Abstract
Recruitment of endogenous progenitors is critical during tissue repair. The inner ear utricle requires mechanosensory hair cells (HCs) to detect linear acceleration. After damage, non-mammalian utricles regenerate HCs via both proliferation and direct transdifferentiation. In adult mammals, limited transdifferentiation from unidentified progenitors occurs to regenerate extrastriolar Type II HCs. Here, we show that HC damage in neonatal mouse utricle activates the Wnt target gene Lgr5 in striolar supporting cells. Lineage tracing and time-lapse microscopy reveal that Lgr5+ cells transdifferentiate into HC-like cells in vitro. In contrast to adults, HC ablation in neonatal utricles in vivo recruits Lgr5+ cells to regenerate striolar HCs through mitotic and transdifferentiation pathways. Both Type I and II HCs are regenerated, and regenerated HCs display stereocilia and synapses. Lastly, stabilized β-catenin in Lgr5+ cells enhances mitotic activity and HC regeneration. Thus Lgr5 marks Wnt-regulated, damage-activated HC progenitors and may help uncover factors driving mammalian HC regeneration.
Keywords: facultative, sensory cells, development, canonical Wnt signaling
Introduction
Tissue injury activates endogenous stem/progenitor cells to regenerate lost cells, and disproportionate responses can result in disease states. The integumentary and intestinal systems are capable of self-renewing at baseline and after damage1–4, whereas the mature mammalian cochlea, which relies on sensory hair cells (HC) to detect auditory information, lacks the ability to regenerate new mechanoreceptive HCs. Within this spectrum of regenerative capacity is the mammalian utricle, a vestibular organ that requires HCs to detect linear acceleration and has a limited capacity to regenerate.
In birds, both the basilar papilla (cochlea) and utricle robustly regenerate lost HCs5–9. This regenerative process consists of: 1) renewed/upregulated supporting cell (SC) proliferation and subsequent differentiation into HCs; and 2) phenotypic conversion, a mechanism termed direct transdifferentiation. In this mechanism, a SC converts into a HC without undergoing a mitotic division. After damage, these two processes (mitotic and non-mitotic regeneration) occur in distinct spatiotemporal patterns10, 11.
The utricle consists of two types of HCs (Type I and II or HC-I and HC-II), which are distinguished by morphology, ion channel composition, expression of calcium-binding proteins, and synaptic innervation patterns12–14. HC-I’s reside predominantly in the J-shaped striolar region and HC-II’s in the extrastriolar region (Supplementary Fig. 1). During regeneration of the avian utricle, both HC-I’s and HC-II’s are robustly replenished to restore vestibular function7, 15. In contrast, the mammalian utricle regenerates only a small percentage of lost HCs in vitro and in vivo16–24, with little to no proliferation observed after HC loss16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25. Therefore, the primary mode of regeneration is assumed to be direct transdifferentiation. These replacement HCs appear to be exclusively of the Type II phenotype, and spontaneous regeneration of HC-I’s has not been reported in mammals23, 26. Finally, regeneration occurs mainly in the extrastriolar region with the extent of recovery reaching only 18% at 6–8 months after damage23, 26.
Within the sensory epithelium, HCs are interdigitated by SCs. Several lines of evidence suggest that SCs are the sources of regenerated HCs. First, cells isolated from the sensory epithelium can behave as HC progenitors27, 28. Second, a subset of SCs express the HC transcription factor Atoh1 after damage18, 23. Third, SCs are occasionally labeled with mitotic tracers after damage16, 19, 20, 25. However, a lineage marker of HC progenitors in the mammalian utricle has not been identified.
Wnt signaling plays essential roles in the regulation of tissue homeostasis by directing self-renewal of somatic stem cells29. Lgr5 is a Wnt target gene that marks somatic stem cells in self-regenerating organs1, 2 as well as progenitor cells recruited in the damaged liver and pancreas30, 31. In some tissues, injury upregulates Wnt signaling, which in turn promotes repair32, 33. However, overactive Wnt signaling also induces pathologic states by perturbing cellular differentiation and causing uncontrolled proliferation34, 35. Such conflicting effects have also been found in the developing cochlea, where in vivo activation of Wnt signaling in Lgr5+ SCs induces proliferation and a failure of differentiation into HCs36, 37. In contrast, the identical manipulation in Sox2+ SCs induces proliferation and limited ectopic HC formation37, 38. At present, the roles of Wnt-responsive cells after damage and whether Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes HC regeneration in the utricle are unknown.
Here, we report the emergence of Lgr5+ SCs in the striolar region of the utricle after HC loss in vitro and in vivo. In both models of HC loss, lineage tracing demonstrated that Lgr5+ SCs can act as HC precursors with both HC-Is and HC-IIs regenerated in vivo. Furthermore, β-catenin stabilization enhanced mitotic HC regeneration by Lgr5+ cells. Based on these data, we propose Lgr5+ SC’s as damage-recruited Wnt-regulated HC progenitors in the mammalian utricle.
Results
Damage activates Lgr5 expression in supporting cells in vitro
We examined utricles from neonatal Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+ mice1, which report active Wnt signaling and Lgr5 expression in the cochlea36, 39. In the cochlea, Lgr5-EGFP expression is regulated by Wnt signals, mirrors Lgr5 mRNA expression, and persists into early adulthood39, 40. In contrast, utricles from postnatal day 3 (P3) Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+ mice demonstrated no detectable EGFP signal (Fig. 1c, h) but had comparable HC densities and sensory epithelium dimensions to those of wildtype littermates (Supplementary Table 1). Because mechanical damage to the sensory epithelium led to robust upregulation of Lgr5-EGFP (Supplementary Fig. 1b), we examined whether HC damage induces Lgr5 expression using a well-characterized paradigm of aminoglycoside-induced HC death (1.0 mM neomycin × 24 hr, Fig. 1a)14, 16, 18. This paradigm resulted in HC death preferentially in the striolar region (Fig. 1b), which is defined by oncomodulin expression in undamaged tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1a)13.
Two days after neomycin treatment, many Lgr5-EGFP+ cells occupied the SC layer in the striolar region, whereas only a few were found in the extrastriolar region (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 1j, u). We measured the dimension and location of the oncomodulin+ striolar region before damage and of Lgr5-EGFP+ domains after neomycin damage and found no significant differences (Supplementary Table 2); we thus refer the Lgr5-EGFP+ domain as striolar. In situ hybridization showed Lgr5 mRNA expression in the striolar region 2 days after neomycin treatment but not in undamaged control tissues (Fig. 1f–g), thus corroborating spatiotemporal expression pattern of the Lgr5-EGFP reporter mice. Longitudinal analyses revealed that Lgr5+ cells first appeared after 4hr of neomycin treatment, subsequently increased in number and remained predominantly in the striolar region (Fig. 1p, Supplementary Fig. 1c–m). In the extrastriolar region where damage was less severe, rare Lgr5+ cells were transiently detected (Fig. 1p, Supplementary Fig. 1n–x). Twenty-four hours after damage, occasional Myo7a+ and Lgr5+ cells were stained by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL; Fig. 1m), indicating degenerating cells. While dying Myo7a+ and Lgr5+ cells significantly decreased 48 hr post damage (Fig. 1l–m), the number of Lgr5+ cells increased and reached a plateau between 48 and 72 hrs and remained robust for at least 6 days post damage (Fig. 1p, Supplementary Fig. 1c–m). At all timepoints examined, Lgr5+ cells resided in the SC layer (Fig. 1i–k). Jag1 and Sox2 are both expressed in SCs with the latter also marking Type II HCs. Immunostaining 48 hr after neomycin treatment showed that all Lgr5+ cells expressed Jag1 (n=4), but only a subset of them expressed Sox2 (26.9±38.2%, n=9, Fig. 1i–k). Lgr5+ cells occasionally expressed the HC markers Gfi1 (3.2±1.9%) and Myo7a (2.5±1.3%), but never the proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 1i–k, Supplementary Fig. 6a–c, Supplementary Table 6).
To validate and quantify Lgr5 expression after damage, we measured Lgr5 mRNA levels in utricles from P3 wildtype mice identically damaged by neomycin in vitro. In comparison to non-damaged, cultured controls, Lgr5 mRNA expression tripled in neomycin-treated cultures (p<0.01, Student’s t-test), whereas Pou4f3 decreased significantly (p<0.05, Student’s t-test) and Sox2 expression did not significantly change (Fig. 1e). The increase in Lgr5 transcripts in damaged wildtype organs is consistent with Lgr5 mRNA detected by in situ hybridization and also with the increased EGFP signal in damaged utricles from neonatal Lgr5-EGFP reporter mice.
Damage-activated Lgr5+ supporting cells generate HC-like cells in vitro
Prior studies on adult utricles have demonstrated regenerated HCs after aminoglycoside-induced HC loss in vitro; however, almost no proliferation has been observed16, 18, 20. Here we allowed neomycin-damaged neonatal utricles from P3 Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+ mice to recover in aminoglycoside-free media for 5 or 12 days and did not detect any significant increase in the number of Myo7a+ HCs (Fig. 2e). Addition of the thymidine analog EdU (1 μM × 5 days) failed to label Lgr5+ or Myo7a+ cells (Supplementary Table 6), indicating that Lgr5+ cells were not proliferative in vitro. We then used lineage tracing to determine whether damage-activated Lgr5+ cells can act as precursors for regenerated HCs observed in prior studies. After utricles from P3 Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice41 were damaged with neomycin, 4OH-tamoxifen (500 nM × 5 days) was added to aminoglycoside-free media to prospectively follow damage-induced Lgr5+ cells (Fig. 2a). In this model, tamoxifen-induced activation of Cre recombinase results in permanent labeling (tdTomato) of Lgr5+ cells and their progeny. Two days after neomycin-induced damage (48 hr of 4OH-tamoxifen), few tdTomato-positive, Lgr5 lineage-traced cells were observed, none of which expressed Myo7a (Supplementary Fig. 2a). By 5 days after neomycin-induced damage, few cells expressed tdTomato and Myo7a. One week later (12 days after damage), the number of tdTomato+/Myo7a+ cells increased 2.6-fold (p<0.05, Student’s t-test, 7.3±2.5 and 19.3±5.0 cells at 7DIV and 14DIV, respectively, Fig. 2c–d, g). These findings suggest that Lgr5+ SCs recruited after HC loss can contribute to the regeneration of HC-like cells in vitro. Addition of EdU (1 μM × 5 days) during the post-damage period did not label any tdTomato+/Myo7a+ cells (Supplementary Table 6), suggesting that Lgr5+ SCs acquired a HC fate directly without undergoing mitosis.
To further examine whether damage-recruited Lgr5+ cells undergo direct transdifferentiation, we performed time-lapse imaging concurrent with lineage tracing of damage-recruited Lgr5+ cells. As before, utricles from P3–5 Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice were first cultured and damaged with neomycin, then exposed to 4OH-tamoxifen to initiate labeling of Lgr5+ cells. Imaging began 2–4 days after damage and continued for 45–97 hr (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Fig. 2b). Utricular HCs and SCs are morphologically distinct with HCs being shorter, round-bottomed, and crowned apically with prominent stereocilia, while SCs are taller and narrower than HCs. Using these morphologic criteria, we analyzed time-lapse videos of 34 tdTomato+ cells (fate-mapped from the Lgr5+ lineage) from 4 utricles. We observed 2 tdTomato-labeled lineage-traced cells that appeared to convert into HC-like cells (Fig. 2i, Supplementary Fig. 2c–d, Supplementary Video 1–3). After fixation, we also detected Myo7a expression in a subset of tdTomato+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 2e). Together these data indicate that damage-activated Lgr5+ SCs can act as HC precursors in vitro.
Embryonic Lgr5+ cells contribute to damage-activated Lgr5+ cells
To determine the source of damage-activated Lgr5+ cells, we examined the embryonic utricle. Utricle development in mice begins around embryonic day 11.5 (E11.5) and extends into the first two postnatal weeks42–44. Prior to birth, 49% of HCs are present, and the sensory epithelium reaches 81% of its adult size42. Utricles from E15.5 Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+ mice showed robust Lgr5-EGFP expression in the central region of the sensory epithelium and the EGFP+ cells more commonly expressed Sox2 than Myo7a (84.1±24.7 and 15.2±5.5%, respectively, n=428 cells from 4 organs, Fig. 3a). Between E15.5 and P3, both Lgr5-EGFP+ cell counts and mRNA levels significantly decreased (p<0.01, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3a–f). At P3 and later ages, Lgr5-EGFP+ cells were undetectable (n=3, Fig. 3d–e).
To determine the relationship between embryonic Lgr5+ cells and those re-expressing Lgr5 in response to HC loss, we performed lineage tracing in Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice. When tamoxifen was administered at E15.5, and the utricles were viewed at E19.5, a small number of both HCs and SCs in the striolar region expressed tdTomato (4.6±1.4% Myo7a+ and 6.0±1.1% Sox2+ cells, n=1532–3184 cells from 3 organs). Next we harvested utricles at E19.5 and cultured them for 4 days (equivalent to P3) before damaging them with neomycin (Fig. 3g). In control undamaged organs, lineage-traced cells (tdTomato+) but no Lgr5-EGFP+ cells were detected (Fig. 3i). Neomycin-treated utricles contained Lgr5-EGFP+ cells in the striolar region at 7DIV, a subset of which (29.4±35.7%, n=479 cells from 8 utricles) were tdTomato+ (Fig. 3j–k), indicating that they derived from embryonic Lgr5+ cells.
In vivo hair cell ablation in Pou4f3DTR/+ mice
To investigate whether Lgr5+ cells can act as HC precursors after damage in vivo, we utilized Pou4f3-DTR mice23. In this mouse strain, the HC promoter Pou4f3 drives expression of the human diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR), thereby allowing selective HC ablation that can be temporally controlled by diphtheria toxin (DT) administration23, 45, 46. In P1 mice, a single DT injection (6.25 ng/g, IP) results in HC loss two days later (Fig. 4a). In contrast to the rapid HC loss centered in the striolar region caused by neomycin treatment in vitro, DT administration produced gradual HC loss encompassing the entire sensory epithelium. In comparison to age-matched control animals (wildtype littermates injected with DT), utricles from P3 Pou4f3DTR/+ mice showed comparable reductions in HC densities in the striolar and extrastriolar regions (Fig. 4b–k, Supplementary Fig. 3f, j, Supplementary Table 3). This degeneration was compounded by an overall decrease in the sensory epithelium (Myo7a+) area (Fig. 4j, Supplementary Table 3). Over the next 12 days, both the HC number and the total area of the sensory epithelium decreased and reached their lowest points between P7 and P15 (Fig. 4j–k, Supplementary Fig. 3n, Supplementary Table 3). The nadir of HC number of all time-points (P3–30) examined was P15, at which point the striolar and extrastriolar HC densities were 29.1±20.5 and 24.5±17.4% of age-matched controls, respectively (Fig. 4k, Supplementary Fig. 3n).
In comparison to P15, both the number of HCs and the area of the sensory epithelium area had significantly (but incompletely) recovered by P30 (Fig. 4j–k, Supplementary Fig. 3c–d, h–i, l–n, Supplementary Table 3). In undamaged utricles from P30 wildtype mice, 42.6±3.5% of striolar Myo7a+ HCs (n=2,121 cells from 12 organs, Fig. 4l, Supplementary Fig. 3e) expressed Sox2 and were classified as Type II23, 47. However, more HCs in damaged utricles from P30 Pou4f3DTR/+ expressed Sox2 (80.7±7.6%, p<0.0001, Student’s t-test, n=1,678 cells from 12 organs), suggesting that regenerated HCs were predominantly Type II. Our data using the Pou4f3DTR/+ mice indicate that the neonatal mouse utricle spontaneously regenerates HCs in vivo.
To investigate whether in vivo HC ablation also activates Lgr5 expression in SCs, we examined Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+, Pou4f3DTR/+ mice. After DT treatment at P1, Lgr5+ cells appeared 1 day later and increased in the subsequent 2 days (Fig. 4p, Supplementary Fig. 3o–q). At P4, Lgr5+ cells resided in the SC layer distributed in a striolar pattern and primarily expressed the SC marker Sox2 (Fig. 4n′). The dimensions and location of Lgr5-EGFP domain after DT-mediated damage in vivo was not different from that of oncomodulin+ striolar region in age-matched, undamaged control utricles. At P4, the Lgr5-EGFP domain surrounded the remaining oncomodulin+ striolar HCs (Fig. 4o). Lgr5+ cells were rare at P7 and undetectable at P15 (Fig. 4p, Supplementary Fig. 3r–s). Thus similar to our findings in the in vitro preparation, these data indicate that in vivo HC ablation similarly reactivates Lgr5 in striolar SCs and led us to next determine their cell fate via lineage tracing.
Damage-activated Lgr5+ supporting cells regenerate hair cell-like cells in vivo
While most damage-recruited Lgr5+ cells did not express Myo7a (97.5±1.1%, P4), a significant portion expressed the early hair cell marker Gfi1 (21.2±5.7%, Supplementary Fig. 6e, Supplementary Table 6). Most Lgr5+ cells that were Gfi1+/Myo7a- were found in the supporting cell layer (Supplementary Fig. 6e). To determine the significance of this, we fate-mapped Lgr5+ cells in Pou4f3DTR/+; Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice. After DT was injected at P1 to initiate HC degeneration, tamoxifen was administered at P3 to lineage-trace Lgr5+ cells (Fig. 5a). At P4, 18.9±4.7% of Sox2+ SCs expressed Lgr5 after damage (n=1,866 cells from 4 organs, Supplementary Fig. 3q). Two days after tamoxifen treatment, occasional tdTomato-expressing SCs and few Myo7a+ HCs were traced (Fig. 5c, f–g, Supplementary Table 4). In parallel controls (Pou4f3+/+; Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ identically administered with DT at P1 and tamoxifen at P3), no Lgr5-EGFP+ cells and only rare tdTomato+ cells were found (Fig. 5b, f–g, Supplementary Fig. 4b–c, Supplementary Table 4).
Because we had seen a partial recovery of HC number at P30 using this in vivo damage paradigm, we extended the tracing period to this age and found a significant increase in tdTomato+/ Myo7a+ cells in the striolar region (p<0.0001, Student’s t-test, Fig. 5d–f, Supplementary Table 4), suggesting that some Lgr5+ cells gave rise to Myo7a+ HCs. At P5, Myo7a+ cells were rarely tdTomato-positive (0.2±0.3%, n=850 cells from 5 organs), whereas 10.7±2.5% expressed tdTomato at P30 (n=3,523 cells from 28 organs), indicating that a significant proportion of newly generated HCs derived from Lgr5+ cells (Fig. 5g). Among all tdTomato+ cells, the proportion that was also Myo7a+ increased from 3.1±4.5% at P5 (n=53 cells from 5 organs) to 60.6±9.1% at P30 (p<0.0001, Student’s t-tests, n=635 cells from 28 organs, Fig. 5f, Supplementary Table 4), suggesting that many lineage-traced cells had converted to HCs in the striola. In undamaged control utricles, there was no significant increase in lineage-traced Myo7a+ cells at P30 (p=0.32, Student’s t-test; Fig. 5d, f, Supplementary Fig. 4e–f, Supplementary Table 4). We also performed lineage tracing using Pou4f3DTR/+; Plp1CreERT/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice and found a similar increase in lineage-traced Myo7a+ cells in the striolar region between P3 and P30 (Supplementary Fig. 4j–l, n, Supplementary Table 4). These data further indicate that Lgr5+ cells gave rise to new HCs after damage to the postnatal mouse utricle.
We next examined whether lineage-traced Myo7a+ cells possess apical features of utricle HCs, including the actin-rich stereocilia bundle and expression of the actin-bundling protein espin48. Using these markers, we detected three major morphologic patterns in regenerated HCs lineage-traced from the Lgr5+ lineage: long stereocilia (12.9±7.8%), short stereocilia (72.4±11.5%), or no stereocilia (14.7±10.4%)(n=69 HCs from 7 organs; Fig. 5i–j).
To relay sensory information centrally, HCs form synaptic connections with afferent projections from the vestibular ganglia. These synapses contain pre- and postsynaptic components comprised of Ctbp2 and Shank1, respectively49, 50. At P30, all Lgr5 lineage-traced Myo7a+ HCs expressed Ctbp2 and Shank1 on their basolateral surfaces (n=33–35 HCs from 3 organs; Fig. 5k–l). Immunostaining for Tuj1 also revealed neural elements juxtaposed to most lineage-traced Myo7a+ HCs (92.8±6.7%; n=37 HCs from 3 organs, Fig. 5m), suggesting that regenerated HCs are neurally integrated.
Utricular HCs are subdivided into Type I and II with the former expressing calbindin and encased by afferent calyces on their basolateral surface; HC-IIs lack these elements yet express Sox212, 14, 51. As a marker of HC-Is, calbindin was expressed in 48.4±6.5% of Myo7a+ HCs traced from the Lgr5+ lineage (n=47 cells from 3 organs, Fig. 5n, p), and 45.6±5.1% of lineage-traced HCs exhibited Tuj1+ calyx-like innervation (n=37 cells from 3 organs, Fig. 5m, p). Conversely, 53.7±3.2% lineage-traced HCs were immuno-positive for Sox2 (n=28 cells from 3 organs, Fig. 5o–p). In sum, these results show that damage-recruited Lgr5+ cells can give rise to bundle-bearing, neurally connected HCs of both Type I and II.
Distinct supporting cell populations contribute to hair cell regeneration
We observed an increase in HC number in both the striolar and extrastriolar regions in the utricles of DT-treated Pou4f3-DTR mice at P30. However, Lgr5+ SCs almost exclusively contributed to regeneration of striolar HCs. Therefore, we hypothesized that Lgr5-negative SCs may act as HC precursors in the extrastriolar domain. Since prior studies have shown that tamoxifen preferentially activates Cre recombinase in extrastriolar SCs in Plp1-CreERT mice42, 52, we employed Plp1CreERT/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice to test this hypothesis. Tamoxifen (0.75 mg/g gavage) administration at P1 induced tdTomato labeling of Sox2+, Myo7a-negative SCs in the striolar and extrastriolar regions two days later (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Fig. 4i). Using Pou4f3+/+; Plp1CreERT/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ littermates as undamaged controls, we examined whether Plp1-Cre+ SCs also contribute to extrastriolar HC regeneration using Pou4f3DTR/+; Plp1CreERT/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice. After tamoxifen administration at P1, DT treatment (8 hr later) similarly led to HC loss and sensory epithelium shrinkage at P7 and subsequent HC regeneration at P30 (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 4j–l). In comparison to undamaged controls, significantly more Myo7a+ HCs were tdTomato+ in the extrastriolar region at P30 (81.1±1.8% and 22.7±4.3%, respectively, p<0.0001, Student’s t-test, Fig. 6b–g, Supplementary Table 4). These data show that Plp1+ SCs contribute to HC regeneration in the extrastriolar region after in vivo HC ablation.
To determine if Lgr5+ cells are more likely to regenerate HCs than Plp1+ cells in the striolar region, we analyzed utricles from P30 transgenic mice used to trace both lineages. Despite the reported low Cre activity in the striola of Plp1-CreERT mice42, we observed many Plp1 lineage-traced SCs using the Rosa26R-tdTomato Cre reporter mice (Supplementary Fig. 4i). Because our tracing schemes led to significantly more tdTomato+ cells in the Plp1+ than in Lgr5+ lineages, we measured regenerative capacity as the percentage of tdTomato+ lineage-traced cells that were Myo7a+. In the striolar region where Lgr5 expression was robust (Fig. 4n), significantly more tdTomato+ cells of the Lgr5+ lineage than those of the Plp1+ lineage expressed Myo7a at P30 (60.6±9.1% vs. 25.7±2.7%, p<0.0001, Student’s t-test, Fig. 6h, Supplementary Table 4). In contrast, the extrastriolar region lacked Lgr5-expression and harbored traced Myo7a+ cells from the Plp1+ lineage and not the Lgr5+ lineage (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 4g). These results suggest a spatial segregation of HC progenitors in which a higher proportion of Lgr5+ SCs, compared to Plp1+ SCs, converted to HCs in the striola.
Lgr5+ supporting cells proliferate and differentiate into hair cells
We next asked whether Lgr5+ SCs are more proliferative than Lgr5-negative SCs in response to HC loss. Prior studies demonstrated some proliferative regeneration of HCs in the neonatal mouse utricle16. We first marked proliferative cells by administering the mitotic marker EdU (50 mg/kg once daily at P4–6) after DT-mediated HC ablation in P1 Pou4f3DTR/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 5a). At P7 and P30, sensory epithelium in damaged organs had robust EdU labeling, which was rare in undamaged, age-matched controls (wildtype littermates identically injected with DT and EdU, Supplementary Fig. 5b–e). In undamaged controls, most EdU-labeled cells resided in the stromal layer below the sensory epithelium (Supplementary Fig. 5b, d). In damaged organs, significantly more EdU+/Sox2+ SCs resided in the striolar than extrastriolar regions at P7 and P30 (p<0.0001, Student’s t-tests, for both, Fig. 6n, Supplementary Fig. 5c, e). Similarly, the striolar region contained more EdU+/Myo7a+ HCs than the extrastriolar region at P7 and P30 (Supplementary Fig 5c, e). Thus, the Lgr5-containing striolar region is significantly more proliferative than the extrastriolar region. To determine the identity of these proliferative cells, we immunostained utricles from P4 Pou4f3DTR/+; Lgr5EGFP-Cre-ERT2/+ mice and found that 8.1±3.5% Lgr5+ cells expressed the proliferative marker Ki67 (Supplementary Fig. 6f and Supplementary Table 6).
Next we investigated the fate of these damage-activated proliferative cells by combining lineage and mitotic tracing in Pou4f3DTR/+; Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice (DT at P1, tamoxifen at P3, EdU at P4–6 with Pou4f3DTR/+ mice as controls (Fig. 6i). EdU labeled a significantly higher percentage of SCs of the Lgr5 lineage (tdTomato+) than of Sox2+ SCs in the striolar and extrastriolar regions at P7 and P30 (Fig. 6k, m–n, Supplementary Fig. 5c, e). At P7, 5.9±2.6% of Myo7a+ HCs were tdTomato-labeled, but no EdU+/tdTomato+/Myo7a+ HCs were observed (n=602 cells from 6 organs, Fig. 6k). At P30, 22.8±9.8% of tdTomato+/Myo7a+ HCs were EdU-labeled (n=60 cells from 6 organs, Fig. 6m–n). These results indicate that Lgr5+ cells represent spatially specified HC progenitors that are capable of mitotic HC regeneration in vivo.
β-catenin stabilization promotes proliferation of damage-activated Lgr5+ supporting cells in vivo
As the central mediator of canonical Wnt signaling, β-catenin overexpression has been shown to exert contrasting effects on SCs in the developing cochlea36, 37. We examined the roles of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on damaged-recruited Lgr5+ cells by generating the Pou4f3DTR/+; Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Catnbflox(exon3)/+ mice53. In this set of experiments, DT was administered at P1 to ablate HCs, tamoxifen (0.075 mg/g) was given at P3 to activate Cre recombinase in Lgr5+ cells and EdU (25 mg/kg daily at P4–6) was used to label proliferating cells. Utricles were examined at P30 (Fig. 7a). In comparison to DT-damaged utricles without stabilized β-catenin, damaged organs with stabilized β-catenin contained larger sensory epithelia (46.2±15.6 and 64.7±4.9% of undamaged controls, respectively, Fig. 7d–f). In the striolar region where most EdU+ HCs and SCs resided, β-catenin stabilization caused a modest but significant increase in HCs (p<0.005, Student’s t-test, Fig. 7d′–e′, g) but not SCs. In addition, activating Wnt signaling in Lgr5+ cells significantly increased both the numbers of EdU+/Myo7a+ cells and EdU+ SCs in the striola (Fig. 7d′–e″) while those in the extrastriola were comparable to DT-damaged organs (Supplementary Table 5). Without DT-mediated damage, tamoxifen did not increase EdU uptake in Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Catnbflox(exon3)/+ utricles (Fig. 7b–c, h–i), suggesting that Lgr5 was not expressed and Cre recombinase activity was absent. Together, these results implicate that β-catenin stabilization stimulates proliferation and mitotic HC regeneration by damage-activated Lgr5+ SCs.
Discussion
Hearing and balance functions require mechanosensory HCs, and diseases that cause HC degeneration manifest as hearing or balance disorders. In the mature mammalian cochlea, the absence of HC regeneration underlies the permanence of hearing loss54, 55. The mammalian vestibular epithelium, however, exhibits a limited regenerative capacity and therefore serves as a useful preparation in which to examine mammalian HC regeneration. Here, we have identified Lgr5+ cells as region-specific HC progenitors capable of both mitotic and non-mitotic HC regeneration at early postnatal stages. Moreover, we show that Wnt/β-catenin signaling can modestly enhance mitotic regeneration by Lgr5+ cells in the damaged neonatal utricle.
While utricular HCs are functional in the neonatal period56, 57, prior studies comparing neonatal to adult utricles found differences in cellular composition12, 42, responsiveness to Notch inhibition18, 58, and proliferative responses to damage16, 23. Specifically, the neonatal utricle can proliferate and mitotically regenerate HCs, whereas the primary mode of HC regeneration in the adult organ is direct transdifferentiation. Because both modes of HC regeneration operate in non-mammalian vertebrates to restore auditory and vestibular functions, they are likely important in restoring the proper cytoarchitecture and functions of HCs and SCs7, 59. Our data indicate that Lgr5+ cells in the neonatal utricle are capable of regenerating HCs via both direct transdifferentiation and mitotic regeneration. Moreover, in the adult utricle, HC regeneration is mainly in the extrastriolar region in which regenerated HCs are primarily Type II17, 23. While both HC-Is and HC-IIs function as mechanoreceptors, the former are concentrated in the striolar region, and they are morphologically and functionally distinct from HC-IIs12. Our study shows that Lgr5+ cells in the neonatal utricle can regenerate both HC-Is and HC-IIs, behavior that is reminiscent of SCs from avian utricles in which both types of HCs are spontaneously regenerated7. Therefore, future studies defining the molecular signatures of Lgr5+ cells may help reveal factors regulating the regeneration of distinct HC subtypes and also those dictating the two modes of HC regeneration. As HCs are still being born with committed HCs maturing, SCs in the neonatal utricle may be less mature and more plastic than those in the adult organ, possibly accounting for their differential responses to damage. In addition, it is important to note that while Lgr5 expression was induced by damage both in vitro and in vivo, behavior of Lgr5+ cells in the two systems differ in that direct transdifferentiation predominated and mitotic regeneration was absent in vitro, and the degree of HC regeneration was much less robust than that observed in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplemental Table 6).
After neomycin damage in vitro (14DIV), 19.3±5.0 striolar hair cells per organ were fate-mapped from the Lgr5 lineage. One month after hair cell ablation in vivo, 38.7±6.2 Lgr5 lineage-traced hair cells were noted in the striola of each organ. We postulate that the different damage models used (neomycin in vitro versus diphtheria toxin in vivo) may have, at least in part, caused these differences by inflicting more damage in vitro as degenerating Lgr5+ SCs (which appeared smaller, TUNEL-positive, and Sox2-negative) were more frequently observed in vitro than in vivo. As a result, the persistence of Lgr5 expression observed in vitro and (not in vivo) may reflect an undifferentiated state1, 30, in which damaged-recruited Lgr5+ cells lack additional cues that are required for them to proliferate and/or differentiate. To add to this complexity, the culture system may also lack secreted mitogenic/prosensory factors normally present in vivo, with candidates including TGFα, EGF and possibly other family members60, 61. Thus future studies comparing the in vitro and in vivo systems may shed light on factors limiting or driving spontaneous HC regeneration in mammals.
Canonical Wnt signaling becomes activated after damage and mediates repair in multiple organ systems4, 30, 32. In the current study, embryonic Lgr5+ cells contributed to otherwise quiescent resident cells that became recruited in response to tissue injury. Similarly in the mammary gland, Wnt-responsive cells contribute to organ development as well as to the resident progenitor cells that are recruited for glandular outgrowth during pregnancy62. In less regenerative organs such as the liver and pancreas, tissue damage similarly elicits the emergence of Lgr5+ progenitors cells, which can be expanded in vitro in a Wnt-dependent manner to form organoids consisting of mature cell types30, 31.
Overactive Wnt signaling can also induce pathologic states as a result of uncontrolled proliferation and a lack of cellular differentiation34, 35. In the developing cochlea, conflicting results have been observed as a result of β-catenin stabilization36, 37. Our data indicate that β-catenin stabilization resulted in a modest increase in HC density and more remarkably the number of EdU-labeled HCs and SCs, suggesting that canonical Wnt signaling primarily serves as a proliferative signal to Lgr5+ cells but does not limit their HC fate (Fig. 8). These results lead us to propose that other instructive signals, possibly including increased Atoh1 expression and decreased Notch signaling18, 63–67, can be complementary for driving HC regeneration. While active Wnt signaling may be used to increase the population of competent cells, more work is necessary to test the feasibility and success of such combinatorial approaches.
In summary, we report that HC loss results in induction of Lgr5 in a subset of striolar SCs, which can behave as facultative HC progenitors in the neonatal utricle in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, Lgr5+ cells may be useful for further dissecting the mechanisms governing mammalian HC regeneration.
Experimental Methods
Mice
Lgr5-EGFP-CreERT2 (Jackson Laboratory, #8875)1, Plp1-CreERT (Jackson Laboratory, #5975)68, Rosa26R-tdTomato (Jackson Laboratory, #7908)41, Pou4f3-DTR23, and Catnb-flox(exon3)53 mice of both genders were used. For Cre activation, tamoxifen (dissolved in corn oil; Sigma) was given via gavage to neonatal mice (0.075 mg/g for Lgr5-EGFP-CreERT2 and 0.75 mg/g Plp1-CreERT strains) and dams (0.225 mg/g, IP). Diphtheria toxin (6.25 ng/g IP, List Biological Laboratories) and EdU (25–50 mg/kg IP, Invitrogen) were used. All protocols were approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of the Stanford University School of Medicine, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, and NIH.
Cell quantification and statistics
Cells were quantified from z-stack images of 20,000 μm2 using Volocity software (v6.1.0; Improvision) unless otherwise stated. Images were taken from 1–2 representative areas from the striolar (each area is ~20,000 μm2 and represent 35%–48% of the striola, which we defined as oncomodulin+, Lgr5+, or Lgr5-lineage-traced domains, see Fig. 4f′, Supplementary Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 2 for details) or extrastriolar regions for analyses. In damaged tissues where oncomodulin-marked HC-I had degenerated, Lgr5 or Lgr5-lineage-traced expression was used to define the striolar region. For all experiments, n values represent the number of cells or organs examined unless otherwise stated. Statistical analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad). Two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. p<0.05 was considered as significant. Data shown as mean±S.D.
Whole organ cultures
Utricles were harvested from E19.5-P5 mice of both genders and otoconia removed in sterile conditions, and then attached to coverslips (10 mm, Marienfeld) pre-coated with CellTaK (BD Biosciences) and placed in 4-well Petri dishes (CellStar). Whole organs were cultured in growth factor-enriched, serum-free media, consisting of DMEM/F12 (1:1; Cellgro), N2 (1:100), B27 (1:50, both from Invitrogen), bFGF (1 ng/ml), IGF-1 (50 ng/ml), EGF (20 ng/ml), heparin sulfate (50 ng/ml), and ampicillin (50 ng/ml; all from Sigma). The following agents were added to a subset of cultures: neomycin (1.0 mM, Sigma), EdU (1.0 μM; Invitrogen), 4OH-tamoxifen (500 nM, Sigma).
Genotyping and Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)
Standard PCR was performed to genotype transgenic mice using genomic DNA. DNA was isolated by adding 200 μl of 50 mM NaOH to cut tail tips, incubating at 98°C for 1 hour, and then adding 20 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl.
For qPCR, total RNA was isolated with RNeasy mini extraction kits (Qiagen), then cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System kits (Invitrogen). SYBR Green PCR Mix kit (Applied Biosystems) was used to perform qPCR reactions on a 7900HT-Fast Real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). All qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate and relative quantification of gene expression was analyzed using the ΔΔCT method with GAPDH as the endogenous reference69. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 7.
Immunohistochemistry70
Utricles were fixed for 1 hr in 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS, pH 7.4; Electron Microscopy Services) at room temperature. Tissues were blocked with 5% goat or donkey serum, 0.1% tritonX-100, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.02% sodium azide (NaN3) in PBS at pH 7.4 for 1–2 hr at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibodies diluted in the same blocking solution overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber. The next day, after washing with PBS, tissues were incubated with secondary antibodies diluted in 0.1% tritonX-100, 0.1% BSA, and 0.02% NaN3 solution in PBS for 1hr at room temperature. After PBS washing, tissues were then mounted in antifade Fluorescence Mounting Medium (DAKO) and coverslipped. We used antibodies against the following markers: Myosin7a (1:1000; Proteus Bioscience or Labome), Tuj1 (1:1000; Neuromics), Ki67 (1:1000; Abcam), Gfi1 (1:1000; gift from H. Bellen), Calbindin (1:1000; Millipore), Espin (1:1000, gift from S. Heller), Ctbp2 (1:100; BD Transduction Laboratories), Shank1 (1:100; Neuromics), Sox2 (1:400), Jag1 (1:200), and Oncomodulin (1:250, all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The secondary antibodies were conjugated with FITC, TRITC, or Cy5 (1:500, Invitrogen). Fluorescent-conjugated phalloidin (1:1000; Sigma), DAPI (1:10000; Invitrogen), and Alexa Fluor 488, 555 or 647 EdU detection kit (Invitrogen) were used. TUNEL Alexa Fluor 594 imaging Assay kit (Invitrogen) was used in accordance to kit instructions. Images were acquired using epifluorescent or confocal microscopy (Axioplan 2, Zeiss Pascal or LSM700) and analyzed with Image J64 (NIH) and Photoshop CS4 (Adobe Systems). Three-dimensional reconstruction of Z-stack images was performed with Volocity software (v6.1.0; Improvision).
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed on cultured P3 wildtype utricles using RNAscope® probes for Lgr5 according to manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Probes for DapB were used as negative controls. Utricles were fixed for 1.5 hrs in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed in PBS before hybridized with probes for 2 hr at 40°C. Signal was amplified and detected with 2.0 HD reagent Kit-RED and imaged on the EVOS® XL Core Imaging system (Life Technologies).
Time-lapse imaging
Utricles harvested from P3-P5 Lgr5EGFP-CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ mice were attached to 35 mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek) pre-coated with CellTaK (BD Biosciences). Whole organs were cultured overnight, then treated with neomycin (1.0 mM × 24hr, Sigma) as above. 4OH-tamoxifen (500 nM, Sigma) in growth factor-enriched, serum-free media was present for 2–4 days first. Then organs were imaged in DMEF/F12 without phenol red (1:1 Cellgro) media using a spinning disc confocal imaging system (Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 or OlympusIX-81 coupled with a Yokogawa spinning disc system CSU-X1A 5000) connected to an incubating chamber (37°C, 5% CO2). One to two EGFP+ regions with tdTomato+ cells were selected from each utricle, and z-stack images spanning the sensory epithelium were taken at 0.5–1 hr intervals. Collected videos were processed and analyzed with ImageJ64 (NIH), MetaMorph (NX 2.0; Olympus) and Volocity software (v6.1.0; Improvision).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank E. Rubel, D. Wu, S. Heller, M. Drummond, B. Cox for critical reading, R. Nusse, O. Bermingham-McDonogh, J. Corwin, E. Oesterle, J. Stone, A. Ricci, and our laboratory members for fruitful discussions, V. Nookala, J. Luo, G. Huang, M. Drummond, L. Tong and Z. Sayyid for excellent technical assistance, M. Taketo for sharing the Catnb-flox(exon3) mouse, E. Rubel for sharing the Pou4f3-DTR mouse, H. Bellen for sharing antibodies, and E. Monzack for figure illustration (5h). This work was supported by NIH-NCATS-CTSA (UL1 TR001085), Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health, Child Health Research Institute, National Basic Research Program of China 2012CB967904, 2012CB967900 (T.W.), National Basic Research Program of China 2015CB965000, National Natural Science Foundation of China 81470692, Natural Science Foundation from Jiangsu Province BK20140620 (R.C.), Stanford University Medical Scholars Program, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Scholars Fellowship (G.S.K.), Swedish Research Council C0657401 (L.J.), R01DC006471, P30CA21765, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Office of Naval Research (J.Z.), NIDCD Division of Intramural Research 1ZIADC000079 (L.L.C.), NIDCD/NIH P30DC010363, K08DC011043, RO1DC013910, Department of Defense MR130316, and Akiko Yamazaki and Jerry Yang Faculty Scholar Fund, American Hearing Research Foundation, and California Initiative in Regenerative Medicine RN3-06529 (A.G.C.).
Footnotes
Author contributions
T.W., R.C. G.S.K., N.P., L.J., D.-H.N. B.K., L.M., L.L.C., A.G.C. designed and performed experiments and analyzed data, T.W., R.C., G.S.K., N.P., J.Z., L.L.C., A.G.C. wrote the manuscript.
Competing Financial Interest Statement
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- 1.Barker N, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–1007. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jaks V, et al. Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1291–1299. doi: 10.1038/ng.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tumbar T, et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science. 2004;303:359–363. doi: 10.1126/science.1092436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lim X, et al. Interfollicular epidermal stem cells self-renew via autocrine Wnt signaling. Science. 2013;342:1226–1230. doi: 10.1126/science.1239730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Corwin JT, Cotanche DA. Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma. Science. 1988;240:1772–1774. doi: 10.1126/science.3381100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryals BM, Rubel EW. Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult Coturnix quail. Science. 1988;240:1774–1776. doi: 10.1126/science.3381101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weisleder P, Rubel EW. Hair cell regeneration after streptomycin toxicity in the avian vestibular epithelium. J Comp Neurol. 1993;331:97–110. doi: 10.1002/cne.903310106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roberson DF, Weisleder P, Bohrer PS, Rubel EW. Ongoing production of sensory cells in the vestibular epithelium of the chick. Hear Res. 1992;57:166–174. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90149-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jorgensen JM, Mathiesen C. The avian inner ear. Continuous production of hair cells in vestibular sensory organs, but not in the auditory papilla. Naturwissenschaften. 1988;75:319–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00367330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stone JS, Cotanche DA. Hair cell regeneration in the avian auditory epithelium. The International journal of developmental biology. 2007;51:633–647. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072408js. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roberson DW, Alosi JA, Cotanche DA. Direct transdifferentiation gives rise to the earliest new hair cells in regenerating avian auditory epithelium. J Neurosci Res. 2004;78:461–471. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rusch A, Lysakowski A, Eatock RA. Postnatal development of type I and type II hair cells in the mouse utricle: acquisition of voltage-gated conductances and differentiated morphology. J Neurosci. 1998;18:7487–7501. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07487.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simmons DD, Tong B, Schrader AD, Hornak AJ. Oncomodulin identifies different hair cell types in the mammalian inner ear. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:3785–3802. doi: 10.1002/cne.22424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cunningham LL, Cheng AG, Rubel EW. Caspase activation in hair cells of the mouse utricle exposed to neomycin. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2002;22:8532–8540. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08532.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dye BJ, Frank TC, Newlands SD, Dickman JD. Distribution and time course of hair cell regeneration in the pigeon utricle. Hear Res. 1999;133:17–26. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00046-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burns JC, Cox BC, Thiede BR, Zuo J, Corwin JT. In vivo proliferative regeneration of balance hair cells in newborn mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32:6570–6577. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6274-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Forge A, Li L, Corwin JT, Nevill G. Ultrastructural evidence for hair cell regeneration in the mammalian inner ear. Science. 1993;259:1616–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.8456284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lin V, et al. Inhibition of Notch activity promotes nonmitotic regeneration of hair cells in the adult mouse utricles. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15329–15339. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2057-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rubel EW, Dew LA, Roberson DW. Mammalian vestibular hair cell regeneration. Science. 1995;267:701–707. doi: 10.1126/science.7839150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Warchol ME, Lambert PR, Goldstein BJ, Forge A, Corwin JT. Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adult guinea pigs and humans. Science. 1993;259:1619–1622. doi: 10.1126/science.8456285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oesterle EC, Cunningham DE, Westrum LE, Rubel EW. Ultrastructural analysis of [3H]thymidine-labeled cells in the rat utricular macula. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2003;463:177–195. doi: 10.1002/cne.10756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kawamoto K, Izumikawa M, Beyer LA, Atkin GM, Raphael Y. Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the mouse utricle following gentamicin ototoxicity. Hear Res. 2009;247:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Golub JS, et al. Hair cell replacement in adult mouse utricles after targeted ablation of hair cells with diphtheria toxin. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32:15093–15105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1709-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lambert PR, Gu R, Corwin JT. Analysis of small hair bundles in the utricles of mature guinea pigs. Am J Otol. 1997;18:637–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li L, Forge A. Morphological evidence for supporting cell to hair cell conversion in the mammalian utricular macula. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1997;15:433–446. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(96)00102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Forge A, Li L, Nevill G. Hair cell recovery in the vestibular sensory epithelia of mature guinea pigs. J Comp Neurol. 1998;397:69–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li H, Liu H, Heller S. Pluripotent stem cells from the adult mouse inner ear. Nat Med. 2003;9:1293–1299. doi: 10.1038/nm925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oshima K, et al. Differential distribution of stem cells in the auditory and vestibular organs of the inner ear. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO. 2007;8:18–31. doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0058-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781–810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huch M, et al. In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration. Nature. 2013;494:247–250. doi: 10.1038/nature11826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huch M, et al. Unlimited in vitro expansion of adult bi-potent pancreas progenitors through the Lgr5/R-spondin axis. The EMBO journal. 2013;32:2708–2721. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Minear S, et al. Wnt proteins promote bone regeneration. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:29ra30. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miyoshi H, Ajima R, Luo CT, Yamaguchi TP, Stappenbeck TS. Wnt5a potentiates TGF-beta signaling to promote colonic crypt regeneration after tissue injury. Science. 2012;338:108–113. doi: 10.1126/science.1223821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barker N, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fancy SP, et al. Parallel states of pathological Wnt signaling in neonatal brain injury and colon cancer. Nature neuroscience. 2014;17:506–512. doi: 10.1038/nn.3676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chai R, et al. Wnt signaling induces proliferation of sensory precursors in the postnatal mouse cochlea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:8167–8172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202774109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shi F, Hu L, Edge AS. Generation of hair cells in neonatal mice by beta-catenin overexpression in Lgr5-positive cochlear progenitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:13851–13856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219952110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jacques BE, et al. A dual function for canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the developing mammalian cochlea. Development. 2012;139:4395–4404. doi: 10.1242/dev.080358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chai R, et al. Dynamic expression of Lgr5, a Wnt target gene, in the developing and mature mouse cochlea. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO. 2011;12:455–469. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0267-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shi F, Kempfle JS, Edge AS. Wnt-responsive Lgr5-expressing stem cells are hair cell progenitors in the cochlea. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32:9639–9648. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1064-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Madisen L, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Burns JC, On D, Baker W, Collado MS, Corwin JT. Over half the hair cells in the mouse utricle first appear after birth, with significant numbers originating from early postnatal mitotic production in peripheral and striolar growth zones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012;13:609–627. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0337-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Takumida M, Harada Y. Development of the utricular macula in the mouse. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;241:9–15. doi: 10.1007/BF00457911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ruben RJ. Development of the inner ear of the mouse: a radioautographic study of terminal mitoses. Acta Otolaryngol. 1967;(Suppl 220):221–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mahrt EJ, Perkel DJ, Tong L, Rubel EW, Portfors CV. Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations do not require auditory experience. J Neurosci. 2013;33:5573–5583. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5054-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cox BC, et al. Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo. Development. 2014;141:816–829. doi: 10.1242/dev.103036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hume CR, Bratt DL, Oesterle EC. Expression of LHX3 and SOX2 during mouse inner ear development. Gene expression patterns: GEP. 2007;7:798–807. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zheng L, et al. The deaf jerker mouse has a mutation in the gene encoding the espin actin-bundling proteins of hair cell stereocilia and lacks espins. Cell. 2000;102:377–385. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00042-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huang LC, et al. Synaptic profiles during neurite extension, refinement and retraction in the developing cochlea. Neural Dev. 2012;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-7-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zenisek D, Davila V, Wan L, Almers W. Imaging calcium entry sites and ribbon structures in two presynaptic cells. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2538–2548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02538.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Oesterle EC, Campbell S, Taylor RR, Forge A, Hume CR. Sox2 and JAGGED1 expression in normal and drug-damaged adult mouse inner ear. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO. 2008;9:65–89. doi: 10.1007/s10162-007-0106-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gomez-Casati ME, Murtie J, Taylor B, Corfas G. Cell-specific inducible gene recombination in postnatal inner ear supporting cells and glia. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO. 2010;11:19–26. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0191-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Harada N, et al. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. The EMBO journal. 1999;18:5931–5942. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bermingham-McDonogh O, Rubel EW. Hair cell regeneration: winging our way towards a sound future. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:119–126. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Brigande JV, Heller S. Quo vadis, hair cell regeneration? Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:679–685. doi: 10.1038/nn.2311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Freeman S, Plotnik M, Elidan J, Sohmer H. Development of short latency vestibular evoked potentials in the neonatal rat. Hear Res. 1999;137:51–58. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Geleoc GS, Risner JR, Holt JR. Developmental acquisition of voltage-dependent conductances and sensory signaling in hair cells of the embryonic mouse inner ear. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2004;24:11148–11159. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2662-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Collado MS, Burns JC, Hu Z, Corwin JT. Recent advances in hair cell regeneration research. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2008;16:465–471. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32830f4ab5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Duckert LG, Rubel EW. Morphological correlates of functional recovery in the chicken inner ear after gentamycin treatment. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1993;331:75–96. doi: 10.1002/cne.903310105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yamashita H, Oesterle EC. Induction of cell proliferation in mammalian inner-ear sensory epithelia by transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:3152–3155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tsue TT, Oesterle EC, Rubel EW. Diffusible factors regulate hair cell regeneration in the avian inner ear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:1584–1588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.van Amerongen R, Bowman AN, Nusse R. Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/beta-catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. Cell stem cell. 2012;11:387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mizutari K, et al. Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma. Neuron. 2013;77:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zheng JL, Gao WQ. Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nature neuroscience. 2000;3:580–586. doi: 10.1038/75753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Staecker H, Praetorius M, Baker K, Brough DE. Vestibular hair cell regeneration and restoration of balance function induced by math1 gene transfer. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:223–231. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kawamoto K, Ishimoto S, Minoda R, Brough DE, Raphael Y. Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2003;23:4395–4400. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04395.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Izumikawa M, et al. Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nature medicine. 2005;11:271–276. doi: 10.1038/nm1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Doerflinger NH, Macklin WB, Popko B. Inducible site-specific recombination in myelinating cells. Genesis. 2003;35:63–72. doi: 10.1002/gene.10154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jan TA, et al. Tympanic border cells are Wnt-responsive and can act as progenitors for postnatal mouse cochlear cells. Development. 2013;140:1196–1206. doi: 10.1242/dev.087528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.