Abstract
Microsporidia comprise a highly diverged phylum of intracellular, eukaryotic pathogens, with some species able to cause life-threatening illnesses in immunocompromised patients. To better understand microsporidian infection in animals, we study infection of the genetic model organism Caenorhabditis elegans and a species of microsporidia, Nematocida parisii, which infects Caenorhabditis nematodes in the wild. We conducted a targeted RNAi screen for host C. elegans genes important for infection and growth of N. parisii, using nematode larval arrest as an assay for infection. Here, we present the results of this RNAi screen, and our analyses on one of the RNAi hits from the screen that was ultimately not corroborated by loss of function mutants. This hit was an RNAi clone against F56A8.3, a conserved gene that encodes a transmembrane protein containing leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), a domain found in numerous pathogen receptors from other systems. This RNAi clone caused C. elegans to be resistant to infection by N. parisii, leading to reduced larval arrest and lower pathogen load. Characterization of the endogenous F56A8.3 protein revealed that it is expressed in the intestine, localized to the membrane around lysosome-related organelles (LROs), and exists in two different protein isoforms in C. elegans. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit the F56A8.3 locus and created both a frameshift mutant resulting in a truncated protein and a complete knockout mutant. Neither of these mutants was able to recapitulate the infection phenotypes of the RNAi clone, indicating that the RNAi-mediated phenotypes are due to an off-target effect of the RNAi clone. Nevertheless, this study describes microsporidia-induced developmental arrest in C. elegans, presents results from an RNAi screen for host genes important for microsporidian infection, and characterizes aspects of the conserved F56A8.3 gene and its protein product.
Introduction
Microsporidia represent a large phylum of obligate intracellular pathogens that are related to fungi, with significantly reduced genomes compared to true fungi and other eukaryotes [1–4]. There are 14 species of microsporidia that can infect humans, and this can lead to an invasive infection that is sometimes lethal when host immunity has declined, as in patients with AIDS or those on immunosuppressant therapy [5]. Microsporidia can also be isolated from asymptomatic immunocompetent people, with reports finding up to 56% of this population shedding microsporidian spores [6]. Most species found in humans infect the intestine, including Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, and Encephalitozoon intestinalis [7]. Very little is known about microsporidian mechanisms of pathogenesis due to the difficulties of culturing these microbes.
We use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a convenient, whole-animal system to study microsporidian infection. In its natural environment, Caenorhabditis nematodes are regularly infected by microsporidia, and we focus on a microsporidian species isolated from wild-caught C. elegans found in a compost pit near Paris [8–10]. This organism, named Nematocida parisii, infects C. elegans intestinal cells where it undergoes extensive replication that eventually leads to death of the host. Due to the many genetic tools available in C. elegans, we use N. parisii infection of C. elegans as a model for discovery-based genetic screens to find host genes important for microsporidian infection and progression.
Here, we present the results of a screen for host genes important for infection. We also present our analysis of the gene corresponding to an RNAi hit from the screen that was ultimately not corroborated by loss of function mutations in that gene. This screen involved searching for C. elegans RNAi clones that block infection, measured as a reduction in the severity of N. parisii-induced larval arrest. We chose to focus on one RNAi clone discovered in this screen based on its robust and specific inhibition of infection-induced larval arrest, and the identity of its target gene, F56A8.3, which encodes a predicted transmembrane domain protein with leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), which are found in many pathogen receptors. We found that feeding C. elegans the F56A8.3 RNAi clone resulted in lower N. parisii pathogen load at various stages of infection, and that endogenous F56A8.3 protein localized to the membranes around lysosome-related organelles (LROs). However, after mutating F56A8.3 using targeted genome editing with the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we found that mutations in F56A8.3 did not recapitulate the infection phenotypes of the RNAi clone, indicating that these phenotypes are due to an off-target effect of the clone. The results described here provide new information about a microsporidian infection-induced phenotype in C. elegans, and the characterization of a LRR protein in C. elegans that shows conservation in other animals.
Materials and Methods
C. elegans and N. parisii culture conditions
All C. elegans strains were maintained on nematode growth media (NGM) and fed with E. coli strain OP50-1, as described [11]. N. parisii spores were prepared as previously described [12]. Briefly, N. parisii isolate ERTm1 was cultured by infecting large-scale cultures of C. elegans, followed by mechanical disruption of the nematodes and then filtering to isolate spores away from animal debris. The RNAi-sensitive sterile strain GR1373 eri-1(mg366) was used for the larval arrest screen and subsequent RNAi experiments [13]. The tissue-specific RNAi strains MGH167 sid-1(qt9); alxIs9 [VHA-6p::SID-1::SL2::GFP] and SPC272 sid-1(qt9); Is[myo-3::sid-1] were kind gifts from Drs. Gary Ruvkun, Justine Melo, Sean Curran, Antony Jose, and Alex Soukas [14, 15], WU1236 cdf-2(tm788); amIs4[cdf-2::GFP::unc-119(+))] was a kind gift from Dr. Kerry Kornfeld, and GH351 glo-3(zu446) X; kxEx41[glo-3p::glo-3::GFP; rol-6] was a kind gift from Greg Herman [16, 17]. Two F56A8.3 promoter strains ERT173 jyEx77[pF56A8.3a::mCherry::unc54 3’UTR] and ERT174 jyEx78[pF56A8.3a::mCherry::unc54 3’UTR] were generated for this study (see cloning details below). F56A8.3 mutant strains ERT327 F56A8.3(jy4) and ERT425 F56A8.3(jy8[LoxP Prps-0::HygR-CeOpt::gpd-2::GFP::unc-54 3’UTR LoxP) were generated by CRISPR-Cas9 and backcrossed three times to N2, and these strains were crossed to GR1373 eri-1(mg366) to make ERT360 F56A8.3(jy4); eri-1(mg366) and ERT430 F56A8.3(jy8[LoxP Prps-0::HygR-CeOpt::gpd-2::GFP::unc-54 3’UTR LoxP); eri-1(mg366), respectively.
Larval arrest experiments
For the larval arrest screen, cherry-picked RNAi libraries derived from the C. elegans Ahringer feeding RNAi library were used, which included approximately 345 RNAi clones for predicted transcription factors and 91 RNAi clones for LRR genes [18]. Conditions for the screen were modified from published procedures [19]. Specifically, RNAi clones were amplified and plated on RNAi plates (6-well format) in duplicate overnight at 25°C. Five synchronized L1 eri-1 animals were hand-picked onto each RNAi clone and grown for 65–66 hours at 20°C until hundreds of F1 generation L1s and eggs were observed. Wells were infected with N. parisii spores at 5.5 x 106 spores in 200 μl M9 per well and shifted to 25°C, which causes sterility in eri-1 mutants and prevents further reproduction. At 2 days post-infection (dpi), the infected F1 generation animals in each well were visually scored together by overall size on a 1–4 scale. Completely unarrested animals that reached the young adult stage were scored as a 4, similar to uninfected eri-1 grown on L4440 (control RNAi). Wells with partially arrested animals where the majority of animals reached the L4 larval stage were scored as a 3. Wells with more severely arrested animals, with the majority of animals in the L2 or L3 larval stage were scored as a 2. Fully arrested wells where the majority of animals were still at the L1 larval stage were scored as a 1. Because eri-1 mutants are sterile at 25°C, there were no F2 generation animals to affect the assay. Larval arrest assays performed on hits involved scoring 100 animals per replicate (conducted in triplicate per experiment) that reached the L4 or adult stage at 2 or 3 dpi, respectively, using strains eri-1, MGH167, SPC272, ERT360, and ERT430.
For larval arrest experiments on P. aeruginosa (PA14), synchronized eri-1 mutants were grown for one generation on RNAi from L1 to adulthood, and then bleached to obtain F1 eggs. SK plates were seeded with 20 μL of overnight cultures of PA14 and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by 25°C for 24 hours. A total of 100 RNAi-treated F1 eggs obtained from bleach were plated in duplicate on PA14 plates at 25°C, and the number of hatched animals reaching the L4 stage at 2 dpi was recorded.
Pathogen load measurement
For pathogen load measurements by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), eri-1 mutants were treated with RNAi for two generations. Specifically, gravid eri-1 adults were bleached to obtain starved L1s. These synchronized P0 L1s were then grown to gravid adults on RNAi bacteria and bleached again to obtain synchronized F1 progeny, which were plated on fresh RNAi bacteria. These F1 L1 progeny were infected with a two-fold serial dilution of N. parisii starting at 5.76 x 106 spores per 10 cm plate at 25°C. At 30 hours post infection (hpi), animals were harvested and RNA was isolated by extraction with Tri-Reagent and bromochloropropane (BCP) (Molecular Research Center). cDNA was synthesized from 250–500 ng of RNA with the RETROscript kit (Ambion) and quantified with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX Connect Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Pathogen load was measured as the relative abundance of an N. parisii ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcript normalized to a C. elegans rDNA transcript with the following primer sets: Np_rDNAF1: aaaaggcaccaggttgattc, Np_rDNAR1: agctctctgacgcttccttc, Ce18S_F1: ttgcgtacggctcattagag, Ce18S_R1: agctccagtatttccgcagt. Primer efficiencies were measured, and fold difference was calculated with using the Pfaffl method [20].
For pathogen load measurement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments were performed essentially as described [21]. Specifically, eri-1 animals were treated on duplicate plates with RNAi as above, but F1 progeny were grown for 24 hrs at 20°C before infection with 2.9 x 106 spores per 10 cm plate for 8 hours at 25°C. Harvested animals were fixed in 1 mL acetone at -20°C overnight (ON), washed with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T), and stained with MicroB FISH probe against N. parisii rRNA as previously described [1, 9]. Stained samples were blinded and mounted on glass slides in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories). FISH stained parasite sporoplasms, an early, single nucleated stage of the parasite, were counted in 16–24 animals per sample using a Zeiss AxioImager microscope with a 10X objective.
The spore production assay was performed as described with modifications [22]. Synchronized eri-1 L1s were plated on 6 cm RNAi plates with RNAi bacteria in triplicate and grown 24 hours at 20°C, then transferred to fresh RNAi culture plates containing 2.0 x 106 spores and infected at 25°C for 40 hours, with a transfer to a fresh RNAi plate at 24 hpi to prevent starvation. Animals were fixed in 1 mL acetone at -20°C ON, washed with PBS-T, and loaded onto the COPAS Biosort (Union Biometrica) to dispense 50 animals per well of a 96-well plate. Animals in each well were lysed and stained ON in 100 μL PBS with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1% 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME), 1 mg/mL direct yellow 96. The number of spores was counted twice per sample on a hemocytometer with the AxioImager microscope at 10X. After COPAS Biosort dispensing of animals into wells, each well was spot-counted to verify the number of animals per well, and this number was used in the final calculation of spores produced per animal.
Generation of transgenic C. elegans strains
The F56A8.3 promoter-mCherry fusion strains ERT173 and ERT174 were made by Gateway cloning (Life Technologies). Briefly, 1755 nucleotides of genomic DNA upstream of the F56A8.3 start codon was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pDONR P4-P1r vector. This DNA was then recombined into the destination vector pSS-5 generously provided by Dr. Supriya Srinivasan, containing in frame mCherry with the unc-54 3' UTR (plasmid pET336). This promoter-mCherry fusion was co-injected with the dominant marker rol-6 to allow selection of transgenic animals with a roller (rol) phenotype. Three independent lines were verified for similar mCherry expression. Two of these transgenic strains are ERT173 jyEx77[pF56A8.3a::mCherry::unc54 3’UTR] and ERT174 jyEx78[pF56A8.3a::mCherry::unc54 3’UTR]
Antibody production and immunological techniques
A recombinant F56A8.3 protein consisting of the entire N-terminal domain (F56A8.3-NT) (AA 1–243) was used for antibody production at ProSci, Inc (Poway, CA). Briefly, the 729 bp of DNA downstream of the start codon was cloned from cDNA by Gateway cloning into the pDONR221 vector and recombined into the destination vector pET-DEST42 with a C-terminal V5 and 6xHis tags. F56A8.3 protein was induced and purified from E. coli BL21(DE3) pr1952 [23], with Ni-NTA matrix (Qiagen) as described [24]. Two rabbits were immunized with 200 mg of purified F56A8.3-NT in complete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma) at week 0 and boosted with 100 mg of antigen in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma) at weeks 2 and 4 and thereafter every 4 weeks by ProSci Inc. The resulting sera, collected 1 week after each boost, were pooled, and the IgG was purified with protein A-agarose (Invitrogen).
For immunohistochemistry, N2, WU1236, and GH351 animals were anesthetized with 10 mM levamisole, their intestines dissected out, and fixed for 1 hour in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). For N2, dissected intestines were stained with anti-F56A8.3-NT diluted to 10 mg/mL in block buffer (PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 5% BSA, 0.05% NaN3) for 1 hour, followed by Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch) at 2 mg/mL in block. For WU1236 and GH351, intestines were stained as above with anti-F56A8.3-NT, together with the mouse primary antibody anti-GFP (Roche) at 10 mg/mL and the secondary antibody FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Life Technologies) at 2 mg/mL.
CRISPR-Cas9 Targeted Genome Editing
For CRISPR disruption of F56A8.3, we used the technique previously described using the plasmids generously donated by Dr. John Calarco, Peft-3::cas9-SV40_NLS::tbb-2 3'UTR (Addgene plasmid 46168) and PU6::klp-12-sgRNA (Addgene plasmid 46170) [25]. Briefly, an sgRNA targeting the 5' end of F56A8.3 was created using round-the-horn cloning for site directed mutagenesis of PU6::klp-12-sgRNA, replacing the klp-12 sgRNA sequence with the F56A8.3 sequence ATCGCATAAATATAGTCTGA [26]. N2 animals were injected with 112.5 ng/μL total DNA, with Peft-3::cas9 at 50 ng/μL, F56A8.3 sgRNA at 45 ng/μL, and the dominant mCherry markers pGH8 at 10 ng/μL, pCFJ104 at 5 ng/μL, and pCFJ90 at 2.5 ng/μL. Transgenic F1 progeny were screened for mCherry expression and plated individually. After F2 progeny production, F1 animals were screened by single animal PCR using primers to amplify an 80 bp product spanning the Cas9 cut site. PCR products were run on 10% TBE gels (BioRad) to identify heterozygote mutants that had a wild-type 80 base pair (bp) PCR product, together with a larger or smaller PCR product, presumably generated by non-homologous repair after Cas9 cleavage. From these experiments we generated strain ERT325 F56A8.3(jy4).
For CRISPR-mediated deletion of the F56A8.3 region, a homologous recombination (HR) donor template was PCR cloned from genomic DNA to contain the 1796 bp upstream and 1790 bp downstream of the F56A8.3 start and stop codons, respectively. These recombination arms were cloned into the Gateway donor vectors pDONR P4-P1r and pDONR P2r-P3, respectively, and the gene Prps-0::HygR::gpd-2::GFP::unc-54 3'UTR was cloned from the IR99 plasmid (generously donated by Dr. Jason Chin) into pDONR221, flanked by LoxP sites [27]. These three vectors were recombined into the destination vector pDEST R4-R3. N2 animals were injected with a 200 ng/μL total DNA mix, with Peft-3::cas9 at 50 ng/μL, F56A8.3 sgRNA at 50 ng/μL, F56A8.3 HR donor template at 50 ng/μL, and pRF4 (rol-6) at 50 ng/μL. Transgenic F1 progeny were screened by GFP and rol-6 expression and plated individually. After F2 progeny production, plates were screened for 75% segregation of GFP among the F2s to indicate an HR event. A F56A8.3 knockout was verified by PCR for loss of F56A8.3 with internal primers, and for gain of the Prps-0::HygR::gpd-2::GFP::unc-54 3'UTR into the F56A8.3 locus by junction PCR. From these experiments we generated the strain ERT424 F56A8.3(jy8).
Results
An RNAi screen identifies genes important for C. elegans larval arrest induced by N. parisii infection
Previously, we described that N. parisii is a natural microsporidian pathogen of C. elegans that causes a lethal intestinal infection [9]. Here we report the finding that infection of first larval stage (L1) C. elegans animals with very high doses of N. parisii spores leads to an arrest in larval development (see Fig 1A–1C). By contrast, L1s infected with a high dose of killed, non-infectious spores develop normally, indicating that larval arrest after N. parisii exposure is a host response to an active N. parisii infection, and not simply a response to the presence of a high does of N. parisii spores (data not shown). We used the easily scored, visual phenotype of larval arrest to conduct an RNAi screen for host genes required for N. parisii infection/development, using libraries of predicted transcription factors and LRR proteins. The initial screen included approximately 436 genes, and 12 genes were initially scored as hits. We repeated the larval arrest assay with these twelve hits and found that five of them consistently blocked larval arrest after infection, with a visual score of greater than 2.5 (Fig 1A). An interesting hit from this screen was the RNAi clone against a gene coding for a predicted transmembrane LRR protein F56A8.3 (Gene ID: 176740). There is conservation of the LRR-containing, N-terminal region of F56A8.3 with a protein found in numerous animal species, including leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 59 (LRRC59) in humans. RNAi against this gene in C. elegans caused a significant inhibition of arrest at 2 days post-infection (dpi) when compared to the L4440 RNAi control (Fig 1B). These results were consistent across seven independent experiments with approximately 70% of infected F56A8.3 RNAi-treated animals reaching the L4 stage at 2 dpi, compared to approximately 13% of infected control RNAi animals (Fig 1C). Under these conditions almost 100% of uninfected wild-type animals reached the L4 stage. The sequence for the F56A8.3 RNAi clone is provided (S1 Text).
A defect in C. elegans larval development occurs after exposure to a number of pathogens, including the Gram-negative bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa [28]. In order to test for the specificity of this effect, four of the strongest RNAi hits from the N. parisii screen were tested for their effect on larval development after infection with P. aeruginosa. We found that RNAi of some genes, like unc-55 and fkh-10, also inhibited arrest on P. aeruginosa, suggesting they are important for a general larval arrest response, or slowing of development upon infection (Fig 1D) [29, 30]. However, RNAi of F56A8.3 failed to prevent larval arrest on P. aeruginosa, suggesting specificity of this RNAi clone to N. parisii infection (Fig 1D). Therefore, we chose to focus on F56A8.3 because of this strong, consistent larval arrest inhibition by the F56A8.3 RNAi clone after N. parisii infection but not after P. aeruginosa infection.
RNAi against F56A8.3 results in lower N. parisii pathogen load
The lack of larval arrest seen on F56A8.3 RNAi could be due to lower pathogen load or due to disruption of the pathways that mediate arrest upon N. parisii infection. To test if the F56A8.3 RNAi clone affected pathogen load, we performed a series of experiments to quantify the N. parisii parasites at various time points after infection, which represent different stages of the parasite life cycle. N. parisii appears to have a life cycle similar to most microsporidia. Briefly, microsporidian spores fire an infection apparatus called a polar tube to inject their contents directly into host cells, where they replicate and ultimately differentiate back into infectious spores that exit hosts to infect other individuals [4, 9]. At 8 hours post infection (hpi) in C. elegans, we can use FISH-staining to visualize the early, single nucleated stage of the parasite called a 'sporoplasm' [1]. Here, we found that there were about 40% fewer N. parisii sporoplasms after F56A8.3 RNAi compared to empty RNAi vector controls when measured by FISH against N. parisii rRNA (Fig 2A). At 30 hpi, N. parisii has replicated as multi-nucleate meronts throughout the intestine, but mature spores are not yet visible [1, 12]. Here, we found an approximately 50% reduction in pathogen load after F56A8.3 RNAi across five different spore doses as measured by qRT-PCR for N. parisii rRNA (Fig 2B). Similar results were seen with qPCR for N. parisii β-tubulin transcript at the same doses and time point (S1 Fig). At 40 hpi, when the parasitic meronts have differentiated back into spores, we found that F56A8.3 RNAi resulted in approximately 40% reduction in the number of spores produced per animal compared to RNAi controls (Fig 2C). The experiments described above were performed with C. elegans infected after the L1 stage (see Materials and Methods), while the larval arrest experiments infected C. elegans at the L1 stage. Indeed, similar results were seen when the animals were infected at the L1 stages, with F56A8.3 RNAi resulting in lower spore load (S2 Fig). Together, these results show that RNAi against F56A8.3 results in lower N. parisii pathogen load across the majority of stages in the parasite life cycle. This lesser pathogen burden could explain the inhibition of larval arrest caused by this RNAi clone, as we show that increasing N. parisii pathogen load results in decreasing worm size (S3 Fig). We concluded from these results that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone was reducing the expression of a protein required for N. parisii infection.
F56A8.3 protein is found on lysosome related organelles (LROs) in the C. elegans intestine
Before we learned that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone was likely acting off-target to affect N. parisii infection (see results below), we studied the F56A8.3 target gene further. F56A8.3 encodes a single-pass transmembrane protein with five leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). Since LRR domains are found in numerous proteins that play a role in host-pathogen interactions, such as Toll-like and NOD-like receptors (TLRs and NLRs, respectively) [31, 32], we sought to further characterize the role of F56A8.3 in N. parisii infection. First, we investigated the tissue expression of F56A8.3 by creating a transgenic strain that expressed mCherry under control of the putative F56A8.3 promoter. This promoter drove mCherry expression in the intestine, pharynx, and some anterior and posterior neurons (Fig 3A). Given that N. parisii infection occurs exclusively in the intestine of C. elegans, we conducted tissue-specific RNAi to investigate if F56A8.3 was acting in the intestine to facilitate infection. Using the intestinal-specific RNAi strain MGH167, we found that F56A8.3 RNAi resulted in significant inhibition of larval arrest compared to the RNAi control (Fig 3B). By contrast, there was no significant effect of this RNAi clone on larval arrest in the muscle-specific RNAi strain SPC272. These results suggest that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone acts in the intestine to inhibit N. parisii infection.
We next investigated the subcellular localization of the endogenous F56A8.3 protein in C. elegans intestinal cells. We generated rabbit anti-F56A8.3 polyclonal antibodies using an N-terminal domain of F56A8.3 (from the initial methionine to the beginning of the transmembrane domain) expressed and purified from E. coli. This antibody recognized a protein band of the correct size on Western blots (see below). With immunohistochemistry of dissected C. elegans intestines, we found that anti-F56A8.3 localized to the membrane surrounding large circular structures in the intestine generically called “gut granules” (Fig 3C, left) [33]. This antibody signal was noticeably reduced in wild type animals treated with F56A8.3 RNAi (Fig 3C, right), further confirming the specificity of the antibody and indicating that this RNAi clone does indeed reduce expression of endogenous F56A8.3 protein. In addition, we found that F56A8.3 colocalized with the zinc transporter CDF-2, which is found on a subset of gut granules called lysosome-related organelles (LROs) (Fig 3D) [17]. Similarly, F56A8.3 colocalized with another LRO membrane marker in the intestine, GLO-3 (S4 Fig) [16].
Mutation of the F56A8.3 gene does not recapitulate the phenotype of the RNAi clone
The N. parisii infection phenotypes we saw with the F56A8.3 gene were all conducted using RNAi. We confirmed that the F56A8.3 transcript was knocked down by the RNAi clone (S5 Fig), and that levels of the endogenous protein were reduced (Fig 3C). However, we wanted to confirm that inhibition of larval arrest and reduced pathogen load from the RNAi clone was due to this F56A8.3 knockdown and not due to an off-target effect. Since there were no existing null mutants for F56A8.3, we created a null mutant using the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted genome editing. The F56A8.3 genomic region is predicted to encode two separate proteins, a full length protein called isoform a (F56A8.3a), and a truncated protein called isoform b (F56A8.3b), which lacks approximately 79% of the N-terminal region upstream of the TM domain, including the entire LRR domain (Fig 4A, bottom). The F56A8.3a transcripts encompass the entire coding region, while the F56A8.3b transcripts vary dramatically in length, with some containing only the downstream coding regions and other covering the entire coding region (Fig 4A, top). The F56A8.3 RNAi clone targets the 5’ coding region of the F56A8.3 (indicated with a dotted line at the top of Fig 4A), which would be predicted to knockdown all transcript isoforms from the F56A8.3a gene. Therefore, we created an F56A8.3a mutant by designing a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the 5’ coding region of F56A8.3a gene (Fig 4B). Using the protocol developed by Friedland et al. [25], we isolated a 5 bp deletion in the early F56A8.3 coding region, which is predicted to cause a frameshift and early stop codon (Fig 4B). This frameshift mutant F56A8.3 (jy4), showed a complete loss of F56A8.3a protein as detected by Western blot (Fig 4D, right). However, when the F56A8.3(jy4) mutant was infected with N. parisii, we saw no inhibition of larval arrest compared to the control (Fig 4C). Furthermore, F56A8.3 RNAi treatment of F56A8.3(jy4) mutants caused an inhibition of arrest similar to control animals on F56A8.3 RNAi (Fig 4C). These experiments were performed in an eri-1 mutant background, because eri-1 mutants exhibited more robust larval arrest than wild-type N2 animals. Altogether, these data suggest that the larval arrest and pathogen load phenotypes seen on F56A8.3 RNAi are not due to knockdown of F56A8.3a protein.
A complete deletion of the F56A8.3 genomic region does not recapitulate the infection phenotypes seen with F56A8.3 RNAi
We next sought to determine whether the truncated F56A8.3b protein was playing a role in N. parisii infection, because there are some F56A8.3b transcripts that could be targeted by the F56A8.3 RNAi clone (Fig 4A). In support of this idea, we found that wild-type animals treated with F56A8.3 RNAi showed a reduction in F56A8.3b protein, as well as F56A8.3a protein, although the decrease of F56A8.3b protein was not noticeable in F56A8.3(jy4) animals (Fig 4D). In fact, the amount of F56A8.3b protein appears to increase in the F56A8.3a null mutant F56A8.3(jy4) compared to N2 wild-type animals (Fig 4D, comparing left panel to right panel) which may represent a compensatory mechanism by the mutant. Thus, it was possible that the several-fold increase in F58A8.3b protein seen in F56A8.3(jy4) was rescuing these animals to WT infection levels. To determine if F56A8.3b plays a role in N. parisii infection, we knocked out the entire F56A8.3 locus and replaced it with a GFP transgene. This editing was done using the same CRISPR-Cas9 technique described earlier, but included a donor vector containing a GFP transgene driven flanked by 1796 bp and 1790 bp upstream and downstream of the F56A8.3 coding region, respectively (Fig 5A). This donor vector was designed to completely remove the F56A8.3 gene, which includes the entire sequence homologous to the F56A8.3 RNAi clone. We screened for successfully engineered genomes via GFP expression in the F1 progeny of the injected animals, and verified with PCR to span the upstream and downstream insertion sites (Fig 5A, right). We isolated and homozygosed one knockout F56A8.3 mutant F56A8.3(jy8). This mutant completely lacked both F56A8.3a and F56A8.3b protein, as detected by Western blot analysis (Fig 5B). However, the F56A8.3(jy8) mutants exhibited no inhibition of larval arrest compared to the control animals after infection with N. parisii (Fig 5C), and treatment of F56A8.3(jy8) animals with F56A8.3 RNAi showed an inhibition of arrest similar to control animals on F56A8.3 RNAi. We also analyzed spore production and found that F56A8.3(jy8) mutants had no difference in spore production at 40 hpi when compared to control animals, yet showed a similar reduction after F56A8.3 RNAi (Fig 5D). Altogether, these results indicate that the infection phenotypes seen on the F56A8.3 RNAi clone are likely due to an off-target RNAi effect of the F56A8.3 RNAi clone.
Discussion
Here, we report N. parisii-induced larval arrest in C. elegans and the results of an RNAi screen to identify host genes that conferred susceptibility to microsporidian infection. We chose to focus on the F56A8.3 because its RNAi clone was one of the strongest and most robust hits in this screen, and because this gene encodes a conserved transmembrane protein containing an LRR domain, which we hypothesized was being hijacked by N. parisii for infection. While we were able to characterize an effect of F56A8.3 RNAi on infection and show that the F56A8.3 target is knocked-down by the RNAi clone, we ultimately found that the F56A8.3 gene is not responsible for the larval arrest phenotype. These findings provide a cautionary tale about relying solely on an RNAi clone to assess the functional relevance of a gene. However, our description of larval arrest upon infection, results from an RNAi screen for host genes important for microsporidian infection, and characterization of the expression and localization of the F56A8.3 protein provide information and tools useful for further study of this phenotype and protein.
Microsporidian infection induces larval arrest in C. elegans
Larval arrest is among a range of phenotypes induced by microsporidian infection. These phenotypes can vary from benign to lethal depending on the species of pathogen and host involved. Acute microsporidian infection places a substantial burden on the resources of the host, as all of the pathogen replication occurs inside host cells. Thus, it is likely that C. elegans larvae can sense (e.g. through a nutritional cue) the extensive N. parisii replication occurring in their intestinal cells and then arrest development [1]. Other microsporidian infections have been described to arrest development of their hosts, such as Nosema whitei infection of the flour beetle [34, 35], and Nosema bombycis infection of the silkworm [36]. We used this microsporidia-induced larval arrest to conduct an RNAi screen for host genes that mediate susceptibility to N. parisii infection. Indeed, one of the strongest hits in this screen (F56A8.3 RNAi) resulted in lower pathogen load at multiple parasite stages. Thus, if larval arrest is a result of substantial pathogen burden on the host, then inhibition of pathogen growth via this RNAi clone would be expected to relieve some of this burden and allow larval development. However, it is possible that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone is also able to disrupt the pathways that mediate arrest upon N. parisii infection.
C. elegans RNAi screen for host genes important for microsporidian infection identifies the F56A8.3 RNAi clone
The F56A8.3 RNAi clone was a hit from our screen and this RNAi clone was capable of knocking down the F56A8.3 transcript and its protein products. However, the N. parisii infection phenotypes were not due to knockdown of this gene, based on our analysis of two F56A8.3 mutants we made, including a complete deletion mutant. It is likely that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone is knocking down another C. elegans gene, although candidate genes are not obvious based on homology to the F56A8.3 RNAi clone sequence. In fact, only two other C. elegans genes were identified as weak putative targets of the RNAi clone using the program dsCheck, fcd-2 and F57E7.1, and neither of these genes transcripts were reduced on F56A8.3 RNAi, as measured by qRT-PCR (data not shown) [37]. It is likely that this off-target host gene is acting to facilitate N. parisii infection progression in the intestines of C. elegans, based on the reduced pathogenic outcome at numerous time points of infection, and the specificity of the larval arrest phenotype when RNAi was restricted to the intestine. It is also a possibility that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone is knocking down a microsporidian transcript needed for pathogen replication. However, this would require pathogen transcripts to be secreted from an early, intracellular parasitic stage into the intestinal cytoplasm, or require the pathogen to take up small RNAs derived from the F56A8.3 RNAi clone to have a biological impact in the parasite. Although some microsporidian genomes encode for RNAi machinery, N. parisii is not one of those genomes, suggesting it does not undergo RNAi [1]. Furthermore, BLAST analysis of the N. parisii ERTm1 genome did not identify any regions of the genome that would be targeted by this RNAi clone (data not shown). Thus, the mechanism by which the F56A8.3 RNAi clone blocks infection-induced larval arrest remains unresolved.
The F56A8.3 gene encodes a predicted transmembrane domain protein with LRR repeats that localizes to intestinal lysosome-related organelles
Because the F56A8.3 gene initially appeared to be responsible for the infection-induced phenotype, we characterized the function and expression of this gene, and developed useful reagents for its future study. F56A8.3 encodes a predicted single-pass transmembrane protein with an N-terminal LRR and coiled-coil domain, and a large C-terminal domain of unknown function (Fig 4A). The N-terminal domain, which includes the entire region upstream of the transmembrane domain, is conserved across numerous animal species including humans. In C. elegans, we found that the 5’ region directly upstream of the F56A8.3 start codon acts to drive transgene expression in the intestine, pharynx, and some neurons. Furthermore, we found that the endogenous F56A8.3 protein localized in the intestine to LROs, acidic organelles containing some lysosomal proteins that are thought to perform cell type-specific storage and secretion functions [38]. Some examples of LROs in other animals are melanosomes, platelet-dense granules, and acrosomes found in melanocytes, platelets, and sperm cells, respectively [39, 40]. Currently, only a handful of proteins have been found to localize to LROs in the C. elegans intestine, including CDF-2 and GLO-1. Despite comprising a significant portion of the intestine, the function of these organelles is still relatively unknown, aside from their role in zinc storage to limit zinc toxicity [17, 41, 42].
In C. elegans, the F56A8.3 gene was predicted to encode for two protein products, the full-length F56A8.3a and a truncated F56A8.3b that lacks approximately 75% of the N-terminal domain, including the entire LRR domain (Fig 4A). We show with Westerns blots that both of these proteins are indeed expressed in C. elegans, and that the F56A8.3 RNAi clone can knockdown both proteins. We generated two mutants in these proteins using the CRISPR-Cas9 system: F56A8.3a(jy4) mutants completely lack the F56A8.3a isoform and F56A8.3(jy8) mutants completely lack both the F56A8.3a and F56A8.3b isoforms. Our analysis showed that in F56A8.3a(jy4) mutants, the amount of F56A8.3b protein is increased dramatically, which likely represents a compensatory mechanism and suggests that F56A8.3b might be involved in similar functions as F56A8.3a. However, both of these mutants appeared phenotypically normal with no obvious defects. In particular, we observed no defect in the number or appearance of LROs in F56A8.3a(jy4) mutants compared to wild-type animals (data not shown), so the functions of the F56A8.3 proteins are yet to be determined. The putative human ortholog of F56A8.3 encodes LRRC59. This protein is localized to the ER membrane, with the N-terminal, LRR-containing domain projecting into the cytoplasm where it acts as a receptor for cytoplasmic fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) [43, 44]. In light of the data here, it would be interesting to determine if the F56A8.3a and/or F56A8.3b proteins are acting to regulate the biogenesis or function of LROs in the C. elegans intestine.
Future Directions
The promising infection phenotypes seen using the F56A8.3 RNAi clone were ultimately not due to knockdown of F56A8.3, but likely due to an off-target effect on another C. elegans gene. In future directions, this off-target gene could be identified by conducting RNA-seq to identify genes with reduced expression in F56A8.3(jy8) mutants treated with F56A8.3 RNAi, compared to mutants treated with control RNAi. Genes with lowered expression could then be verified for their effects on larval arrest and N. parisii pathogen load with RNAi and mutant analysis. In addition to F56A8.3, there were several other hits from our screen that could be further explored, with the goal of providing more insight into the host/pathogen interactions that underlie infections by microsporidia.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Linda Tong and Tal Dror for their lab assistance and technical support. We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), Kerry Kornfeld, Greg Herman, Gary Ruvkun, Justine Melo, Sean Curran, Antony Jose, and Alex Soukas for C. elegans strains. We also thank John Calarco, Supriya Srinivasan, and Jason Chin for plasmids, and Jens Lykke-Andersen for the E. coli strain. We thank Rebecca Laplante, Kirthi Reddy, Suzy Szumowski, Michael Botts, and Aaron Reinke for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to RJL, (https://www.nsfgrfp.org), the National Institutes of Health Cell and Molecular Genetics Training Grant (T32 GM008666) to RJL, (http://www.nih.gov), by NIAID R01 AI087528 (http://www.niaid.nih.gov/), the Searle Scholars Program (http://www.searlescholars.net/), Packard Foundation (http://www.packard.org/) and Burroughs Wellcome Fund (http://www.bwfund.org/grant-programs/infectious-diseases/investigators-in-pathogenesis-of-infectious-disease) to ERT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Cuomo CA, Desjardins CA, Bakowski MA, Goldberg J, Ma AT, Becnel JJ, et al. Microsporidian genome analysis reveals evolutionary strategies for obligate intracellular growth. Genome Res. 2012;22(12):2478–88. 10.1101/gr.142802.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Keeling PJ, Fast NM. Microsporidia: biology and evolution of highly reduced intracellular parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:93–116. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160854 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Texier C, Vidau C, Vigues B, El Alaoui H, Delbac F. Microsporidia: a model for minimal parasite-host interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(4):443–9. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Williams BA. Unique physiology of host-parasite interactions in microsporidia infections. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(11):1551–60. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01362.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Didier ES, Weiss LM. Microsporidiosis: current status. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2006;19(5):485–92. 10.1097/01.qco.0000244055.46382.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Didier ES, Weiss LM. Microsporidiosis: not just in AIDS patients. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2011;24(5):490–5. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834aa152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Didier ES, Maddry JA, Brindley PJ, Stovall ME, Didier PJ. Therapeutic strategies for human microsporidia infections. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2005;3(3):419–34. 10.1586/14787210.3.3.419 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Félix M- A, Duveau F. Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae . BMC Biology. 2012;10(1):59 10.1186/1741-7007-10-59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Troemel ER, Félix M- A, Whiteman NK, Barrière A, Ausubel FM. Microsporidia are natural intracellular parasites of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . PLoS biology. 2008;6(12):2736–52. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060309 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bakowski MA, Luallen RL, Troemel ER. Microsporidia Infections in Caenorhabditis elegans and Other Nematodes In: Weiss LM, Becnel JJ, editors. Microsporidia: Pathogens of Opportunity. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 341–56. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics. 1974;77(1):71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Estes KA, Szumowski SC, Troemel ER. Non-lytic, actin-based exit of intracellular parasites from C. elegans intestinal cells. PLoS Pathogens. 2011;7(9):e1002227 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002227 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kennedy S, Wang D, Ruvkun G. A conserved siRNA-degrading RNase negatively regulates RNA interference in C. elegans . Nature. 2004;427(6975):645–9. 10.1038/nature02302 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jose AM, Smith JJ, Hunter CP. Export of RNA silencing from C. elegans tissues does not require the RNA channel SID-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(7):2283–8. 10.1073/pnas.0809760106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Melo JA, Ruvkun G. Inactivation of conserved C. elegans genes engages pathogen- and xenobiotic-associated defenses. Cell. 2012;149(2):452–66. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.050 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rabbitts BM, Ciotti MK, Miller NE, Kramer M, Lawrenson AL, Levitte S, et al. glo-3, a novel Caenorhabditis elegans gene, is required for lysosome-related organelle biogenesis. Genetics. 2008;180(2):857–71. 10.1534/genetics.108.093534 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Roh HC, Collier S, Guthrie J, Robertson JD, Kornfeld K. Lysosome-related organelles in intestinal cells are a zinc storage site in C. elegans . Cell Metabolism. 2012;15(1):88–99. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Estes KA, Dunbar TL, Powell JR, Ausubel FM, Troemel ER. bZIP transcription factor zip-2 mediates an early response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(5):2153–8. 10.1073/pnas.0914643107 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Parry DH, Xu J, Ruvkun G. A whole-genome RNAi Screen for C elegans miRNA pathway genes. Curr Biol. 2007;17(23):2013–22. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic acids research. 2001;29(9):e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bakowski MA, Desjardins CA, Smelkinson MG, Dunbar TA, Lopez-Moyado IF, Rifkin SA, et al. Ubiquitin-mediated response to microsporidia and virus infection in C. elegans . PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(6):e1004200 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Szumowski SC, Botts MR, Popovich JJ, Smelkinson MG, Troemel ER. The small GTPase RAB-11 directs polarized exocytosis of the intracellular pathogen N. parisii for fecal-oral transmission from C. elegans . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(22):8215–20. 10.1073/pnas.1400696111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nielsen J, Christiansen J, Lykke-Andersen J, Johnsen AH, Wewer UM, Nielsen FC. A family of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding proteins represses translation in late development. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(2):1262–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Luallen RJ, Fu H, Agrawal-Gamse C, Mboudjeka I, Huang W, Lee FH, et al. A yeast glycoprotein shows high-affinity binding to the broadly neutralizing human immunodeficiency virus antibody 2G12 and inhibits gp120 interactions with 2G12 and DC-SIGN. Journal of virology. 2009;83(10):4861–70. 10.1128/JVI.02537-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, Colaiácovo MP, Church GM, Calarco JA. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Methods. 2013. 10.1038/nmeth.2532 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.OpenWetWare [Internet]. Round-the-horn site-directed mutagenesis. Accessed 15 September 2014. 2013. Available from: http://www.openwetware.org/index.php?title=%27Round-the-horn_site-directed_mutagenesis&oldid=686665.
- 27. Radman I, Greiss S, Chin JW. Efficient and rapid C. elegans transgenesis by bombardment and hygromycin B selection. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76019 10.1371/journal.pone.0076019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Richardson CE, Kooistra T, Kim DH. An essential role for XBP-1 in host protection against immune activation in C. elegans . Nature. 2010;463(7284):1092–5. 10.1038/nature08762 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hope IA, Mounsey A, Bauer P, Aslam S. The forkhead gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans . Gene. 2003;304:43–55. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhou HM, Walthall WW. UNC-55, an orphan nuclear hormone receptor, orchestrates synaptic specificity among two classes of motor neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans The Journal of Neuroscience. 1998;18(24):10438–44. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chamaillard M, Girardin SE, Viala J, Philpott DJ. Nods, Nalps and Naip: intracellular regulators of bacterial-induced inflammation. Cellular Microbiology. 2003;5(9):581–92. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors. Annual review of immunology. 2003;21:335–76. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. McGhee JD. The C. elegans intestine. WormBook: the online review of C elegans biology. 2007:1–36. 10.1895/wormbook.1.133.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Blaser M, Schmid-Hempel P. Determinants of virulence for the parasite Nosema whitei in its host Tribolium castaneum . Journal of invertebrate pathology. 2005;89(3):251–7. 10.1016/j.jip.2005.04.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Becnel JJ, Andreadis TG. Microsporidia in Insects In: Wittner M, Weiss LM, editors. The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1999. p. 447–501. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ma Z, Li C, Pan G, Li Z, Han B, Xu J, et al. Genome-wide transcriptional response of silkworm (Bombyx mori) to infection by the microsporidian Nosema bombycis . PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84137 10.1371/journal.pone.0084137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Naito Y, Yamada T, Matsumiya T, Ui-Tei K, Saigo K, Morishita S. dsCheck: highly sensitive off-target search software for double-stranded RNA-mediated RNA interference. Nucleic acids research. 2005;33:(Web Server issue)W589–91. 10.1093/nar/gki419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dell'Angelica EC, Mullins C, Caplan S, Bonifacino JS. Lysosome-related organelles. FASEB journal. 2000;14(10):1265–78. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. King SM, Reed GL. Development of platelet secretory granules. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2002;13(4):293–302. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Raposo G, Marks MS. The dark side of lysosome-related organelles: specialization of the endocytic pathway for melanosome biogenesis. Traffic. 2002;3(4):237–48. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Delahaye JL, Foster OK, Vine A, Saxton DS, Curtin TP, Somhegyi H, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans HOPS and CCZ-1 mediate trafficking to lysosome-related organelles independently of RAB-7 and SAND-1. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25(7):1073–96. 10.1091/mbc.E13-09-0521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hermann GJ, Scavarda E, Weis AM, Saxton DS, Thomas LL, Salesky R, et al. C. elegans BLOC-1 functions in trafficking to lysosome-related gut granules. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43043 10.1371/journal.pone.0043043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Skjerpen CS, Wesche J, Olsnes S. Identification of ribosome-binding protein p34 as an intracellular protein that binds acidic fibroblast growth factor. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(26):23864–71. 10.1074/jbc.M112193200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zhen Y, Sørensen V, Skjerpen CS, Haugsten EM, Jin Y, Wälchli S, et al. Nuclear import of exogenous FGF1 requires the ER-protein LRRC59 and the importins Kpnα1 and Kpnβ1. Traffic. 2012;13(5):650–64. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01341.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.