging 0–144 h. All graphs show mean+SEM (n=5, *P<0.05; ***P<0.001).

Concomitant with these observations, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in gp130Δhepa mice were reduced at several time points after DEN treatment (Figure 1e and f) compared with the gp130f/f control group. DNA damage induced by ROS has been widely accepted as a major trigger of hepatocarcinogenesis. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX has been used as an important indicator of DNA damage.16, 17 Indeed, pH2AX after DNA damage has been shown to be a major determinant for cell fate.17, 18 Phosphorylation of H2AX (pH2AX) was markedly increased after DEN treatment. However, we could not detect a significant difference 24 h after DEN treatment between gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 2a and b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Immunofluorescence for pH2AX on frozen liver sections 24 h after DEN treatment was performed. (b) Quantification of the positive cells – indicating DNA double strand breaks – was carried out. Protein lysates were extracted from livers treated with DEN for 24 h, and IL-6 (c) and OSM (d) levels were determined. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6, *P<0.05; ***P<0.001).

As we found histological differences in the inflammatory milieu of the DEN-treated livers, we examined the IL-6 protein levels in the liver (Figure 2c). IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine, which is involved in controlling the acute phase response during inflammation.19, 20 IL-6 protein levels were reduced in gp130Δhepacompared with gp130f/flivers from 24 to 144 h post treatment reaching significance at the 24, 48 and 96 h time points (Figure 2c). OSM and LIF are further members of the IL-6 cytokine family, which signal through the gp130 receptor. The protein expression of OSM was significantly higher in gp130f/f compared with gp130Δhepa livers, 72 h after DEN (Figure 2d) and after 40 weeks of DEN treatment (Supplementary Figure 3a). No differences were observed in LIF expression (data not shown). As gp130-driven IL-11 expression has been found to be overexpressed in inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma (IHCA),21 we studied whether the levels of IL-11 were affected in liver gp130-abrogated mice (Supplementary Figure 3b). Our results show a tendency toward reduced IL-11, especially 24 h and 48 h after acute DEN treatment.

HCC initiation in gp130Δhepa livers

We next investigated the impact of gp130 on tumor initiation 24 weeks after a single dose of DEN injection (25 mg/kg) in male mice. Dysplastic nodules were present in all animals killed at the 24 week time point. Lesions did not show differences in terms of appearance and localization in both groups (Figure 3a, left panel). Despite a lack of significant differences in the numbers of liver nodules, a quantitative macroscopic examination displayed a nodule diameters in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers 24 weeks after DEN stimulation (Figure 3a, right panel). In addition, both the total nodule area and the number of nodules per area were smaller in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers. However, these parameters did not reach statistical significance at this early time point after tumor initiation (Supplementary Figure 4a). Moreover, less visible nodules on the liver surface at the time point of explantation were found in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers (Supplementary Figure 4b). Altogether, these results suggested that the loss of gp130 does not affect tumor initiation but slightly attenuated early progression of HCC after DEN-induced tumor initiation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Tumor initiation in gp130Δhepa livers. Male gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa animals were treated with a single i.p. injection of DEN and were killed after 24 weeks. (a) Representative macroscopic views of the livers and the number of nodules found in these livers are shown (dotted circles represent dysplastic nodules; left panel). (b) H&E staining was carried out on the same livers and different magnifications are shown. Nodules of random H&E slides were analyzed by an experienced pathologist in a blinded session for tumor diameter. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=5, *P<0.05).

Ablation of gp130 in hepatocytes reduces HCC progression in male and female mice

After single low-dose DEN treatment, macroscopic HCC formation typically occurs between 35 and 52 weeks.22 We thus investigated tumor progression in male gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa livers 40 weeks after DEN injection (Figure 4). Macroscopically, tumor nodules were evident in both gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 4a). However, the number of nodules and tumor fraction in gp130Δhepa livers was significantly reduced compared with gp130f/f animals at this time point (Figure 4a–c,Supplementary Figure 5a). Furthermore, these findings were associated with a reduction in tumor nodules on the surface of DEN-treated gp130Δhepa livers and a clear tendency in the cumulative diameter (Supplementary Figure 5b and c), whereas the liver versus body weight ratio did not show statistical difference between gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f mice (Supplementary Figure 5d). Consistent with these data, immunofluorescence staining of frozen tissue evidenced a tendency for reduction of CD11b+- cell infiltration and F4/80+-positive staining in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers as a sign of tumor-associated inflammation, 40 weeks after DEN induction (Supplementary Figure 6a and b). Altogether our findings show that gp130 in hepatocytes is involved in HCC progression.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ablation of gp130 in hepatocytes reduces HCC progression in males. Male gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa mice were treated with a single i.p. DEN injection and killed 40 weeks later. (a) Representative macroscopic views of the livers are shown (dotted circles represent dysplastic nodules; left panel). H&E staining was performed from the same livers and photographed at different magnifications (center and right panel). (b) Tumors of randomly chosen H&E slides were counted by an experienced pathologist in a blinded session. Total area of the liver section was measured and results calculated as tumors per cm2 of liver section. (c) The total area of the section and the area of the tumor were measured. Tumor area was calculated as the percentage of total. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=5; *P<0.05; **P<0.01).

To determine whether the previously reported gender bias in IL-6 production that accounts for the sex difference in HCC development in these animals,14 we examined DEN-induced carcinogenesis in female gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa livers, 40 weeks after DEN treatment. Macroscopical examination of liver specimens manifested smaller nodules in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f female mice (Figure 5a, upper panel). Further examination of H&E showed presence of visible HCC areas in gp130f/f female mice (Figure 5a, left panel). In contrast, gp130Δhepa female livers displayed normal liver architecture with the presence of some preneoplastic cells (Figure 5a, right panel). Consistent with these findings, there was a tendency for a reduction in the number of tumors (P=0.21) and the tumor fraction (P=0.09) in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f females, 40 weeks after DEN (Figure 5b and c). Therefore, from these results, we cannot exclude the possibility that besides IL-6 other factors may also contribute to gender disparity in liver cancer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Disruption of gp130 in hepatocytes in females attenuates HCC progression. Gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa female mice were treated with a single i.p. DEN injection and killed 40 weeks later. (a) Representative macroscopic views of the livers are shown (dotted circles represent dysplastic nodules, upper panel). H&E staining was performed from the same livers and photographed at different magnifications (left and right panels). (b, c) The number of nodules and the tumor area were determined by an experienced pathologist in a blinded session and represented. Tumor area was calculated as the percentage of total. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6; *P<0.05; **P<0.01).

ROS-dependent DNA damage is an important driver of liver injury after DEN treatment

Maintenance of genome stability after DNA damage depends on BRCA1.23 We observed that 40 weeks after DEN administration BRCA1 mRNA expression was significantly elevated in DEN-induced gp130f/f tumor tissue compared with gp130Δhepa livers, suggesting a reduced amount of DNA double-strand breaks in gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 6a). This was associated with a tendency toward reduced levels of pH2AX in gp130Δhepa livers, 40 weeks after DEN treatment, although the observed differences did not reach statistical significance (Figure 6b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Oxidative stress plays an important role in liver injury after DEN treatment. (a) RNA was extracted from total liver lysates 40 weeks after DEN treatment and qRT PCR for BRCA-1 was performed. (b) Quantification of the pH2AX immunostaining of liver sections for pH2AX of gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f mice 40 weeks after DEN treatment is shown. Vehicle (saline) injected animals of both genotypes were used as controls. (c) Representative immunofluorescence of liver sections for dihydroethidium (DHE) of gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f mice 40 weeks after DEN treatment was assessed. Vehicle-injected animals of both genotypes served as controls. (d) Quantitative measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA) from total liver lysates of the same mice. Vehicle-injected animals of both genotypes served as controls. Data are expressed as mean+SEM (n=5; **P<0.01).

Oxygen-derived species such as superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, single oxygen and hydroxyl radicals have been implicated in the etiology, the initiation and the progression of HCC.24 Immunofluorescence staining of liver cryosections with dihydroethidium (DHE) revealed higher amounts of superoxide radicals in both gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f livers compared with untreated controls 40 weeks after DEN injection (Figure 6c). Furthermore, our data evidenced that liver malondialdehyde levels were not significantly changed between both groups, indicating that potential changes in overall ROS production and lipid peroxidation were not a major cause to explain differences in tumor progression (Figure 6d).

Impaired STAT3 phosphorylation is associated with increased STAT5 activation and abrogated TGF-β signaling in gp130Δhepa livers

In the mouse model, STAT3 was shown to be essential for DEN-induced carcinogenesis.25 Compelling molecular evidence has demonstrated a role for STAT3 in tumor initiation and progression.19, 26, 27 In line with these previous findings, STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705 and Ser727 was evident in gp130f/f livers 40 weeks after DEN injection. As expected, pSTAT3 expression was strongly inhibited in gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 7a, Supplementary Figure 7a and b). Noticeably, phosphorylation of serine 727 (Ser727) has been linked with neoplastic transformation of hepatocytes and also contributes to the maximal transcriptional activity of STAT3.28

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Lack of gp130 in hepatocytes is associated with STAT5 activation 40 weeks after DEN treatment. Protein levels of pTyr705 STAT3 and pSer727 STAT3 (a) and pSTAT5 (b) were determined by western blot of total liver protein lysates of 40 weeks-DEN-treated gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa animals. As controls, untreated animals were used. GAPDH was used as loading control. (c) RNA was extracted from total liver lysates after 40 weeks of DEN treatment and qRT-PCR for TGFβ was performed. (d) Protein levels of pSMAD2/3, SMAD2 and SMAD7 were determined by western blot in the same samples. Differences in MAPK/Ras signaling in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers. (e) Protein levels of pAKT and pERK were determined by western blot of total liver protein lysates of 40 weeks-DEN-treated gp130f/f and gp130Δhepa animals. As controls, untreated animals were used. GAPDH was used as loading control. Loading control was the same for pSTAT5 and pERK as both were developed on the same membrane. Graphs show mean±SEM (n=3; *P<0.05).

A recent study has suggested that STAT5 might have a crucial role in hepatic tumorigenesis.29 However, its role in cancer development is still controversial as it might also act as a tumor inducer30, 31, 32, 33 as well as a tumor suppressor.29, 34 No STAT5 activation was detected in gp130f/f livers 40 weeks after DEN treatment (Figure 7b, Supplementary Figure 7c). However, increased STAT5 phosphorylation was evident in gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 7b, Supplementary Figure 7c).

Earlier results suggested a correlation between enhanced STAT3 and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling in contrast to lower STAT5 activation during growth of HCC.35 Thus, we examined whether TGFβ activation was different in gp130Δhepa livers. In fact, 40 weeks after DEN treatment TGFβ expression was significantly increased in gp130f/f compared with gp130Δhepa livers (Figure 7c, Supplementary Figure 7d).

The SMAD protein family is frequently mutated or deleted in human cancers. In gp130f/f livers, SMAD2/3 were strongly phosphorylated 40 weeks after DEN treatment, consistent with the elevated TGFβ expression found in these livers (Figures 7c and d, Supplementary Figure 7d). Mutations in the SMAD2 gene have a relatively high occurrence in liver cancer, and overexpression of SMAD7 has been also reported in HCC patients.36 Indeed, the mutant Smads are degraded rapidly in comparison with their wild-type counterparts.37 Whereas the SMAD7 expression was not changed in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers, SMAD2 protein expression was downregulated in the same experimental conditions (Figure 7d,Supplementary Figures 7e and f). Thus, TGFβ-mediated signaling pathways are attenuated in gp130Δhepa livers.

Differences in MAPK/Ras signaling in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers

Finally, we investigated whether changes in STAT/TGFβ signaling might have an impact on MAPK-dependent pathways and thus evaluated pAKT and pERK expression. Forty weeks after DEN injection pAKT and pERK expression were slightly increased in gp130Δhepa compared with gp130f/f livers (Figure 7e, Supplementary Figures 7g and h).

Discussion

HCC is the most common primary malignancy in the liver and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide because of the lack of effective treatment options.38, 39, 40 To improve the current understanding of the mechanisms of hepatic carcinogenesis, the DEN model has frequently been used to define at the molecular level HCC initiation and progression in mice,22 as it recapitulates the pathophysiological events of human HCC.15 DEN induces carcinogenesis by covalent binding and methylation of nucleic acids and proteins in hepatocytes leading to HCC development.22

The link between inflammation, cancer and gp130 has been well characterized in gastric and colorectal cancer.41, 42 Several observations have identified gp130-associated cytokines as key players in the pathophysiology of tumor initiation and progression. Among these studies, an increased IL-6 expression has been linked with HCC development.38, 43 Specifically, activation of IL-6 signaling through phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705 and Ser727 has been detected in a wide variety of mouse and human liver cancer including IHCA.28, 43, 44, 45, 46 Especially in IHCA, dominant-active mutational changes in different proteins contributing to gp130-STAT3 activation are essential to lead toward benign tumor growth.43 However, the transition of IHCA into HCC and thus tumor initiation is not frequently found.47

In the present study, we observed a reduction in the DEN-induced HCC load in gp130Δhepa livers. IL-6 signaling can promote tumor initiation and progression by activating multiple intracellular signaling pathways.46 Among those, STAT3 activation seems crucial to trigger carcinogenesis.48 In earlier studies, we contributed to define the role of IL-6 or STAT3 for liver injury.11, 12 In the present work, we addressed the relevance of the hepatocyte-specific role of gp130 for liver carcinogenesis.

Our experimental approach using conditional knockout mice presents more advantages than global mutants such as IL-6−/− in which the effect of changes in tumor growth cannot be attributed to a specific cell-type. Here, activation of IL-6-dependent pathways in different cell types – especially immune cells and non-parenchymal liver cells – can also contribute to HCC development.49 The use of STAT3-cell-type-specific knockout mice bears limitations as gp130, the signaling molecule, is still expressed in the targeted cell. It has been shown that the intracellular gp130 docking sites are not STAT3 specific.21 Hence, ligand binding to the gp130 receptor also induces STAT1 activation, which has specific effects, potentially affecting the outcome of the experiments. In addition, gp130 activates other signaling cascades, and STAT3 deletion might alter receptor stoichiometry, favoring the activation of alternative pathways.

As Williams et al.50 reported that the cytotoxicity caused by injection of DEN is dose-dependent, we first performed dose–response experiments to investigate if the loss of gp130 in hepatocytes might have a role in tumor initiation and progression. We have previously shown that the lack of gp130 promotes susceptibility to LPS-induced acute liver injury.11 Our results indicated that the acute inflammatory response after DEN administration was ameliorated in mice with ablation of gp130 in hepatocytes. Interestingly, we found that OSM, a member of the IL-6 cytokine family, was downregulated in gp130Δhepa livers, which is in agreement with previous observations that strongly link OSM to inflammation and tumorigenesis.51 Therefore, we asked whether these differences might be relevant to explain changes in DEN-induced tumor initiation.

We found significantly reduced dysplastic tissue area fraction and nodule size in gp130Δhepa livers 24 weeks after DEN injection. However, the number of nodules in gp130Δhepa livers was not significantly decreased at this time point, time point suggesting that the differences observed after acute DEN injection likely have no impact on tumor initiation.

As these results indicated that gp130Δhepa had a minor effect on tumor initiation, we next investigated the role of gp130 for tumor progression (40 weeks post DEN). Here, we found that phosphorylation of STAT3 at both Tyr705 and Ser727 was abrogated in livers of gp130Δhepa mice. Our findings imply that gp130 in hepatocytes is a main mediator for STAT3 activation in tumors having a significant impact on tumor progression.

Naugler et al.14 attributed the disparity in liver cancer between females and males to differences in IL-6 production by Kupffer cells in response to DEN. Accordingly, female WT mice had a much lower HCC incidence after DEN treatment compared with males, which was not the case in a IL-6−/− background. It has therefore been suggested that disruption of IL-6 signaling would abolish the gender disparity in liver cancer at least in the murine DEN model.14

Interestingly, in our study we found that disruption of gp130 in hepatocytes also conferred some protection against DEN-induced HCC in female mice although these differences were not statistically significant owing to high variation within the animals. However, we did not observe strong differences regarding tumor incidence in our cohort of wild-type females 40 weeks after DEN. Altogether, from our own data we cannot exclude the possibility that besides IL-6, other factors may also contribute to gender disparity in liver cancer. This conclusion is in agreement with previous work published by the group of Klaus Kaestner52 and others,36, 47, 53 diminishing the enthusiasm about a therapeutic use of estrogens in the clinic.

The changes in tumor progression were associated with a significant reduction in the expression of several gp130 target genes. Interestingly, we could not detect any differences in oxidative stress or immune cell infiltration between gp130Δhepa and gp130f/f mice, factors that are known to be associated with cancer progression.54 Therefore, we searched for an alternative mechanism that could mediate this effect.

DNA damage has an important role in tumor growth of DEN-induced carcinogenesis. DNA-repair mechanisms, such as non-homologous end joining, recombination repair and base excision repair, counter-act the mutagenic effect of DEN.55 However, no significant differences in DNA damage were found after acute DEN-induced injury using different doses. In fact, after 24 weeks of treatment with DEN, we only observed a tendency toward reduced DNA damage. Nevertheless, DNA repair depends on BRCA1,23 which was significantly diminished in gp130Δhepa mice. Thus, these results suggest that the degree of DNA damage directly after DEN injection is not significantly altered by the lack of gp130 expression.

In search of potential mechanisms explaining reduced HCC progression in gp130Δhepa mice, we found increased STAT5 phosphorylation in gp130Δhepa liver. As STAT5 activation has been shown to trigger tumor growth in a TGFβ-dependent manner,29 we examined the TGFβ pathway in more detail. We found significantly decreased TGFβ expression in gp130Δhepa livers associated with reduced protein levels of SMAD2 and pSMAD2/3. TGFβ1 has been detected in blood and urine of patients with HCC, and its presence is associated with poor prognosis.56 Our data therefore suggest that attenuated TGFβ signaling contributes to reduced HCC progression in gp130Δhepa livers after DEN injection. However, even though the interplay between STAT3 and STAT5 has been described in the literature,57, 58 it remains unclear how loss of STAT3 activity leads to STAT5 activation.

IL-6/STAT3 activity often correlates with tumorigenesis and poor prognosis in humans, processes which are linked to the gp130-signaling pathway.3 Moreover, somatic mutations coding for constitutively activated gp130 have been detected in hepatocellular adenoma.43 Indeed, clinical trials with IL-6 antibodies have shown good antitumor efficacy leading, yet, massive systemic elevations in IL-6. To overcome this problem, drugs which prevent binding of IL-6 to IL-6 R, or IL-6 neutralizing antibodies are currently under investigation. However, the major hurdle here is to overcome the global IL-6 blockade caused by these drugs. To achieve this goal, a possible therapeutic strategy solution has been recently published by Bartneck et al.,49 with the use of gold nanorods, which represent a relatively novel class of nanoparticles that hold significant potential for delivering drugs such as gp130-signaling pathway blockers to specific cell types (e.g., hepatocytes).

We conclude that gp130 in hepatocytes contributes to tumor progression but not to tumor initiation in the DEN model. In the presence of gp130 in hepatocytes, DEN induces IL-6 and OSM signaling through gp130-activating STAT3, TGFβ-dependent pathways and HCC progression. Conversely, the absence of gp130 in hepatocytes results in decreased IL-6 and OSM expression, constitutive phosphorylation of STAT5 and subsequently impaired TGFβ-dependent signaling, thereby attenuating HCC development (Figure 8). Thus, gp130 in hepatocytes seems an interesting therapeutic target for blocking progression of HCC.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Gp130 in hepatocytes contributes to tumor progression in the DEN model. In the presence of gp130 in hepatocytes, DEN induces IL-6 and OSM signaling through gp130 activating STAT3, TGFb-dependent pathways and HCC progression. The absence of gp130 in hepatocytes results in decreased IL-6 and OSM signaling and constitutive phosphorylation of STAT5 occurs, which impairs TGFb-dependent mechanisms, thus attenuating HCC development.

Materials and methods

Animals and induction of tumorigenesis

For our study, we used gp130f/f mice in a C57BL/6 background. In these mice, exon 16 encoding the gp130 transmembrane domains is flanked by loxP sites as described previously.59 Gp130f/f mice were crossed with transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinases under control of the albumin promoter/enhancer and the α-fetoprotein enhancer as previously described,12 resulting in gp130Δhepa mice with specific deletion of gp130 in liver parenchymal cells (hepatocytes and cholangiocytes). Mice were housed in 12-h light/dark cycles, with free access to food and water and were treated in accordance with the criteria of the German administrative panel on laboratory animal care and approved by the local Animal Care Committee. At least five animals per time point were analyzed. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Male and female mice were injected intraperitoneally with 200 mg/kg body weight (time points 0–144 h) or 25 mg/kg body weight (time points 24–40 weeks) of DEN (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) at 14 days of age. Mice were killed at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h or 24 and 42 weeks after injection, respectively. Vehicle-injected (saline) 44-week-old male mice served as controls. All animals were injected within a time period of 3 months with the same DEN lot, ensuring best comparability between treated groups.

Analysis of liver tumors

Each liver lobe was separately photographed with the Leica Z16 APO macroscope from every side. Tumor formations >1 mm in diameter were counted and measured using the calibrated Diskus software (Hilgers, Königswinter, Germany). Conventional Haematoxyline & Eosin (H&E) stainings were evaluated for signs of malignancies, and malignant areas were measured using the Diskus software in a blinded session.

Gene expression analysis

Liver tissue was shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. RNA was purified by pegGOLD (peqLab, Erlangen, Germany) using standard protocols, and complementary DNA was generated from 1 mg RNA using a complementary DNA synthesis kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Quantitative real-time (RT-PCR was performed using SYBR green reagent (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) reactions were carried out twice in quintuples, and GAPDH values were used to normalize gene expression. Primer sequences are available on request.

Immunoblot analysis

Liver tissues were homogenized in ice-cold NP40-Buffer containing 50 mM Tri-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40 and 50 mM NaF freshly supplemented with Complete Mini (Roche), PhosSTOP (Roche), 1 mM orthovanadate and 1 mM pefablock. Protein concentrations were determined by BIO-RAD protein assay (BIO-RAD Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany). Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a cellulose membrane and probed with antibodies for pAKT, pERK, pTyr705 STAT3, pSer727 STAT3, pSTAT5, pJNK and pSMAD2/3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). As secondary antibodies, anti-rabbit-HRP (Cell Signaling) and antimouse-HRP (Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) were used. GAPDH from AbD SeroTec (Düsseldorf, Germany) was used as loading control. Analysis of intrahepatic IL-6 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and OSM (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was performed in duplicates (n=6) using a murine ELISA kit.

Immunofluorescence

For immunofluorescence staining, cryosections were fixed in 4% PFA for 10 min, rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-Tween for 10 min and blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h. Incubation with primary antibodies CD11b (BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany), F4/80 (MCA497, Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA), pH2AX (Cell Signaling) and DHE (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) was performed at 4 °C overnight. Slides were rinsed in PBS and incubated with appropriate fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies (AlexaFluor 488 and 564, Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed twice in TBS-Tween and mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Linaris, Wertheim, Germany). All sections were analyzed and documented using an Imager Z1 fluorescence microscope together with Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Flow cytometry analysis

Immune cells from whole liver were isolated as described recently54 and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (CD45, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Gr1, CD3, CD19, NK1.1, all BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) and HOECHST for live–dead differentiation. All samples were acquired by flow cytometry (FACS Canto II; BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, OR, USA). Gating strategies are shown in Supplementary Figure 3A and B.

Serum parameters

ALT and AST were measured in the Central Laboratory Facility at University Hospital RWTH Aachen according to standard procedures.

Statistical analysis

All experimental data are expressed as mean and error bars are shown as S.E.M. Differences between more than two groups were assessed by analysis of variance, and between two groups by two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test (GraphPad), except where indicated otherwise.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research and a START grant (#691405) within the Faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR/57), by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR/57) and the German Cancer Foundation (Deutsche Krebshilfe) Grant Nr. 107682.

Glossary

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

IL-6

interleukin-6

Gp130

glycoprotein 130

Gp130Δhepa

hepatocyte-specific gp130 knockout mice

Gp130f/f

Control floxed animals

DEN

diethylnitrosamine

H&E

haematoxyline & eosin (H&E)

PMN

polymorphonuclear neutrophil

IL-6Rα

interleukin-6 receptor alpha

OSM

oncostatin M

LIF

leukemia inhibitory factor

IL-11

interleukin-11

ROS

reactive oxygen species

DNA

deoxyribonucleic acid

H2AX

histone 2AX

MPO

myeloperoxidase activity

PMN

polymorphonuclear neutrophil

BRCA1

breast cancer 1, early onset

DHE

dihydroethidium

MDA

malondialdehyde

STAT

signal transducer and activator of transcription

TGFβ

transforming growth factor-β

JNK

c-Jun N-terminal kinase

ERK

extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1

G6P

glucose-6-phosphatase

IHCA

inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma

LPS

lipopolysaccharide.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis)

Edited by R Johnstone

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

References

  1. Severi T, van Malenstein H, Verslype C, van Pelt JF. Tumor initiation and progression in hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors, classification, and therapeutic targets. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 31:1409–1420. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones SA, Scheller J, Rose-John S. Therapeutic strategies for the clinical blockade of IL-6/gp130 signaling. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3375–3383. doi: 10.1172/JCI57158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldmann M. Development of anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:364–371. doi: 10.1038/nri802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McInnes IB, Schett G. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:429–442. doi: 10.1038/nri2094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoshida K, Taga T, Saito M, Suematsu S, Kumanogoh A, Tanaka T, et al. Targeted disruption of gp130, a common signal transducer for the interleukin 6 family of cytokines, leads to myocardial and hematological disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:407–411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Silver JS, Hunter CA. gp130 at the nexus of inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:1145–1156. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0410217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boulanger MJ, Chow DC, Brevnova EE, Garcia KC. Hexameric structure and assembly of the interleukin-6/IL-6 alpha-receptor/gp130 complex. Science. 2003;300:2101–2104. doi: 10.1126/science.1083901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stahl N, Boulton TG, Farruggella T, Ip NY, Davis S, Witthuhn BA, et al. Association and activation of Jak-Tyk kinases by CNTF-LIF-OSM-IL-6 beta receptor components. Science. 1994;263:92–95. doi: 10.1126/science.8272873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lutticken C, Wegenka UM, Yuan J, Buschmann J, Schindler C, Ziemiecki A, et al. Association of transcription factor APRF and protein kinase Jak1 with the interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130. Science. 1994;263:89–92. doi: 10.1126/science.8272872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Streetz KL, Wustefeld T, Klein C, Kallen KJ, Tronche F, Betz UA, et al. Lack of gp130 expression in hepatocytes promotes liver injury. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:532–543. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00901-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Streetz KL, Tacke F, Leifeld L, Wustefeld T, Graw A, Klein C, et al. Interleukin 6/gp130-dependent pathways are protective during chronic liver diseases. Hepatology. 2003;38:218–229. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sander LE, Obermeier F, Dierssen U, Kroy DC, Singh AK, Seidler U, et al. Gp130 signaling promotes development of acute experimental colitis by facilitating early neutrophil/macrophage recruitment and activation. J Immunol. 2008;181:3586–3594. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Naugler WE, Sakurai T, Kim S, Maeda S, Kim K, Elsharkawy AM, et al. Gender disparity in liver cancer due to sex differences in MyD88-dependent IL-6 production. Science. 2007;317:121–124. doi: 10.1126/science.1140485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee JS, Chu IS, Mikaelyan A, Calvisi DF, Heo J, Reddy JK, et al. Application of comparative functional genomics to identify best-fit mouse models to study human cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1306–1311. doi: 10.1038/ng1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 2005;123:1213–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang MA, So EY, Simons AL, Spitz DR, Ouchi T. DNA damage induces reactive oxygen species generation through the H2AX-Nox1/Rac1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e249. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cook PJ, Ju BG, Telese F, Wang X, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature. 2009;458:591–596. doi: 10.1038/nature07849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu Y, Fuchs J, Li C, Lin J. IL-6, a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: FLLL32 inhibits IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in human hepatocellular cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:3423–3427. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.17.12946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Feghali CA, Wright TM. Cytokines in acute and chronic inflammation. Front Biosci. 1997;2:d12–d26. doi: 10.2741/a171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sommer J, Effenberger T, Volpi E, Waetzig GH, Bernhardt M, Suthaus J, et al. Constitutively active mutant gp130 receptor protein from inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma is inhibited by an anti-gp130 antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin 11 signaling. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:13743–13751. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.349167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heindryckx F, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H. Experimental mouse models for hepatocellular carcinoma research. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009;90:367–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00656.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang H, Yang ES, Jiang J, Nowsheen S, Xia F. DNA damage-induced cytotoxicity is dissociated from BRCA1's DNA repair function but is dependent on its cytosolic accumulation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6258–6267. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Waris G, Ahsan H. Reactive oxygen species: role in the development of cancer and various chronic conditions. J Carcinog. 2006;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-3163-5-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. He G, Karin M. NF-kappaB and STAT3 - key players in liver inflammation and cancer. Cell Res. 2011;21:159–168. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. He G, Yu GY, Temkin V, Ogata H, Kuntzen C, Sakurai T, et al. Hepatocyte IKKbeta/NF-kappaB inhibits tumor promotion and progression by preventing oxidative stress-driven STAT3 activation. Cancer Cell. 17:286–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gu FM, Li QL, Gao Q, Jiang JH, Zhu K, Huang XY, et al. IL-17 induces AKT-dependent IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 activation and tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 10:150. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miyakoshi M, Yamamoto M, Tanaka H, Ogawa K. Serine 727 phosphorylation of STAT3: an early change in mouse hepatocarcinogenesis induced by neonatal treatment with diethylnitrosamine. Mol Carcinog. 2014;53:67–76. doi: 10.1002/mc.21949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hosui A, Kimura A, Yamaji D, Zhu BM, Na R, Hennighausen L. Loss of STAT5 causes liver fibrosis and cancer development through increased TGF-{beta} and STAT3 activation. J Exp Med. 2009;206:819–831. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mueller KM, Kornfeld JW, Friedbichler K, Blaas L, Egger G, Esterbauer H, et al. Impairment of hepatic growth hormone and glucocorticoid receptor signaling causes steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Hepatology. 2011;54:1398–1409. doi: 10.1002/hep.24509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Migone TS, Lin JX, Cereseto A, Mulloy JC, O'Shea JJ, Franchini G, et al. Constitutively activated Jak-STAT pathway in T cells transformed with HTLV-I. Science. 1995;269:79–81. doi: 10.1126/science.7604283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moriggl R, Sexl V, Piekorz R, Topham D, Ihle JN. Stat5 activation is uniquely associated with cytokine signaling in peripheral T cells. Immunity. 1999;11:225–230. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80097-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moriggl R, Topham DJ, Teglund S, Sexl V, McKay C, Wang D, et al. Stat5 is required for IL-2-induced cell cycle progression of peripheral T cells. Immunity. 1999;10:249–259. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee TK, Poon RT, Yuen AP, Man K, Yang ZF, Guan XY, et al. Rac activation is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5082–5089. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. He G, Yu GY, Temkin V, Ogata H, Kuntzen C, Sakurai T, et al. Hepatocyte IKKbeta/NF-kappaB inhibits tumor promotion and progression by preventing oxidative stress-driven STAT3 activation. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:286–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Di Maio M, De Maio E, Morabito A, D'Aniello R, De Feo G, Gallo C, et al. Hormonal treatment of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1089:252–261. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu J, Attisano L. Mutations in the tumor suppressors Smad2 and Smad4 inactivate transforming growth factor beta signaling by targeting Smads to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:4820–4825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu WY, Li J, Wu ZS, Zhang CL, Meng XL. STAT3 activation in monocytes accelerates liver cancer progression. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:506. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–2576. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;48:1312–1327. doi: 10.1002/hep.22506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Howlett M, Judd LM, Jenkins B, La Gruta NL, Grail D, Ernst M, et al. Differential regulation of gastric tumor growth by cytokines that signal exclusively through the coreceptor gp130. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1005–1018. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ernst M, Najdovska M, Grail D, Lundgren-May T, Buchert M, Tye H, et al. STAT3 and STAT1 mediate IL-11-dependent and inflammation-associated gastric tumorigenesis in gp130 receptor mutant mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1727–1738. doi: 10.1172/JCI34944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rebouissou S, Amessou M, Couchy G, Poussin K, Imbeaud S, Pilati C, et al. Frequent in-frame somatic deletions activate gp130 in inflammatory hepatocellular tumours. Nature. 2009;457:200–204. doi: 10.1038/nature07475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nri1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Johnson C, Han Y, Hughart N, McCarra J, Alpini G, Meng F. Interleukin-6 and its receptor, key players in hepatobiliary inflammation and cancer. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 1:58–70. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4778.2011.11.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kalra M, Mayes J, Assefa S, Kaul AK, Kaul R. Role of sex steroid receptors in pathobiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5945–5961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bromberg JF, Wrzeszczynska MH, Devgan G, Zhao Y, Pestell RG, Albanese C, et al. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell. 1999;98:295–303. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81959-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bartneck M, Ritz T, Keul HA, Wambach M, Bornemann J, Gbureck U, et al. Peptide-functionalized gold nanorods increase liver injury in hepatitis. ACS Nano. 2012;6:8767–8777. doi: 10.1021/nn302502u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams GM, Iatropoulos MJ, Jeffrey AM. Mechanistic basis for nonlinearities and thresholds in rat liver carcinogenesis by the DNA-reactive carcinogens 2-acetylaminofluorene and diethylnitrosamine. Toxicol Pathol. 2000;28:388–395. doi: 10.1177/019262330002800306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Matthews VB, Knight B, Tirnitz-Parker JE, Boon J, Olynyk JK, Yeoh GC. Oncostatin M induces an acute phase response but does not modulate the growth or maturation-status of liver progenitor (oval) cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 2005;306:252–263. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li Z, Tuteja G, Schug J, Kaestner KH. Foxa1 and Foxa2 are essential for sexual dimorphism in liver cancer. Cell. 2012;148:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lawrence T, Hageman T, Balkwill F. Cancer. Sex, cytokines, and cancer. Science. 2007;317:51–52. doi: 10.1126/science.1146052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Cubero FJ, Singh A, Borkham-Kamphorst E, Nevzorova YA, Al Masaoudi M, Haas U, et al. TNFR1 determines progression of chronic liver injury in the IKKgamma/Nemo genetic model. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1580–1592. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Teoh NC, Dan YY, Swisshelm K, Lehman S, Wright JH, Haque J, et al. Defective DNA strand break repair causes chromosomal instability and accelerates liver carcinogenesis in mice. Hepatology. 2008;47:2078–2088. doi: 10.1002/hep.22194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ito N, Kawata S, Tamura S, Takaishi K, Shirai Y, Kiso S, et al. Elevated levels of transforming growth factor beta messenger RNA and its polypeptide in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4080–4083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Cohen PA, Koski GK, Czerniecki BJ, Bunting KD, Fu XY, Wang Z, et al. STAT3- and STAT5-dependent pathways competitively regulate the pan-differentiation of CD34pos cells into tumor-competent dendritic cells. Blood. 2008;112:1832–1843. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-130138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang XP, Ghoreschi K, Steward-Tharp SM, Rodriguez-Canales J, Zhu J, Grainger JR, et al. Opposing regulation of the locus encoding IL-17 through direct, reciprocal actions of STAT3 and STAT5. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:247–254. doi: 10.1038/ni.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Betz UA, Bloch W, van den Broek M, Yoshida K, Taga T, Kishimoto T, et al. Postnatally induced inactivation of gp130 in mice results in neurological, cardiac, hematopoietic, immunological, hepatic, and pulmonary defects. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1955–1965. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.10.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES