Significance
We present data supporting the presence of an indigenous source of fixed nitrogen on the surface of Mars in the form of nitrate. This fixed nitrogen may indicate the first stage in development of a primitive nitrogen cycle on the surface of ancient Mars and would have provided a biochemically accessible source of nitrogen.
Keywords: Mars, nitrogen, astrobiology, nitrates, Curiosity
Abstract
The Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) investigation on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover has detected oxidized nitrogen-bearing compounds during pyrolysis of scooped aeolian sediments and drilled sedimentary deposits within Gale crater. Total N concentrations ranged from 20 to 250 nmol N per sample. After subtraction of known N sources in SAM, our results support the equivalent of 110–300 ppm of nitrate in the Rocknest (RN) aeolian samples, and 70–260 and 330–1,100 ppm nitrate in John Klein (JK) and Cumberland (CB) mudstone deposits, respectively. Discovery of indigenous martian nitrogen in Mars surface materials has important implications for habitability and, specifically, for the potential evolution of a nitrogen cycle at some point in martian history. The detection of nitrate in both wind-drifted fines (RN) and in mudstone (JK, CB) is likely a result of N2 fixation to nitrate generated by thermal shock from impact or volcanic plume lightning on ancient Mars. Fixed nitrogen could have facilitated the development of a primitive nitrogen cycle on the surface of ancient Mars, potentially providing a biochemically accessible source of nitrogen.
Terrestrial life requires a fixed form of nitrogen for incorporation into biomolecules such as nucleobases and amino acids that serve as building blocks for DNA, RNA, and proteins. Nitrogen in the form of N2 comprises ∼2% of the martian atmosphere (1–3), but little is known about other possible N reservoirs on Mars, including those that may contain fixed forms of N (i.e., NH3, NH4+, or NO3−) in the mantle, crust, and sediments. Although Mars currently has ∼0.15 mbar N2 in its atmosphere (1), estimates of the primordial N inventory of the martian atmosphere range from 3 to 300 mbar N2 (ref. 4, and references therein). Loss of N to impact erosion and stripping by solar wind have greatly reduced the N content of the martian atmosphere over time, the latter process resulting in a 14N/15N ratio of N2 on Mars of 173 ± 11 measured by Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) (5), in agreement with Viking lander measurements (2, 3), and reflecting an enrichment of the heavier isotope of 15N due to preferential escape of 14N (6). This enrichment in the heavier stable isotope is consistent with the behavior of other volatiles in Mars’ atmosphere (1) and consistent with the estimated 50–90% loss of volatile species to space (7).
In addition to N2 escape, the inventory of N on Mars must include potential N sequestration on the martian surface. Any N cycling on Mars requires breaking the N2 triple bond through “fixation” via oxidation or reduction of atmospheric N2. Nitrogen fixation on Earth is predominantly biological and occurs by conversion of N2 to ammonia via enzyme-catalyzed reactions, although abiotic N2 fixation also occurs at much lower levels, mostly by lightning and volcanism (e.g., ref. 8), and photolysis of marine organic N to NO3−, which has been hypothesized as a source of Atacama Desert NO3− (9). Several abiotic mechanisms have been proposed for N2 fixation on Mars (10, 11) and subsequent incorporation of N into the sedimentary record (12, 13). The presence of N species in Mars surface sediments and shallow subsurface is predicted (e.g., ref. 14) and is additionally supported by the presence of nitrates in martian meteorites (15, 16), as well as other possible N phases (17, 18).
Assigning a martian source to any nitrogen measured by Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) in samples from Gale crater (19, 20) requires rigorous analysis of N contributions from all possible sources, including terrestrial contamination from the SAM instrument itself, which we have done for this work. Here, we will (i) describe and quantify N species in scooped samples from an aeolian deposit and sedimentary materials from two drill sites in the Sheepbed mudstone as detected by SAM evolved gas analysis (EGA) and GCMS, (ii) evaluate and quantify the contributions of terrestrial N, and (iii) discuss possible N sources and implications of detection of martian N in Gale crater solid samples.
Methods
During SAM’s nominal solid-sample analysis mode, EGA is performed, in which the quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) directly analyzes the gases released from samples heated from Mars ambient to ∼870 °C at 35 °C/min under a ∼0.8-sccm He flow and a pressure of ∼25 mbar in the pyrolysis oven (21). Before analysis, a sieved (<150 μm) and portioned (<76 mm3) sample is delivered to the Sample Manipulation System and into one of SAM’s quartz-glass cups, which has been preconditioned before the experiment by heating to >800 °C under a flow of He and active pumping by SAM’s wide-range pumps. Gases evolved during pyrolysis are continuously monitored using the QMS, and a portion of the gases are sent to the hydrocarbon trap (Tenax) and then to the GCMS. The SAM instrument has been described in detail elsewhere (21, 22), and individual experimental parameters are presented in SI Text.
Data are presented for the three solid sample sites analyzed by SAM—Rocknest (RN), John Klein (JK), and Cumberland (CB). RN is an aeolian deposit consisting of fine-grained material with a bulk composition similar to martian fines previously characterized at other locations on Mars, and as such, the RN deposit is thought to be representative of both local soil and global dust on Mars (23, 24). JK and CB are both drilled samples from mudstone taken ∼1.5 m from one another, and part of the Sheepbed member of the Yellowknife Bay formation in Gale crater. These deposits are inferred to be ancient fluvio-lacustrine deposits (25), and their mineralogy (26) suggests an ancient habitable environment at this location on Mars, as well as the possibility of indigenous organic carbon preserved in this mudstone (20). Although RN contains some component of globally distributed martian dust, the JK and CB locations, drilled ∼3 m apart, represent a restricted time interval on a local scale, with a K-Ar age of 4.21 ± 0.35 billion years measured for these mudstones (27). Based on ground tests and models, the mass of the portion delivered to SAM was estimated to be 50 ± 8 mg (2σ SD) for the RN analyses (28), 45 ± 18 mg for the single portions at JK and CB, and 135 ± 31 mg for the triple portions at JK and CB (20). Multiple portions of the same sample from each site were analyzed.
Results
SAM Experiments on Mars.
EGA (Fig. 1) and GCMS (Fig. 2) detected N-containing compounds including nitric oxide (NO) (base peak m/z 30), hydrogen cyanide (HCN) (base peak m/z 27), and trifluoro-N-methyl-acetamide (TFMA) (diagnostic peak m/z 127). Abundances are shown in Table 1, and mass spectra for each compound are shown in SI Text. Fig. 2 shows two reconstructed GC chromatograms from the CB-5 sample with m/z corresponding to the base peaks for each species (solid lines) compared with CB-6–residue, which can be considered a blank for CB-5 (dotted lines). TFMA is a compound produced when N-methyl-N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) reacts with molecules containing labile hydrogen atoms, such as water. MTBSTFA, carried for one of SAM’s wet chemistry experiments, is a terrestrial N-containing compound in SAM that contributes to the background (29, 30). Cyanogen chloride (ClCN) (base peak m/z 61) and trifluoroacetonitrile (TFA) (base peak m/z 69) were also identified at low abundance (∼2–3 nmol) in GC chromatograms. The m/z 27 peak was identified as hydrogen cyanide (HCN) by matching m/z ratios of 26/27 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology database; however, definitive identification is complicated by mass interferences that can come from hydrocarbon fragments, and the HCN is poorly retained on the GC column. N2 (m/z 28), N2O (m/z 44), and NO2 (m/z 46) could not be identified or quantified due to mass spectral interferences with CO, CO2, and 12C18O16O (respectively) from other species also evolving during EGA.
Table 1.
Sample | Total detected N, nmol | HCN, nmol | NO, nmol | ClCN, nmol | TFA, nmol | TFMA, nmol | MTBSTFA-derived N, nmol* | Residual N, nmol† | Maximum % NO from MTBSTFA, % | Corrected NO, nmol‡ |
RN-Blank | 15 ± 3 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 2 | ND | ND | <1 | 49 ± 10 | 46 ± 9 | 100 | NA |
RN-1 | 215 ± 43 | 28 ± 6 | 186 ± 37 | ND | ND | <1 | 54 ± 11 | 50 ± 10 | 27 ± 8 | 135 ± 27 |
RN-2 | 321 ± 64 | 40 ± 8 | 280 ± 56 | ND | ND | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 79 ± 16 | 76 ± 15 | 27 ± 8 | 204 ± 41 |
RN-3 | 231 ± 46 | 26 ± 5 | 201 ± 41 | <1 | <1 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 70 ± 14 | 67 ± 13 | 33 ± 9 | 136 ± 27 |
RN-4 | 211 ± 42 | 25 ± 5 | 180 ± 36 | <1 | <1 | 5.0 ± 1.0 | 79 ± 16 | 75 ± 15 | 42 ± 12 | 104 ± 21 |
JK-Blank | 30 ± 6 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 26 ± 5 | ND | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 86 ± 17 | 84 ± 17 | 100 | NA |
JK-1 | 291 ± 58 | 53 ± 11 | 230 ± 46 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 127 ± 25 | 124 ± 25 | 54 ± 15 | 106 ± 21 |
JK-2 | 277 ± 55 | 46 ± 9 | 223 ± 45 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 118 ± 24 | 115 ± 23 | 52 ± 15 | 108 ± 22 |
JK-3 (3× portion) | 680 ± 136 | 83 ± 17 | 579 ± 116 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 11 ± 2 | 223 ± 45 | 221 ± 44 | 38 ± 11 | 359 ± 72 |
JK-4 | 213 ± 43 | 54 ± 11 | 152 ± 31 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 80 ± 16 | 78 ± 16 | 51 ± 14 | 75 ± 15 |
CB-Blank1 | 90 ± 18 | 24 ± 5 | 62 ± 13 | <1 | ND | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 116 ± 23 | 88 ± 18 | 100 | NA |
CB-1 | 272 ± 54 | 15 ± 3 | 246 ± 49 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 1.4 | 99 ± 20 | 71 ± 14 | 29 ± 8 | 175 ± 35 |
CB-2 | 447 ± 89 | 47 ± 10 | 391 ± 78 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 85 ± 17 | 57 ± 11 | 15 ± 4 | 334 ± 67 |
CB-3 | 551 ± 110 | 48 ± 10 | 494 ± 99 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 68 ± 14 | 40 ± 8 | 8 ± 2 | 454 ± 91 |
CB-5 | 560 ± 112 | 53 ± 11 | 502 ± 100 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | <1 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 41 ± 8 | 13 ± 3 | 3 ± 1 | 490 ± 98 |
CB-6 (3× portion)§ | 466 ± 93 | 16 ± 3 | 448 ± 90 | <1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | <1 | 35 ± 7 | 6 ± 1 | ∼1 | 443 ± 89 |
CB-6 (residue) | 88 ± 18 | 25 ± 5 | 60 ± 12 | ND | <1 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 81 ± 16 | 52 ± 10 | 86 ± 24 | NA |
CB-7 (3× portion)§ | 357 ± 71 | 11 ± 2 | 340 ± 68 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | <1 | 43 ± 9 | 13 ± 3 | 4 ± 1 | 327 ± 65 |
CB-Blank2 | 25 ± 5 | ND | 25 ± 5 | ND | ND | ND | 25 ± 5 | 25 ± 5 | 100 | NA |
Contributions of N from MTBSTFA can be used to correct for the maximum terrestrial contribution of N to NO in a worst-case scenario assumption that all MTBSTFA-N forms NO.
Total MTBSTFA-derived N in nanomoles determined from the sum of the EGA-QMS quantification of abundances of silylated products. See SI Text for details.
Residual N is the N in nanomoles resulting from subtraction of reduced N species detected in the blank for each set of experiments (RN-Blank, 2.7 ± 0.5 nmol; JK-Blank, 4.7 ± 0.9 nmol; CB-Blank1, 28 ± 6 nmol). This reduced N is assumed to be derived from MTBSTFA.
Corrected NO is derived by subtracting the nanomoles of residual N from the nanomoles of NO to take into account MTBSTFA-derived N.
In CB-6 and -7, three portions of sample were deposited into a hot cup (∼250 °C), driving off a significant amount of all N species before the sample analysis. The calculated abundances of N-bearing species are included for completeness but are expected to differ from previous CB runs because of the way the samples were handled before analysis (Table 1 and SI Text).
The reduced N species TFMA, ClCN, TFA, and HCN were detected at all sites (Fig. 1). All reduced species evolve at low temperature and peak before 300 °C. Generally, HCN is two times more abundant at JK and CB than at RN. HCN is present in all experiments above blank levels except for in CB-1. ClCN and TFA coevolve with HCN in all experiments in small amounts (2–3 nmol) but are more abundant at JK and CB than RN, where both are only present at subnanomole levels (Table 1).
The most abundant and variable species across the three samples is NO (Table 1 and Fig. 1), which generally evolves coincident with the onset of the oxygen release associated with thermal decomposition of chlorinated oxidants (20, 29). The average abundance of NO in RN1-4 is 212 ± 46 nmol and the release can be deconvolved into at least three NO evolutions: (i) a broad peak starting at 150 °C, centered at ∼275 °C; (ii) a similarly broad release between 300 and 400 °C overlapping with the first release; and (iii) a sharper peak centered at ∼475 °C. For JK, NO evolves in three major peaks centered at ∼250, 300, and 400 °C, with total NO abundance similar to RN (JK single portion average of 202 ± 43 nmol). Unlike RN, there was no large evolution of NO >400 °C at JK or CB. CB shows the highest NO abundances of 462 ± 62 nmol for the average of CB single portions. The NO evolution from CB starts <200 °C, just before the onset of oxygen, followed by large peak at (275 °C) with shoulders at 350 and 425 °C (Fig. 1.)
Blanks and Instrument Background.
The terrestrial derivatization reagent MTBSTFA contributed to the SAM background in both the blanks and in samples (29, 30). Masses associated with all of the N compounds detected by SAM EGA are also detected in laboratory experiments performing EGA on fused silica doped with MTBSTFA and 1 wt % perchlorate (SI Text). MTBSTFA has one N atom and is therefore a potential source of N that could react with other species from the sample. Therefore, terrestrial N sources must be quantified to verify that the N detected is martian. The method to quantify MTBSTFA-derived nitrogen is modified from the method to quantify MTBSTFA-derived carbon from Ming et al. (20) and is detailed in SI Text. Estimates for MTSBTFA- derived N are compared with total detected N and used to adjust NO abundances (Table 1).
Discussion
Constraining MTBSFTA Sources of N.
Total N detected in SAM EGA is more abundant than N estimates from MTBSTFA contributions (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Estimated MTBSTFA contribution to N for RN, JK, and CB blanks is larger than the actual amount of N detected in any of these blanks (Table 1). This “missing N” may simply be attributed to the high likelihood that our worst-case scenario calculations of MTBSTFA-derived N are overestimates.
It is difficult from laboratory experiments to determine the MTBSTFA-N contribution to individual N species detected in martian samples. An experiment reheating sample CB-6 after reexposure to the sample carousel, where the sample would have been in contact with MTBSTFA vapor, suggests that reduced species are predominantly MTBSTFA derived, but that NO is produced by thermal decomposition of martian sediments. This is further supported by the consistent evolution temperature of HCN (and ClCN) in RN, JK, and CB EGA pyrograms (Fig. 1), whereas there is considerable variation in the NO release profile across the three sites.
Nevertheless, to demonstrate the strength of the evidence for a martian NO source in these samples, we assume a worst-case scenario in which all MTBSTFA-derived N (minus reduced species present in SAM experimental blanks) is combusted to NO, even though laboratory experiments indicate that reduced species HCN, TFMA, TFA, and ClCN are also formed, and our CB-6 reheat experiment supports an MTBSTFA source for these reduced species. Based on our calculations, MTBSTFA contributed 27–42% of the NO at RN, 38–54% at JK, and 1–29% at CB (Table 1). If we take a slightly less conservative but more realistic approach and assume that the reduced species observed are predominantly products of MTBSTFA decomposition, then MTBSTFA contributed 13–27% of the NO at RN, 14–30% at JK, and 1–10% at CB.
N-Bearing Species Distribution.
NO is the dominant N-bearing species in the RN, JK, and CB samples, and is more abundant than our estimates for total MTBSTFA-derived N. The main source of NO in these samples has been suggested to be thermal decomposition of nitrates present in the samples (31). Thermal decomposition of nitrates is possible at the temperatures observed in SAM EGA data (decomposition begins at <200 °C), particularly if iron nitrates are present (32). Alkali (e.g., Na, K) and alkaline earth (e.g., Mg, Ca) metal nitrates generally decompose into nitric oxide at elevated temperatures (>560 °C); however, their decomposition temperatures can decrease in the presence of perchlorates and metal oxides (31, 33). Alternative or additional sources of NO include combustion of labile organic nitrogen-bearing compounds (other than MTBSTFA) under oxidizing conditions (34). However, this would represent a large amount of organic N, and as no organic compounds of martian origin have been definitively identified, an inorganic source of N is the more plausible origin for the NO.
Additional laboratory experiments to characterize the thermal decomposition temperatures of calcium nitrate tetrahydrate [Ca(NO3)2•4H2O; Sigma], iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate [Fe(NO3)3•9H2O; Sigma], and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate [Mg(NO3)2•6H2O; Sigma] for comparison with SAM EGA data were performed using a custom-built SAM-like laboratory system (SI Text). Onset of m/z 30 evolution of each species can be diagnostic of the source of NO in martian solid samples: ∼100 °C for Fe(NO3)3, ∼300 °C for Mg(NO3)2, and ∼500 °C for Ca(NO3)2. Both JK and CB have their primary peak maximums ∼300 °C, whereas the release profile at RN includes a peak maximum ∼300 °C as well as a second one ∼450 °C, consistent with the double peak release shown by Fe(NO3)3 (Fig. 4). The two-step decomposition of Fe(NO3)3 has been noted in the literature (32) and is characterized by a lower temperature release occurring over a broad temperature range, followed by a second, sharper release over a narrower range of temperature. This two-step release is thought to be a result of dehydration accompanied by hydrolysis, in which iron nitrate melts in its own water of crystallization followed by the evaporation and precipitation of Fe(OH)NO3, ultimately resulting in the formation of Fe2O3 as the final product.
Although HCN is generally present at higher abundances in samples than in blanks, at present it is difficult to assign a nonterrestrial origin to this compound. However, it is not unreasonable to assume that pyrolysis of martian surface materials may produce HCN from macromolecular material of meteoritic, cometary, and interplanetary dust particle origin (35, 36).
Significance of Results.
Detection of indigenous, fixed N in martian rocks and sediments has significant implications for the past habitability potential of Mars, as life on Earth requires bioavailability of N for synthesis of key biomolecules. Several hypotheses exist for mechanisms of cycling of N on Mars and these depend upon breaking the N2 triple bond through “fixation” or reduction of atmospheric N2. Detection of NO formed from products of O2, CO2, and N2 photodissociation in the martian thermosphere by Mars Express was reported in 2005 (37). This suggests that N is currently being fixed in the martian thermosphere, although it is unknown how much, if any, is transported to the lower atmosphere and surface. Thermal shock, either from lightning or impact, has been the favored mechanism by which the N2 bond could have been broken in the early martian (and terrestrial) atmosphere, resulting in HNO−, which reacts to form NO2− and NO3− in the presence of liquid water (4, 12, 38, 39). If NO detected by SAM EGA is attributable to the decomposition of nitrates, as laboratory experiments suggest, this would imply that (i) N fixation has occurred on Mars, and (ii) a biochemically available source of N is present on Mars and likely was in the past.
Based on estimates of sample mass and corrections for terrestrial N contribution, nitrogen present as NO in Gale crater is equivalent to 20–250 ppm N, with the highest concentrations in the CB mudstone. Converted to the equivalent amount of nitrate, this gives 110–300 ppm of nitrate in the RN aeolian samples, 70–260 ppm nitrate in JK mudstone samples, and 330–1,100 ppm nitrate in CB mudstone samples. Manning et al. (40) calculated an impact generated nitrate reservoir of ∼5 × 1015 mol on Mars that is unlikely to have experienced significant decomposition. This translates into ∼0.11 wt % NO3, using a 950-m impact veneer depth (e.g., ref. 40) and a soil density of 2 g/cm3, and is consistent with the upper limit of our detection of ∼0.11 wt % NO3 at CB. Our detections also fall within the estimates of nitrate concentration from meteorites, which vary widely from recent detection of 4,800 ± 60 ppm nitrate in the martian meteorite EETA79001 (15) to previous estimates of >1 ppm (16).
The detection of nitrate at one site representing the martian global dust/local soil reservoir and two representing a potential relict lakebed (25) may suggest widespread atmospheric deposition. The hyperarid Atacama Desert provides a terrestrial analog for abiotic N fixation and deposition, as biological inputs are severely limited, and oxidized N is stored in soils as nitrate instead of being removed via denitrification or leaching by water (9). Understanding whether similar processes are currently fixing N2 to NO3 and subsequently depositing nitrate on the martian surface is compelling for the habitability of Mars in the present and recent past. The abundances detected in all three Mars samples (∼0.01–0.1 wt % NO3) are an order of magnitude lower than those in the Atacama Desert and Dry Valleys of Antarctica, which range from ∼0.1 to >1 wt % NO3 (e.g., ref. 41) and can be as high as 36% in Atacama Desert nitrate ore deposits (42). The low nitrate abundance in martian samples is consistent with models of the impact-generated nitrate reservoir (e.g., ref. 40), suggesting that we are detecting the products of ancient N-fixation processes under different atmospheric conditions, with no additional inputs, and negligible decomposition of the original reservoir. The difference in abundance between JK mudstone (0.01–0.03 wt % NO3) and CB mudstone (up to ∼0.1 wt % NO3), two mudstone samples taken ∼1.5 m apart, could reflect postdepositional leaching of NO3 from JK, which shows evidence of more alteration than CB (26). Alternatively, increased nitrate abundance at CB could reflect additional past input via some in situ fixation mechanism, biological or not. Detection of indigenous reduced N (e.g., ammonia) would support biological fixation; however, not only is ammonia difficult to detect by SAM (SI Text), but it is readily destroyed by photochemistry, and thus not likely to have been preserved unless structurally incorporated into minerals. One interpretation for the persistence of oxidized N and the apparent lack of reduced N in a lacustrine environment is the absence of development of chemistry to return N into the atmosphere [on Earth, the biological process of denitrification (43)]. Thus, despite the fact that these ancient aqueous environments represented by Yellowknife Bay sediments on Mars once had a high potential for habitability (25), our analysis of these sediments does not support the presence of a complex N cycle analogous to that which drives life on Earth.
Conclusion
Nitrogen species were detected in pyrolysis of one sample scooped from an aeolian deposit and two samples drilled from the same sedimentary rock unit in Yellowknife Bay. The molar abundance of N in these samples exceeds that predicted to be present due to all known terrestrial instrument sources. The bulk of the N detected is in the form of nitric oxide (NO) and may indicate a mineralogical sink for atmospheric N2 in the form of nitrate, with estimated abundance of up to ∼1,100 ppm NO3− in martian sedimentary deposits. The detection of NO in both wind-drifted fines (RN) and in mudstone (JK, CB) likely reflects ancient impact and/or volcanic plume lightning generated N2 fixation to NO3 (10–12). Fixed N is essential to terrestrial life, and this requirement has driven the evolution of metabolism on Earth. The presence of fixed N on Mars suggests that, at some point, the first half of a nitrogen cycle was established. On Earth, N is cycled back into the atmosphere by denitrification via biological activity, but on Mars, the probable absence of near-surface life in post-Noachian times would result in fixed N accumulating as nitrate in the martian geologic record. Nevertheless, if pre-Noachian life had arisen on Mars, it is reasonable to assume that it exploited the available nitrate, and our results suggest that the search for stratigraphic evidence of an ancient martian N cycle should continue.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for support from the entire Sample Analysis at Mars and Mars Science Laboratory operations, engineering, and scientific teams. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mars Exploration Program and Goddard Space Flight Center provided support for the development and operation of SAM. SAM-GC was supported by funds from the French Space Agency (Centre National d’Études Spatiales). Data from these SAM experiments are archived in the Planetary Data System (pds.nasa.gov).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
2A complete list of the MSL Science Team is available in Supporting Information.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1420932112/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Mahaffy PR, et al. MSL Science Team Abundance and isotopic composition of gases in the martian atmosphere from the Curiosity rover. Science. 2013;341(6143):263–266. doi: 10.1126/science.1237966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nier A, McElroy MB. Composition and structure of Mars' upper atmosphere: Results from the neutral mass spectrometers on Viking 1 and 2. J Geophys Res. 1977;82(28):4341–4349. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Owen T, et al. The composition of the atmosphere at the surface of Mars. J Geophys Res. 1977;82(28):4635–4639. [Google Scholar]
- 4.McKay CP, Stoker CR. The early environment and its evolution on Mars: Implication for life. Rev Geophys. 1989;27(2):189–214. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wong MH, et al. Isotopes of nitrogen on Mars: Atmospheric measurements by Curiosity's mass spectrometer. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40(23):6033–6037. doi: 10.1002/2013GL057840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jakosky BM, Pepin RO, Johnson RE, Fox JL. Mars atmospheric loss and isotopic fractionation by solar-wind-induced sputtering and photochemical escape. Icarus. 1994;111(2):271–288. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jakosky BM, Phillips RJ. Mars’ volatile and climate history. Nature. 2001;412(6843):237–244. doi: 10.1038/35084184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oyarzun J, Oyarzun R. Massive volcanism in the Altiplano-Puna Volcanic Plateau and formation of the huge Atacama Desert nitrate deposits: A case for thermal and electric fixation of atmospheric nitrogen. Int Geol Rev. 2007;49(10):962–968. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ewing SA, et al. Rainfall limit of the N cycle on Earth. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2007;21(3):1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Segura A, Navarro-González R. Nitrogen fixation on early Mars by volcanic lightning and other sources. Geophys Res Lett. 2005;32(5):L05203. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Summers DP, Khare B. Nitrogen fixation on early Mars and other terrestrial planets: Experimental demonstration of abiotic fixation reactions to nitrite and nitrate. Astrobiology. 2007;7(2):333–341. doi: 10.1089/ast.2006.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mancinelli RL, McKay CP. The evolution of nitrogen cycling. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1988;18(4):311–325. doi: 10.1007/BF01808213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Summers DP, Chang S. Prebiotic ammonia from reduction of nitrite by iron (II) on the early Earth. Nature. 1993;365:630–633. doi: 10.1038/365630a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Manning CV, McKay CP, Zahnle KJ. The nitrogen cycle on Mars: Impact decomposition of near-surface nitrates as a source for a nitrogen steady state. Icarus. 2008;197(1):60–64. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kounaves SP, Carrier BL, O’Neil GD, Stroble ST, Claire MW. Evidence of martian perchlorate, chlorate, and nitrate in Mars meteorite EETA79001: Implications for oxidants and organics. Icarus. 2014;229:206–213. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grady M, Wright I, Pillinger C. A search for nitrates in Martian meteorites. J Geophys Res Planets. 1995;100(E3):5449–5455. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fogel ML, Steele A. Nitrogen in extraterrestrial environments: Clues to the possible presence of life. Elements. 2013;9(5):367–372. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aoudjehane HC, et al. Tissint martian meteorite: A fresh look at the interior, surface, and atmosphere of Mars. Science. 2012;338(6108):785–788. doi: 10.1126/science.1224514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Archer PD, et al. Abundances and implications of volatile-bearing species from evolved gas analysis of the Rocknest aeolian deposit, Gale crater, Mars. J Geophys Res Planets. 2014;119(1):237–254. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ming DW, et al. MSL Science Team Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars. Science. 2014;343(6169):1245267. doi: 10.1126/science.1245267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mahaffy P, et al. The Sample Analysis at Mars investigation and instrument suite. Space Sci Rev. 2012;170(1-4):401–478. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Franz HB, et al. Analytical techniques for retrieval of atmospheric composition with the quadrupole mass spectrometer of the Sample Analysis at Mars instrument suite on Mars Science Laboratory. Planet Space Sci. 2014;96:99–113. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bish DL, et al. MSL Science Team X-ray diffraction results from Mars Science Laboratory: Mineralogy of Rocknest at Gale crater. Science. 2013;341(6153):1238932. doi: 10.1126/science.1238932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Blake DF, et al. MSL Science Team Curiosity at Gale crater, Mars: Characterization and analysis of the Rocknest sand shadow. Science. 2013;341(6153):1239505. doi: 10.1126/science.1239505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grotzinger JP, et al. MSL Science Team A habitable fluvio-lacustrine environment at Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars. Science. 2014;343(6169):1242777. doi: 10.1126/science.1242777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vaniman DT, et al. MSL Science Team Mineralogy of a mudstone at Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars. Science. 2014;343(6169):1243480. doi: 10.1126/science.1243480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Farley KA, et al. MSL Science Team In situ radiometric and exposure age dating of the martian surface. Science. 2014;343(6169):1247166. doi: 10.1126/science.1247166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Anderson RC, et al. Collecting samples in Gale crater, Mars; an overview of the Mars Science Laboratory sample acquisition, sample processing and handling system. Space Sci Rev. 2012;170(1-4):57–75. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Glavin DP, et al. Evidence for perchlorates and the origin of chlorinated hydrocarbons detected by SAM at the Rocknest aeolian deposit in Gale crater. J Geophys Res Planets. 2013;118(10):1955–1973. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leshin LA, et al. MSL Science Team Volatile, isotope, and organic analysis of martian fines with the Mars Curiosity rover. Science. 2013;341(6153):1238937. doi: 10.1126/science.1238937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Navarro-González R, et al. 2013. Possible detection of nitrates on Mars by the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument. Lunar Planet Sci XLIV (Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston), 2648.
- 32.Wieczorek-Ciurowa K, Kozak A. The thermal decomposition of Fe (NO3)3•9H2O. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1999;58(3):647–651. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hoshino Y, Utsunomiya T, Abe O. The thermal decomposition of sodium nitrate and the effects of several oxides on the decomposition. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1981;54(5):1385–1391. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Navarro-González R, Iñiguez E, de la Rosa J, McKay CP. Characterization of organics, microorganisms, desert soils, and Mars-like soils by thermal volatilization coupled to mass spectrometry and their implications for the search for organics on Mars by Phoenix and future space missions. Astrobiology. 2009;9(8):703–715. doi: 10.1089/ast.2008.0284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ehrenfreund P, Charnley SB. Organic molecules in the interstellar medium, comets, and meteorites: A voyage from dark clouds to the early Earth. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys. 2000;38(1):427–483. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sephton MA. Pyrolysis and mass spectrometry studies of meteoritic organic matter. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2012;31(5):560–569. doi: 10.1002/mas.20354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bertaux J-L, et al. SPICAM Team Nightglow in the upper atmosphere of Mars and implications for atmospheric transport. Science. 2005;307(5709):566–569. doi: 10.1126/science.1106957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mancinelli RL. The search for nitrogen compounds on the surface of Mars. Adv Space Res. 1996;18(12):241–248. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Navarro-González R, Molina MJ, Molina LT. Nitrogen fixation by volcanic lightning in the early Earth. Geophys Res Lett. 1998;25(16):3123–3126. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Manning CV, Zahnle KJ, McKay CP. Impact processing of nitrogen on early Mars. Icarus. 2009;199(2):273–285. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kounaves SP, et al. Discovery of natural perchlorate in the Antarctic Dry Valleys and its global implications. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(7):2360–2364. doi: 10.1021/es9033606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ericksen GE. The Chilean nitrate deposits. Am Sci. 1983;71:366–374. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Capone DG, Popa R, Flood B, Nealson KH. Geochemistry. Follow the nitrogen. Science. 2006;312(5774):708–709. doi: 10.1126/science.1111863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.