Abstract
Omenn syndrome is a primary immunodeficiency disorder, featuring susceptibility to infections and autoreactive T cells and resulting from defective genomic rearrangement of genes for the T cell and B cell receptors. The most frequent etiologies are hypomorphic mutations in “non-core” regions of the Rag1 or Rag2 genes, the protein products of which are critical members of the cellular apparatus for V(D)J recombination. In this report, we describe an infant with Omenn syndrome with a previously unreported termination mutation (p.R142*) in Rag1 on one allele and a partially characterized substitution mutation (p.V779M) in a “core” region of the other Rag1 allele. Using a cellular recombination assay, we found that while the p.R142* mutation completely abolished V(D)J recombination activity, the p.V779M mutation conferred a severe, but not total, loss of V(D)J recombination activity. The recombination defect of the V779 mutant was not due to overall misfolding of Rag1, however, as this mutant supported wild-type levels of V(D)J cleavage. These findings provide insight into the role of this poorly understood region of Rag1 and support the role of Rag1 in a post-cleavage stage of recombination.
Introduction
During the development of B cells and T cells, a diverse repertoire of antigen receptor genes are assembled from multiple component gene segments in a process known as V(D)J recombination [1]. Each of these gene segments is marked by a recombination signal sequence (RSS) that is recognized by a complex of the lymphoid-specific proteins Rag1 and Rag2. Together, Rag1 and Rag2 initiate V(D)J recombination by cleaving DNA to generate double-strand breaks consisting of two hairpinned coding ends and two blunt signal ends [2]. The ubiquitously expressed non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) proteins then collaborate with the Rag proteins to rejoin the cleaved DNA molecules, generating precise signal joints and imprecise coding joints [3].
Since antigen receptor gene assembly is required for the proper development of B cells and T cells, mutations that disrupt V(D)J recombination can lead to impaired immune function. Omenn Syndrome (OMIM 603554) is an autosomal recessive variant of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) with distinctive clinical features of generalized erythodermia, hepatosplenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy [4]. All patients with SCID are susceptible to infections from common bacteria and viruses as well as opportunistic and fungal pathogens. Unlike patients with classical SCID, patients with Omenn Syndrome have circulating T cells with an abnormal phenotype: they are typically poorly reactive, oligoclonal, and display cell-surface markers of previous activation [5]. B cells are typically absent or low and IgG levels are generally low while IgE levels are high.
Omenn Syndrome can be caused by mutations in Rag1 and Rag2 [6], or rarely by mutations in the NHEJ factor Artemis [7], in the IL-7 receptor alpha chain [8] or in the RNase mitochondrial RNA processing (RMRP) gene [9]. For many patients with Omenn Syndrome, the genetic defect remains unidentified [10]. In general, hypomorphic Rag mutations produce Omenn Syndrome, while null mutations produce T–B—SCID [11,12]. Interestingly, siblings with identical Rag mutations have developed either SCID or Omenn syndrome, suggesting that genetic or environmental effects can modify the phenotype of these disorders [12,13,14]. It has been suggested that early infections may be one factor that leads to the expansion of poorly reactive, oligoclonal T cells and the subsequent development of Omenn Syndrome instead of SCID [15]. Finally, hypomorphic Rag mutations can also cause a distinct SCID phenotype with an expanded pool of γδ T cells [16], combined immunodeficiency with granulomatous disease with or without autoimmunity [17,18], or autoimmune disease of varying severity [19,20,21].
Here, we report a boy with Omenn syndrome diagnosed at ~17 weeks of age. We discovered a maternally-inherited nonsense mutation on one allele of the Rag1 gene. A missense mutation was identified on the other allele in a poorly characterized region of the Rag1 protein. To evaluate this mutation, we performed cellular V(D)J recombination assays, revealing that the maternal nonsense mutation is null, and the paternal missense mutation is severely hypomorphic. However, biochemical assays demonstrate that the paternal missense mutation does not affect catalysis of V(D)J cleavage in vitro, supporting that hypomorphic Rag1 activity in the post-cleavage stages of recombination is sufficient to confer susceptibility to Omenn Syndrome.
Materials and Methods
Clinical laboratory tests
Immunoglobulin levels and PRP and tetanus titers were determined by nephelometry at the Boston Children’s Hospital Chemistry Lab. Pneumococcal titers were determined by the Luminex method at ARUP Reference Laboratory. T cell subsets were determined in the Boston Children’s Hospital Immunology Lab by flow cytometry. T cell proliferations were determined at the University of Iowa using [3H]-thymidine incorporation during the last 24 hours of a 5-day culture. The control numbers for proliferations refer to an internal laboratory control; shipping controls were comparable. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Boston Children’s Hospital. Both parents gave written informed consent.
TCR spectratype assay
TCR spectratype (TCR-CDR3 length analysis) was performed with 24 TCR Vβ subfamily specific primers as well as CB primers as described previously[22]. Scoring of CDR3 profiles was performed by determining the number of contracted Vβ CDR3 size profiles in each subject's T cell CDR3 repertoire. Contracted profiles were defined as follows: oligoclonal (2–4 peaks), monoclonal (1 peak), or absent (no peaks detectable).
DNA sequencing
Gene sequencing was performed using standard techniques (GeneDx, Inc.). Sequences were analyzed using Sequencher software (Gene Codes Corporation). The reference DNA and protein sequences for Rag1 are from NIH RefSeq NM_000448.2 and NP_000439.1, respectively, and Rag2 from NM_000536.3 and NP_000527.2, respectively. Nucleotide numbering starts with 1 at the A of the ATG translation initiation codon.
Other sequencing results were identified in this patient: A homozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was identified in Rag1, c.2459A>G which codes for p.Lys820Arg (NIH RefSNP accession rs2227973). Two homozygous, non-synonymous, coding-region SNPs were found on Rag2, p.Val154Ala (RefSNP accession rs17852002) and p.Met322Thr (RefSNP accession rs17856658).
Antibodies and plasmids
Antibodies used in this study were: anti-HA (clone HA-7, Sigma); anti-FLAG (clone M2, Sigma); anti-alpha Tubulin (clone DM1A, Abcam); and sheep anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked whole antibody (GE Healthcare). pGG49, pGG51, p3xFLAG-Rag2, and pcDNA6-myc-hisA-Rag1 were described previously [23]. Point mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene).
Extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination assays
Extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination assays were performed in Br3neo human fibroblastoid cells as described previously [24], using either pGG49 (signal-joint formation) or pGG51 (coding-joint formation) as the reporter [25]. Briefly, we transfected human fibroblast cells with murine full-length Rag1, murine full-length Rag2, and a plasmid reporter substrate and harvested the cells at 48-hours post-transfection. The plasmid DNA encodes the gene for ampicillin (Amp) resistance, and further encodes a chloramphenicol (Cam) resistance gene preceded by a transcriptional terminator flanked by recombination signal sequences. Proper recombination confers Cam resistance. The plasmid DNA was isolated from the harvested cells and transformed into bacteria. V(D)J recombination frequency was measured by comparing the number of AmpR/CamR colonies to the number of AmpR colonies [26]. Full-length Rag2 was transiently expressed using the p3xFLAG-CMV vector (Sigma). Wildtype Rag1, Rag1V779M, and Rag1R142* were transiently expressed using the pcDNA6-myc-hisA vector (Invitrogen). Expression of all proteins was confirmed by Western analysis.
Proteins
Recombinant FLAG-tagged full-length Rag2 was expressed by transient transfection of 293T cells and purified as described previously [27]. Recombinant wild-type core Rag1 (aa 387–1011) and Rag1V779M were purified from Escherichia coli as described previously [28].
In vitro V(D)J cleavage assays
Rag1 and Rag1V779M were used for in vitro V(D)J cleavage assays as described previously [29]. Briefly, Rag1 (80 ng) and Rag2 (10 ng) were added to a 10 μL reaction mixture containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 2 mM dithiothreitol, 60 mM potassium glutamate, 1 mM MnCl2, and 0.25 pmol of 32P-labeled DNA substrate. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 2 hours, stopped with 95% formamide loading dye, separated by super-denaturing gel electrophoresis, and visualized by autoradiography.
Results
Clinical characteristics and laboratory findings
P1 was born at term to non-consanguineous parents. Starting at one month of age, he developed recurrent, waxing and waning, scaling erythroderma with recurrent skin infections requiring oral antibiotics. At approximately 4 months, due to progression of his rash, he was referred to a dermatologist and underwent a skin biopsy, which showed acute micro-vesiculating, spongiotic dermatitis, dermal inflammation, and eosinophils. At 4.5 months of age, physical examination revealed global erythroderma, sparse, friable hair, generalized lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly. Comèl-Netherton syndrome was ruled out by microscopic examination of scalp and eyelash hairs. Laboratory evaluation revealed hypoalbuminemia, peripheral eosinophilia, profound hypogammaglobulinemia, elevated IgE, absent isohemaglutinnins, and lack of specific antibody production (Table 1). Lymphocyte subset analysis showed 73% CD3+ T cells (absolute 3,015/μL), absent B cells, and 27% NK cells. The number of CD8+ T cells was mildly decreased and his CD4/CD8 ratio was elevated (Table 1). T cell proliferative responses to mitogens were severely depressed (Table 1), indicating a SCID-like disorder. Maternal engraftment was ruled out by analysis of micro-satellite markers by PCR (data not shown). A clinical diagnosis of Omenn Syndrome was made, supported by the finding of oligoclonal/monoclonal TCR beta chains by spectratype analysis (Fig 1). In addition, his CD4+ T cells showed an activated, memory phenotype, expressing CD45-RO and HLA-DR on 96% and 94% of cells, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1. Peripheral blood analysis of P1 at time of initial presentation (age 4½ months) is consistent with Omenn’s Syndrome.
Patient | Normal | |
---|---|---|
Blood counts | ||
White blood cell count (cells/μL) | 16,270 | 7,000–16,000 |
Absolute lymphocyte count (cells/μL) | 4,130 | 3,900–9,000 |
Absolute eosinophil count (cells/μL) | 5,710 | 0–400 |
Lymphocyte populations % (cells/μL) | (10th to 90th percentile) | |
CD3 | 73% (3,015) | 51–77% (2,500–5,600) |
CD4 (CD3 pos) | 67% (2,767) | 35–56% (1,800–4,000) |
CD8 (CD3 pos) | 8% (330) | 12–23% (5,90–1,600) |
CD19 | 0% (0) | 5–10% |
CD16 (CD3 neg) | 27% (1,115) | 5–15% |
CD3 HLA-DR+ | 94% | 2–10% |
CD3 CD45-RO | 96% | 3–16% |
Immunoglobulins | ||
IgG (mg/dL) | 137 | 200–1200 |
IgA (mg/dL) | <7 | 5–46 |
IgM (mg/dL) | 52 | 10–90 |
IgE (IU/mL) | 5,550 | 10–30 |
Lymphocyte proliferation | ||
Background (cpm ± std) | 134 +/- 37 | 1,012 +/- 566 |
ConA (cpm ± std) | 2,133 +/- 600 | 86,229 +/- 16,286 |
PHA (cpm ± std) | 4,140 +/- 532 | 83,383 +/- 6,314 |
PWM (cpm ± std) | 10,100 +/- 1,560 | 63,575 +/- 4,996 |
Background (cpm ± std) | 94 +/- 25 | 495 +/- 180 |
Tetanus (cpm ± std) | 445 +/- 30 | 14,213 +/- 3,528 |
Candida (cpm ± std) | 309 +/- 214 | 24,937 +/- 5,727 |
Normal values from the Children’s Hospital Laboratory, the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Laboratory, or from reference [30].
At age 6.3 months, this patient underwent a T cell-depleted, HLA single-antigen mismatched, paternal peripheral blood transplant at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Chemotherapeutic cytoreduction was achieved with intravenous busulfan (16 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg). He received two doses of alemtuzumab (10 mg/m2/dose) prior to transplant for prophylaxis against graft rejection. Stem cells were depleted of T cells by CD34-positive selection followed by rosetting with sheep red blood cells. He received a total of 30.4 x 106 CD34 cells/kg and 3.2 x 103 CD3 cells/kg. Early post-transplant complications consisted of mucositis and persistent skin rash, which resolved by one month following HSCT. At approximately one-year after HSCT, he developed isolated severe myositis, presumed to reflect chronic GVHD, which required prolonged mechanical ventilation and treatment with steroids and cyclosporine A. He ultimately recovered, was able to breathe on his own, and was weaned off mechanical ventilation and immunosuppressive therapy. He has had no recurrence of his myositis. He was clinically well at age 5 years, when he was lost to follow-up. He has normal in vitro T cell function and specific antibody production following vaccination for Tetanus, Haemophilus influenzae, Pneumococcus, and polio virus.
Termination mutation in Rag1 (p.R142*)
On the basis of the patient history, physical exam, and laboratory findings, we diagnosed P1 with Omenn Syndrome. To determine the molecular etiology, we sequenced the Rag1 and Rag2 genes. In addition to previously characterized polymorphisms (see Methods), P1 had a heterozygous nonsense mutation in Rag1 (c. 424C>T) (Fig 2A) resulting in an abnormal stop codon at p.Arg142Ter (Fig 2B). Sequencing of the mother’s genomic DNA revealed that this mutation was maternally inherited (data not shown).
Arg 142 is located within basic region I (aa 142–147) in the N-terminal “non-core” portion of Rag1. Assuming canonical start codon usage [31], truncation of the mRNA at this position would either result in nonsense-mediated decay of the transcript, or else could result in loss of >86% of the protein, including the core portion of the protein (aa 384–1008) that is essential for V(D)J recombination. Therefore, this nonsense mutation likely creates a null maternal allele.
Missense mutation in Rag1 (p.V779M)
In addition to the maternal nonsense mutation, P1 also harbored a heterozygous missense mutation in Rag1 (c.2335G>A) on the paternal allele (Fig 2C), resulting in the non-conserved amino acid substitution of p.Val779Met (Fig 2D). Val 779 is located within the core portion of Rag1, between zinc finger B (aa 728–753) and basic region IV (aa 829–843). Since Val 779 does not fall within any known Rag1 functional motifs, it was unclear whether this mutation would affect the function of the Rag1/2 complex.
Rag1R142* is a null mutant and Rag1V779M is a hypomorphic mutant
To test whether the p.R142* and p.V779M mutations impairs the function of Rag1, we examined the ability of Rag1R142* and Rag1V779M to perform V(D)J recombination in cultured human cells using an extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination assay[24]. Fibroblast cell lines were then transfected with an expression vector encoding for either full-length wild-type Rag1, Rag1V779M, or Rag1R142*, plus both full-length Rag2 and an exogenous recombination substrate to detect either signal joints (pGG49) or coding joints (pGG51) [29]. Despite being expressed at comparable levels to wild-type Rag1 (Fig 3A), Rag1V779M exhibited a dramatic deficiency (>99%) in V(D)J recombination activity (Fig 3B and 3C). Nonetheless, some residual activity was observed. The deficiency was observed on both types of substrates tested: those that form signal joints (0.73% of wild-type) and those that form coding joints (0.18% of wild-type) (Fig 3B and 3D). Although it has been reported that premature stop codons in the N-terminal region of Rag1 can be rescued by internal methionine usage [31], we observed no V(D)J recombination activity for Rag1R142* (Fig 3B), and we were unable to detect expression of the Rag1R142* protein. Therefore, the p.R142* mutation observed in P1 creates a null allele, while the p.V779M substitution observed in P1 is a hypomorphic mutation that profoundly impairs Rag1’s ability to catalyze V(D)J recombination.
Rag1V779M is functional in V(D)J cleavage assays in vitro
Having observed that Rag1V779M is deficient in V(D)J recombination activity, we wanted to test whether the p.V779M mutation impairs V(D)J cleavage. To generate a DNA double-strand break at a recombination signal sequence, the Rag1/2 complex must bind to the RSS and then catalyze both nicking and hairpinning. To assay for a defect in one of these steps of V(D)J recombination, we tested the ability of recombinant wild-type and mutant core Rag1 proteins (aa 387–1011) to catalyze V(D)J cleavage in vitro. The recombinant proteins, which expressed and purified equally well (Fig 4A), were incubated with full-length recombinant Rag2 plus a 32P-labeled DNA substrate that contains a recombination signal sequence. Surprisingly, Rag1V779M catalyzed V(D)J cleavage at wild-type levels, generating both nicked and hairpinned products (Fig 4B and 4C). Thus, the p.V779M mutation does not impair Rag1/2-mediated RSS binding or cleavage.
Discussion
We present here an infant boy with Omenn Syndrome bearing compound heterozygous mutations of Rag1: a nonsense mutation on the maternal allele (p.R142*) and a missense mutation on the paternal allele (p.V779M). Functional analysis of these Rag1 alleles revealed that the p.R142* mutation creates a null allele, while the p.V779M substitution is a hypomorphic mutation that severely impairs V(D)J recombination in vivo. However, biochemical analysis demonstrated that the p.V779M substitution does not impair V(D)J cleavage in vitro, indicating that this mutation is not a catalytic mutation.
Mechanism of Omenn Syndrome
Over the past 15 years, many different Rag mutations have been shown to cause Omenn Syndrome [6,13,32,33,34]. Indeed, more than 90% of Omenn Syndrome cases are attributable to hypomorphic mutations in Rag1 and Rag2 [35]. These hypomorphic Rag mutants can be broadly classified into two categories: those that exhibit impaired V(D)J cleavage in vitro—for example, mutants that are impaired in Rag1-Rag2 complex formation [11,36,37], DNA binding[11], or RSS nicking [38]; those that exhibit wild-type V(D)J cleavage activity in vitro but impaired V(D)J recombination in vivo—for example, mutants that are impaired in chromatin-binding [23,39] or in rejoining the broken DNA ends generated during V(D)J cleavage [40,41,42,43].
P1’s nonsense mutation on the maternal allele (p.R142*) would, if translated, remove all of the functional regions in Rag1 described above. As such, it either produces a severely truncated, nonfunctional protein or the message is deleted by nonsense-mediated decay. Therefore, the p.R142* mutation clearly falls in the first category of mutations that impair both V(D)J cleavage in vitro and V(D)J recombination in vivo.
P1’s missense mutation on the paternal allele (p.V779M) is more interesting in that it appears to leave the previously described functional regions of Rag1 intact (Fig 5), and yet, it severely impairs V(D)J recombination (Fig 3). The simplest explanation for this phenotype would be that the p.V779M substitution disrupts V(D)J recombination by causing misfolding of the protein, similar to other Rag1 mutants [44]. However, our in vitro V(D)J cleavage assays demonstrate that Rag1V779M is fully functional in V(D)J cleavage, arguing against any substantial defect in protein folding. While a previous study suggested that Rag1V779M might be modestly impaired in 12-RSS nicking in vitro [38], we found no apparent defect in the catalytic activity of this mutant. Although it is difficult to account for differences in protein purifications and experimental assay conditions, based on the robust cleavage activity that we observed, we would argue that the p.V779M mutation likely falls in the second category of mutations that exhibit wild-type V(D)J cleavage activity in vitro, but impaired V(D)J recombination in vivo. It is possible that Rag1V779M is deficient in V(D)J recombination because it fails to interact with some key regulatory factor in vivo, and is therefore deficient in coupled cleavage, analogous to the Rag2 mutations described in other Omenn Syndrome patients [23,45]. Alternatively, it is possible that Rag1V779M impairs the rejoining of the broken DNA ends generated during V(D)J cleavage. Along these lines, it is interesting to note that Rag1V779M is more severely impaired in coding joint formation than it is in signal joint formation (Fig 3D), suggesting that Rag1V779M may be a joining-deficient mutant that affects the post-cleavage stage of V(D)J recombination, analogous to previously identified Rag mutants [40,41,42,43]. Future studies will test the hypothesis that hypofunctional Rag1 and Rag2 mutants can confer susceptibility to Omenn Syndrome by impairing the post-cleavage stage of V(D)J recombination.
Function of the Rag1 C-terminal domain
Previous studies using limited proteolysis have identified two potential domains within the core portion of human Rag1: the central domain (aa 531–763); and the C-terminal domain (aa 764–983) [46]. There are four known functional elements within the Rag1 C-terminal domain: basic region IV (aa 829–843), which binds to the nuclear transport protein Rch1 [47]; the nuclear localization signal (aa 972–976) [48]; E965, which is one of three key active site residues [49,50]; and two zinc-binding sites (C905/C907 and H940/H945) [51]. Although P1’s missense mutation (p.V779M) lies within the Rag1 C-terminal domain, and dramatically affects V(D)J recombination in vivo, it does not affect any of the known functional elements in this region. Does V779 lie within a new functional region of the Rag1 C-terminal domain? A recent study took a systematic approach to correlate the recombination activity of mutant human Rag1 proteins to the clinical and immunological presentation of the patients harboring these mutations [52]. Intriguingly, this study found several other mutations flanking V779 that also dramatically impaired V(D)J recombination in vivo: p.R764P; p.Y768*, p.E770K, p.R778W, and p.R786L. In light of these findings, it is tempting to speculate that V779 lies within a functionally significant region of the Rag1 C-terminal domain, possibly facilitating the proper repair of signal ends and coding ends via the classical non-homologous end-joining pathway.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health K08 AI079268 (MJB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Bassing CH, Swat W, Alt FW. The mechanism and regulation of chromosomal V(D)J recombination. Cell. 2002; 109 Suppl: S45–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gellert M. V(D)J recombination: RAG proteins, repair factors, and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002; 71: 101–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Gent DC, van der Burg M. Non-homologous end-joining, a sticky affair. Oncogene. 2007; 26: 7731–7740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Omenn GS. Familial Reticuloendotheliosis with Eosinophilia. N Engl J Med. 1965; 273: 427–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. de Saint-Basile G, Le Deist F, de Villartay JP, Cerf-Bensussan N, Journet O, Brousse N, et al. Restricted heterogeneity of T lymphocytes in combined immunodeficiency with hypereosinophilia (Omenn's syndrome). J Clin Invest. 1991; 87: 1352–1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Villa A, Santagata S, Bozzi F, Imberti L, Notarangelo LD. Omenn syndrome: a disorder of Rag1 and Rag2 genes. J Clin Immunol. 1999; 19: 87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ege M, Ma Y, Manfras B, Kalwak K, Lu H, Lieber MR, et al. Omenn syndrome due to ARTEMIS mutations. Blood. 2005; 105: 4179–4186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giliani S, Bonfim C, de Saint Basile G, Lanzi G, Brousse N, Koliski A, et al. Omenn syndrome in an infant with IL7RA gene mutation. J Pediatr. 2006; 148: 272–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Roifman CM, Gu Y, Cohen A. Mutations in the RNA component of RNase mitochondrial RNA processing might cause Omenn syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 117: 897–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gennery AR, Hodges E, Williams AP, Harris S, Villa A, Angus B, et al. Omenn's syndrome occurring in patients without mutations in recombination activating genes. Clin Immunol. 2005; 116: 246–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Villa A, Santagata S, Bozzi F, Giliani S, Frattini A, Imberti L, et al. Partial V(D)J recombination activity leads to Omenn syndrome. Cell. 1998; 93: 885–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Villa A, Sobacchi C, Notarangelo LD, Bozzi F, Abinun M, Abrahamsen TG, et al. V(D)J recombination defects in lymphocytes due to RAG mutations: severe immunodeficiency with a spectrum of clinical presentations. Blood. 2001; 97: 81–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Corneo B, Moshous D, Gungor T, Wulffraat N, Philippet P, Le Deist FL, et al. Identical mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 genes leading to defective V(D)J recombinase activity can cause either T-B-severe combined immune deficiency or Omenn syndrome. Blood. 2001; 97: 2772–2776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Honig M, Schwarz K. Omenn syndrome: a lack of tolerance on the background of deficient lymphocyte development and maturation. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006; 18: 383–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dalal I, Tabori U, Bielorai B, Golan H, Rosenthal E, Amariglio N, et al. Evolution of a T-B- SCID into an Omenn syndrome phenotype following parainfluenza 3 virus infection. Clin Immunol. 2005; 115: 70–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. de Villartay JP, Lim A, Al-Mousa H, Dupont S, Dechanet-Merville J, Coumau-Gatbois E, et al. A novel immunodeficiency associated with hypomorphic RAG1 mutations and CMV infection. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 3291–3299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. De Ravin SS, Cowen EW, Zarember KA, Whiting-Theobald NL, Kuhns DB, Sandler NG, et al. Hypomorphic Rag mutations can cause destructive midline granulomatous disease. Blood. 2010; 116: 1263–1271. 10.1182/blood-2010-02-267583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Schuetz C, Huck K, Gudowius S, Megahed M, Feyen O, Hubner B, et al. An immunodeficiency disease with RAG mutations and granulomas. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2030–2038. 10.1056/NEJMoa073966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Henderson LA, Frugoni F, Hopkins G, de Boer H, Pai SY, Lee YN, et al. Expanding the spectrum of recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency: a family with early-onset autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 132: 969–971 e961–962. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schuetz C, Pannicke U, Jacobsen EM, Burggraf S, Albert MH, Honig M, et al. Lesson from hypomorphic recombination-activating gene (RAG) mutations: Why asymptomatic siblings should also be tested. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133: 1211–1215. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen K, Wu W, Mathew D, Zhang Y, Browne SK, Rosen LB, et al. Autoimmunity due to RAG deficiency and estimated disease incidence in RAG1/2 mutations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133: 880–882 e810. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yawalkar N, Ferenczi K, Jones DA, Yamanaka K, Suh KY, Sadat S, et al. Profound loss of T-cell receptor repertoire complexity in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2003; 102: 4059–4066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Matthews AG, Kuo AJ, Ramon-Maiques S, Han S, Champagne KS, Ivanov D, et al. RAG2 PHD finger couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with V(D)J recombination. Nature. 2007; 450: 1106–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dai Y, Kysela B, Hanakahi LA, Manolis K, Riballo E, Stumm M, et al. Nonhomologous end joining and V(D)J recombination require an additional factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 2462–2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gauss GH, Lieber MR. Unequal signal and coding joint formation in human V(D)J recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13: 3900–3906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Oettinger MA, Schatz DG, Gorka C, Baltimore D. RAG-1 and RAG-2, adjacent genes that synergistically activate V(D)J recombination. Science. 1990; 248: 1517–1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Elkin SK, Ivanov D, Ewalt M, Ferguson CG, Hyberts SG, Sun ZY, et al. A PHD finger motif in the C terminus of RAG2 modulates recombination activity. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 28701–28710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Matthews AG, Elkin SK, Oettinger MA. Ordered DNA release and target capture in RAG transposition. Embo J. 2004; 23: 1198–1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kim DR, Oettinger MA. Functional analysis of coordinated cleavage in V(D)J recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 4679–4688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Shearer WT, Rosenblatt HM, Gelman RS, Oyomopito R, Plaeger S, Stiehm ER, et al. Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children from birth through 18 years of age: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1009 study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 112: 973–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Santagata S, Gomez CA, Sobacchi C, Bozzi F, Abinun M, Pasic S, et al. N-terminal RAG1 frameshift mutations in Omenn's syndrome: internal methionine usage leads to partial V(D)J recombination activity and reveals a fundamental role in vivo for the N-terminal domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 14572–14577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Somech R, Simon AJ, Lev A, Dalal I, Spirer Z, Goldstein I, et al. Reduced central tolerance in Omenn syndrome leads to immature self-reactive oligoclonal T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009; 124: 793–800. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sobacchi C, Marrella V, Rucci F, Vezzoni P, Villa A. RAG-dependent primary immunodeficiencies. Hum Mutat. 2006; 27: 1174–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Niehues T, Perez-Becker R, Schuetz C. More than just SCID—the phenotypic range of combined immunodeficiencies associated with mutations in the recombinase activating genes (RAG) 1 and 2. Clin Immunol. 2010; 135: 183–192. 10.1016/j.clim.2010.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Marrella V, Maina V, Villa A. Omenn syndrome does not live by V(D)J recombination alone. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 11: 525–531. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32834c311a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gomez CA, Ptaszek LM, Villa A, Bozzi F, Sobacchi C, Brooks EG, et al. Mutations in conserved regions of the predicted RAG2 kelch repeats block initiation of V(D)J recombination and result in primary immunodeficiencies. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 5653–5664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Corneo B, Moshous D, Callebaut I, de Chasseval R, Fischer A, de Villartay JP. Three-dimensional clustering of human RAG2 gene mutations in severe combined immune deficiency. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 12672–12675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Santagata S, Besmer E, Villa A, Bozzi F, Allingham JS, Sobacchi C, et al. The RAG1/RAG2 complex constitutes a 3' flap endonuclease: implications for junctional diversity in V(D)J and transpositional recombination. Mol Cell. 1999; 4: 935–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liu Y, Subrahmanyam R, Chakraborty T, Sen R, Desiderio S. A plant homeodomain in RAG-2 that binds Hypermethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 is necessary for efficient antigen-receptor-gene rearrangement. Immunity. 2007; 27: 561–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Qiu JX, Kale SB, Yarnell Schultz H, Roth DB. Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination. Mol Cell. 2001; 7: 77–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yarnell Schultz H, Landree MA, Qiu JX, Kale SB, Roth DB. Joining-deficient RAG1 mutants block V(D)J recombination in vivo and hairpin opening in vitro. Mol Cell. 2001; 7: 65–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tsai CL, Drejer AH, Schatz DG. Evidence of a critical architectural function for the RAG proteins in end processing, protection, and joining in V(D)J recombination. Genes Dev. 2002; 16: 1934–1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Corneo B, Wendland RL, Deriano L, Cui X, Klein IA, Wong SY, et al. Rag mutations reveal robust alternative end joining. Nature. 2007; 449: 483–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Simkus C, Anand P, Bhattacharyya A, Jones JM. Biochemical and folding defects in a RAG1 variant associated with Omenn syndrome. J Immunol. 2007; 179: 8332–8340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ramon-Maiques S, Kuo AJ, Carney D, Matthews AG, Oettinger MA, Gozani O, et al. The plant homeodomain finger of RAG2 recognizes histone H3 methylated at both lysine-4 and arginine-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 18993–18998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Arbuckle JL, Fauss LA, Simpson R, Ptaszek LM, Rodgers KK. Identification of two topologically independent domains in RAG1 and their role in macromolecular interactions relevant to V(D)J recombination. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 37093–37101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Cuomo CA, Kirch SA, Gyuris J, Brent R, Oettinger MA. Rch1, a protein that specifically interacts with the RAG-1 recombination-activating protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 6156–6160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Spanopoulou E, Cortes P, Shih C, Huang CM, Silver DP, Svec P, et al. Localization, interaction, and RNA binding properties of the V(D)J recombination-activating proteins RAG1 and RAG2. Immunity. 1995; 3: 715–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Landree MA, Wibbenmeyer JA, Roth DB. Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 3059–3069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kim DR, Dai Y, Mundy CL, Yang W, Oettinger MA. Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 3070–3080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gwyn LM, Peak MM, De P, Rahman NS, Rodgers KK. A zinc site in the C-terminal domain of RAG1 is essential for DNA cleavage activity. J Mol Biol. 2009; 390: 863–878. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lee YN, Frugoni F, Dobbs K, Walter JE, Giliani S, Gennery AR, et al. A systematic analysis of recombination activity and genotype-phenotype correlation in human recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133: 1099–1108. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.