Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2014 Sep 17;69(4):509–513. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.197

How do the new WHO discharge criteria for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition affect the performance of therapeutic feeding programmes? New evidence from India

V M Aguayo 1,*, N Badgaiyan 1, K Singh 2
PMCID: PMC4387550  PMID: 25226818

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

To assesses how the introduction of new WHO discharge criteria for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) may affect the performance of therapeutic feeding programmes in India.

Subjects/Methods:

The analysis concerns 6041 children admitted to Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers (NRCs) in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh between 1 July 2009 and 31 December 2011.

Results:

A total of 217 children (3.6%) had bilateral pitting oedema, 1803 (29.8%) had severe wasting with medical complications, 4021 (66.6%) had uncomplicated severe wasting and 4810 (79.7%) were in the age group 6–23 months old. The programme has high survival (>99%), default (⩾15%) and discharge (>75%) rates. The use of weight gain ⩾15% as recovery criteria (old criteria) translates into recovery rates in NRCs that range from 33.6% for children admitted with weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) ⩽−3 to 35.2% for children admitted with mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <115 mm. The use of WHZ ⩾−2 as recovery criteria reduces recovery rates by ~2-fold (17.5%) while the use of MUAC ⩾125 mm as recovery criteria reduces recovery rates by 3.5-fold (10%). The new criteria tends to keep longer in the programme children who are younger and/or have poorer anthropometry at admission (that is, more vulnerable).

Conclusions:

The new WHO discharge criteria reduce the recovery rates currently reported by programmes for the treatment of children with SAM in India. However, their introduction in the programme practice will increase programme impact—particularly if accompanied by a general improvement in the strategy and protocols currently used—as they prioritize the most vulnerable children.

Introduction

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is a threat to child survival as mortality rates in children with severe wasting are nine times higher.1 Globally, about 19 million children are severely wasted.2 With some eight million under fives severely wasted, India is at the epicenter of this crisis despite the country's recent economic growth.3, 4

India's response to SAM relies on a facility-based approach that provides care for children with SAM through a network of Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers (NRCs). In addition, a few states are piloting programmes where children with SAM are admitted to NRCs and later are transitioned to a community phase.

Children 6–59 months are admitted to these programmes, if they have (a) bilateral oedema; or (b) a weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) ⩽−3; or (c) a mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) <115 mm. Once admitted, children receive therapeutic care following the national guidelines by Ministry of Health,5 on the basis of those by the Indian Academy of Pediatrics6 and WHO.7

In line with national and international guidance, recovery rates in these programmes have been defined as the proportion of children gaining ⩾15% of their initial weight. However, analyses have reported that while these programmes achieve good survival outcomes, only a moderate proportion of children have recovered by the time of discharge.8, 9, 10

In 2013, WHO issued new global guidance indicating that percentage weight gain should not be used as discharge criterion. The revised guidance advises that children with SAM should be discharged when they have: (a) WHZ ⩾−2 and no oedema for at least 2 weeks; or (b) MUAC ⩾125 mm and no oedema for at least 2 weeks. The anthropometric indicator (MUAC or WHZ) used to confirm SAM at admission should be used to assess nutritional recovery.11

The objective of this analysis is to assess how the introduction of the new WHO discharge criteria for the treatment of SAM may affect the performance of therapeutic feeding programmes in India.

Materials and methods

This paper analyzes programme data on 6041 children 6–59 months old admitted to NRCs in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh (1 July 2009 to 31 December 2011) for whom programme records were complete. SAM was defined by the presence of bilateral pitting oedema or the presence of severe wasting.12 Severe wasting was defined as a MUAC <115 mm and/or WHZ ⩽−3 of the median WHZ in WHO Child Growth Standards.13

At the NRC, a physician conducted a clinical examination to detect the presence/absence of medical complications using the criteria for the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses.14 Children with bilateral pitting oedema, and/or medical complications and/or poor appetite were fed locally prepared F-75 therapeutic milk every 2 h for 2 days (stabilization phase) while their medical complications were treated. After completion of the initial 48 h in the NRC, children were fed locally prepared F-100 therapeutic milk six times a day for 48 h to initiate rapid weight gain (rehabilitation phase). Children free of oedema and medical complications with normal appetite entered the rehabilitation phase from admission. After 4 days at the NRC, children were fed locally prepared F-100 alternated with locally prepared semi-solid foods until discharge. All the children admitted to the NRC were administered age-appropriate preventive vitamin A, folic acid, zinc, potassium and magnesium and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Feeding, supplementation and care protocols have been described in detail elsewhere.8, 9, 10

Children were discharged when they met the following criteria: (1) the child was active and alert; (2) the child had no signs of oedema, fever and/or infection; (3) the child had completed all age-appropriate immunizations; (4) the child was fed at least 120–130 kcal/kg weight/day; (5) children had completed the prescribed 14-day stay in the NRC; and (6) the primary caregiver was informed about follow-up care.

In Madhya Pradesh, children were transitioned to the community phase of the programme where they were followed by the frontline workers of the state's Integrated Child Development Services and National Rural Health Mission, who ensured that children benefitted from Integrated Child Development Services Supplementary Nutrition Program and returned for four follow-up visits at the NRC every 15 days. At each follow-up visit, children's weight gain was assessed and mothers were counseled on child feeding and care.

Data collection procedures have been described in detail elsewhere.8, 9, 10 Analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software, Release 12, 2011. Mean values are provided as mean±s.d. For all tests, P<0.05 was considered significant.

Findings

Of the children admitted, 3169 (52.5%) were girls, 3888 (64.3%) were from scheduled castes or scheduled tribes and 4810 (79.7%) were in the age group 6–23 months old. On admission, 217 (3.6%) had bilateral pitting oedema, 1803 (29.8%) had severe wasting with medical complications and 4021 (66.6%) had uncomplicated severe wasting (Table 1).

Table 1. Admissions and programme outcomes among children admitted with severe acute malnutrition to the Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, India 2009–2011.

  Admissions
Deaths
Defaulters
Discharged
  n % n % Rate n % Rate n % Rate
Total 6041 100 30 100.0 0.50 1413 100.0 23.4 4598 100.0 76.1
Girls 3169 52.5 12 40.0 0.38 693 49.0 21.9 2464 53.6 77.8
Boys 2872 47.5 18 60.0 0.63 720 51.0 25.1 2134 46.4 74.3
6–11 Months old 2082 34.5 10 33.3 0.48 499 35.3 24.0 1573 34.2 75.6
12–23 Months old 2728 45.2 12 40.0 0.44 639 45.2 23.4 2077 45.2 76.1
24–59 Months old 1231 20.4 8 26.7 0.65 275 19.5 22.3 948 20.6 77.0
Scheduled caste (SC) 1313 21.7 4 13.3 0.30 321 22.7 24.4 988 21.5 75.2
Scheduled tribe (ST) 2575 42.6 15 50.0 0.58 477 33.8 18.5 2083 45.3 80.9
Non SC-ST 2153 35.6 11 36.7 0.51 615 43.5 28.6 1527 33.2 70.9
Jharkhand 2671 44.2 17 56.7 0.64 546 38.6 20.4 2108 45.8 78.9
Madhya Pradesh 2376 39.3 2 6.7 0.08 460 32.6 19.4 1914 41.6 80.6
Uttar Pradesh 994 16.5 11 36.7 1.11 407 26.0 36.9 576 12.5 57.9
With bilateral pitting oedema 217 3.6 10 33.3 4.61 61 4.3 28.1 146 3.2 67.3
With severe wasting 5824 96.4 20 66.7 0.34 1352 95.7 23.2 4452 96.8 76.4
 MUAC <115 and WHZ>−3 823 13.6 1 3.3 0.12 190 13.4 23.1 632 13.7 76.8
 WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC ⩾115 1259 20.8 1 3.3 0.08 300 21.2 23.8 958 20.8 76.1
 MUAC <115 and WHZ ⩽−3 3742 61.9 18 60.0 0.48 862 61.0 23.0 2862 62.2 76.5
 Complicated severe wasting 1803 29.8 10 33.3 0.55 357 25.3 19.8 1436 31.2 79.6
 Uncomplicated severe wasting 4021 66.6 10 33.3 0.25 995 70.4 24.7 3016 65.6 75.0

Abbreviations: MUAC, mid-upper-arm circumference; WHZ, weight-for-height z-score.

The following outcomes were recorded in the NRCs: Deaths: 30 children (0.5%) died after an average length of stay of 4.2±2.7 days. Defaulters: 1413 children (23.4%) defaulted after an average length of stay of 8.0±3.8 days. Discharged: 4598 children (76.1%) were discharged after an average length of stay of 15.3±2.7 days. Children's average weight gain—determined as the total individual weight gain (after loss of oedema in the case of children who had oedema at admission) of all the children discharged divided by the total number of children discharged—was 9.3±14.8 g/kg body weight/day (Table 1).

A total of 3494 oedema-free children were admitted to NRCs with a MUAC <115 mm. At the time of discharge, 1229 (35.2%) had gained ⩾15% of their initial weight while only 349 (10%) had a MUAC ⩾125 mm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicates that the odds of recovery on the basis of a minimum 15% weight gain were higher among younger children (6–23 months old; odd ratio (OR)=1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08–1.72) and children with poorer anthropometry at admission (that is, MUAC <115 mm and WHZ ⩽−3; OR=1.73, 95% CI=1.40–2.14) while the odds of recovery on the basis of an MUAC ⩾125 mm were higher among older children (24–59 months old; OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.19–1.74) and children with better anthropometry at admission (WHZ >−3; OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.59–2.16; Table 2).

Table 2. Number and proportion of children discharged recovered among those admitted to Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, India 2009–2011.

  Children with MUAC <115 at admission
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission
  Children with MUAC <115 at admission Children with MUAC <115 at admission and weight gain ⩾15% at discharge
Children with MUAC <115 at admission and MUAC ⩾125 at discharge
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission and weight gain ⩾15% at discharge
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission and WHZ ⩾−2 at discharge
  n n % n % n n % n %
Total 3494 1229 35.2 349 10.0 3820 1282 33.6 670 17.5
Girls 1799 623 34.6 172 9.6 2203 690 31.3 343 15.6
Boys 1695 606 35.8 177 10.4 1617 592 36.6 327 20.2
6–11 Months old 1368 553 40.4 129 9.4 1324 535 40.4 271 20.5
12–23 Months old 1561 496 31.8 151 9.7 1722 537 31.2 280 16.3
24–59 Months old 565 180 31.9 69 12.2 774 210 27.1 119 15.4
Scheduled caste (SC) 755 261 34.6 72 9.5 821 274 33.4 143 17.4
Scheduled tribe (ST) 1617 629 38.9 157 9.7 1752 648 37.0 324 18.5
Non SC-ST (all the rest) 1122 339 30.2 120 10.7 1247 360 28.9 203 16.3
Jharkhand 1567 734 46.8 295 18.8 1810 783 43.3 422 23.3
Madhya Pradesh 1451 308 21.2 38 2.6 1561 320 20.5 178 11.4
Uttar Pradesh 476 187 39.3 16 3.4 449 179 39.9 70 15.6
 MUAC <115 and WHZ>−3 632 149 23.6 65 10.3 NA NA NA NA NA
 WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC ⩾115 NA NA NA NA NA 958 202 21.1 193 20.1
 MUAC <115 and WHZ ⩽−3 2862 1080 37.7 284 9.9 2862 1080 37.7 477 16.7
 Complicated severe wasting 1185 443 37.4 185 15.6 1262 450 35.7 208 16.5
 Uncomplicated severe wasting 2309 786 34.0 164 7.1 2558 832 32.5 462 18.1

Abbreviations: MUAC, mid-upper-arm circumference; NA, not applicable; WHZ, weight-for-height z-score.

Similarly, of the 3820 oedema-free children admitted with WHZ ⩽−3, 1282 (33.6%) had gained ⩾15% of their initial weight at discharge from the NRC while only 670 (17.5%) had a WHZ ⩾−2. The odds of recovery on the basis of a minimum 15% weight gain were higher among younger children (6–23 months old; OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.02–1.43) and children with poorer anthropometry at admission (WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC <115 mm; OR=4.25, 95% CI=3.58–5.06), while the odds of recovery on the basis of WHZ ⩾−2 were higher among children with better anthropometry at admission (MUAC ⩾115 mm; OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.91–2.96; Table 2).

In Madhya Pradesh, 1914 children (72%) were discharged from the NRC after an average stay of 14.2±1.2 days and were transitioned to the community phase of the programme (Table 3). During the community phase, eight children (0.42%) died, 286 children (14.9%) defaulted and 1620 children (84.6%) were discharged after an average length of stay of 60±15.5 days with an average weight gain of 1.60±2.03 g/kg body weight/day.

Table 3. Programme outcomes among children admitted to the community phase of the programme for the management of severe acute malnutrition in Madhya Pradesh, India 2009–2011.

  Admissions Deaths
Defaulters
Discharged
  n n % Rate n % Rate n % Rate
Total 1914 8 100.0 0.42 286 100.0 14.9 1620 100.0 84.6
Girls 1174 4 50.0 0.34 162 56.6 13.8 1008 62.2 85.9
Boys 740 4 50.0 0.54 124 43.4 16.8 612 37.8 82.7
6–11 Months old 666 5 62.5 0.75 108 37.8 16.2 553 34.1 83.0
12–23 Months old 858 2 25.0 0.23 125 43.7 14.6 731 45.1 85.2
24–59 Months old 390 1 12.5 0.26 53 18.5 13.6 336 20.7 86.2
Scheduled caste (SC) 466 0 0.0 0.00 59 20.6 12.7 407 25.1 87.3
Scheduled tribe (ST) 775 5 62.5 0.65 141 49.3 18.2 629 38.8 81.2
Non SC-ST 673 3 37.5 0.45 86 30.1 12.8 584 36.0 86.8
 MUAC <115 and WHZ >−3 658 1 12.5 0.15 90 31.5 13.7 567 35.0 86.2
 WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC ⩾115 167 0 0.0 0.00 21 7.3 12.6 146 9.0 87.4
 MUAC <115 and WHZ ⩽−3 629 7 87.5 1.11 124 43.4 19.7 498 30.7 79.2
 MUAC ⩾115 and WHZ ⩾−3 460 0 0.0 0.00 51 17.8 11.1 409 25.2 88.9

Abbreviations: MUAC, mid-upper-arm circumference; WHZ, weight-for-height z-score.

A total of 1781 oedema-free children were admitted to the NRCs in Madhya Pradesh with a MUAC <115 mm. By the time they were discharged from the community phase, 1240 (69.6%) had gained ⩾15% of their initial weight whereas only 796 (44.7%) had an MUAC ⩾125 mm. The odds of recovery on the basis of a weight gain ⩾15% were higher among younger children (6–23 months old; OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.22–2.11) and children with poorer anthropometry at admission (MUAC <115 mm and WHZ ⩽−3) (OR=2.22, 95% CI=1.73–2.24) whereas the odds of recovery on the basis of MUAC ⩾125 mm were higher among children with better anthropometry at admission (WHZ >−3; OR=1.72, 95% CI=1.41–2.10; Table 4).

Table 4. Number and proportion of children discharged recovered among those admitted to Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers in Madhya Pradesh, India 2009–2011.

  Children with MUAC <115 at admission
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission
  Children with MUAC <115 at admission Children with MUAC <115 at admission and weight gain ⩾15% at discharge
Children with MUAC <115 at admission and MUAC ⩾125 at discharge
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission and weight gain ⩾15% at discharge
Children with WHZ ⩽−3 at admission and WHZ ⩾−2 at discharge
  n n % n % n n % n %
Total 1781 1,240 69.6 796 44.7 1941 1315 67.7 1108 57.1
Girls 1017 526 51.7 441 43.4 1296 849 65.5 673 51.9
Boys 764 714 93.5 355 46.5 645 466 72.2 435 67.4
6–11 Months old 721 542 75.2 336 46.6 686 522 76.1 447 65.2
12–23 Months old 803 542 67.5 347 43.2 852 579 68.0 463 54.3
24–59 Months old 257 156 60.7 113 44.0 403 214 53.1 198 49.1
Scheduled caste (SC) 415 308 74.2 176.0 42.4 454 323 71.1 276 60.8
Scheduled tribe (ST) 779 530 68.0 381.0 48.9 795 548 68.9 458 57.6
Non SC-ST (all the rest) 587 402 68.5 239.0 40.7 692 444 64.2 374 54.0
 MUAC <115 and WHZ>−3 383 216 56.4 176 46.0 NA NA NA NA NA
 WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC ⩾115 NA NA NA NA NA 543 291 53.6 289 53.2
 MUAC <115 and WHZ ⩽−3 1398 1024 73.2 620 44.3 1398 1024 73.2 819 58.6
 Complicated severe wasting 454 329 72.5 209 46.0 498 363 72.9 310 62.2
 Uncomplicated severe wasting 1327 911 68.7 587 44.2 1443 952 66.0 798 55.3

Abbreviations: MUAC, mid-upper-arm circumference; NA, not applicable; WHZ, weight-for-height z-score.

Similarly, of the 1941 oedema-free children admitted to the NRCs in Madhya Pradesh with WHZ ⩽−3, 1315 (67.7%) had gained ⩾15% of their initial weight when they were discharged from the community phase whereas only 1108 (57.1%) had a WHZ ⩾−2. The odds of recovery on the basis of a weight gain ⩾15% were higher among children with poorer anthropometry at admission (WHZ ⩽−3 and MUAC <115; OR=1.91, 95% CI=1.54–2.38). Recovery rates were not significantly different among children with poorer or better anthropometry at admission when the criteria used was WHZ ⩾−2 (Table 4).

Discussion

We used programme data on 6041 children 6–59 months old admitted to NRCs in Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh to assess how the introduction of the new WHO discharge criteria for the treatment of SAM may affect the performance of therapeutic feeding programmes in India.

The proportion of children discharged from the facility- and community-based programmes (76.1 and 84.6%, respectively) is above minimum national/international standards (>75%).5,15 The average weight gain while in the NRC (9.3±14.8 g/kg body weight/day) is above the minimum 8 g/kg body weight/day recommended while the average weight gain while in the community phase (1.60±2.03 g/kg body weight/day) is below that observed in other settings (4–5 g//kg body weight/day)16 possibly indicating that the nutrient density of the foods used is substandard to ensure appropriate weight gain and timely recovery.

The use of WHZ ⩾−2 as recovery criteria (new criteria) translates into an ~2-fold reduction in recovery rates while in the NRC (from 33.6–17.5%) and a 1.2-fold reduction by the end of the community phase in Madhya Pradesh (from 67.7–57.1%). Similarly, the use of MUAC >125 mm as recovery criteria (new criteria) translates into a ~3.5 fold reduction in recovery rates while in the NRC (from 35.2–10.0%) and a 1.6-fold reduction by the end of the community phase in M. Pradesh (from 69.6–44.7%). Importantly, the old criteria tends to discharge sooner children who are younger (0–23 months old) and have poorer anthropometry at admission (i.e. more vulnerable) while the new criteria tends to keep them longer in the programme.

In conclusion, the new WHO discharge criteria reduce significantly the recovery rates currently reported by programmes for the treatment of children with SAM in India. However, their introduction in programme practice will increase programme impact as with the new WHO discharge criteria, the most vulnerable children (younger, with poorer anthropometry at admission, at a higher risk) tend to spend a longer time in the programme whereas the least vulnerable (older, with better anthropometry at admission, at a lower risk) tend to be discharged sooner.

The introduction of the new discharge criteria should be accompanied by improvements in the strategy and protocols currently used, with particular attention to: (1) Detecting children with SAM early—when they are young and less severely wasted, using MUAC <115 mm;12 (2) Admitting to NRCs only children with oedema/complicated wasting and keeping them in the NRC until oedema/complications disappear and weight gain starts, no longer; (3) Providing care for all children with uncomplicated SAM in the community; over 50 countries have adopted this approach;17 (4) Using therapeutic foods that meet the nutrient composition recommended by WHO; appropriate therapeutic foods for the management of SAM in the community are manufactured to international standards in India, and there is emerging consensus on how they should be used;18, 19, 20, 21, 22 (5) Discharging children on the basis of a minimum MUAC (⩾125 mm, for example) or minimum WHZ (>−2, for example), not on the basis of a minimum weight gain or minimum length of stay; and (6) Ensuring that children benefit from Integrated Child Development Services once they are discharged from the programme for the management of SAM.

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the commercial sector. The opinions expressed on this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent an official position by UNICEF.

Author contributions

VMA designed the study, led data analysis and wrote the paper. NB led data management. KS contributed to data interpretation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. For the Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences Lancet 2008371243–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382:427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Tracking progress on child and maternal nutrition. A survival and development priority. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF): New York, NY, USA; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chatterjee P. Child malnutrition rises in India despite economic boom. Lancet. 2007;369:1417–1478. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60650-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare . Operational guidelines on facility-based management of children with severe acute malnutrition. Government of India: New Delhi, India; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Indian Academy of Pediatrics Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2006 guidelines for hospital-based management of severely malnourished children (adapted from WHO guidelines) Indian Pediatr. 2007;44:443–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. World Health Organization . Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aguayo VM, Agarwal V, Agnani M, Agrawal D, Bhambhal S, Rawat A, et al. Integrated program achieves good survival but moderate recovery rates among children with severe acute malnutrition in India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1335–1342. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.054080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Aguayo VM, Jacob S, Badgaiyan N, Chandra P, Kumar A, Singh K. Providing care for children with severe acute malnutrition in India: new evidence from Jharkhand. Public Health Nutrition. 2014;17:206–211. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh K, Badgaiyan N, Ranjan A, Dixit HO, Kaushik A, Kushwaha KP, et al. Management of children with severe acute malnutrition. Experience of Nutrition Rehabilitation Centers in Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:21–25. doi: 10.1007/s13312-014-0328-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. World Health Organization (WHO) Guideline: Updates on the Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) WHO Child Growth Standards and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. A Joint Statement by WHO and UNICEF. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Pædiatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Updates of the Guidelines on the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI). Evidence and Recommendations for Future Adaptations. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. The Sphere Project . Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response: 2011 Edition. Books for Change: Bangalore, India; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins S, Sadler K, Dent N, Khara T, Guerrero S, Myatt M, et al. Key issues in the success of community-based management of severe malnutrition. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2006;27:S49–S82. doi: 10.1177/15648265060273S304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Field Exchange Special focus on government experiences of community management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) scale up Emergency Nutrition Network: Oxford, UK; 2012. Issue 43. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kapil U. Ready to use therapeutic food in the management of severe acute malnutrition in India. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:381–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sachdev HPS, Kapil U, Vir S. Consensus statement: National Consensus Workshop on Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) through Medical Nutrition Therapy. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:661–665. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0097-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Prasad V, Sinha D, Sridhar S. Falling between two stools. Operational inconsistencies between ICDS and NRHM in the management of severe malnutrition. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:181–185. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0053-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Swaminathan MS.Undernutrition in infants and young children in India. A leadership agenda for action Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Bulletin. Lifting the curse: Overcoming persistent undernutrition in India200940103–110. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kapil U, Sachdev HPS. Management of children with severe acute malnutrition: a national priority. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:651–653. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES