Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2015 Apr 10;59(5):2938–2941. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05080-14

Impact of β-Lactamase Inhibition on the Activity of Ceftaroline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus

Vincent Dubée a,b,c,d, Daria Soroka a,b,c, Mélanie Cortes a,b,c, Anne-Laure Lefebvre a,b,c, Laurent Gutmann a,b,c,e, Jean-Emmanuel Hugonnet a,b,c, Michel Arthur a,b,c, Jean-Luc Mainardi a,b,c,e,
PMCID: PMC4394810  PMID: 25733512

Abstract

The production of β-lactamases BlaMab and BlaC contributes to β-lactam resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, respectively. Ceftaroline was efficiently hydrolyzed by these enzymes. Inhibition of M. tuberculosis BlaC by clavulanate decreased the ceftaroline MIC from ≥256 to 16 to 64 μg/ml, but these values are clinically irrelevant. In contrast, the ceftaroline-avibactam combination should be evaluated against M. abscessus since it inhibited growth at lower and potentially achievable drug concentrations.

TEXT

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is responsible for more than 1 million deaths annually, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains constitutes a serious threat for the control of the tuberculosis pandemic (1). In this context, there is an urgent need for new antituberculosis drugs. Mycobacterium abscessus raises radically different issues (2). In recent years, this fast-growing mycobacterium has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen responsible for lung infections, especially in cystic fibrosis patients (3, 4). It also causes epidemics of skin and soft tissue infections, mainly after iatrogenic or accidental inoculation (5, 6). M. abscessus is naturally highly resistant to most antibiotics (7), including antituberculosis drugs. The recommended treatment of pulmonary infections comprises a combination of clarithromycin, amikacin, and an intravenous β-lactam, either cefoxitin or imipenem, for at least 12 months (2). This treatment achieves microbiological cure (sputum conversion without relapse) in ca. 60% of cases (8, 9). However, the cure rate is only 25 to 40% in case of clarithromycin resistance mediated by an Erm rRNA methylase (911), which is produced by 40 to 60% of isolates (11).

Mycobacteria are intrinsically resistant to most β-lactams due to the production of broad-spectrum β-lactamases in combination with low affinity of the drug targets and limited permeability of the cell wall (1214). The former mechanism can be counteracted by β-lactamase inhibitors, which display various efficiencies for enzymes from different species (15, 16). Clavulanate irreversibly inactivates the Ambler class A β-lactamase BlaC from M. tuberculosis (17), whereas BlaMab from M. abscessus hydrolyzes this drug (18). We have recently shown that avibactam, a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, efficiently inhibits BlaMab and extends the spectrum of β-lactams active against M. abscessus (19).

Ceftaroline is a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against bacteria producing low-affinity penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (20) and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (21). Ceftaroline fosamil, a ceftaroline prodrug, has recently been approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infection and community-acquired pulmonary infections. In this study, we investigate the in vitro activity of ceftaroline in combination with clavulanate or avibactam against β-lactamase-producing or β-lactamase-deficient strains of M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus.

(This work was presented in part at the 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [22].)

To assess β-lactamase activity, BlaC and BlaMab were purified and kinetic parameters for ceftaroline hydrolysis were determined by spectrophotometry (Δε of 6,300 M−1 cm−1 at 306 nm), as previously described (18). Both enzymes hydrolyzed ceftaroline with relatively high catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km = 5.5 × 104 M−1 s−1 and 1.6 × 104 M−1 s−1, respectively) in comparison to those of other cephalosporins (Table 1). This observation suggests that being combined with β-lactamase inhibitors could increase the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline.

TABLE 1.

Kinetic parameters for hydrolysis of β-lactams by BlaC and BlaMaba

β-Lactam BlaC
BlaMab
Km (μM) kcat (s−1) kcat/Km (s−1 M−1) Km (μM) kcat (s−1) kcat/Km (s−1 M−1)
Amoxicillin 44 ± 6 5.8 ± 0.2 1.3 × 105 890 ± 200 780 ± 50 8.8 × 105
Nitrocefin 71 ± 11 35 ± 2 4.9 × 105 24 ± 7.0 1000 ± 70 4.3 × 107
Cephalothin 260 ± 50 23 ± 2 8.8 × 104 17 ± 1.0 6.7 ± 0.1 4.1 × 105
Ceftriaxone >200 >0.06 1.7 × 102 >350 >0.3 5.0 × 102
Cefoxitin 140 ± 30 1.1 ± 0.1 7.9 × 103 500 ± 270 0.0003 ± 0.0001 6.7 × 100
Ceftaroline >300 >4.5 1.6 × 104 >400 >22 5.5 × 104
Imipenem 140 ± 30 0.13 ± 0.02 8.3 × 102 90 ± 40 2.7 ± 0.3 3.0 × 104
Meropenem 1.0 ± 0.2 0.0003 ± 0.00002 3.3 × 102 120 ± 20 1.8 ± 0.2 1.5 × 104
a

Data for β-lactams other than ceftaroline are from reference 18. Km and kcat data include the plus-or-minus standard error of the best fit.

Ceftaroline antituberculosis activity was assessed using the alamarBlue test (23). Briefly, M. tuberculosis strains H37Rv and CDC1551 were grown to the exponential phase (optical density of 1 at 600 nm) in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco) supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80, 0.2% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.085% (wt/vol) NaCl, 0.2% (wt/vol) dextrose, and 0.5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (24). The bacterial suspension was diluted 200-fold in the same medium and used to inoculate sterile round-bottom 96-well plates containing serial 2-fold dilutions of ceftaroline with or without 2.5 μg/ml clavulanate. The total volume of each well was 200 μl. After 6 days of incubation at 37°C, 20 μl of a sterile 0.025% (wt/vol) resazurin solution was added to each well, and the plates were incubated overnight. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration preventing the resazurin color change from blue to pink or violet. Ceftaroline alone did not inhibit the growth of β-lactamase-producing M. tuberculosis at clinically relevant concentrations (MIC, ≥256 μg/ml) (Table 2). The addition of clavulanate or deletion of the blaC gene (12) decreased the ceftaroline MIC to 16 to 64 μg/ml, indicating that the production of BlaC limits the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline.

TABLE 2.

Activity of ceftaroline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Day(s) of dosinga Strain Ceftaroline MIC (μg/ml)b
Without Clav With Clav
0 H37Rv 256 32
H37Rv ΔblaC 32 16
CDC1551 ≥256 64
0 and 3 H37Rv 256 32
H37Rv ΔblaC 16 16
CDC1551 ≥256 48
a

Ceftaroline was dosed once at the beginning of the experiment (day 0) or additionally at day 3 (days 0 and 3) to compensate for spontaneous drug hydrolysis.

b

Data are the median results from at least three independent experiments. MICs were determined in the absence or presence of clavulanic acid (Clav) at 2.5 μg/ml.

Since the MIC determinations required extended incubation of slow-growing M. tuberculosis, spontaneous hydrolysis of ceftaroline was assessed in the culture medium by spectrophotometry, revealing a half-life of 4.8 days at 37°C (data not shown). Compensating for spontaneous drug hydrolysis by the addition of ceftaroline after 4 days of incubation (Table 2) showed that the low activity of ceftaroline was not the consequence of its chemical instability. Together, these results indicate that ceftaroline is of little interest for the treatment of tuberculosis since the maximal drug concentration achieved in plasma (21 μg/ml) for an intravenous injection of 600 mg (25) does not exceed the MICs observed in the absence of a functional β-lactamase (16 to 64 μg/ml).

The in vitro activity of ceftaroline was also assessed against M. abscessus strain CIP104536 and its β-lactamase-deficient (ΔblaMab) derivative (19) (Table 3). The MICs of ceftaroline and the reference β-lactams cefoxitin and imipenem were determined using the microdilution method in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (CaMH) broth, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (26). As previously described (19), avibactam had no impact on the MICs of cefoxitin and imipenem (Table 3). Ceftaroline alone was not active against the wild-type strain (MIC, >256 μg/ml) but inhibited the growth of the ΔblaMab derivative at 16 μg/ml. For the wild-type strain, the inhibition of BlaMab by avibactam (4 μg/ml) led to a MIC of ceftaroline of 32 μg/ml. Thus, ceftaroline was as active as the reference β-lactam cefoxitin in the absence of functional BlaMab.

TABLE 3.

Activities of β-lactams against M. abscessus

Growth mediuma Strainb MIC (μg/ml)c
Cefoxitin Imipenem Ceftaroline
CaMH CIP104536 32 8 >256
CaMH + Avi CIP104536 32 8 32
CaMH ΔblaMab strain 32 4 16
7H9sB CIP104536 16 4 8
7H9sB + Avi CIP104536 8 2 1
7H9sB ΔblaMab strain 8 2 2
a

CaMH, cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth; 7H9sB, Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80 and 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase; + Avi, the medium was supplemented with 4 μg/ml of avibactam.

b

ΔblaMab strain, β-lactamase-deficient derivative of CIP104536 obtained by deletion of gene blaMab.

c

Data are the median results from at least three independent experiments. The breakpoints recommended by CSLI for cefoxitin and imipenem MICs determined in CaMH medium are as follows. Cefoxitin: susceptible, ≤16 μg/ml; intermediate, 32 to 64 μg/ml; resistant, ≥128 μg/ml. Imipenem: susceptible, ≤4 μg/ml; intermediate, 8 to 16 μg/ml; resistant, ≥32 μg/ml.

We have previously compared the in vitro activities of β-lactams against M. abscessus in the reference medium, CaMH, and in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80 and 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase (OADC; Becton-Dickinson). The latter medium (7H9sB) supports faster growth of M. abscessus and provides lower estimates of the MICs of imipenem and, to a lesser extent, cefoxitin, as determined for a collection of clinical isolates (27). Avibactam is also less active in CaMH than in 7H9sB medium (19). In the current study, the MICs of ceftaroline were >32- and 8-fold higher in CaMH than in 7H9sB medium against M. abscessus CIP104536 and its ΔblaMab derivative, respectively (Table 3). These differences might result from membrane permeabilization by Tween 80, which is only present in the 7H9sB medium (27). Breakpoints have been defined by CLSI for cefoxitin and imipenem (Table 3, footnote c), but the predictive value of these breakpoints for in vivo efficacy remains poorly evaluated.

In the absence of functional BlaMab following deletion of blaMab or inhibition of the enzyme by avibactam, the MICs of ceftaroline were intermediary between those of cefoxitin and imipenem in CaMH medium and similar to those of the most active β-lactam (imipenem) in 7H9sB medium (Table 3). The activity of ceftaroline alone or in combination with avibactam was also evaluated in 7H9sB medium against 10 unrelated clinical isolates of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, mostly from cystic fibrosis patients (27, 28) (Table 4). In the absence of avibactam, the MICs of ceftaroline ranged from 2 to 64 μg/ml. In the presence of 4 μg/ml of avibactam, the MICs of ceftaroline decreased to 0.5 to 2 μg/ml. These observations indicate that the combination of avibactam and ceftaroline should be evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to clarithromycin-resistant M. abscessus, which are associated with therapeutic failures.

TABLE 4.

MICs of ceftaroline alone or in combination with avibactam determined in 7H9sBa against clinical isolates of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii

Isolate Subspecies Colony morphotypeb MIC (μg/ml)c
Ceftaroline Ceftaroline + avibactam
1 abscessus S 4 0.5
2 abscessus R 64 2
3 abscessus S 4 0.5
4 abscessus S 4 1
5 abscessus S 4 0.5
6 abscessus R 16 1
7 abscessus R 8 2
8 abscessus R 16 2
9 bolletii S 2 1
10 bolletii R 8 2
a

7H9sB, Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 80 and 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase.

b

S, smooth morphotype; R, rough morphotype.

c

Data are the median results from three independent experiments. Avibactam was used at 4 μg/ml.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Poste d'accueil to V.D.), by funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 261378 (Ph.D. fellowship to D.S.) and by Vaincre la Mucoviscidose and the Association Grégory Lemarchal (Ph.D. fellowship to A.-L. L.).

We acknowledge Jean-Louis Gaillard, Jean-Louis Herrmann, and Beate Heyme for the gift of M. abscessus clinical isolates.

Avibactam and ceftaroline were gifts from AstraZeneca. J.-L. M. has received consulting fees (scientific advisor for ceftaroline) and reimbursement of travel expenses (attendance at the 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy) from AstraZeneca.

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. 2013. Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K. 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leung JM, Olivier KN. 2013. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: the changing epidemiology and treatment challenges in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 19:662–669. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328365ab33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Medjahed H, Gaillard JL, Reyrat JM. 2010. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new player in the mycobacterial field. Trends Microbiol 18:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Furuya EY, Paez A, Srinivasan A, Cooksey R, Augenbraun M, Baron M, Brudney K, Della-Latta P, Estivariz C, Fischer S, Flood M, Kellner P, Roman C, Yakrus M, Weiss D, Granowitz EV. 2008. Outbreak of Mycobacterium abscessus wound infections among “lipotourists” from the United States who underwent abdominoplasty in the Dominican Republic. Clin Infect Dis 46:1181–1188. doi: 10.1086/529191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ryu HJ, Kim WJ, Oh CH, Song HJ. 2005. Iatrogenic Mycobacterium abscessus infection associated with acupuncture: clinical manifestations and its treatment. Int J Dermatol 44:846–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jarand J, Levin A, Zhang L, Huitt G, Mitchell JD, Daley CL. 2011. Clinical and microbiologic outcomes in patients receiving treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. Clin Infect Dis 52:565–571. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koh WJ, Jeon K, Lee NY, Kim BJ, Kook YH, Lee SH, Park YK, Kim CK, Shin SJ, Huitt GA, Daley CL, Kwon OJ. 2011. Clinical significance of differentiation of Mycobacterium massiliense from Mycobacterium abscessus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:405–410. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0395OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lyu J, Kim BJ, Song JW, Choi CM, Oh YM, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS, Shim TS. 2014. A shorter treatment duration may be sufficient for patients with Mycobacterium massiliense lung disease than with Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease. Respir Med 108:1706–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roux AL, Catherinot E, Soismier N, Heym B, Bellis G, Lemonnier L, Chiron R, Fauroux B, Le Bourgeois M, Munck A, Pin I, Sermet I, Gutierrez C, Veziris N, Jarlier V, Cambau E, Herrmann JL, Guillemot D, Gaillard JL, OMA Group. 2015. Comparing Mycobacterium massiliense and Mycobacterium abscessus lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros 14:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flores AR, Parsons LM, Pavelka MS Jr. 2005. Genetic analysis of the beta-lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis and susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Microbiology 151:521–532. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27629-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jarlier V, Nikaido H. 1990. Permeability barrier to hydrophilic solutes in Mycobacterium chelonei. J Bacteriol 172:1418–1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sauvage E, Fonze E, Quinting B, Galleni M, Frere JM, Charlier P. 2006. Crystal structure of the Mycobacterium fortuitum class A beta-lactamase: structural basis for broad substrate specificity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2516–2521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01226-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cynamon MH, Palmer GS. 1983. In vitro activity of amoxicillin in combination with clavulanic acid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 24:429–431. doi: 10.1128/AAC.24.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hugonnet JE, Tremblay LW, Boshoff HI, Barry CE III, Blanchard JS. 2009. Meropenem-clavulanate is effective against extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 323:1215–1218. doi: 10.1126/science.1167498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hugonnet JE, Blanchard JS. 2007. Irreversible inhibition of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-lactamase by clavulanate. Biochemistry 46:11998–12004. doi: 10.1021/bi701506h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soroka D, Dubee V, Soulier-Escrihuela O, Cuinet G, Hugonnet JE, Gutmann L, Mainardi JL, Arthur M. 2014. Characterization of broad-spectrum Mycobacterium abscessus class A beta-lactamase. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:691–696. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dubee V, Bernut A, Cortes M, Lesne T, Dorchene D, Lefebvre A-L, Hugonnet J-E, Gutmann L, Mainardi J-L, Herrmann J-L, Gaillard J-L, Kremer L, Arthur M. 2015. β-Lactamase inhibition by avibactam in Mycobacterium abscessus. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1051–1058. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Villegas-Estrada A, Lee M, Hesek D, Vakulenko SB, Mobashery S. 2008. Co-opting the cell wall in fighting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: potent inhibition of PBP 2a by two anti-MRSA beta-lactam antibiotics. J Am Chem Soc 130:9212–9213. doi: 10.1021/ja8029448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McGee L, Biek D, Ge Y, Klugman M, du Plessis M, Smith AM, Beall B, Whitney CG, Klugman KP. 2009. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against cephalosporin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:552–556. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01324-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dubée V, Triboulet S, Hugonnet J-E, Gutmann L, Arthur M, Mainardi J-L. Abstr 54th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother, poster C-1405. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Franzblau SG, Witzig RS, McLaughlin JC, Torres P, Madico G, Hernandez A, Degnan MT, Cook MB, Quenzer VK, Ferguson RM, Gilman RH. 1998. Rapid, low-technology MIC determination with clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using the microplate alamar blue assay. J Clin Microbiol 36:362–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marrero J, Rhee KY, Schnappinger D, Pethe K, Ehrt S. 2010. Gluconeogenic carbon flow of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates is critical for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to establish and maintain infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9819–9824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000715107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Poon H, Chang MH, Fung HB. 2012. Ceftaroline fosamil: a cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Ther 34:743–765. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Woods GL, Brown-Elliott BA, Conville PS. 2011. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard, 2nd ed CLSI document M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lavollay M, Dubee V, Heym B, Herrmann JL, Gaillard JL, Gutmann L, Arthur M, Mainardi JL. 2014. In vitro activity of cefoxitin and imipenem against Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:O297–O300. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Macheras E, Roux AL, Bastian S, Leão SC, Palaci M, Sivadon-Tardy V, Gutierrez C, Richter E, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Pfyffer G, Bodmer T, Cambau E, Gaillard JL, Heym B. 2011. Multilocus sequence analysis and rpoB sequencing of Mycobacterium abscessus (sensu lato) strains. J Clin Microbiol 49:491–499. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01274-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES