Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for most lung cancer. To develop new therapy required the elucidation of NSCLC pathogenesis. The deubiquitinating enzymes USP 28 has been identified and studied in colon and breast carcinomas. However, the role of USP28 in NSCLC is unknown. The level mRNA or protein level of USP28 were measured by qRT-PCR or immunohistochemistry (IHC). The role of USP28 in patient survival was revealed by Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival in NSCLC patients. USP28 was up or down regulated by overexpression plasmid or siRNA transfection. Cell proliferation and apoptosis was assayed by MTT and FACS separately. Potential microRNAs, which targeted USP28, were predicated by bioinformatic algorithm and confirmed by Dual Luciferase reporter assay system. High mRNA and protein level of USP28 in NSCLC were both correlated with low patient survival rate. Overexpression of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells growth and vice versa. Down-regulation of USP28 induced cell apoptosis. USP28 was targeted by miR-4295. Overexpression of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells proliferation, and was associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients. The expression of USP28 may be regulated by miR-4295. Our data suggested that USP28 was a tumour-promoting factor and a promising therapeutic target for NSCLC.
Keywords: USP28, NSCLC, prognosis, miR-4295
Introduction
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is thought to originate in lung epithelial cells, and comprises diverse histological subtypes including adenocarcinoma, bronchioloalveolar, squamous, anaplastic and large-cell carcinomas 1. NSCLC accounts for most lung cancer 2,3. Lung cancer incidence has peaked and declined in several region of the world but has yet to peak in many other parts of the world, particularly China 4. During the past 30 years, China has experienced a dramatic increase in the cigarette consuming, and the mortality of lung cancer has increased by 465% during the past 30 years. Most patients with advance NSCLC present with metastatic disease and, if left untreated, have a median survival after diagnosis of 4–5 months and a 1-year survival of less than 10% 5. Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy results in a modest increase in survival at the cost of significant toxicity to the patients 6,7. To develop new therapy required the elucidation of NSCLC pathogenesis.
The function of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) to control substrate activity and/or abundance by removing covalently attached ubiquitin from proteins 8. The USP family in DUBs plays an important role in cellular processes and signalling pathways 9–15. High expression of USP28 was found in colon and breast carcinomas. More importantly, USP28 controls MYC stability through antagonizing the activity of the SCFFBW7 ubiquitin liagse complex, and that the stabilization of MYC by USP28 is required for proliferation of several tumour cells types and for inhibition of cell differentiation in colon carcinoma, however, the role of USP28 in lung cancer has not yet been determined 16. Here, we focused the role of USP28 in NSCLC, and tried to elucidate the involved mechanism.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) inhibited mRNA translation or induce mRNA degradation in general by binding to the 3′untranslation region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs 17. Accumulating data showed that specific miRNAs were involved in early-stage NSCLC 18–22. We wondered, in NSCLC, USP28 could be targeted by some miRNAs.
Here, we studied the role of USP28 in NSCLC, and searched potential miRNAs which targeted USP28. We hoped our study might promote the elucidation the pathogenesis of NSCLC and provide potential therapy targets for further investigation.
Materials and methods
Patients
Surgical specimens from 70 NSCLC patients and matched normal control adjacent normal tissues were obtained postoperatively in 2009 from the Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, School of Medicine. Tissues were obtained before chemotherapy and radiotherapy and were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C prior to qRT-PCR assay. Informed consent was obtained from each patient and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. All diagnoses were based on pathological and/or cytological evidence.
Cell culture
Human normal lung fibroblast cell line MRC-5, and human NSCLC cell lines (SPC-A-1, LTEP-A-2, SK-MES-1, A549 and H1299), HEK293 comes from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). These cell lines were maintained in RPMI1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the presence of 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 ug/ml streptomycin in a humidified 5% (v/v) atmosphere of CO2 at 37°C.
RNA extraction and real-time q-PCR
RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA synthesis and real-time qPCR were subsequently performed with the Qiagen system as described detail in previous studies 23. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis was performed with standard protocols on an Applied Biosystem's (Burnsville, Minnesota, United States) 7500 HT sequence Detection System. MiR-4295 expression was assessed using a mirVana™ qRT-PCR miRNA Detection Kit (Ambion, Austin, Texas, USA). The primers were designed and synthesized by Shengong Company (Shanghai, China). Relative mRNA levels of USP28 were normalized to levels of the housekeeping gene GAPDH and calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primers used are as follows: GAPDH (5′-CCATGTTCGTCATGGG-TGTGAACCA-3′ and 5′-GCCAGTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTG-3′) and USP28 (5′-ATCTTCAGGCTGCCATTGCT-3′ and 5′-CTAGCTGGAATGCGTCCTCT-3′).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was described previously 24. Briefly, 4-μm thick sections were cut and anti-USP28 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA)) was applied. Subsequent counterstaining was performed with haematoxylin. Immunostaining results for USP28 were evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system as described previously 25, which calculated the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells. IHC staining was scored according to the following criteria: −, 0–10% of the nucleated cells stained, +, 10–40% stained, ++; 40–70% stained and +++, 70–100% stained. USP28 expression was considered to be observed when score≧ +. Alternatively, IHC score of USP28 expression was (− ∼ +) and (++ ∼ +++), which represented low and high expression, respectively.
USP28 overexpression plasmid, siRNA, miRNAs and cells transfection
USP28 overexpression plasmid (pcDNA3.1-USP28), siRNA and control were designed and constructed by Santa Cruz Biotechnology Delaware Ave Santa Cruz, CA. 95060, USA. miR-NC, miR-16, miR-4295, miR-363-3p, miR-301a, miR-301b, miR-453, miR-3066, miR-130a and miR-130b were constructed by Shengong Company. Transfections were performed with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
MicroRNAs prediction
TargetScanHuman (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_61/) 26–29 is applied to identify which miRNAs target USP28.
MTT assay
For MTT assay, 5 × 103 cells per well were seeded in triplicate in a 96-well plate with complete growth medium. Cells were counted over 5 days using the MTT assay (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) as described previously 30–32. The data were measured by Microtiter plate reader 570-nm filters (Promega).
Apoptosis assay
Cells were labelled with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) using an apoptosis detecting kit (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada) following the manufacturer's instructions. Then sample were analysed by FACS assays (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) 33.
USP28 3′UTR reporter analysis
The 3′UTR reporter plasmids (RL-USP28) were constructed by Shengong Company. Mutation in the miR-4295 seed regions of the USP28 3′UTR were generated using QuikChang Multi site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). RL reporter plasmids (3.6 fmol) and pGL3-control (500 ng for normalization; Promega) were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) into HEK293 cell (6 × 104 cells per well). These Cells were collected after 48 hrs for assay using the Dual Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) 34.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. The difference between groups was analysed using two-tailed Student's t-test when only two groups were compared. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the expression of USP28 between matched pairs. The difference between groups was analysed using anova when three or more than three groups were compared. Correlation analysis was performed by two-tailed Person's correlation coefficient analysis. Patient survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Statistical analyses were performed with Statistics Package for Social Science, (SPSS), Armonk, NY, USA, (version 17.0). P < 0.05 was considered significantly different.
Results
High mRNA level of USP28 in NSCLC reduced patients survival
We firstly assayed USP28 level in NSCLC cell lines, and found that NSCLC cell lines (A549, H1299, SPC-A-1, LTEP-A-2 and SK-MES-1) showed a high USP28 (Fig.1A). And then USP28 level in 22 NSCLC tissues was assayed by qRT-PCR. We found that the mean expression of USP28 in NSCLC tissues was higher than control (Fig.1B). In the 22 NSCLC specimens, there were 17 case with higher USP28 expression in tumour tissues (Fig.1C). Next, we investigated the relationship between USP28 expression and patient survival and found high USP28 expression was correlated with low patient survival rate, and the mean value of all 70 NSCLC tissues was chosen as the cut-off point for separating USP28 high expression (n = 53) from USP28 low expression cases (n = 17; Fig.1D).
High protein level of USP28 in NSCLC reduced patients' survival
To further investigate the role of USP28, we assayed USP28 protein expression in NSCLC tissues by IHC. We found that NSCLC tissues showed higher USP28 protein levels than adjacent normal tissues (Fig.2A). Next the USP28 protein expressions were scored according to the criteria mentioned in Materials and Methods part. We found in the majority NSCLC tissues, USP28 expression were higher (Fig.2B). Similarly, we investigated the relationship between USP28 protein expression and patient survival and found high USP28 protein expressions were correlated with low patient survival rate (Fig.2C).
Up-regulation of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells proliferation
Next we up-regulated the USP28 expression by plasmid transfection, and found that 48 h after transfection, the USP28 expression were higher than control in A549 and H1299 (Fig.3A). Then cells proliferation was assayed by MTT. We found that up-regulation of USP28 in NSCLC cell lines promoted cells proliferation (Fig.3B).
Down-regulation of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells proliferation and induced cells apoptosis
Then we down-regulated the USP28 expression by siRNA (si-USP28). 48 hrs after siRNA transfection, The USP28 expression was significantly down-regulated (Fig.4A). As expected, MTT assay showed that both two siRNAs reduced A549 and H1299 cells proliferation (Fig.4B). Moreover, FACS apoptosis analysis indicated that down-regulation of USP28 expression by siRNA increased the NSCLC cells apoptosis rate (Fig.4C).
USP28 was targeted by miR-4295
Next, we tried to find which miRNAs targeted USP28. Bioinformatics algorithms were applied to predicate the potential miRNAs. Based on their potential relevance to NSCLC and novelty, parts of predicated miRNAs were chosen and shown in Figure5A. Next the 3′UTR of the USP28 were cloned into luciferase reporter plasmids. 9 miRNAs and the reporter plasmids were cotransfected into HEK293 cells. We found that miR-4295 reduced the luciferase activity mostly (Fig.5B). To confirm the role of miR-4295, we mutated USP28 3′UTR as Figure5C indicated. Mutated USP28 3′UTR was cloned into luciferase reporter plasmids, and then miR-4295 and reporter plasmids with mutated USP28 3′UTR were cotransfected into HEK293 cells. We found that miR-4295 did not reduce the luciferase activity when transfected with mutated USP28 3′UTR (Fig.5D). Thus, our data indicated that USP28 was targeted by miR-4295.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated the role of USP28 in NSCLC. Significantly, we proved that high USP28 expression in mRNA level and protein level were both correlated with low patient survival rate. Thus, USP28 expression in NSCLC may be treated as a predictor for the prognosis of NSCLC. We also found that up-regulation of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells proliferation and vice versa. Our data showed that USP28 on proliferation and apoptosis were rather minor (4–8% change maybe). It is surprising that these minor influences could cause an effect on patient survival. We guessed that Although USP28 on proliferation and apoptosis were rather minor, cell proliferated exponentially in vivo. Thus, minor USP28 difference caused an effect on patients survival during a long time (30 months).
Previous study demonstrated that depletion of USP28 inhibited both cell-cycle and cell growth through regulation of MYC abundance 16. Another study revealed that in NSCLC, overexpression of USP14 promoted cells growth through the accumulation of β-Catenin 35. USP28 was also involved in DNA-damage-induced ubiquitination and deubiquitination as the major regulator of the DNA-damage response for Chk, 53BP1 and a number of other proteins in the DNA-damage checkpoint pathway, including several mediators, such as Mdc1, Claspin and TopBP1 36. It seemed USP28 was involved in multiple-pathway. Which pathway USP28 exploited in NSCLC needed further investigation. In the next study, we will compare the gene profiles between NSCLC cell lines before and after USP28 up- or down-regulation.
Besides, we proved that in A549 and H1299, up-regulation of USP28 promoted NSCLC cells proliferation. Interestingly, A549 expressed wild-type p53 and H1299 was p53-deficient. Previous study indicated that USP28 regulated Chk2-p53-PUMA pathway, which is a major regulator of DNA-damage-induced apoptosis 36.
Our data indicated that miR-4295 may have targeted USP28 in NSCLC. This may be the first report about miR-4295 in NSCLC. We guessed that the level of miR4295 was related with the survival of NSCLC patients. We will investigate the role of miR4295 in further study.
In conclusion, our data indicated that high expression of USP28 in NSCLC promoted tumour cells proliferation, and miR-4295 may target USP28. Our study is a precursor study of USP28 and miR-4295, and may provide a potential target for further study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- Brambilla E, Travis WD, Colby TV, et al. The new World Health Organization classification of lung tumours. Eur Respir J. 2001;18:1059–68. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00275301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wakelee HA, Chang ET, Gomez SL, et al. Lung cancer incidence in never smokers. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:472–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.2983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujii T, Dracheva T, Player A, et al. A preliminary transcriptome map of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3340–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:584–94. doi: 10.4065/83.5.584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:169–81. doi: 10.1038/nrc2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rapp E, Pater JL, Willan A, et al. Chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer–report of a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:633–41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goulart BH, Martins RG, Lynch TJ. Twenty-two years of phase III trials for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sobering results. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4089. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, et al. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell. 2009;138:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee BH, Lee MJ, Park S, et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature. 2010;467:179–84. doi: 10.1038/nature09299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson C, Crimmins S, Wilson JA, et al. Loss of Usp14 results in reduced levels of ubiquitin in ataxia mice. J Neurochem. 2005;95:724–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nag DK, Finley D. A small-molecule inhibitor of deubiquitinating enzyme USP14 inhibits Dengue virus replication. Virus Res. 2012;165:103–6. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peth A, Besche HC, Goldberg AL. Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasome by binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which causes 20S gate opening. Mol Cell. 2009;36:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mines MA, Goodwin JS, Limbird LE, et al. Deubiquitination of CXCR4 by USP14 is critical for both CXCL12-induced CXCR4 degradation and chemotaxis but not ERK ativation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:5742–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808507200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson SM, Bhattacharyya B, Rachel RA, et al. Synaptic defects in ataxia mice result from a mutation in Usp14, encoding a ubiquitin-specific protease. Nat Genet. 2002;32:420–5. doi: 10.1038/ng1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borodovsky A, Kessler BM, Casagrande R, et al. A novel active site-directed probe specific for deubiquitylating enzymes reveals proteasome association of USP14. EMBO J. 2001;20:5187–96. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popov N, Wanzel M, Madiredjo M, et al. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP28 is required for MYC stability. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:765–74. doi: 10.1038/ncb1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–5. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanaihara N, Caplen N, Bowman E, et al. Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:189–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu SL, Chen HY, Chang GC, et al. MicroRNA signature predicts survival and relapse in lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raponi M, Dossey L, Jatkoe T, et al. MicroRNA classifiers for predicting prognosis of squamous cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5776–83. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seike M, Goto A, Okano T, et al. MiR-21 is an EGFR-regulated anti-apoptotic factor in lung cancer in never-smokers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:12085–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905234106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patnaik SK, Kannisto E, Knudsen S, et al. Evaluation of microRNA expression profiles that may predict recurrence of localized stage I non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection. Cancer Res. 2010;70:36–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou J, Lin L, Zhou W, et al. Identification of miRNomes in human liver and hepatocellular carcinoma reveals miR-199a/b-3p as therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:232–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu XS, Wang L, Abrams J, et al. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) in XPC gene silencing and bladder cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-4-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lv T, Yuan D, Miao X, et al. Over-expression of LSD1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, et al. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19:92–105. doi: 10.1101/gr.082701.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, et al. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia DM, Baek D, Shin C, et al. Weak seed-pairing stability and high target-site abundance decrease the proficiency of lsy-6 and other microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1139–46. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Meerloo J, Kaspers GJ, Cloos J. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;731:237–45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D, Liu X, Lin L, et al. MicroRNA-99a inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth and correlates with prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:36677–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.270561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han ZB, Yang Z, Chi Y, et al. MicroRNA-124 suppresses breast cancer cell growth and motility by targeting CD151. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;31:823–32. doi: 10.1159/000350100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu J, Wen M, Huang Y, et al. C2ORF40 suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion through modulating expression of M phase cell cycle genes. Epigenetics. 2013;8:571–83. doi: 10.4161/epi.24626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grentzmann G, Ingram JA, Kelly PJ, et al. A dual-luciferase reporter system for studying recoding signals. RNA. 1998;4:479–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu N, Liu C, Bai C, et al. Over-expression of deubiquitinating enzyme USP14 in lung adenocarcinoma promotes proliferation through the accumulation of beta-catenin. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:10749–60. doi: 10.3390/ijms140610749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D, Zaugg K, Mak TW, et al. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell. 2006;126:529–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]