Abstract
Solitary fibrous tumors represent fewer than 2% of all soft tissue tumors, and only about 12–15% of them occur in the head and neck. We report a case of a 38-year-old male who presented with a six-month history of increasing right cheek swelling. Computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses with contrast demonstrated a well-circumscribed avidly enhancing mass in the right retroantral fat. On magnetic resonance imaging the lesion was homogenously slightly hyperintense to muscle on T1 weighted and T2 weighted images and enhanced avidly with contrast. Surgical resection was performed and pathology was consistent with solitary fibrous tumor. There have been very few reported cases of solitary fibrous tumors in the infratemporal fossa and none described as originating in the retroantral fat.
Keywords: Solitary fibrous tumor, infratemporal fossa tumor, fibrous tumor, soft tissue tumor, head and neck, retroantral fat, extrapleural, CT, MRI
CASE REPORT
A 38-year-old male presented with a six-month history of slowly progressive right facial swelling. Physical examination demonstrated a firm lesion, the inferior margin of which could be palpated via a transoral approach. The patient had diminished facial sensory function to light touch in the right V2 distribution. Head and neck examination was otherwise normal with no other lesions and no enlarged lymph nodes.
Imaging Findings
CT scan of the paranasal sinuses with intravenous contrast demonstrated a 4.0 × 2.6 × 1.3 cm avidly enhancing, well- circumscribed lesion centered in the right retroantral fat extending caudally anterior to the superior alveolar ridge of the mandible. The lesion abutted the lateral wall of the right maxillary sinus resulting in bone remodeling without cortical erosion (Figure 1). No other lesions were identified.
Figure 1.
38-year-old male with solitary fibrous tumor of the retroantral fat on the right side.
FINDINGS: Axial CT scan with intravenous contrast, venous phase, at the level of the retroantral fat. (a) Soft tissue window: There is a well defined, oval shaped solid enhancing mass (asterisk) measuring 4.0 × 2.6 × 1.3 cm in the retroantral fat on the right. (b) Bone window: the lesion scallops the posterolateral wall (arrow) of the right maxillary sinus.
TECHNIQUE: Axial CT, a. KV 120, mAs 100, slice thickness 3 mm ww/wl 441/161. Contrast: Isovue 300, 100 ml with 65 second delay. b. KV 120, mAs 100, slice thickness 3 mm ww/wl 2118/690. Contrast: Isovue 300, 100 ml with 65 second delay.
On MRI, the lesion was well encapsulated and separate from the adjacent muscle. It was homogenously slightly hyperintense to muscle on T1 weighted (T1W) and T2 weighted (T2W) images and homogeneously enhanced on post-contrast images (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
38-year-old male with solitary fibrous tumor of the retroantral fat on the right side.
FINDINGS: On axial MR images at the level of the retroantral fat, there is a well-defined oval shaped solid mass (asterisks) measuring 4.0 × 2.6 × 1.3 cm in the retroantral fat on the right. The lesion is hyperintense to muscle on T2W (a), slightly hyperintense on T1W without contrast (b) and shows avid, homogeneous enhancement on T1W post contrast (c).
TECHNIQUE: Axial MRI, 1.5 tesla a. T2W: TR 4266, TE 98, slice thickness 4 mm, ww/wl 1612/829. b. T1W: TR 416, TE 14, slice thickness 4 mm ww/wl 1622/811. c. T1W + C 416, TE 14, slice thickness 4 mm ww/wl 2356/178. Contrast: 12 ml MultiHance.
The radiological features, particularly the bone remodeling on CT, suggested a non-aggressive entity and the differential primarily included a nerve sheath tumor in that location.
Management
Resection was performed via a transoral approach. Gross examination of the specimen demonstrated a well-encapsulated, firm mass measuring 3.8 × 2.8 × 1.4 cm and weighing 8.0 grams. Microscopically, the mass consisted of cytologically bland spindle cells arranged in a patternless architecture along with thin-walled blood vessels arranged in a stag-horn branching pattern (Figure 3). The cells were round and spindle-shaped with indistinct borders, rare mitoses, and were separated by thick collagen bands. The immunohistochemical staining profile of the tumor cells was strongly and diffusely positive for cluster of differentiation (CD) 34, B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), and CD99 and negative for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), keratin, and S100 protein. No calcifications were present. Both the morphologic and immunohistochemical features were consistent with a diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor.
Figure 3.
38-year-old male with solitary fibrous tumor of the retroantral fat on the right side.
FINDINGS: Histological examination (40x) with H&E stain revealed a solitary fibrous tumor consisting of spindle cells with a patternless architecture, thin-walled blood vessels, and collagen bands.
Follow-up
The patient recovered well from the surgery and his facial swelling gradually resolved. Follow-up CT at 6 months showed complete resection of the mass with no signs of recurrence. There was mild thickening of the right retroantral fat plane, which was likely postsurgical in nature (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
38-year-old male with solitary fibrous tumor of the retroantral fat on the right side.
FINDINGS: On six month postoperative axial CT with intravenous contrast at the level of the retroantral fat, the lesion has been completely resected with no evidence of recurrence. There is minimal stranding of the retro antral fat on the right (arrow), likely post surgical.
TECHNIQUE: Axial CT, KV 120, mAs 77, slice thickness 3 mm ww/wl 304/29. Contrast: Isovue 300, 100 ml.
DISCUSSION
Etiology and demographics
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are a rare group of mesenchymal tumors, suspected to be of fibroblastic origin. They are typically composed of bundles of spindle cells arranged in a patternless architecture with a background of collagen [1] and a dilated ‘staghorn’- like vascular network [2]. Some can show myxoid changes, fibrosis, hyalinization, necrosis, or focal calcifications [3]. SFTs usually stain positive for CD34 (95%) and CD99 (70%) [2,4]. They may be positive for BCL2, EMA and smooth muscle actin (SMA) (~30%) [2,4,5]. They are usually negative for keratin and desmin.
SFTs can occur in any site, but most commonly occur in subcutaneous tissue (40%)[2]. A study conducted by Demicco et al of 110 cases found about 32% to be in the abdomen/pelvis, 32% to be pleural, 16% in the extremities, 12% in the trunk, and 12% in the head and neck. SFTs tend to occur in adults aged 20–70 and equally in males and females [2]. They are very rare in children [3].
Clinical findings
Presenting symptoms depend on the location. Soft tissue SFTs present with a slowly enlarging painless mass [2–3]. Head and neck SFTs may also present with obstructive symptoms, headaches, epistaxis, or rhinorrhea [6]. Two paraneoplastic syndromes have been reported: hypoglycemia due to production of an insulin-like growth factor (Doege- Potter syndrome) or hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, neither of which was present in our patient.
The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies SFTs as intermediate risk for aggressive behavior. The behavior is usually benign but can be difficult to predict [1]. The percentage of SFTs that are found to be malignant varies in the literature, with most studies reporting ranges from 5 to 26% of cases [2–3, 7]. Most metastases are to the lung, followed by the bone and liver. Malignancy potential increases with the presence of necrosis, 4 or more mitotic figures per 10 high power fields, increased cellularity, and cellular polymorphism [3]. Increased tumor size (greater than 10cm), the presence of hemorrhage, infiltrative margins, and the presence of anaplastic foci also point to malignancy. Local recurrence after resection can also occur, with reported rates of around 6% in solitary disease and around 23% in malignant disease [3].
Imaging findings
On imaging studies, SFTs typically have a non-aggressive appearance irrespective of the location. On CT imaging, soft tissue SFTs frequently appear as a well-defined hyperdense to isodense avidly enhancing mass [7–9]. Calcifications may be present in as many as 10% of cases [3]. Bone erosion may be present [10]. Hemorrhage and central necrosis may be visible in larger lesions. On MRI, SFTs can be isointense [9] or slightly hyperintense [11] to skeletal muscle on T1W and T2W images. The mass enhances avidly post-contrast. Enhancement pattern is prominent [12] and may be homogenous, heterogeneous or patchy [3,9,11]. Intralesional cystic areas and cystic degeneration have been reported [9]. SFTs do not typically show restricted diffusion. [12] On ultrasound, the expected finding is a homogenous hypoechoic or mostly hypoechoic mass with heterogeneous components [13]. A vascular pedicle may be seen as well [10]. On positron emission tomography (PET), SFT shows increased metabolic activity [10]. Therefore, PET can be helpful when multiple lesions are suspected.
Differential Diagnosis
The lesion in our patient had the classic CT and MRI features described for SFT and this entity should have been considered in the differential. Other tumors on the differential based on the non-aggressive appearance included neurofibroma, nerve sheath tumor, and leiomyoma, although these each have distinct imaging features when considering multiple modalities (Table 2) [13–17].
Table 2.
Presentation and imaging of the most important differential diagnoses for extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)
| US | CT | MRI – T1, T2, DWI | Enhancement Pattern | FDG PET | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Schwannoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neurofibroma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Leiomyoma (superficial) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schwannomas tend to be well circumscribed and demonstrate intermediate to high signal on T2W and intermediate signal on T1W [13]. They are diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) negative like SFTs, and exhibit homogenous enhancement in small lesions. On CT, schwannomas appear as ovoid to fusiform hypodense masses. Larger schwannomas with cystic change demonstrate nonenhancing areas (Figure 5). On ultrasound, they are homogenous and hypoechoic with posterior acoustic enhancement with peripheral nerve continuity. They are often positive on PET scan [14].
Figure 5.
49-year-old female with right parapharyngeal space schwannoma. Patient presented with an enlarging right neck mass. On axial CT post-contrast soft tissue window (a), the lesion is hypodense with central necrotic areas (asterisk) as is characteristic of large schwannomas. On axial T2W image (b) the lesion is hyperintense with high signal central areas of necrosis (asterisk.) A coronal T1W image (c) shows the lesion to be isointense to skeletal muscle with areas of necrosis (asterisk). On the post-contrast T1W image (d), the lesion enhances heterogeneously with the necrotic areas not enhancing (asterisk). Note the superior extent of the lesion to the foramen ovale. Technique: a. Axial CT scan with contrast, soft tissue window, KV 140, mAs 140, slice thickness 3mm ww/wl 196/53. Contrast: Isovue 300, 100 ml with 65 second delay. b. Axial T2W MRI, 1.5 Tesla, TR 4910, TE 113, slice thickness 5 mm, ww/wl 1011/504. c. Coronal T1W MRI, SE without contrast, slice thickness 3mm, TR 611, TE 18, ww/wl 852/471. d. Coronal T1W FS post-contrast, slice thickness 3mm, TR 568, TE 118, ww/wl 1242/708. Contrast: 12 mL MultiHance.
Neurofibromas, like SFTs, can be isointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W, although the hyperintensity tends to be darker centrally, leading to a “target” sign [13]. They are DWI negative. On CT, neurofibromas are hypodense, unlike SFTs. On ultrasound, they are hypoechoic and homogenous, with posterior acoustic enhancement and peripheral nerve continuity. They are often positive on PET scan [15].
Leiomyomas, albeit exceedingly rare in the head and neck region, are on the differential as they have a similar appearance to SFTs. On MRI, they are isointense to hyperintense on T1W and homogenous to heterogeneous hyperintense to muscle on T2W. They are DWI negative and well defined, often with calcifications. On CT, they show increased density and show prominent contrast enhancement. On ultrasound, they are hypoechoic if uncomplicated [16]. On PET scan, leiomyomas are often positive [17].
Treatment & prognosis
Most SFTs are surgically removed in order to end compressive symptoms and to establish a histological diagnosis. Conservative therapy for asymptomatic SFTs may yield to surgery as the tumor grows and becomes symptomatic; long-term follow-up is mandatory since 10–15% tend to behave in a locally aggressive fashion [2]. Adjuvant chemotherapy is rarely successful, and SFTs are regarded as chemoresistant [3]. Even with treatment, local and distant relapses can occur more than 20 years later. Resection with clear margins yields the best chance for curing SFTs with or without malignant features [7]. Radiotherapy can be considered if tumor displays evident criteria for malignancy or if the surgical margins were positive [7].
In summary, an adult presenting with a well circumscribed, avidly enhancing mass that is iso- to hyperintense compared to skeletal muscle on T1W and T2W MRI images in the head and neck should prompt a consideration of SFT. While most SFTs are benign, surgical resection is advised as these tumors continue to grow, can be locally invasive, and have the potential to be malignant.
TEACHING POINT
SFTs are uncommon soft tissue lesions in the head and neck that present as a well-defined solid, enhancing mass that is iso- to hyperintense compared to skeletal muscle on T1W and T2W MRI images. Surgical resection with wide margins is the treatment of choice as these tumors continue to grow, can be locally invasive, and have the potential to be malignant.
Table 1.
Summary table of clinical and imaging findings in patients with extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)
| Etiology | Mesenchymal tumor of probable fibroblastic type |
| Incidence | Rare; 1–2% of soft tissue tumors are SFTs, of which 12–15% are in the head and neck. |
| Gender ratio | 1:1 |
| Age Predilection | 20 to 70 years; median age 45–50. Occasionally in children and adolescents. |
| Risk Factors | No known risk factors |
| Treatment | En-bloc resection. |
| Prognosis | Local recurrence after surgical removal: 0–6%. Malignant transformation with metastatic disease: 5–26%, most commonly to lungs, bone and liver. 5-year survival 89–100%. |
| Findings on Imaging | CT: hyperdense/isodense, avid enhancement MRI: T1W: isointense/hyperintense to skeletal muscle. T2W: isointense/hyperintense to skeletal muscle. Avid enhancement. |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Dr. Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, M.D. and Dr. Andrew E. Rosenberg, M.D., both at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, for expert pathology consultation.
ABBREVIATIONS
- CT
Computed Tomography
- DWI
Diffusion Weighted Imaging
- MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- SFT
Solitary Fibrous Tumor
- TE
Echo Time
- TR
Repetition Time
- T1W
T1 Weighted
- T2W
T2 Weighted
- WHO
World Health Organization
REFERENCES
- 1.Demicco EG, Park MS, Araujo DM, Fox PS, Bassett RL, Pollock RE, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model. Modern pathology: an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2012 Sep;25(9):1298–306. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. IARC Press; Lyon: 2002. [Accessed August 1, 2013]. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/patgen/bb5/BB5.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Penel N, Amela EY, Decanter G, Robin YM, Marec-Berard P. Solitary fibrous tumors and so-called hemangiopericytoma. Sarcoma. 2012;2012:690251. doi: 10.1155/2012/690251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pernick N. CD Markers. PathologyOutlines.com. [Accessed September 10, 2013]. Available at: www.pathologyoutlines.com/cdmarkers.html.
- 5.Martorell M, Perez-Valles A, Gozalbo F, Garcia-Garcia JA, Gutierrez J, Gaona J. Solitary fibrous tumor of the thigh with epithelioid features: a case report. Diagnostic pathology. 2007;2:19. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-2-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thompson L, Wenig BM, Nelson BL, Müller S, Gannon FH, Torske KR, et al. Diagnostic Pathology: Head and Neck. Amirsys Publishing Inc; Canada: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bowe SN, Wakely PE, Jr, Ozer E. Head and neck solitary fibrous tumors: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Laryngoscope. 2012 Apr 11; doi: 10.1002/lary.23350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fargen KM, Opalach KJ, Wakefield D, Jacob RP, Yachnis AT, Lister JR. The central nervous system solitary fibrous tumor: A review of clinical, imaging and pathologic findings among all reported cases from 1996 to 2010. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2011 Nov;113(9):703–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chourmouzi D, Potsi S, Moumtzouoglou A, Papadopoulou E, Drevelegas K, Zaraboukas T, et al. Dural lesions mimicking meningiomas: A pictorial essay. World journal of radiology. 2012 Mar 28;4(3):75–82. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i3.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ginat DT, Bokhari A, Bhatt S, Dogra V. Imaging Features of Solitary Fibrous Tumors. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;196:487–495. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garcia-Bennett J, Olivé CS, Rivas A, Domínguez - Oronox R, Huguet P. Soft tissue solitary fibrous tumor. Imaging findings in a series of nine cases. J of Skeletal Radiology. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1364-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clarençon F, Bonneville F, Rousseau A, Galanaud D, Kujas M, Naggara O, Cornu P, Chiras J. Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):387–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reynolds DL, Jr, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, Jamadar DA, Ebrahim FS, Hayes CW. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2004 Mar;182(3):741–4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beaulieu S, Rubin B, Djang D, Conrad E, Turcotte E, Eary JF. Positron emission tomography of schwannomas: emphasizing its potential in preoperative planning. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2004 Apr;182(4):971–4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Son JM, Ahn MI, Cho KD, Yoo J, Park YH. Varying degrees of FDG uptake in multiple benign neurofibromas on PET/CT. The British journal of radiology. 2007 Sep;80(957):e222–6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/31510627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, Enzinger FM. Enzinger and Weiss’ s Soft Tissue Tumors. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. Chapter 18 Benign Tumors of Smooth Muscle; pp. 522–8. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chura JC, Truskinovsky AM, Judson PL, Johnson L, Geller MA, Downs LS., Jr Positron emission tomography and leiomyomas: clinicopathologic analysis of 3 cases of PET scan-positive leiomyomas and literature review. Gynecologic oncology. 2007 Jan;104(1):247–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





