Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2014 Apr-Jun;9(2):188–193.

Paleoparasitological Findings from Rodent Coprolites Dated At 500 CE Sassanid Era in Archeological Site of Chehrabad(Douzlakh), Salt Mine Northwestern Iran

Gholamreza MOWLAVI 1,2, Mahsasadat MAKKI 1, Iraj MOBEDI 1, Adauto ARAUJO 3, Abolfazl AALI 4, Thomas STOLLNER 5, Mostafa REZAEIAN 1,2, Nicole BOENKE 5, Gholamreza HASSANPOUR 2, Mohammad MASOUMIAN 6
PMCID: PMC4386038  PMID: 25848384

Abstract

Background

In this paper, paleoparasitological findings from rodent excrements obtained from Chehrabad Salt Mine archeological site located in northwest of Iran are demonstrated and discussed.

Methods

Chehrabad Salt Mine archeological site located in northwest of Iran, dated to the Achaemenid (mid 1st mill. BCE) and to Sassanid (3rd cent. - 7th cent. CE) period, is a unique study area to investigate parasites in the past millenniums in Iran. Rodent coprolites obtained from this archeological site were thoroughly analyzed for parasite eggs using TSP re-hydration technique.

Results

Specimen analyzed were attributed to juvenile and adult rats based on their apparent morphology comparing with the modern dried pellets of Muridea family. Helminth eggs retrieved from two positive pellets were identified as Trichosomoides crassicauda, yphacia sp. and Trichuris sp.

Conclusion

The present paper discusses the first paleoparasitological findings of rodent gastrointestinal helminthes in Iran along with possible favorite items to rats in ancient Chehrabad Salt Mine.

Keywords: Paleoparasitology, Rodent, Iran

Introduction

Although all endoparasites and ectoparasites are detectable in archeological contexts, helminth eggs with sturdy structures can be retrieved more easily from paleofecal samples (1). From another perspective, access to organic remains, like excrements in archeological sites, necessarily depends on the host population density in a certain space and time. Regarding to this issue, the order Rodentia corresponds to approximately 42% of mammalian biodiversity in the world, including 2277 extant species (2).

Therefore, rodent excrements are expected to be found in almost every archeological excavation projects performing in prehistorical and historical sites worldwide. Few available publications on rodent’s paleoparasitological data emphasize the importance of specimen collection in archeological excavation concerning rodents’ biological remains.

Recovering of some helminth ova of rodents, including Trichuris sp, Taeniid, Anoplocephalidae, Capillaria hepatica, Trichosomoides crassicauda as well as Oribatid mites in pellets and sediments obtained from Alero Mazquiarán archeological site in Argentina is highlighted in the literature (3). More records of helminths eggs in rodent coprolites dated to the Holocenic period were reported simultaneously from the same country (3, 4).

In Iran, paleoparasitology has recently appeared by identification of Taenia sp. eggs in Zanjan salt mummy number 5 (5) and consequent recovery of six different ova in soil samples, obtained from Chehrabad salt mine archeological site (6).

Herein, paleoparasitological findings from rodent excrements obtained in this site are demonstrated and discussed.

Materials and Methods

Chehrabad Mine is one of the rare examples of antique rock salt exploitation worldwide. The rock salt layers being exposed to the surface by a salt dome, a diapire (Fig. 1), have been exploited in large underground working chambers during two main eras, the Achaemenid period, 6th and the 5th century BCE and later during the Sassanid period beginning in the 3rd century. The Sassanian exploitation ended in the 7th cent and 6th century CE (7-9). All the samples being investigated have been recorded in stratigraphical context, which can be dated by the succession of strata, archaeological artifacts and AMS 14C (8).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location of Chehrabad archeological site in Iran

Rodent coprolites, number, 263,264,265 and 266, dated at 565 CE (Sassanid era), obtained from “Douzlakh”archeological site located in Zanjan Province, Iran (Fig.1, down) were transferred to the Laboratory of Helminthology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in May 2012. For retrieving helminth eggs, excrements were separately rehydrated in 0.5% trisodium phosphate aqueous solution in a 2 ml micro centrifuge tubes, for 5 days according to previous researchers (10, 11). To avoid fungi growing, 2 drops of 10% formaldehyde solution were added to each container. From each rehydrated specimen, twenty slides were carefully examined under the light microscope. Identified eggs were finally photographed and measured.

Results

Coprolites were primarily grouped to three small, and a little larger one compared with others. Samples appearance with regards to complementary information accumulated during the study, led us to assign the coprolites most probably to rats (Rattus sp.). All four analyzed pellets were obtained from a 5 square centimeters, which could be most probably belonging to merely one rat colony. Moreover, the smaller coprolites could have been laid by juvenile rats.

Of the pellets number, 263,264,265 and 266, two cases, 264 and 266 were found parasitized. Parasite eggs were identified as Syphacia sp. (Genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916), Trichosomoides crassicauda (Bellingham 1840, Railliet 1895) and Trichuris sp. (Family Trichuridae, Roederer 1761). Six Syphacia sp. eggs and fifteen eggs of T.crassicauda were retrieved from the pellet No: 264, while the analysis of the pellet number 266 demonstrated merely a single Trichuris sp. egg. Table 1, shows the number and the appearances of the coprolites and the measurements of the identified parasite eggs (Fig. 2).

Table 1.

Examined coprolites and the measurements of retrieved helminth ova

Coprolite (appearance) Identified eggs Egg measurement (μm)
Length range mean(n) width range mean(n)
263 (small) - - -

264 (small) Trichosomoides crassicauda 73.46 ± 7.38 (15) 44.93 ± 6.22 (15)
Syphacia sp. 129.66 ± 4.54 (6) 48 ± 6.78 (6)

265 (small) - - -

266 (large) Trichuris sp. 63.79 37.93

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Helminth ova identified in examined pellets

Discussion

Proven life in a certain paleoenvironment will theoretically support the expectation of obtaining biological remains in the designated place. Preservation condition including, extreme moisture, great aridity, and natural refrigeration that may lead to rapid interruption of decay in organic remains (11) are fundamental issues in paleoparasitological investigations. According to available evidences, several helminths eggs of prehistoric and historic times have been recovered from archeological remains in African continent, Middle East, Southeast Asia,American continent and Europe so far (12, 13). Moreover, natural situations like salt mine, glacial ice and amber are known to be able for preserving the biological remains including paleofeces, fungi and arthropods over a long period of time (14-16).

Chehrabad salt mine archaeological site is a unique historical preservation complex of ancient Iran in which paleoparasitological investigations can be taken placed successfully. In the present study, rodent coprolites obtained from this historical site were studied for parasite eggs. The origin of the coprolites was attributed to Rattus spp, the most well-known vertebrate pests worldwide (17) with horrible background of Black Death (18). Presence of rats in ancient salt mine of Chehrabad would be undoubtedly expected with regards to salt miners activities, employing domestic animals and ordinary keeping of food items in the site in that time. Attractive smell and debris of barbequing beef meat “Kebab” attributed to acquired taeniasis by the salt mummy No 5 in Chehrabad archeological site (5) could have been a cause of attracting rats into the salt mine. The walnut of the salt mummy No.1 found in the same location (Fig 1, down center), could be also in favor of rat infestation in surrounding environment.

Of two parasitized coprolites examined in this study, eggs of the nematodes, Trichosomoides crassicauda, Syphacia sp. and Trichuris sp. have been identified. In the literature, Trichuris sp. eggs have been reported more frequently, among which, in a particular study, out of 297 different identified eggs, finding of 267 eggs of Trichuris sp. is exemplary (4). Another helminth eggs that recovered in this study was T. crassicauda. This rat bladder worm is a hair like nematode residing in urinary tract of rats transmitting by female rats to their offspring (19) which may lead to a very high infection rate in crowded colonies. Identification of these eggs in a coprolite could be justified by urine contaminated feces explained earlier by previous researchers in Argentina (3).

Fifteen eggs of Trichosomoididae family Hall, 1916, more likely T. crassicauda were detected in the coprolite No.264. Morphological characters, including bipolar plugs, remaining of embryo inside the egg (Fig. 2. A), emerging position of the embryo from the shell (Fig 2 B,D),and prominent swelling of egg shell adjacent to poles (Fig. 2, E) have been clearly illustrated. Mean length and width were measured as 73.46 ± 7.38 and 44.93 ± 6.22 (n = 15), with SD ≥ 6, for both dimensions, indicating the eggs size variation like the similar measurements 55-80 × 30-48 and 60-70 × 30-35 μm with a wide deviation analyzed for T. crassicauda eggs previously (20, 21). It should be noted that, modern occurrence of T. crassicauda have been studied since early 20th century in the world (22, 23) and recently in Iran (24).

Detection of Syphacia sp. eggs, most likely S. muris (Fig 2, F) was another finding in the present study that has been recovered from the same pellet (No. 264) harboring T. crassicauda eggs. Identification of these two different types of eggs in a single pellet could not be interpreted as co-infection in rats since the examined coprolite might have been contaminated by the urine of the other parasitized rats, as stated above. The rodent coprolites obtained from South American archaeological sites have been shown infected with the eggs of Anoplocephalidae cestodes, Pterygo dermatitis sp. of the family Rictulariidae, T. crassicauda(3), Trichuris sp., Paraspidodera sp. of Aspidoderidae and Eucoleus sp. of the family Capillariidae (4) so far. The earlier study, in which the eggs of Taenia sp., Trichuris sp., Ascaris sp., Oxyurid eggs and Dicrocoelium sp. were recovered from different strata of Chehrabad archeological site (6) no signs of rodent parasites have been detected.

Conclusion

Paleoparasitological findings in rodents should be merely concluded from an assured rodent sample, like pellets. Rodent paleofeces excavated from Chehrabad Salt Mine archeological site were successfully remind the circulation of three common helminthic infections amongst rats in ancient Iran. The eggs of T. crassicauda, Syphacia sp. and Trichuris sp. revealed from excavated biological remains elsewhere in the world so far, were identified in two parasitized pellets of rats analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by a grant from the Center for Research of Endemic Parasites of Iran (CREPI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Collaborative efforts of Ruhr Universität Bochum, Institute of Archaeological Studies, the German Mining Museum Bochum and Archaeological Museum of Zanjan, Iran are highly appreciated. Thanks are due to Dr Salahimoghaddam A. at Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences for preparing the location study on the map. The authors are grateful to Dr Hossein Keshavarz Valian, Dr Mehdi Mohebali and Dr Mohamad Bagher Rokni at the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran for their kind support during the study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Reinhard KJ, Araújo A. Encyclopedia of Archaeology. New York: Academic Press; 2008. Archaeoparasitology. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wilson DE. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. JHU Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haydée Sardella N, Fugassa MH. Parasites in rodent coprolites from the historical archaeological site Alero Mazquiarán, Chubut Province,Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(1):37–42. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000100006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sardella NH, Fugassa MH. Paleoparasitological analysis of rodent coprolites in Holocenic samples from Patagonia, Argentina. J Parasitol. 2009;95(3):646–651. doi: 10.1645/GE-1809.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nezamabadi M, Mashkour M, Aali A, Stöllner T, Le Bailly M. Identification of Taenia sp. in a Natural Human Mummy (Third Century BC) from the Chehrabad Salt Mine in Iran. J Parasitol. 2013;99(3):570–572. doi: 10.1645/12-113.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nezamabadi M, Aali A, Stöllner Th, Mashkour M, Le Bailly M. Paleoparasitological analysis of samples from the Chehrabad salt mine (Northwestern Iran) Int J Paleopathol. 2013;3(3):229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aali A. Salt men. Iranian Center for Archaeological Research; ICHTO, Tehran: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aali A, Abar A, Boenke N, Pollard M, Rühli Fr, Stöllner T. Ancient salt mining and salt men: the interdisciplinary Chehrabad Douzlakh project in north-western Iran. Antiquity. 2012;86:333. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aali A, Stöllner T, Abar A, Rühli Fr. The salt men of Iran:The Salt Mine of Douzlākh, Chehrābād. Archäologisches Korrespondenz-blatt. 2012;42(1):61–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reinhard KJ, Confalonieri UE, Herrmann B, Ferreira LF, Araujo AJ. Recovery of parasite remains form coprolites and latrines: aspects of paleoparasitological technique. Homo. 1986;37(4):217–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bouchet F, Guidon N, Dittmar K, Harter S, Ferreira LF, Chaves SM, Reinhard K, Araújo A. Parasite remains in archaeological sites. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:47–52. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000900009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sianto L, Chame M, Silva CS, Gonçalves ML, Reinhard K, Fugassa M, Araújo A. Animal in human archaeological remains: a review of zoonoses in the past. Rev Inst Med trop S Paulo. 2009;51(3):119–130. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652009000300001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bouchet F, Harter S, Le Bailly M. The state of the art of paleoparasitological research in the Old World. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:95–101. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000900015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma L-J, Rogers SO, Catranis CM, Starmer WT. Detection and characterization of ancient fungi entrapped in glacial ice. Mycologia. 2000;92(2):286–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmidt AR, Jancke S, Lindquist EE, Ragazzi E, Roghi G, Nascimbene PC, Schmidt K, Wappler T, Grimaldi DA. Arthropods in amber from the Triassic Period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(37):14796–14801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208464109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boenke N. Organic Resources At The Iron Age Dürrnberg Salt-Mine (Hallein, Austria)—Long-Distance Trade Or Local Sources?*. Archaeometry. 2005;47(2):471–483. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meehan AP. Rats and mice. Their biology and control. Rentokil Ltd; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davis DE. The scarcity of rats and the Black Death: an ecological history. J Interdiscipl Hist. 1986;16(3):455–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Georgi JR, Georgi ME. Parasitology for veterinarians. 5. London Harcourt Brace Jovanovich/Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Soulsby E. Helmiths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animal. 7. Bailliere Tindall; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baker David G. Flynn’s Parasites of laboratory animals. Blackwell Publishing Publications; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thomas LJ. Studies on the life history of Trichosomoides crassicauda (Bellingham) J Parasitol. 1924;10(3):105–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coomansingh C, Pinckney RD, Bhaiyat MI, Chikweto A, Bitner S, Baffa A, Sharma R. Prevalence of endoparasites in wild rats in Grenada. West Ind Vet J. 2009;9(1):17–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kia E, Homayouni MM, Farahnak A, Mohebali M, Shojai S. Study of endoparasites of rodents and their zoonotic importance in ahvaz, south west iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2001;30(1-2):49–52. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES