Abstract
Horse gram is an underutilized pulse crop grown in wide range of adverse climatic conditions. It occupies an important place in human nutrition and has rich source of protein, minerals, and vitamins. Besides nutritional importance, it has been linked to reduced risk of various diseases due to presence of non-nutritive bioactive substances. These bioactive substances such as phytic acid, phenolic acid, fiber, enzymatic/proteinase inhibitors have significant metabolic and/or physiological effects. The importance of horse gram was well recognized by the folk/alternative/traditional medicine as a potential therapeutic agent to treat kidney stones, urinary diseases, piles, common cold, throat infection, fever etc. The inception of nutraceutical concept and increasing health consciousness the demand of nutraceutical and functional food is increased. In recent years, isolation and utilization of potential antioxidants from legumes including horse gram are increased as it decreases the risk of intestinal diseases, diabetes, coronary heart disease, prevention of dental caries etc. Keeping in view the increasing demand of food having nutraceutical values, the present review ascribed with recent scientific knowledge towards the possibilities of exploring the horse gram, as a source of food and nutraceuticals compounds.
Keywords: Antinutritional compounds, Prebiotic, Phytochemicals, Antioxidant, Bioactive compounds, Oligosaccharides
Introduction
Horse gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam. (Verdc.)], previously Dolichos biflorus] is an underutilized (Aiyer 1990) and unexplored (Reddy et al. 2008) food legume. It is considered as a good source of protein, carbohydrates, energy (Bravo et al. 1998). It is tolerant to drought (Bhardwaj and Yadav 2012), salinity (Reddy et al. 1998) and heavy metal stresses (Reddy et al. 2005). Horse gram mainly grown in India, Africa, Australia, Burma, Malaysia, Mauritius, and the West Indies (Jeswani and Baldev 1990) under low soil fertility status with few inputs (Witcombe et al. 2008). It is adapted to wide range of temperature regimes (Smartt 1985) where other crops invariably fail to survive. In India, it is generally sown late in the rainy season by resource-poor farmers in marginal and drought-prone condition. However, sowing of seeds on the first fortnight of August and September recorded higher grain and straw yields than those sown on the first fortnight of October (Naik 2001), even some report indicated that delayed sowing beyond 28 August substantially reduced crop yield (Bajpai et al. 1990).
M. uniflorum is a short day and day neutral plant, matures in 120–180 days after planting, (Cook et al. 2005). The origin of the horse gram is not known. However, the region of maximum genetic diversity is considered to be in the Old World Tropics, especially in India and Himalayas (Zeven and de Wet 1982) and has diploid chromosome numbers of 2n = 20, 22, 24 (Cook et al. 2005). It has been used as a food item for millennia. Archaeological investigations revealed that horse gram used as food around 2000 BC (Mehra 2000).
Ethnic uses of horse gram
The soup extract from kulattha (Horse gram), called yusa, was consumed commonly during the Sutra period (c. 1500–800 BC) are the rasams of today (Achaya 1998). Horse gram is widely grown for human food as a pulse and fodder crop for livestock (Cook et al. 2005) as well as green manure and medicinal crop. In rural areas, seeds of horsegram are consumed after parched followed by boiling or frying (Purseglove 1974) along with cooked rice, sorghum or pearl millet. Sprouted seeds, having high nutritional quality, are widely consumed by the indigenous tribal peoples (Bravo et al. 1999). Even now, in addition to its nutritive value, the consumption of sprouted seed become increasingly popular due to the excellent source to reduce the risk of various diseases and exerting health promoting effects (Paśko et al. 2009). In Indian traditional medicine, seeds of horse gram are used for treatment of urinary stones (Yadava and Vyas 1994; Ravishankar and Vishnupriya 2012), urinary diseases and piles (Yadava and Vyas 1994), regulate the abnormal menstrual cycle in women (Neelam 2007), act as astringent, tonic (Brink 2006), and also used to treat calculus afflictions, corpulence, hiccups, and worms (Chunekar and Pandey 1998). Furthermore, the cooked liquor of the horse gram seeds with spices is considered to be a potential remedy for the common cold, throat infection, fever and the soup said to generate heat (Perumal and Sellamuthu 2007).
Owing to their nutritional and medicinal value, there is an increased demand to explore an underutilized legume (Chel-Guerrero et al. 2002; Arinathan et al. 2003) to alleviate malnutrition and reduce risk of various diseases in developing countries. Horse gram is an excellent source of protein (17.9–25.3 %), carbohydrates (51.9–60.9 %), essential amino acids, energy, low content of lipid (0.58–2.06 %), iron (Bravo et al. 1999; Sodani et al. 2004), molybdenum (Bravo et al. 1999), phosphorus, iron and vitamins such as carotene, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin and vitamin C (Sodani et al. 2004). The details of major nutrient available in horse gram are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Major nutrients in different milled fractions of Horse Gram (Percent of dry matter)
| Constituent | Cotyledon* | Embryonic axe* | Seed coat* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 5.8 ± 0.31b | 8.4 ± 0.21a | 3.9 ± 0.05c |
| Protein | 22.6 ± 1.23a | 18.6 ± 0.90b | 9.1 ± 0.35c |
| Fat | 1.8 ± 0.06b | 2.6 ± 0.04a | 0.6 ± 0.02c |
| Ash | 2.9 ± 0.02b | 2.2 ± 0.04b | 3.8 ± 0.05a |
| Crude fiber | 1.6 ± 0.02c | 11.2 ± 0.26b | 21.8 ± 1.6a |
| Total carbohydratea | 66.9 ± 2.6b | 68.2 ± 1.9b | 82.6 ± 1.1a |
| Soluble sugars | 6.4 ± 0.15a | 4.8 ± 0.19b | 0.96 ± 0.06c |
| Reducing sugar (mg/100 g) | 538.3 ± 16.2a | 211.7 ± 6.3b | 108.6 ± 5.1c |
| Non reducing sugar | 5.86 ± 0.15a | 4.6 ± 0.08b | 0.85 ± 0.03c |
| Dietary fiber | 16.7 ± 0.27c | 22.6 ± 0.18b | 36.4 ± 0.90a |
| Soluble | 1.32 ± 0.04b | 3.1 ± 0.04a | 3.9 ± 0.05a |
| Insoluble | 15.38 ± 0.16c | 19.5 ± 0.28b | 32.5 ± 1.1a |
* Values are mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations. Means with the same letter (a, b, c) within the same row do not differ (P > 0.05)
aBy difference as 100 - (moisture + protein + ash + fat)
Sreerama et al. (2010a)
Nutraceutical properties of horse gram
Pulse crops are excellent sources of protein, dietary fiber, micronutrients and phytochemicals (Messina 1999). In addition to nutrients, it can also supply many bioactive substances in small quantities which have significant metabolic and/or physiological effects. These bioactive substances are referred as non-nutrient bioactive compounds, viz. phenolic acids, flavonoids and high molecular tannins (Siddhuraju and Becker 2007). These compounds contain potential medicinal/nutraceutical properties and have inhibitory role in reduction of various diseases like, coronary heart diseases, diabetes, and obesity (Bazzano et al. 2001).
The term “nutraceutical” introduced in 1989 by Stephen DeFelice can be defined as, “a food (or part of a food) that provides medical or health benefits, including the prevention and/or treatment of a disease (Brower 1998). In simple terms, nutraceuticals are those foods or parts of foods that provide health and/or medical benefits including prevention, protection and treatment of a disease (Belem 1999). In view, of its medicinal synergy, economical status and no side effects, the nutraceuticals, functional or health foods have gained a wide interest during the last few decades (Raskin et al. 2002). The health promoting effects of phytochemicals and nutraceuticals and/or functional foods are likely due to a complex mix of biochemical and cellular interactions which together promote overall health of the individual (Dillard and German 2000). The clinical success of nutraceutical products (Acharya and Thomas 2007) coupled with increasing health consciousness results in rapid global growth of the nutraceuticals and functional food industry (Hasler 2000). The major chemical compounds recognized as potential health promoting benefits are the phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, carotenoids, prebiotics, phytosterols, tannins, fatty acids, terpenoids, saponins, and soluble and insoluble dietary fibers (Patwardhan et al. 2005).
Plant materials play major role in primary health care (Motsei et al. 2003). Scientist have claimed that the grain legumes effectively contribute to a balanced diet and can prevent widely diffused diseases, including type II diabetes and cardio vascular diseases (Leterme 2002). The extracts from M. uniflorum seeds had significant activity against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gupta et al. 2005). Different parts of the horse gram plants are used for the treatment of heart conditions, asthma, bronchitis, leucoderma, urinary discharges and for treatment of kidney stones (Ghani 2003).
A literature survey showed that Dolichin A and B, pyroglutaminylglutamine along with some flavonoids were isolated from horse gram (Handa et al. 1990; Kawsar et al. 2009). The ethanolic seed extract of M. uniflorum showed potential free radical scavengers (antioxidant) with significant scavenging activity of 64.01 % ± 1.78 at 500 μg/ml in Nitric Oxide radical Scavenging Assay, 74.42 % ± 2.37at 1,000 μg/ml in Hydroxyl method and 92.59 % ± 2.05at 250 μg/ml in Phosphomolybdate method as compared to that of standard (Ravishankar and Vishnu Priya 2012). Moreover, phytochemical studies revealed that Kaempferal-3-O-β-D-glucoside, β-sitosterol,stigmasterol (Kawsar et al. 2003) and phenolic compounds (Kawsar et al. 2008) were isolated from horse gram have the cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activities (Kawsar et al. 2008). Considering the nutritional and antinutritional aspects of horse gram, it has the greatest potential for further utilization as nutraceuticals, forage and food for malnourished areas of the world (Morris 2008). In the later sections nutraceutical properties of horse gram will be discussed under sub head: nutrient and non-nutrient bioactive compounds.
Nutrient bioactive compounds
Protein and amino acid
Grain legumes are important sources of food proteins and often they represent a necessary supplement to other protein sources (Duranti and Giusi 1997). Protein content in horse gram seed varies from 18.5 to 28.5 % (Savithramma and Shambulingappa 1996). Seed fraction of legume consist of cotyledon, seed coat and embryonic axe, which represent on an average of 89, 10 and 1 % of the total seed weight, respectively (Neelam 2007). The protein content of milled fraction of horse gram (Table 1) varies widely from 22.6 % in cotyledon to 9.1 % in seed coat fraction, whereas, embryonic axe contain higher protein than seed coat and lower than cotyledons (Sreerama et al. 2010b).
Proteins are classified on basis of their solubility as water-soluble albumins, salt-soluble globulins, alcohol-soluble prolamins, and acid- or alkaline-soluble glutelins (Utsumi 1992). Digestibility of raw and cooked legume protein varies from15–80 to 50–90 %, respectively, as compare to cereal seed protein (75–90 %) (Eggum and Beames 1983). The nutritional value of high protein foods are based on both protein quantity and quality.
In legume seeds, the major proteins are globulins (50–90 %) (Utsumi 1992), glutelins (10–20 %) and albumins (10–20 %) (Duranti 2006). In horse gram, out of the total protein content, albumin-globulin protein fraction contributes from 75.27 to 78.76 %, while glutelin and residual protein varies from 9.93–17.52 to 6.96–11.30 %, respectively (Yadav et al. 2004). It also has high lysine content, an essential amino acid (0.52 g g−1 of nitrogen) as compared to blackgram (0.40 g g−1 of N) and pigeonpea (0.48 g g−1 of N)(Gopalan et al. 1989). The other major amino acid found in horse gram seed are arginine, histidine, lysine, valine, leucine etc. but have primary limitation in methionine and tryptophan (sulfur-containing amino acids) (Thirumaran and Kanchana 2000).
Proteins and its peptides have been shown to inhibit the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antimicrobial activity, antioxidant activity, anti-carcinogenic activity, hypocholesterolemic effect, reduced serum triglycerides, increased lean muscle mass, protection against pathogens, regulation of blood glucose levels, and satiety effects (Chatterton et al. 2006; Severin and Xia 2005; Seyler et al. 2007). The branched-chain amino acids, leucine, isoleucine and valine participate in a variety of important biological functions in the brain, including those from tryptophan and tyrosine (Harris et al. 2005; Russo et al. 2003). There are many other types of protein found in legumes including various enzymes, protease inhibitors and lectins, which are collectively known as antinutritional compounds (ANCs).
Carbohydrate: starch, soluble sugar and dietary fiber
Carbohydrates are the major component of legumes, constitute from 50 to 70 % of the dry matter (Bravo et al. 1999) and are classified as digestible and non-digestible carbohydrates. The most abundant carbohydrates in legume seeds are starch and non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fiber), with smaller but significant amounts of oligosaccharides (Bravo et al. 1998). Starch is considered as partly digestible (Bravo et al. 1999) and those starches which are not digested in small intestine reaches the large intestine, where it is fermented by the colonic microflora and is known as resistant starch (Asp et al. 1996). Resistant starch, a non-digestible carbohydrate (Table 2) account 43.4 % of total carbohydrate in horse gram (Bravo et al. 1999). Fermentation of resistant starch yields relatively high amounts of butyrate and it is believed to exert a protective effect against colorectal cancer (Scheppach et al. 1995). This butyrate may reduce the risk of malignant changes in cells (Whitehead et al. 1986), increase in faecal bulking (Cummings et al. 1992) and lower faecal pH (Malhotra 1982). Resistant starch enriched food have beneficial for management of diabetes due to reduced postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic response (Granfeldt et al. 1994).
Table 2.
Soluble sugar and starch fraction of raw horse gram (g/100 g dry matter)
| Soluble sugar and starch fractions | g/100 g dry mattera |
|---|---|
| Oligosaccharides | 3.69 ± 0.24 |
| Sucrose | 1.21 ± 0.12 |
| Maltose | 0.53 ± 0.06 |
| Glucose | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| Xylose | 0.64 ± 0.09 |
| Galactose | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| Arabinose | 0.12 ± 0.03 |
| Fructose | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Inositol | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| Total soluble sugar | 6.38 |
| Total starch | 36.0 ± 1.17 |
| Digestible starch (% of TS) b | 30.8 (85) |
| Resistant starch | 5.21 ± 0.64 |
| IDF-RSc | 1.22 ± 0.03 |
aMean values ± STD (n = 3)
bCalculated by difference as TS-RS(Total starch-Resistant starch)
c IDF-RS Resistant starch associated to insoluble dietary fiber
Bravo et al. (1999)
Soluble sugar in horse gram consists of oligosaccharides, disaccharides (sucrose and maltose) and monosaccharides (glucose, galactose, arabinose, fructose and inositol). Oligosaccharides are the main constituent sugars of the soluble fraction, of most of the pulse crop, including horse gram. The oligosaccharide content in horse gram is 3.69 %. Small amount of maltose and monosaccharide was also detected in horse gram. Moreover, total carbohydrate, soluble sugars, reducing sugars, and non-reducing sugars were present in higher amounts in cotyledon fractions (Table 2).
Plant foods are the only sources of dietary fibers. The fiber content of human foods, from plant sources ranges from trace amounts to almost 50 % of dry weight (Anderson and Bridge 1988). Dietary fiber refers all polysaccharide which is resistant to digestion and absorption in small intestine but complete and partial fermentation in large intestine (Prosky and De Vries 1991). More recently, it includes oligosaccharides, such as inulin, and resistant starches (Jones et al. 2006). Major dietary fiber includes cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectin, arabinoxylans, betaglucan, glucomannans, plant gums and mucilages and hydrocolloids, which are principally found in the plant cell wall (Cummings and Stephen 2007). Pulses are good sources of both insoluble and soluble dietary fiber (Ramulu and Udayasekhararao 1997). Horse gram contains both soluble and non-soluble fiber (Table 3). Seeds of M. uniflorum contain more insoluble dietary fiber than kidney bean (Phaseolus aconitifolius) (Kawale et al. 2005). Crude fiber content was higher in seed coat fractions than in embryonic axe and cotyledon fractions. Furthermore, seed coat fractions of legumes with high fiber and low protein may be useful in food product formulations to improve gastrointestinal health and satiety changes (Sreerama et al. 2010a, b).
Table 3.
Composition of the dietary fiber fractions of raw horse gram (g/100 g dry matter)
| Dietary fiber fractions | Insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) | Soluble dietary fiber (SDF) | Total dietary fiber (TDF) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fucose | nd | nd | nd |
| Arabinose | 4.14 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 4.30 ± 0.05 |
| Xylose | 1.93 ± 0.10 | nd | 1.93 ± 0.10 |
| Mannose | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.04 |
| Galactose | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.04 |
| Glucose | 7.46 ± 0.53 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 7.57 ± 0.52 |
| Total neutral sugars | 14.06 ± 0.78 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 14.65 ± 0.73 |
| Uronic acids | 1.94 ± 0.10 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 2.20 ± 0.08 |
| Klason lignin | 5.61 ± 0.39 | – | 5.61 ± 0.39 |
| Total dietary fiber | 21.61 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.03 | 22.47 ± 0.07 |
nd not detected
Bravo et al. (1999)
In human being, fibers primarily act on gastrointestinal tract, affecting different physiological effects like, alteration of the gastrointestinal transit time, satiety changes, influence on the levels of body cholesterol, after-meal serum glucose and insulin levels, flatulence and alteration in nutrient bioavailability (Lajolo et al. 2001). The main bioactive functions that have been attributed to dietary fibers are reduce constipation, modulation of blood glucose level (Spiller 2001; Redgwell and Fischer 2005), cholesterol reduction, prebiotic effects, prevention of certain cancers (Redgwell and Fischer 2005; Spiller 2001), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diverticulosis, obesity (Spiller 2001) and lowers blood pressure (Brand et al. 1990). Similarly, Sharma and Kawatra (1995) also reported that soluble fiber also decreases serum cholesterol, reducing the risk of heart attack and colon cancer. Insoluble dietary fiber is required for normal, lower intestinal function in humans (Anderson et al. 1994).
Non-nutrient bioactive compounds
Pulses contain various molecules that can exert a broad range of biological actions in the human body, including both favourable and undesirable ones. The undesirable ones are to be considered as antinutrients or anti-nutritional factors (or compounds) (Thompson 1993). The antinutritional compounds found in pulse crops can be categorized as protein ANCs and non-protein ANCs (Duranti and Gius 1997). Non-protein ANCs include alkaloids (Markievicz et al. 1988), phytic acid, phenolic compounds such as tannins (Davis 1981) and saponins (Hudson and El-Difrawi 1979). The presence of antinutritional factors, such as phenols, tannins (Cardador-Martinez et al. 2002), phytic acid (Urbano et al. 2000) and flatulence-causing oligosaccharides (Udensi et al. 2007) are now being considered as potential antioxidants. These antinutrients causes a number of positive health effects such as a decrease risk of intestinal diseases (gallstones, diverticulosis, constipation and colon cancer), coronary heart disease, prevention of dental caries and treatment of diabetes (Asp et al. 1996; Oku 1996). Saponins and another common class of antinutrients compounds have been reported to show hypocholesterolemic as well as anticarcinogenic effects (Koratkar and Rao 1997).
Phytic acid
Phytic acid or inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) is a simple ringed carbohydrate with six phosphate groups attached to each carbon (a bioactive sugar molecule) and a major form of phosphorylated inositol (Norazalina et al. 2010). Phytic acid exists in the form of free acid, phytate, or phytin and all of these forms are interchangeable (Lori et al. 2001). It is widely distribute in legume seeds and it accounts for about 78 % of the total phosphorus in pulses (Chitra et al. 1995). The concentration of phytic acid in horse gram (Table 4) revealed a significant quantity in embryonic axe fractions, whereas, most of it concentration located in the cotyledon fractions. Phytic acid is considered as an anti-nutrient because it inhibit the digestibility of proteins, ‘hard-to-cook’ (Stanley and Aguilera 1985) and also reduces the bioavaibility of minerals such as calcium, zinc, iron, and magnesium (Sandberg 2002). On the other hand, it has potential antioxidant (Graf and Eaton 1990), anticarcinogenic (Turner et al. 2002; Shamsuddin et al. 1997), reduces the rate of cell proliferation, augmenting the immune response (Reddy 1999) and hypoglycemic or hypolipidemic (Rickard and Thompson 1997) activities. Phytate may have a stronger ability to quench free radicals because of its metal-chelating ability, which renders the prooxidant metal iron unavailable to participate in the Fenton reaction and to catalyze hydroxyl radical formation in vitro (Rao et al. 1991). Thus, phytate may prevent oxidative damage, such as lipid peroxidation (Ko and Godin 1991; Porres et al. 1999) and may thereby decrease the formation of atherosclerotic lesions.
Table 4.
Concentration of antinutritional factors in different milled fractions of Horse Gram (Percent of dry matter)
| Antinutritional factor | Cotyledon * | Embryonic axe * | Seed coat * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Phytic acid (mg/g) | 8.42 ± 0.41a | 3.81 ± 0.11b | 1.02 ± 0.09c |
| 2. | Flatulence factors (mg/g) | |||
| a. Raffinose | 6.35 ± 0.26a | 2.86 ± 0.09b | 0.96 ± 0.03c | |
| b. Stachyose | 14.84 ± 0.91a | 6.38 ± 0.38b | 0.70 ± 0.05c | |
| c. Verbascose | 3.75 ± 0.26a | 1.38 ± 0.04b | 1.05 ± 0.04c | |
| 3. | Enzyme inhibitors (units/g) | |||
| Buffer extract | ||||
| a. Trypsin inhibitor activity | 9,856 ± 16.1a | 2,018 ± 12.9b | 1,134 ± 8.2c | |
| b. α-amylase inhibitor activity | 56.9 ± 1.1a | 12.3 ± 0.4b | 4.1 ± 0.2c | |
| Methanol extract | ||||
| a. Trypsin inhibitor activity | 2,474 ± 11.8c | 3,663 ± 13.1b | 10,434 ± 21.4a | |
| b. α-amylase inhibitor activity | 632.2 ± 2.4b | 639.5 ± 2.0b | 937.3 ± 2.7a | |
* Results are mean ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations. Mean values bearing different letters (a, b, c) in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05) on application of Duncan’s multiple-range test
Sreerama et al. (2010a)
Phenolic compounds
Phenolic compounds have a greatest beneficial interest on human health due to presence of antioxidant property, such as protection of oxidative damage (Sundaram et al. 2013). Natural polyphenols can range from simple molecules, such as phenolic acids, to highly polymerized compounds like tannins. Phenolic content of legumes varied in the range of 0.325–6.378 mgGAE(gallic acid equivalent)/g (Marathe et al. 2011). Marathe et al. (2011) reported that the horse gram is grouped under high phenolic acid content group (3.579 ± 0.072 mgGAE/g). The principal phenolic compound (Table 5) of horse gram seed are flavonols (flavanoids) such as quercetin, kaempferol, and myricetin, vanillic, ρ-hydroxybenzoic, and ferulic acids (Sreerama et al. 2010a). The phenolic acids are a large family of secondary metabolites having either derivatives of benzoic acid (e.g. gallic, syringic and vanillic acid) or of cinnamic acid (e.g.caffeic, ferulic, sinapic and ρ -coumaric acid), which are commonly found as esters of caffeic and quinic acids (Kawsar et al. 2008) and are responsible for various beneficial effects in a multitude of diseases (Soobrattee et al. 2005). Sundaram et al. (2013) reported 0.101 g/100 g tannin in horse gram seed. Tannins are oligomeric, higher molecular weight polyphenolic compounds, occurring naturally in plants. Synthetic antioxidants are widely used to reduce oxidative damage, but due to safety and toxicity concern much attention has been focused on the use of natural antioxidants to protect the human body by free radicals (Ramesh et al. 2011).
Table 5.
Phenolic compounds in different milled fractions of horse grama
| Horse gram fractions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotyledon | Embryonic axe | Seed coat | |
| Concentration (μg/g on dry weight basis) | |||
| Flavonoids | |||
| Quercetin | 9.7 ± 0.55c | 113.4 ± 6.0b | 129.5 ± 11.3a |
| Kaempferol | 6.0 ± 0.25c | 67.4 ± 3.7b | 117.2 ± 10.5a |
| Myricetin | 2.4 ± 0.07b | 32.9 ± 3.3a | 35.5 ± 5.2a |
| Daidzein | 4.1 ± 0.08b | 22.2 ± 1.3a | 0.94 ± 0.03c |
| Genistein | nd | 44.7 ± 3.22 | nd |
| Phenolic acids | |||
| Benzoic acid derivatives | |||
| Gallic acid | 26.9 ± 1.3a | 19.8 ± 0.8b | 5.5 ± 0.06c |
| Protocatechuic acid | 39.0 ± 2.0a | 11.8 ± 0.4 | 23.1 ± 1.2b |
| ρ-hydroxybenzoic acid | 20.1 ± 0.8b | 13.1 ± 0.5c | 28.8 ± 1.4a |
| Vanillic acid | 58.4 ± 3.3a | 53.2 ± 5.1a | 42.4 ± 3.6b |
| Syringic acid | 18.4 ± 1.0a | ndb | 4.5 ± 0.02b |
| Subtotal | 162.8 | 97.9 | 104.3 |
| Cinnamic acid derivatives | |||
| Caffeic acid | 88.9 ± 5.0a | 61.5 ± 4.9b | 10.6 ± 0.6c |
| Chlorogenic acid | 160.8 ± 9.8a | 26.8 ± 2.1b | 22.5 ± 1.1 b,c |
| Ferullic acid | 70.1 ± 5.1a | 31.4 ± 2.4c | 37.5 ± 2.5b |
| Sinapic acid | 9.7 ± 0.09a | nd | 3.7 ± 0.02b |
| ρ-coumaric acid | 40.9 ± 3.2a | 21.4 ± 1.3c | 24.5 ± 1.8b |
| Subtotal | 370.4 | 141.1 | 98.8 |
| Total | 533.2 | 239.0 | 203.1 |
aData are expressed as mean (standard deviation of three independent determinations. Means with the same letters (a, b, c) within the same row do not differ significantly (P > 0.05).bBelow detection limit
Sreerama et al. (2010b)
Phenolic acids are believed to work synergistically to promote human health through a variety of different mechanisms such as impacting cellular processes associated with apoptosis, platelet aggregation, blood vessel dilation, enzyme activities associated with starch, protein, and/or lipid digestion, carcinogen activation, and detoxification (McDougall and Stewart 2005). The phenolic compounds have also been associated with colour, sensory qualities (Maga 1978) and organoleptic properties (flavor, astringency, and hardness) of foods (Bravo 1999; Tan 2000).
There is growing evidence that polyphenols found in plants have potential health benefits (Akin et al. 2012). Phenolic compound have antimicrobial (Taguri et al. 2006), antimutagenic, (Lairon and Amiot 1999), antiviral (Perez 2003), anticarcinogenic (Aaby et al. 2004), anti-inflammatory (Dos Santos et al. 2006), antiproliferative and vasodilatory actions (Lule and Xia 2005) and have potential preventive properties against cardiovascular diseases, hormonal related cancers (Gupta and Abu-Ghannam 2012). In addition, to their antioxidant properties, isoflavones and lignans exert a weak oestrogenic activity (Barnes et al. 2000), which may be implicated in several mechanisms protecting the human body and also have been suggested to reduce the risks of cancer and to lower serum cholesterol (Barnes et al. 2000). Some phenolic compounds, like the flavonoids, known to have antioxidant activities (Segev et al. 2010) and are used as antibiotics, anti-diarrheal, anti-ulcer and anti-inflammatory agents, and also for treatment of diseases such as hypertension, vascular fragility, allergies, and hypercholesterolemia (Bravo 1999). Furthermore, these flavonoids are known to possess antioxidant, anticancer, antiallergic and gastroprotective properties (Sreerama et al. 2012a). The dietary antioxidants are capable of blocking neuronal death in vitro and many therapeutic properties of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases (Daniel 2003). The antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols is considered to be much greater than that of the essential vitamins (Siddhuraju and Becker 2007). Hence, the evaluation and exploitation of phyto-nutrient compounds particularly phenolic acids, flavonoids and high molecular weight tannins of legumes assumed great significance (Duranti 2006).
Flatulence factors
Raffinose family oligosaccharides (raffinose, stachyose and verbascose) α-galactosyl derivates of sucrose, a low molecular weight causes accumulation of gas, discomfort, diarrhea, pain and cramps (Phillips 1993) after digestion. The formation of flatus in human is due to absence of an enzyme α-galactosidase in the digestive tract (Reddy et al. 1984). These oligosaccharides eventually fermented in the large bowel by the action of anaerobic bacteria of clostridia group to produce gases (CO2, H2, CH4, H2S and NH2) and short-chain fatty acids (Dilis and Trichopoulou 2009). However, these oligosaccharides can be used as sources of non-digestible carbohydrates, which not only promote several beneficial physiological effects but can also selectively stimulate the growth of the colon microflora and act as prebiotics (Gupta and Abu-Ghannam 2012). In fact, many prebiotic i.e. non-digestible food ingredient, stimulate the growth and/or activity of bacteria in the digestive system such as ingredients in various food products like soft drinks, cookies, cereals, candies and infant foods (Nakakuki 2003).
The major flatulence factors in horse gram are presented in Table 4. The cotyledon fractions contain higher concentrations of oligosaccharides (raffinose, stachyose, and verbascose), accounting for 39 % of the total soluble sugars. Among the oligosaccharides, stachyose is recorded in higher amounts in both cotyledon and embryonic axe fractions, whereas, verbascose was the major oligosacharide in seed coat fractions (1.05 mg/g) in horse gram) (Sreerama et al. 2010a). However, substantial amounts of raffinose and verbascose were also found in cotyledon and embryonic axe fractions.
The presence of flatulence causing raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) limits their biological value and acceptance as a regular food item (Reddy et al. 1984). However, it is well-known fact that the balance of intestinal bacterial flora is important for human health, especially bifidobacterium, which is facilitated by galacto-oligosaccharides (Alles et al. 1999) and thus invigorate human health.
Proteinase/Enzyme inhibitors
Protease is a group of enzymes whose catalytic function is to hydrolyze (breakdown) peptide bonds of proteins. Proteases, is an indispensable for maintenance and survival of the organisms but have potentially damaging role in higher concentrations, thus its activities need to be regulated. Proteinase inhibitors play a vital role in regulating proteases (Muricken and Gowda 2010). Enzyme inhibitors are a storage protein (Richardson 1991) that binds to enzymes and decreases their activity however, on other hand it has defensive role against pests and pathogens and biomedical applications (Kennedy et al. 1993). There are ten families of proteinase inhibitors have been distinguished in plants, out of which 8 families belong to serine proteinase inhibitors while 9th and 10th belongs to metallo and cysteine inhibitor families, respectively (Richardson 1991). Trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase, chymase, cathepsin G, plasmin, thrombin, and subtilisin are classical examples of functional serine proteinases (Losso 2008). Serine proteinase inhibitors are the Kunitz type inhibitors (bovine pancreatic and soybean trypsin inhibitors), the Bowman-Birk type inhibitors (BBIs), potato type I and II inhibitors, and the Kazal type inhibitors (pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitors) (Losso 2008). Legume seeds generally contain BBIs (Richardson 1991), have single polypeptides with molecular masses in the range of 6–9 kDa (dalton) (Muricken and Gowda 2010). Bowman-Birk inhibitors (BBIs) are relatively stable to heat, acidic pH, resistance to various proteolytic enzymes (Ryan 1981) and have a tendency to self-associate forming dimers, trimers and tetramers in solution (Frokiaer et al. 1994). Protease inhibitor from the BBI, a double-headed inhibitor (Domoney et al. 1993) contains two active sites which inhibit the proteolytic enzymes trypsin and chymotrypsin.
Recently, four double headed Bowman-Birk type proteinase inhibitors which inhibits trypsin and chymotrypsin independently, were purified and characterized (Ramasarma and Rao 1991). The major BBI associated with horse gram is HGI-III that has 76-amino acid single-chain poly peptide with two independent inhibitory domains directed toward trypsin and chymotrypsin (Sreerama et al. 1997). HGI-III, though a single polypeptide of low molecular weight (∼8,600 Da) and like other BBIs it undergoes self-association and exists as a dimer in solution (Kumar et al. 2004). In contrast to HGI-III, the three inhibitors of germinated horse gram seeds (HGGIs) are single polypeptides of 6,500–7,200 Da that exist as monomers and exhibit no such self-association (Kumar et al. 2002). HGI-III like other legume BBIs is stable at cooking temperatures (Muricken and Gowda 2010) and also exhibits remarkable stability to high temperature (95 °C) as well as extremes of pH from 2 to 12 (Sreerama et al. 1997). HGI-III contains seven inter-weaving disulfides and among these seven disulfides, four occur in the trypsin and three in the chymotrypsin reactive site domain, respectively (Kumar and Gowda 2013a, b). Proteinase inhibitors in horse gram (Table 4) revealed that buffer extracts showed higher proteinase inhibitors in cotyledon fractions than that of embryonic axe and seed coat fractions but methanol extracts showed higher proteinase inhibitors in seed coat fractions than that of cotyledon and embryonic axe fractions (Sreerama et al. 2010a). Horse gram having higher trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA) (9,856 TIA/g) could be used as functional food ingredients, similar to soybean BBI concentrate (Blanca et al. 2009).
BBIs have more recently been acknowledged to be helpful for human health, by their ability to suppress carcinogenesis (Chen et al. 2005; Clemente and Domoney 2006) due to intrinsic ability of BBI to inhibit serine proteases which involved in carcinogenesis (Kumar and Gowda 2013a). The BBIs have potential anti-inflammatory activity, against obesity and several degenerative and autoimmune diseases (Duranti 2006). BBI concentrate (BBIC) recently been used as treating ulcerative colitis (Gary et al. 2008) and multiple sclerosis (Gran et al. 2006). Horse gram having higher trypsin inhibitor activity (9,856 TIA/g) could be used as functional food ingredients similar to soybean BBI concentrate (Blanca et al. 2009).
Conclusions
After critical assessment of nutritional and therapeutic aspect of horse gram, it can now be concluded that-it is a rich source of nutrient and antinutrient content. The nutritional value of horse gram is comparable with other pulse crop. Horse gram has high levels of antioxidant and radical scavenging activities in addition to their traditional role of providing proteins and carbohydrates. It has rich source of various natural bioactive substances such as phytic acid, fiber, phenolic acid etc. These bioactive substances have immense potential for curing varieties of diseases such as common cold, throat infection, fever, urinary stones, asthma, bronchitis, leucoderma, etc. BBIs, the proteinase inhibitors have been identified to treat anti-inflammatory, obesity and several degenerative and autoimmune diseases. However, there is a dearth of information on the specific health beneficial components in this lesser known legume. Thus, considering its immense potential as health benefit it needs to exploit as a source of nutraceutical and food industries.
Contributor Information
Saroj Kumar Prasad, Email: skprasadagro@gmail.com.
Manoj Kumar Singh, Phone: +91-945-0467713, FAX: +91-542-2368381, Email: manoj.agro@bhu.ac.in, Email: manozsingh@rediffmail.com.
References
- Aaby K, Hvattum E, Skrede G. Analysis of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric array detection: relationship to antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:4595–4603. doi: 10.1021/jf0352879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Acharya SN, Thomas JE. Advances in medicinal plant research. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Achaya KT. A historical dictionary of Indian food. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Aiyer YN. Horse gram. In: Aiyer YN, editor. Field crops of India. 7. Banglore: Bangalore Press; 1990. pp. 115–117. [Google Scholar]
- Akin Ŏ, Temelli F, Kőseoğlu S. Membrane applications in functional foods and nutraceuticals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52:347–371. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.500240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alles MS, Hartemink R, Meyboom S, Harryvan JL, Van La ere K, Nagengast FM. Effect of transgalactooligo-saccharides on the composition of the human intestinal microflora and on putative risk markers for colon cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:980–991. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson JW, Bridge SR. Dietary fiber content of selected foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47:440–447. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.3.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson JW, Smith BM, Gustafson NJ. Health benefits and practical aspects of high-fiber diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:1242S–1247S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1242S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arinathan V, Mohan VR, De Britto AJ. Chemical composition of certain tribal pulses in south India. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2003;54:209–217. doi: 10.1080/09637480120092026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asp N-G, Van Amelsvoort JMM, Hautvast JGAJ. Nutritional implications of resistant starch. Nutr Res Rev. 1996;9:1–31. doi: 10.1079/NRR19960004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajpai RP, Dwivedi RK, Singh VK. Performance of horsegram on different dates of sowing, phosphorus levels and intercropping. Indian J Pulses Res. 1990;3(2):159–162. [Google Scholar]
- Barnes S, Boersma B, Patel R. Isoflavonoids and chronic disease: mechanisms of action. Biofactors. 2000;12:209–215. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520120133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bazzano L, He J, Ogden LG, Loria C, Vuputuri S, Myers L. Legume consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2573–2578. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.21.2573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belem MAF. Application of biotechnology in the product development of nutraceuticals in Canada. Trends Food Sci Tech. 1999;10(3):101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Bhardwaj J, Yadav SK (2012) Comparative study on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in a drought tolerant and sensitive variety of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) under drought stress. Am J Plant Physiol 7:17–29
- Blanca HL, Hsieh CC, Lumen BOD. Lunacin and Bowman - Birk protease inhibitor (BBI) in US commercial soy foods. Food Chem. 2009;115:574–580. [Google Scholar]
- Brand JC, Snow BJ, Nobhan GP, Truswell AS. Plasma glucose and insulin responses to traditional Pima Indian meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:416–420. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/51.3.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo L. Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism and nutritional significance. Nutr Rev. 1999;56:317–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo L, Siddhuraju P, Saura-Calixto F. Effect of various processing methods on the in vitro starch digestibility and resistant starch content of Indian pulses. J Agr Food Chem. 1998;46:4667–4674. [Google Scholar]
- Bravo L, Siddhuraju P, Saura-Calixto F. Composition of underexploited Indian pulses. Comparison with common legumes. Food Chem. 1999;64:185–192. [Google Scholar]
- Brink M. Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc. In: Brink M, Belay G, editors. PROTA 1: cereals and pulses/céréales et légumes secs. Wageningen: PROTA; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Brower V. Nutraceuticals: poised for a healthy slice of the healthcare market? Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:728–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt0898-728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardador-Martinez A, Loarca-Pina G, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:6975–6980. doi: 10.1021/jf020296n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatterton DEW, Smithers G, Roupas P, Brodkorb A. Bioactivity of beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactalbumin – Technological implications for processing. Int Dairy J. 2006;16(11):1229–1240. [Google Scholar]
- Chel-Guerrero L, Perez-Flores V, Bentacur-Ancona D, Davila-Ortiz G. Functional properties of flours and protein isolates from Phaseolus lunatus and Canavalia ensiformis seeds. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:584–591. doi: 10.1021/jf010778j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen YW, Huang SC, Shiau SYL, Lin JK. Bowman –Birk inhibitor abates proteosome function and suppresses the proliferation of MCF7 breast cancer cells through accumulation of MAP kinase phosphatase-1. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1296–1306. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chitra U, Vimala V, Singh U, Geervani P. Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 1995;47:163–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01089266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chunekar KC, Pandey GS. Bhavaprakash Nighantu (Indian Materia Medica) of Sri Bhavamisra (c. 1500–1600 AD) Varanasi: Chaukhamba Bharati Academy; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Clemente A, Domoney C. Biological significance of polymorphism in legume protease inhibitors from the Bowman – Birk family. Curr Protein Pep Sci. 2006;7:201–216. doi: 10.2174/138920306777452349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cook BG, Pengelly BC, Brown SD, Donnelly JL, Eagles DA, Franco MA, Hanson J, Mullen BF, Partridge IJ, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. [CD-ROM], CSIRO, DPI&F(Qld) Brisbane: CIAT and ILRI; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings JH, Stephen AM (2007) Carbohydrate terminology and classification. Eur J Clin Nutr 61(Suppl. 1): 5–18 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Cummings JH, Bingham S, Heaton KW, Eastwood MA. Faecal weight colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fibre) Gasteroenterology. 1992;103:1783–1789. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91435-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daniel S (2003) An investigation into the neuroprotective prospective of curcumin. Rhodes University. Electronic thesis collection TR 03–17
- Davis KR. Effect of processing on composition of tetrahymena relative nutritive value on green and yellow peas, lentils and white pea beans. Cereal Chem. 1981;58:454–460. [Google Scholar]
- Dilis V, Trichopoulou A. Nutritional and health properties of pulses. Mediterr J Nutr Metab. 2009;1:149–157. [Google Scholar]
- Dillard CJ, German JB. Phytochemicals: nutraceuticals and human health. J Food Agric Sci. 2000;80(12):1744–1756. [Google Scholar]
- Domoney C, Welham T, Sidebottom C. Purification and characterization of Pisum seed trypsin inhibitor. J Exp Bot. 1993;261:701–709. [Google Scholar]
- Dos Santos MD, Almeida MC, Lopes NP, de Souza GEP. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity of the natural polyphenol chlorogenic acid. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29:2236–2240. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duranti M. Grain legume proteins and nutraceutical properties. Fitoterapia. 2006;77:67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duranti M, Gius C. Legume seeds: protein content and nutritional value. Field Crop Res. 1997;53:31–45. [Google Scholar]
- Eggum BO, Beames RM. The nutritive value of seed protein. In: Gottschalk W, Müller HP, editors. Seed proteins: biochemistry, genetics, nutritive value. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1983. pp. 499–531. [Google Scholar]
- Frokiaer H, Horlyck L, Sorenson S, Sorenson H. Immunoaffmity chromatography, purification and characterization of pea trypsin inhibitors. J Sci Food Agric. 1994;66:61–69. [Google Scholar]
- Gary RL, Julius JD, Seymour K, James DL, Kennedy AR, Ware JH. Bowman –Birk inhibitor concentrate: a novel therapeutic agent for patients with active ulcerative colitis. Digest Dis Sci. 2008;53:175–180. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9840-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghani A. Medicinal plants of Bangladesh: chemical constituents and uses. 2. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh; 2003. pp. 5–16. [Google Scholar]
- Gopalan C, Sastri B, Rama V, Balasubramanian SC. Nutritive value of Indian foods. ICMR. Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition; 1989. pp. 110–125. [Google Scholar]
- Graf E, Eaton JW. Antioxidant functions of phytic acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;8:61–69. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(90)90146-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gran B, Tabibzadeh N, Martin A, Ventura ES, Ware JH, Zhang GX, Parr JL, Kennedy AR, Rostami AM. The protease inhibitor, Bowman–Birk Inhibitor, sup-pressesexperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a potential oral therapy for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12:688–697. doi: 10.1177/1352458506070769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Granfeldt Y, Liljeberg H, Drews A, Newman R, Bjorck IM. Glucose and insulin responses to barley products. Influence of food structure and amylose-amylopectin ratio. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:1075–1082. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta S, Abu-Ghannam N. Probiotic fermentation of plant based products: possibilities and opportunities. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52:183–199. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.499779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta SK, Sharma PK, Ansari SH. Antimicrobial activity of Dolichos biflorus seeds. Indian J Nat Prod. 2005;21:20–21. [Google Scholar]
- Handa G, Singh J, Nandi LN, Sharma ML, Kaul A. Pyroglutaminylgltamine- a new diurectic principle from Dolichos biflorus seeds. Indian J Chem, Sec B. 1990;29:1156–1158. [Google Scholar]
- Harris RA, Joshi M, Jeoung NH, Obayashi M. Overview of the molecular and biochemical basis of branched-chain amino acid catabolism. J Nutr. 2005;135(6):1527S–1530S. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1527S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasler CM. The changing face of functional food. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19(5):499S–506S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hudson BJF, El-Difrawi EA. The Sapogenins of the seeds of four lupinspecies. J Plant Food. 1979;3:181–186. [Google Scholar]
- Jones JR, Lineback DM, Levine MJ. Dietary reference intakes: implications for fiber labeling and consumption: a summary of the International Life Sciences Institute North American Fiber Workshop, June 1–2, 2004.Washington, DC. Nutr Rev. 2006;64:31–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawale SB, Kadam SS, Chavan UD, Chavan JK. Effect of processing on insoluble dietary fiber and resistant starch in kidney bean and horse gram. J Food Sci Technol. 2005;42:361–362. [Google Scholar]
- Kawsar SMA, Rahman MR, Huq E, Mosihuzzaman M, Nahar N, Mamun MIR. Studies of different extractives of Macrotyloma uniflorum. Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci. 2003;2:81–84. [Google Scholar]
- Kawsar SMA, Huq E, Nahar N, Ozeki Y. Identification and quantification of phenolic acids in Macrotyloma uniflorum by reversed phase-HPLC. Am J Plant Physiol. 2008;3(4):165–172. [Google Scholar]
- Kawsar SMA, Mostafa G, Huq E, Nahar N, Ozeki Y. Chemical constituents and hemolytic activity of Macrotyloma uniflorum L. Int J Biol Chem. 2009;3:42–48. [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy A, Billings P, Maki A, Newberne P. Effects of various preparations of dietary protease inhibitors on oral carcinogenesis in hamster induced by DMBA. Nutr Cancer. 1993;19:191–200. doi: 10.1080/01635589309514249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko KM, Godin DV. Effects of phytic acid on the myoglobin-t-butylhydroperoxide-catalysed oxidation of uric acid and peroxidation of erythrocyte membrane lipids. Mol Cell Biochem. 1991;101:23–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00238434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koratkar R, Rao AV (1997) Effect of soybean saponins on azoxymethane-induced preneoplastic lesions in the colon of mice. Nutr Cancer 27:206–209 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kumar V, Gowda LR. The contribution of two disulfide bonds in the trypsin binding domain of horsegram (Dolichos biflorus) Bowman-Birk inhibitor to thermal stability and functionality. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;537:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar V, Gowda LR. Production of horsegram (Dolichos biflorus) Bowman-Birk inhibitor by an intein mediated protein purification system. Protein Express Purif. 2013;89:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar P, Sreerama YN, Gowda LR. Formation of Bowman – Birk inhibitors during the germination of horsegram (Dolichos biflorus) Phytochemistry. 2002;60:581–588. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar P, Appu Rao AG, Hariharaputran S, Chandra N, Gowda LR. Molecular mechanism of dimerisation of Bowman–Birk inhibitors, pivotal role of Asp76 in the dimerization. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:30425–30432. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402972200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lairon D, Amiot MJ. Flavonoids in food and natural antioxidants in wine. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:23–28. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199902000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lajolo FM, Saura-Calixto F, Penna EW, Menezes EW. Fibra dietética en Iberoamérica: tecnología y salud: obtención, caracterización, efecto fisiológico y aplicación en alimentos. São Paulo: Livraria Varela; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Leterme P. Recommendations by health organizations for pulse consumption. Brit J Nutr. 2002;88(Supplement 3):S239–S242. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lori O, Thava V, James HH. Phytic acid. Food Rev Int. 2001;17(4):419–431. [Google Scholar]
- Losso JN. The biochemical and functional food properties of the Bowman-Birk inhibitor. Crit Rev Food Sc Nutr. 2008;48:94–118. doi: 10.1080/10408390601177589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lule SU, Xia W. Food phenolics, pros and coin: a review. Food Rev Int. 2005;21:367–388. [Google Scholar]
- Maga JA. Simple phenol and phenolic compounds in food flavor. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1978;10:323–372. doi: 10.1080/10408397809527255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malhotra SL. Faecal urobilinogen levels and pH of stools in population groups with different incidence of cancer of the colon and their possible role in its etiology. J Roy Soc Med. 1982;75:709–714. doi: 10.1177/014107688207500907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marathe SA, Rajalakshmi V, Jamdar SN, Sharma A. Comparative study on antioxidant activity of different varieties of commonly consumed legumes in India. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:2005–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markievicz M, Kolanowka A, Gulewics K. The chemical composition of debittered lupine seeds and their extract. Bull Pol Acad Sci Biol Sci. 1988;36:1–3. [Google Scholar]
- McDougall GJ, Stewart D. The inhibitory effects of berry polyphenols on digestive enzymes. Biofactors. 2005;23:189–195. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520230403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mehra KL. History of crop cultivation in pre-historic India. In: Choudhary SL, Sharma GS, Nene YL, editors. Ancient and medieval history of Indian agriculture and its relevance to sustainable agriculture in the 21st century. Udaipur: Rajasthan College of Agriculture; 2000. pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Messina MJ. Legume and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(Suppl):439S–449S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.439s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris JB. Macrotyloma axillare and M. uniflorum; descriptor analysis, anthocyanin indexes and potential uses. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2008;55:5–8. [Google Scholar]
- Motsei ML, Lindsey KL, Van Staden J, Jaeger AK. Screening of traditionally used South African plants for antifungal activity against Candida albicans. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;86:235–241. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muricken DG, Gowda LR. Functional expression of horsegram (Dolichos biflorus) Bowman – Birk inhibitor and its self-association. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804:1413–1423. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naik RG. Effect of date of sowing on disease incidence and yields of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) Lamverdec. Legume Res. 2001;24(3):182–185. [Google Scholar]
- Nakakuki T. Development of functional oligosaccharides in Japan. Trends Glycosci Glyc. 2003;15:57–64. [Google Scholar]
- Neelam DA. Identification and quantification of nutraceuticals from bengal gram and horse gram seed coat. Dissertation for Bachelor of Technology. India: Department of Biotechnology, Sathyabama University Chennai (India); 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Norazalina S, Norhaizan ME, Hairuszah I, Norashareena MS. Anticarcinogenic efficacy of phytic acid extracted from rice bran on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010;62:259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oku T. Oligosaccharides with beneficial health effects: a Japanese perspective. Nutr Rev. 1996;54:S59–S66. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paśko P, Bartoń H, Zagrodzki P, Gorinstein S, Fołta M, Zachwieja Z. Anthocyanins., total polyphenols and antioxidant activity in amaranth and quinoa seeds and sprouts during their growth. Food Chem. 2009;115:994–998. [Google Scholar]
- Patwardhan B, Warude D, Pushpangadan P, Bhatt N. Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine: a comparative overview. eCAM. 2005;2(4):465–473. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neh140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez RM. Antiviral activity of compounds isolated from plants. Pharm Biol. 2003;41:107–157. [Google Scholar]
- Perumal S, Sellamuthu M. The antioxidant activity and free radical-scavenging capacity of dietary phenolic extracts from horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) seeds. Food Chem. 2007;105:950–958. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips RD. Starchy legumes in human nutrition, health and culture. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 1993;44:195–211. doi: 10.1007/BF01088314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porres JM, Stahl CH, Cheng WH. Dietary intrinsic phytate protects colon from lipid peroxidation in pigs with a moderately high dietary iron intake. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1999;221:80–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-57.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prosky L, DeVries JW. Controlling dietary fiber in food products. In: Gottschalk W, Muller HP, editors. Proteins. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991. pp. 499–531. [Google Scholar]
- Purseglove JW (1974) Dolichos uniflorus. In: Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons, Longman, London, pp 263–264
- Ramasarma PR, Rao DR. Nature of the tryptic chymotryptic inhibitor from horse gram (Dolichos biflorus) Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1991;28:418–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramesh CK, Abdul R, Prabhakar BT, Vijay Avin BR, Aditya Rao SJ. Antioxidant potentials in sprouts vs. seeds of Vigna radiata and Macrotyloma uniflorum. JAPS. 2011;01(07):99–103. [Google Scholar]
- Ramulu P, Udayasekhararao P. Effect of processing on dietary fiber content of cereals and pulses. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 1997;50:249–257. doi: 10.1007/BF02436061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao PS, Liu XK, Das DK, Weinstein GS, Tyras DH. Protection of ischemic heart from reperfusion injury by myo-inositol hexaphosphate, a natural antioxidant. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:908–912. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91254-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raskin I, Ribnicky DM, Komarnytsky S, Ilic N, Poulev A, Borisjuk N, Brinker A, Moreno DA, Ripoll C, Yakoby N, O’Neal JM, Cornwell T, Pastor I, Fridlender B. Plants and human health in the twenty first century. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20:522–531. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)02080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravishankar K, Vishnu Priya PS. In Vitro antioxidant activity of ethanolic seed extracts of macrotyloma uniflorum and cucumis melo for therapeutic potential. IJRPC. 2012;2(2):442–445. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy BS. Prevention of colon carcinogenesis by components of dietary fiber. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:3681–3683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy NRR, Pierson MD, Sathe SK. Chemical, nutritional and physiological aspects of dry bean carbohydrates—a review. Food Chem. 1984;13:25–68. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy PS, Ramanjulu S, Sudhakar C, Veeranjaneyulu K. Differential sensitivity of stomatal and non-stomatal components of NaCl or Na2SO4 salinity in horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Photosynthetica. 1998;35:99–105. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy AM, Kumar SG, Jyothsnakumari G, Thimmanaik S, Sudhakar C. Lead induced changes in antioxidant metabolism of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) and bengalgram (Cicer arietinum L.) Chemosphere. 2005;60:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy PCO, Sairanganayakulu G, Thippeswamy M, Sudhakar R, Reddy P, Sudhakar C. Identification of stress-induced genes from the drought tolerant semi-arid legume crop horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) through analysis of subtracted expressed sequence tags. Plant Sci. 2008;175(3):372–384. [Google Scholar]
- Redgwell RJ, Fischer M. Dietary fiber as a versatile food component: an industrial perspective. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005;49(6):521–535. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson M. The complete amino acid sequence of the major Kunitz trypsin inhibitor from the seeds of Prosopis juliflora. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:2829–2833. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)98207-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rickard SE, Thompson LU. Interactions and biological effects of phytic acid. In: Shahidi F, editor. Antinutrients and phytochemicals in food. ACS symposium series No. 662. Washington: American Chemical Society; 1997. pp. 294–312. [Google Scholar]
- Russo S, Kema IP, Fokkema R, Boon JC, Willemse PHB, de Vries EGE, den Boer JA, Korf J. Tryptophan as a link between psychopathology and somatic states. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(4):665–671. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000078188.74020.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan CA. Proteinase inhibitors. In: Marcus A, editor. The biochemistry of plants. New York: Academic; 1981. pp. 357–370. [Google Scholar]
- Sandberg A-S (2002) Bioavailability of minerals in legumes. Brit J Nutr 88 (Suppl. 3): S281–S285 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Savithramma DL, Shambulingappa KG. Genetic divergence studies in horse gram Macrotyloma uniflorum (L.) Verdec. Mysore J Agric Sci. 1996;30:223–229. [Google Scholar]
- Scheppach W, Bartram HP, Richter F. Role of short-chain fatty acids in the prevention of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1077–1088. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00165-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Oren-Shamir M, Galili S. Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) J Food Sci. 2010;75:S115–S119. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severin S, Xia WS. Milk biologically active components as nutraceuticals: review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2005;45(7–8):645–656. doi: 10.1080/10408690490911756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seyler JE, Wildman REC, Layman DK. Protein as a functional food ingredient for weight loss and maintaining body composition. In: Wildman REC, editor. Handbook of nutraceuticals and functional foods. 2. Boco Raton: CRC Press; 2007. pp. 391–407. [Google Scholar]
- Shamsuddin AM, Vucenik I, Cole KE. IP6: a novel anticancer agent. Life Sci. 1997;61:343–354. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma M, Kawatra A. Effect of dietary fibre from cereal brans and legume seed coats on serum lipids in rats. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 1995;47:287–292. doi: 10.1007/BF01088265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siddhuraju P, Becker K. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of processed cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) seed extracts. Food Chem. 2007;101:10–19. [Google Scholar]
- Smartt J. Evolution of grain legumes II. Old and new world pulses of lesser economic importance. Exp Agric. 1985;21:1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Sodani SN, Paliwal RV, Jain LK. Phenotypic stability for seed yield in rainfed Horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum [Lam.] Verdc). Paper presented in National Symposium on Arid Legumes for Sustainable Agriculture and Trade, 5–7 Nov., 2004. Jodhpur: Central Arid Zone Research Institute; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Soobrattee MA, Neergheen VS, Luximon-Ramma A, Aruomab OI, Bahorun T. Phenolics as potential antioxidant therapeutic agents: mechanism and actions. Mutat Res. 2005;579:200–213. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiller GA. Dietary fiber in prevention and treatment of disease. In: Spiller GA, editor. CRC handbook of dietary fiber in human nutrition. Washington: CRC Press LLC; 2001. pp. 363–431. [Google Scholar]
- Sreerama YN, Das JR, Rao DR, Gowda LR. Double-headed trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitors from horse gram (Dolichos biflorus): purification, molecular and kinetic properties. J Food Biochem. 1997;21:461–477. [Google Scholar]
- Sreerama YN, Dennis A, Neelam, Vadakkoot BS, Vishwas MP. Distribution of nutrients and antinutrients in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: Seed coat phenolics and their distinct modes of enzyme inhibition. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(7):4322–4330. doi: 10.1021/jf903101k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sreerama YN, Vadakkoot BS, Vishwas MP. Variability in the distribution of phenolic compounds in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: evaluation of their antioxidant properties. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:8322–8330. doi: 10.1021/jf101335r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanley DW, Aguilera JM. A review of textural defects in cooked reconstituted legumes: the influence of structure and composition. J Food Biochem. 1985;9:277–323. [Google Scholar]
- Sundaram U, Marimuthu M, Anupama V, Gurumoorthi P (2013) Comparative antioxidant quality evaluation of underutilized/less common south Indian legumes. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 4(2):117–126
- Taguri T, Tanaka T, Kouno I. Antibacterial spectrum of plant polyphenols and extracts depending upon hydroxyphenyl structure. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29:2226–2235. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan SC. Determinants of eating quality in fruits and vegetables. Proc Nutr Soc Aust. 2000;24:183–190. [Google Scholar]
- Thirumaran AS, Kanchana S (2000) Role of pulses in human diets. In: Pulses production strategies in Tamil Nadu. Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, pp 129. http://www.tnau.ac.in/tech/pulsesbook.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2012
- Thompson LU. Potential health benefits and problems associated with antinutrients in foods. Food Res Int. 1993;26:131–149. [Google Scholar]
- Turner BL, Paphazy JM, Haygarth MP, Mckelvie DI. Inositol phosphate in the environment. Online J R Soc. 2002;357:449–469. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udensi EA, Ekwu FC, Isinguzo JN. Antinutrient factors of vegetable cowpea (Sesquipedalis) seeds during thermal processing. PJN. 2007;6:194–197. [Google Scholar]
- Urbano G, Lopez-Jurado M, Aranda P, Vidal-Valverde C, Tenorio E, Porres J. The role of phytic acid in legumes: antinutrient or beneficial function. J Physiol Biochem. 2000;56:283–294. doi: 10.1007/BF03179796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Utsumi S. Plant food protein engineering. Adv Food Nutr Res. 1992;36:89–208. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4526(08)60105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead RG, Young GP, Bhathal PS. Effect of short chain fatty acids on new human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM 1215) Gut. 1986;27:1457–1463. doi: 10.1136/gut.27.12.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witcombe JR, Billore M, Singhal HC, Patel NB, Tikka SBS, Saini DP, Sharma LK, Sharma R, Yadav SK, Yadavendra JP. Improving the food security of low-resource farmers: introducing horsegram into maize-based cropping systems. Expl Agric. 2008;44:339–348. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav S, Negi KS, Mandal S. Protein and oil rich wild horsegram. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2004;51:629–633. [Google Scholar]
- Yadava ND, Vyas NL. Arid legumes. India: Agrobios; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Zeven AC, de Wet JMJ. Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publication and Documentation; 1982. [Google Scholar]
