Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2015 May;105(5):e51–e57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302546

A Comparison of Liver Disease Mortality With HIV and Overdose Mortality Among Georgia Prisoners and Releasees: A 2-Decade Cohort Study of Prisoners Incarcerated in 1991

Anne C Spaulding 1,, Akshay Sharma 1, Lauren C Messina 1, Maria Zlotorzynska 1, Lesley Miller 1, Ingrid A Binswanger 1
PMCID: PMC4386519  PMID: 25790417

Abstract

Objectives. We investigated whether eventual causes of death among a cohort of inmates imprisoned in the southeastern United States differed from those in previous prisoner studies.

Methods. We matched 23 510 prisoners in Georgia, a state with historically low levels of heroin consumption but moderate amounts of injection drug use, who were incarcerated on June 30, 1991, to death registries through 2010. Main exposure was 4-year time intervals over 2 decades of observation; main outcome was mortality from liver disease, HIV, and overdose.

Results. Although the HIV-related mortality rate exceeded that from liver-related conditions before 2003, liver disease subsequently surpassed HIV as a cause of death. Among 3863 deaths, 22 (0.6%) occurred within 2 weeks after release from prison. Of these, only 2 were caused by accidental poisoning (likely drug overdose). Cardiovascular disease and cancer were the most frequent causes of death in this aging cohort.

Conclusions. Our study design deemphasized immediate deaths but highlighted long-term sequelae of exposure to viral hepatitis and alcohol. Treating hepatitis C and implementing interventions to manage alcohol use disorders may improve survival among prisoners in the Southeast.


Drug use, incarceration, and mortality are intertwined: the use of illicit drugs can result in both incarceration and premature death. A 2010 international meta-analysis of prisoners' survival after their release into the community emphasized mortality from overdose in the 2 weeks following discharge, possibly attributable to loss of opiate tolerance after forced sobriety in prison,1 but a more recent publication illustrates how this pattern may vary among subpopulations.2

Long-term consequences of injection drug use include hepatitis C and HIV infection. In the United States, sexual exposure is the most common mode of HIV transmission, but the hepatitis C epidemic is mainly driven by the injection of drugs, even if the drug use is not sustained.3 HIV prevalence is 3 times as common among prisoners as among the general population,4 but hepatitis C prevalence is 13 times as high.5,6 Sequelae that could lead to death from hepatitis C typically occur 2 to 4 decades after injection drug use was initiated. Little is known about the long-term survival of inmates, particularly in the southeastern United States, where historical and recent patterns of drug use may differ from those in other regions.

In contrast with other studies that have examined cohorts of released inmates, we sought to assess long-term prisoner survival by retrospectively following a cohort composed of a cross section of all imprisoned persons in the state of Georgia on a single day in 1991. In a previous study, we did not observe significantly higher mortality among members of this cohort immediately after release from prison than in the subsequent postrelease period.7 Multiple sources suggest that heroin use is less common in Georgia than in other states. Between 2002 and 2012, consistently fewer than 6.5% of men jailed in Atlanta, the capital of and largest city in Georgia, had evidence of heroin in their urine samples.8,9 The prevalence of opiate use in Atlanta was among the lowest for any city studied in the past decade by the Office of the National Drug Control Policy.8–10 In particular, heroin use was lower than in Washington State, site of a previous study of former inmate mortality.11 According to the Treatment Episode Data Set–Admissions for 1992 to 2010 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, heroin addiction accounted for only 1.6% of admissions for drug rehabilitation in Georgia, but 9.7% in Washington State and 14.2% nationally.12

In assessment of risk for hepatitis C, needle use—whether for heroin, cocaine, or another drug—is more important than what is injected. Needle use in Georgia is not uncommon. According to population-wide National Survey on Drug Use and Health data for 2002 to 2009, 1.1% of Georgians have ever used a needle to inject drugs, including cocaine—a moderate rate compared with the frequency in Washington State, where lifetime prevalence is 2.7%, and nationally, where prevalence is 1.6%.13 State-level data on needle use prior to 2002 are not publically available from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

The prevalence of hepatitis C in the Georgia general population is moderately high, especially in Atlanta. At Grady Memorial Hospital, the safety net charity hospital for Atlanta, the prevalence of hepatitis C among ambulatory primary care patients is 7%. A liver clinic established at this hospital saw 807 unique patients in its first 5 years of existence and was still receiving 60 new patient referrals each month through 2010.14 Three quarters of the patients were African American, and most patients were born between 1945 and 1965; 64% were former drug users, and only 4% were currently using.14 High prevalence of hepatitis C in this baby boomer birth cohort probably reflects time-limited parenteral drug use decades ago, perhaps as early as the Vietnam war era.15 Despite relatively low levels of heroin use in the state, we hypothesized that the prevalence of hepatitis C would be high among inmates in the Georgia prison system who were born between 1945 and 1965.

We sought to describe the leading causes of death over 2 decades in a large cohort of all Georgians who were in state prisons on June 30, 1991, and to evaluate whether the immediate mortality following prison discharge was low, because Georgia is a state with low heroin use. In light of the moderate background rates of injection drug use in Georgia, we hypothesized that mortality from liver-related causes would rise over time as the cohort aged. Our first aim was to rank the causes of death and categorize which deaths occurred in prison, immediately after release, and subsequently. Second, we compared deaths from liver disease to those from HIV in 4-year intervals between 1991 and 2010.

METHODS

In our previous study, we assembled a cohort of 23 510 inmates residing in any prison facility under the jurisdiction of the Georgia Department of Corrections on June 30, 1991, and followed it through 2006.7 This represented a cross-section of everyone inside the prison (sometimes known as the stock population). We linked identities of all 23 510 prisoners to records in the National Death Index available through 2006.7

Data

In the study reported here, we assessed mortality outcomes. We obtained inmate administrative records from the Georgia Department of Corrections Planning and Strategic Management Section and abstracted demographic data, functional status, psychiatric classification, substance abuse record, complete incarceration history, and the result of every HIV test performed in prison. Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization recommend voluntary HIV screening for inmates, it has been mandatory upon each admission to the state prison system in Georgia since 1988.4,16–19

Subsequent to the first study, we obtained additional data on incarcerations from the Georgia Department of Corrections through 2010. As with the previous study, we matched the identities of the members of the cohort first with the Georgia Death Registry, a listing of all deaths that is maintained by the Georgia Department of Public Health, and then, for those not appearing in the Georgia Death Registry, the National Death Index, a collection of death registries from all US states. The linkage to the death registries for the previous study provided data through December 31, 2006, and the more recent linkage provided data on deaths through December 31, 2010. Mortality data included the date of death and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth (ICD-9)20 or 10th (ICD-10)21 Revision codes for the primary and secondary causes of death. We stripped personal identifiers after linkage and prior to any analyses.

First, we obtained frequency distributions of inmate characteristics: age in 1991, race/ethnicity, gender, educational level, preprison employment status, HIV status, incarceration history, and vital status. Next, we examined the primary cause of death in each of 4 periods—inside prison (either during the index incarceration or subsequent reincarceration), in the first 2 weeks after a release, in the second 2 weeks after a release, and more than 1 month after a release. We calculated the number of person-years of follow-up for the total cohort, as well as for each period of observation inside and outside prison.

Statistical Analysis

For analytic purposes, we defined liver disease–related deaths as any death from liver cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol-related liver disease, or “other, unknown, or unspecified” liver-associated conditions, because liver disease may have multiple, possibly overlapping etiologies. We categorized deaths in HIV-infected persons that occurred in the setting of other infectious or parasitic diseases and deaths coded as “HIV resulting in malignant neoplasms” as HIV infection–related deaths. The category cancer excluded liver cancer and malignant neoplasms resulting from HIV infection. We combined deaths coded as ill-defined or unknown into 1 category. The category of all other causes comprised deaths from any condition not in the top 10 categories. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used for each cause-of-death grouping are listed in Appendix A, Table A (available as a supplement to this article at http://www.ajph.org).

We then enumerated HIV infection–related and liver disease–related deaths in each of 5 periods of 4 years, from June 30, 1991, to December 31, 2010, as well as the number of person-years contributed by the cohort for each interval (Appendix A, Table B, available as a supplement to this article at http://www.ajph.org). For this final analysis, the category of other decedents comprised inmates who died from any cause other than HIV or a liver-related condition.

For each period, we first calculated the odds of dying from HIV infection–related conditions versus dying from all other causes (including liver disease–related conditions). Next, we obtained crude mortality odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals, with the 2007 to 2010 period as the referent, because our previous study indicated that HIV-related deaths were decreasing over time.7 For ease of interpretation, we performed the same calculation for liver disease–related deaths, with 1991 to 1994 as the referent period, because we hypothesized that liver deaths were rising. Finally, we derived adjusted mortality odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals by controlling for age in 1991, race/ethnicity, and gender. We used SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) for all analyses.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of the study cohort are described in Table 1. Among our study population, 16 113 persons (69%) were born between 1945 and 1965. Only 10% of our study population remained continuously incarcerated over the observation period. The cohort contributed 424 524 person-years in total, with 158 481 person-years corresponding to time spent inside prison (Table 2).

TABLE 1—

Selected Demographic Characteristics of Cohort of Inmates Incarcerated in Georgia State Prisons on June 30, 1991, Followed Until December 31, 2010

Characteristic No. (%)
Age at baseline,a y
 ≤ 19 453 (2)
 20–29 9 753 (41)
 26–46 (1945–1965 birth cohort) 16 113 (69)
 30–39 8 665 (37)
 40–49 3 407 (15)
 ≥ 50 1 232 (5)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic African American 15 493 (66)
 Non-Hispanic White 7 746 (33)
 Otherb 271 (1)
Gender
 Male 22 208 (94)
 Female 1 302 (6)
Education level at baseline
 < high school 13 581 (58)
 High school or GED 6 648 (28)
 Some college, associate degree, technical school 1 762 (7)
 College, postgraduate, or professional school 642 (3)
 Unknown 877 (4)
Employment status before incarceration
 Employed full time or part time 8 471 (36)
 Unemployed < 6 mo 4 304 (18)
 Unemployed ≥ 6 mo 7 136 (31)
 Otherc 3 599 (15)
HIV status during study periodd
 Ever positive 1 104 (5)
 Negative or unknowne 22 406 (95)
Releases during study period,d no.
 0 2 291 (10)
 1 11 040 (47)
 2 5 081 (22)
 3 2 809 (12)
 4 1 349 (6)
 ≥ 5 940 (4)
Deceased at study end
 Yes 3 863 (16)
 No 19 647 (84)

Note. GED = general educational development. The sample size was n = 23 510.

a

Mean (SD) = 32 (9); median = 31; range = 13–91.

b

Hispanics, n = 218; unknown, n = 53.

c

Incapable of work, n = 908; capable nonstudents but never worked, n = 481; students, n = 49; unknown, n = 2161.

d

Data available through September 2, 2010.

e

HIV negative, n = 21 292; indeterminate result, n = 15; unknown, n = 1099.

TABLE 2—

Leading Causes of Death Among a Cohort of Inmates Incarcerated in Georgia State Prisons on June 30, 1991, Followed Until December 31, 2010

Cause of Death Total (n = 3863, Person-Years = 424 524), No. (%) Inside Prison (n = 655, Person-Years = 158 481), No. (%) ≤ 14 Days After Any Release,a (n = 22, Person-Years = 1515), No. (%) 15–30 Days After Any Release (n = 18, Person-Years = 1733), No. (%) > 30 Days After Any Release (n = 3133, Person-Years = 262 795), No. (%)
Cardiovascular diseases 877 (23) 148 (23) 1 (5) 3 (17) 718 (23)
Unknown or other 820 (21) 133 (20) 4 (18) 2 (11) 672 (21)
Cancera 611 (16) 143 (22) 1 (5) 2 (11) 459 (15)
HIV infectionb 499 (13) 136 (21) 3 (14) 0 (0) 353 (11)
Homicide 273 (7) 6 (1) 4 (18) 6 (32) 254 (8)
Liver diseasec 237 (6) 48 (7) 1 (5) 0 (0) 187 (6)
Transportation injuries 184 (5) 1 (0) 3 (14) 1 (6) 178 (6)
Chronic respiratory diseasesd 133 (3) 20 (3) 1 (5) 0 (0) 111 (3)
Accidental poisoning 123 (3) 1 (0) 2 (9) 3 (17) 117 (4)
Suicide 106 (3) 19 (3) 2 (9) 1 (6) 84 (3)

Note. Of 3208 deaths that occurred outside prison, the relative time between release and death could not be ascertained for 35 former inmates.

a

Includes 261 with lung cancer. Excludes 36 with liver cancer and 15 with malignant neoplasms resulting from HIV infection.

b

Includes 137 where HIV resulted in other infectious or parasitic diseases, 15 where HIV resulted in malignant neoplasms, and 347 with other, unknown, or unspecified conditions.

c

Includes 85 with liver cirrhosis, 65 with viral hepatitis, 36 with liver cancer, 9 with alcohol-related liver disease (not including cirrhosis), and 42 with other, unknown, or unspecified conditions.

d

Includes 17 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

In the cohort, 3863 persons (16%) died between 1991 and 2010. Since 2006, the year of the last identity match with the National Death Index, we noted 1213 additional deaths (Appendix A, Table C, available as a supplement to this article at http://www.ajph.org). The Georgia Death Registry identified 77% of all decedents; linkage with the National Death Index identified the remaining deaths. Table 2 summarizes the 10 leading causes of death, overall and stratified by whether individuals died inside prison or after release. The majority of deaths (83.0%) occurred in the community rather than the prison setting. The leading causes of death in this cohort were similar to those commonly observed in the general population: cancer and cardiovascular diseases. These were followed by HIV infection (13%), homicide (7%), and liver disease (6%). Of 237 liver disease–related deaths, 85 were from liver cirrhosis, 65 from viral hepatitis, 36 from liver cancer, 9 from alcohol-related liver disease (not including cirrhosis), and 42 from other, unknown, or unspecified conditions.

Two of the 3863 deaths observed (< 1%) were caused by accidental poisoning in the immediate 14 days after release, yielding a rate ratio of 2.91 relative to later deaths from the same cause (P = .19). A comparison of the rate of death from overdose in the 30-day postrelease period (5/3248 person-years) and after 30 days reached a commonly recognized level of statistical significance (rate ratio = 3.46; P = .02). However, the rate ratios for other intervals (e.g., before and after 3, 6, 7, and 8 weeks and beyond) were not significant. Of the 122 accidental poisoning deaths observed, 117 (98%) occurred more than 1 month after release from the Georgia prison system (Appendix A, Table D, available as a supplement to this article at http://www.ajph.org).

HIV infection–related deaths and liver disease–related deaths identified between 1991 and 2010 are summarized in Table 3, and the rates per 100 000 are graphed in Figure 1. Over time, the proportions of deaths related to HIV infection decreased and those from liver disease increased. After adjustment for age at study start, race/ethnicity, and gender, with the 2007 to 2010 period as the referent, the odds of dying from HIV infection–related conditions versus all other causes decreased.

TABLE 3—

HIV Infection–Related and Liver Disease–Related Deaths Among a Cohort of Inmates Incarcerated in Georgia State Prisons on June 30, 1991, Followed Until December 31, 2010

Cause of Death
HIV Infection–Related Deaths
Liver Disease–Related Deaths
Time HIV Infection, No. (%) Liver Disease, No. (%) Homicide, No. (%) Other,a No. (%) Crude MOR (95% CI) Adjusted MORb (95% CI) Crude MOR (95% CI) Adjusted MORb (95% CI)
1991–1994c (n = 535, person-years = 81 600) 137 (25.6) 17 (3.2) 72 (13.5) 309 (57.8) 6.2 (4.4, 8.7) 5.8 (4.1, 8.3) 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
1995–1998 (n = 687, person-years = 90 419) 157 (22.9) 29 (4.2) 61 (8.9) 440 (64.1) 5.4 (3.8, 7.5) 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 1.3 (0.7, 2.4) 1.2 (0.7, 2.2)
1999–2002 (n = 781, person-years = 87 652) 98 (12.6) 48 (6.2) 63 (8.1) 572 (73.2) 2.7 (1.9, 3.8) 2.6 (1.8, 3.7) 1.7 (1.0, 3.0) 1.6 (0.9, 2.8)
2003–2006 (n = 875, person-years = 84 293) 57 (6.5) 66 (7.5) 39 (4.5) 713 (81.5) 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) 2.0 (1.1, 3.4) 1.8 (1.03, 3.1)
2007–2010 (n = 985, person-years = 80 561) 50 (5.1) 77 (7.8) 38 (3.9) 820 (83.3) 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref) 2.0 (1.2, 3.5) 1.8 (1.1, 3.1)

Note. CI = confidence interval; MOR = mortality odds ratio. Total deaths during study period, n = 3863.

a

Includes death from cardiovascular diseases, cancer (excluding liver cancer and malignant neoplasms resulting from HIV infection), homicide, transportation injuries, chronic respiratory diseases, accidental poisoning, suicide, and unknown or other causes.

b

Adjusted for age at study start, race/ethnicity, and gender.

c

This epoch spans June 30, 1991, to December 31, 1994. All other epochs span January to December.

FIGURE 1—

FIGURE 1—

HIV infection–related and liver disease–related mortality rates (deaths observed per year in the cohort, standardized to a population of 100 000 persons) in a cohort of 3863 inmates incarcerated in Georgia state prisons on June 30, 1991, and followed until December 31, 2010.

By contrast, the adjusted mortality odds ratios from the early years of the study to recent years comparing liver disease–related deaths with all other causes became larger, suggesting that the odds of dying from liver disease–related causes increased significantly over time. The odds of dying from liver disease–related conditions between 2007 to 2010 and 2003 to 2006 were almost twice the liver-related mortality odds during 1991 to 1994, after adjustment for inmates’ demographic characteristics. In 2003, mortality from liver disease first exceeded that from HIV (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

In our previously assembled cohort of persons imprisoned in Georgia, liver disease first surpassed HIV as a cause of death in 2003, reminiscent of the way that the nationwide age-adjusted mortality rate of hepatitis C surpassed that of HIV by 2007.22 We showed that mortality from HIV declined as our cohort aged. Many of those infected with HIV died years ago, prior to the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Future studies of cohorts assembled in the antiretroviral era may show an even lower contribution of AIDS to mortality.

Although our results clearly indicated that death from liver disease increased in this cohort, we were unable to discern how the relative contribution of alcohol use, chronic hepatitis B, and chronic hepatitis C affected liver disease–related mortality; many persons may have multiple factors that contribute to development of liver failure. Because the majority of the inmates were born between 1945 and 1965, the birth cohort with highest rates of hepatitis C,15 we expect that a large portion of the liver disease in our study population was attributable to the hepatitis C virus. Indeed, 79% of all liver-related deaths occurred among those born between 1945 and 1965. Although we are describing a cohort first incarcerated years ago and followed longitudinally, rather than the population currently imprisoned in Georgia, by combining all liver-related deaths, we can compare our data with 2001 to 2011 surveillance of in-prison deaths recently published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics,23 which showed both nationwide and in Georgia that liver disease mortality exceeded that from AIDS. As observed in our data, cancer and heart disease predominated.

We previously showed that the mortality risk in the immediate postrelease period was not significantly elevated relative to other times.7 The rarity of overdose deaths may explain the relative safety of the postrelease period in Georgia, but methodological considerations might also influence interpretations. As in our previous research,7 we categorized death immediately after release to incorporate all postrelease periods, that is, death after any prison sentence.

In contrast to studies limited to cohorts of released prisoners, we focused on lifetime experiences of persons ever incarcerated. A study not limited to recently released inmates puts less weight on the period immediately following release.24 Furthermore, longitudinal studies by definition focus on a population that increases in age throughout the observation period. Individuals who survive earlier episodes of transition to the community may be less likely to overdose in their later years. Our findings help justify screening for later sequelae of injection drug use, such as hepatitis C, among correctional populations and emphasize interventions to promote liver health, such as alcohol treatment and access to medications that can cure viral hepatitis.

Limitations

Our findings on overdose mortality within 14 and 30 days of release should be interpreted cautiously because of the small absolute number of deaths observed, but they have several implications. The degree to which immediate postrelease overdose mortality rates are elevated can vary over time and geography, according to evolving drug use patterns in the jurisdiction studied. Furthermore, rates of death observed may vary by methodology used and the analyses conducted, as reviewed by Kinner et al.24 Bird and Hutchinson,25 following Seaman et al.,26 described heightened rates of drug-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison. Our results, derived from different methodology, suggest that rates of overdose that are higher within 2 weeks than later may not be a universal phenomenon. Immediate drug-related deaths are common among those released to areas where heroin is plentiful.11,25,27–29 Heroin use was not highly prevalent in Georgia during the study period, although heroin and pharmaceutical opioid use may have risen since then. Our findings suggest that public health investments to address the needs of released inmates should be tailored to current local conditions, including drug use patterns. For example, where heroin use is prevalent, interventions to prevent deaths from overdose, such as the take-home naloxone program piloted in Scottish prisons,30,31 could be appropriate.

We matched identities from custody data and death registries with probabilistic algorithms that in rare instances misclassify a match or nonmatch. Deaths of individuals who entered other state prison systems, jails, or the Federal Bureau of Prisons after their Georgia incarceration were not captured, which may have caused us to miss some postrelease deaths in our cohort.

We obtained causes of mortality from death certificates of the prisoners and released inmates that were filled out by physicians or county coroners. Unlike many other states, Georgia does not mandate autopsy for deaths in custody. The cause of death might not have been recorded accurately, thereby introducing the potential for misclassification. The relative contributions of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and alcoholism to the pathogenesis of liver disease in this cohort is unknown.

The percentage of deaths attributed to unknown disease (2%) was high, but perhaps predictable. For persons previously or currently involved in the criminal justice system (including under community supervision, i.e., probation and parole), the chief focus of a coroner may be to rule whether a person died from unnatural causes (necessitating a criminal investigation) or natural causes.

Conclusions

Despite the limitations involved in a retrospective study of mortality, we believe our results show that hepatitis C accounts for a rising proportion of deaths among persons who have been involved in the criminal justice system in Georgia; however, an examination of deaths among more recent cohorts of inmates would be required to confirm that this finding persists. Alcohol use may be contributing to mortality, and substance abuse treatment is warranted, but this should be coupled with prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis. Nationally, a tsunami of cases of decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer is predicted over the next few decades both outside and inside correctional facilities.5,32 Even states such as Georgia, without a high current prevalence of injection heroin use, could face this epidemic. However, antiviral therapy for hepatitis C has rapidly improved and could mitigate the impact of previous injection drug use by the baby boom generation.

Although prison-based interventions for tobacco cessation beyond in-facility smoking bans are warranted to lower mortality from the leading causes (heart disease and cancer),33 attention should also be directed to conditions that are now curable, such as hepatitis C. Oral regimens of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C offer a nearly universal cure with few side effects.34–37 Partnerships between the prison system and community health systems could be developed to help coordinate the treatment of individuals leaving prison. Other issues, such as high homicide rates in the impoverished communities to which released inmates return, merit attention. In our cohort, deaths from homicide exceeded those from liver disease for the first decade after initial release (Table 3). How to diminish homicides among released inmates needs further study.

Complementing the advent of improved therapy for hepatitis C, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revised its hepatitis C screening guidelines in 2012, recommending that all persons born between 1945 and 1965 receive a hepatitis C antibody test.38 A simulated economic model showed that in this birth cohort, screening followed by treatment is cost effective.39 The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends voluntary hepatitis C screening for persons who have been incarcerated.40 A recent study demonstrated that use of direct-acting agents in prison populations is cost effective from a societal standpoint.41 Combining enhanced identification of undiagnosed hepatitis C in this high-prevalence population with thoughtful medical management can significantly temper the expected surge in cases of hepatitis C–related liver disease and death. Our study suggests that because current and former prisoners live long enough to experience sequelae of liver disease, they need better long-term treatments; many persons who have been prisoners will be appropriate candidates for efficacious and cost-effective antiviral treatment.37

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Emory Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI050409) under a supplement from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Center for AIDS Research–National Cancer Institute.

We acknowledge Samantha M. Luffy and Nyiramugisha K. Niyibizi for assistance with article editing. We thank Timothy S. Carr of the Georgia Department of Corrections for his assistance with procuring inmate records.

Human Participant Protection

Ethical approval was granted to this no-contact study by the Emory University institutional review board and the Georgia Department of Public Health.

References

  • 1.Merrall ELC, Kariminia A, Binswanger IA et al. Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction. 2010;105(9):1545–1554. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02990.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Forsyth SJ, Alati R, Ober C, Williams GM, Kinner SA. Striking subgroup differences in substance-related mortality after release from prison. Addiction. 2014;109(10):1676–1683. doi: 10.1111/add.12646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denniston MM, Jiles RB, Drobeniuc J et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):293–300. doi: 10.7326/M13-1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maruschak LM. HIV in Prisons, 2001–2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2012. NCJ 238877. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spaulding AS, Kim AY, Harzke AJ et al. Impact of new therapeutics for hepatitis C virus infection in incarcerated populations. Top Antivir Med. 2013;21(1):27–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Varan AK, Mercer DW, Stein MS, Spaulding AC. Hepatitis C seroprevalence among prison inmates since 2001: still high, but declining. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(2):187–195. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spaulding AC, Seals RM, McCallum VA, Perez SD, Brzozowski AK, Steenland NK. Prisoner survival inside and outside of the institution: implications for health-care planning. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(5):479–487. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Office of National Drug Control Policy. ADAM project. Drug use by type or city. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/arrestee-drug-abuse-monitoring-program/latest-trends-in-arrestee-drug-use-by-drug-type-or-city Accessed May 20, 2013.
  • 9.Office of National Drug Control Policy. ADAM II 2012. Annual report of the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program. 2013. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/policy-and-research/adam_ii_2012_annual_rpt_web.pdf Accessed December 7, 2014.
  • 10.Office of National Drug Control Policy. ADAM II data sets. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/ondcp-data-sets. Accessed May 20, 2013.
  • 11.Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA et al. Release from prison—a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(2):157–165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Episode Data Set–Admissions (TEDS-A)—Concatenated, 1992 to 2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; 2014. ICPSR25221-v9. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.US Dept of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2012. ICPSR34933-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2014-10-06. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.
  • 14.Miller L, Fluker SA, Osborn M, Liu X, Strawder A. Improving access to hepatitis C care for urban, underserved patients using a primary care-based hepatitis C clinic. J Natl Med Assoc. 2012;104(5–6):244–250. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):705–714. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Taussig J, Shouse RL, LaMarre M et al. HIV transmission among male inmates in a state prison system—Georgia, 1992–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(15):421–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV testing implementation guidance for correctional settings. 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk_Correctional_Settings_Guidelines.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2015.
  • 19. Policy Brief: HIV Testing and Counselling in Prisons and Other Closed Settings. Vienna and Geneva: UN Office of Drugs and Crime and World Health Organization; 2009. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/idu/tc_prison_tech_paper.pdf?ua=1. Accessed November 1, 2014.
  • 20.International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ly KN, Xing J, Klevens RM, Jiles RB, Ward JW, Holmberg SD. The increasing burden of mortality from viral hepatitis in the United States between 1999 and 2007. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(4):271–278. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ginder S, Noonan M. Mortality in Local Jails and State Prisons, 2000–2011—Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2013. NCJ 242186. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kinner SA, Forsyth S, Williams G. Systematic review of record linkage studies of mortality in ex-prisoners: why (good) methods matter. Addiction. 2013;108(1):38–49. doi: 10.1111/add.12010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bird SM, Hutchinson SJ. Male drugs-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison: Scotland, 1996–99. Addiction. 2003;98(2):185–190. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Seaman SR, Brettle RP, Gore SM. Mortality from overdose among injecting drug users recently released from prison: database linkage study. BMJ. 1998;316(7129):426–428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Harding-Pink D. Mortality following release from prison. Med Sci Law. 1990;30(1):12–16. doi: 10.1177/002580249003000104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seymour A, Oliver JS, Black M. Drug-related deaths among recently released prisoners in the Strathclyde Region of Scotland. J Forensic Sci. 2000;45(3):649–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Graham A. Post-prison mortality: unnatural death among people released from Victoria prisons between January 1990 and December 1999. Aust N Z J Criminol. 2003;36(1):94–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Darke S. From the can to the coffin: deaths among recently released prisoners. Addiction. 2008;103(2):256–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strang J, Bird SM, Parmar MK. Take-home emergency naloxone to prevent heroin overdose deaths after prison release: rationale and practicalities for the N-ALIVE randomized trial. J Urban Health. 2013;90(5):983–996. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9803-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Davis GL, Alter MJ, El-Serag H, Poynard T, Jennings LW. Aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(2):513–521. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Clarke JG, Stein LA, Martin RA et al. Forced smoking abstinence: not enough for smoking cessation. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):789–794. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1878–1887. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kowdley KV, Lawitz E, Poordad F et al. Phase 2b trial of interferon-free therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 1. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):222–232. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sulkowski MS, Gardiner DF, Rodriguez-Torres M et al. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):211–221. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kohli A, Shaffer A, Sherman A, Kottilil S. Treatment of hepatitis C: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(6):631–640. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Smith BD, Morgan RL, Beckett GA et al. Virus testing of persons born during 1945–1965: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(11):817–822. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rein DB, Smith BD, Wittenborn JS et al. The cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening for hepatitis C antibody in US primary care settings. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(4):263–270. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moyer VA. Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(5):349–357. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu S, Watcha D, Holodniy M, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens for chronic, genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection in US incarcerated populations: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(8):546–553. doi: 10.7326/M14-0602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES