TABLE 5 ] .
Data Source | Benefits | Limitations | Typical Use (Example) |
Administrative | Commonly available across institutions for large groups of patients No new data collection required |
Delay in coding (not real time) Limited granularity Potential for coding errors |
Structure (staffing ratio12) Process (RBC transfusion58) Outcome (length of stay) Cost (cost/d4) |
Manual chart abstraction | Good detail on focused areas Can translate free text from chart into more-structured data |
Resource intensive per chart reviewed Limited scalability Depends on clinician documentation |
Process (antibiotic administration for sepsis52) Outcome (length of stay) |
EMR extraction | Larger population More discrete clinical data Potential to automate measurement, reducing ongoing resource utilization (more efficient in the long run) Potential real-time assessment |
Depends on clinician documentation Initial development cost Advance system planning required (eg, variables, data repositories) Balance between discrete data and narrative |
Process (antibiotic administration for sepsis52) Outcome (length of stay) |
Survey | Provides data commonly not present in the medical record May be scaled depending on scope of project |
Respondent burden Limited ability to integrate into other data reporting |
Structure (staffing ratio12) Outcome (patient satisfaction71) |
Ancillary system (eg, infection surveillance and adverse event reporting systems) | Provide information commonly not present in medical records | Challenging to integrate with other systems for data gathering and reporting purposes Initial cost to develop system |
Outcome (CLABSI36) Outcome (unplanned extubation35) |
EMR = electronic medical record. See Table 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviation.