Abstract
A delay in the mechanical transplantation (MT) of rice seedlings frequently occurs in Huanghuai wheat-rice rotation cropping districts of China, due to the late harvest of wheat, the poor weather conditions and the insufficiency of transplanters, missing the optimum transplanting time and causing seedlings to age. To identify how delaying transplanting rice affects the agronomic characteristics including the growth duration, photosynthetic productivity and dry matter remobilization efficiency and the grain yield under mechanical transplanting pattern, an experiment with a split-plot design was conducted over two consecutive years. The main plot includes two types of cultivation: mechanical transplanting and artificial transplanting (AT). The subplot comprises four japonica rice cultivars. The results indicate that the rice jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages were postponed under MT when using AT as a control. The tiller occurrence number, dry matter weight per tiller, accumulative dry matter for the population, leaf area index, crop growth rate, photosynthetic potential, and dry matter remobilization efficiency of the leaf under MT significantly decreased compared to those under AT. In contrast, the reduction rate of the leaf area during the heading-maturity stage was markedly enhanced under MT. The numbers of effective panicles and filled grains per panicle and the grain yield significantly decreased under MT. A significant correlation was observed between the dry matter production, remobilization and distribution characteristics and the grain yield. We infer that, as with rice from old seedlings, the decrease in the tiller occurrence, the photosynthetic productivity and the assimilate remobilization efficiency may be important agronomic traits that are responsible for the reduced grain yield under MT.
Introduction
In China, rice is a staple food, feeding more than 65% of the population. The Huanghuai district is one of the most important rice-production districts contributing to the high grain yield in China. In this region, the rice-wheat rotation is a dominant cropping system with japonica rice as rotation crop after the harvest of wheat, producing approximately 7500 kg of rice grain yield per hectare on average [1]. The conventional cultivation pattern of rice in this region is artificial transplanting, i.e., transplanting rice seedlings into the paddy field by hand, which is very laborious. This cultivation pattern is not only cumbersome but also labor-intensive for farmers, involving working and moving in a stooping posture in a paddy field [2]. In recent years, rural labor has become increasingly insufficient and expensive, mainly due to the migration of labor from the rural areas to the cities. Rural employment decreased from 355 million in 1995 to 314 million in 2007 in China, but the labor ratio of off-farm employment to total employment increased from 33% in 1986 to 63% in 2008 in the Shandong province of China [3,4], triggering enhanced labor costs in agricultural production [5]. The same scenario has also appeared in other developing countries, such as India, Peru, and Bangladesh [6,7,8]. Now, the artificial transplanting mode that cannot meet the requirement of rice production has been gradually replaced due to the serious deficiency in labor employment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to adopt a simple and convenient planting pattern as a substitute to resolve the problem that resulted from labor scarcity and expensive production costs.
The rice mechanical transplanting pattern, which was initially developed in Japan, has been a feasible cultivation pattern and is widely applied in Japan, Korea and other countries due to its ease of cultivation and considerable economic benefits brought by labor cost savings [9,10,11,12]. In China, rice mechanical transplanting technology has been explored since the 1950s. However, until now, the technology has not been widely applied in rice production due to relatively stagnated research based on rice production districts belonging to different cropping systems. In the rice-wheat rotation cropping system, one prominent issue preventing the application of mechanical transplantation technology is the paradox between the optimum rice seedling age at transplanting as required by the transplanting machine and the prolonged seedling age as triggered by some restricting factors [13,14,15]. The optimum rice seedling age, being conducive to the occurrence of tiller, is capable of laying a solid foundation to obtain a high grain yield. In general, young seedlings from 15–20 days of age, being characterized by suitable plant height ranging from 12–17 cm, and stubborn individual plants with enough nutrient supply from the seedling-nursery tray are suitable for mechanical transplanting [16]. These plants take less time to resume normal growth after mechanical harm to roots from being transplanted.
In the Huanghuai district of China, transplanting rice seedlings by machine is frequently delayed, even causing the seedling age to be greater than 40 days, due to the late harvest of wheat, the appearance of unfavorable weather and the limited number of transplanting machines. If sowing is delayed, some varieties with long-growth duration fail to mature normally, thereby inducing the frequent occurrence of the postponement of transplantation. Usually, rice seeds were sown in hard trays at a high density for MT. Because of intensive nutrition competition among individuals, rice seedlings, which grow for a longer duration in hard trays and are not transplanted by machine in time, could receive detrimental influences [13]. These seedlings are customarily called as “old seedlings”. Until now, the performances of agronomy and yield traits in rice from old seedlings under MT remain unclear. Therefore, there is a need to conduct related research with rice plants that are transplanted by hand as controls.
The objective of the study was to test the effects of delaying transplanting on agronomic traits that are related to the grain yield and the yield component of rice under MT. These results will provide useful references for the cultivation of rice via mechanical transplantation in rice-growing districts.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
We obtained the relevant permission from the corresponding institute (Shandong Rice Research Institute) for planting our materials in the field. This work was unrelated to ethics issues, and no specific permissions were required for the described field study (no specific permissions were required for these locations/activities). We confirm that the field study did not involve endangered or protected species.
Experimental site and cultivar description
The field experiments were conducted at Yutai (35°00’ N, 116°39’ E) in Shandong province, China, from May to October during 2012 and 2013. The site is located in the Huanghuai district of China, with a cultivation pattern belonging to the typical rice-wheat cropping system. The data of daily average air temperature and rainfall during the rice growth season are shown in Fig 1. In 2012, the means of the daily average air temperature and precipitation were 23.94 °C and 29.09 mm, respectively. In 2013, these values were 24.87 °C and 39.83 mm, respectively. The average temperature in 2013 was approximately 1 °C higher than that in 2012. The total precipitation during the rice growth season in 2012 was 4741 mm, being 1512 mm less than that in 2013. The soil type was clay loam, and the basic fertilities were depicted as follows: organic matter 34.00 g kg-1, total nitrogen 1.94 g kg-1, available N 74.73 mg kg-1, available P 43.98 mg kg-1 and available K 199.50 mg kg-1. Four conventional japonica rice cultivars that are widely cultivated in local production, Shengdao2572, Daliang202, Huaidao11 and Jindao263, were used in the experiment.
Fig 1. Mean daily air temperature and precipitation during rice growth in 2012 and 2013.
Experimental design and cultivation management
The experiment was a split-plot design with three replications. The transplanting patterns, artificial transplantation (AT) and mechanical transplantation (MT), were assigned as main plots, with four cultivars being randomly allotted to sub-plots. To maintain independent water and fertilizer managements for the two transplanting patterns, the main plots were separated by a 50-cm-wide ridge with plastic film inserted into the soil at a depth of 30 cm.
According to the local rice production, rice seeds were sown on 15 May and 18 May for the artificial and mechanical transplanting patterns, respectively. The ratio of rice seedling bed area to paddy field area was 1:20 under AT while it was 1:80 under MT. The rice seedling nursery bed dimension for each cultivar was 4.5 m2 under AT and 1.125 m2 under MT. The sowing density was 74.07 g/m2 under AT and 411.52 g/m2 under MT. The rice seeds were sown on nursery bed for seedling nursery under AT. Urea was broadcast at 7.5 g/m2 and 14.9 g/m2 when the leaf age reached 2.1 and 4. The soil of nursery bed maintained moisture before the 3-leaf stage and a shallow-water was kept after the 3-leaf stage. The nursery measurements of the rice seedlings for MT were established according to the method of Yu [16] with melioration. Briefly, emerged seeds (150 g) were sown on each plastic tray (the cavity size was 58 cm long by 28 cm wide by 2.8 cm high) containing 4 kg of soil. All of the plastic trays were placed on the nursery bed when the height of the seedlings reached approximately 1.5 cm. Before the leaf age reached 1.1, the seedlings were irrigated and then drained when the water depth was as high as the nursery bed. Subsequently, intermittent irrigation (drying-wetting alternation) was performed, i.e., the seedlings were irrigated until the surface soil in each plastic tray became dry. Urea was applied at 7.5 g/m2 when the seedling leaf age was 1.1. The rice seedlings were uniformly transplanted to the paddy field on 28 June for both of the transplanting patterns across the two study years.
When transplanted, the rice seedlings for the mechanical transplantation pattern were 42 days old with an average leaf age of approximately 4.5 and a plant height within 19 cm. A transplanter (KUBATO, SPU-60) that was made in Japan was used to complete the mechanical transplantation. The distances between the rows and hills were 30 cm and 12 cm, respectively, with 3–4 and 4–5 seedlings per hill for the artificial and mechanical transplantation patterns. The size of each sub-plot was 30 m2. Fertilizer and other agronomy managements were in accordance with local practices. The total N application amount was 270 kg ha-1 with an N, P and K application rate of 2:1:1.
Sampling and determination
After the rice seedlings were transplanted to the field, the numbers of tiller occurrences of 20 fixed hills from each plot were surveyed at 4-d intervals from 16 to 40 days in 2012 and at 5-d intervals from 11 to 51 days in 2013. The dates of rice jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages in every treatment were recorded, respectively. During the four growth stages that were mentioned above, the above-ground parts of the rice plants from 6 hills from each treatment were sampled and taken to the laboratory, where they were dried at 105 °C for 0.5 h and subsequently divided into two (leaf, and stem and sheath at the jointing stage) or three (leaf; stem and sheath; and panicle at the booting, heading and maturity stages) parts. Then, the separated organs were dried at 70 °C until constant weight and weighed to determine the dry matter weight.
At maturity, thirty plants of each plot were randomly selected to measure the plant height in the field, and the grain yield from each plot was obtained by reaping 3 m2 of rice plants (excluding the border plants). The rice grain yield was determined with the moisture content being adjusted to 14%. The agronomic traits of the panicle and yield components, including the panicle length; the number of the primary and secondary branches and the total and filled grains per panicle; the effective number of panicles per m2; and the 1000-grain weight, were measured by randomly selecting 30 rice plants (except for the border plants) from each plot.
Data processing
Based on the parameters that were explicated above, the dry matter remobilization amount, the remobilization efficiency and conversion rate, the reduction rate of the leaf area, the photosynthetic potential and the population growth rate were calculated according to the following equations [17,18]:
Dry matter remobilization amount (g) = Dry matter weight per tiller at heading-dry matter weight per tiller at maturity
Dry matter remobilization efficiency (%) = 100×dry matter remobilization amount/ dry matter weight per tiller at maturity
Dry matter conversion rate (%) = 100×dry matter remobilization amount/dry weight of the grains per tiller at maturity
Leaf area index (LAI) = leaf area of the land area per m2
Reduction rate of leaf area (m2 d-1) = (LAI2-LAI1) / (t2-t1)
Where LAI1 is the initial LAI, LAI2 is the LAI that was measured the second time, t1 and t2 represent the dates of the first and the second measurements, respectively, and the difference between these dates is the time interval of the two measurements.
Photosynthetic potential of population (m2 d) = 1/2(L1+L2) × (t2-t1)
Where L1 and L2 are the leaf areas that were measured at the first and second times, t1 and t2 represent the dates of the first and the second measurements, respectively, and the difference between these dates is the time interval of the two measurements.
Crop growth rate (g m-2 d-1) = (w2-w1) / (t2-t1)
Where w1 and w2 represent the dry matter weight of the population tested as measured the first and second times, respectively, and the difference between t2 and t1 is the time interval of the two measurements.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 11.0 (Statistical Package of the Social Science). To evaluate the differences between the treatments, the means were separated by Least Significance Difference (LSD) at the 5% significance level. The cultivars and cultivation patterns were regarded as fixed factors. The graphics were generated using SigmaPlot 10.0.
Results
Performance of the main growth duration for rice from old seedlings under MT
The dates for the main growth stages of the rice under AT and MT are shown in Table 1. In 2012, compared to those under AT, the rice joining, booting, heading and maturity stages were delayed 9–13 d, 7–14 d, 6–11 d and 6–8 d, respectively, under MT. In 2013, these stages were postponed for 3–8 d, 4–5 d, 3–5 d and 4–5 d, respectively. The difference was more pronounced in 2012 than in 2013, with the delayed days for the former being 2–9 d more than those of the latter.
Table 1. Dates of the different growth stages of rice under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Dates for different growth stages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | Jointing | Booting | Heading | Maturity |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 2-Aug | 12-Aug | 21-Aug | 6-Oct |
| MT | 13-Aug | 23-Aug | 30-Aug | 12-Oct | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 4-Aug | 16-Aug | 25-Aug | 13-Oct | |
| MT | 17-Aug | 30-Aug | 6-Sep | 20-Oct | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 9-Aug | 22-Aug | 1-Sep | 15-Oct | |
| MT | 19-Aug | 31-Aug | 7-Sep | 23-Oct | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 10-Aug | 24-Aug | 2-Sep | 17-Oct | |
| MT | 19-Aug | 1-Sep | 8-Sep | 24-Oct | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 30-Jul | 8-Aug | 17-Aug | 3-Oct |
| MT | 3-Aug | 13-Aug | 22-Aug | 7-Oct | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 4-Aug | 14-Aug | 22-Aug | 8-Oct | |
| MT | 7-Aug | 18-Aug | 27-Aug | 13-Oct | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 5-Aug | 16-Aug | 26-Aug | 12-Oct | |
| MT | 13-Aug | 20-Aug | 29-Aug | 16-Oct | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 6-Aug | 17-Aug | 26-Aug | 13-Oct | |
| MT | 10-Aug | 22-Aug | 31-Aug | 18-Oct | ||
Dynamics of tiller occurrence for rice from old seedlings under MT
The dynamics of tiller occurrence under AT and MT are shown in Fig 2. The tiller number for all of the examined cultivars under MT exhibited a continuous downward trend compared to that under AT in 2012 and 2013. In 2012, compared to that under AT, the tiller numbers under MT decreased by 43.22%, 27.00%, 24.06%, and 35.78%, respectively, in Shengdao2572, Daliang202, Huaidao11 and Jindao263. These values decreased by 20.05%, 39.53%, 23.07%, and 18.80%, respectively, in 2013.
Fig 2. Dynamics of the tiller occurrence under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013. * = p≤0.05 and NS = nonsignificant.
Above-ground dry matter accumulation traits for rice from old seedlings under MT
As shown in Table 2, the rice dry matter weights (leaf; stem and sheath; and leaf + stem + sheath) at the jointing and booting stages under MT were significantly higher than were those under AT across the two study years, with every variety exhibiting the same change trend. Compared to that under AT, the dry matter weight of the leaf; stem and sheath; and the total above-ground parts at the jointing stage under MT decreased by 31.28%, 17.59% and 25.70% in 2012 and 29.35%, 15.02% and 23.33% in 2013, respectively. Similarly, the corresponding parameters at the booting stage decreased by 24.10%, 18.07% and 21.00% in 2012 and 31.23%, 20.63% and 26.06% in 2013, respectively. In addition, the rice dry matter weights (leaf, stem and sheath, and leaf + stem + sheath + panicle) except for that of the panicle during the heading stages under MT were significantly greater than were those under AT in both years. Unlike the performance of the rice during the above three stages, the dry matter weights of the panicle and the total above-ground parts at maturity exhibited different change tendencies under MT across the two study years. There were obvious varietal differences in the dry matter weight of the leaf, stem and sheath, and panicle, as well as the total above-ground parts, at maturity under MT. In 2012, the difference in the dry matter weight of the leaf between AT and MT was insignificant except for the Shengdao2572 variety. In addition, the dry matter weight of the stem and sheath for Shengdao2572 and Daliang202 significantly decreased, while that of the other varieties did not exhibit a significant change under MT. In 2013, the dry matter weight of the leaf for Daliang202, Huaidao11 and Jindao263 significantly increased under MT, but the opposite occurred for Shengdao2572. For most of the varieties, the dry matter weight of the stem and sheath under MT was not significantly altered excluding Shengdao2572; The dry matter weights of the panicles and the total above-ground parts significantly decreased by 36.79% and 25.69% in 2012 and 29.85% and 19.22% in 2013, respectively.
Table 2. Above-ground-part dry matter weight per tiller in rice at the jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Dry weight at jointing (g tiller-1) | Dry weight at booting (g tiller-1) | Dry weight at heading (g tiller-1) | Dry weight at maturity (g tiller-1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | Leaf | Stem and sheath | Total | Leaf | Stem and sheath | Total | Leaf | Stem and sheath | Panicle | Total | Leaf | Stem and sheath | Panicle | Total |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 0.510a | 0.410a | 0.920a | 0.786a | 0.871a | 1.656a | 0.778a | 0.925a | 0.395a | 2.098a | 0.436a | 0.868a | 1.919a | 3.222a |
| MT | 0.344b | 0.344b | 0.687b | 0.502b | 0.588b | 1.091b | 0.482b | 0.719b | 0.263b | 1.464b | 0.346b | 0.703b | 1.117b | 2.165b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 0.469a | 0.380a | 0.849a | 0.879a | 0.759a | 1.638a | 0.886a | 1.064a | 0.253a | 2.202a | 0.525a | 0.939a | 2.013a | 3.478a | |
| MT | 0.415b | 0.282b | 0.697b | 0.645b | 0.561b | 1.206b | 0.694b | 0.879b | 0.319a | 1.893b | 0.521a | 0.806b | 1.241b | 2.568b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 0.636a | 0.427a | 1.063a | 0.850a | 0.928a | 1.778a | 0.884a | 1.089a | 0.370a | 2.343a | 0.562a | 0.965a | 2.332a | 3.859a | |
| MT | 0.454b | 0.386b | 0.840b | 0.705b | 0.864b | 1.569b | 0.657b | 0.984b | 0.359a | 2.000b | 0.547a | 0.912a | 1.575b | 3.034b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 0.821a | 0.466a | 1.288a | 0.767a | 0.862a | 1.629a | 0.804a | 1.234a | 0.361a | 2.399a | 0.484a | 1.102a | 2.489a | 4.076a | |
| MT | 0.461b | 0.375b | 0.837b | 0.639b | 0.789b | 1.428b | 0.728b | 1.099b | 0.356a | 2.182b | 0.440a | 1.067a | 1.600b | 3.108b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 0.603a | 0.496a | 1.099a | 0.703a | 0.681a | 1.384a | 0.677a | 0.833a | 0.366a | 1.876a | 0.386a | 0.784a | 1.685a | 2.855a |
| MT | 0.386b | 0.474b | 0.861b | 0.426b | 0.448b | 0.874b | 0.353b | 0.506b | 0.182b | 1.040b | 0.259b | 0.495b | 0.899b | 1.652b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 0.575a | 0.448a | 1.023a | 0.831a | 0.666a | 1.497a | 0.792a | 0.938a | 0.293a | 2.023a | 0.348b | 0.825a | 1.799a | 2.971a | |
| MT | 0.375b | 0.316b | 0.690b | 0.545b | 0.536b | 1.081b | 0.691b | 0.873b | 0.326a | 1.891b | 0.432a | 0.793a | 1.229b | 2.454b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 0.535a | 0.372a | 0.907a | 0.772a | 0.747a | 1.518a | 0.677a | 0.985a | 0.296a | 1.958a | 0.431b | 0.879a | 2.135a | 3.444a | |
| MT | 0.471b | 0.348b | 0.819b | 0.523b | 0.626b | 1.149b | 0.613b | 0.921b | 0.319a | 1.853b | 0.532a | 0.884a | 1.721b | 3.138b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 0.662a | 0.402a | 1.064a | 0.867a | 0.921a | 1.788a | 0.683a | 0.950a | 0.270a | 1.903a | 0.436b | 0.885a | 2.180a | 3.501a | |
| MT | 0.446b | 0.322b | 0.768b | 0.688b | 0.783b | 1.471b | 0.616b | 0.873b | 0.295a | 1.784b | 0.593a | 0.858a | 1.622b | 3.073b | ||
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
For every variety, the dry matter accumulation amounts of the rice population under MT were significantly lower than were those under AT across the two study years. Compared to those under AT, the dry matter accumulation amounts of the rice population under MT significantly decreased by 29.62% and 40.27% from the jointing to the booting stage, 50.69% and 35.42% from the booting to the heading stage, and 47.59% and 37.11% from the heading to the maturity stage, respectively, in 2012 and 2013 (Table 3).
Table 3. Dry matter accumulative amount of rice population based on three growth stages (from jointing to booting, booting to heading and heading to maturity) under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| From jointing to booting stage | From booting to heading stage | From heading to maturity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | Dry matter accumulation (t hm-2) | Dry matter accumulation (t hm-2) | Dry matter accumulation (t hm-2) |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 1.807a | 2.426a | 4.202a |
| MT | 0.971b | 0.745b | 2.108b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 1.276a | 2.842a | 4.334a | |
| MT | 0.674b | 1.651b | 2.834b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 3.449a | 3.537a | 5.237a | |
| MT | 2.984b | 1.213b | 2.672b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 3.524a | 4.317a | 6.425a | |
| MT | 2.448b | 2.861b | 2.972b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 2.292a | 1.507a | 3.742a |
| MT | 0.614b | 0.299b | 2.079b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 2.075a | 2.596a | 3.956a | |
| MT | 1.141b | 2.108b | 2.667b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 2.448a | 2.666a | 4.130a | |
| MT | 1.475b | 2.068b | 2.620b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 5.054a | 1.051a | 3.654a | |
| MT | 3.860b | 0.575b | 2.371b |
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
Above-ground dry matter remobilization and distribution characteristics for rice from old seedlings under MT
Compared to those under AT, the leaf dry matter remobilization amount, efficiency and contribution to the grain yield under MT significantly decreased by 55.66%, 38.60% and 29.46% in 2012 and 53.63%, 44.23% and 31.43% in 2013, respectively. The dry matter remobilization amount and the efficiency of the stem and sheath under MT markedly decreased by 55.85% and 57.31% in 2012 and 47.82% and 52.38% in 2013, respectively, compared to those under AT. In terms of the dry matter contribution to the grain of the stem and sheath, the difference between the AT and MT varied with the varieties due to the different genotypes. In 2012, the dry matter contribution of the stem and sheath for Shengdao2572 and Jindao263 under MT significantly decreased, while there was no significant difference between AT and MT for Daliang202 and Huaidao11. In 2013 under MT, this value significantly decreased for most of the varieties excluding Daliang202 (Table 4).
Table 4. Above-ground dry matter remobilization characteristics of rice under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Leaf | Stem and sheath | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | Dry matter remobilization amount (g) | Dry matter remobilization efficiency (%) | Dry matter contribution to grain yield (%) | Dry matter remobilization amount (g) | Dry matter remobilization efficiency (%) | Dry matter contribution to grain yield (%) |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 0.342a | 44.0a | 17.9a | 0.0578a | 6.251a | 3.022a |
| MT | 0.137b | 28.5b | 12.2b | 0.0166b | 2.336b | 1.489b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 0.360a | 40.8a | 18.0a | 0.1248a | 11.715a | 6.229a | |
| MT | 0.173b | 25.0b | 14.0b | 0.0734b | 8.343b | 5.973a | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 0.322a | 36.4a | 13.9a | 0.1240a | 11.403a | 5.347a | |
| MT | 0.110b | 16.8b | 7.1b | 0.0717b | 7.260b | 4.558a | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 0.320a | 39.7a | 13.0a | 0.1317a | 10.560a | 5.274a | |
| MT | 0.176b | 28.5b | 11.0b | 0.0318b | 2.895b | 1.980b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 0.291a | 43.1a | 17.4a | 0.049a | 5.9a | 2.9a |
| MT | 0.094b | 26.4b | 10.4b | 0.011b | 2.1b | 1.2b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 0.444a | 56.1a | 24.7a | 0.113a | 12.1a | 6.4a | |
| MT | 0.259b | 37.5b | 21.1b | 0.081b | 9.2b | 6.6a | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 0.246a | 36.3a | 11.5a | 0.107a | 10.8a | 5.0a | |
| MT | 0.081b | 13.2b | 4.7b | 0.036b | 3.9b | 2.1b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 0.246a | 36.1a | 11.3a | 0.066a | 6.9a | 3.0a | |
| MT | 0.135b | 18.6b | 8.3b | 0.015b | 1.8b | 0.9b | ||
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
The change trends of the ratios of the leaf, stem and sheath, and panicle dry matter weight to the total weight at the heading stage under MT were different from those under AT across the two study years. The ratio of the leaf dry matter weight to the total weight under MT markedly decreased by 15.13% except for cultivar Jindao263 in 2012, while it decreased by 6.25% except for in Huaidao11 and Jindao263 in 2013. In 2012, the ratio of the dry matter weight of the stem and sheath to the total weight significantly decreased in Shengdao2572 and Huaidao11 under MT but not in the other varieties. However, this difference was insignificant between AT and MT for most of the cultivars in 2013. In 2012, the ratio of the panicle dry matter weight to the total weight under MT significantly increased in Daliang202 and Huaidao11 but showed little change in the other two cultivars. In 2013, this ratio significantly increased in Daliang202, Huaidao11 and Jindao263, while the opposite occurred in Shengdao2572. Compared to AT, the ratios of the leaf, and stem and sheath dry matter weight to the total weight in every variety at maturity under MT significantly increased by 19.56% and 17.52% in 2012 and 27.63% and 10.31% in 2013, respectively. In contrast, the ratio of panicle dry matter weight to the total weight under MT markedly decreased by 15.03% and 12.93% in 2012 and 2013, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5. Above-ground dry matter distribution of rice under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Ratio of the dry weight of the leaf to the total dry weight (%) | Ratio of the dry weight of the stem and sheath to the total dry weight (%) | Ratio of dry weight of the panicle to the total dry weight (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | heading stage | Maturity stage | heading stage | Maturity stage | Heading stage | Maturity stage |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 37.1a | 13.5b | 44.1b | 26.9b | 18.8a | 59.5a |
| MT | 33.0b | 16.0a | 49.1a | 32.4a | 17.9a | 51.6b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 40.2a | 15.1b | 48.4a | 27.0b | 11.4b | 57.9a | |
| MT | 31.7b | 20.3a | 46.5b | 31.5a | 16.9a | 48.2b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 37.7a | 14.6b | 46.5b | 25.0b | 15.8b | 60.4a | |
| MT | 32.9b | 18.1a | 49.2a | 30.2a | 17.9a | 51.7b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 33.6a | 11.9b | 51.4a | 27.0b | 14.9a | 61.1a | |
| MT | 33.3a | 14.1a | 50.4a | 34.3a | 16.3a | 51.5b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 36.1a | 13.5b | 44.4b | 27.5b | 19.5a | 59.0a |
| MT | 33.9b | 15.6a | 48.4a | 29.9a | 17.3b | 54.5b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 39.1a | 11.8b | 46.4a | 27.8b | 14.5b | 60.4a | |
| MT | 36.6b | 17.6a | 46.2a | 32.3a | 17.3a | 50.1b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 34.6a | 12.5b | 50.3a | 25.5b | 15.1b | 62.0a | |
| MT | 33.1a | 17.0a | 49.7a | 28.2a | 17.2a | 54.8b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 35.9a | 12.5b | 49.9a | 25.3b | 14.2b | 62.2a | |
| MT | 34.5a | 19.3a | 49.0a | 27.9a | 16.5a | 52.7b | ||
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
Population photosynthetic ability and growth rate for rice from old seedlings under MT
Compared to that under AT, leaf area index at the jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages under MT significantly decreased by 48.05%, 35.36%, 37.11% and 58.01% in 2012 and 48.55%, 35.76%, 32.58% and 57.54% in 2013, respectively; The reduction rate of the leaf area from heading to maturity under MT significantly decreased by 10.35% in 2012 and 7.92% in 2013, respectively. In 2012, the photosynthetic potential and crop growth rate under MT significantly decreased by 43.31% and 25.49% from jointing to booting, 51.81% and 34.51% from booting to heading, and 47.06% and 46.66% from heading to maturity. In 2013, these values were 40.07% and 39.78% from jointing to booting, 37.52% and 35.92% from booting to heading, and 42.18% and 37.17% from heading to maturity, respectively (Table 6).
Table 6. Leaf area index, reduction rate of the leaf area, photosynthetic potential and crop growth rate of rice under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Leaf area index | Reduction rate of leaf area (LAI d-1) | Photosynthetic potential (m2 d) | Crop growth rate (g m-2 d-1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation pattern | Jointing | Booting | Heading | Maturity | from heading to maturity | From jointing to booting | From booting to heading | From heading to maturity | From jointing to booting | From booting to heading | From heading to maturity |
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 4.015a | 6.529a | 6.389a | 3.933a | 0.052b | 57.991a | 64.593a | 242.604a | 16.419a | 24.252a | 8.936a |
| MT | 2.204b | 4.152b | 4.140b | 1.711b | 0.057a | 34.960b | 33.168b | 125.806b | 8.819b | 9.306b | 4.899b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 4.558a | 6.160a | 7.203a | 4.392a | 0.057b | 69.669a | 66.815a | 284.082a | 9.812a | 28.405a | 8.841a | |
| MT | 2.338b | 4.251b | 4.749b | 2.032b | 0.062a | 46.124b | 31.502b | 149.199b | 4.809b | 23.580b | 6.276b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 5.137a | 6.661a | 7.250a | 5.221a | 0.046b | 82.582a | 76.506a | 274.341a | 24.623a | 32.133a | 11.897a | |
| MT | 2.425b | 4.052b | 4.144b | 1.798b | 0.051a | 42.100b | 32.784b | 136.672b | 22.941b | 15.155b | 5.806b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 5.632a | 7.949a | 7.775a | 5.616a | 0.048b | 101.857a | 78.618a | 301.296a | 23.484a | 43.144a | 14.270a | |
| MT | 3.081b | 5.190b | 4.965b | 2.506b | 0.054a | 53.762b | 40.621b | 171.844b | 18.824b | 35.746b | 6.458b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 3.725a | 5.849a | 5.579a | 3.333a | 0.047b | 38.296a | 51.426a | 213.890a | 22.913a | 16.740a | 7.791a |
| MT | 1.977b | 3.836b | 3.856b | 1.396b | 0.052a | 29.068b | 34.614b | 123.417b | 6.132b | 3.321b | 4.421b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 4.815a | 7.559a | 7.226a | 4.765a | 0.052b | 61.869a | 59.299a | 288.741a | 20.742a | 32.437a | 8.238a | |
| MT | 1.962b | 4.778b | 4.531b | 1.847b | 0.056a | 37.069b | 41.891b | 153.073b | 10.370b | 23.404b | 5.553b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 5.075a | 6.953a | 6.282a | 3.826a | 0.051b | 66.156a | 66.174a | 242.593a | 22.241a | 26.647a | 8.599a | |
| MT | 3.108b | 4.127b | 4.168b | 1.522b | 0.054a | 32.556b | 29.030b | 139.392b | 16.381b | 22.965b | 5.344b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 5.239a | 7.195a | 6.718a | 4.193a | 0.052b | 74.605a | 62.610a | 267.321a | 42.093a | 11.675a | 7.452a | |
| MT | 2.654b | 4.961b | 4.843b | 2.078b | 0.056a | 45.691b | 44.119b | 169.566b | 32.153b | 6.381b | 4.837b | ||
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
Performance of the agronomic traits and grain yield for rice from old seedlings under MT
As shown in Fig 3, a significant difference in the plant height at maturity between AT and MT was found. Except for cultivar Huaidao11, the plant height for the other cultivars under MT was 8.79% less than that under AT in 2012. Similarly, the plant height significantly decreased by 9.85% in 2013.
Fig 3. Rice plant height at maturity under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
Compared to AT, there was a significant decrease in the panicle length under MT in 2013; however, the difference between both of the treatments was not significant except for that in cultivar Shengdao2572 in 2012. The number of primary branches per panicle markedly decreased by 11.12% and 15.65% under MT, except for Huaidao11 in 2012 and Daliang202 and Huaidao11 in 2013. Under MT, the number of the secondary branches per panicle significantly decreased by 36.10% and 27.56%, excluding Shengdao2572 and Huaidao11 in 2012 and Huaidao11 in 2013. In 2012, the seed-setting rate markedly decreased except for that in Daliang202 under MT compared to that under AT. Nevertheless, no significant difference between the two treatments was observed except for in Shengdao2572 in 2013. There was a difference in the 1000-grain weight among the cultivars and study years between AT and MT. In 2012, the 1000-grain weight of Shengdao2572 under MT significantly decreased, while the opposite occurred for Jindao263, with little alteration being found in Daliang202 and Huaidao11. In 2013, the 1000-grain weight significantly increased under MT in Shengdao2572 and Jindao263 but not in the other two cultivars. The effective panicles per mm2, total grains per panicle (except Huaidao11) and grain yield significantly decreased by 28.97%, 18.34% and 31.26%, respectively, in both of the study years (Table 7).
Table 7. Agronomic traits of the panicle, grain yield and yield components in rice under AT and MT in 2012 and 2013.
| Year | Cultivar | Cultivation Pattern | Panicle length (cm) | No.of the primary branch per panicle | No. of the secondary branch per panicle | No. of effective panicles m-2 | No. of total grainspanicle-1 | Seed-setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) | Grain yield(kg m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 16.45a | 10.73a | 19.57a | 380.80a | 98.13a | 0.89a | 26.72a | 0.66a |
| MT | 14.64b | 9.70b | 17.17a | 265.72b | 78.45b | 0.77b | 25.73b | 0.46b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 16.02a | 12.30a | 26.82a | 438.76a | 120.96a | 0.93a | 25.97a | 0.97a | |
| MT | 15.89a | 10.93b | 17.70b | 358.68b | 95.45b | 0.90a | 26.50a | 0.62b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 16.26a | 11.51a | 17.36a | 396.76a | 109.94a | 0.91a | 27.20a | 1.10a | |
| MT | 16.40a | 11.50a | 17.90a | 242.76b | 106.79a | 0.77b | 27.37a | 0.60b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 16.09a | 12.31a | 20.71a | 620.76a | 110.82a | 0.95a | 25.55b | 1.17a | |
| MT | 16.40a | 10.78b | 12.67b | 294.00b | 99.99b | 0.84b | 27.27a | 0.80b | ||
| 2013 | Shengdao2572 | AT | 18.23a | 11.67a | 22.39a | 346.92a | 131.11a | 0.78a | 23.64b | 0.80a |
| MT | 16.65b | 10.55b | 19.40b | 263.76b | 109.00b | 0.73b | 27.12a | 0.43b | ||
| Daliang202 | AT | 17.14a | 11.67a | 25.90a | 399.00a | 118.27a | 0.90a | 25.69a | 1.25a | |
| MT | 14.75b | 11.10a | 18.91b | 317.24b | 105.86b | 0.93a | 25.68a | 0.93b | ||
| Huaidao11 | AT | 17.97a | 11.43a | 21.00a | 406.00a | 120.61a | 0.91a | 28.29a | 0.94a | |
| MT | 16.60b | 10.72a | 21.20a | 284.76b | 123.78a | 0.90a | 27.46b | 0.82b | ||
| Jindao263 | AT | 17.85a | 12.93a | 23.37a | 426.16a | 145.28a | 0.89a | 26.50b | 1.14a | |
| MT | 15.57b | 10.20b | 13.60b | 399.00b | 102.93b | 0.87a | 27.15a | 0.86b |
Values of AT and MT for the same cultivar followed by different letters represent significant difference at p≤0.05 level.
Relationships between the grain yield and dry matter production, remobilization and distribution characteristics
There existed a significant and positive correlation between the dry matter weight per tiller at the jointing-maturity stage, the population photosynthetic potential, the crop growth rate, the dry matter remobilization efficiency at the heading-maturity stage, the panicle dry matter distribution ratio at maturity and the grain yield. Furthermore, there was a significant and negative correlation between the leaf dry matter distribution ratio and the stem and sheath dry matter distribution ratio and grain yield. These relationships were well simulated by linear equations, which were presented in both of the study years (Fig 4).
Fig 4. Relationship between grain yield and the dry matter per tiller, the photosynthetic potential of the population, the crop growth rate, the dry matter remobilization efficiency and the above-ground dry matter distribution ratio at maturity.
Discussion
Delayed rice growth stages under MT compared to under AT were previously reported by Huo [19], who demonstrated that the rice-jointing, heading and maturity stages were delayed by 5–8 d, 2–3 d, and 1–2 d, respectively, when the rice seedlings were transplanted at the optimum seedling age (approximately 20 d). This study demonstrates that, compared to those under AT, rice jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages were remarkably delayed by 8–12 d, 6–13 d, 5–9 d and 5–6 d under MT in 2012, respectively, while they only had a marginal change in magnitude with a delay of 2–7 d under MT in 2013. The difference between both of the study years can be explained as higher air temperature during rice growth in 2013, especially from the booting stage to the heading stage (Table 1 and Fig 1). The delayed rice growth under MT may be attributable to the deleterious effects on the roots of mechanical transplantation. In general, it takes rice plants approximately 10–14 d to recover from injury. The age of the seedlings at transplantation significantly affects the number of productive tillers [20]. When rice seedlings are transplanted at the right time in terms of age, tillering and growth proceed normally [21]. The occurrence of tillering for rice with 20-d-old seedlings under MT commenced from the third leaf position after the seedlings were moved into a paddy field, and the peak number of tillers was much greater under MT than that under AT [22]. In contrast to those under AT, the rice tillers under MT occurred 7–10 d later but increased more rapidly once normal growth resumed after being transplanted [22]. In the experiment, the occurrence of rice tiller under MT began almost from the 12th day after being transplanted. It is noteworthy that the maximum and increasing rates of rice tillers under MT were markedly smaller than were those under AT, which is inconsistent with the report of Li [22]. This contradiction may be ascribed to the intensive competition among individual seedlings under the limited growth conditions of the seed-nursery bed under MT, which lasts longer for old seedlings than that for normal seedlings with optimum seedling age [21]. As a result, the tiller occurrence in rice from old seedlings under MT was severely hampered by the delay in transplantation, i.e., the later the rice seedlings were transplanted by machine, the more severely was hindered the rice tiller growth.
The above-ground dry matter weights per tiller and population are pivotal parameters reflecting the growth potential of individuals and populations of rice. The population dry matter weight is determined by the tiller number and dry matter accumulative amount per tiller. Therefore, realizing the growth potential of individuals is beneficial to the improvement of the ability to produce dry matter for the rice population. A previous study reported that the dry matter weight per tiller for mechanically transplanted 20-d-old rice seedlings was 13.15%, 7.73%, 8.77% and 10.84% lower than that of rice that was transplanted by hand at the jointing, booting, heading and maturity stages, respectively [24]. In terms of the dry matter accumulative amount of the population, significant differences between MT and AT were detected, with the former being 6.95% and 11.00% lower than the latter from jointing to heading and from heading to maturity [23]. In the present study, the dry matter weight of the leaf or the stem and sheath from jointing to maturity as well as that of the panicle from heading to maturity in rice (seedling age 42 d) under MT significantly declined compared to that under AT. In addition, a similar tendency also occurred in the dry matter accumulative amount of the rice population from jointing to booting, from booting to heading and from heading to maturity (Tables 1 and 2), which seems to be similar to the reported results [23]. Nevertheless, the differences between AT and MT expanded in our study compared to those in the above-mentioned report, suggesting that the growth and development of rice plants under MT was evidently retarded with the delayed transplantation.
In general, rice grain-filling matter consists of nonstructural carbohydrates that are stored in the stem, sheath and leaves pre-anthesis and of photosynthetic products created mainly by leaves post-anthesis, with the former accounting for nearly 30% [23]. Regarding the rice plants that were transplanted by machine at a 20-d seedling age, the dry matter remobilization amount and efficiency and the contribution rate to the leaf yield decreased by 21.41%, 13.16% and 14.35%, respectively, whereas these values increased by 11.06%, 20.48% and 21.16% for the stem and sheath compared to rice plants that were transplanted by hand [23]. According to the data of the present study, under MT, the above-mentioned parameters (except for the contribution rate to the yield for the stem and sheath) were significantly lower than were those under AT (Table 4). These results indicate that the supply of photosynthetic assimilates from source (leaf + stem and sheath) to sink (grain) is lowered for rice plants from old seedlings under MT, which may be linked to decreased sink capacity (Table 7). The photosynthetic potential is a key index representing the photosynthesis productivity of the crop population, which depends on both the leaf index and the duration of leaf photosynthesis [25]. The growth rate of a crop population, a parameter embodying the dry matter production per day, describes the efficiency of photosynthesis productivity [26]. Our results demonstrate that, in contrast to those under AT, the rice photosynthetic potential and the population growth rate at the jointing-heading and heading-maturity stages significantly decreased under MT (Table 6). The differences between AT and MT are greater than those that were reported by Li [23], who found that under MT, the rice (20-d seedling age) photosynthetic potential at every growth stage was 11.19% lower than that under AT, while the population growth rate was slightly lower than that under AT from the jointing to the heading stage (with a significant decrease only from heading to maturity). One possible explanation for the difference in these agronomic traits between AT and MT is the shortage of vegetative growth due to the inhibited growth in the nursery bed and the postponed recovery from mechanical transplantation injury for mechanically transplanted rice, which was also evidenced by the decreased plant height and tiller occurrence (Figs 2 and 3). Furthermore, if the rice plants are mechanically transplanted after the appropriate seedling age, the vegetative growth duration of rice is further shortened due mainly to the longer growth inhibition in the nursery bed, which demonstrates that the development of the tiller, the photosynthetic production and the assimilate remobilization efficiency in rice from old seedlings are severely impaired. These speculations demonstrate that the above-ground characteristics of rice plants after transplanting varied with seedling age.
Seedling age is an important element affecting the number of filled grains per panicle, the panicle length, the 1000-grain weight and the grain yield in rice, as reported by Ginigaddara [20]. The timely transplantation and appropriate seedling age are essential for producing a higher grain yield, while the seedling age depends on many factors, including crop rotation, climate condition, etc., and might be different in different production systems [27,28,29,30]. Li [23] reported that, when rice plants were mechanically transplanted at a 20-d seedling age, the grain yield markedly decreased by 4.66% compared to that under AT. However, in the present study, the rice (42-d seedling age) grain yield under MT was 31.26% lower than that of AT (Table 7). These results indicate that delaying transplanting has a significant negative influence on the rice grain yield under MT. In addition, our results indicate that the number of effective panicles per m2 under MT significantly decreased compared to that under AT, and a similar trend was observed in the number of primary and secondary branches and the total grains per panicle (except for in the cultivar Huaidao11) (Table 7). The significant decrease in the number of effective panicles is largely attributed to poorer tiller occurrence under MT (Fig 2). Therefore, we argue that the significant reduction in the number of effective panicles and filled grains per panicle is the direct cause of the decreased grain yield under MT. This study reported that high-yielding rice was characterized by great population dry matter weight and photosynthetic potential and a slowed leaf-area reduction rate. After the heading stage, transferring more photosynthetic product from being stored in the leaf, stem and sheath to the panicle allows rice to obtain a high grain yield; in other words, a higher dry matter distribution ratio of the panicle is instrumental in increasing the grain yield. Our results indicate that dry matter weight per tiller at the jointing-maturity stage, the population photosynthetic potential, the crop growth rate, the dry matter remobilization efficiency and the panicle dry matter distribution ratio are significantly and positively correlated with grain yield, while the leaf dry matter distribution ratio and the stem and sheath dry matter distribution ratio are significantly and negatively related with the grain yield (Fig 4). Therefore, we speculate that the decreased photosynthetic potential, population growth rate, dry matter accumulative amount, dry matter distribution ratio of the panicle and accelerated reduction of the leaf area are important physiological factors in the decreased rice grain yield under MT. Interestingly, compared to that under AT, the 1000-grain weight of cultivar Jindao263 under MT significantly increased irrespective of the impaired photosynthetic productivity and assimilate supply. Presumably, the sink capacity (effective panicles and filled grains) decreases more than does the source supply (photosynthetic productivity); in other words, the source-sink ratio increases, thereby leading to an increased grain weight in Jindao263.
Compared with AT, the tiller numbers, dry matter weight, dry matter accumulation, LAI, growth rate, photosynthetic potential, dry matter remobilization efficiency of leaf under MT were significantly decreased under MT. Those agronomic traits above are attributed to grain yield reduced under MT. Taken together, delaying transplanting severely restricted rice growth and grain yield under MT in the Huanghuai region of China. Consequently, it is crucial to adopt effective measurements to mitigate the phenomenon. Firstly, altering the settings of the transplantation machine to lessen damage during transplantation may be an alternative in shortening resuming growth period and expediting rice seedling tillering. Secondly, lowering sowing density could decrease the competition among plant individuals in nursery bed and improve rice seedling quality. Improving the settings of the transplantation machine could match the lowered sowing density. Thirdly, screening varieties with relative insensitivity to delaying transplanting and consistent performance in yield traits may be also an effective channel.
Conclusions
This investigation indicates that using old rice seedlings would result in postponed growth stages, poor tiller occurrence, limited dry matter accumulation and lower population growth rate, photosynthetic potential, and grain yield under MT. Compared to those under AT, the tiller number, population photosynthetic productivity, and dry matter remobilization efficiency significantly decreased under MT due primarily to the obviously short vegetative growth duration, which is the main physiological reason for the decreased grain yield. The significant decreases in the filled grains per panicle and in the number of effective panicles in particular directly led to a decreased rice grain yield, especially that of effective panicles.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1. Cheng SH, Fang FP (2012) Report on rice industry development in China Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing, pp. 149–150. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Thomas EV (2002) Development of a mechanism for transplanting rice seedlings. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 37, 395–410. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Knight J, Deng Q, Li S (2011) The puzzle of migrant labour shortage and rural labour surplus in China. China Econ Rev., 22, 585–600. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Han X, Chen J (2011) An analysis on rural labor transfprmation in Shandong province. Northern Econ. Trade 3, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang X, Herzfeld T, Glauben T (2007) Labor allocation in transition: evidence from Chinese rural households. China Econ. Rev. 18, 287–308. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shafiq M (2007) Household schooling and child labor decisions on rural Bangladesh. J. Asian Econ. 18, 946–966. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Laszlo S (2008) Education, labor supply, and market development in rural Peru. World Develop. 36, 2421–2439. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Takahiro I (2009) Caste discrimination and transaction costs in the labor market: evidence from rural North India. J. Develop. Econ. 88, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Park HK, Kim SS, Choi WY, Lee KS, Lee JK (2002) Effects of continuous cultivation years on soil properties, weed occurrence, and rice yield in no-tillage machine transplanting and direct dry-seeding culture of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 47, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hemmat A, Taki O (2003) Comparison of compaction and puddling as pre-planting soil preparation for mechanized rice transplanting in very gravelly calcisols in central Iran. Soil Till Res. 70, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Choi WY, Moon SH, Park HK, Choi MG, Kim SS, Kim CK (2006) Optimum planting density in low fertilizing culture of machine transplanting in rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51, 379–385. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kobayashi K, Takahashi Y, Fukuyama T (2009) Studies on the seedling raising method in giant-embryo rice cultivar ‘Koshiguruma’ and its adaptability to machine transplanting. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 78, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang ZJ, Wang J, Lang YZ, Yu LH, Xue YF, Zhu QS (2008) Growing characteristics of rice seedlings of over-optimum age for mechanical transplanting. Acta Agron. Sin. 34, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chahal GBS, Sood A, Jalota SK, Choudhury BU, Sharma PK (2007) Yield, evapotranspiration and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in Punjab (India) as influenced by transplanting date of rice and weather parameters. Agric. Water Manage. 88, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Takahashi Y, Yoshida T (2007) Studies on delaying the transplanting time of paddy rice cultivar “Asahi-yume” after wheat cropping in Tomo area of Gunma Prefecture. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 76, 355–361. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yu LH, Ding YF, Xue YF, Ling QH, Yuan ZH (2006) Factors affecting rice seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice. Transactions of the CSAE. 22, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ntanos DA, Koutroubas (2002) Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for indica and japonica rice under mediterranean conditions. Field crops Res. 74, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Xiong J, Ding CQ, Wei GB, Ding YF, Wang SH (2013) Characteristic of dry-matter accumulation and nitrogen-uptake of super-high-yielding early rice in China. Agron. J. 105, 1142–1150. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Huo ZY, Li J, Zhang HC, Dai QG, Xu K, Wei HY, et al. (2012) Characterization of nitrogen uptake and utilization in rice under different planting methods. Acta Agron. Sin. 38, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ginigaddara GAS, Ranamukhaarachchi SL (2011) Study of age of seedlings at transplanting on growth dynamics and yield of rice under alternating flooding and suspension of irrigation of water management. Recent Res in Sci and Tech. 3, 76–88. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mobasser HR, Tari DB, Vojdani M, Abadi RS, Eftekhari A (2007) Effect of seedling age and planting space on yield and yield compents of rice (Neda Varietr). Asian J Plant Sci. 6, 438–440. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Li J, Zhang HC, Gong JL, Chang Y, Wu GC, Guo ZH, et al. (2011) Tillering characteristics and its relationship with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas. Acta Agron. Sin. 37, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Li J, Zhang HC, Chang Y, Gong JL, Guo ZH, Dai QG, et al. (2011) Characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of rice with different planting methods under high-yielding cultivation condition. Acta Agron. Sin. 37, 1235–1248. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cock JH, Yoshida S (1972) Accumulation of 14C labeled carbohydrate before flowering and the subsequent redistribution in the rice plant. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 41, 226–234. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Katsura K, Maeda S, Horie T, Shiraiwa T (2007) Analysis of yield attributes and crop physiological traits of Liangyoupeijiu, a hybrid rice recently bred in China. Field Crops Res. 103, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Takai T, Matsuura S, Nishio T, Ohsumi A, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2006) Rice yield potemtial is closely related to crop growth rate during late reproductive period. Field Crops Res. 96, 328–335. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Adhikari BB, Mehera B, Haefele S (2013) Impact of rice nursery nutrient management, seeding density and seedling age on yield and yield attributes. American J Plant Sci. 4, 146–155. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sarwar N, Maqsood M, Wajid SA, Anwar-ul-Haq M (2011) Impact of nursery seeding density, nitrogen, and seedling age on yield and yield attributes of fine rice. Chilean J Agricul Res. 71, 343–349. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Brar SK, Mahal SS, Brar AS, Vashist KK, Sharma N, Buttar GS (2012) Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India. Agric. Water Manage. 115, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Thanunathan K, Sivasubramanian V (2002) Age of seedling and crop management practices for high density grain in rice. Crop Res. 24, 421–424. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.