Abstract
The expression of CD133 decreases with differentiation of tumor cell, indicating that CD133 is a specific marker for isolation and identification of CSCs. In the present study the effect of Ursolic acid chalcone (UAC) on CD133+ hepatocellular carcinoma cell (HCC CSCs) differentiation, their self-renewal, tumorigenic capacity and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs was studied. The results demonstrated that UAC inhibits the expression of CD133+ in a dose and time-dependent manner in PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 HCC cells. The inhibition was significant at 50 μM and on day 8. The percentage of CD133+ cells decreased from an initial 59.3% in PLC/PRF/5 to 37.1% and 78.2% in Huh7 to 59.2% on treatment with UAC. There was inhibition of Oct4, Tert, Bmi1, β-catenin, ABCG2, and tumor sphere-related gene Ep300. In addition it also decreased number of CK19-positive cells and increased number of CK8/18-positive cells. UAC treatment caused a decrease in self-renewal capability and increase in sensitivity to doxorubicin and vincristine drugs in CD133+ HCC CSCs. Therefore, UAC can be a potent therapeutic agent to target differentiation of CSC in HCC.
Keywords: Self-renewal, therapeutic agent, hepatocellular carcinoma, cell differentiation
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths and fifth most common cancer globally [1,2]. Resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy makes overall survival of HCC patients unsatisfactory [3]. The cancer stem cells (CSC) which are rare in tumors exhibit ability of self-renewal, unlimited proliferation, pluripotency and are responsible for tumor recurrence and distant metastasis [4]. CSCs also have stronger resistance to traditional therapies compared to cancer non-stem cells [5-11]. Functional liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) present in HCC cell lines [12-17] have been isolated using CD133 as a surface maker [14,18].
Initially CD133 was denoted as primitive hematopoietic and neural stem cell marker [19] but latter on its expression was reported in some normal tissues as well [20-22]. Recently CD133 was detected in CSCs of solid tumors such as brain tumors, renal tumors, colon carcinomas and prostate carcinomas [23-26]. The role of CD133 in maintaining stemness of CSCs is demonstrated by decrease in its expression with differentiation of tumor cells [27]. CD133+ HCC cells are reported to have higher in vitro proliferation capacity and tumorigenesis ability [15].
Ursolic acid, a pentacyclic triterpenoid (Figure 1) present in abundance in apple peels [28] suppress tumorigenesis [29], angiogenesis [33] and inhibits tumor promotion [30-32]. Ursolic acid mainly exerts its anti-tumor effect by suppressing the expression of genes regulated by NF-kB [34-40]. Not only ursolic acid but its derivatives also induce apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells [41-47] through DNA replication inhibition [48], caspase activation, [43,45,47] and tyrosine kinases inhibition [44]. In the present study we first time report the inhibition of CD133+ expression in in HCC CSCs by ursolic acid chalcone.
Figure 1.

Structure of Ursolic acid chalcone.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The cell lines PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. HCC cells were distributed in to 6-well plates (NUNC) in serum free chemically defined medium (CDM) for inducing differentiation. CDM comprised of 1:1 mixture of neurobasal medium and DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 0.5 × N2, 0.5 × B27, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 2 mmol/L glutamine, and 0.1 mmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol, growth factors including UAC (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (Millipore), 10 ng/mL EGF (Millipore), 20 ng/mL hepatocyte growth factor (Millipore), 20 ng/mL TGFα (Millipore), and 10 × 7 mol/L dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) were added. For UAC treatment, different amounts of UAC were added to the CDM to reach the indicated final concentration. The agents with no special indication were purchased from the Invitrogen Corporation.
Cell isolation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting or magnetic a ctivated cell sorting
PE-conjugated anti-human CD133/1 antibody (AC133; Miltenyi Biotec) was used to label PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 cells as per the instructions of manufacturer. CD133+ and CD133- cell subpopulations were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The purity of sorted cells was evaluated by flow cytometry, and more than 90% of cells with viability determined by the trypan blue staining were acceptable for the following experiments.
Cell proliferation assay
Three thousand cells were plated in 96-well culture plates for 24 hours and were then treated with different concentrations of UAC for different time durations. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) ELISA assay was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Diagnostics). ELISA reader (Multiskan MK3; Thermo Scientific) was used to measure Optical density (OD) values at 450 nm.
Statistical analysis
All results were presented as the mean ± SD and analyzed using the Student t test. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Inhibition of CD133+ expression in HCC by UAC
The results from Western blotting analysis showed a significant decrease in CD133+ expression in PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7, HCC cell lines on treatment with UAC. We observed a decrease in CD133+ expression in dose and time-dependent manner. CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 HCC cell were treated with a range of UAC concentrations ranging from 10 µM to 100 µM for 10 days. There was a decrease in CD133+ expression at 30 µM but the effect was significant at 50 µM and maximum at 100 µM concentration of UAC (Figure 2A). However, treatment of CD133- cells with UAC could not induce any observable effect. The decrease in CD133 expression in PLC/PRF/5 cells began on day 4 and the expression was minimum on day 8 (Figure 2B). Similar results were obtained in Huh7 cells. Thus UAC causes a decrease in CD133 expression in CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 cells at a concentration of 50 µM and exerts maximum inhibitory effect on day 8. Treatment of CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 cells with UAC at a concentration of 50 µM resulted in inhibition of cell growth (Figure 2C). The percentage of CD133+ cells decreased from an initial 59.3% in PLC/PRF/5 to 37.1%, and 78.2% in Huh7 to 59.2% on treatment with UAC (Figure 2D).
Figure 2.

Decrease in CD133+ CSCs population by UAC in vitro. A. Western blotting for CD133 in PLC/PRF/5 cells on treatment with different doses of UAC. B. UAC induces decrease in CD133 protein in a time-dependent manner. C. Effect of different concentrations of UAC on PLC/PRF/5 cell proliferation (BrdUrd ELISA assay). D. Reduction in percentage of CD133+ cells after UAC treatment (Flow cytometric analysis).
UAC induces differentiation of HCC CSCs
Spheroid formation by cancer cells on suspension in CDM enriches CSCs. The self-renewal capability of these cell populations is indicated by the number and size of the spheres [49]. Treatment of CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cell cultures (in suspension with serum-free medium CDM) with UAC resulted in inhibition of stem cell-associated gene expression. The results from Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analysis showed inhibition of Oct4, Tert, Bmi1, β-catenin, ABCG2, and tumor sphere-related gene Ep300 expression in CD133+ cells (Figure 3A). However in CD133- cells expression of these genes was not affected on UAC treatment.
Figure 3.

Induction of differentiation in HCC CSCs by UAC. A. The stem-ness-related gene expression of in CD133+ and CD133- cells, cultured as spheres in CDM or in a monolayer with UAC treatment. B. Western blotting shows that UAC enhances CK8/18 expression and decreases CK19 expression in a time dependent manner.
Treatment of CD133+ CSCs with UAC led to inhibition of CK19 expression in a time dependent manner (Figure 3B). Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) has key role in HCC aggressiveness and acts as a marker for biliary epithelial cells [50]. On the other hand, UAC treatment induced a time-dependent enhancement of CK8/18 expression in the CD133+ CSCs (Figure 3B). CK8/18 are hepatocyte-specific markers [51]. However, no effect of UAC treatment was observed on the expression of CK19 and CK8/18 for 8 days in CD133- cells.
Inhibition of self-renewal and tumorigenic capacity of HCC CSCs by UAC
Treatment of CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cell cultures (in CDM suspension) with UAC resulted in lower colony formation efficiency (CFE) in CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cells on day 8 (Figure 4A). However no effect of UAC was observed on CFE in CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cells. The comparison of CFE in CD133+ cells with or without UAC treatment showed that the spheres from former were smaller and only fewer in number than those in latter. Hence UAC treatment caused a decrease in self-renewal capability of CD133+ HCC CSCs.
Figure 4.

Inhibition of self-renewal and tumorigenic capacities of CD133+ CSCs by UAC. A. CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cells were pretreated with UAC for 10 days. Each group of cells was suspended in growth media containing 0.3% soft agar and seeded in 24-well plates to evaluate colony formation efficiency (CFE; n = 3). B. Inhibition of capacity for CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cell sphere formation by UAC.
In an immunodeficient mouse xenograft model, CD133+ cells were injected with UAC or only normal saline at the time of cell implantation. Out of 10 animals in normal saline group, 9 developed tumors of large size Figure 4B, whereas in UAC treated group (10 animals) none of the animals developed tumor. These results demonstrate that UAC exhibits a strong in vivo antitumor effect.
Enhancement of the sensitivity of HCC CSCs to chemotherapeutic drugs by UAC
Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a characteristic feature of CSC. Using doxorubicin and vincristine, we demonstrated that UAC treated CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cells showed increased sensitivity to these drugs. The CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cells showed marked increase in resistance to doxorubicin and vincristine in absence of UAC (Figure 5A). Resistance of HCC CSCs to chemotherapeutic agents is due to upregulation of the superfamily of ABC transporters like ABCG2 [52]. UAC treatment significantly decreased ABCG2 expression in PLC/PRF/5.
Figure 5.

Enhancement in the activity of chemotherapeutic agents on HCC CSCs by UAC. The cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin and vincristine on CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cells that had been pretreated with UAC were tested with the MTT assay.
Discussion
The role of CD133 in maintaining stemness of CSCs is demonstrated by decrease in its expression with differentiation of tumor cells [27]. CD133+ HCC cells are reported to have higher in vitro proliferation capacity and tumorigenesis ability [15]. Although Ursolic acid and its derivatives have been reported to induce apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells [41-47]. We first time reported inhibition of CD133+ expression by UAC in PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 HCC cells. Ursolic acid chalcone (UAC) treatment increased CD133+ HCC CSCs differentiation, decreased their self-renewal and tumorigenic capacity and increased their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Thus UAC can be a potential differentiation therapeutic agent to target CSCs in HCC. The most successful application of differentiation therapy is the use of all trans retinoic acid in acute premyelocytic leukemia, which is applied as a prodifferentiation inducer to enhance the chemotherapeutic effects [53]. In the present study we observed an increase in CD133+ HCC CSC differentiation on UAC treatment in PLC/PRF/5 and Huh7 HCC cells in dose and time-dependent manner.
The self-renewal capability of HCC CSC cell populations is indicated by the number and size of the spheres [49]. UAC treatment induced inhibition of Oct4, Tert, Bmi1, β-catenin, ABCG2, and tumor sphere-related gene Ep300 expression. The comparison of CFE in CD133+ cells with or without UAC treatment showed that the spheres from former were smaller and only fewer in number than those in latter. Treatment of CD133+ and CD133- PLC/PRF/5 cell cultures (in CDM suspension) with UAC resulted in lower colony formation efficiency (CFE) in CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cell after 8 days.
Resistance of HCC CSCs to chemotherapeutic agents is due to upregulation of the superfamily of ABC transporters like ABCG2 [52]. Using doxorubicin and vincristine, we demonstrated that UAC treated CD133+ PLC/PRF/5 cells showed increased sensitivity to these drugs. In conclusion the results from our study demonstrate the ursolic acid chalcone can be a potential candidate in the differentiation theraphy by targeting CSC in HCC.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by projects of science and technology development plan of Jilin province (20130102091JC).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:533–543. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00486-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–2576. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rich JN. Cancer stem cells in radiation resistance. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8980–8984. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosen JM, Jordan CT. The increasing complexity of the cancer stem cell paradigm. Science. 2009;324:1670–1673. doi: 10.1126/science.1171837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444:756–760. doi: 10.1038/nature05236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baumann M, Krause M, Hill R. Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:545–554. doi: 10.1038/nrc2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eramo A, Ricci-Vitiani L, Zeuner A, Pallini R, Lotti F, Sette G, Pilozzi E, Larocca LM, Peschle C, De Maria R. Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1238–1241. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Winquist RJ, Boucher DM, Wood M, Furey BF. Targeting cancer stem cells for more effective therapies: Taking out cancer’s locomotive engine. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Q, Shi S, Yen Y, Brown J, Ta JQ, Le AD. A subpopulation of CD133+ cancer stem-like cells characterized in human oral squamous cell carcinoma confer resistance to chemotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2010;289:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, Tunici P, Ng H, Abdulkadir IR, Lu L, Irvin D, Black KL, Yu JS. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer. 2006;5:67. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jin Y, Bin ZQ, Qiang H, Liang C, Hua C, Jun D, Dong WA, Qing L. ABCG2 is related with the grade of glioma and resistance to mitoantone, a chemotherapeutic drug for glioma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135:1369–1376. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0578-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chiba T, Kamiya A, Yokosuka O, Iwama A. Cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma: Recent progress and perspective. Cancer Lett. 2009;286:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chiba T, Kita K, Zheng YW, Yokosuka O, Saisho H, Iwama A, Nakauchi H, Taniguchi H. Side population purified from hepatocellular carcinoma cells harbors cancer stem cell-like properties. Hepatology. 2006;44:240–251. doi: 10.1002/hep.21227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yin S, Li J, Hu C, Chen X, Yao M, Yan M, Jiang G, Ge C, Xie H, Wan D, Yang S, Zheng S, Gu J. CD133 positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells possess high capacity for tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1444–1450. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma S, Chan K, Hu L, Lee TK, Wo JY, Ng IO, Zheng BJ, Guan XY. Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2542–2556. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang W, Yan HX, Chen L, Liu Q, He YQ, Yu LX, Zhang SH, Huang DD, Tang L, Kong XN, Chen C, Liu SQ, Wu MC, Wang HY. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling contributes to activation of normal and tumorigenic liver progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4287–4295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yamashita T, Ji J, Budhu A, Forgues M, Yang W, Wang HY, Jia H, Ye Q, Qin LX, Wauthier E, Reid LM, Minato H, Honda M, Kaneko S, Tang ZY, Wang XW. EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1012–1024. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suetsugu A, Nagaki M, Aoki H, Motohashi T, Kunisada T, Moriwaki H. Characterization of CD133+ hepatocellular carcinoma cells as cancer stem/progenitor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;351:820–824. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, Almeida-Porada G, Ogawa M, Leary AG, Olweus J, Kearney J, Buck DW. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1997;90:5002–5012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richardson GD, Robson CN, Lang SH, Neal DE, Maitland NJ, Collins AT. CD133, a novel marker for human prostatic epithelial stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:3539–3545. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Corbeil D, Roper K, Hellwig A, Tavian M, Miraglia S, Watt SM, Simmons PJ, Peault B, Buck DW, Huttner WB. The human AC133 hematopoietic stem cell antigen is also expressed in epithelial cells and targeted to plasma membrane protrusions. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:5512–5520. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, Reitsma MJ, Masek M, Phan TV, Tsukamoto AS, Gage FH, Weissman IL. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:14720–14725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, Dirks PB. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5821–5828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bruno S, Bussolati B, Grange C, Collino F, Graziano ME, Ferrando U, Camussi G. CD133+ renal progenitor cells contribute to tumor angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2006;169:2223–2235. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Brien CA, Pollett A, Gallinger S, Dick JE. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature. 2007;445:106–110. doi: 10.1038/nature05372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ. Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10946–10951. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song W, Li H, Tao K, Li R, Song Z, Zhao Q, Zhang F, Dou K. Expression and clinical significance of the stem cell marker CD133 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1212–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu J. Pharmacology of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid. J Ethnopharmacol. 1995;49:57–68. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(95)90032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang MT, Ho CT, Wang ZY, Ferraro T, Lou YR, Stauber K, Ma W, Georgiadis C, Laskin JD, Conney AH. Inhibition of skin tumorigenesis by rosemary and its constituents carnosol and ursolic acid. Cancer Res. 1994;54:701–708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tokuda H, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K, Ito Y. Inhibitory effects of ursolic and oleanolic acid on skin tumor promotion by 12-O-tetradeca-noylphorbol-13-acetate. Cancer Lett. 1986;33:279–285. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(86)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ohigashi H, Takamura H, Koshimizu K, Tokuda H, Ito Y. Search for possible antitumor promoters by inhibition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetateinduced Epstein-Barr virus activation; ursolic acid and oleanolic acid from an anti-inflammatory Chinese medicinal plant, Glechoma hederaceae L. Cancer Lett. 1986;30:143–151. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(86)90082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nishino H, Nishino A, Takayasu J, Hasegawa T, Iwashima A, Hirabayashi K, Iwata S, Shibata S. Inhibition of the tumor-promoting action of 12-O tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate by some oleanane-type triterpenoid compounds. Cancer Res. 1988;48:5210–5215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sohn KH, Lee HY, Chung HY, Young HS, Yi SY, Kim KW. Anti-angiogenic activity of triterpene acids. Cancer Lett. 1995;94:213–218. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(95)03856-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Simon A, Najid A, Chulia AJ, Delage C, Rigaud M. Inhibition of lipoxygenase activity and HL60 leukemic cell proliferation by ursolic acid isolated from heather flowers (Calluna vulgaris) Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1125:68–72. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(92)90157-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Najid A, Simon A, Cook J, Chable-Rabinovitch H, Delage C, Chulia AJ, Rigaud M. Characterization of ursolic acid as a lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase inhibitor using macrophages, platelets and differentiated HL60 leukemic cells. FEBS Lett. 1992;299:213–217. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80117-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ringbom T, Segura L, Noreen Y, Perera P, Bohlin L. Ursolic acid from Plantago major, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 catalyzed prostaglandin biosynthesis. J Nat Prod. 1998;61:1212–1215. doi: 10.1021/np980088i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Subbaramaiah K, Michaluart P, Sporn MB, Dannenberg AJ. Ursolic acid inhibits cyclooxygenase-2 transcription in human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2399–2404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cha HJ, Park MT, Chung HY, Kim ND, Sato H, Seiki M, Kim KW. Ursolic acid-induced down-regulation of MMP-9 gene is mediated through the nuclear translocation of glucocorticoid receptor in HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells. Oncogene. 1998;16:771–778. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cha HJ, Bae SK, Lee HY, Lee OH, Sato H, Seiki M, Park BC, Kim KW. Anti-invasive activity of ursolic acid correlates with the reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2281–2284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Suh N, Honda T, Finlay HJ, Barchowsky A, Williams C, Benoit NE, Xie QW, Nathan C, Gribble GW, Sporn MB. Novel triterpenoids suppress inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and inducible cyclooxygenase (COX-2) in mouse macrophages. Cancer Res. 1998;58:717–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Es-Saady D, Simon A, Jayat-Vignoles C, Chulia AJ, Delage C. MCF-7 cell cycle arrested at G1 through ursolic acid, and increased reduction of tetrazolium salts. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:481–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Es-saady D, Simon A, Ollier M, Maurizis JC, Chulia AJ, Delage C. Inhibitory effect of ursolic acid on B16 proliferation through cell cycle arrest. Cancer Lett. 1996;106:193–197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04312-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Choi YH, Baek JH, Yoo MA, Chung HY, Kim ND, Kim KW. Induction of apoptosis by ursolic acid through activation of caspases and downregulation of c-IAPs in human prostate epithelial cells. Int J Oncol. 2000;17:565–571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hollosy F, Meszaros G, Bokonyi G, Idei M, Seprodi A, Szende B, Keri G. Cytostatic, cytotoxic and protein tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity of ursolic acid in A431 human tumor cells. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:4563–4570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hollosy F, Idei M, Csorba G, Szabo E, Bokonyi G, Seprodi A, Meszaros G, Szende B, Keri G. Activation of caspase-3 protease during the process of ursolic acid and its derivative-induced apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:3485–3491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Choi BM, Park R, Pae HO, Yoo JC, Kim YC, Jun CD, Jung BH, Oh GS, So HS, Kim YM, Chung HT. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate inhibits ursolic acid-induced apoptosis via activation of protein kinase A in human leukaemic HL-60 cells. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;86:53–58. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2000.d01-10.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Konopleva M, Tsao T, Ruvolo P, Stiouf I, Estrov Z, Leysath CE, Zhao S, Harris D, Chang S, Jackson CE, Munsell M, Suh N, Gribble G, Honda T, May WS, Sporn MB, Andreeff M. Novel triterpenoid CDDO-Me is a potent inducer of apoptosis and differentiation in acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2002;99:326–335. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.1.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim DK, Baek JH, Kang CM, Yoo MA, Sung JW, Chung HY, Kim ND, Choi YH, Lee SH, Kim KW. Apoptotic activity of ursolic acid may correlate with the inhibition of initiation of DNA replication. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:629–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ma S, Tang KH, Chan YP, Lee TK, Kwan PS, Castilho A, Ng I, Man K, Wong N, To KF, Zheng BJ, Lai PB, Lo CM, Chan KW, Guan XY. miR-130b Promotes CD133(+) liver tumor-initiating cell growth and self-renewal via tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim H, Choi GH, Na DC, Ahn EY, Kim GI, Lee JE, Cho JY, Yoo JE, Choi JS, Park YN. Human hepatocellular carcinomas with “Stemness”-related marker expression: keratin 19 expression and a poor prognosis. Hepatology. 2011;54:1707–17. doi: 10.1002/hep.24559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fiegel HC, Park JJ, Lioznov MV, Martin A, Jaeschke-Melli S, Kaufmann PM, Fehse B, Zander AR, Kluth D. Characterization of cell types during rat liver development. Hepatology. 2003;37:148–54. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lixing Z, Hefen S, Fangyu Z, Ping L, Chao G, Hong L, Helei H, Mingxia Y, Taoyang C, Guoping J, Haiyang X, Ying C, Xiaowu H, Jia F, Ming Y, Jinjun L. BMP4 Administration Induces Differentiation of CD133+ Hepatic Cancer Stem Cells, Blocking Their Contributions to Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4276–4285. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chou WC, Dang CV. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: recent advances in therapy and molecular basis of response to arsenic therapies. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005;12:1–6. doi: 10.1097/01.moh.0000148552.93303.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
