Abstract
Objective
Unlike other herpes viruses, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) is not ubiquitous worldwide and is most prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. The reasons for this are unclear. As part of a wider investigation of factors that facilitate transmission in Uganda, a high prevalence country, we examined the association between antimalaria antibodies and seropositivity against KSHV.
Methods
Antibodies against P. falciparum merozoite surface protein (PfMSP)-1, P. falciparum apical membrane antigen (PfAMA)-1 and KSHV antigens (ORF73 and K8.1) were measured in samples from 1164 mothers and 1227 children.
Results
Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus seroprevalence was 69% among mothers and 15% children. Among mothers, KSHV seroprevalence increased with malaria antibody titres: from 60% to 82% and from 54% to 77%, comparing those with the lowest and highest titres for PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1, respectively (P < 0.0001). Among children, only antibodies to PfAMA-1 were significantly associated with KSHV seropositivity, (P < 0.0001). In both mothers and children, anti-ORF73 antibodies were more strongly associated with malaria antibodies than anti-K8.1 antibodies.
Conclusion
The association between malaria exposure and KSHV seropositivity suggests that malaria is a cofactor for KSHV infection or reactivation.
Keywords: Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus, malaria, Uganda
Introduction
Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) is the causative agent of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) [1,2]. In general, the distribution of KSHV mirrors the distribution of KS [3]. Unlike other herpes viruses that are ubiquitous in human populations, KSHV and KS demonstrate substantial geographical variation worldwide [4]. The prevalence of KSHV is highest in sub-Saharan Africa, followed by the Mediterranean countries, and prevalence is lowest in Northern European and Asian countries [5]. The principal modes of transmission of KSHV may also differ between geographical locations [6]. In sub-Saharan Africa, KSHV transmission occurs through saliva throughout life, but particularly in childhood [3]. In low prevalence settings transmission mainly occurs later in life, perhaps through sexual contact [3].
As all other known human herpes viruses are ubiquitous worldwide, the geographic variation in prevalence of KSHV is anomalous and the factors that sustain higher rates of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere are unclear. In a cross-sectional study of women, hookworm infection, Mansonella perstans and malaria parasitaemia were independently associated with KSHV seropositivity; in children, only malaria parasitaemia showed an association with KSHV seropositivity, but prevalence of the other parasites was very low [7,8]. Helminths skew the immune response to a Th2 response and cause immunosuppression [9,10]; this immunosuppression could lead to loss of viral control and could consequently cause viral replication. Malaria infection impairs the T-cell immune response and causes polyclonal activation of B cells [11,12]. Both malaria and helminth infections could lead to KSHV reactivation in co-infected individuals.
Repeated malaria exposure has detrimental effects on immune function [13–16]. These could lead to loss of immune surveillance of KSHV latently infected cells, consequently causing viral reactivation and replication. The effect of intense malaria exposure on EBV reactivation (a related gamma herpesvirus) has been investigated, and it was shown that exposure to malaria facilitates EBV transmission [17]. Individuals in areas with high malaria transmission in Kenya were more likely to be EBV seropositive and were at higher risk of Burkitt's lymphoma than individuals in areas with low malaria transmission in Kenya [17,18]. Together, this suggests that malaria impacts not just transmission of EBV, but also the immune response to infection; the same may be true in relation to KSHV and KS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of malaria exposure, determined by measurement of antimalaria antibodies, on KSHV seropositivity in Ugandan mothers and their children.
Methods
Study design and population
This was a cross-sectional study carried out within the context of a clinical trial, the Entebbe Mother and Baby study (EMaBS) (ISRCTN32849447). EMaBS is an ongoing birth cohort that originated as a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial designed to determine the impact of helminth infections and their treatment on vaccine responses and infectious diseases outcomes; the details have been reported elsewhere [19,20]. A total of 2507 pregnant women from Entebbe, Uganda, who consented, were recruited into EMaBS and they have been followed, with their children, for 10 years.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Science and Ethics Committee (SEC) of the Uganda Virus Research Institute, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee.
KSHV Serology
Stored plasma samples taken from 1164 mothers in the early post-partum period, and from 1227 of their 5-year old children, were screened for the presence of KSHV antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for recombinant proteins to a lytic structural glycoprotein, K8.1 and a latent nuclear protein latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) encoded by ORF73. Each plate contained three positive and three negative controls. Each assay cut-off was calculated based on the performance of the negative controls. This procedure has been reported elsewhere [21,22].
Malaria serology
The same plasma samples were tested for malaria antibodies using two P. falciparum antigens: merozoite surface protein (MSP)-1 and apical membrane antigen (AMA)-1 [23]. A pool of malaria positive plasma samples from patients known to be infected with malaria was used to make standard dilutions. This pool was diluted serially five times starting from 1:50 for MSP-1 and 1:100 for AMA-1 to make six standards with a fourfold dilution increment. Optical densities (ODs) obtained were then exported into Microsoft Excel, and antibody titres for each sample and each antigen were derived from the standard curve, of ODs. Blank wells were used to subtract background absorbance from the standards and the samples. This procedure has been reported elsewhere [24].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata-12 software (STATA® 12.1, Statacorp, College Station, USA). Separately for mothers and children, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel test and logistic regression to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios and P-values; all P-values are two-sided. To determine the effect of malaria antibodies on KSHV seropositivity, we grouped malaria antibody titres into three groups, for mothers and children separately: low, middle and high. The selection of the groups was not based on any biological or clinical criteria but on the frequency distribution of the titres. Antibody titres from below the 25th quartile were grouped as low, from the 25th to 75th quartile as middle and above the 75th quartile as high. As grouping continuous risk factors leads to loss of information [25], we also analysed the effect of malaria antibody titres as a continuous variable.
Results
To determine the level of malaria exposure, we quantified antibody titres to Plasmodium falciparum malaria using two antigens, PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1. As expected, antibody titres to both PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 were much higher in mothers compared to children. The median antibody titres to PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 among mothers were 737.5 and 600.2, respectively, while the median antibody titres to PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 among children were 103.4 and 17.2, respectively. To establish the seroprevalence of KSHV among mothers and their children, we tested for KSHV-specific antibodies using two KSHV antigens, K8.1 and ORF73. Individuals with antibodies to either ORF73 or K8.1 were considered to be KSHV seropositive, and individuals with antibodies to neither ORF73 nor K8.1 were considered to be KSHV seronegative. The seroprevalence of KSHV was 69% (806/1164) among mothers and 15% (185/1227) among children. Among mothers, 64% (744) were positive for anti-ORF73 antibodies and 46% (539) were positive for anti-K8.1 antibodies. Among children, 8% (96) were positive for anti-ORF73 antibodies and 12% (148) were positive for anti-K8.1 antibodies.
Tables 1 and 2 show crude and adjusted associations between KSHV seropositivity, socio-demographic factors and other clinical factors among mothers and children, respectively. Household socioeconomic status and location were independently associated with KSHV seropositivity both in the mothers and in the children [7,8]. Age was crudely associated with KSHV seropositivity (P = 0.01) among mothers, but the association was lost when we adjusted for household socio-economic status and location. Because all children were 5 years old, age was not included in the analysis of children's data.
Table 1.
Risk factor | Prevalence of KSHV among women | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age group | |||||
14–19 | 75% (212/282) | 1 | 0.01 (trend) | 1 | 0.07 (trend) |
20–24 | 69% (299/433) | 0.74 (0.53–1.03) | 0.75 (0.53–1.06) | ||
25–29 | 66% (175/265) | 0.64 (0.44–0.93) | 0.70 (0.47–1.02) | ||
30+ | 65% (120/184) | 0.62 (0.41–0.93) | 0.68 (0.44–1.03) | ||
Household SES | |||||
1 (lowest) | 82% (49/60) | 1 | <0.0001 (trend) | 1 | <0.0001 (trend) |
2 | 75% (77/103) | 0.66 (0.30–1.47) | 0.70 (0.31–1.55) | ||
3 | 72% (254/350) | 0.59 (0.30–1.19) | 0.56 (0.78–1.13) | ||
4 | 68% (228/335) | 0.48 (0.24–0.96) | 0.46 (0.23–0.93) | ||
5 | 65% (145/224) | 0.41 (0.20–0.84) | 0.43 (0.21–0.88) | ||
6 (highest) | 49% (33/67) | 0.22 (0.10–0.49) | 0.22 (0.10–0.49) | ||
Location | |||||
Urban* | 65% (286/439) | 1 | 0.002 (trend) | 1 | 0.002 (trend) |
Peri-urban† | 70% (309/444) | 1.22 (0.92–1.62) | 1.26 (0.94–1.69) | ||
Rural‡ | 76% (206/271) | 1.70 (1.21–2.38) | 1.77 (1.24–2.52) | ||
Tribe | |||||
Buganda | 70% (419/601) | 1 | 0.7 | ||
Other tribes§ | 69% (386/562) | 0.95 (0.74–1.22) | |||
HIV seronegative | 69% (694/1004) | 1 | 0.8 | ||
HIV seropositive | 70% (112/160) | 1.04 (0.72–1.50) | |||
Anaemia | |||||
No | 67% (472/699) | 1 | 0.1 | ||
Yes | 72% (334/465) | 1.23 (0.95–1.59) |
SES (socio-economic status), CI (confidence interval). KSHV seropositive is defined as seropositive to either ORF73, and/or K8.1. A composite variable for household socio-economic status was derived based on home building materials, number of room and items collectively owned.
Adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for age group, household socio-economic status and location.
Urban is Entebbe area.
Peri-urban are Kigungu and Manyago areas.
Rural are Katabi road side and Katabi far from the road areas.
Other tribes include Banyankole, Batoro, Basoga, Luo, Banyarwanda and any other tribes.
Bold values are statistically significant
Table 2.
Risk factor | Prevalence of KSHV among children | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Household SES | |||||
1 (lowest) | 23% (16/71) | 1 | 0.05 (trend) | 1 | 0.04 (trend) |
2 | 18% (14/81) | 0.72 (0.32–1.60) | 0.75 (0.33–1.68) | ||
3 | 16% (60/368) | 0.67 (0.36–1.25) | 0.65 (0.35–1.22) | ||
4 | 12% (43/352) | 0.48 (0.25–0.91) | 0.46 (0.24–0.88) | ||
5 | 15% (38/255) | 0.61 (0.31–1.16) | 0.57 (0.30–1.11) | ||
6 (highest) | 12% (9/78) | 0.45 (0.18–1.09) | 0.44 (0.18–1.08) | ||
Location | |||||
Urban* | 14% (64/463) | 1 | 0.01 (trend) | 1 | 0.01 (trend) |
Peri-Urban† | 13% (65/498) | 0.94 (0.65–1.36) | 0.88 (0.6–1.29) | ||
Rural‡ | 22% (56/255) | 1.75 (1.18–2.61) | 1.80 (1.20–2.69) | ||
Maternal age group | |||||
14–19 | 13% (33/253) | 1 | 0.3 (trend) | ||
20–24 | 16% (76/473) | 1.28 (0.82–1.98) | |||
25–29 | 13% (38/294) | 0.99 (0.60–1.63) | |||
30+ | 19% (38/207) | 1.50 (0.90–2.49) | |||
Sex | |||||
Boys | 16% (101/626) | 1 | 0.3 | ||
Girls | 14% (84/601) | 0.84 (0.62–1.15) | |||
Tribe | |||||
Buganda | 15% (103/683) | 1 | 0.9 | ||
Other tribes§ | 15% (82/544) | 0.99 (0.73–1.37) |
SES (socio-economic status), CI (confidence interval) KSHV seropositive is defined as seropositive to either ORF73 and/or K8.1. A composite variable for household socio-economic status was derived based on home building materials, number of room and items collectively owned.
Adjusted odds ratios adjusted for household socio-economic status and location.
Urban is Entebbe area.
Peri-urban are Kigungu and Manyago areas.
Rural are Katabi road side and Katabi far from the road areas.
Other tribes include Banyankole, Batoro, Basoga, Luo, Banyarwanda and any other tribe. Bold values are statistically significant
Among mothers, malaria antibodies to both PfMSP-1and PfAMA-1 were strongly associated with KSHV seropositivity. The odds of being KSHV seropositive among mothers with high malaria antibody titres, compared to those with low malaria antibody titres, were 2.67 (P < 0.0001) and 2.43 (P < 0.0001) for PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 antibodies, respectively (Table 3). Among children, malaria antibodies to PfAMA-1 were strongly associated with KSHV seropositivity. The odds of being KSHV seropositive among children with high PfAMA-1 antibody titres, compared to those with low PfAMA-1 antibody titres, were 1.59 (P = 0.02) (Table 4). PfMSP-1 antibody titres were not significantly associated with KSHV seropositivity among children (Table 4).
Table 3.
Risk factor | Prevalence of KSHV among women | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PfMSP-1 titres | |||||
Lowest | 60% (174/292) | 1 | <0.0001 | 1 | <0.0001 |
Middle | 68% (394/581) | 1.43 (1.07–1.91) | 1.47 (1.07–2.03) | ||
Highest | 82% (238/291) | 3.05 (2.09–4.45) | 2.67 (1.77–4.04) | ||
PfAMA-1 titres | |||||
Lowest | 54% (158/293) | 1 | <0.0001 | 1 | <0.0001 |
Middle | 73% (423/580) | 2.30 (1.72–3.09) | 2.08 (1.5–2.87) | ||
Highest | 77% (225/291) | 2.91 (2.04–4.17) | 2.43 (1.63–3.62) |
Adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for hookworm infection, Mansonella perstans infection, socio-demographic factors (age group, household socio-economic status, location) and HIV status. PfMSP-1 (Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1), PfAMA-1 (Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen-1), CI (confidence interval) PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 antibody titres were analysed using separate regression models. KSHV seropositive is defined as seropositive to either ORF73 and/or K8.1.Bold values are statistically significant
Table 4.
Risk factor | Prevalence of KSHV among children | Crude odds ratios (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PfMSP-1 titres | |||||
Lowest | 14% (42/307) | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.4 |
Middle | 15% (89/614) | 1.07 (0.72–1.59) | 1.05 (0.70–1.56) | ||
Highest | 18% (54/306) | 1.35 (0.87–2.10) | 1.23 (0.79–1.92) | ||
PfAMA-1 titres | |||||
Lowest | 14% (43/313) | 1 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.02 |
Middle | 12% (73/608) | 0.86 (0.57–1.28) | 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | ||
Highest | 23% (69/306) | 1.83 (1.20–2.78) | 1.59 (1.03–2.45) |
Adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for socio-demographic factors (sex, household socio-economic status and location). PfMSP-1 (Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1), PfAMA-1 (Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen-1) CI (confidence interval). PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 antibody titres were analysed using separate regression models. KSHV seropositive is defined as seropositive to either ORF73 and/or K8.1.Bold values are statistically significant
We also analysed antibodies to ORF73 and K8.1 separately. Among mothers, the association between malaria antibodies and the presence of ORF73 seropositivity was stronger than the association between malaria antibodies and K8.1 seropositivity (Table 5). Findings among children were similar (Table 6), although mothers had a stronger association between malaria antibodies and KSHV seropositivity (compare Tables5 and 6).
Table 5.
ORF73 |
K8.1 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk factor | Prevalence of women with anti-ORF73 antibodies | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P* | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P* | Prevalence of women with anti-K8.1 antibodies | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P* |
PfMSP-1 titres | ||||||||||
Lowest | 53% (154/292) | 1 | <0.0001 | 1 | <0.0001 | 42% (122/292) | 1 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.01 |
Middle | 62% (359/581) | 1.45 (1.09–1.93) | 1.42 (1.04–1.93) | 45% (259/581) | 1.12 (0.84–1.49) | 1.21 (0.89–1.65) | ||||
Highest | 79% (231/291) | 3.45 (2.39–4.97) | 2.99 (2.01–4.45) | 54% (158/291) | 1.66 (1.19–2.30) | 1.57 (1.11–2.24) | ||||
PfAMA-1 titres | ||||||||||
Lowest | 45% (132/293) | 1 | <0.0001 | 1 | <0.0001 | 40% (118/293) | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.1 |
Middle | 69% (399/580) | 2.69 (2.01–3.59) | 2.47 (1.80–3.38) | 48% (277/580) | 1.36 (1.02–1.80) | 1.33 (0.97–1.80) | ||||
Highest | 73% (231/291) | 3.33 (2.35–4.71) | 3.05 (2.08–4.47) | 49% (144/291) | 1.45 (1.05–2.02) | 1.34 (0.94–1.91) |
Adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for hookworm infection, Mansonella perstans infection, socio-demographic factors (age group, household socio-economic status, location) and HIV status. PfMSP-1 (Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1), PfAMA-1 (Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen-1), CI (confidence interval), PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 antibody titres were analysed using separate regression models.Bold values are statistically significant
Table 6.
ORF73 |
K8.1 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk factor | Prevalence of children with anti-ORF73 antibodies | Crude odds ratios (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P* | Prevalence of children with K8.1 antibodies | Crude odds ratios (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P* |
PfMSP-1 titres | ||||||||||
Lowest | 6% (18/307) | 1 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.1 | 13% (939/307) | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.9 |
Middle | 8% (47/614) | 1.33 (0.76–2.33) | 1.28 (0.72–2.27) | 11% (66/614) | 0.83 (0.54–1.26) | 0.82 (0.53–1.25) | ||||
Highest | 10% (31/306) | 1.81 (1–3.31) | 1.61 (0.87–2.99) | 14% (43/306) | 1.12 (0.71–1.79) | 1 (0.62–1.61) | ||||
PfAMA-1 titres | ||||||||||
Lowest | 5% (16/313) | 1 | <0.0001 | 1 | <0.0001 | 12% (36/313) | 1 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.2 |
Middle | 5% (33/608) | 1.07 (0.58–1.97) | 1.01 (0.54–1.88) | 10% (61/608) | 0.86 (0.55–1.33) | 0.84 (0.54–1.31) | ||||
Highest | 15% (47/306) | 3.37 (1.86–6.08) | 2.76 (1.50–5.06) | 17% (51/306) | 1.54 (0.97–2.44) | 1.30 (0.81–2.09) |
Adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for socio-demographic factors (sex, household socio-economic status and location). PfMSP-1 (Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1), PfAMA-1 (Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen-1), CI (confidence interval), PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 antibody titres were analysed using separate regression models.Bold values are statistically significant
Treating antimalaria antibody titres as a continuous variable, among mothers, for every fourfold increase in malaria antibody titre, the odds of being KSHV seropositive increased by 67% (P < 0.0001) for PfMSP-1 antibody titres and 60% (P < 0.0001) for PfAMA-1 antibody titres. In the children, for every fourfold increase in PfAMA-1 antibody titres, the odds of being KSHV seropositive increased by 53% (P < 0.0001). PfMSP-1 antibody titres were not associated with KSHV seropositivity among children.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate malaria antibodies in relation to KSHV seropositivity. Its major findings are as follows: (1) KSHV seropositivity was strongly associated with malaria antibodies to both PfMSP-1 and PfAMA-1 in the mothers. (2) In the children, KSHV seropositivity was highly associated with malaria antibody titres to PfAMA-1 but not PfMSP-1. (3) In both mothers and their children, the association between malaria antibodies and KSHV antibodies was much stronger with ORF73 antibodies than K8.1 antibodies.
Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus seropositivity was strongly associated with both malaria antibodies in the mothers. In this study, we have used malaria antibodies as a proxy measure of malaria exposure. Continuous exposure to malaria infection leads to the development of an antibody response, some of which is associated with protective immunity to clinical disease [26–28]. The exact correlates of protection for malaria are unknown, although high malaria antibody titres to the malarial antigens used here (MSP-1 and AMA-1) have been associated with protection in some studies [26,29–31]and have, more recently, been used to demonstrate cumulative exposure with age to classify areas of different malaria endemicity [32,33]. Therefore, malaria antibody titres correlate with malaria infection exposure. Repeated exposure to malaria infection has been associated with detrimental effects on immune function [14,16] such as T- and B-cell exhaustion [13] and impairment of myeloid lineage cells such as dendritic cells function [15]. During KSHV latent infection, the immune system, through the action of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, prevents viral replication and hence keeps the virus in latency. The loss of T-cell immunity during repeated malaria infections could lead to loss of viral control and could consequently lead to KSHV transmission as a result of viral replication; (2) and/or render KSHV-negative individuals more susceptible to the infection, hence leading to KSHV acquisition.
The association between KSHV seropositivity and malaria antibodies could also be directly due to the effects of malaria parasite infection. We have previously shown that asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia is associated with KSHV seropositivity [7,8]. Possible mechanisms through which malaria infection could impact KSHV replication are (i) immunosuppression and (ii) polyclonal activation of KSHV latently infected B cells; malaria parasites cause both.
We found that, in both mothers and their children, the association between KSHV antibodies and malaria antibodies is much stronger with ORF73 antibodies than with K8.1 antibodies. ORF73 encodes LANA (latently associated nuclear antigen), which is expressed during latency to facilitate KSHV episomal replication, segregation of the KSHV genomes to daughter cells and viral oncogenicity [34]. K8.1, in contrast, is a structural protein expressed during lytic replication. There are a number of possible mechanisms that may explain this; however, there is considerable heterogeneity in the antibody response to more than 85 KSHV antigens [22]. Further studies are needed to understand the interaction of KSHV antigens with the immune system.
Unlike in the mothers, we observed that KSHV seropositivity is associated with antibodies to PfAMA-1 but not PfMSP-1 in the children. Possible explanations (either alone or in combination) could be that (i) the KSHV seroprevalence was very low in children (15%); this might have hindered detection of significant associations. (ii) The PfAMA-1 used is a larger molecule, will have more epitopes and therefore, is potentially a more sensitive biomarker for exposure [35]. Also, antibodies to PfMSP-1 take longer to develop, and hence their levels during early life are less well correlated with malaria exposure [29].
Our sample sizes were large enough to allow detection of statistically significant associations, at least in the mothers. Also, data on possible confounders were available; therefore, we were able to adjust for them. We were also able to detect specific antibody responses to more than one antigen per infection. Potential weaknesses were the lack of any information on the temporality, which could have effects on malaria infection distribution, and the cross-sectional study design, which did not allow us to ascertain when malaria antibody titres increased and when KSHV primary infection occurred.
Repeated exposure to malaria infection has detrimental effects on immune function, for example by leading to B- and T-cell exhaustion. We have shown that exposure to malaria infection, detected using malaria antibodies, is highly associated with KSHV seropositivity. Therefore, it is possible that malaria exposure is facilitating reactivation of KSHV, and perhaps also increasing the susceptibility to infection, which in turn may lead to increased transmission.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study participants for their cooperation and providing us with their samples to make this project possible. We would like to acknowledge the Co-Infection Studies Program team of MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, for their support in carrying out this project, and thank Prof. Jonathan Levin for his statistical support. We would like to acknowledge Ismail Sebina and Alison Rand for their support in carrying out KSHV serological assays and malaria serological assays respectively. This project was funded with federal funds from the National Institute of Health and the Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom.
References
- 1.Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, et al. A review of human carcinogens–Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:321–322. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chang Y, Moore PS. Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus and its role in KS. Infect Agents Dis. 1996;5:215–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dedicoat M, Newton R, Alkharsah KR, et al. Mother-to-child transmission of human herpesvirus-8 in South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1068–1075. doi: 10.1086/423326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Whitby D, Boshoff C. Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus as a new paradigm for virus-induced oncogenesis. Curr Opin Oncol. 1998;10:405–412. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199809000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dukers NH, Rezza G. Human herpesvirus 8 epidemiology: what we do and do not know. AIDS. 2003;17:1717–1730. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000076337.42412.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mesri EA, Cesarman E, Boshoff C. Kaposi's sarcoma and its associated herpesvirus. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:707–719. doi: 10.1038/nrc2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wakeham K, Webb EL, Sebina I, et al. Parasite infection is associated with Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) in Ugandan women. Infect Agent Cancer. 2011;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1750-9378-6-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wakeham K, Webb EL, Sebina I, et al. Risk factors for seropositivity to Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus among children in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:228–233. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828a7056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature. 1996;383:787–793. doi: 10.1038/383787a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elliott A, Yazdanbakhsh M. Troubles never come alone. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:211–213. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32835268ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hviid L, Theander TG, Abu-Zeid VA, et al. Loss of cellular immune reactivity during acute Plasmodium falciparum malaria. FEMS Microbiol Immunol. 1991;3:219–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rochford R, Cannon MJ, Moormann AM. Endemic Burkitt's lymphoma: a polymicrobial disease? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:182–187. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Illingworth J, Butler NS, Roetynck S, et al. Chronic exposure to Plasmodium falciparum is associated with phenotypic evidence of B and T cell exhaustion. J Immunol. 2013;190:1038–1047. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Toure-Balde A, Sarthou JL, Aribot G, et al. Plasmodium falciparum induces apoptosis in human mononuclear cells. Infect Immun. 1996;64:744–750. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.3.744-750.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Urban BC, Todryk S. Malaria pigment paralyzes dendritic cells. J Biol. 2006;5:4. doi: 10.1186/jbiol37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weiss GE, Traore B, Kayentao K, et al. The Plasmodium falciparum-specific human memory B cell compartment expands gradually with repeated malaria infections. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000912. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moormann AM, Chelimo K, Sumba PO, et al. Exposure to holoendemic malaria results in suppression of Epstein-Barr virus-specific T cell immunosurveillance in Kenyan children. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:799–808. doi: 10.1086/511984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moormann AM, Chelimo K, Sumba OP, et al. Exposure to holoendemic malaria results in elevated Epstein-Barr virus loads in children. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1233–1238. doi: 10.1086/428910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Elliott AM, Kizza M, Quigley MA, et al. The impact of helminths on the response to immunization and on the incidence of infection and disease in childhood in Uganda: design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial trial of deworming interventions delivered in pregnancy and early childhood [ISRCTN32849447] Clin Trials. 2007;4:42–57. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Webb EL, Mawa PA, Ndibazza J, et al. Effect of single-dose anthelmintic treatment during pregnancy on an infant's response to immunisation and on susceptibility to infectious diseases in infancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:52–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61457-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Sanjose S, Marshall V, Sola J, et al. Prevalence of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection in sex workers and women from the general population in Spain. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:155–158. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Labo N, Miley W, Marshall V, et al. Heterogeneity and breadth of host antibody response to KSHV infection demonstrated by systematic analysis of the KSHV proteome. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004046. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stewart L, Gosling R, Griffin J, et al. Rapid assessment of malaria transmission using age-specific sero-conversion rates. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bousema T, Youssef RM, Cook J, et al. Serologic markers for detecting malaria in areas of low endemicity, Somalia, 2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:392–399. doi: 10.3201/eid1603.090732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Royston P, Ambler G, Sauerbrei W. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:964–974. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.5.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Crompton PD, Pierce SK, Miller LH. Advances and challenges in malaria vaccine development. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:4168–4178. doi: 10.1172/JCI44423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cohen S, Mc GI, Carrington S. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature. 1961;192:733–737. doi: 10.1038/192733a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marsh K, Kinyanjui S. Immune effector mechanisms in malaria. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:51–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fowkes FJ, Richards JS, Simpson JA, Beeson JG. The relationship between anti-merozoite antibodies and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Holder AA, Guevara Patino JA, Uthaipibull C, et al. Merozoite surface protein 1, immune evasion, and vaccines against asexual blood stage malaria. Parassitologia. 1999;41:409–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Greenhouse B, Ho B, Hubbard A, et al. Antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum antigens predict a higher risk of malaria but protection from symptoms once parasitemic. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:19–26. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cook J, Kleinschmidt I, Schwabe C, et al. Serological markers suggest heterogeneity of effectiveness of malaria control interventions on Bioko Island, equatorial Guinea. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mosha JF, Sturrock HJ, Greenwood B, et al. Hot spot or not: a comparison of spatial statistical methods to predict prospective malaria infections. Malar J. 2014;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ye F, Lei X. Gao SJ. Mechanisms of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Latency and Reactivation. Adv Virol. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/193860. pii: 193860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahmed Ismail H, Ribacke U, Reiling L, et al. Acquired antibodies to merozoite antigens in children from Uganda with uncomplicated or severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:1170–1180. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00156-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]