Abstract
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a major clinical challenge for which no cure is currently available primarily because of the lack of proper understanding about appropriate molecular target(s). Previously we observed that inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase (5-Lox) activity induces apoptosis in some types of prostate cancer cells, suggesting an important role of 5-Lox in the viability of prostate cancer cells. However, nothing is known about the role of 5-Lox in the survival of castration-resistant, metastatic prostate cancer cells. Thus, we tested the effects of MK591, a second-generation, specific inhibitor of 5-Lox activity, on the viability and metastatic characteristics of CRPC cells. We observed that MK591 effectively kills the bone-invading C4-2B human prostate cancer cells (which bear characteristics of CRPC), but does not affect normal, non-cancer fibroblasts (which do not express 5-Lox) in the same experimental conditions. We also observed that MK591 dramatically inhibits the in vitro invasion and soft-agar colony formation of C4-2B cells. Interestingly, we found that treatment with MK591 dramatically down-regulates the expression of c-Myc and its targets at sub-lethal doses. In light of frequent over-activation of c-Myc in a spectrum of aggressive cancers (including CRPC), and the challenges associated with inhibition of c-Myc (because of its non-enzymatic nature), our novel findings of selective killing, and blockade of invasive and soft-agar colony-forming abilities of the castration-resistant, bone-metastatic C4-2B prostate cancer cells by MK591, open up a new avenue to attack CRPC cells for better management of advanced prostate cancer while sparing normal, non-cancer body cells.
Introduction
The American cancer society estimates that during the year 2014, about 233,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in the United States and about 29,480 will die from the disease which makes prostate cancer the most common form of malignancy and second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in American men [1]. Considerable advances in screening and diagnosis allowed detecting prostate cancer at early stage for which the therapeutic options are curative including surgery and radiation [2–4]. Current androgen deprivation therapy by decreasing circulating testosterone effectively shrinks androgen-dependent prostate tumors. However, in spite of initial positive response, most men ultimately fail to this therapy. Moreover, continuous androgen deprivation usually leads to recurrent castration-resistant prostate cancer which is a major clinical challenge in the management of prostate cancer [5,6]. CRPC patients who have failed hormone deprivation therapy are treated with standard docetaxel-based combination chemotherapy. However, only limited improvement in survival was observed in these patients at the cost of a huge compromise with the quality of life [7], and there is no effective therapy for disseminated, late-stage prostate cancer. Since, the development of CRPC is causally linked to high prostate cancer mortality, now a great deal of emphasis is on development of new therapeutic strategies for the management of CRPC. However, lack of proper understanding about the biology of CRPC cells is hampering the development of effective therapies which are urgently needed in the clinic.
A key to the development of effective therapy against CRPC is the identification and characterization of molecular targets which play critical roles in the survival and growth characteristics of CRPC cells. Epidemiological studies and animal experiments repeatedly suggested a link between high-fat diets and occurrence of clinical prostate cancer [8–13]. Moreover, a strong association between arachidonic acid and the risk of metastatic prostate cancer has been reported [14–16]. We and others have observed that, arachidonic acid, an omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid, promotes growth and survival of prostate cancer cells via metabolic conversion through the 5-Lox pathway [17–19]. Previous studies in our laboratory documented that prostate cancer cells continuously generate 5-Lox metabolites, and inhibition of 5-Lox blocks production of 5-Lox metabolites and induces apoptosis [20,21]. Interestingly, inhibition of 5-Lox was found to kill both androgen-receptor positive as well as androgen-receptor negative prostate cancer cells. Also, prevention of apoptosis by exogenous 5-Lox metabolite 5(S)-HETE and more effectively by its dehydrogenase-derivative 5-oxoETE strongly suggest that 5-Lox plays a critical role in the survival of prostate cancer cells. Recently, we have found that 5-Lox inhibition-induced apoptosis occurs via down-regulation of PKCε, without inhibiting AKT or ERK (which are also characterized as regulators of pro-survival mechanisms), suggesting the existence of an AKT-and ERK-independent survival mechanism in prostate cancer cells regulated by 5-Lox activity [22,23].
Based on previous studies in our laboratory which demonstrated that inhibition of 5-Lox kills a range of prostate cancer cell lines without regard to their androgen receptor status, we hypothesized that 5-Lox may be a potential target for therapy of heterogeneous lethal forms of prostate cancer as well. Hence, we wanted to further analyze the effect of 5-Lox inhibition on the LNCaP human prostate cancer cell-derived C4-2B cells which still retain the androgen receptor, but are refractory to androgen stimulation. These cells were isolated from metastatic prostate cancer lesions found in the lumbar spine of athymic murine host and closely mimic cellular features of clinical bone-metastatic prostate cancer, and when injected orthotopically, C4-2B cells produce osteoblastic metastases in the lumbar bone [24]. Thus, the C4-2B cell line provides us with a model to explore potential effects of 5-Lox inhibitors for therapy of CRPC. In the present study, we observed that MK591, a second-generation, specific inhibitor of 5-Lox activity [25–29], effectively blocks the in vitro invasion and soft-agar colony formation, and triggers apoptosis in C4-2B prostate cancer cells in a dose and time-dependent manner. Moreover, we observed that MK591 activates phosphorylation of c-JNK, induces mitochondrial permeability transition, and triggers degradation of chromatin DNA to nucleosomal fragments. Interestingly, while MK591 exerts a strong effect on C4-2B prostate cancer cells, it does not kill normal, non-cancer human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) which do not express 5-Lox in them. Altogether, these findings suggest that the 5-Lox inhibitor, MK591, may be effective for prevention and therapy of castration-resistant, bone-metastatic, lethal form of prostate cancer.
Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell culture and reagents
Normal human foreskin fibroblasts and C4-2B human prostate cancer cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Fibroblasts and C4-2B cells were grown in DMEM and RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 10% fetal bovine serum respectively. All the media were supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and cell cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere. Antibodies against PARP, PKCε, cyclin D1, CDK4, Bcl-2 and XIAP were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Polyclonal anti-5-Lox antibody was purchased from ProteinTech (Chicago, IL). Anti-survivin antibody was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN). Polyclonal antibodies against Akt, phospho-Akt (Ser473), phospho-JNK (Thr183/Y185) and JNK were purchased from cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-beta-actin antibody, docetaxel and ibuprofen were purchased from Sigma Chemical CO (St. Louis, MO). SP600125 and U0126 were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). MK591 was obtained as a generous gift from Dr. Robert N. Young (Merck-Frosst Centre for Therapeutic Research, Quebec, Canada).
2.2 Microscopy
C4-2B cells (~3 x 105) were plated in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS onto 60 mm diameter tissue culture plates (Falcon) and allowed to grow for 48 h. On the day of experiment, the spent culture medium was replaced with 2 ml fresh RPMI medium with 10% FBS and cells were treated with inhibitors. Control cells were treated with the solvent (DMSO) only. HFF were plated in DMEM and treated with inhibitors in the same way as C4-2B cells. After 72 hours, photographs were taken with a Nikon digital camera attached to a LEICA fluorescence microscope at x200. Image acquisition and data processing were done with a DELL computer attached to the microscope using Q-Capture Pro7 software.
2.3. Cell viability assay
C4-2B prostate cancer and human foreskin fibroblast cells (~3000 per well) were plated overnight in 96 well plates in complete growth medium (RPMI or DMEM plus 10% FBS) and treated with varying doses of MK591. Plates were incubated further for 72 h at 37 °C in the CO2 incubator. Cell viability was measured by One Solution MTS/PES Cell Titer assay from Promega (Madison, WI) as described before [17,23].
2.4. Annexin-V binding
C4-2B prostate cancer cells (~3×105) were plated in RPMI medium and allowed to grow for 48 h. The spent culture medium was replaced with fresh 2 ml RPMI medium and the cells were treated with MK591 or ibuprofen for 24 h at 37°C. Then the cells in the plate were treated with FITC-labeled annexin-V and propidium-iodide (PI) for 15min in the dark following a protocol supplied by the manufacturer with the Annexin V-Binding Detection Kit (BD Biosciences). After washing, cells were photographed with a Nikon digital camera attached to a Leica fluorescence microscope at x200. Image acquisition and data processing were done with a Dell computer attached to the microscope using Q-Capture Pro7 software.
2.5. Western blot
C4-2B cells (~3×105) were plated in 60 mm diameter plates and allowed to grow for 48 hours. The old medium was then replaced with 2 ml fresh RPMI medium and the cells were treated with inhibitors. After treatment, cells were harvested, washed, and lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium-fluoride, 1% NP-40, and a cocktail of protease inhibitors). Proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk solution and then blotted with appropriate primary antibody followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody. Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit from Pierce Biotech (Rockford, IL). Unless otherwise mentioned, blots of proteins of interest were analyzed in three separate experiments.
2.6. Measurement of DNA degradation
Apoptosis was quantitatively measured by detecting degradation of nuclear DNA to nucleosomal fragments by sandwich-ELISA. C4-2B cells (~3×105) were plated in 60 mm dishes and allowed to grow for 48 h. Then, the cells were treated either with the experimental agents at varying concentrations or the solvent vehicle for 24 h. At the end of incubation periods, cells were harvested, lysed and the degradation of chromatin-DNA to nucleosomal fragments was measured by a Cell Death Detection ELISA plus kit from Roche (Indianapolis, IN) as described before [20–23].
2.7. Measurement of mitochondrial trans-membrane potential
C4-2B cells (~3 x 105) were plated in 60 mm diameter culture dishes (Falcon) for 48 hours and then treated either with experimental agent or solvent vehicle for 16 hours at 37°C. Then the cells in the plate were treated with Mito-Tracker Red Dye for 15 minutes in the dark using Vybrant Apoptosis assay kit following a protocol supplied by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes). Then, the cells were counterstained with blue-fluorescent DAPI DNA-binding dye (Sigma). After washing, cells were photographed with a Nikon digital camera attached to a Leica fluorescence microscope at x200. Image acquisition and data processing were done with a Dell computer attached to the microscope using Q-Capture Pro7 software.
2.8. Boyden chamber invasion assay
Matrigel inserts (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD) were adapted for room temperature and rehydrated with 50 μl serum-free RPMI-1640 medium. Then, ~50,000 C4-2B cells (re-suspended in 100 μl serum-free RPMI with different concentration of inhibitors) were carefully seeded on the soaked matrigel in the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with 500 μl RPMI plus 2% serum and inhibitors. Then the matrigel invasion chambers were incubated for 16 hours at 37°C in the CO2 incubator. After incubation, non-invading cells are removed from the upper surface of the membrane by scrubbing with sterile cotton swab moistened with medium. Then the cells were fixed by 70% ethanol and stained with crystal violet. After air dry, membrane from the inserts were removed and mounted on microscope slides. Stained cells were then photographed at x400, and the total number of invaded cells counted in triplicates.
2.9. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from confluent cultures of HFF (human foreskin fibroblasts) and C4-2B cells using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Maryland, USA). cDNA was synthesized using 2 μg of total RNA with SuperScript III First-Stand Synthesis Supermix (Invitrogen). The primers for 5-Lox were 5’-CCCGGGGCATGGAGAGCA-3’ (Forward) and 5’-GCGGTCGGGCAGCGTGTC-3’ (Reverse). The beta actin primers were 5’-CTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCACAT-3’ (forward) and 5’-AACCGCGAGAAGATGACCCAG-3’ (Reverse). The PCR conditions were as follows, For 5-Lox: 1 min at 94°C, 36 cycles of 15 Sec at 94°C, 15 Sec at 60°C, 60 Sec at 72°C and 7 min at 72°C. For beta-actin: 1 min at 94°C; 30 cycles of 30 Sec at 94°C; 30 Sec at 59°C; 60 Sec at 72°C and 7 min at 72°C. The resulting PCR products were resolved and visualized by 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Bands were photographed and analyzed with Eagle Eye II Dark-room Cabinet still video imaging system using Eagle-Sight v3.1 software (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
2.10. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
C4-2B cells were plated and treated with 30 μM MK591 at 37°C. Then, the cells were harvested, washed and RNA was isolated from exponentially growing cells using Qiagen RN-Easy Mini Kit from Qiagen. For the real-time PCR, one microgram of total RNA was used for the RT reaction using high capacity cDNA-RT kit from ABI/Life Technologies. Then the qPCR reactions were performed using TaqMan gene expression assay kits from ABI/Life Technologies using ABI-7500 Fast real-time qPCR machine.
2.11. Soft-agar colony formation assay
Colony formation assays were performed in six well tissue culture plates by placing ~5,000 C4-2B cells in 0.5 ml of 0.3% soft-agar on top of a 2 ml base layer of 0.6% agar. Plates were allowed to settle and then the wells were covered with 2 ml fresh RPMI medium containing 10% FBS with or without inhibitors. Then, the plates were incubated at 37°C in the CO2 incubator for a period of three weeks. Cell growth medium and inhibitors were exchanged every fourth day. At the end of incubation period, cells were stained with 0.25% crystal violet in PBS for 30 min and photographed with a Nikon digital camera attached to a Leica microscope at x300. Then, the total number of colonies (with ≥ 50 cells per colony) in each well was counted for quantitation.
2.12. Luciferase assays
C4-2B cells were transfected with lentiviral Stat3-luciferase or E-box-luciferase constructs (>90% cells transfected), expanded, and re-plated in 96 well culture plates in triplicates. Cells were then treated with inhibitors (MK591 or Stattic) with proper controls and the luciferase activities were measured by a luciferase assay kit (Bright-Glo) from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI).
Results
3.1. MK591 selectively decreases viability of the castration-refractory, bone-invading C4-2B prostate cancer cells
Previously we found that both MK591 and 5-Lox shRNAs decrease the viability of LNCaP prostate cancer cells via induction of apoptosis [23]. This apoptosis is prevented by metabolites of 5-Lox, suggesting that 5-Lox activity plays an important role in the survival of these cancer cells. Later, we found that the active 5-Lox metabolite (5-oxoETE) signals via its cognate GPCR, OXER1, and involves PKC-epsilon as down-stream kinase [30]. Since most of the deaths due to prostate cancer happen due to androgen-resistant, metastatic disease, we wanted to examine whether MK591 can affect the bone-invading C4-2B prostate cancer cells which are androgen receptor positive but do not depend on androgenic-stimulus for their growth and survival. We observed that inhibition of 5-Lox by MK591 dramatically alters the morphology of C4-2B prostate cancer cells, whereas ibuprofen, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase was ineffective, suggesting a role of 5-Lox in the survival of C4-2B cells (Fig 1A). Interestingly, we observed that MK591 did not decrease the viability of normal human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) isolated from healthy donors (Fig 1B and 1C). Analysis of HFF and C4-2B cells by RT-PCR and Western blot revealed that whereas the C4-2B cells express high amounts of 5-Lox mRNA and protein, the expression of 5-Lox in HFF cells is undetectable (Fig 1D and 1E), suggesting that the expression and function of 5-Lox is cancer-specific.
3.2. MK591 blocks the in vitro invasion and soft-agar colony-forming abilities of C4-2B prostate cancer cells at sub-lethal doses
Castration-resistant, bone-metastatic prostate cancer cells are characterized by disproportionately higher invasive capability due to extensive genetic reorganization. This type of cancer is invariably lethal because no effective treatment is currently available to tackle their aggressive characteristics. Hence we tested the effect of MK591 on invasiveness of the androgen-refractory, bone metastatic C4-2B cells. This experiment was done using trans-well matrigel invasion chambers and cell culture inserts containing 8 micrometer pore-sized polyethylene terephthalate membrane coated with a thin layer of matrigel basement membrane matrix. We found that MK591 at sub-lethal doses dramatically block the in vitro matrigel-invasive capability and soft-agar colony-forming abilities of C4-2B prostate cancer cells, suggesting that MK591 may turn out to be an effective agent to control development and growth of castration-refractory prostate cancer with bone invasion (Fig 2A–2D). However, ibuprofen (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) did not affect the invasive- or soft-agar colony-forming capabilities of C4-2B cells in the same experimental conditions at similar concentrations.
3.3. MK591 dramatically decreases the protein levels of c-Myc and its targets in C4-2B cells
The c-Myc oncoprotein plays a pivotal role in promoting metastasis in various types of cancer cells, including prostate cancer cells [31–40]. Thus, we analyzed the effect of MK591 treatment on the levels and functions of c-Myc as well as a range of its targets that are associated with prostate cancer cell survival, proliferation, and apoptosis-resistance. We found that MK591 decreases the protein level of c-Myc in a clear dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig 3A and 3B). Moreover, by using the c-Myc DNA-binding domain-luciferase constructs (E-box-Luc), we found that MK591 treatment reduced the transcriptional activity of c-Myc (Fig 3C). We also observed that both the protein levels as well as mRNA expression of a range of c-Myc transcriptional-targets are decreased under the same experimental conditions, suggesting that the transcriptional function of c-Myc in C4-2B cells is significantly inhibited by MK591 treatment (Fig 3D and 3E). Ibuprofen, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, was used as a negative control which was found to be ineffective.
3.4. MK591 treatment-induced decrease in c-Myc levels in C4-2B cells occur via inhibition of Stat3-mediated transcription
The dramatic loss of c-Myc protein due to MK591 treatment intrigued us to explore the underlying mechanism. At first, we performed a cycloheximide-chase experiment and found that the loss of c-Myc function by MK591 treatment is not due to enhanced protein degradation (Fig 4A). This finding triggered us to test the hypothesis whether the decrease in c-Myc protein after MK591-treatment happens due to a transcriptional blockade of c-Myc mRNA. We addressed this by treating cells with actinomycin D (a blocker of transcription), and found that actinomycin D dramatically decreases c-Myc protein level in similar time-frame, suggesting that a transcriptional blockade may reduce c-Myc protein level in these cancer cells (Fig 4B). Later, by real-time PCR, we confirmed that the expression of c-Myc mRNA decreases significantly with MK591 treatment (Fig 4C). We recently reported that the 5-lipoxygenase activity is linked with PKCε and Stat3 signaling in LNCaP cells [23]. Thus, we wanted to test whether MK591 reduces the level of c-Myc via Stat3-mediated transcription. Interestingly, we found that MK591 strongly inhibited the transcriptional activity of Stat3 in C4-2B cells (Fig 4D). Moreover, we found that Stattic (a Stat3 inhibitor) decreases both c-Myc protein level and c-Myc-luciferase activity in a clear dose- as well as time-dependent manner (Fig 4E and 4F), suggesting that MK591 treatment triggers disruption of c-Myc function in C4-2B cells via inhibition of Stat3-mediated transcription of the c-Myc gene.
3.5. MK591 induces membrane lipid-asymmetry, PARP-cleavage, caspase-3 activation, and DNA-degradation in C4-2B prostate cancer cells
The morphological changes in C4-2B cells with MK591 treatment reminded us about the possibility of cells undergoing apoptosis. Indeed, we observed that treatment with MK591 induces externalization of phosphatidyl-serine (a hall-mark of apoptotic cell death) to the surface membrane which is characterized by distinctly positive binding of non-permeabilized C4-2B cells with annexin-V (Fig 5A). Characteristic cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP (poly-ADP ribose polymerase) which are indicators of caspase-mediated apoptosis were also observed in MK591 treated C4-2B cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 5B and 5C). Further analysis revealed elaborate degradation of nuclear DNA to nucleosomal fragments which is an indicator of advanced stage of apoptosis (Fig 5D). Interestingly, cells treated with ibuprofen in parallel experiments, did not show any signs of apoptotic features, suggesting that the induction of apoptosis in the C4-2B cells by the 5-Lox inhibitor is highly selective.
3.6. MK591 induces apoptosis in C4-2B cells via rapid activation of c-JNK
The c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (c-JNK) plays an important role in apoptosis induction in many cell types [41–47]. Hence, we wanted to know whether MK591 treatment activates c-JNK, and whether c-JNK plays any role in induction of apoptosis in these androgen-refractory, bone-metastatic C4-2B prostate cancer cells. We observed that a rapid activation of JNK occurs with MK591 which is distinguishable as early as one-hour post treatment (Fig 6A). Activation of c-JNK was detected by using dually-phosphorylated c-JNK antibodies (Thr 183-X-Tyr 185). Moreover, when the cells were pretreated with SP600125, a specific inhibitors of JNK activity, a dose dependent decrease in DNA degradation was observed, confirming that JNK plays an important role in MK591 treatment-induced apoptosis in C4-2B cells (Fig 6B), Inhibition of MAPK pathway by U0126 (a MEKK inhibitor) showed no appreciable effect in preventing apoptosis in the same experimental conditions. c-JNK is known to phosphorylate and inhibit several proteins which play active roles in maintaining mitochondrial permeability barrier. By using the Mitotracker-red dye we observed that treatment with MK591 damages mitochondrial integrity and induces permeability-transition. The loss of mitochondrial membrane potential was evident by a significantly decreased red fluorescence in MK591 treated cells (Fig 6C).
3.7. MK591 triggers apoptosis in C4-2B prostate cancer cells involving down regulation of PKCε without inhibiting AKT
The PI3K-Akt pathway plays an important role in the regulation of cell survival and apoptosis in many cell types [48–52]. However, recently we reported that 5-Lox inhibition-induced apoptosis in the androgen-sensitive LNCaP human prostate cancer cells occurs via inhibition of PKCε without inhibition of Akt [22,23]. We also found that a continuous activation of PKCε in prostate cancer cells occurs by signaling from OXER1, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for which the 5-Lox metabolite 5-oxoETE serves as the major ligand (30). Thus, we wanted to examine how MK591 affects Akt and/or PKCε while inducing apoptosis in the androgen resistant, bone metastatic C4-2B prostate cancer cells. Interestingly, we found that MK591 down-regulates protein levels of PKCε in C4-2B cells in a dose-dependent manner. However, MK591 does not affect the activating-phosphorylation of AKT (Ser-473) in the same experimental conditions (Fig 7A and 7B). Moreover, we found that FR236924, an activator of PKCε [53,54], prevents MK591 treatment-induced decrease in c-Myc transcriptional activity, suggesting that MK591 treatment-induced loss of c-Myc function in C4-2B cells occurs, at least partially, via down-regulation of the activity of PKCε (Fig 7C). Finally, we found that low doses of MK591 and docetaxel work synergistically to kill C4-2B cells (Fig 7D), which suggests that greater success can be achieved when these two compounds are used in combination at doses which are lower than the doses needed to be used individually as monotherapy.
Discussion
Our current observations document that MK591, a second-generation leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor, decreases viability of the bone-invading C4-2B prostate cancer cells (Fig 1). The C4-2B cell-line was derived from the parental LNCaP human prostate cancer cells, and represents advanced, castration-resistant disease. Based on the current state of understanding of prostate cancer as a disease, we believe that our findings are especially significant and of special interest in prostate cancer biology because these cells retain the characteristics of castration-resistant, bone-metastatic prostate cancer which is incurable by any therapeutic modalities currently available in the clinic. More interestingly, we found that MK591 does not affect normal, non-cancer human fore-skin fibroblasts (HFF) under the same experimental conditions. HFF cells, like many other normal body cells, do not express 5-Lox presumably because of promoter hyper-methylation [55–60]. Since MK591 does not affect normal, non-cancer cells, our findings also suggest that the anticancer effect of MK591 is largely based on cancer-specific molecular mechanism (s), and thus, should be devoid of adverse side effects. Further work is needed to test this concept by in vivo experiments.
Effect of MK591 on invasion and soft-agar colony formation by C4-2B cells at sub-lethal doses reminds that this agent may possess the capability of stopping the dispersal as well as new colony formation of prostate cancer cells at distant sites which are typical characteristics of the metastasis process (Fig 2). C4-2B cells are characterized to be castration-refractory and are equipped with special capabilities to invade bone [24,61]. Thus, our new findings of a remarkable effect of MK591 in preventing invasion and soft-agar colony formation of C4-2B cells brings hope for its use in treating deadly bone-metastatic prostate cancer which actually takes most of the human lives lost due to prostate cancer. The c-Myc oncogene is well-known to regulate various cellular signaling mechanisms that are responsible for enhanced growth, decreased apoptosis and resistance to therapy. Particularly noteworthy is the effect of c-Myc oncogenic signaling in promoting the metastatic ability of cancer cells via transcriptional up- or down-regulation of a range of other genes that participate in pro- or anti-metastatic cellular processes. Thus, we wanted to explore in greater detail the effect of MK591 in the regulation of c-Myc function. The dramatic inhibitory effect of MK591 on c-Myc function and expression of its target genes, support the concept that the anti-metastatic effects of MK591 may be mediated largely via down-regulation of c-Myc gene function (Fig 3). Recently, we found that 10058-F4, a chemical inhibitor of c-Myc, exerts anti-metastatic effects in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, suggesting a role of c-Myc in the metastatic progression of these prostate cancer cells (unpublished data). Further experiments are underway to explore this hypothesis.
How MK591-treatment triggers a dramatic loss of c-Myc protein in C4-2B cells is an intriguing question. The cycloheximide-chase experiment reveals that the MK591 treatment-induced decrease of c-Myc protein is not faster than a translational blockade by cycloheximide which suggests that a post-translational mechanism may not be responsible for MK591-induced loss of c-Myc protein (Fig 4). Loss of c-Myc protein by blockade of transcription by Actinomycin D and the actual decrease of c-Myc mRNA by MK591 confirmed the involvement of transcription inhibition as a mechanism in the regulation of c-Myc by MK591. Stat3 is one of the prominent members among the transcription factors to regulate c-Myc and is linked with 5-lipoxygenase activity in prostate cancer cells. Our observations of the inhibition of Stat3 transcriptional activity by MK591, and inhibition of c-Myc activity by Stattic (an inhibitor of Stat3) suggest that the down-regulation of c-Myc upon MK591 treatment occurs via blockade of Stat3-mediated transcription (Fig 4D,4E and 4F).
The morphological alteration in C4-2B cells (but not in HFF cells) reminded us that the predominant mechanism of cell death may be due to induction of apoptosis. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing cells for manifestation of apoptotic-features using standard apoptosis assays and observed that MK591 effectively induces externalization of phosphatidyl-serine, activation of caspase-3, cleavage of PARP, and degradation of chromatin-DNA to nucleosomal-fragments, which collectively document that MK591 kills C4-2B cells via induction of apoptosis (Fig 5). To understand whether the stress kinase, c-JNK/SAPK, plays any role in apoptosis we found a time-dependent increase in the activating phosphorylation of c-JNK in C4-2B cells upon MK591 treatment. Moreover, our observation of a significant inhibition of MK591-induced apoptosis by pre-treatment of cells with SP600125, an inhibitor of c-JNK activity, demonstrates that this type of apoptosis is mediated via induction of c-JNK activity (Fig 6). Previously we observed a rapid activation of c-JNK upon MK591 treatment in LNCaP cells which is prevented by exogenous addition of 5-Lox metabolite 5(S)-HETE in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting a critical role of 5-Lox in suppressing activation of c-JNK in prostate cancer cells [21]. A dramatic loss of mitochondrial membrane potential upon MK591 treatment indicates involvement of mitochondria in apoptosis induction which is also known to be promoted by activated c-JNK.
The Akt/PKB signaling is very well characterized to promote cell-survival and prevent cell-death via a range of defined anti-apoptotic mechanisms. However, our results show that MK591 triggers apoptosis in C4-2B cells without inhibition of Akt, suggesting that these cancer cells are equipped with additional (Akt-independent) survival mechanisms which are fundamental to their survival and may be regulated by metabolism of arachidonic acid via 5-Lox which is blocked by MK591 (Fig 7). An Akt-independent survival mechanism has been characterized in LNCaP cells using a variety of factors [62]. And recently, we explored a new survival/anti-apoptosis mechanism operating in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells which is promoted by arachidonate 5-Lox and is mediated via protein kinase C-epsilon (PKCε) which was found to be associated with a G protein-coupled oxo-eicosatetraenoid receptor (OXER1) for which 5-oxoETE (the active metabolite of 5-Lox) serves as the major ligand [30]. Our observation of the prevention of the loss of c-Myc function by the PKCε inhibitor, FR236924, documents that MK591 treatment-induced loss of c-Myc is mediated via inhibition of PKCε (Fig 7C). PKCε has already been shown to play a significant role in the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer and metastatic progression. Thus, our findings suggest that small molecule inhibitors, such as MK591 induces apoptosis in C4-2B prostate cancer cells which is independent of Akt inhibition, and that MK591 may prevent metastatic prostate cancer via down-regulation of PKC-epsilon and c-Myc oncogenic signaling. Since, low doses of MK591 and docetaxel work synergistically to kill C4-2B cells (Fig 7D), it appears that greater success can be achieved when MK591 is used in combination with docetaxel at doses lower than the doses currently used in the clinic as monotherapy.
It is interesting to note that under normal heath conditions, expression of 5-Lox is restricted to specific immune cells such as neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils and macrophages (not in T cells) where it plays a role in chemotaxis, whereas the vast majority of non-immune parenchyma body cells do not express 5-Lox unless inflammatory diseases occur, such as asthma, arthritis, psoriasis, and cancer [55–60,63–65]. Our recent findings revealed increased expression of 5-Lox in prostate tumors compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues (data not shown) which are consistent with data from previously published studies [66]. Altogether these findings suggest that 5-Lox may play an important role in prostate cancer development and progression. Thus, the 5-Lox pathway is emerging as a promising target for therapeutic development against prostate cancer. Putting all together, our findings indicate that MK591 possesses all major attributes of a standard anti-metastatic agent with significant cancer-selective effect, and suggest that MK591 may turn out to be an effective agent for therapy of castration-resistant, bone-metastatic prostate cancer. Though details of the molecular underpinnings of the anti-metastatic action of MK591 are unknown at this time, it gives us an opportunity for further exploration to better understand the signaling mechanisms involved by in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Acknowledgments
We thank Z. Zhou for helping with the real-time PCR assays. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number RO1 CA152334, the United States Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program W81-XWH-05-1-0022, and the Henry Ford Health System internal research grant A10203 to JG.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number RO1 CA152334, the United States Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program W81-XWH-05-1-0022, and the Henry Ford Health System internal research grant A10203 to JG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64: 9–29. 10.3322/caac.21208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Marques RB, Dits NF, Erkens-Schulze S, Weerden WM, Jenster G. Bypass mechanisms of the androgen receptor pathway in therapy-resistant prostate cancer cell models. Plos one 2010;5: e13500 10.1371/journal.pone.0013500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Attard G, Sarker D, Reid A, Molife R, Parker C, et al. Improving the outcome of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer through rational drug development. Br J Cancer 2006;95: 767–774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Harris WP, Mostaghel EA, Nelson PS, Montgomery B. Androgen deprivation therapy: progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6: 76–85. 10.1038/ncpuro1296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG, Spaulding JT, Benson R, et al. A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. New Eng J Med. 1989;321: 419–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shaw GL, Wilson P, Cuzick J, Prowse DM, Goldenberg SL, et al. International study into the use of intermittent hormone therapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate: a meta-analysis of 1446 patients. BJU Int. 2007;99:1056–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ryan CJ, Eisenberger M. Chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: now it’s a question of ‘‘when?”. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 8242–8246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fleshner N, Bagnell PS, Klotz L, Venkateswaran V. Dietary fat and prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004;171: 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kolonel LN, Nomura AN, Cooney RV. Dietary fat and prostate cancer: current status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91: 414–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. West DW, Slattery ML, Robison LM, French TK, Mahoney AW. Adult dietary intake and prostate cancer risk in Utah: a case control study with special emphasis on aggressive tumors. Cancer Causes Control 1991;2: 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, et al. A prospective study of dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85: 1571–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Sacks FM, Grodstein F, Giovannucci EL, et al. Prospective study of plasma fatty acids and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86: 281–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang Y, Corr JG, Thaler HT, Tao Y, Fair WR, et al. Decreased growth of established prostate LNCaP tumors in nude mice fed a low-fat diet. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87: 1456–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wynder EL, Rose DP, Cohen LA. Nutrition and prostate cancer: a proposal for dietary intervention. Nutr Cancer 1994;22: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wang Y, Corr JG, Thaler HT, Tao Y, Fair WR, et al. Decreased growth of established human prostate LNCaP tumors in nude mice fed a low-fat diet. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87: 1456–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rose DP. Effects of dietary fatty acids on breast and prostate cancers: evidence from in vitro experiments and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66: 1513S–1522S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ghosh J, Myers CE. Arachidonic acid stimulates prostate cancer cell growth: critical role of 5-lipoxygenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235: 418–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ghosh J, Myers CE. Central role of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase in the regulation of cell growth and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;469: 577–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Anderson KM, Seed T, Vos M, Mulshine J, Meng J, et al. 5-Lipoxygenase inhibitors reduce PC-3 cell proliferation and initiate nonnecrotic cell death. Prostate 1998;37: 161–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ghosh J, Myers C. Inhibition of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase triggers massive apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95: 13182–13187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ghosh J. Inhibition of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase triggers prostate cancer cell death through rapid activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;307: 342–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sarveswaran S, Myers CE, Ghosh J. MK591, a leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor, induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells: synergistic action with LY294002, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase. Cancer Lett. 2010;291: 167–176. 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sarveswaran S, Thamilselvan V, Brodie C, Ghosh J. Inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase triggers apoptosis in prostate cancer cells via down-regulation of protein kinase C-epsilon. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1813: 2108–2117. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Thalmann GN, Anezinis PE, Chang SM, Zhau HE, Kim EE, et al. Androgen-independent cancer progression and bone metastasis in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1994;54: 2577–2581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Prasit P, Belley M, Blouin M, Brideau C, Chan C, et al. A new class of leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor: the development of MK-0591. J Lipid Mediat. 1993;6: 239–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Depre M, Friedman B, Hecken AV, Lepeleire ID, Tanaka W, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple oral doses of MK-0591, a 5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994;56: 22–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Roberts WG, Simon TJ, Berlin RG, Haggitt RC, Snyder ES, et al. Leukotrienes in ulcerative colitis: Results of a multicenter trial of a leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor, MK-591. Gastroenterology 1997;112: 725–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ferguson AD, McKeever BM, Xu S, Wisniewski D, Miller DK, et al. Crystal structure of inhibitor-bound human 5-lipoxygenase–activating protein. Science 2007;317: 510–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Evans JF, Ferguson AD, Mosley RT, Hutchinson JH. What's all the FLAP about?: 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitors for inflammatory diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29: 72–78. 10.1016/j.tips.2007.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sarveswaran S, Ghosh J. OXER1, a G protein-coupled oxoeicosatranoid receptor, mediates the survival-promoting effects of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase in prostate cancer cell. Cancer Lett. 2013;336: 185–195. 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wolfer A, Ramaswamy S. Myc and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71: 2034–2037. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wolfer A, Wittner BS, Irimia D, Flavin RJ, Lupien M, et al. Myc regulation of a “poor prognosis” metastatic cancer cell state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107: 3698–3703. 10.1073/pnas.0914203107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wolfer A, Ramaswamy S. Prognostic signatures, cancer metastasis and MYC. Cell Cycle 2010;9: 3639 10.4161/cc.9.18.13220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ma L, Young J, Prabhala H, Pan E, Mestdagh P, et al. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12: 247–256. 10.1038/ncb2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ. Myc-modulated miR-9 makes more metastases. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12: 209–211. 10.1038/ncb0310-209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Civenni G, Malek A, Albino D, Garcia-Escudero1 R, Napoli S, et al. RNAi-mediated silencing of Myc transcription inhibits stem-like cell maintenance and tumorigenicity in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73: 6816–6827. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Koh CM, Bieberich CJ, Dang CV, Nelsonm WG, Yegnasubramanianm S, et al. MYC and prostate cancer. Genes Cancer 2010;1: 617–628. 10.1177/1947601910379132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Koh CM, Gurel B, Sutcliffe S, Aryee MJ, Schultz D, et al. Alterations in nucleolar structure and gene expression programs in prostatic neoplasia are driven by the MYC oncogene. Am J Pathol. 2011;178: 1824–1834. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yamamura S, Saini S, Majid S, Hirata H, Ueno K, et al. MicroRNA-34a modulates c-Myc transcriptional complexes to suppress malignancy in human prostate cancer cells. PLoS One 2012;7: e29722 10.1371/journal.pone.0029722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hawksworth D, Ravindranath L, Chen Y, Furusato B, Sesterhenn IA, et al. Overexpression of c-MYC oncogene in prostate cancer predicts biochemical recurrence. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010;13: 311–315. 10.1038/pcan.2010.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dhanasekaran DN, Reddy EP. JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene 2008;27: 6245–6251. 10.1038/onc.2008.301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kyriakis JM, Banerjee P, Nikolakaki E, Dai T, Rubie EA, et al. The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature 1994;369: 156–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kyriakis JM, Avruch J. Sounding the alarm: protein kinase cascades activated by stress and inflammation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271: 24313–24316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Maroney AC, Finn JP, Bozyczko-Coyne D, O’Kane TM, Neff NT, et al. CEP-1347 (KT 7515), an inhibitor of JNK activation, rescues sympathetic neurons and neuronally differentiated PC12 cells from death evoked by three distinct insults. J Neurochem. 1999;73: 1901–1912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nadeau PJ, Charette SJ, Landry J. REDOX reaction at ASK1-Cys250 is essential for activation of JNK and induction of apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell 2009;20: 3628–3637. 10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Maundrell K, Antonsson B, Magnenat E, Camps M, Muda M, et al. Bcl-2 undergoes phosphorylation by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinases in the presence of the constitutively active GTP-binding protein Rac. J Biol Chem. 1997;272: 25238–25242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kharbanda S, Saxena S, Yoshida K, Pandey P, Kaneki M, et al. Translocation of SAPK/JNK to mitochondria and interaction with Bcl-xL in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2000;275: 322–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 2007;129: 1261–1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7: 606–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Marte BM, Downward J. PKB/Akt: connecting phosphoinositide3-kinase to cell survival and beyond. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22: 355–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Altomare DA, Testa JR. Perturbations of the Akt signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene 2005;24: 7455–7464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hennessy BT, Smith DL, Ram PT, Lu Y, Mills GB. Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4: 988–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tanaka A, Nishizaki T. The newly synthesized linoleic acid derivative FR236924 induces a long-Lasting facilitation of hippocampal neurotransmission by targeting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2003;13: 1037–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kanno T, Yamamoto H, Yaguchi T, Hi R, Mukasa T, et al. The linoleic acid derivative DCP-LA selectively activates PKC-ε, possibly binding to the phosphatidylserine binding site. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47: 1146–1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Uhl J, Klan N, Rose M, Entian KD, Werz O, et al. The 5-lipoxygenase promoter is regulated by DNA methylation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277: 4374–4379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hoshiko S, Rådmark O, Samuelsson B. Characterization of the human 5-lipoxygenase gene promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87: 9073–9077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sorg BL, Klan N, Seuter S, Dishart D, Rådmark O, et al. Analysis of the 5-lipoxygenase promoter and characterization of a vitamin D receptor binding site. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1761: 686–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Klan N, Seuter S, Schnur N, Jung M, Steinhilber D. Trichostatin A and structurally related histone deacetylase inhibitors induce 5-lipoxygenase promoter activity. Biol Chem. 2003;384: 777–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Radmark O, Werz O, Steinhilber D, Samuelsson B. 5-Lipoxygenase: regulation of expression and enzyme activity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32: 332–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Radmark O, Samuelsson B. Regulation of the activity of 5-lipoxygenase, a key enzyme in leukotriene biosynthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;396: 105–110. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lin DL, Tarnowski CP, Zhang J, Dai J, Rohn E, et al. Bone-metastatic LNCaP-derivative C4-2B prostate cancer cell line mineralizes in vitro. Prostate 2001;47: 212–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Carson JP, Kulik G, Weber MJ. Antiapoptotic signaling in LNCaP prostate cancer cells: A survival signaling pathway independent of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and Akt/Protein Kinase B. Cancer Res. 1999;59: 1449–1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Wang D, DuBois RN. Eicosanoids and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10: 181–193. 10.1038/nrc2809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Ghosh J. Targeting 5-lipoxygenase for prevention and treatment of cancer. Curr Enzyme Inhib. 2008;4: 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Werz O, Steinhilber D. Therapeutic options for 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112: 701–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Gupta S, Srivastava M, Ahmad N, Sakamoto K, Bostwick DG, et al. Lipoxygenase-5 is overexpressed in prostate adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2001;91: 737–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.