Abstract
Melanoma is difficult to treat when it has metastasized. Discrimination between melanoma and benign nevi in melanocytic lesions is crucial for identifying melanomas and consequently improving melanoma treatment and prognosis. The chromosome segregation 1-like (CSE1L) protein has been implicated in cancer progression and is regulated by phosphorylation by extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling, a critical pathway in melanoma progression. We studied phosphorylated CSE1L expression in human melanoma and benign nevi specimens. Immunohistochemistry with tissue microarray using antibody against phosphorylated CSE1L showed that melanomas exhibited considerable staining for phosphorylated CSE1L (100%, 34/34), whereas the benign nevi showed only faint staining (0%, 0/34). Melanomas mainly exhibited cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L distribution, whereas the benign nevi mainly exhibited nuclear phospho-CSE1L distribution. Moreover, immunohistochemistry with anti-CSE1L antibody revealed that CSE1L mainly exhibited cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution and nuclear distribution was the dominant. Immunofluorescence with B16F10 melanoma cells showed cytoplasmic distribution of phospho-CSE1L and nuclear distribution of CSE1L. Our results indicated that nuclear CSE1L is mainly non-phosphorylated CSE1L and is involved in gene regulation and cytoplasmic CSE1L is mainly phosphorylated CSE1L and is involved in cytoplasmic signaling regulation in melanocytic tumorigenesis. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis of cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L may aid in the diagnosis of melanoma.
Keywords: CSE1L, cytoplasmic, melanoma, nuclear, phospho-CSE1L, phosphorylation
Introduction
Melanomas cause most skin-cancer-related deaths. These malignancies can develop in normal skin or from atypical nevi. Nevi are benign tumors derived from melanocytes, and the risk of the transformation of a common nevus into a melanoma is low. However, the atypical nevi are potential precursors for melanoma. Melanomas are highly invasive, but early-stage melanomas are highly curable; however, advanced-stage and metastatic melanomas are more difficult to treat and are often fatal. Thus, the distinction between melanomas and benign nevi is necessary for identifying melanocytic lesions and consequently melanoma treatment and prognosis for a more satisfactory management [1]. Immunohistochemistry is usually of limited value in the diagnosis and discrimination of melanoma and certain types of nevi, such as atypical Spitz nevi, recurrent melanocytic nevi, and proliferative nodules in congenital nevi [2]. The chromosome segregation 1-like (CSE1L) protein is the human homolog of the yeast chromosome segregation protein CSE1 [3]. Pathological studies have shown that CSE1L is highly expressed in cancer and is associated with advanced stage and poor patient prognosis [4]. A pathological study reported that CSE1L expression predominantly correlated with advanced stages of melanoma [5]. Our recent studies showed that CSE1L is a phosphorylated protein and CSE1L phosphorylation is regulated by Ras-ERK signaling [6,7]. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) is a major downstream transducer of Ras and plays a crucial role in the progression of various cancers including melanoma [8-11]. Thus, phosphorylated CSE1L may be involved in the development of melanomas. In this study, we report that CSE1L mainly exhibited cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution and nuclear distribution was the dominant; phosphorylated CSE1L mainly exhibited cytoplasmic distribution, whereas benign nevi exhibited nuclear phospho-CSE1L distribution. Moreover, phosphorylated CSE1L was significantly stained in melanomas but showed faint staining in benign nevi. Immunohistochemical analysis of phospho-CSE1L expression may be helpful in discriminating melanomas from benign nevi.
Materials and methods
Production of antibodies specific to phosphorylated CSE1L
Non-phosphopeptide LTEYLKKTLDPDPAC and phosphopeptide LTpEYpLKKTLDPDPAC (where Tp denotes phosphothreonine and Yp denotes phosphotyrosine) were synthesized using the solid-phase method. The phosphorylated peptides were conjugated through the N-terminal cysteine thiol to keyhole-limpet hemocyanin (KLH). New Zealand rabbits were immunized five times with the phosphopeptides. The immune serum was collected a week after the final immunization. The IgG fractions were purified using a protein G column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). The antibodies were purified using the phosphorylated peptide affinity column and then through nonphosphopeptide cross-adsorption to remove nonphospho-specific antibodies. The titer and the specificity of the antibodies were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting.
Cells and cell treatments
The procedure for producing B16-Ras cells (B16F10 mouse melanoma cells transfected with a v-H-ras-expressing vector) and B16-dEV cells (B16F10 mouse melanoma cells transfected with control vectors) was as previously described [6]. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 unit/mL of penicillin, 100 mg/mL of streptomycin, and 2 mmol/L glutamate at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cells were maintained in media containing 200 μg/mL of G418. For the experiments, the cells were cultured in media without G418.
Immunoblotting
The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in an ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/mL of aprotinin, and 5 μg/mL of leupeptin] containing phosphatase inhibitors (25 mM β-glycerophosphate and 5 mM sodium fluoride). Protein concentrations were determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK), and immunoblotting was performed using an anti-CSE1L antibody (clone 24, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) or an anti-phospho-CSE1L antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence with a Forte Western horseradish peroxidase substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on coverslips (12 × 12 mm) were cytospun at 1000 rpm for 10 min. The cells were then washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with methanol, and blocked with PBS containing 0.1% BSA. Samples were incubated with anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies or anti-CSE1L antibodies (clone H2) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h. The samples were then washed three times with PBS, followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa Fluor 488. The cells were examined using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M inverted fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Experiments were performed on duplicate coverslips in three independent experiments and 5 random fields were imaged per coverslip.
Patients
The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Changhua Christian Hospital (Changhua, Taiwan) and it adhered to the guidelines approved by the institutional review board of the hospital. Melanoma is relatively rare in Asian populations compared with fair-skinned populations. Melanoma specimens were obtained from 34 consecutive patients who had recently been diagnosed at our hospital. The tumors were graded and categorized according to the Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition) [12]. The study enrolled 20 benign-nevi cases. The patient group comprised 17 men and 17 women, with a mean age of 75.4 years (range: 47-100 years). Twenty patients had ulcers in their tumors. Four, 23, and 7 cases were classified as Clark’s Level III, IV, and V tumors, respectively.
Tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry
Tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry were performed as previously described [13]. For the tissue microarrays, three cores from cancerous tissues and one core from benign nevi in each paraffin block were longitudinally cut and arranged into new paraffin blocks. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 6-μm tissue sections fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin by using a 100-fold dilution of anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies or anti-CSE1L antibodies (clone 3D8, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan). Immunohistochemical detection was performed using a labeled streptavidin-biotin method with a Histostain kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA). The sections were developed using diaminobenzidine, washed with distilled water, and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin.
Statistical analyses
Results of clinicopathological variables were tested using Fisher’s exact test to ascertain whether differences between the groups were statistically significant. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value of < 0.05 (two-tailed test) was considered statistically significant.
Results
Antibodies specific to phosphorylated CSE1L were produced by immunizing New Zealand rabbits with synthetic phosphopeptides designed to correspond to the putative phosphorylation domain of CSE1L. The results of immunoblotting with cell lysates from B16-Ras cells showed that the anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies recognized phosphorylated CSE1L (Figure 1). We then studied phosphorylated CSE1L expression in human melanoma and benign-nevi specimens. We observed that no significant clinical-pathological correlation of phospho-CSE1L expression in melanomas (Table 1). Compared with fair-skinned populations, the occurrence of melanoma is relatively rare in Asian populations. This apparent correlation (no significant clinical-pathological correlation of phospho-CSE1L expression in melanomas) may have been due to the low number of cases in this study. However, we observed a nonsignificant trend, reflecting the relation of phospho-CSE1L expression with ulceration and lymph node metastasis of melanoma (Table 1). Ulceration of a cutaneous melanoma on microscopic sections is an adverse prognostic finding [14]. An analysis of the ulcerated tumors showed that 10 of 15 cases with high phospho-CSE1L expression showed ulcerated tumors (Table 1). In addition, six of seven cases with high phospho-CSE1L expression showed lymph node metastasis (Table 1).
Figure 1.

The anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies react with phosphorylated CSE1L. Characterization of the specificity of the anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies was performed by immunoblotting with equal amounts (50 μg) of cell lysates. Lane 1: cell lysates from serum-starved B16F10 cells. Lane 2: cell lysates from B16F10 cells. Lanes 3 and 4: cell lysates from HT-29 cells. Lanes 5 and 6: cell lysates from serum-starved B16-dEV cells (Lane 5) and B16-Ras cells (Lane 6). The anti-CSE1L antibodies (clone 24) were used as the control.
Table 1.
Clinical-pathological correlation of phosphorylated CSE1L expression in melanomas
| Phospho-CSE1L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| Weak | Strong | Total | P | |
| Sex | ||||
| F | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | 17 | 0.078 |
| M | 4 (23.5) | 13 (76.5) | 17 | |
| Ulcer | ||||
| No | 8 (57.1) | 6 (42.9) | 14 | 0.058 |
| Yes | 5 (205) | 15 (75) | 20 | |
| Clark level | ||||
| III | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 4 | 0.262 |
| IV | 8 (34.8) | 15 (65.2) | 23 | |
| V | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 7 | |
| T status | ||||
| T1, 2 | 4 (50) | 4 (50) | 8 | 0.434 |
| T3, 4 | 9 (34.6) | 17 (65.4) | 26 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| No | 12 (44.4) | 15 (55.6) | 27 | 0.143 |
| Yes | 1 (14.3) | 6 (85.7) | 7 | |
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| No | 10 (41.7) | 14 (58.3) | 24 | 0.524 |
| Yes | 3 (30) | 7 (70) | 10 | |
| Stage | ||||
| I, II | 8 (44.4) | 10 (55.6) | 18 | 0.429 |
| III, IV | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.8) | 16 | |
| Survival (years) | ||||
| ≤ 3 | 7 (31.8) | 15 (68.2) | 22 | 0.297 |
| > 3 | 6 (50) | 6 (50) | 12 | |
| Recurrence | ||||
| No | 10 (38.5) | 16 (61.5) | 26 | 0.961 |
| Yes | 3 (37.5) | 5 (62.5) | 8 | |
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male. P value was calculated using a Pearson chi-square test.
Immunohistochemistry results showed that phospho-CSE1L was faintly stained in benign nevi (0/20) (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical staining indicated that all melanomas (100%, 34/34) exhibited significant positive phospho-CSE1L staining (Figure 3). The finding that cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L was highly expressed in human melanomas but was faintly stained in benign nevi indicated that phospho-CSE1L plays a role in the development of melanoma. Moreover, most of the melanomas mainly exhibited cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L staining, whereas most benign nevi exhibited nuclear phospho-CSE1L staining. The result of immunohistochemical staining with antibody against CSE1L (clone 3D8) revealed that cellular total CSE1L showed both cytoplasmic and nuclear distribution and nuclear distribution was the dominant (Figure 4). In addition, immunofluorescence analysis of the distribution of phospho-CSE1L expression in B16F10 mouse melanoma cells with antibody against phosphorylated CSE1L showed that phospho-CSE1L was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of B16-Ras melanoma cells, whereas CSE1L was mainly distributed in the nucleus as analyzed using anti-CSE1L antibodies (clone H2) (Figure 5). The results indicated that the cytoplasmic distribution of phospho-CSE1L plays a role in the development of melanoma. In addition, analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of phospho-CSE1L may be useful in distinguishing melanomas from benign nevi.
Figure 2.

Representative immunohistochemical images of phospho-CSE1L expression in human nevi. A, B. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. C, D. Phospho-CSE1L staining with antibody against phosphorylated CSE1L. Original magnification: A and C. ×100; B and D. ×400.
Figure 3.

Representative immunohistochemical images of phospho-CSE1L expression in melanomas. A, B. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. C, D. Phospho-CSE1L staining with antibody against phosphorylated CSE1L. Original magnification: A and C. ×100; B and D. ×400.
Figure 4.

Representative immunohistochemical images of CSE1L expression in melanomas. A, B. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. C, D. CSE1L staining with antibody against CSE1L (clone 3D8). Original magnification: A and C. ×100; B and D. ×400.
Figure 5.

Representative micrographs showing phospho-CSE1L distribution in the cytoplasm of B16-Ras cells. Immunofluorescence shows cytoplasmic distribution of phospho-CSE1L analyzed with anti-phospho-CSE1L antibodies and nuclear distribution of CSE1L analyzed with anti-CSE1L antibodies (H2). Bar = 20 μm.
Discussion
The Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling plays a crucial role in melanoma progression [10,11]. Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway was activated in over 80% of cutaneous melanomas [15]. Studies have reported that phospho-ERK expression is significantly higher in primary melanomas than in nevi and that phospho-ERK expression is high in all stages of melanoma [10,11,16]. CSE1L is highly expressed in most cancers and in vitro cell-line studies have reported that CSE1L phosphorylation is regulated by Ras-Raf-ERK signaling [6,7]. The present study showed that melanomas exhibited significant phospho-CSE1L staining, whereas benign nevi exhibited faint staining of phospho-CSE1L (Figures 2 and 3). Because ERK signaling is highly activated in melanomas, our results are consistent with those of in vitro cell-line studies in that ERK signaling and phosphorylated CSE1L might be involved in melanocytic tumorigenesis.
CSE1L has been reported to associate with chromatin and regulates expression of select p53 target genes, thus, nuclear CSE1L can bind select genes with significant functional consequences for p53-mediated transcription and determine cellular outcome [17]. It was also reported that nuclear accumulation of CSE1L may implicate in the nuclear concentration of transcription factors conveying pro-oncogenic signals [18]. High CSE1L nuclear staining was reported to be associated with a lower overall survival rate in bladder urothelial carcinomas [19]. On the other hand, cytoplasmic CSE1L was reported to be correlated with the depth of tumor penetration and cancer stage of colorectal cancer [20]. Cytoplasmic CSE1L was also reported to regulate protrusion extension, microvesicle formation, and was implicated in the migration and invasion of cancer cells [6,7,21]. Our present results showed that melanomas mainly exhibited cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L distribution and CSE1L mainly exhibited cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution and nuclear distribution was the dominant (Figures 3 and 4). These results indicated that nuclear CSE1L was mainly non-phosphorylated CSE1L and was involved in gene regulation and cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L was mainly phosphorylated CSE1L and was involved in cellular tumor progression signaling in melanocytic tumorigenesis.
Standard histopathology is a common method for diagnosing melanocytic tumors; nevertheless, equivocal diagnosis may exist in a subset of cases based on histomorphological features alone [2,22-25]. Representative examples of those cases include atypical Spitz nevi; recurrent melanocytic nevi; melanocytic nevi of the genital, acral, or mammary regions; proliferative nodules in congenital nevi; and recently sun-exposed nevi, in which diagnostic ambiguity of a melanoma and a nevus may arise [26-33]. Misdiagnosing a melanoma as a benign nevus results in insufficient treatment. Conversely, misdiagnosing a benign nevus as a melanoma results in unnecessary skin destruction caused by overly aggressive treatment [34]. Our results showed that most of the melanomas exhibited cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L distribution, whereas the benign nevi mainly exhibited nuclear phospho-CSE1L distribution (Figures 2 and 3). Our results suggested that cytoplasmic phosphorylated CSE1L is associated with melanocytic tumorigenesis and immunohistochemical analysis of cytoplasmic phospho-CSE1L may be helpful in diagnosing microscopically ambiguous cases and facilitate patient-management decisions.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Council (NSC 103-2314-B-038 -023 -MY2).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Rao Q, Wang Y, Xia QY, Shi SS, Shen Q, Tu P, Shi QL, Zhou XJ, Wu B. Cathepsin K in the immunohistochemical diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1132–1139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bauer J, Bastian BC. Distinguishing melanocytic nevi from melanoma by DNA copy number changes: comparative genomic hybridization as a research and diagnostic tool. Dermatol Ther. 2006;19:40–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brinkmann U, Brinkmann E, Gallo M, Pastan I. Cloning and characterization of a cellular apoptosis susceptibility gene, the human homologue to the yeast chromosome segregation gene CSE1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10427–10431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tai CJ, Hsu CH, Shen SC, Lee WR, Jiang MC. Cellular apoptosis susceptibility (CSE1L/CAS) protein in cancer metastasis and chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:110. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Böni R, Wellmann A, Man YG, Hofbauer G, Brinkmann U. Expression of the proliferation and apoptosis-associated CAS protein in benign and malignant cutaneous melanocytic lesions. Am J Dermatopathol. 1999;21:125–128. doi: 10.1097/00000372-199904000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liao CF, Lin SH, Chen HC, Tai CJ, Chang CC, Li LT, Yeh CM, Yeh KT, Chen YC, Hsu TH, Shen SC, Lee WR, Chiou JF, Luo SF, Jiang MC. CSE1L, a novel microvesicle membrane protein, mediates Ras-triggered microvesicle generation and metastasis of tumor cells. Mol Med. 2012;18:1269–1280. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang MC, Yeh CM, Tai CJ, Chen HC, Lin SH, Su TC, Shen SC, Lee WR, Liao CF, Li LT, Lee CH, Chen YC, Yeh KT, Chang CC. CSE1L modulates Ras-induced cancer cell invasion: correlation of K-Ras mutation and CSE1L expression in colorectal cancer progression. Am J Surg. 2013;206:418–427. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cui X, Li S, Li T, Pang X, Zhang S, Jin J, Hu J, Liu C, Yang L, Peng H, Jiang J, Liang W, Suo J, Li F, Chen Y. Significance of elevated ERK expression and its positive correlation with EGFR in Kazakh patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:2382–2391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu G, Qin XQ, Guo JJ, Li TY, Chen JH. AKT/ERK activation is associated with gastric cancer cell resistance to paclitaxel. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1449–1458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yajima I, Kumasaka MY, Thang ND, Goto Y, Takeda K, Yamanoshita O, Iida M, Ohgami N, Tamura H, Kawamoto Y, Kato M. RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling in malignant melanoma progression and therapy. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:354191. doi: 10.1155/2012/354191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oba J, Nakahara T, Abe T, Hagihara A, Moroi Y, Furue M. Expression of c-Kit, p-ERK and cyclin D1 in malignant melanoma: an immunohistochemical study and analysis of prognostic value. J Dermatol Sci. 2011;62:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Balch CM. Melanoma of the Skin. In: Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. New York: Springer Verlag; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin YF, Chang CC, Lin SH, Yeh CM, Su TC, Wu PR, Yeh KT, Jiang MC, Chen PY, Hsu HT. Inverse correlation of phospho-KDR/Flk-1 expression and stage of colorectal cancer: implication of the significance of neoangiogenesis in activated VEGFR-2 expressing early stage colorectal adenocarcinomas. Pol J Pathol. 2014;65:194–201. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2014.45781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Balch CM, Wilkerson JA, Murad TM, Soong SJ, Ingalls AL, Maddox WA. The prognostic significance of ulceration of cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 1980;45:3012–3017. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800615)45:12<3012::aid-cncr2820451223>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang AX, Qi XY. Targeting RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling in metastatic melanoma. IUBMB Life. 2013;65:748–758. doi: 10.1002/iub.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhuang L, Lee CS, Scolyer RA, McCarthy SW, Palmer AA, Zhang XD, Thompson JF, Bron LP, Hersey P. Activation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in human melanoma. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:1163–1169. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.025957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanaka T, Ohkubo S, Tatsuno I, Prives C. hCAS/CSE1L associates with chromatin and regulates expression of select p53 target genes. Cell. 2007;130:638–650. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lorenzato A, Biolatti M, Delogu G, Capobianco G, Farace C, Dessole S, Cossu A, Tanda F, Madeddu R, Olivero M, Di Renzo MF. AKT activation drives the nuclear localization of CSE1L and a pro-oncogenic transcriptional activation in ovarian cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:2627–2636. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chang CC, Tai CJ, Su TC, Shen KH, Lin SH, Yeh CM, Yeh KT, Lin YM, Jiang MC. The prognostic significance of nuclear CSE1L in urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16:362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tai CJ, Su TC, Jiang MC, Chen HC, Shen SC, Lee WR, Liao CF, Chen YC, Lin SH, Li LT, Shen KH, Yeh CM, Yeh KT, Lee CH, Shih HY, Chang CC. Correlations between cytoplasmic CSE1L in neoplastic colorectal glands and depth of tumor penetration and cancer stage. J Transl Med. 2013;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tai CJ, Shen SC, Lee WR, Liao CF, Deng WP, Chiou HY, Hsieh CI, Tung JN, Chen CS, Chiou JF, Li LT, Lin CY, Hsu CH, Jiang MC. Increased cellular apoptosis susceptibility (CSE1L/CAS) protein expression promotes protrusion extension and enhances migration of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:2969–2981. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cook MG. Diagnostic discord with melanoma. J Pathol. 1997;182:247–249. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<247::AID-PATH852>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corona R, Mele A, Amini M, De Rosa G, Coppola G, Piccardi P, Fucci M, Pasquini P, Faraggiana T. Interobserver variability on the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. J. Clin. Oncol. 1996;14:1218–1223. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jackson R. Malignant melanoma: a review of 75 malpractice cases. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:497–498. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kempf W, Haeffner AC, Mueller B, Panizzon RG, Burg G. Experts and gold standards in dermatopathology: qualitative and quantitative analysis of the self-assessment slide seminar at the 17th colloquium of the International Society of Dermatopathology. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998;20:478–482. doi: 10.1097/00000372-199810000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ali L, Helm T, Cheney R, Conroy J, Sait S, Guitart J, Gerami P. Correlating array comparative genomic hybridization findings with histology and outcome in spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010;3:593–599. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barnhill RL, Argenyi ZB, From L, Glass LF, Maize JC, Mihm MC Jr, Rabkin MS, Ronan SG, White WL, Piepkorn M. Atypical Spitz nevi/tumors: lack of consensus for diagnosis, discrimination from melanoma, and prediction of outcome. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:513–520. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90193-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoang MP, Prieto VG, Burchette JL, Shea CR. Recurrent melanocytic nevus: a histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:400–406. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2001.028008400.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clark WH Jr, Hood AF, Tucker MA, Jampel RM. Atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type with a discussion of reciprocal parenchymal-stromal interactions in the biology of neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:S1–S24. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)80028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ackerman AB, Cerroni L, Kerl H. Pitfalls in histopathologic diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scalvenzi M, Palmisano F, Cacciapuoti S, Migliaro F, Siano M, Staibano S, Tornillo L, Costa C. Giant congenital melanocytic naevus with proliferative nodules mimicking congenital malignant melanoma: a case report and review of the literature of congenital melanoma. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2013;2013:473635. doi: 10.1155/2013/473635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Flux K, Hartschuh W. Congenital spindle cell naevus with unusual transformation: proliferative nodule or melanoma? Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:152–155. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tronnier M, Alexander M, Neitmann M, Brinckmann J, Wolff HH. Morphologische veränderungen in melanozytären nävi durch exogene faktoren. Hautarzt. 2000;51:561–566. doi: 10.1007/s001050051172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.LeBoit PE. Stimulants of malignant melanoma: a rogue’s gallery of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic imposters. Pathology. 1994;2:195–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
